Newfoundland and Labrador Hansard — Members' Statements; Statements by Ministers — 20 June 2012 (47th General Assembly, 1st Session, Vol. XLVII No. 51)
2012-06-20
Newfoundland and Labrador — Debates (Hansard)
June
20, 2012 HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY PROCEEDINGS
Vol. XLVII No. 51
The House met at 2:00 p.m.
MR. SPEAKER (Wiseman): Order, please!
Admit strangers.
Before we start today's session, I want to welcome to the gallery a former
Member of the House of Assembly, Ms Mary Hodder, who used to be the Member for
Burin Placentia West.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: Welcome back.
Statements by Members
MR. SPEAKER: Today, we are going to have members' statements from the
Member for the District of Lewisporte; the Member for the District of Burgeo
La Poile; the Member for the District of Cartwright L'Anse au Clair; the
Member for the District of Port au Port; the Member for the District of
Bonavista South; and the Member for the District of Port de Grave.
The hon. the Member for the District of Lewisporte.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. VERGE: Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize a young hockey player
in my district. Lucas Batt started playing hockey at the age of five, but his
drive, determination, and talent saw him progress through the system at a quick
pace.
After playing with the bantams for only one year, Lucas was granted
exceptional player status with Hockey Newfoundland and Labrador and started
playing Triple A Midget at age fourteen. Lucas played on the provincial
under-fourteen team, the provincial under-fifteen team, and the provincial
under-sixteen team.
Mr. Speaker, at the age of fifteen, Lucas left home and moved to Wilcox,
Saskatchewan to attend the Father Athol Murray College of Notre Dame, which is a
private boarding school. This school has Grades 9 to 12 and an elite hockey
team. Lucas did his Grade 10 while in Saskatchewan and he played with the Notre
Dame Argos, where he finished as the second leading scorer on the team.
Recently, Mr. Speaker, on June 9 in Quebec City, Lucas was taken in the second
round of the Quebec Major Junior Hockey League draft by the Victoriaville
Tigers.
Members of this House, would you please join with me, with Lucas's family,
his mom Denise and his dad Glenn, and the entire town of Lewisporte, in
congratulating Lucas Batt.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for the District of Burgeo La Poile.
MR. A. PARSONS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I rise today to recognize and congratulate the Relay for Life 2012 Committee
of Port aux Basques and area on raising $67,629.05 during the relay held in Port
aux Basques on June 9. Co-chairs Janet Doyle and Holly Farrell say this is the
largest amount collected to date. I was very honoured and privileged to be
included in this celebration of survival and the memorial of loved ones.
This year's relay included nineteen teams from all over the Southwest Coast,
as far as La Poile, and was attended by the largest number of cancer survivors
and caregivers to date. Ms Dollie Doyle was named Survivor Ambassador and her
husband, Mr. Ron Doyle, was named Caregiver Ambassador.
The evening started with a dinner for cancer survivors, followed by the
survivors' victory lap and speeches. Mr. Sidney Scott of Isle aux Morts told his
story of diagnosis and survival. The relay ran from 5:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m. and
volunteers kept everyone entertained with music, games, and skits. There was
plenty of food and prizes donated by local business and individuals.
Janet, Holly, and their nineteen-member committee, along with countless
volunteers, did a tremendous job and are to be commended for their hard work and
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
MR. A. PARSONS: dedication to this worthy cause.
Mr. Speaker, I ask all members of this House to join with me in extending
congratulations to the Port aux Basques Relay for Life 2012 Committee on another
successful relay.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for Cartwright L'Anse au Clair.
MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I rise in the House today to congratulate and thank all the communities in
Labrador that participated in the Relay for Life events in 2012. Mr. Speaker,
there have been four events held thus far in Labrador; two in my district in
Charlottetown and L'Anse au Clair, as well as one in Happy Valley-Goose Bay and
Labrador West.
The Relay for Life in Charlottetown attracted seven teams from Southern
Labrador communities and raised a total of $18,000. The event held in L'Anse au
Clair was the first ever Relay for Life in that area and it constituted of
eighteen teams from the Labrador Straits and the Quebec North Shore. They raised
a grand total of $44,000.
Happy Valley-Goose Bay, Mr. Speaker, also held their Relay for Life this past
weekend and the sixteen teams from Central Labrador raised a total of $58,000.
Mr. Speaker, Labrador West held their ninth annual Relay for Life raising a
total of $121,000. The twenty-five teams who participated included teams from
the Labrador West region and nearby Fermont, Quebec.
Mr. Speaker, the four Relay for Life events in Labrador raised an impressive
$240,000 for cancer research, and I am pleased to say that I was able to
participate or attend three of the four events. Those events would not be
possible without the hard work and dedication of many volunteers and team
members who worked tirelessly to organize them and raise these funds.
Mr. Speaker, I ask all my hon. colleagues to join me in congratulating these
teams, these communities, and these participants in Labrador who took
part in
this year's Relay for Life events.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The Member for Port au Port.
MR. CORNECT: I rise in this hon. House of Assembly to congratulate the
top winners of the thirty-eighth Annual Stephenville Rotary Music Festival.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
MR. CORNECT: The festival encourages and provides opportunities for the
youth in the Bay St. George area to develop and showcase their musical talents.
The Rose Bowl Award is the highest award given at the festival and this year's
winner was Stephen Eckert. Stephen was recognized for the giving the top
performance for his outstanding piano solo.
Also, Samantha Budden earned the best vocal award for her musical talent.
Lourdes Elementary School Choir was decorated with the Best Choral Scholarship
and Stephenville Middle School Grade 7 Band was awarded the Best in Band. There
were many other youth and groups who were recognized for their talents and they
are all to be congratulated.
Mr. Speaker, all of the organizers, adjudicators, and volunteers are to be
applauded for making the annual Rotary Club Music Festival a very successful and
important event.
I ask all hon. Members of the House of Assembly to join with me in
congratulating this year's winners and all the participants of the thirty-eighth
Rotary Music Festival and to thank them for making the festival yet another
success.
Thank you very much.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The Member for Bonavista South.
MR. LITTLE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, hon. colleagues, I would like to recognize and congratulate the
Grade 2 and 3 students of St. Mark's School in King's Cove for winning The
Energy Diet Challenge, sponsored by Shell Canada and Canadian Geographic .
In May of this year, the students accepted their award-winning banner and a
smart board as one of the grand prize winners in the national challenge.
From February 6 to March 30, with the help of their very dedicated teacher,
Mrs. Aylward, the students collected points that had them conserving energy and
teaching others how to do the same. They achieved a total of forty-one points by
completing seven challenges, including Post-It, Making the Energy Grade, and
Drew's One Hour No Power. Each of the student's hard work paid off, beating out
nearly 500 schools across Canada.
Mr. Speaker, members of the House, please join me in congratulating the Grade
2 and 3 students of St. Mark's School, as well as their teacher, Mrs. Alaina
Aylward, on such an impressive achievement.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The Member for Port de Grave.
MR. LITTLEJOHN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I rise today in this House to congratulate table tennis athletes Adam Drover,
Nick Hiscock, Jerry Hiscock, Alexandra Wells, Chris Hussey, and Tony Smith on
their medal-winning performances at the recent Atlantic Table Tennis
Championship held at Ascension Collegiate.
The event attracted over sixty athletes from across Atlantic Canada,
competing in team and individual events. Team Newfoundland and Labrador won both
the Senior and Junior Men's titles, while finishing runner up in Junior Women's.
This was the first time that Table Tennis Newfoundland and Labrador has hosted
this competition outside the metro area, and from all reports, it was a
resounding success.
I want to congratulate and thank the local organizing committee led by Mr.
Paul Drover for their time and effort in preparation for this event. It takes
countless volunteer hours to have events as this run smoothly from start to
finish, and this event was flawless.
I ask all hon. members to join me in congratulating our athletes and
organizers on their success.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: Before we move on to Ministerial Statements, I want to
acknowledge two former Members of the House of Assembly, and two former Cabinet
ministers who have joined us in the gallery today: Mr. Paul Oram, the former
Member for the District of Terra Nova; and Mr. Trevor Taylor, former Member for
the District of The Straits White Bay North.
Welcome back.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: I am not sure what the message is, three former MHAs show up
on the same day, but we will assume they missed the night sittings.
Now we will move on to Ministerial Statements.
Statements by Ministers
MR. SPEAKER: The Minister of Justice and Attorney General.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. F. COLLINS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, I am pleased today to provide an update to the House of Assembly
on an important initiative that we feel is making a difference in the lives of
some of our most vulnerable citizens.
Since 2005, the Mental Health Court has been operating in St. John's helping
participants access medical and community-based support. This court, Mr.
Speaker, is based on the recognition that certain offenders who suffer from a
mental disorder may commit offences as a consequence of their mental disorder or
related lifestyles. They may have inadequate or inappropriate housing, very
little employment, very little support, and they may not be taking their
prescribed medications or they may be self-medicating with alcohol and drugs.
Mr. Speaker, to date, 416 participants have appeared before the Mental Health
Court and in the last fiscal year, 2011-2012, fifty participants appeared in
relation to 149 charges. What is particularly encouraging, Mr. Speaker, is that
89 per cent of those participants engaged in support from the community where
they reached their treatment goals. In our view, this is a strong indicator of
success.
Anecdotally, Mr. Speaker, we are also hearing positive feedback from various
sources. In a recent decision, the Court of Appeal stated that the involvement
in the Mental Health Court has been a success and that the specialty court
process has worked. We have interviewed participants who have said that the
process has changed their lives and helped them with their recovery. They have
expressed their gratitude because they were treated as a person rather than a
number. Mr. Speaker, to me this is the greatest feedback we could receive.
The provincial government is certainly aware of the benefits of specialty
courts such as the Mental Health Court. In Budget 2012-2013: People and
Prosperity, this government recommitted to continue the pilot project for the
Specialized Family Violence Court. We are also undertaking an evaluation of
various drug treatment court models across the country in order to determine the
best approach for this Province.
Mr. Speaker, I would also like to thank the Provincial Court of Newfoundland
and Labrador, Public Prosecutions, the Mental Health Project of the Newfoundland
and Labrador Legal Aid Commission, Eastern Health, and Corrections and Community
Services for making the Mental Health Court possible and the success story that
it is.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for Burgeo La Poile.
MR. A. PARSONS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I thank the minister for an advance copy of his statement. I am very glad to
hear about the success of this project. Anybody who is involved in the legal
system has often seen people with mental health challenges get caught up in the
system. It is certainly hard on them, and some do not understand why they are
there or how they got there.
The court system is optimized at dealing with criminals, but it has not been
very good at dealing with people with mental health challenges. There are people
who break the laws, but once you get into the details of their offence you
discover they are not criminals in the traditional sense. This Mental Health
Court can help fill that gap and it concentrates on a dimension of offenders we
just do not pay enough attention to, Mr. Speaker. There have been too many
reports of judges complaining about having to sentence mentally ill patients
because they simply had nothing else, no other options that they could rely on.
