British Columbia Hansard — TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2005 (37th Parliament, 6th Session) (20050215am-Hansard-v27n7)
20050215am-Hansard-v27n7
British Columbia — Debates (Hansard)
2005 Legislative Session: 6th Session, 37th Parliament
HANSARD
The following electronic version is for informational purposes
only.
The printed version remains the official version.
Official Report of
DEBATES OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY
(Hansard)
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2005
Morning Sitting
Volume 27, Number 7
CONTENTS
Routine Proceedings
Page
Throne Speech Debate
(continued)
Hon. J. Les
Hon. P. Sahota
Hon. I. Chong
Hon. R. Coleman
M. Hunter
[ Page 11869 ]
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2005
The House met at 10:03 a.m.
Prayers.
Orders of the Day
Hon. G. Bruce: I call Address in Reply to the throne
speech.
[1005]
Throne Speech Debate
(continued)
Hon. J. Les: It's a great pleasure for me to rise in my
place this morning and reply to the Speech from the Throne, which was delivered
by Her Honour last week. As I listened to the speech, I reflected on what a
change we have seen transpire across British Columbia over the last four years.
I think that once in a while it's useful for us to think back and
reflect on the province as it was in 2001. We all remember the decade of decline
of the 1990s when British Columbians had, frankly, lost hope. They had lost
their economic courage and vision that had for so long described British
Columbia. We had gone from a province that was accustomed to being an economic
leader in Canada to a province that was behind almost every other province in
Canada in terms of pretty well every economic measurement that you could
imagine. It had gotten to the point where double-digit unemployment was the rule
in most areas of the province; where new investment across the province was
rare; and where, on a net basis, people were leaving British Columbia. All in
all, not a very pretty picture.
When we ran for election in 2001, we drew up a road map. It was
called the New Era document. It contained in excess of 200 solid
commitments. It laid out how the province was going to get itself back to
economic prosperity in a way that was deliberate, in a way that was prudent and
in a way that committed to British Columbians very exactly how we were going to
do that.
When we look at it now, almost four years later, I'm so pleased to
be able to report that in excess of 95 percent of the commitments that were made
in the New Era document either have been fully completed or are well on
their way to completion. That is a tremendous achievement. Never before, I
believe, in the history of British Columbia has any government set out so
clearly what it was going to do and then followed through so completely, as our
government has done.
I think it's clear today, as well, that the results speak for
themselves. As I've travelled around the province over the last number of
months, it is obvious that there is renewed hope and increased confidence across
British Columbia in every area of the province and in every sector of our
economy.
Those who measure these things, like the Canadian Federation of
Independent Business and other groups like that, report consistently that
quarter after quarter, British Columbians and British Columbia business people
are more confident about the future than Canadians in any other province of
Canada. That confidence is certainly founded on the economic turnaround that has
been accomplished with the economic policies we've put in place.
I should review some of the major pillars of that economic
turnaround. First of all, as everyone knows, on June 6, 2001, the then Finance
minister announced the largest-ever tax decrease in the history of British
Columbia. That was followed very quickly by the opposition reminding British
Columbians constantly: "Tax cuts don't work."
Well, several years have unfolded since, and it has become very,
very clear — it is abundantly clear to anyone who cares about economics — that
the tax cuts we implemented on June 6, 2001, have worked very, very well. In
every sector of the economy — whether it's investment, small business growth or
tax revenue growth from the business sector — no matter what measurement you
want to apply, the tax cuts have worked as they were intended to.
[1010]
Perhaps the best measurement of how these tax cuts and our
economic policies have worked is in the increase in jobs to individual British
Columbians. British Columbia today creates more jobs than any other province in
Canada. In the last three years the economy in British Columbia has generated in
excess of 197,000 jobs for individual British Columbians.
At the end of the day, we can talk about economic statistics and
other issues like that for a long, long time, and some people will find that of
interest. But what people find really interesting on an individual basis in
every community of this province is: are they able to find a job? Are they able
to produce an income that sustains their family and that helps them to create
the future they want to have here in the province?
[J. Weisbeck in the chair.]
Increasingly, it is clear that people across British Columbia are
finding work and are finding that their wages are going up. They are, therefore,
becoming increasingly confident in their own personal economic future.
Another way that's reflected across the province is the increased
price of homes. It is only confident people who buy homes — people who are
confident about their individual future, people who are confident about the
future of British Columbia. Regardless, almost, of which community you go to in
British Columbia today, people's equities in their homes have been restored.
There were communities where people were facing negative equities previously,
where people saw the value of their homes declining year after year after year.
That sorry trend has been reversed as well. People are now seeing the value of
their most important investment in their lives increasing, and that, too, leads
to a far healthier level of confidence in communities across British Columbia.
[ Page 11870 ]
We obviously made a very bold set of policy decisions in June of
2001, and as I've already explained, it's my firm belief that these have worked
exactly as intended. We got rid of the corporate capital tax. We reduced income
taxes by the greatest amount ever in the history of the province.
Importantly, as well, we set in place a deliberate plan to reduce
the amount of regulation within British Columbia. My predecessor, the then
Minister of State for Deregulation, started out with a very carefully crafted
plan to accomplish our New Era document commitment to reduce regulation
by one-third. To give that some real credibility at the end of the day, the then
minister said: "We should be sure that we actually count the number of
regulations we have in the province so that we will have a benchmark against
which we can measure our progress three years out." It was discovered, after the
count was complete, that at that point in time in 2001, we actually had 383,000
regulations in British Columbia. Those are provincial regulations. These were
not municipal regulations; these were not federal regulations. These were
provincial regulations only. Our commitment was to reduce that by one-third.
As I took over those responsibilities a little more than a year
ago, we were, of course, very much in the thick of bringing that to the
three-year mark in June of last year. At that point we were able to report that
our achievement, actually, was a 37 percent reduction in regulations in British
Columbia. I think that, too, has played a very significant role in allowing
people to grow their businesses and create more jobs and to do so in a
regulatory environment that is results-oriented, increasingly, as opposed to
prescriptive, as it was in the past.
We've made very, very significant progress in these last almost
four years. Today British Columbia is a province where people have renewed
confidence in the future. Today British Columbia is a province where investment
is literally flowing into the province again. In many areas, British Columbia
has more investment coming in than any other province in Canada, including
Ontario.
[1015]
We are a province that is more confidently looking to the future
in terms of our role in the world. Given our geographic location on the west
coast of North America, it is becoming increasingly clear that we have some
significant assets, particularly in the ports and other transportation
infrastructure, that are going to allow British Columbia to become a major
geographic player on the international stage. Particularly with the emergence of
the economies in China and India and other Asian nations, we need to be acting
now to take advantage of those opportunities.
When I think of what those opportunities are, there is not a
better example of opportunity today than Prince Rupert and the port that is
located in Prince Rupert. I know the member for North Coast has been working
very, very hard to make sure that within the next several years the port of
Prince Rupert actually becomes one of the most important pieces of
transportation infrastructure on the North American west coast.
I want to say here and now that I fully agree with him that Prince
Rupert is going to be a major economic player in the future. I have referred,
actually, to Prince Rupert as being a future Singapore. I don't think that is
excessive hyperbole in any way, shape or form. When you look at the asset that
is the port of Prince Rupert and the role it can play, being as it is a day and
a half closer in sailing time to the Asian markets than even the port of
Vancouver and being a day and a half closer to the important markets in Chicago
by rail, it leads to only one conclusion: the future for the port of Prince
Rupert and for the community of Prince Rupert is very, very bright indeed.
