An Act to amend the Supreme Court Act (understanding the official languages)
C-232 (40)
LEGISinfo Bills
Committee report presented Debate at report stage Debate at third reading Debate at third reading Third reading First reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Supreme Court linguistic duality bill to ensure justice and equality for all (Opinion ~ Bill C-232) A solution, or deliberate creation, of a problem?
Bilingualism [Blog post] [electronic resource] : a legal competency Someone is sure missing the point [electronic resource] Requiring supreme court judges to be fully bilingual is not in the interest of Canada [electronic resource] Does Bill C-232's proposal to force Supreme Court of Canada judges to 'understand' French and English really achieve more : or is there a better solution? Fully-functionally bilingual S.C.C judges : oui ou non?