This specialized court is a step on the road of ensuring there are more choices
in how to address these offenders.
I am also glad to hear that the family court project continues on, and as
well as work on the drug treatment court. However, I would like to see a bit
more progress on the drug treatment court which was promised but I do not know
if there have been any funds invested in this thus far, Mr. Speaker. Not only
must the time match the crime but the time must also match the offender.
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for St. John's Centre.
MS ROGERS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I would like to thank also the minister for an advance copy of his statement.
Thanks to all the people who worked so hard to make Mental Health Court work. It
is important and progressive work. I have heard praise from my own constituents
who have been through the process; however, the court is only one piece of the
puzzle. People need adequate community support, affordable housing, mental
health and addictions counselling and services. Without adequate community
support the courts cannot do its job. Also, good luck with developing a drug
treatment court. This is also forward and progressive work which is much needed
in the Province, and it must move beyond just research.
Thank you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Fisheries and Aquaculture.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. KING: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
On the heels of Public Service Week, I rise today to acknowledge a positive
initiative carried out through staff in my department.
Through the creativity and hard work of staff of the Policy and Planning
Branch of the Department of Fisheries, our government recently published a
children's book titled Jake the Puffin's Amazing Adventure . The book is a
fictitious story based on the actual event of Paddy the Puffin, who managed to
make his way to Montreal, Quebec, in 2011. By reading the book and completing
the accompanying activity guide, children learn about the importance of coastal
and oceans management.
Mr. Speaker, we thought this was a great idea from the start and have been
excited to follow it through to completion. Over the past few months, we have
seen a creative process at work and in the end we have a product that is fun,
informative and thoughtful.
The book was officially unveiled on June 9 at the World Oceans Day event at
the Marine Institute, and the reception since then has been incredible. Schools
throughout our Province have already submitted requests for extra copies of this
valuable resource for students.
The book is a great example, Mr. Speaker, where staff went above and beyond
the call of duty. Their personal commitment is indeed very appreciative here
from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Government of Newfoundland
and Labrador. All of our people indeed are working hard on behalf of the
Province.
The ocean continues to be an economic driver throughout Newfoundland and
Labrador today. Therefore, Mr. Speaker, it is imperative that we continue
supporting projects that enlighten and educate children and encourage them to
carry forward with an affinity for the ocean and our coastlines like generations
of individuals before them did.
Mr. Speaker, whether it is through science-related expeditions for students,
scholarships, World Oceans Day activities, or an educational book for children,
our government is committed to the youth of our Province and indeed committed to
the sustainability of our fishery, oceans, and coastlines. Mr. Speaker, this
book is available for download from the Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture
Web site, and other copies are available upon request.
Thank you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Opposition House Leader.
MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I thank the minister for an advance copy of his statement. I want to join him
in very heartily, Mr. Speaker, commending the staff at the Department of
Fisheries and Aquaculture for this innovative and very practical initiative. Not
only is it important that our public servants be encouraged to unleash their own
creativity and step outside of the box from their usual work, but, Mr. Speaker,
what an innovative way to teach our children about the ocean and all the aspects
that inhabit it, and how we use it as Newfoundlanders and Labradorians.
I think we all remember the story of Paddy the sea bird that was found in
Montreal, Mr. Speaker, and was brought home to the rehabilitation centre in Ship
Cove. It is nice that has turned into something that can be used as a tremendous
learning tool, not just in the schools in our Province, but for children around
the world as well.
Mr. Speaker, what I would do is in commending the staff in the department and
recognizing the wonderful work that they have done, I also might suggest to them
that they might want to do another book and they could call this one: the hon.
minister and Captain Kipper fly off in Question Period. I think that would make
for an interesting story itself.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MS JONES: Mr. Speaker, there are a lot of good storybooks they could do
while we are in that department. I am recognizing the former Member for The
Straits White Bay North and the former Minister of Fisheries, who is in the
gallery today. When I think about it, Mr. Speaker, I think of another great
storybook about how the Fisheries Minister, Mr. Speaker, swaps raw material for
jellybeans in the House of Assembly. That was a wonderful episode in our history
for sure.
There is a lot to write about, Mr. Speaker tons to write about, I say. I am
glad to see that the people in the department, the public servants who work for
us in this Province, are capturing the real messages in the jobs that they work
in. They are using their energy and creativity to bring those messages to the
children around the Province to teach them about our resources, about our
traditions, our culture, and most importantly, our Province.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for The Straits White Bay North.
MR. MITCHELMORE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I too thank the minister for an advance copy of his statement. This is an
interesting project, and kudos to the staff who worked on it. It is always a
good thing to see people unleash their creative side, and I hope this is not the
end, like the Member for Cartwright L'Anse au Clair had just stated.
It would be a great opportunity to work with other departments and to develop
a series of publications on other important issues in this industry such as
co-operatives, harvesting new species, and protecting and sustaining the
industry. Maybe we can work with a local group of storytellers to look at
stimulating entrepreneurial activities and further economic endeavours. The very
most important piece of this is that in all the work that we do, it is teaching
our next generation.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: Oral Questions.
Oral Questions
MR. SPEAKER: The Leader of the Official Opposition.
MR. BALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The type of fuel used at Holyrood is currently priced at $94 to $96 a barrel.
Recent fuel projection provided by the PUB to Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro
based the consumer electricity rates on oil price at $118 a barrel. This means
we have unjustified high electricity payments.
I ask the Premier: When will Hydro submit revised fuel pricing projections to
the PUB to adjust down the prices to consumers?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Natural Resources.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. KENNEDY: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
In terms of the projections for oil pricing, it is done in two ways. There is
the short term, where we try to look at or PIRA in New York, for example, will
look at what takes place over a couple of months and then we have to look at
what takes place over a period of time.
What we see from the latest increase, Mr. Speaker, that came out from
Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro was based on the price of oil as it existed. At
this stage, however, I think it would be somewhat precipitous to start making
adjustments or to say that we should go back before the PUB when the price of
oil is at $96, Mr. Speaker. As Dr. Mark Schwartz, the head of PIRA in New York,
had put it: all it takes is one event in the Middle East and the price of oil
can shoot up again.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The Leader of the Official Opposition.
MR. BALL: I will remind the minister that this has been well over a year
now when we looked at the prices that are actually trending much higher.
After months and months, there is still no finalized term sheet with Emera or
final arrangements with the federal government on the loan guarantee.
I ask the Premier: Why have these aspects of the Muskrat Falls project been
delayed so long and when do you expect to see them finalized?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Premier.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
PREMIER DUNDERDALE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, both these instruments that are drawn up for signing by both
parties, contractual agreements between both parties, are complicated pieces of
work. I am happy to report to the House and to the people of the Province that
both pieces of this work are progressing extremely well, Mr. Speaker, and we
hope over the next number of weeks that there will be official announcements
made on both.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The Leader of the Official Opposition.
MR. BALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
We know this has been an ongoing process right now and certainly the delays,
I would imagine, are a lot longer than we anticipated, but, Mr. Speaker, I will
move on.
The development of Muskrat Falls is contingent on the ratification of the New
Dawn Agreement with the Innu Nation. Last week, the Chief of Natuashish stated
publicly that the agreement was dead and that he would never support it.
So, I ask the Premier: What does this do to your Muskrat Falls development
plans?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Natural Resources.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. KENNEDY: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The New Dawn Agreement was negotiated over a long period of time with the
heads of the Innu Nation and the chiefs, Mr. Speaker, and their representatives
from Natuashish and Sheshatshiu. The agreement was signed it is a signed
document, which brings enormous benefits to the Innu Nation in Labrador, Mr.
Speaker. It gives them first priority in terms of the jobs available, and also a
very significant commission for lack of a better term and also, very
important to the Innu people: redress for the Upper Churchill.
So, Mr. Speaker, with all due respect to the Chief of Natuashish, I would
suggest that he should consult a lawyer before he starts making comments like
that.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The Leader of the Official Opposition.
MR. BALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Well, recently I met with the Marystown Shipyard Family Alliance, which has
been advocating since 2006 for justice to the workers affected by the
multi-chemical exposure at the Marystown Shipyard. That dates back to 1967. They
appears to be working against them, rather than working with them.
So I ask the Premier: When will she do the honourable thing and request that
workers' compensation go to Marystown and talk to the individuals whose health
has been affected and negatively impacted by this tragedy?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Service Newfoundland and Labrador.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
There has been a tremendous amount of work done in relation to Marystown
Shipyard, the workers of Marystown who worked there for many years and just
recently, as we announced and discussed in this House during this session, the
IRSST report, which was a comprehensive document which was developed to review
shipyard workers and the potential hazards that exist in shipyards. That
document is now being used to assist in the adjudication of cases from Marystown
and from other industries as well, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The Leader of the Official Opposition.
MR. BALL: Well, I remind the minister, there may have been a lot of work
done, but right now there is not a whole lot accomplished. Close to ten years
ago, the University of Toronto completed a study commissioned by the government
that suggested that Marystown was a ticking time bomb for cancer. It is a decade
later, and the latency period for cancer, as we know now, to develop an
exposure, is well beyond us.
So I ask the Premier: Will you instruct the minister who is responsible for
workers' compensation to set up intake clinics similar to what they do in
Ontario, and to formally document and monitor those workers who have been
impacted?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Service Newfoundland and Labrador.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The hon. member opposite in his
preamble to his question has indicated that
it was a suggestion. We cannot work on suggestions, we have to work on facts
that are available to us, we have to make the adjudication of cases based on the
facts that are available, and have to do that with consideration for each and
every individual case.
Every individual case that comes before the Workplace Health, Safety and
Compensation Commission is given due diligence, I can assure of that. I can
assure the people of Newfoundland and Labrador, it is a very serious matter for
us. We are continuing to work with the individuals in Marystown. We will use the
best evidence available to us to help us adjudicate those cases.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The Leader of the Official Opposition.
MR. BALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The minister will know in a second here it was not only the University of
Toronto that made this suggestion. In 2000, there was a press release from the
current MHA for St. John's South and this is what was said: The liability in
Marystown "extends to the clean up of contaminants, restoration of marine
environment and compensation to the workers or their families who incurred
health problems because of the contaminated workplace."
I ask the Premier: Does she concur with the MHA that the Province is still
liable for the Marystown Shipyard workers?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Service Newfoundland and Labrador.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The working conditions and the existence of certain chemicals in shipyards
and other industries, not only in Newfoundland and Labrador, Mr. Speaker, but
throughout Canada and throughout the world were very different many, many years
ago twenty, twenty-five, or thirty years ago they were very different than
they are today.
We have a very good track record currently in this Province for Occupational
Health and Safety. We have very good practices in place. We have good
legislation, which we have made improvements to. Just this past year, we have
made more improvements to our Occupational Health and Safety regulations. We
will continue to do that, Mr. Speaker, because the safety of the workers in
Newfoundland and Labrador is paramount for this government.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The Member for Burgeo La Poile.