I want to encourage the member for North Coast to make sure, as
far as our government is concerned, that the port of Prince Rupert stays at the
forefront and that we never lose sight of the significant economic opportunities
available to Prince Rupert and the entire province when we properly develop that
facility for the benefit of not only British Columbians but all Canadians. As
I've said before, and I'll say it again, Prince Rupert has a great future.
While we need to pay particular attention to Prince Rupert, we
also need to pay attention to the port of Vancouver and the Deltaport and the
Fraser ports, because they, too, will need to undergo significant expansion to
properly deal with the expanded trade opportunities we are going to see from
around the world. These opportunities are not just about container handling;
they are about the secondary manufacturing that can result. As these containers
come onshore and as they are handled and their contents are, for the first time,
coming together from various places around the world, we can develop from that
an entire new economy. I think, in many cases, that we have difficulty imagining
today the exact scope of the opportunities that lie before us.
As I listened to the throne speech last week, of course there were
a few things within that document that specifically related to my riding as well
— perhaps none more important than the intended future establishment of the
headquarters of the World Trade University in my riding. This is a very
significant achievement, obviously, for my riding and certainly for the province
as well.
We will become the world headquarters for this new United
Nations–mandated trade university. People, particularly from developing
countries around the world, will be coming to this campus to take further
training in international trade. These will be graduate students who are looking
for more information and more training related to international trade. The fact
that they will be coming to British Columbia gives us, I think, in this province
a great opportunity to establish ourselves as a great place to live, a great
place to invest and a place that has a very hospitable economic environment. The
residents in my riding are very enthusiastic about this new opportunity, but I
would say to all British Columbians that the new World Trade Univer-
[ Page 11871 ]
sity campus, located in Chilliwack, is going to be a significant asset to us
and our economy as we go forward.
[1020]
People in my riding have been commenting for several years now
that very obviously the economy in my riding, too, has achieved new heights
since the election of our government in 2001. Housing starts are at an all-time
high. There has been a tremendous amount of non-residential investment and
construction as well. All of that, again, is easily traced back to the new
levels of confidence that we have achieved together as British Columbians as a
result of the various policy changes we've made.
There's another reason for the excitement that is evident across
British Columbia today. That is the hosting opportunity that we have in 2010,
when we'll be hosting the Winter Olympics and Paralympic Games. That is a
world-class opportunity. I want to bring it forward one more time and remind
British Columbians how important it is that we do the very best possible job we
can of hosting these games. It is a world-class, once-in-a-lifetime opportunity
for us to showcase British Columbia.
You know, when given the opportunity, British Columbia showcases
itself so very, very successfully. We saw that in 1986 when we hosted Expo here
in British Columbia, right in Vancouver. We saw how the tourism industry
literally took off in the years after Expo 86. I am firmly convinced we are
going to see the same kind of effect before, during and after the 2010 Olympics,
as well, except that I think the impact will be that much more profound.
We need to remember that as the Olympics unfold in 2010, at least
half of the population of the world will be watching this event, right here in
British Columbia. I think it goes without saying that no other medium can buy
the kind of exposure that the Olympic opportunity brings to British Columbia.
I must say, as well, that the Olympic planning activities are well
underway. We have a very competent group in VANOC, the Vancouver organizing
committee. As far as venue construction is concerned, all of that is proceeding
very, very well. A couple of the venues have already been given the go-ahead to
start construction — the Olympic speed-skating oval, for example, in Richmond.
And in other venues, the work is well underway. There is no doubt at this point
that the venues will all be pretty much complete by 2008, allowing a year or
more of potential for those facilities to be used by the various competitors in
The Olympics are creating a significant amount of excitement
across the province. I saw a report last week that support for the Olympics has
actually increased very, very significantly across British Columbia since we
were awarded the games. That is unusual. Usually, it is the case that host
jurisdictions suffer somewhat of a decline in enthusiasm before the events
actually transpire. In our case, the enthusiasm and the support have actually
increased. I would suggest that this actually bodes very, very well and very
positively as we work towards hosting these games in 2010, which is, as we
speak, only five years away.
Related to that, there will be a lot of construction, certainly,
but I think it's important to keep that in perspective as well. A couple of
weeks ago my ministry released a report that summarized all of the construction
and investment activity across British Columbia currently on the drawing boards
and actually underway. It was found that there was about $65 billion worth of
construction contemplated and underway in British Columbia today — $65 billion
worth, Mr. Speaker.
[1025]
In that context, it's important to keep in perspective the
construction that's actually related to the Olympics, which is about $600
million, or something on the order of 1 percent. Although the Olympic
construction is significant — there's no question about that; $600 million is
significant — in terms of all the other construction that is emerging across
British Columbia, both public and private sector, I think it's important that
it's kept in perspective.
These are busy times in British Columbia. We are challenged, of
course, to ensure that we have the workforce available. It's true to say today
in British Columbia that we don't so much have workers looking for jobs as we
have jobs looking for workers, and it's a pretty happy circumstance where people
have a variety of jobs from which to choose. Classified advertisements in the
newspapers now typically run many columns in terms of jobs that are available —
again, a very nice turnaround compared to what we saw three or four years ago.
Individual British Columbians today actually have an opportunity to succeed
again.
Looking forward as a born British Columbian, having lived here all
my life, I am most pleased that we have been able to rediscover the potential of
this province in a way that fills people with confidence, fills people with
hope. In spite of the commentary we hear from our opponents from time to time, I
think many, many British Columbians today agree that we are on track again with
our economy. We are leading Canada again.
As the throne speech pointed out last week, we have many, many
opportunities before us in British Columbia, and we want to make sure we
continue to provide those opportunities and government policies that encourage
people, as opposed to those policies that tend to shut opportunities down. Our
government is committed to allowing people to achieve to the greatest extent
possible, to give people as many opportunities as possible in terms of their
business pursuits and the jobs they wish to access and also in terms of
education, for example, which is an extremely important building block in any
economy that aspires to grow and to thrive.
Happily, our government has committed itself to creating an
additional 25,000 post-secondary education seats by 2010. We are well on our way
to achieving that. There are few things our government has done that excite me
as much as that commitment to post-
[ Page 11872 ]
secondary education, in particular. Of those 25,000 seats, it's important for
me personally to point out that 1,700 of those seats are actually coming to the
University College of the Fraser Valley to provide important new opportunities
for students in the Fraser Valley as well.
It's a great time to be a British Columbian again. We have an
abundance of opportunities. We have competent government in British Columbia
today. With the opportunities before us, whether they are in the traditional
economy, whether they are in emerging technologies — biotechnology and many
others — or whether they lie in terms of taking advantage of the Olympics as a
great opportunity for the future, there are many, many things that cause British
Columbians today to take courage and to hope for the future in a way that has
not been available to us for many years.
I appreciate this opportunity to offer those few comments in reply
to the Speech from the Throne. It is, of course, the last Speech from the Throne
in the thirty-seventh parliament. I am looking forward to hitting the campaign
trail in a few short weeks. I think British Columbians will be quite excited to
discuss the progress we've made in these last four years.
