May122023 RichardFearing149GreenGateBlvdCambridgeOnN1T0C5 WhoIsAccountableForTheIssuesAtTheCHRC? 1. I willstartoutbysayingthesenatedidasksomereallygoodquestionsbuttheindividualswhoareresponsibleforthefiascowerenotallinattendance. 2. I willnotholdbackinthisletterandthereasonwhyisbecauseWrongisWrong.Itdoesn'tnomatterwhatyourskincolourisanditdoesn'tmatterwhatyourpositionis.Whenithasbeendeterminedthatyouarewrongthenyouarewrong. 3. Marie-ClaudeLandrywasChiefCommissionerandCEOoftheCanadianhumanrightscommission(theCHRC)fromMarch2015toNov2022totaling7years9months. 4.

ItwouldseemtomeMarie-ClaudeLandryshouldhavebeentheoneansweringmostifnotallofthequestionsthesenatehad,andworsecasescenarioIanFineshouldhavebeenheldtoaccountaswell.FrommyvantagepointMr. Finegotoff easydespiteMs.Betchiaskingforhisresignation.InFactheshouldbeterminatedbutonlyafterhisinvolvementinthesituationhasbeenevaluatedandmadepublic. 5. IanFineistheexecutivedirectorfortheCanadianHumanRightsCommission(CHRC)andisresponsibleforthedaytodaymanagementoftheorganization. 6.

MrFine'spositionbyvirtueputshiminthepassengerseatandhemusthaveknownabouttheongoingissueswithintheCHRC.InfactMrFinehasheldthatpositionforaverylongtime. 7. InterimcommissionerCharlotte-AnneMalischewskijoinedtheCHRConNovember18,2022.SheholdsaMaster’sDegreeinRefugeeandForcedMigrationStudiesfromtheUniversityofOxford,jointBachelordegreesinCivilLawandCommonLawfromMcGillUniversity, andaBachelorofArtsinInternationalStudies&MusicfromEarlhamCollege.

8. TheissueI tookwithMsMalischewskiisthat(a)sheisnotqualifiedtobeinthepositionsheiscurrentlyin(b)shedoesn'thavethebackgroundtodealwiththeissuessheisnowfacedwith(

c) i feltnothingwhensheapologizenorwouldieverfeelanythingifsheshoulddosoagain.(d)Shefeltitwasherdutytoanswerquestionsshehadnoknowledgeof(e)shedidn'tinviteanyoftheblackexecutivestospeakonthematter. 9.

Ms.MalischewskitoldsenatorsthesanctionedemployeesnolongerworkforthecomplaintservicesbranchattheCHRC—althoughtheystillhavetheirjobs. 10.Wellthisjustmeanstheywilltakethesamebehaviortoanotherdepartment.Thismovedidnotfixtheactualproblem,nordiditaddresstheproblempermanently.ItremainswithinandundertheemploymentofthegovernmentdespiteMs.Malischewskistating“TheCommissiondoesnottolerateracismofanykindinourworkplace.” 11.Thisisahy·poc·ri·sy.

Definition=“Thepracticeofclaimingtohavemoralstandardsorbeliefstowhichone'sownbehaviordoesnotconform;pretense.” 12.AccordingtotheCHRCwebsiteMs.Malischewskibringstotheroleextensiveexperienceinlawandadvocacy, anddeepcommitmenttohumanrights. 13.AquicksearchonCanliirevealsthefollowingpubliclyavailablecasesMs.Malischewskiworkedon. (a)Reddockv. Canada(AttorneyGeneral),2019ONSC5053(CanLII)LawyersH.MichaelRosenberg,JamesSayceandCharlotte-AnneMalischewskiforthePlaintiff.ThisCasearisesoutoftheuseofadministrativesegregationintheFederalGovernment’spenitentiaries, (b)Reddockv.

Canada(AttorneyGeneral),2019ONSC3196(CanLII) (c)OntarioCollegeofTeachersv. Bouragba,2021ONCA8(CanLII)ChristineL.LonsdaleandCharlotte-AnneMalischewski.Thiscasewasamotionsbeforethecourt.Therespondent,TheOntarioCollegeofTeachers(the“College”),seekstoquashtheappealbroughtbyMr. Bouragba. (d)Bouragbav. OntarioCollegeofTeachers,2018ONSC6935(CanLII)

(e)CanadianCivilLibertiesAssociationv. Canada(AttorneyGeneral),2018ONCA1038(CanLII)LawyersJonathanLisus,H.MichaelRosenberg,LarissaMoscuandCharlotte-AnneMalischewski,fortheappellant.Thiscasewasaboutthereview”foradministrativesegregation. (

f) OntarioCollegeofTeachersvCharland,2017ONOCT64(CanLII)LawyersChristineLonsdaleandCharlotte-AnneMalischewski,McCarthyTétraultLLP,assistedbyAnnieLacroix,LawClerk.Thecasewasaboutamotionfiled. (g)OntarioCollegeofTeachersvGlazer, 2017ONOCT102(CanLII).ChristineLonsdaleandCharlotte-AnneMalischewski,McCarthyTétraultLLP, forOntarioCollegeofTeachers.ThiswasahearingbeforeapaneloftheDisciplineCommittee(the“Committee”)oftheOntarioCollegeofTeachers(the“College”)onDecember13,2017atToronto. (h)Bouragbav. ConseilScolairedeDistrictCatholiquedel’Estdel’Ontario,2021ONCA195(CanLII).LawyerCharlotte-AnneMalischewski.Thisasamotionbeingheard.(

i) OntarioCollegeofTeachersvLenting,2021ONOCT11(CanLII)LawyersCharlotte-AnneMalischewskiandKathrynMcChesney, fortheOntarioCollegeofTeachers.Thiswasamotiontodismissacase. (

j) CanadianCivilLibertiesAssociationv. Canada,2019ONCA342(CanLII)JonathanLisus,H.MichaelRosenberg,LarissaMoscuandCharlotte-AnneMalischewski,fortherespondingparty.