MR. A. PARSONS: Mr. Speaker, all the news out of NOIA this week is the
need for more skilled labour. For example, Vale has stated they have hit the
wall when it comes to supplying their Long Harbour project form the local or
regional labour pool. Meanwhile and I am sure all members get the same we
get e-mails every day from apprentices saying they cannot find work.
I ask the Premier: With all the jobs supposedly available, why can't these
people find work?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Advanced Education and Skills.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MS BURKE: Mr. Speaker, there is a two-pronged answer to what we are
addressing from the hon. member today. One is the apprentices in Newfoundland
and Labrador. Mr. Speaker, this Department of Advanced Education and Skills,
through previous Budgets and again this year's Budget, has put a significant
amount of money into wage subsidies for apprentices so employers will have the
ability to hire apprentices in workplaces where apprentices may not otherwise
have that opportunity.
In addition to that, Mr. Speaker, the College of the North Atlantic has
increased its funding year over year. We have almost doubled the number of seats
in skilled trades in Newfoundland and Labrador. Mr. Speaker, through our
investment in post-secondary and as well through our investment in the
employers, we are certainly making contributions we feel are necessary in order
for the people of this Province to be able to participate in the labour market
and what we know as the upcoming labour shortages in the Province.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The Member for Burgeo La Poile.
MR. A. PARSONS: Mr. Speaker, we appreciate the efforts. We know the
efforts are there, but we are just not getting the results.
Each union in the Long Harbour collective agreement has stipulated a minimum
and maximum ratio of apprentices to journeypersons. They can range from a
minimum of one apprentice to five journeypersons, to a maximum of one apprentice
to one journeyperson. While the parties to this agreement agreed to maximize the
placement of apprentices, we are hearing Vale's preference has been closer to
three journeypersons for each apprentice.
I would ask the minister: What role can government play to ensure apprentice
placements are maximized on these special projects?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Advanced Education and Skills.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MS BURKE: Mr. Speaker, there are certainly ongoing talks and negotiations
as we move through any major project in Newfoundland and Labrador to ensure that
the people of this Province have the ability and the opportunity to participate
in the jobs that are available.
One thing, Mr. Speaker, this government does, or has done at this point in
time, as every government does, is there is a ratio set for apprentices. That
includes the maximum that a journeyperson to an apprentice could be, but, Mr.
Speaker, any negotiated contract on any given workplace, it is the employer's
prerogative as to how they want to set up journeypersons and apprentices. One
thing that most employers keep in mind, especially in workplaces that could be
hazardous, is they do not necessarily follow the ratio. They have to follow what
is safe for that particular environment.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for Burgeo La Poile.
MR. A. PARSONS: The Minister of Advanced Education and Skills indicated
to CBC in March that government isn't yet willing to legislate a certain number
of apprentices to be taken on for projects.
I would ask the minister: With Bill 37 before the House and special project
owner and operators facing a skilled labour shortage, might it be time to
legislate better ratios to resolve the shortage?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Advanced Education and Skills.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MS BURKE: Mr. Speaker, it is a very important question because we all
want to make sure that apprentices in Newfoundland and Labrador have the ability
to work. We would love to be able to legislate the ratio and the number at any
given day for any given work site. Mr. Speaker, we can set a ratio and we can
negotiate and work on contracts, but we also need to make sure that the
employers have the latitude to set up a workplace that takes into consideration
the safety of the people who are on that site.
Mr. Speaker, we cannot insist that a higher number of apprentices are on the
site that would exceed what they feel makes a safe work site. So, as much as we
would like to do it, we have to make sure that the employer still has the
latitude to provide safety for the workers on that site.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for Burgeo La Poile.
MR. A. PARSONS: Mr. Speaker, unions are not adding to their list unless
there is a reasonable chance of work for those at the bottom. Those already on
the list often remain there while they work in Alberta and hold out for enough
work from projects like Long Harbour so they can come home.
I would ask the Premier: Where were you two years ago when Vale Inco was
sending Long Harbour construction projects to Texas, like the 160,000 metres of
pipefitting work, instead of utilizing our local workforce?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Premier.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
PREMIER DUNDERDALE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, a timely question indeed, and I am going to recommend an action
to the Member for Burgeo La Poile. I met with Gus Doyle and his executive this
morning from the unions, Mr. Speaker. There is nobody being blocked from being
added to the list, I am assured by Mr. Doyle.
I would encourage the Member for Burgeo La Poile to meet with Mr. Doyle and
his membership, who represent over 10,000 workers in this Province, and have a
talk with him about the opportunities that abound in Newfoundland and Labrador,
and abound, he assures me, for every qualified worker to join their union, Mr.
Speaker. If there is any reluctance, it is around apprentices. They still
continue to add apprentices, but with some caution.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Opposition House Leader.
MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The long-awaited, long-term care plan for aging and disabilities in our
Province finally saw the light of day today. Four years later, and it only
contained two concrete initiatives. It is shocking and disappointing, I say, Mr.
Speaker, to see the lack of any concrete initiatives for seniors and families in
this Province.
I ask the minister: Why do we not see a concrete initiative around
family-based home care today?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MS SULLIVAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, first of all I would like to correct the member opposite, there
are seventy initiatives that were outlined in this long-term care strategy this
morning.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MS SULLIVAN: Mr. Speaker, if she had been at the news release this
morning she would have known that. There are seventy initiatives in there. One
of those initiatives, Mr. Speaker, if you had read this strategy, is on page 23,
I believe, and it outlines very clearly our plan around paid family caregivers.
It is an initiative in this strategy. It is an initiative that we have committed
to; it is an initiative that we are going to see through. It is an initiative
that we are going to announce very, very soon. We said that this morning.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Opposition House Leader.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
What the government rolled out this morning was they launched two specific
initiatives that they are ready to move on in the Province. One of the
initiatives that is critical to families in this Province is the home caregiver,
family caregiver program. I say to you minister, you committed to it in an
election, you committed in this House that it would be part of the strategy.
I ask you today: When are you going to roll out that program so that families
in this Province can give the care they need to their loved ones?
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MS SULLIVAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, again, I want to suggest to the member opposite that she get a
copy of this strategy. She could not make it down there this morning. If you got
a copy of it, you obviously never got to page 23, page 23,
section 3.1.2; read
it. It tells you we will implement this family-paid care giving. We will do it
soon.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Opposition House Leader.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
The hon. the Opposition House Leader.
MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
There is a big difference in what we will do and what we are doing. Four
years ago, you said you were going to do a long-term care plan for this
Province; today we have seen it four years later.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MS JONES: Is the minister saying today that families in this Province may
have to wait four years until they get ready to launch an initiative? I ask
today, Mr. Speaker, why is the government not honouring their commitment they
made when they were knocking the doors in this Province and giving the people in
this Province a family caregiver program now? Why should they have to wait four
or five years to see it?
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MS SULLIVAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, this is both infuriating and irresponsible. The people of
Newfoundland and Labrador are out there and they know that we have made this
commitment to them. They are waiting for it. I am telling you here today, we
told you this morning at the press conference had you been there that we are
doing this. The ink is on the paper. We are close to finalizing this. You will
see this very soon. Stop fear mongering to the people of Newfoundland and
Labrador.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
The hon. the Opposition House Leader.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
This is the same government that six years ago said they were going to do a
hospital in Corner Brook. Four years ago, we have been waiting for a long-term
care plan. Now, Mr. Speaker, we are over a year now in this Province waiting
almost two years for a family caregiver
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
The Speaker has recognized the Opposition House Leader.
MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Now it is time for them to act on that commitment. The Wait Time Alliance,
Mr. Speaker, also says that the bed blockage in this Province is costing huge
amounts of dollars. It is costing our health care system over $100 million every
year and meanwhile, Mr. Speaker, the budget for the next five years for the
strategy combined is $160 million.
I ask you today, minister: Why was the bed blockage issue not addressed in
this strategy and why was there no concrete initiative around this?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MS SULLIVAN: Mr. Speaker, I wish I could have twenty minutes to respond
to this, because again, this is not fair. First of all, on that Wait Time
Alliance, I want to point out we are rated third in the country in terms of
meeting the benchmark (inaudible).
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MS SULLIVAN: Third in the country, Mr. Speaker.
Now, Mr. Speaker, in terms of addressing bed blockage, let us look at what we
are doing here. There are any number of initiatives that will address that
within this strategy. We are looking at enhanced physician services that will
keep people out of hospitals and out of emergency departments, with more visits
by physicians in their homes, Mr. Speaker, to seniors in Newfoundland and
Labrador.
We are looking at a rapid response program, through our emergency departments
and through a number of other departments that will keep people from actually
having to go to a hospital in the first place. They will be triaged at home, Mr.
Speaker.
We are looking at the family caregiver
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
The hon. the Leader of the Third Party.
MS MICHAEL: Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
The strategy for long-term care and community support services released today
says government will have a pilot project this year that will place eight people
requiring a higher level of care in three private personal care homes. It seems
that government is moving toward a private for-profit nursing home care system
through the back door.
So, Mr. Speaker, I ask the Premier: When did government decide to start
changing our public long-term care to a for-profit care system?
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MS SULLIVAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Again, this is the second opportunity we have had to thank the Opposition for
the advance copy of their questions, or at least their (inaudible).
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MS SULLIVAN: So I do thank them for that, Mr. Speaker, but your questions
were predictable in any case.
Mr. Speaker, what we announced today listen to what we have announced; we
have announced that we are spending
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
AN HON. MEMBER: The Third Party.
MS SULLIVAN: You are right, the Third Party.
Mr. Speaker, we announced today that we spent annually $660 million on
long-term care services and community support services in this Province. What we
further announced today is a commitment of another $160 million in annual
spending in long-term care.
Mr. Speaker, when you add that up, we are spending more than three-quarters
of a billion dollars annually on long-term care
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Third Party.
MS MICHAEL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, we know that many people are on wait-lists for nursing homes
across the Province, and also that the new Hoyles-Escasoni facility in St.
John's will only have twenty-six additional beds to the current building.
Mr. Speaker, government is building facilities without creating enough beds
to deal with waiting lists and acute care patients who need convalescent beds,
and now they are continuing by having a pilot project in more personal care
homes.
So, Mr. Speaker, I ask the Premier: Is government's use of private nursing
home facilities really a temporary arrangement or a permanent direction?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MS SULLIVAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, once again I really do wish that the member of the Third Party
had come to the press conference this morning as well, or had taken the time to
read this strategy because she did not. In fact, she was out in the news
criticizing the strategy within about ten minutes of our press conference being
done. I do not know how she could have cracked the spine on this. I am pretty
sure she did not because what information she is putting out is totally
inaccurate, so I know that she has not read this.
Mr. Speaker, the focus of this particular strategy is not about loading up on
that end of it in terms of long-term care. What we are doing in this strategy is
we are working on optimal independence for our seniors and persons with
disabilities in this Province and quality of care.
Mr. Speaker, that is a continuum of care that does not start with long-term
care homes. That starts with better health care systems in the first place, that
starts with (inaudible)
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
The Leader of the Third Party.