Hon. P. Sahota: It's a pleasure to rise this morning on
behalf of my constituents, the constituents of Burnaby-Edmonds, and to reply to
the throne speech delivered last week by the Lieutenant-Governor. I want to talk
a little bit about what this means for my constituents, and of course, I want to
say a little bit about what it means for this new portfolio I hold, a file that
I believe represents a very important sector of our economy, the resort
industry.
[1030]
The throne speech sets the tone for the future. It sets the vision
of a government, and the vision, in my opinion, is clear. British Columbia is
about to enter into a golden decade, a decade full of promise, hope and
opportunity.
We can feel confident about the future because we know where we
have come from. We know the great adversities we have faced as a province, and
in turn, we know how those challenges affected the provincial treasury — from
9/11 to SARS to BSE to the avian flu and forest fires.
Then there were the challenges left behind by the previous
administration: the unfunded contracts and an economic climate that was toxic to
investment. In my opinion, we have met those challenges head-on. Today the hard
work of British Columbians and, of course, my colleagues in this chamber has
paid off. It has paid off to the extent that we can now say that the best is yet
to come.
Our tough decisions are paying off. B.C.'s budget is balanced. Our
economy is growing by leaps and bounds. We're ready to bring the world here, be
it for the 2006 World Junior Hockey Championship or the 2009 World Police and
Fire Games, which is the second-largest event outside of the Summer Olympics. Of
course, the eyes of the world will be on us when we host the world with the 2010
Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games.
The throne speech touched on a number of issues. I want to talk
about a few of those that I believe are important to the future well-being of
our province.
The Asian subcontinent is a key to the well-being of this
province. I have previously spoken about diversifying our markets, especially
when it comes to our forest industry. The Premier has travelled to China, and a
number of my colleagues have participated in other trade missions to China and
Hong Kong. Of course, I had the opportunity to travel with the Premier to India
in 2003.
China and India — these two countries are emerging economically on
the world scene. I have always maintained that both of these countries are very
important for British Columbia's future, as they are the world's fastest-growing
commercial economies. I believe that it is important for us as government to
show that these two emerging markets are places where we as British Columbians
want to do business.
I'm happy to know that the government is responding on a number of
fronts. We will soon appoint an Asia-Pacific trade council to advise the
government, and our government will establish a network of B.C. trade and
cultural centres in major international markets to promote homegrown and
made-in-B.C. products. This is the right thing to do and is another step in
securing a future that is full of possibility for British Columbians.
Of course, relevant to this is that we will appoint a B.C.
competition council to conduct a comprehensive review of B.C.'s competitiveness
in every sector, pinpoint the barriers to growth and identify solutions to
overcome them. This is crucial to our future. When I was travelling in India,
the Indians made it very clear to us that their competition is not us. Their
competition is China.
We here in British Columbia should be very clear that our
competition is global. As British Columbians, we have to make sure our
prospective markets know about the competitive products that B.C. and Canada
offer in a variety of industries. As we continue our efforts to diversify and
expand our markets and our economy, it is crucial that we remain competitive.
Thus a Resort file is also crucial, because it is about diversifying our markets
abroad and diversifying our rural communities at home. We have to make sure,
through it all, that the industry is competitive and that we create a
world-class resort industry.
I want to talk a little bit about that. I want to talk a little
bit about the Resort file and the Resort strategy and action plan, which I
believe is very important to the economic well-being of our province. Currently,
there are about 700 resorts in B.C., ranging from small, remote fishing lodges
to world-class destination resorts, together employing more than 26,000 people.
I can't emphasize enough the size of this opportunity and the calibre of people
and investment it can attract.
For instance, of the $10 billion generated by our tourism sector,
about $2 billion of that comes from re-
[ Page 11873 ]
sorts. This $2 billion doesn't include related direct spending, which also
comes close to $2 billion. Nor does it include annual tax revenues of more than
$178 million.
We have a conservative projection of $4.1 billion of new capital
investment and thousands of new jobs for British Columbians throughout the
province, and this does not include what is taking place on private land. All
one has to do is look around the province. All over B.C. the resort industry is
growing at a phenomenal pace.
[1035]
For example, Big White in Kelowna is making a $250 million
investment in additional resort development that includes a ski and snowboard
terrain park, a new day lodge and expanding ski terrain by 200 acres. Peak
season will see 1,100 jobs at this resort. Sun Peaks, in Kamloops, is planning
the completion of their phase 2, a $270 million expansion which will see 6,000
additional bed units. Then there's Red Mountain in Rossland in the Kootenays.
They plan on investing approximately $33 million over the next two years to
upgrade lifts and expand the ski terrain, not to mention the significant
residential investment, bringing people and jobs to Rossland and the surrounding
communities.
These are just ski resorts, but the list goes on and on and
encompasses a number of different resorts, from golf destinations to marine
resorts and wellness centres. We have proposals on the table for resorts in
Squamish, Invermere, Blue River, Nelson, Osoyoos and Revelstoke. There are
expansion plans at Kicking Horse and the new Greg Norman golf course in Fernie.
This ministry is also working closely with other agencies like
Land and Water B.C., key provincial agencies, local government, industry and
stakeholders to implement strategies that will encourage growth and investment
in our rural communities. As we head towards 2010, I believe our resorts will
become economic catalysts that showcase not just our scenery but also our
communities, our lifestyle and the other industry sectors that make up the new
British Columbia economy. I am proud of the fact that our resort sector is
playing a growing and important role in helping to diversify this incredible
province and in helping to create a golden decade of growth, opportunity and
success.
As I mentioned earlier, I can't emphasize enough the Asia-Pacific
gateway strategy mentioned in the throne speech, which I believe will be
critical to our success. Of course, integral to this is tourism, which is also
part of the strategy and builds on our already successful all-seasons Resort
strategy and action plan. These initiatives will create thousands of new jobs,
and in terms of the Resort strategy, it's already creating investment in all
regions of our province. The Asia-Pacific gateway strategy will also promote our
products to the world and open doors for new cultural exchanges, new
relationships and partnerships in education.
I also want to touch on another issue mentioned in the throne
speech: a new Premier's council on aging and seniors issues. It will identify
opportunities to improve seniors services and examine how to improve housing
options and home care — and of course, on the issue of mandatory retirement,
make recommendations on how to improve this particular issue.
I have previously spoken about mandatory retirement in this House.
I've said what we need is to be flexible and adaptable and to find unique ways
to fit the changing world around us. We need to be creative in the face of
challenges. It is important that this discussion begin, especially when you look
at our demographics. According to the Canadian Urban Futures Institute, 9.8
million Canadian baby-boomers are approaching retirement. The number for this
year is 225,000. By 2020 the number retiring every year will be 425,000.
Today there are six workers for every retired person. By 2020
there will be three workers for every retired person. Thus as the workforce
decreases, it still has to maintain or pay for the increasing number of people
over 65. In addition, we're healthier than ever before, so we're living much
longer. In fact, when the age of 70 was selected in the early twentieth century
as the age of eligibility for the government pension, life expectancy was 60 to
65. Today Canadians who reach 65 are expected to live another 20 years, which is
good news, I think, for all of us.
It is crucial that we remain flexible and adaptable and continue
to find unique ways to fit the changing world around us. I am proud of the fact
that this government will now give this issue consideration.
The throne speech also spoke to the importance of education. In
terms of education the One World scholarship program announced in the speech
will assist students from British Columbia to earn their degrees and diplomas in
non–G-8 countries and will be of great benefit to young British Columbians. In
Burnaby-Edmonds, with so many of my constituents already holding close ties to
Asia-Pacific countries such as India and China, this is indeed good news. Not
only will it assist students, it will also create new relationships and expand
existing relationships around the world and raise our province's profile and
recognition.