Thiscasewasaboutadministrativesegregation. 13.AfterreviewingmostofthecasesonCanliiitseemsmostofMs.MalischewskiworkinvolvedactingascounselfortheOntarioCollegeofTeachers.ItseemsafarcryfromherintroductionontheCHRCownwebsite.Ms.Malischewskiisnothingmorethanalawyer. 14.HollyHoltman,SeniorGeneralCounselandDirectorGeneralofLegalServicesjoinedtheCHRCinMayof2021.However, whensheappearedatthehearingshewasexclusivelybeingusedasaproptoshowtheaudiencethecommissionisdiverse.However, whattheydidn'tknowisthatitactuallyshowedtheopposite. 15.Ms.Holtmansimplyhadnobusinessthere.Shewasofnousetoanyoneinparticularme,amemberofthepublic.

MyOwnCasesAndConflictWithTheCHRC 16.I actuallyfiled2caseswiththecommissiononewasinMarchof2020Case#20200711nowupforJudicialT-903-22.I alsofiledanothercomplaintfile#20200873inAugustof2020nowupforjudicialreviewT-423-23. 17.Basedontheissuesraisedatthehearingmycasewillcontinueforthenext4yearsatbest. 18.Afterhearingabouttheissuelikeeveryoneelseonthenews.I immediatelyknewtheCHRCdidinfactdiscriminateagainstmebasedonhowtheyhandledbothofmycases. 19.ItwasevidentfromhowtheCHRChandledmycasesthatI feltanditseemscleartometheCHRCwasinfactdiscriminatingandthusfightingagainstmeinsteadofhelpingme.I willsendanotheremailaboutthisissuebutfornowi willcontinuewithwhati wantdone.

RecommendationForTheNextHearing 20.I wouldliketoseethesenateholdamorepublichearingandi wouldalsoliketoappear. 21.TheindividualsyouheardfrommaynothavehadanyrecentcasesbeforetheCommissioninorderforthesenatetohearfirsthandhowtheCHRCdealtwiththeCanadianPublicasoflate. 22.PleasebringthejusticeministerandMarie-ClaudeLandryinforquestioning.

ChangesAtTheCHRCIfItStillRemains 23.BringbackallofthecasesthatwentbeforetheCHRCwithinthepast3years.IbelievetheCHRCmishandledallofthesecases.NoCanadianshouldhavetosufferforsomeone'selse'smistake.ThisisnotanissuefortheCanadianpublictodealwith. 24.AsktheFederalCourttosendbackallofthecasesbeforeitbasedonwhathascometolightrecently. 25.Whistleblowerprotectionforinternalemployeesbuiltintotheactorlaw.

26.AcomplaintsystemforthepublictoengagewhentheCommissionstepsoutofline.anOmbudsman. 27.AdecisionreconsiderationboardthatiscompletelyindependentfromtheCHRCthatreviewscasesbeforebeingsentoff forjudicialreview. 28.RemoveemployeesfromtheCommissionwhentheymishandledcases. 29.Hirepeopleotherthanlawyers.Lowerthestandardtoentry. 30.RemoveIanFineifitisshownheknewabouttheissuesanddidn’tact. 31.Createalegalclinicforcomplainants. 32.MakeitmandatoryfortheHROtointerviewthecomplainantsandtherespondents. 33.TheCommissionstaff tobeheldLiablefortheirownactionscriminally.

ChangesAtTheCHRCIfItDoesn’tRemains 34.RemovetheCHRCcompletelyandjustmakeittheCHRT. 35.Createalegalclinicforcomplainants. 36.HireMorestaff. 37.Shortenthetimeframetohaveacomplaintheard. TheProblemWithMyRecommendation 38.ItisobviousthatiftheemployeesworkingattheCommissionarenotheldtoaccountfortheiractioncriminallyorlegally, theseissueswillcontinueforever. TheLegalImplicationoftheCommission'sStaffBehaviorTowardsThePublic.

39..

TheCommissionStaff seemstohavecommittedtheoffenseofObstructionofJusticeinthefollowingways. 40.Anadjudicatorinacaseusespersonalbiasesandprejudicestomisrepresentevidenceandmakeadecisioninfavorofonepartyovertheother. 41.Refusingtorecuseoneselffromacasewhenaconflictofinterestexists. 42.Withholdingevidencethatisrelevanttoacase. 43.Suppressingorconcealingevidencethatisrelevanttothecaseorproceeding. 44.Misrepresentingfactsortestimonyintheofficialrecord. 45.Providingmisleadingorfalseinformationabouttheauthenticityoraccuracyofevidence. 46.Intentionallydisregardskeyevidencepresentedbyaparty, andmakesadecisioninfavoroftheotherparty.

Conclusion 47. It wouldbehardtoimaginemuchlesstoconceivewhyanyonefromthepublicwouldhaveanyconfidenceintheCanadianHumanRightsCommission. 48.ThisisthesamebodyoffolkswhoapparentlyareprofessionallytrainedonhowtohandleHumanrightscomplaintsfromthepublicwhoarenowtheperpetratorsofsuchbehaviors. 49.AsaJamaicanI amnotwillingtotakeanychanceswiththeCHRCgoingforward.Itshowsnomatterthetraininggivenpeoplewillalwaysberacists. 50.PleaseremovetheCHRCfromthesystem. RichardFearing