MS MICHAEL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
What we received today from the government was another strategy without a
clear plan for action to deal with the crying need for a long-term care and home
care plan. What was presented was another pilot project
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
MS MICHAEL: As well, the strategy forecasts the need for 984 more
long-term care beds by 2022, ten years' time.
Mr. Speaker, I ask the Premier: What is government's plan for having 984 more
long-term care beds ready by 2022?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MS SULLIVAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, again this is really difficult. I have the temptation again to
pick up this strategy and read it to the members opposite so that they would
understand exactly what it is that this focus is about. Mr. Speaker
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
The Speaker recognizes that there may only be another week or two left in
this session; however, be patient. I ask members to be tolerant.
The Speaker has recognized the hon. the Minister of Health and Community
Services for a response. Please pay attention as she gives her answer.
MS SULLIVAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
It is hard to get it all out in here today. Mr. Speaker we have completed at
some substantial costs: a long-term care facility in Corner Brook. We have
completed a long-term care facility in Happy Valley-Goose Bay, Mr. Speaker. We
have completed other long-term care facilities. We are in the process, Mr.
Speaker, of working on a long-term care facility here in St. John's
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
The Leader of the Third Party.
MS MICHAEL: Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
I now invite the minister to read her own strategy where it says we need
another 984 beds, and none of those facilities will cover that.
Mr. Speaker, today's strategy as well says that government spent $3.9 million
over six years on creating a needs-based assessment tool for determining
people's needs for home care; however, the same document also says that
government will continue to impose a means test on people looking to receive
home care.
I ask the Premier: Why spend the money on designing a needs assessment when
your intention is still to approve care by imposing a means test?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MS SULLIVAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, when we are using an assessment tool, it is to assess the needs
of the clients in terms of how many hours of care they need and the kind of care
that they need. That is a very important aspect of what we do whenever we are
looking at clients in the health care system. We need to know what their needs
are.
I make no apologies for getting one of the best tools in North America to be
able to do that, the interRAI tool. I make no apologies for making sure that the
assessments that we do on our patients are the very best assessments that we can
possibly do.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The Member for St. John's Centre.
MS ROGERS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Minister Responsible for Newfoundland and
Labrador Housing Corporation.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
The Speaker has recognized the Member for St. John's Centre.
MS ROGERS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
My question is for the Minister Responsible for Newfoundland and Labrador
Housing Corporation and I know he is expecting it, so I assume he will be ready.
Many seniors who are struggling to pay rent cannot be helped by the Rent
Supplement Program because there is a wait-list and payments are tied to the
landlord. Mr. Speaker, British Columbia has a special program called Shelter Aid
For Elderly Renters, which pays a monthly rental allowance directly to all
low-income seniors who need it.
Mr. Speaker, I ask the minister: Will his government implement a specific
rental allowance program for seniors in this Province?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Transportation and Works.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. HEDDERSON: Again, Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for an advance copy
of her question. I will proceed to talk about what the Newfoundland and Labrador
Housing Corp are doing for seniors and what this government is doing for seniors
here in Newfoundland and Labrador.
For instance, with the affordable housing, Mr. Speaker, we are investing
heavily and right now we have about 1,100 units ready for seniors, in
particular, or those with challenges. As well, Mr. Speaker, we have managed
housing and I just reference one in particular from the District of St. John's
North, Northwest Rotary. We have forty units, Mr. Speaker, especially for
seniors, and the average rent is a little over $300 a month.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The Member for St. John's Centre.
MS ROGERS: Mr. Speaker, the Provincial Home Repair Program has a
wait-list of 2,200 people and the maximum grant is only $5,000, in today's
dollars, and after that you have to take out a loan or wait seven years to
reapply for more work. Mr. Speaker, most of the people who use the program are
low-income seniors. We have the fastest aging population in the country,
proportionately.
I ask the minister: Will his government increase the amount of home repair
grants so more seniors can remain living in their homes?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Transportation and Works.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. HEDDERSON: Mr. Speaker, one of the most successful programs that we
have in our housing corp. We are talking about investing I am just looking at,
$9.8 million last year helped 2,500 homeowners, mostly seniors in rural areas.
Mr. Speaker, I ask again, what more can we do?
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for The Straits White Bay North.
MR. MITCHELMORE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, on March 26 of this year, Service NL issued a ministerial order
to Sea Treat Limited giving the company ninety days to clean up and remediate
the company's former fish plant site in Englee.
I ask the minister: With four days left of the ninety, how is the clean up at
Englee proceeding?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Service Newfoundland and Labrador.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
As you referenced, I know it has been a long session and I apologize for
repeating the answers because I have given this information so many times over
the last couple of months. As a matter of fact, I have given it directly to the
hon. member opposite in discussions we have had with him.
The circumstances in Englee are very complex legal matters, Mr. Speaker. I
can assure you, I can assure the people of Englee and the people of Newfoundland
and Labrador that we continue to work through these very difficult legal
challenges that exist. We continue to try and make progress to move this
forward, and we will continue to do so.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for The Straits White Bay North.
MR. MITCHELMORE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Given that it looks like this is not going to happen in the ninety days, the
ministerial order, I ask the minister: What he actually plans to do, the
specifics to protect the residents of Englee from the deepening threat of this
derelict building?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Service Newfoundland and Labrador.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
It is obvious the member opposite does not understand what is at play here
and what legal complications and legal challenges really mean. He obviously does
not get it, Mr. Speaker. I have tried in as many ways as I can to try to explain
to the hon. member that these are circumstances that we must deal with. They are
very complex legal matters. We have to work through them in the best way that we
can. We are doing that, and we will continue to do so.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for St. John's East.
I ask the member to ask a quick question without
preamble.
MR. MURPHY: Well then if that is the case, when will this government
AN HON. MEMBER: Never.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The time for Question Period has expired.
Order, please!
The Member for The Straits White Bay North rose on a point of order on
Monday of this week, and I had indicated at the time that I would have an
opportunity to review Hansard. I have done that, and I rule there is no point of
order.
Presenting Reports by Standing and Select Committees.
Tabling of Documents.
Notices of Motion.
Notices of Motion
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Government House Leader.
MR. KENNEDY: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I give notice that under Standing Order 11, I shall move, seconded by the
Minister of Advanced Education and Skills, that this House not adjourn at 5:30
p.m. on Thursday, June 21, 2012.
Further, I give notice, Mr. Speaker, under Standing Order 11, I shall move
that this House not adjourn at 10:00 p.m. on Thursday, June 21, 2012.
MR. SPEAKER: Answers to Questions for Which Notice has been Given.
Answers to Questions for which Notice has been Given
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Advanced Education and Skills.
MS BURKE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in response to the Member for St. Barbe who has
tabled a question in the House of Assembly regarding the Department of Advanced
Education and Skills Job Creation Partnership. He has asked us to inform him
what was wrong in the content of a news release he issued with respect to Job
Creation Partnerships.
The Job Creation Partnerships program is helping people gain the work
experience and skills necessary to secure a long-term attachment to the labour
market. Mr. Speaker, this program provides funding through direct contributions
to sponsors or through the extension of employment insurance benefits for
project participants, and may include in-kind or in-cash contributions from
sponsors.
All Job Creation Partnerships projects are assessed taking into account
factors such as the local economic and employment conditions, including the
number of employment insurance beneficiaries in the region, as well as the
benefits for project participants and their communities. One key point that the
MHA for St. Barbe wrongly failed to mention in his news release is that the JCP
projects awarded during the latest round of approvals completely reflect these
criteria.
For example, in the District of Burgeo La Poile, held by the Official
Opposition, $619,347 was approved for seven projects. This was the second
highest amount approved, totalling just under 10 per cent of the total, $6.82
million. I would also like to point out that while clearly established criteria
were followed in the approvals process for the JCPs, the Official Opposition
holds 12.5 per cent of the seats in the House of Assembly, and their total
approved projects under the JCP program was 12.7 per cent. The Member for St.
Barbe was wrong not to point this out.
Mr. Speaker, with respect to information contained in the news release issued
by the Member for St. Barbe, the following information was wrong. Information
given regarding five of seven districts mentioned was wrong. Information
regarding the total amount of funding for the District of Trinity Bay de Verde
was wrong. Information on the amount of projects approved and the funding amount
for the District of Grand Bank was wrong. Information on the amount of projects
approved and the funding amount for the District of Carbonear Harbour Grace
was wrong. Information on the amount of projects approved and the funding amount
for the District of Ferryland was wrong. Finally, information on the amount of
projects approved and the funding amount for the District of Placentia St.
Mary's was wrong.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: Petitions.
Petitions
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for Bay of Islands.
MR. JOYCE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I rise today, Mr. Speaker, on a petition. It is concerning the concern today
that the minister made on her new strategy.
To the hon. House of Assembly for the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador
in Parliament assembled, the petition of the undersigned residents humbly
sheweth:
WHEREAS home care allows the elderly and people with disabilities to remain
within the comfort and security of their own homes; home care also allows people
to be discharged from hospital earlier; and
WHEREAS many families find it very difficult to recruit and retain home care
workers for their loved ones; and
WHEREAS the PC Blue Book 2011 as well as the 2012 Speech from the Throne
committed that government would develop a new model of home care and give people
the option of receiving that care from family members; and
WHEREAS government has given no time commitment for when government plans to
implement paying family caregivers;
WHEREUPON the undersigned, your petitioners, humbly pray and call upon the
House of Assembly to urge the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador to
implement a new home care model to cover family caregivers in the 2012-2013
Budget.
Mr. Speaker, we notice again today, we hear the minister come up today with a
new strategy that we are going to look at. This was a commitment that was made
in the 2011 election. It was a firm commitment made by the government, Mr.
Speaker.
There are a lot of people out in Newfoundland and Labrador, all throughout
Newfoundland and Labrador actually, who find it very difficult to find family
caregivers and home caregivers. It is a struggle for the family caregivers, Mr.
Speaker. There are a lot of instances that I know personally where people just
cannot get home care they just cannot get it. I understand one of the
ministers mentioned there are twenty across the Province that the family cannot
provide this care.
Mr. Speaker, this government made a commitment in 2011. Everybody in the
Province of Newfoundland and Labrador is expecting it. We are hoping today to
see the strategy implemented, Mr. Speaker. Obviously, it was not in it.
Once again, I present this petition, Mr. Speaker. I did not present any
petitions in the last little while, because I was hoping it was going to be in
this strategy today, which it was not. I urge the government once again to
follow up on their commitment to take care of family caregivers. Who it is going
to help are the most vulnerable people in Newfoundland and Labrador the people
who need help.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for Burgeo La Poile.
MR. A. PARSONS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I have a petition.