[1040]
In addition, Chilliwack is set to be the new global home for the
World Trade University. This university, in partnership with the United Nations,
will offer graduate-level programs in trade-related fields and will host
international trade conferences and events.
Our government will also soon increase support of
Punjabi, Mandarin and other languages of the Asia-Pacific. We will also launch
new initiatives that will make more services and resources available in other
languages.
I know full well from listening to my constituents that securing
Canadian credentials continues to be a frustrating experience for many from
South Asian, Asian and other communities. I was happy to see that our government
has not overlooked this problem and has pledged to speed up the process and
allow new-
[ Page 11874 ]
comers to British Columbia to practise in the profession in which they were
trained.
These initiatives outlined in this throne speech speak to my
constituency, a constituency that is very diverse and multicultural in nature.
One of our strongest assets is the diversity of this province. I believe the
path set out in this throne speech speaks to our diversity. We are a province
that is reaching out to the world. British Columbians have long been recognized
as being open to the world. Ours is a province built through the hard work and
perseverance of people from different cultures working together. That is why I'm
proud to stand here today and support last week's throne speech.
Hon. I. Chong: I would like to begin by taking this
opportunity to welcome to this House the new member for Surrey–Panorama Ridge
and you, Deputy Speaker, on your return in your role, as well as to offer my
very good wishes to those who will be leaving provincial public office — that
they have a long and fulfilling life and continue to enjoy the province that is
going to be built before them.
From my first provincial election in 1996 to this point some nine
years later, I still feel a sense of excitement. I still feel a sense of
privilege that the constituents of Oak Bay–Gordon Head have bestowed on me this
incredible honour of representing them here in this Legislature. When you think
about it, over four million people…. We in this House are 79 of those four
million people, and we get to come to this Legislature to speak on their behalf,
to represent them, to make changes, to offer policy, to bring their ideas
forward and to act on them. That's what is important for all of us to remember,
and I, each and every day, recognize, acknowledge and am grateful for that.
Yes, this is an honourable profession, and I'm truly honoured to
serve as an MLA. Today as I rise to offer my reply to the throne speech — the
tenth one, I believe — I am particularly excited, because this year's throne
speech lays out an incredible and, more importantly, achievable vision, a vision
for the future. It's a future of more jobs, more investment and a better future
for our citizens. It's about a future where we enjoy the benefits of a healthier
society, where we have access to quality education, a safer future based on
confidence and optimism and, ultimately, a new world of possibilities.
It is about where we wish to take this province. It is about how
we wish to engage all British Columbians. I think it's fair to state that when
all members in this House seek public office, they do so in order to serve their
community and their province. How we get there from here — well, there are
certainly different approaches. I believe the approach that our government has
taken thus far is the one that best meets the needs of our province.
The throne speech speaks about moving towards a golden decade. Why
would the opposition…? Why would Carole James and the NDP object to that? We
want a province that is viewed as a leader in this country, we want a province
that is envied as the best place on earth, and we want a province that reaches
its fullest potential. Again I ask: what do Carole James and the NDP have
against that? Why do they want to take us back? Why do they want to take us back
to a decade of decline?
[1045]
Our government sees a golden decade where opportunities exist. The
NDP and Carole James prefer a decade of decline. I say we can't afford to go
backwards. We can't afford to go back to losing jobs and losing our young people
to other provinces. We can't afford to go back to the worst-performing economy
in this country. We can't afford to go back to stifling our small business. In
short, we can't afford to go back.
When I was in opposition, I had the opportunity to travel around
this province, and I travelled to places on the Island here and to places in the
interior, even to places like Prince Rupert, where the member for North Coast
resides. I remember when I travelled the province, when I went to Prince Rupert.
I did so as a member of the Select Standing Committee on Finance. I heard from
the people in Prince Rupert and I heard from the member for North Coast, who
indicated to me — at that time he wasn't the member, but I know he was
considering seeking public office — how important it was to realize the
potential of Prince Rupert and of its deep-sea port.
As I travelled around the province, I heard from many communities
like Prince Rupert. I heard that they saw potential but that the previous
government just didn't let them unleash it.
I also had the opportunity last year, when I was appointed
Minister of State for Women's and Seniors' Services, to again travel around the
province in another capacity. That was to reach out to a number of our
communities who provide services to women who are escaping violence. I visited
over a third of our transition houses, I believe around 22 of them, and I spoke
to our service providers. I happened to go to Prince Rupert as well, and I saw
exactly what they were doing. I saw things in Cranbrook. I saw things on the
upper parts of the Island here, even on the lower mainland.
I saw how each and every community said: "We need to be able to
provide the services to our community in our own distinct ways." For that reason
I am proud to see in our throne speech acknowledgment and recognition of the
largest-ever increase being provided to our women's services programs: $37.5
million over the next three years — a greater than 30 percent increase to those
services. I am proud to see that the new Minister of State for Women's and
Seniors' Services was able to speak on that issue at open cabinet not long ago.
As well, in my new role as the Minister of Advanced Education I
recently attended a new campus opening in Prince Rupert. Prince Rupert seems to
have a lot of opportunity. When I was there, I was privileged to participate in
this new campus opening. Again, it showed me how we were reaching out and
allowing
[ Page 11875 ]
these communities to realize their potential, but more importantly, it was
the first opportunity that I had to open a campus in my new portfolio.
I do want to talk about my new portfolio. Before I do so, I want
to talk about what other members of this House have already indicated, and that
is about the throne speech as a vision of going forward, about the five specific
goals that have been identified to ensure that we will realize this golden
decade. Again, I think they're worth repeating.
Those five goals are: to make B.C. the best-educated and most
literate jurisdiction not just in Canada but on the continent; to lead the way
in North America in healthy living and physical fitness; to build the best
system of support in Canada for persons with disabilities, special needs,
children at risk and seniors; to lead the world in sustainable environmental
management, with the best air and water quality and the best fisheries
management, bar none; and lastly, to create more jobs per capita than anywhere
else in Canada. Those five goals reach every community, speak to every British
Columbian and allow each and every one of us to participate in the golden decade
ahead.
As the new Minister of Advanced Education I am extremely excited
about that first goal — being the best-educated, most literate jurisdiction on
the continent — because we are already embarking on that. We are already setting
out how we're going to achieve that. We are reinforcing our intention to build a
better post-secondary system through an investment plan that will create 25,000
new student spaces by the year 2010. That is the largest strategic expansion of
post-secondary seats in 40 years. We're doing that by balancing the needs of
taxpayers, of students and of the province and its exemplary post-secondary
system. By increasing access we will take our advanced education system to an
even higher level.
[1050]
To ensure that students have room to learn we have made an overall
financial commitment of almost $800 million to new infrastructure projects. This
investment will ensure that our government delivers on its promise to ensure
that Thompson Rivers University in Kamloops is ready to join UBC Okanagan as
they become B.C.'s newest universities. This is really wonderful news for all
British Columbians, particularly those in the interior.
To fully support new student spaces we have increased funding for
post-secondary education, as compared to our original service plan, by about
$132 million over the next three years. Together with the funding increase
announced last year, the operating budget for advanced education will be $195
million higher by 2007 than it was in 2004, and that is over and above the
original ministry budget of $1.9 billion.
