Judicial Accountability through Sexual Assault Law Training Act

C-337 (42)

LEGISinfo Bills

Judicial Accountability through Sexual Assault Law Training Act

C-337 (42)

LEGISinfo Bills

Introduction and first reading Debate at second reading Committee report presented with amendments Concurrence at report stage Debate at third reading First reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Debate at second reading Second reading Committee report presented with amendments CJC considers making courses for judges mandatory Defence counsel deny law on consent needs reform : reversing burden of proof would violate Charter, lawyers say Pas très clair, votre honneur !

MPs pass sex assault training bill but bumpier ride coming in Senate Women's advocates, defence counsel call for transparency from judiciary on sexual assault law training for judges CJC 'very hopeful' Senate will heed red flags judiciary raised about judicial training Judicial misconduct in the sexual assault trial « Why couldn’t you just keep your knees together? » : l’obligation déontologique des juges face aux victimes de violences sexuelles Judicial training bill passes Senate committee with changes easing judicial independence concerns of bench, bar

Document details

CollectionLEGISinfo Bills
CitationC-337 (42)
Typebill
Volume / chapterC-337 (42)
Languageen
Formatjson
SourceLEGISINFO
Identifierd3d94cca8856920bfb0e7d923d7c8c3d0faa3994

Official source

Source file is stored in the law ingest library (json).