To the hon. House of Assembly of the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador in
Parliament assembled, the petition of the undersigned residents humbly sheweth:
WHEREAS hundreds of residents of the Southwest Coast of the Province of
Newfoundland and Labrador, including residents of the communities of Margaree,
Fox Roost, Isle aux Morts, Burnt Islands, Rose Blanche-Harbour Le Cou, Diamond
Cove, and La Poile, use Route 470 on a regular basis for work, medical,
educational, and social reasons; and
WHEREAS there is no cellphone coverage on Route 470; and
WHEREAS residents and users of Route 470 require cellphone coverage to ensure
safety and communication abilities; and
WHEREAS the Department of Innovation, Business and Rural Development recently
announced significant funding to improve broadband services in rural
Newfoundland and Labrador; and
WHEREAS the residents and users of Route 470 feel that the Department of
Innovation, Business and Rural Development should also invest in cellular phone
coverage for rural Newfoundland and Labrador;
WHEREUPON the undersigned, your petitioners, humbly pray and call upon the
House of Assembly to urge the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador to support
the users of Route 470 in their request to obtain cellphone coverage along Route
As in duty bound, your petitioners will ever pray.
Mr. Speaker, I wanted to bring this one up again today because I actually
received a call from a young girl in Burnt Islands today, which is on Route 470.
She sent me a message through Facebook and just said: Why can't we have
cellphone coverage in Burnt Islands, but there is some in Port aux Basques? I
actually had a conversation with her and explained there are some complications
here, as the minister has outlined, but that yes, everybody in this Province
should have cellphone coverage, no matter where they are.
This is somebody who was very young, but everybody has cellphones these days
and deserves to have that coverage. I thought it was timely and I am glad to
bring it up again today, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you.
Orders of the Day
Private Members' Day
MR. SPEAKER: This being Wednesday, Private Members' Day, we will now move
to the debate and the resolution as put forward by the Member for St. John's
Centre.
MS ROGERS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
WHEREAS the provincial government currently only has a strategy for social
housing that does not deal with the full crisis of affordable housing in the
Province; and
WHEREAS the home ownership assistance program promised by this government in
the provincial election has not come to fruition; and
WHEREAS shelter is a human right and all people in the Province have the
right to housing that meets the national occupancy standards; and
WHEREAS the House of Commons passed a motion on May 4 that the federal
government should: (
a) keep with Canada's obligation to respect, protect and
fulfill the right to housing under the UN International Covenant on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights; (
b) support efforts by Canadian municipalities to
combat homelessness; and (
c) adopt measures to expand the stock of affordable
rental housing, with a view to providing economic benefits to local housing
construction businesses;
THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED that the House of Assembly urge government to commit
to a provincial housing and homelessness action plan;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the House of Assembly urge government to call
upon the federal government to renew the Homelessness Partnering Strategy, the
Affordable Housing Initiative, and the Residential Rehabilitation Assistance
Program when the programs are up for renewal in 2014;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the House of Assembly urge government to create a
Division of Housing and Homelessness that will be given the responsibility to
co-ordinate government-wide action, and work with all levels of government and
the community on affordable housing.
Seconded by the Member for Signal Hill Quidi Vidi.
Mr. Speaker, I am happy to rise in this House to speak to this private
member's motion on housing.
MR. SPEAKER: Is there someone seconding your motion?
MS ROGERS: Yes, I said seconded by the Member for Signal Hill Quidi
Vidi.
MR. SPEAKER: I am sorry. Thank you.
MS ROGERS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Having a secure, safe place to live, meaningful work to do, a collection of
family or friends and good health care are the pillars of a well-functioning
society. Having a secure place to live is a foundation to be able to fully
participate in society. It enables you to get on with your life; it enables you
to get on with it and to participate fully.
First of all, I would like to acknowledge the work of the folks at the
Newfoundland and Labrador Housing Corporation who deliver wonderful programs and
supports to residents who use their programs. I commend also the incredible work
done by the Newfoundland and Labrador Housing and Homelessness Network, its
staff and partners, and particularly in their role in the development and
support of projects that were submitted to the federal provincial housing and
homelessness initiative program. This group also, Mr. Speaker, plays a very
significant role in lobbying government and pushing for more comprehensive
approaches to the services required by people in our Province with complex needs
and who become the growing number of homeless people in our communities. All the
non-profit groups who have developed and deliver incredible services through
their supportive housing initiatives, these are groups with expertise who work
with limited resources and who have worked so hard again in the whole area of
ensuing affordable housing for all citizens of the Province, for all people of
the Province.
Now I know that many of us went door to door in the last campaign and a lot
of us heard a lot of stories about people worried about their current housing
situation. Many of those people were seniors; seniors who were worried about
their present housing situation and then seniors who were very worried about
their future housing needs. Whether we were rural or urban districts, many of us
heard the stories about the housing challenges that our constituents face.
I remember and I have mentioned this in the House before being in three
different apartment buildings in my district, just in one night, and the number
of seniors who spoke to me about their rising rental costs, who lived in fear
that they were not so sure that they could afford the next rent increase. They
said: I cannot do one more rent increase. They had no control over that.
Somebody would say: If they cannot afford their rent, they will have to move
somewhere else. As we all know, there is nowhere else for them to go. In the
City of St. John's there is nowhere else for them to go. The wonderful housing
projects that have started for seniors across the Province already have waiting
lists, even before a nail is driven.
We have seniors living in fear. We have seniors who are facing a housing
crisis. We all talked to young families who were talking about how to make ends
meet, whether it was with their student loan payments and their child care
payments and then, on top of that, a mortgage payment. Families who were
struggling to make ends meet, and this in a time of prosperity for our Province.
This does not look like prosperity for all.
I came across young working families living in basement apartments and their
rent were equivalent to a mortgage payment, should they have been able to get a
mortgage payment. They could not qualify, even though their monthly rent may
have been equivalent to, or even in some cases more than what a mortgage payment
would be, but they could not qualify or they did not have enough money for a
down payment or the closing cost. Therefore, they are stuck in a cycle of paying
rent and not being able to take advantage of building up family wealth through
equity in their own home ownership.
Then, we have all come across people with mental health and addictions
issues, or folks released from correctional facilities living in deplorable
boarding house situations. We all know about these young families. Some in our
own families who face these particular challenges, or who are stuck in these
kinds of situations, stuck with no perceivable or foreseeable way out.
In February, myself, with the Member for The Straits White Bay North, went
on a little tour of the Province and stopped in a few places to speak to people
about their housing issues. The stories were the same, whether they were in
rural areas or urban areas. The housing problems we currently face in our
Province, those housing problems have not crept up on us unexpectedly. These
problems have been developing for a while, and we could see them coming. Over
the past five years it has accelerated, and without any concrete government
intervention, we can see that the acceleration is speeding up with no relief in
sight.
Last year, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation released its new stats
that said the average price for a new single home in Newfoundland and Labrador
has doubled since 2004. So, the average price to buy a brand-new home since 2004
has doubled, and it has doubled to $350,000. That price acceleration has
increased faster than the income factors. People's income has not doubled since
Also, the average price now for a used home in the Province is $266,459. So
that, coupled with the increase in cost of living in general, is making it very
hard for people to be able to afford adequate housing. Should you not be able to
get into the housing market, there is nowhere to rent. For any of us who would
need a place to rent now today in St. John's, for whatever reason, if we somehow
lost where we were living, most of us would be hard-pressed, even those with a
higher level of income would be hard-pressed to find a decent place to live.
Those are simply the facts. That is simply the reality.
Also, rents have almost doubled in the same time period. In most parts of the
Province, whether it be rural areas or urban areas, the vacancy rates are below
1 per cent. We cannot talk about this housing crisis, because whether we want to
call it a crisis or not, people are feeling the crisis in their day-to-day
living. People who are on the verge of losing their housing, because they cannot
afford increases, or seniors who are on the verge of losing their housing
because they cannot afford to stay in their houses, or because of physical
limitations their houses are not accessible, this is a housing crisis for them.
In their day-to-day living it is not simply a problem, it is a crisis, because
we all know if you do not have a place to live you cannot get on with your life.
We cannot talk about this housing crisis within our Province without looking
at the big picture, and the future looks bright. We are in a time of prosperity.
There is a growth of economic diversity Province-wide, from Labrador down to the
Southern Shore. With large-scale developments in the resource sector, it brings
some very concrete housing challenges, as we have seen in many parts of our
Province, Happy Valley-Goose Bay, LabWest, and Long Harbour. Work camps will not
address all the housing needs of our workers.
We know there will be an influx. Over the next so many years we know there
will be an influx of thousands of workers because the jobs are there and they
are needed, their labour is needed. With these developments and with the influx
of workers, also come an increase in service industries, and the workers who
become part of those service industries, and their families, because it is not
just all single workers who will arrive. One would hope that families will
arrive, that they will build communities, that communities will expand, and with
that will come the attendant need of services.
What has this government done to prepare for those housing needs and the
impacts of this on the relevant communities? What has government done to take
care of the challenges that come along with the influx of thousands of workers
and with the growing population of aging citizens? What has this government done
to prepare? We know there are programs through Newfoundland and Labrador Housing
Corporation that attend to some needs, but what has government done to this
growing, accelerating problem we have facing us now? If we look into the
not-too-distant future, we see it is growing at an exponential rate.
We do have the largest aging population proportionately in the country. We
know that seniors are faced with some of the most difficult housing challenges:
energy-efficiency problems, and homes that are too big for their current needs.
They have nowhere else to go. Should they decide to downsize?
Prosperity brings these extra challenges to people who do not benefit nor
share in the prosperity, but who in fact may experience negative effects those
who work in the low-wage economy, because in some of these service industries,
they will be low-wage jobs. How will people afford a place to live those who
do not have paid employment, those on very limited income, those with complex
needs with mental health or addiction problems, those who have been victims of
violence and must move, those who have been displaced and have no family or
community supports, people released from correctional facilities into
homelessness, and then the average working family, again, who is faced with an
unbridled, escalated, and volatile housing market, where their own incomes have
not increased at the same accelerated growth as has the cost of housing and the
general cost of living?
The government has attempted to address some of these issues through some of
the very successful programs of the Newfoundland and Labrador Housing
Corporation. There is a social housing rental program. I posit that although
this can be a very positive program, it carries its own problems as well. They
have a number of programs, which I will not have time to list right now.
Mr. Speaker, I look forward to speaking again, to not only the doom and
gloom, because I think there are some positive aspects
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
I remind the member that her time has expired.
MS ROGERS: I will speak again.
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for St. John's West.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. CRUMMELL: Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to stand in this hon. House to
speak to the Member for St. John's Centre's private member's resolution. This is
not the first time I stood in this House to talk about the many good things this
government has been doing regarding housing and homelessness.
Mr. Speaker, I have examined this resolution and when one looks carefully at
the resolution, it is clear that the Member for St. John's Centre and, for
that matter, the Third Party does not have a firm grasp on housing and
homeless issues. Certainly they do not have a grasp on our government's many
initiatives and progress in this area. As well, Mr. Speaker, this is the type of
fear mongering found in the resolution that is typical of the Third Party when
dealing with complex social issues.
Mr. Speaker, our government recognizes there are challenges when it comes to
housing. We are committed to working with various levels of government and with
various private and community agencies to develop solutions to these challenges.