Why are we doing that? Well, we're doing it because our students
and their families deserve to benefit from the very best post-secondary
education available, and we are committed to providing them with access to just
this kind of quality education.
Our new funding will provide the capacity needed to moderate
rising tuition costs, which are a concern to many B.C. families. This was a
tough but necessary choice, but it is also a choice that had to be made. Today
in British Columbia tuition fees are just slightly above the national average.
Although tuition fee increases did decline at public institutions this year, we
remain concerned about the long term. We recognize the need to keep the cost of
post-secondary education down for students as best we can, and we believe that
by allowing tuition fees to rise to just above the national average, we are now
in a position to ask that tuition be limited to the rate of inflation. We also
recognize the impact on our public post-secondary institutions, so we will be
engaging them in the coming months to find the best way to ensure that they can
meet this objective, beginning this September.
Ultimately, we must be cost competitive to ensure that our
students have the same ability as other Canadians to enjoy access to high
quality post-secondary education. But we also recognize that no matter how well
institutions hold the line on tuition, money can still be a barrier to higher
learning.
British Columbia has very comprehensive, flexible student
assistance programs that relieve financial pressure for students in need. Our
Speech from the Throne signals this government's intention to enable students to
earn more while they learn, reducing dependency on debt. I am proud to say that
student aid will be further enhanced with an income exemption that will allow
our students to earn more than they previously could without reducing their
eligibility for student loans and grants. This measure builds on the $450
million that we will provide for a comprehensive student financial assistance
system over the next three years, including loan reduction for students most in
need, grants for students with disabilities, debt relief programs and loan
forgiveness programs. This program includes provision for over $300 million
annually for funding student loans.
To compete, British Columbia's post-secondary system must ensure
students are provided with a world-class education. That is why we were also
very pleased to announce plans to make British Columbia the global headquarters
for the World Trade University in Chilliwack. This global education partnership
will enable our students to benefit from the delivery of advanced education
programs in world trade, offering world trade services and organizing global
platform events and initiatives such as the World Trade Forum here in British
Columbia, in Chilliwack.
Our Speech from the Throne builds on a growing legacy and a
commitment to higher learning that is integral to the Premier's literacy
initiative and our plans to ensure that every student with a B average or higher
can access the education they need to pursue their hopes and dreams. I believe
that is an important initiative or area that we need to stress.
[1055]
When we heard in the past few years that students with an A
average were still being denied access to a post-secondary space, that was not
acceptable. That is one of the reasons why we are making such a large
[ Page 11876 ]
investment in our post-secondary institutions, our post-secondary system,
because it means that students with a B average should have access to a
university space.
Allow me as well to take a few minutes to highlight some of our
significant achievements. It is not by any means an exhaustive list, but it will
give you a good idea of what we have accomplished in three short years. We have
already increased student spaces by 3,217 in the year '04-05 on top of the 5,857
spaces over the previous two years. That brings us to a total of over 9,000
seats to date. This has increased access to college and university programs for
B.C. students. The seats added this year alone mark the first year of our
six-year commitment to add those 25,000 new seats by 2010. This will be
providing almost 186,000 seats per year for students in B.C.'s public
post-secondary system. The new university and college in the Okanagan, UBC
Okanagan and Okanagan College, will add about 5,500 new seats in the Okanagan
region alone by 2009-10, Mr. Speaker — one of the fastest-growing areas. And I
know you, personally, well know that.
The new Thompson Rivers University in Kamloops, on the other hand,
will take on the functions of Open University and Open College and the
University College of the Cariboo. This special-purpose university will focus
primarily on undergraduate and distance education while still maintaining
programs to address the applied education and skills training needs throughout
the region, and I look forward to introducing legislation in this House in the
very near future to ensure that this happens.
Since June 2001 our government has provided more than $625 million
in new funding for capital projects on campuses throughout British Columbia.
This included a new campus for Northwest Community College in Prince Rupert, a
Williams Lake campus for Thompson Rivers University, a joint College of New
Caledonia and UNBC campus in Quesnel, a new trades training campus in Cloverdale
for Kwantlen University College and a $70 million campus to house SFU's
operation in Surrey. I hope the member for Surrey–Panorama Ridge realizes how
important it was to connect that campus in Surrey to SFU, Simon Fraser
University. It's going to achieve an incredible amount of attention, and I know
our government members from Surrey in this House are extremely proud of that
achievement.
We have also focused increased seats on key areas to address
projected workforce shortages, including 825 new seats in computer science and
electrical and computer engineering in 2004-05 to meet our commitment to double
the opportunity for careers in those fields — this brings the total spaces in
those programs to over 7,000, an increase of more than 50 percent since 2001-02
— and 453 new seats for nursing and other health students in 2004-05, bringing
the total increase in seats to 2,785 since 2001-02.
We also welcomed the first students to the northern medical
program, the Island medical program and the expanded Vancouver-Fraser program in
August of 2004, which together have increased the number of first-year medical
students in B.C. by 72. When the full medical training expansion is complete, we
will be graduating 224 medical students per year, nearly double the previous
total that has been in place for more than two decades. Can you imagine? For two
decades we were graduating about 128 medical students each and every year. That
is about one in 32,000 people, per capita. No wonder people were saying they
were finding it difficult to find a doctor. We will be almost doubling that to
224 per year.
As well, we have created a $45 million leading-edge endowment fund
to establish 20 research leadership chairs, and we've launched the regional
innovation chairs — $7.5 million for regional research opportunities. These
initiatives help attract and retain researchers in British Columbia and spur
research and new knowledge with long-term technological, economic and social
benefits. The regional innovation chairs also promote research and innovation in
the heartlands. To date, one research chair has received funding and another 17
chairs have received approval-in-principle at post-secondary institutions
throughout the province.
[1100]
I want to reiterate how important research is to this province.
For a province to go forward, for a province to continue to reach its potential
and advance, we need research. We need to take advantage of those technological
advances made and continue to promote research. Here in British Columbia we're
poised to do that. We're poised to retain and attract our best and our
brightest.
In the area of skill shortages, our new Industry Training
Authority has revamped B.C.'s industry training approach and is creating an
industry-driven, more flexible apprenticeship system that is attracting more
young people into the trades. The ITA has implemented a process by which
industry can bring forward proposals for new industry training programs that
address specific skill shortages. Three new training programs have already been
approved: the residential construction framing technician program, the
construction formwork technician program and the reinforcement steel installer
program — all of which are in the construction area, which we know is booming.
The ITA has also developed a more streamlined and simplified
policy framework to facilitate better access to the industry training system for
trainees and employers. Through the implementation of industry training
organizations, the ITA will have a more accurate source of sector-specific
information on existing and emerging training needs and will be in a better
position to allocate training resources accordingly.
We have started some very important work here, and I'm pleased
with the progress to date. We look forward to making even further progress to
ensure that we can fill our work shortages moving forward.
To build on the good work of the ITA, we have been working with
the Ministry of Education to develop a new industry training program for high
school students called ACE-IT, the accelerated credit enrolment in industry
training program. This program al-
[ Page 11877 ]
lows students to earn hours towards trade credentials and earn dual credit
towards their high school diploma. Many of our young people can enjoy the
program and find out early in life whether or not a trade makes sense for them.
The end result is that we are giving children choices. I have spoken to a number
of young people in this regard — grade 10, grade 11 and grade 12 students — who
are excited about this. They believe that they have a future in trades.