We recognize in a strong economy, the housing sector is often impacted, in some
ways positively and other ways negatively, especially for lower-income earners
and those in greatest need. Mr. Speaker, we understand the issues and we are
confident we have the policies and programs in place to meet the challenges of
today and into the future.
Mr. Speaker, while the Third Party continues to throw out what it thinks are
simple solutions to complex problems, we really must look at the facts. Mr.
Speaker, in a recent CMHC press release it said Newfoundland and Labrador has
the third-lowest housing prices in the country. I would like to correct the
Member for St. John's Centre. She said that the average housing price of a new
house in Newfoundland and Labrador is $350,000. Mr. Speaker, the average in
this same report, it was $276,000. In St. John's it is $350,000; we can argue
over that one. This is probably the same report that you are referring to and I
have the report right here in front of me if you would like to have a look at
it.
In a subsequent release exactly a day later, CMHC reported that vacancy rates
in communities of over 10,000 people in April 2012 was 2.7 per cent in
Newfoundland and Labrador while the national average was 2.5 per cent. Mr.
Speaker, it is clear that, benchmarking Newfoundland and Labrador versus other
provinces, we are not in a crisis situation. In fact, we are doing better than
most provinces.
While this is true, we do recognize there are certain areas of the Province
where housing challenges do exist due to the vibrancy of the resource sector,
but, Mr. Speaker, our government has been working to meet these challenges.
Mr. Speaker, as we look closely at the private member's motion there are
three distinct resolutions, so let's have a look at them one at a time. The
first resolution urges the government to commit to a provincial housing and
homelessness plan, but, Mr. Speaker, this resolution is redundant. The Province
has a provincial social housing plan, it is called Secure Foundations. It was
released in 2009, resulting in many tremendous accomplishments.
Mr. Speaker, it is obvious the Third Party tries to minimize and dismiss the
social housing plan, but when the forty-fourth annual Canadian Housing and
Renewal Association Congress met here in the Province just last month, the
amount of positive feedback for our social housing plan was simply overwhelming.
In fact, Mr. Speaker, many delegates from many different jurisdictions commented
that they should be doing more work like we are doing here in Newfoundland and
Labrador. They were complimentary, not only about the process in which the plan
was developed, including dozens of community-based organizations and advocacy
groups, but they were complimentary on the quality of the document and the
action plans contained within it. The social housing plan focuses attention of
those in our society who are most at risk and in the greatest need. Mr. Speaker,
our government has spent tens of millions of dollars in a wide variety of
programs to help alleviate the challenges low and moderate-income families have
been experiencing in recent years in terms of affordable housing.
Mr. Speaker, here are just a few recent developments, programs that I would
like to highlight which are indicative that our social housing plan is not only
alive, it is in action. Mr. Speaker, over the past six years over 1,300
affordable housing units were built through government funding. The minister
referred to that earlier in Question Period. The Newfoundland and Labrador
Housing Corporation is in the process of building twelve units in Pleasantville
for seniors, while at the same time partnering with the City of St. John's on
another twenty-four affordable housing units, nine of which are for single
people with complex needs.
Mr. Speaker, for the first time ever, our government, through the tendering
process, made land available to contractors with the condition affordable
housing units must be included in the development. Mr. Speaker, this is
happening in Southlands. I saw the tender in the paper today. There needs to be
at least 100 affordable housing units in this tendering package, and, Mr.
Speaker, that is progress.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. CRUMMELL: Just to put things in a bit more perspective, Mr. Speaker,
millions of dollars have been spent on Memorial University's campus, as well as
rental campus in Corner Brook for new residences for 500 and 200 students
respectfully, which is going to free up hundreds of apartments in St. John's and
Corner Brook for the local rental market. Mr. Speaker, this is a very
significant move as well and it is going to really have a positive impact on the
rental market here in St. John's and in Corner Brook.
Mr. Speaker, with Budget 2012, the Newfoundland and Labrador Housing
Corporation increased its rent supplement by $1 million, which now positively
impacts over 1,750 families. Mr. Speaker, I could go on and on about the
millions we are providing in the Heat Subsidy Program, the Home Modernization
Program, the Residential Energy Efficiency Program, the Provincial Home Repair
Program, and the list goes on. So when I hear members opposite say they think we
have no plan, they lose credibility. They undermine their arguments, and
finally, Mr. Speaker, they minimize their ability to effect positive change by
not recognizing the facts and becoming part of the solution to the challenges
before us.
Mr. Speaker, with regard to the resolution urging government to commit to a
homelessness action plan, I would like to inform the Third Party there is such a
program. It is called the Supportive Living Program, formerly the Provincial
Homelessness Fund. Mr. Speaker, the Supportive Living Program was recently
transferred to the Newfoundland and Labrador Housing Corporation and a recent
budget increase has provided for $4.8 million annually. The Supportive Living
Program's budget of $4.8 million annually is directed specifically to on the
ground groups that are tackling the issues of homelessness head on. Fifteen
different organizations managing twenty-four different projects throughout this
whole Province, and these organizations include Choices for Youth, Stella Burry,
Brighter Futures, Community Education Network, and the list goes on.
Mr. Speaker, one of Canada's leading advocates for antipoverty initiatives,
Senator Hugh Segal, wrote in a recent
article just the other day, in The
National Post , that except for Newfoundland and Labrador, all provinces in
Canada pay welfare rates beneath the poverty line. Mr. Speaker, this
government's commitment to building a Province where things are better for your
family, for your children, for your grandchildren and your neighbour's children
and grandchildren has not gone unnoticed in the rest of this country.
Mr. Speaker, the final resolution urges the government to create a new
division of housing and homelessness. Mr. Speaker, again, the Third Party is
requesting setting up a new bureaucracy and for what? To deliver programs, do
research, and commence collaboration that is already being done? This is a tired
and redundant proposal.
Mr. Speaker, the Newfoundland and Labrador Housing Corporation does exactly
what this resolution calls for, and even more. Do we need to create a new
housing division? The answer is obvious: of course we do not.
Mr. Speaker, one final point. In the private member's motion, there is a
reference to the creation of the home ownership assistance program promised in
our 2011 Blue Book. Mr. Speaker, I can tell the members opposite, we are working
toward making this commitment a reality and we are prepared to restate it in the
House today through an amendment to the resolution, along with some other minor
amendments.
Mr. Speaker, I will not be supporting this motion in its present format, and
I would now like to put forward an amendment for the consideration of this hon.
House.
Mr. Speaker, I, the Member for St. John's West, seconded by the Member for
Harbour Main and Minister Responsible for Housing, do move that the Private
Member's Resolution currently before the House be amended:
(1) in the first recital clause by deleting the word "only" and replacing the
words "does not deal with the full crisis of" with the word "includes";
(2) in the second recital clause by replacing the words "the home ownership
assistance program promised by this government in the provincial election has
not come to fruition" with the words "this government promised in its 2011 Blue
Book to develop, following a period of consultation, a program to help families
with incomes up to $60,000 with the first purchase of a modest-priced home";
(3) in the first resolution clause by replacing the words "commit to a" with
the words "continue to implement its";
(4) in the second resolution clause by replacing "the Affordable Housing
initiative and the Residential Rehabilitation Assistance Program" with the words
"and the agreement for investment in affordable housing"; and
(5) in the third resolution clause by replacing the words "create a Division
of Housing and Homelessness that will be given the" with the words "ensure
Newfoundland and Labrador Housing Corporation continues to fulfill its".
Mr. Speaker, I have a copy of that amendment here for your purview, and I
leave it with you.
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER (Verge): Order, please!
The House will take a brief recess to consider the amendments put forward.
Recess
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
I have considered the amendment put forward the Member for St. John's West.
The amendment is in order.
I go back to the hon. the Member for St. John's West.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. CRUMMELL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
We do our homework over here and we made sure we had that right. Thank you
very much.
Mr. Speaker, just to finish up here quickly I have about three minutes on
the clock I just want to say to every hon. member in this House, the
amendments that we have put forward to this resolution are minor in nature, but
they do change a few things for sure. I think there is no reason why everybody
in this House should not unanimously support these amendments.
We actually left some of the language in there, Mr. Speaker, that was brought
forward by the Third Party. We do believe that they are thinking about the
average Newfoundlander and Labradorian, and people in need, just like we all
are. In particular, there is one piece of language there; the motion calls for
the creation of a division which we know we are not going to do; we already
have one to: "co-ordinate government-wide action, work with all levels of
government and the community on affordable housing, and be responsible for
research and the development of provincial housing policy...".
Mr. Speaker, in terms of coordinating government-wide action, the Social
Housing Plan is a direct result of such collaboration. We are already doing it.
There is already a ministerial and a deputy minister's committee on the Social
Housing Plan that brings together all the key players in government related to
housing. This refers to that piece that is in the resolution.
There is an Interdepartmental Advisory Committee from key officials from
Justice, Newfoundland and Labrador Housing Corporation, Advanced Education and
Skills, Health, and others that governs the Supportive Living Program, which
focuses on the needs of the homeless and those at risk of homelessness. Mr.
Speaker, we are fine with that language. There is another little piece here that
was called out in the motion that we are okay with.
In terms of research and development, the Housing Corporation has a
department called the Policy, Research, and Monitoring Department. They are
looking at housing policy issues, completing jurisdictional reviews, and
research constantly. Furthermore, they are just in the process of hiring a new
senior policy analyst who will have a focus of looking at issues of housing
affordability and will be a key contact with stakeholders who want to discuss
and research specific ideas and challenges.
Mr. Speaker, some examples of innovative things happening over at the Housing
Corporation: reconfiguring larger units for which there is little demand in this
day and age into multiple smaller units for which there is very high demand, and
encouraging small-size dwellings that are more affordable. I just mentioned a
recent request for proposal for a large portion of land in Southlands requires
that the successful proponent construct a large portion of smaller two-bedroom
and three-bedroom units between 800 and 1,000 square feet.
Mr. Speaker, our government is doing many, many things to address what we
know are challenges, but there is no crisis out there. We are meeting these
challenges head on. We have a plan in place. Mr. Speaker, we are going to put
the necessary resources behind that plan to make sure we execute with excellence
throughout the duration of this living, breathing document we call our Social
Housing Plan.
Mr. Speaker, again I want to encourage all hon. members in this House to
support the amendments and the resolution.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for Bay of Islands.
MR. JOYCE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I take the opportunity to stand and speak on this, because housing issues,
homelessness, and social housing is everybody's concern. I say to the Member for
St. John's West: I personally do not need any lecture about housing and
Newfoundland and Labrador Housing, I can assure you of that. I do not need it.
It takes away from the argument when you try to give lectures. I was setting up
social housing for people with disabilities long before you knew social housing
was even considered. There is no need of it there is absolutely no need of it.
We do not deserve it, because we are all in it together.
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
I would ask the member to speak to the Chair.
MR. JOYCE: Sorry, Mr. Speaker.
Once again, I get a bit upset when I feel people on this side are being said
to not listen and we are not involved with it. It is absolutely not true, Mr.
Speaker. I just want to let the Member for St. John's West know how many times I
was involved with housing, twenty-five and thirty years ago, long before I was
involved with politics. There is no need, because it is an issue for all of us
in Newfoundland and Labrador.
Mr. Speaker, before I go any further I just want to compliment the staff at
Newfoundland and Labrador Housing. I know the work that they undertake is
sometimes challenging and is never ending. There is always a need for staff. I
said it to the minister in Estimates that I pass onto the staff in Corner Brook
how grateful I am because I know our offices are in, if not daily contact, I am
sure it is an average of ten or fifteen times a week that we are in contact with
the minister's office in Corner Brook. The staff there are very professional and
always willing to help. I just want to ensure that the staff are well recognized
for the work that they do in Newfoundland and Labrador, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, housing is everybody's concern in this Province, the government
side, Opposition, all levels of government: federal, provincial and municipal. A
lot of times we look at people with low income for the social housing and that
is one aspect of the housing that the government is looking at. There is also
the aspect of the seniors, Mr. Speaker. I know the government has put in some
good initiatives for seniors in the Province. I know the minister was just out a
few weeks ago and was with the seniors in Corner Brook for a new initiative for
apartments out in the United Church. That is a well-deserved and a
well-recognized initiative that is being done for seniors.
A lot of the problems with the seniors, Mr. Speaker, are their increase in
rent, if they are renting, or even if they are in their home, the increase in
cost and the increase in heat. Maintaining their home sometimes becomes just
unbearable. Mr. Speaker, as we know now, about 13 per cent I think it is 13
per cent, from my reading of people on the Newfoundland and Labrador Housing
list now are seniors, and that list is rising daily. The more senior complexes
that we can set up, Minister, the more affordable housing, the more housing that
we have for people with disabilities, which would include seniors and other
people with disabilities, is greatly appreciated throughout the Province.
Mr. Speaker, I just heard the Member for St. John's West saying there is no
crisis. There might not be a crisis, but I guarantee you there is definitely a
need for more social housing across the Province. If you do not think there is
more of a need in social housing across the Province, come with me for awhile.
There have been steps done, absolutely, no doubt, but we cannot minimize the
concerns that people have out in the Province; we just cannot do it. I
understand there are a lot of steps being taken. I applaud a lot of initiatives
that the government has undertaken over the last number of years. I applaud the
federal government also when they were renewing the programs for the residential
assistance program.
Once again, I urge the government, in 2014, that we do whatever we can to
ensure that we renew this program because it is a great program. The number of
people that has helped to stay in their own homes is very encouraging. If
anything, if there is any possibility to increase that program with the federal
government, Mr. Speaker, because as we all know and it is just the way we are,
the people who live in their house the houses get older, they become less
energy efficient over time and every year the need almost arises. I do not think
we can ever meet the demand, and I do not think anybody expects any government,
this government or any other government, to meet every demand that is out there.
We must as a group, as parliamentarians, as all stripes, all levels of
government, the federal, provincial and municipal, Mr. Speaker, strive to
improve it on a daily basis.
Many times I have raised issues in Newfoundland and Labrador Housing, and
once again there are a lot of initiatives. I would not minimize some of the
initiatives that the government has taken to help out people in social housing,
help out the benefits for people, putting in strategies for people to stay in
their own homes, putting in strategies for the residential assistance program,
putting in strategies to ensure that people can find social housing. I think we
all must strive to ensure it.
Mr. Speaker, we always talk about the number of people who are in
Newfoundland and Labrador Housing and the wait-list. The wait-list has dropped.
The wait-list has dropped for people looking for social housing. Mr. Speaker, I
will just give you a stat; in 1995 to 1999, the vacancy rate in Newfoundland and
Labrador was 13 per cent. There were available apartments around, affordable
apartments, Mr. Speaker. The vacancy rate in 2011 was a little over 1 per cent.
What we see, Mr. Speaker, is the need for apartments. Once there is demand on
apartments, the cost rises that a lot of people who could afford apartments
years ago cannot afford them now. What happens, Mr. Speaker, the need for social
housing increases. *That there is just geography, that there is because of the
oil boom in around the St. John's area and other areas of development. That is
why we find that the vacancy rate is much lower now, that people who need social
housing, their increase has gone up because their ability to find something that
they can afford, something that they need, has decreased, and their power has
diminished to find apartments. Therefore they seek social housing, Mr. Speaker,
and other ways to stay in their own homes, as we mentioned, through residential
assistance programs.
Mr. Speaker, as we see, a lot of times, we see with Newfoundland and Labrador
Housing, there is almost some kind of stigma put to it, but we have to realize:
around 70 per cent of people right now who are looking for some kind of housing
or are in rental housing right now as we speak, Mr. Speaker, are not in
Newfoundland and Labrador Housing; 74 per cent of people who rent are not in
Newfoundland and Labrador Housing. The idea is, if there is some way that we can
help a lot of people because what happens with 74 per cent in rental units all
across Newfoundland and Labrador is as the rent goes up, their ability to stay
in their apartments and look for affordable housing decreases. This is a major
concern.
This comes sometimes when you get an influx, for example, for the Northeast
Avalon; when we get an influx, and, Mr. Speaker, when everybody is building the
new houses, and apartments are less, and you have the university town, the
people who sometimes can afford a level of rental cannot afford it. That is a
major concern for all of us.
Another thing that is a major concern for all of us, Mr. Speaker, is the
average rent. The two-bedroom apartment in 2009-2010 went up 9 per cent, so what
we see is a major increase in rental going up to this level, Mr. Speaker, but
yet the inflation rate is down to about 2 per cent, a little over 2 per cent.
What we see is the inflation rate is down low, but a skyrocketing rate for rent.
What happens then is that puts a lot of people out of the range to be able to
keep their rent, find new apartments, and stay in their own apartments. I say to
the minister that puts extra demands on Newfoundland and Labrador Housing for
social housing and other things.
Mr. Speaker, these are all concerns that we have to address as a society. By
no means would I ever suggest that the minister or this government can solve all
these problems overnight. It cannot happen, Mr. Speaker, but I do have to raise
the issue that there are concerns out there that we all have to strive together
to work towards.
Mr. Speaker, I know the Member for St. John's West just mentioned the
amendment about not setting up another division. I agree with that 100 per cent.
I agree; if we put in another layer of bureaucracy I feel that the
Newfoundland and Labrador Housing Corporation, now under the minister, is
capable of handling, working towards, and striving towards their goal.
I will support the amendment that was made by the minister, because I feel
that they are doing a great job. It is a tough job, Mr. Speaker, and if anybody
some of us have more dealings with Newfoundland and Labrador Housing than
others. Some of us realize the tough positions that some of those staff are put
into, because demand is high and sometimes geography changes, demographic
changes, the social need changes, and the housing changes; it is whole mirror of
problems. The more initiatives that we could put in to keep people in their own
homes, Mr. Speaker, are going to alleviate problem and help with it.
Another concern that I have to raise, Mr. Speaker and I raised this during
Estimates with the minister, and I know the minister is aware of it, and I know
there are changes being made, but it is a concern out on the West Coast: 80 per
cent of all the units, Newfoundland and Labrador Housing units, are all three
and four bedrooms now. This is not a blame game here with me; this is not a
blame game. This is just the reality of what we took over; 80 per cent are three
and four bedrooms. Eighty per cent of all requests are for one and two bedrooms.
It is a major concern.
I know during Estimates, the minister mentioned that there are improvements
to be made; they are putting money, when they can, into making renovations, even
doing some new initiatives to separate some, trying to make one a one bedroom
and the other into two bedrooms, separating them. I applaud the minister and the
government for that, because what happens when someone goes into a three- or
four-bedroom apartment is that the heat goes up and the maintenance goes up. The
other initiatives that they had, Mr. Speaker, go up, not only for the residents
that have to heat, but for Newfoundland and Labrador Housing, for the unit
itself. That is a concern. I know the minister and the department are looking at
it. I know the minister has made some changes to it; that is just another
initiative that we must look at.
In closing, Mr. Speaker, I just want to say that people with disabilities is
another major issue. I know our government took the lead and our Province took
the lead in the social design for housing all across Canada. I applaud the
minister and I applaud the government for that. Mr. Speaker, I have been
involved with housing for people with disabilities for a number of years. It
does me a great pleasure to know that our government and our Province took the
lead to have the international design for people with social housing being set
up now.
The other thing we have to try to ensure, Mr. Speaker, and this is not more
of a Newfoundland and Labrador Housing issue but it incorporates it, is trying
to find some way we can get some extra services into some of the units for
seniors so people can stay in the units. I will mention to the minister about
the one out in Corner Brook. I know it is not the minister's responsibility, Mr.
Speaker, but if there were more units made for people with disabilities, so if a
senior happens to take a stroke or if a senior happens to become less mobile
they can still stay in the same unit which they call home. I know that it is a
private business. Mr. Speaker, those are just some concerns I have with
Newfoundland and Labrador Housing.
There are some good initiatives. I will not stand up here and say that there
have not been some improvements made. I know the wait-list has dropped. I also
know the request for the RRAP program has decreased. I do not think it will ever
go away. We have to strive to look at new initiatives and look at new ways.
Mr. Speaker, I will be supporting the amendments made by the Member for St.
John's West. I will be supporting those amendments because there are some good
initiatives. It is like anything else we do as parliamentarians, we have to
strive to make things better and we have to strive to work together to ensure
that people in social housing and who need the social programs, are there when
they need it.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
The hon. the Minister Responsible for the Newfoundland and Labrador Housing
Corporation.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. HEDDERSON: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I am delighted to be able to get on my feet in this hon. House today and to
speak once again on housing and the housing challenges that are presented to not
only this government but to the people of Newfoundland and Labrador. Mr.
Speaker, I would say to you these challenges are many. There is no doubt in
anyone's mind that housing is a right and a right that must be protected.
Certainly, this government over its last couple of terms has made tremendous
strides.
I welcome the words from the Official Opposition as I believe, because the
member who just spoke was a member back in the 1990s. I think he remembers well
the challenges that were presented. We had a stock of well over 5,000 units that
were deteriorating, dollars were few and challenges were many. These housing
units, and the Housing Corp. itself, trying to maintain these with very little
in the way of resources, working hard.
Fortunately, as we came into government in 2003 on to 2004, our fortunes
changed and we did put significant dollars in the right places. We are moving
along in such a manner that we are addressing not only the infrastructure
deficit that was presented, but also using programs as tools to basically
address the challenges that are presented to the government and to the people of
Newfoundland and Labrador; especially those, I would say, Mr. Speaker, who find
themselves, what we call, in vulnerable situations. It is these people in
vulnerable situations who find themselves looking for better housing. The onus
is on us as a government to make sure that we have a plan, and a plan that is
not just on a day to day but takes into account what is happening and how we are
going to address it over a period of years.