[H. Long in the chair.]
What's more exciting is that there are young women, young girls,
who are interested in trades training. With 52 percent of our population
represented by the female population, I think it's an incredible interest that
they're now having and that they can now actually achieve.
In health care we're also making great strides, through $134
million in capital investment to expand medical training in B.C. at a new life
sciences centre at UBC and two satellite medical training centres at UVic and
UNBC. The expanded medical program will almost double the intake of medical
graduates, as I indicated earlier, and provides opportunities and incentives for
medical students to study and practise in underserved regions. Here in Victoria
our medical students will be focused on geriatric medicine. That's important
with an aging population, particularly here on the South Island.
On the research front we're also doing great work through a total
$900 million commitment since June 2001 to research initiatives in British
Columbia. This money has enabled our government to leverage more than $600
million in additional research funding from other sources. One example of this
project is the $30 million committed to Project NEPTUNE, which leveraged an
additional $31 million from the federal government to create the world's largest
cable-linked sea floor observatory. NEPTUNE will allow researchers to monitor
fish stocks, anticipate earthquakes, develop safe oil and gas extraction methods
and monitor climate change on the west coast. That will be happening here in
this part of the province, on the South Island.
To improve choices and access, we have also opened up the system
by bringing into force the Private Career Training Institutions Act on November
22 last year and by establishing the Private Career Training Institution Agency
to oversee a new, streamlined consumer protection and accreditation model for
private career training institutions. The purpose of the new model is to bring
B.C. in line with other Canadian jurisdictions by minimizing the regulatory
burden for private career training institutions.
[1105]
These institutions will then have the opportunity to reinvest the
cost savings associated with the reduction of red tape in the expansion of their
programs. This in turn will stimulate growth in this sector for the economy,
will expand the range of learning choices for students and help address
shortages of skilled workers in various occupations, such as the health care and
the trades technical occupations.
I can show you how committed this government is to advanced
education by just looking at my own riding of Oak Bay–Gordon Head and at one of
the 27 publicly funded post-secondary institutions in this province. At the
University of Victoria, a brand-new medical program opened its doors last month
in a brand-new $12 million building equipped with the latest distance learning
technology. The Island medical program will educate doctors on Vancouver Island
for the first time, and it is part of our commitment to nearly double the number
of doctors graduating in this province. I know that the whole world is watching
this bold venture in distributed learning. When I spoke to a number of these
students, I can say how excited they were to be able to be educated here in
Victoria. Some of them have returned to Victoria for that reason.
Here in Victoria we've also provided $22 million for the
engineering and computer science complex, one of the country's most
technologically advanced facilities at the University of Victoria. It will house
labs concentrating on robotics technology, alternative energy systems, subsea
technology and applied electromagnetics.
Since we took office, the University of Victoria has been awarded
nearly $55 million in B.C. knowledge development fund grants for research
infrastructure. These investments support things like Project NEPTUNE, the
world's largest cable-linked sea floor observatory on North America's west
coast. Information gained through NEPTUNE will lead to earlier warning of
earthquakes and tsunamis, something that the entire world is now all too
familiar with, unfortunately. Information gained through NEPTUNE will lead to
more accurate estimates of commercial fish stocks, another important industry
here on the west coast. As well, this NEPTUNE project will lead to earlier
warning and improved models of climate prediction.
Then there is also Project VENUS, which is creating a network of
instruments in the ocean to observe the waters around southern Vancouver Island.
Measurements, images and sound will be delivered to scientists, managers and the
public via the fibre optic cables from three landfill sites.
There is also the ROPOS project, approved in December, which will
advance new frontiers in ocean science through the Canadian Scientific
Submersible Facility. We have also supported a supercomputer that puts B.C. at
the forefront of climate change research and that will be an asset to Canada in
international climate treaty negotiations.
These are just some of the projects we have funded at the
University of Victoria. All told, we have committed almost $90 million for
capital projects at UVic in the past four years, and in that time we have
provided nearly half a billion dollars in operating grants to UVic alone.
In the final analysis, I am proud to say that our government is
making B.C. a centre of excellence for post-secondary education that is
characterized by a vision and a strategic plan that will ensure we realize
[ Page 11878 ]
the benefits of a golden decade. Throughout the province there are shining
examples of how we are helping our students and their families, and I am
extremely proud of the tremendous work undertaken by our ministry and our
government in this regard.
Before I conclude, I want to pay tribute to the many people in
this ministry, the staff that I have had the opportunity to meet as I have gone
around to their work locations — from the staff who answer the phones and who
deal with students looking for assistance to those who are working on capital
projects and expanding our campuses and to the deputy minister and the assistant
deputy minister — all of whom have an incredible passion for post-secondary
education.
I am extremely proud to be able to be in this particular area of
responsibility. I am particularly proud to work with such a fine ministry of
dedicated individuals. I would be remiss if I did not also thank the former
Minister of Advanced Education, the now Deputy Premier and Minister of Health
Services, for laying that important groundwork to enable me to continue with
that and to ensure that we do reach British Columbia's potential.
[1110]
In the final closing moments, as well, I want to talk a little bit
about my area of Oak Bay–Gordon Head, and how I have seen many of the changes
that have happened. As I've indicated, I represent an area that has a very large
aging population, and so I was extremely pleased to see the Premier speak on
having a new Premier's council on aging.
As I travelled around the province in my previous role, I met
seniors who said they felt they needed an opportunity to share their ideas. The
Premier always said it's better to go outside government than stay within to
find those new ideas, and our seniors have them. Our seniors are living longer,
are more active and wish to participate in how we can plan for them — and not
just about health care. Housing is important. Transportation is important.
Recreational opportunities. Simply just participating and
continuing to volunteer in their communities — these are important to our
seniors, who are throughout all of our communities. I can say I have met some
incredibly phenomenal seniors who have ideas and who can't wait to offer input.
I will be offering a number of names to that council and hope they will have an
opportunity to share those ideas, if not by serving on that council, certainly
by providing input there.
As we move into this new golden decade, I think we should all be
proud of what we have achieved and where we're going. Later on today, when we
hear the budget speech, I'm sure that it will be even more good news for this
province, and I say wholeheartedly that I do support this throne speech.
Hon. R. Coleman: I am proud to stand and speak in support
of the throne speech today.
Reading this again after the throne speech — twice now — there is
something that strikes me after nine years in this House. It is the most
credible throne speech, the most positive direction set for this province, that
I can find in any time in the history of the province. It is something that we
as a government are proud of. We're proud of it because we had to make the tough
decisions starting in 2001 and as we move forward to build a great province for
our children and our grandchildren.
I want to talk about a number of things today — about the golden
decade, with regard to our future in the province — but I do want to spend a few
minutes at the beginning of my speech talking about pages 21, 22 and half of
page 23 of this throne speech. That is the area of the speech where we talk
about safer streets and schools in the province.
When I became the Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General
back in 2001, the Premier said to me that he wanted somebody getting up every
day and thinking about the future of policing, the issues in and around
community safety and crime prevention in our province. I met with the members of
the law enforcement community in this province, and we started to build a plan.
The first thing I found out was how detailed the plan of the NDP was.
The NDP's commitment to policing, community safety and law
enforcement was this plan: a blank piece of paper with no relationship
whatsoever to law enforcement in the province. They had no commitment whatsoever
to communities. They had no commitment whatsoever to law enforcement and did not
even have a dialogue with the law enforcement community as to how we could
reduce crime in B.C. and build a better and safer future for the children of
this province.
As we moved through that period of time, we found out a number of
things. First of all, as a result of the previous government having no dialogue
or relationship with law enforcement, I found a structure of policing that was
thirsting for an opportunity to take it into the future and that had never had
the opportunity to discuss it with a minister or with a government to build on
that future.
As we moved forward, starting in the summer of 2001, a number of
things became pretty apparent. The first thing was that the law enforcement
community and policing in general in this province, because they had had no
relationship with a government in ten years, were suspicious that they could
actually build one with this government.
It took a number of months just discussing with them and looking
at the fiscal side of policing as to how we could build a future and fill the
positions that were left vacant because of underfunding by the previous
government with regard to policing. As we did that, we worked with the
leadership of policing in this province — the B.C. Association of Chiefs of
Police, the RCMP and those groups of people — to get to where we are today and
to the comments that are made in this throne speech.
[1115]
The first thing we did, though, was this. The community had said
to us: "We actually think there's a better way to deal with the information
management, to
[ Page 11879 ]
deal with the patterning of crime in our province and to deal with the future
of policing in our province than we're doing it today." We also believe we have
that system, because we've tested it in three jurisdictions in B.C., but we
can't get past first base to have a discussion about it. This system is called
PRIME — police records information management environment.
You know, Mr. Speaker, as you look at this throne speech and at
what has been done in three and a half years in this province and you see the
basis of the strong economy and the basis of the money we put into health care,
education, the safety net that we built for our people, the sustainable
environment management and at how we built a great economy by working with our
partners, you also have to look back at some of the tough decisions and support
that were given by the leadership of this province, particularly the Premier of
this province, to different things that happened in ministries to get us there.
In the fall of 2001, as everybody in this room will recall, we
were facing a huge structural deficit in dealing with the whole aspect of how we
were going to balance our budget and build an economic future for B.C. In that
environment, we were looking at a possibility of a records information
management environment for policing — one that might change the entire dynamics
of policing for the future of the province and for our citizens, one that a
couple of chiefs of police have said is actually the biggest step in law
enforcement in the last 30 years.
Well, in the fall of 2001 we were in a different vein, having to
balance this budget and deal with that structural deficit. I went to the Premier
of this province, and I said this: "We have an opportunity to move into
real-time information management for policing in every jurisdiction in the
province, but in order to accomplish that, we have to do a couple of things.
First of all, we have to select a technology for every police officer in B.C. We
can't have one community that thinks they can have one kind of computer system
and another community that thinks they want to have a different kind of computer
system. The second thing is that in order to get it into the car and on the
street, we can't have communities saying: 'We aren't doing it, because we're not
spending the money.'"
The Premier at that time supported this ministry to go to Treasury
Board to get the money to pay for PRIME in 2001. It was a groundbreaking move on
the part of the leadership of this province and the Premier to support that
initiative, because this is what PRIME does for us. It gives us real-time
information management, and every police car in British Columbia probably will
be furnished with it within the next 12 months. We have it operating in over 20
communities today already.
The important part of this is…. Think about a couple of cases.
When we were testing PRIME in one community, we had a break-in at a high school.
A bunch of musical instruments had been stolen. The musical instruments and the
case were put into PRIME in real time. The following day a police officer
driving down the road in another community policed by a different type of police
agency picked up that in a pawnshop in that community, some musical instruments
had been pawned overnight. They were loaded into a portal into PRIME.
The police officer went by, found the musical instruments,
confirmed that they were indeed from the B and E in another community, got a
search warrant and made arrests that afternoon. In the past, that case would
probably have taken weeks, if not months — or never — to reach the desk or,
indeed, the car of a police officer in a neighbouring community.
A few years ago in this province we had a police officer who
probably had one of the toughest things that he has to live with today as a
result of doing a job. A police officer stopped a person on the side of the road
in a community in the interior of British Columbia. They checked the person for
wants and warrants and let the individual go, because there were none. Two hours
later that individual killed their estranged spouse.
The police officer on the side of the road couldn't know that
there was an order in the courts that the individual could not be in that
community. Through a system called JUSTIN in our justice system, we will be
loading those things into PRIME so that in the future a police officer will have
that information at their fingertips to protect communities better.
If there's a pattern of crime in one community or there are people
missing from one community in numbers and they're showing up at a party site in
another community, that system will talk to itself. It will actually tell
people, so you can set up a pattern of crime, solve a crime more quickly and
deal with issues.
[1120]
As we moved through PRIME, we needed to move to actually build a
strong future for policing in British Columbia, and it required a number of
things to happen. It required the leadership of this province in policing to
first of all recognize that integration in law enforcement was the only way we
could build such a future. It also required us to look at how we did business
and how we could apply dollars and build that financial future for policing. As
we came through that and continued to add funds into specific investigations
that had to be dealt with by police and resources were reapplied, we asked law
enforcement to do one thing more. We asked the RCMP to build a plan for policing
for the next three to five years and tell us how much it would cost to fund it
properly.
In this throne speech two things happened. It basically confirms
250 additional police officers over the next three years are going to be added
to policing in British Columbia at a cost of $122 million to the province, not
inclusive of the 30 percent that the RCMP will also receive in the provincial
budget for policing from the federal government. In addition to that, it also
confirms that 100 percent of traffic fines will go back to communities. We have
done that already, and we're going to continue to do that in the future.
The purpose of the $41 million in traffic fines is for the people
in those communities to see that money go
[ Page 11880 ]
into crime prevention, community policing or additional police officers on
their streets. It is not to be used for something else, as some communities
seemed to think they want to do. Because we didn't put strings attached to it,
we thought they would take responsibility to their citizens and invest it in
crime prevention and law enforcement. Those communities that have maybe chosen
not to do that should be aware of the fact that in the future the criticism in
their community — when they're short of policing or crime prevention — will come
back to them for taking that money and not putting it where it belonged. For the
most part, communities are taking that $41 million and investing it in law
enforcement in communities that pay for policing in British Columbia — that is,
a group of communities that are over 5,000 or have their own city police forces.
Outside of that, we recognize this: because of the lack of having
a plan by the NDP like this, we found that in rural policing in B.C., we wanted
to do some improvements. When we sat down with our police force, we said: "Look,
what about our smaller communities? What about the Queen Charlottes? What about
the areas like Zeballos and Granisle? What about the smaller communities that
have significant issues with first nations policing, where they need to have
additional officers? Give us those numbers."
We are actually putting police officers in all of these small
communities around the province — additional police officers that will reduce
crime by visibility but will also do it as a result of the fact that they're
going to be targeted by the regional policing model that we have designed to get
the best coverage possible for the citizens of British Columbia. It is the first
time in almost 20 years that there has been a significant investment in
additional policing in the province at that level. What happened in the past was
that with no relationship with government, government ignored the requests of
police and continued to think, "Well, you go manage it within the envelope you
have," which resulted in vacancies not being filled.
As we move forward through this plan to get to where we are today,
we did some innovative things in this province in addition to PRIME. In May of
2003 we put together 54 officers from 22 communities between Pemberton and
Boston Bar into an integrated homicide unit. We believe that when it comes to
investigating serious crime, you need to be able to go across borders and not be
isolated in your thinking in law enforcement that a crime doesn't move from one
community to the other or that intelligence cannot be shared.