In this particular case, in 2007, we did put forth a plan. That plan, Secure
Foundations, has already proven itself to be the proper direction as we go
forward. A plan, I would say, Mr. Speaker, that did not just drop out of the
sky. There were extensive consultations throughout the Province to bring to
government the needs, the challenges and the way forward. Mr. Speaker, the
hundreds of people who were involved in those consultations gave us the
directions. As a matter of fact, I would go so far as to say that we do not take
ownership of the plan as much as the people who came to us are the owners of
that particular plan. They are the ones who said to government, this is the
direction that you should be going into. We listened, we put a framework in
place, and now we find ourselves in an excellent position, Mr. Speaker, four,
five years into the plan where there have been tremendous differences in how we
deal with housing issues.
Mr. Speaker, as well, I compliment the Member for St. John's West. This is
not the first time that he has been on his feet asking this House to support
this government in its plan for affordable housing, social affordable housing,
and housing affordability, I would say as well, Mr. Speaker. Of course, we put
forth a motion, or I should say he put forth a motion a number of weeks back.
Again, it was kind of disappointing, Mr. Speaker, to find that members opposite
did not see fit to stand and support his motion, which was a motion that asked
basically for the House to endorse what this government is doing in going out
and investing heavily in trying to make sure that we are providing for the
people of Newfoundland and Labrador.
Mr. Speaker, they did not stand for 1,300 modifications to private homes to
make them more accessible. What did they vote against? They voted against 1,100
social housing units. They voted against expanded rent supplements. They voted
against a reduction in rent from 30 per cent of gross income to 25 per cent of
net income. They voted against residential energy efficiency grants for 4,300
low-income homeowners, and more, Mr. Speaker.
Of course, the Member for St. John's Centre stood up days ago, as a matter of
fact it was last week, and the first line in her motion is, "WHEREAS the
Provincial Government currently only has a strategy for social housing that does
not deal with the full crisis of affordable housing in the Province". Now, Mr.
Speaker, we ran in this term on a Blue Book that specifically states that we
will be looking to find ways to address housing affordability in this Province
of Newfoundland and Labrador. I say to the hon. member, we are what, six months
in? We indicate that we are going to do it. We have committed to do it, and we
are going to do it; but, we are not going to do it as I rose in the House the
other day. We are not going to do without going to the people who this is going
to serve. We are not going to go without going to the partners that we need in
order to make this a successful program. When you look at a Blue Book, Mr.
Speaker, this is not about a four month and you do not all come in and wave a
magic wand and say, okay, everything we promised, here it is.
I ask the Third Party to maybe have a little bit of patience, and to own up
to the fact that this government has committed to it and we are going to get to
it. Basically, you have to consider that there is a process that goes in place.
This is a change. When we get to the Third Party, again, all I can hear when
they get on their feet is more, more, more and more. I can understand that. I
would like nothing else than for this government to say you have a blank cheque,
Mr. Minister, do what you like with it. That would be excellent; however, there
is a responsibility that goes with any government in making sure that they are
fiscally responsible. I tell you that when we look at the Housing Corp. of
Newfoundland and Labrador, they have strategically petitioned government for
funds they can invest in the housing corp. that will bring about the needed
changes that we need as we continue to move forward.
Again, Mr. Speaker, this government does have a plan. It is a plan that is
accepted by all of our partners out in the Province of Newfoundland and
Labrador. They were the ones that came forward, and every year we review with
those same people to ask them direction as we go forward. It is a work in
progress. Has it solved all of the problems and all of the challenges? No, I
say, Mr. Speaker, but it has set the groundwork to ensure that we are moving
forward in the right direction and a direction that we are satisfied as a
government is meeting the needs of the people outside.
The second
WHEREAS is, "WHEREAS the home ownership assistance program
promised by this Government in the provincial election has not come to
fruition".
Again, if you can simply put a program together in six months, I suggest that
your cry would be but you have not consulted with anybody. You have not asked
anybody. In six months you have thrown in this program, yet you have not done
the consultation. As a matter of fact, I have heard that on other things, again,
from the Third Party. You have to give the time that is required. This is not
just a willy-nilly, let's get on it. We have to make sure that we are doing it
properly.
You will notice that there are parts of this motion that we have not touched.
The third
WHEREAS is, "WHEREAS shelter is a human right and all people in the
Province have the right to housing that meets the national occupancy standards".
Listen, there is no member in this House going to stand up and say we need to
amend that. I believe all of us are on the same page when it comes to the fact
that we want to make sure that the people of this Province are adequately served
with housing.
The next
WHEREAS: passed a motion to provide the federal government should
keep again, a statement that we all can certainly agree with.
When it gets to the THEREFORE, "urge Government to commit to a provincial
housing and homelessness action plan."
Give us a break! How many times do we have to say that we have a plan? How
many times do we have to say that the plan is working? How many times do we have
to say that it is a plan that was put together by the people of Newfoundland and
Labrador who have vested interest in making sure that plan is doing what it
should be?
AN HON. MEMBER: All the stakeholders.
MR. HEDDERSON: It is all the stakeholders.
"BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the House of Assembly urge Government to call
upon the Federal Government to renew the Homelessness Partnering Strategy, the
Affordable Housing Initiative", we had to amend that because, again, it is not
accurate and our amendment will point to the fact of the agreement that we do
have with the federal government. There is nothing of any malice there. It is
just making sure that it is factually correct.
"BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the House of Assembly urge Government to create
a Division of Housing and Homelessness." Again, I say, if that is your answer
to the housing challenges that we have in Newfoundland and Labrador, that we are
going to set up another division I keep asking you to list off what that
division would do and I have not gotten a response back. From what I have heard
peripherally you are talking about the exact same thing that we are doing in the
Housing Corporation, and coupled with Service Newfoundland and Labrador with the
Residential Tenancies Act, we are covered off. As well, I have a minister's
committee within government, I have a deputy minister's committee within
government, I have an interdisciplinary committee within government that deal
with the overall picture of housing in the Province and has government reacting
to it.
I do not know how many levels that you want to create, but if that is the
most creative thing that you can put forward the Official Opposition do not
even agree with you. I think that if there is anyone's house that should be in
order, I think you should get yours because you need to. I will be surprised if
in your responses you do not talk about something universal because that seems
to be a mantra with you as well. Everything has to be universal.
I say to the Third Party that you have to make sure that you are serving the
people you say you are serving and make sure that when you are going forward
again, with regard to the Third Party, it is about a new division, get a plan,
and as well somewhere along the way you were going to build more units until you
found out that those fifty units or so are included in our affordability with
our partnership with the federal government and that we are indeed doing that.
Again, I am at a loss. This is the second time we have asked the Third Party to
join all of us in making sure that as we move forward we are doing as we should.
As well, bring it back down around to the Newfoundland and Labrador Housing
Corporation. We are very pleased with the progress the Newfoundland and Labrador
Housing Corporation has done, from a corporation that was struggling in the
1990s to get the resources, to get the direction to move forward as they should,
and to repair and maintain the units that they have. I take my hat off to the
people, in particular the CEO, who has brought that corporation to a level that
it is more than responsive to the needs of what is going on out there in
Newfoundland and Labrador.
Mr. Speaker, we are not saying we have everything solved. We have in place
the investments, the strategy, and the plan for us to move forward and to
address it. As well, with the support we get around government, in particular
Justice, Health and Community Services, and Service Newfoundland and Labrador,
we are on the right track, Mr. Speaker. For the first time in decades, we see
light at the end of the tunnel. We are determined as a government to continue to
support those people who find themselves in vulnerable situations. We will move
forward and hopefully expand to those between 40,000 and 60,000 and at that
point, Mr. Speaker, I will just hold off and thank you for the opportunity.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!
The Member for The Straits White Bay North.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. MITCHELMORE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
It is quite a pleasure to speak to the private member's motion that was put
forward by the Member for St. John's Centre. I would just like to say that the
original motion which was put forward certainly does not dismiss any of the work
that is being done by the Newfoundland and Labrador Housing Corporation. We
recognize the work they do with their mandate, which is responsible for social
housing.
When it comes to the original member's motion, it talks about the importance
of dealing with the overall provincial issue of housing and affordability. This
is why when it looks at developing a plan we recognize that there is a Social
Housing Plan that was developed in 2009, but the issue around affordable housing
is much larger than that. That is why the first resolve was talking about
developing a provincial housing and homelessness plan.
We recognize that government has programs and services developed for that
plan and many of them are very good and very well implemented. However, Mr.
Speaker, housing is an absolute right, it is a need, it is a basic, and it is a
driver for economic sustainability in many areas. Everybody needs shelter. If we
look at it in that way and we look at the engine of which housing can be, then
we can really build some momentum here in Newfoundland and Labrador on that.
If we look at the MHA for St. John's Centre, and myself as the MHA for The
Straits White Bay North, we hosted a housing road show with public
consultations across the Province, in areas such as: St. Anthony, Norris Point,
Stephenville, Corner Brook, Grand Falls-Windsor, Clarenville, St. John's, and
there was also added Marystown, and Happy Valley-Goose Bay. There we listened,
Mr. Speaker. We listened to the challenges of affordable housing and housing
affordability that is growing both for the rural areas, suburban and urban
centres.
I would like to highlight some of those issues, some of those suggestions and
matters pertaining to affordable housing and housing affordability. Just in my
very own district and it is not just about Newfoundland and Labrador Housing,
because we are currently facing a shortage of those units but also other units
and rental spaces in the district. When a Newfoundland and Labrador Housing unit
becomes available, there is certainly more than one call to fill it.
We also have apartment units in the area that have been purchased and tenants
are given advance notice to move out. It is done in due process; however,
finding a space to rent in an area where there is a less than 1 per cent vacancy
rate, that is considered by real estate agents when it is at less than 3 per
cent it is at nil. It creates real challenges and this is where we need to plan,
a plan for the economy so that we can grow it. In order to do so, we see that
when the rental rate is at less than 1 per cent, there are gaps for the current
renters, gaps for students in student housing, gaps for professionals and for
when there are projects. We need to work with the stakeholders to develop and
devise that land use plan and look at this.
I have had cases, Mr. Speaker, where professionals have accepted jobs to move
into the Town of St. Anthony and they have not moved in because there is no
available space for them to live that is affordable. While we were on our
housing road show, we were in Stephenville, and professionals had talked to us
and said: We have left the Town of St. Anthony because there was no affordable
housing there for us as a professional that is available. So, having adequate
stock is something that we need to look at and plan for.
There are several needs when we look at supportive housing to keep people
close to home. If we look at the shortage of another group of seniors, we have
long-term care facilities in the Province that have no vacancies. This has
impacts. It has impacts on personal care homes that deal with Level I and Level
II care, where they have greater stress on them to hold residents maybe a little
longer, where they have to end up going to a hospital to get that tertiary care.
I have had people who have been out of hospital for fifteen months-plus, who
have not been able to get to that long-term care facility to deal with that
Level III care. That is adding quite a cost.
There has to be an adequate plan to deal around all of these issues, because
if we have seniors' housing units that deal with independent living and then to
make that level advancement to the next step where they need a Level I or a
Level II care, then there needs to be an available space for them. So those are
issues that we have to look at. We have to work with it, and this is why we are
calling on a division of ho