We put together this integrated homicide unit. The reason we did
it…. It was part of the plan to build up to where we are today with the
additional 215 police officers we're going to put across the province, as talked
about in this throne speech. When we became an integrated homicide unit in 2003,
50 percent of the homicides in British Columbia resulted in the Crown laying
charges. Today 80 percent of the homicides in British Columbia — that is an
increase of 30 percent — result in the Crown laying charges. Because we have
integrated the intelligence, we've put these people together on one team, and
the results are phenomenal. It is actually one of the best rates in North
America today.
[1125]
As we worked through that last summer, the Attorney General and I
sat down with the Indo-Canadian community. There was a significant concern about
the number of homicides — drug-related murders — that were taking place in that
community among young men. Over 70 murders have occurred there in the last ten
years. We have moved forward to have an integrated homicide unit now work with
an integrated gang task force which will concentrate on those files so that we
can share the intelligence and build the ability to have the success to push
back on this in their community. They will work with us on the information side
and also in the building of a new responsibility and new belief for their youth
in their communities that they can get out of the cycle of crime that some of
their peers have had in the past.
We knew we had a difficulty with auto theft, so what we did was
again took our police community and put an integrated auto theft task force
together, including bait cars. Today we see a precipitous drop in auto thefts on
the lower mainland as a result of implementing the bait car program and the auto
theft task force. As we have done that and as we have funded that, we have also
seen significant results that tell us we will now move that program into other
major communities across the province like Nanaimo and Kelowna, the rest of the
Okanagan and into the north.
As we worked on this plan to get where we are with the 215
officers, which is in addition to everything I have spoken to so far, we also
recognized something else was taking place. We had two other agencies in B.C.
that were involved in law enforcement where we weren't getting the best value
for dollar as far as being able to task the people the way we wanted to. The
first was a relationship between ICBC and the law enforcement community with
regards to them sending money to communities to put officers out there at time
and a half and double time to do things like CounterAttack and some corridor
patrol for traffic safety — some additional traffic patrol.
We sat down with the community, as we knew what we should be
doing. We should actually create an integrated provincial traffic unit. If we do
that, two things happen. First of all, if we take the funding and put it into
that unit, we pay 70-cent dollars instead of time and a half. It also allows us
to target people not just into traffic but also in visibility of policing. In
addition to that, we would also have more success in our CounterAttack programs.
We're rolling out the integrated traffic unit now, in addition to
the 215 officers. There will be between 80 and 100 officers around the province,
in every community, that will see the benefit of those folks out there to deal
not only with the eyes that watch for crime but the crime prevention that comes
from the visibility of po-
[ Page 11881 ]
licing, which is a much better investment in law enforcement than the other.
The other thing we did is we took a look at our Organized Crime
Agency. Many years ago they set up an organized crime agency, which was supposed
to be an integrated unit with all law enforcement in British Columbia. It was
having some success, but the leadership of policing said: "Why don't we make it
an organized crime unit, have an integrated unit under the management of the
RCMP — where the leadership of whoever is running the unit could come from any
police force in the province — and turn it into a provincial unit?" Again, what
that means is we pay 70-cent dollars for the provincial unit, whether the
officer is seconded from a city police force or detachment or is a member of the
provincial force. We found another $4 million in that initiative alone to
reinvest in investigations relative to organized crime. That is also working on
behalf of people in B.C.
As we came through all of this and started to move towards where
we were getting to the final plan for policing for the next three to four years,
which is talked about in this throne speech, we identified some other things
that were significantly important for our communities. We tested something
called an ISPOT team. An ISPOT team is an integrated sexual predator operations
team. What it does is follow significant sexual predators who are released from
the courts, who we know are likely to breach their conditions of release within
72 hours. They're going to go to a swimming pool, to a playground or to another
area where there are children and where they're not supposed to be, or there are
other significant issues with regards to their release.
[1130]
We know that by watching and waiting, we can save children from
being abused. In a recent four-week project we made 17 arrests and laid 54
criminal charges in only four weeks. So we know an ISPOT team works.
Part of the funding that we see in this throne speech is going to
permanently put in place an ISPOT team for British Columbia — a team that will
track these people, stop them and catch them before they ruin the life of
another child. It's an important initiative, and I'm proud of the fact that we
were able to put it together in the policing plan and put it in this throne
speech to tell British Columbians where we're going.
There is another huge aspect of crime that is actually starting to
affect our children, and that is cybercrime. Whether it be Internet luring or
child pornography, it is terrible, it is divisive, it is hurtful, and it is
disgusting in our society. We've worked on a plan to deal with cybercrime — in
addition to the officers we already have and by adding 14 additional officers in
this funding that's in this throne speech — to fight Internet luring and child
pornography.
This was the NDP plan for protecting your children from that — a
blank piece of paper. No direction, no relationship, no thought to communities,
because they wouldn't even talk to law enforcement about this type of thing.
Yet, you know, one of the most cherished groups of people in our society is our
children and our grandchildren. For a government to ignore the relationship with
policing and not build a plan to deal with this, as we go forward, was actually
totally and completely irresponsible. We have taken that responsibility
seriously as a government and built a plan for policing that is building the
future to protect our children.
Through the initiative of some of the members in this House, we
have put in place an AMBER alert plan for British Columbia in the last year —
one that will allow us, in the case of the abduction of a child where there is
fear for the child's life…. We'll be able to alert all our media, all our
outlets in British Columbia, to try and solve and take care of that issue very
quickly.
Many of you remember that there was actually a child abducted from
my riding not too many months ago, who was returned to us a number of hours
later — found in Surrey. What people probably don't realize is that we took the
resources of the 54 members of the integrated homicide unit and immediately
applied them to assist in that major investigation to track that child, when
that happened. We were on the verge of an AMBER alert when the child was found.
If you don't have the resources that you can move across borders to help a
community in a situation like that, you would be irresponsible in policing by
not integrating. By having the ability to direct those resources to help people
with regards to a crime like that, I believe we were able to save a child.
That's just a description of where we sit as a result of three and
a half years in policing, with a relationship with a group of people. Now we
have $30 million a year being applied to additional policing in British Columbia
over the next three years — 215 additional officers, as the throne speech says.
The significance of that is this: we will have major crime units in regional
centres around the province to deal with the relationship that major crime has
and major investigation has to the entire infrastructure of policing in B.C.
They will integrate back to the organized crime unit, the serious crime unit and
the integrated homicide unit in B.C. You will have this intricate relationship
between law enforcement, within themselves, because we are the ones that took
the leadership to put those folks on the ground in a regional manner for serious
crime.
You're going to see a community like Zeballos — which went through
a terrible time with a homicide of a young person and which was receiving
policing from a community 45 minutes to an hour away — have a police officer in
that community. When we started to put the officer in the community, the mayor
said: "You have saved my community." The level of crime went down because the
gangs that were operating in the community when the police weren't there now
know there's a presence in the community to reduce the level of crime. Watch
that impact as it starts to get to smaller communities. We build this plan that
we've worked on for four years to get to where we could actually measure our
results and know exactly where we should
[ Page 11882 ]
target people to deal with policing and building a future for our communities
in B.C. and the safety of them.
[1135]
When we were advised that we were going to be doing the
announcement of the $30 million that had been approved by Treasury Board to go
forward with this policing plan that had been worked on, I spoke to some people
in policing and the management of policing in this province who were, frankly,
as I described it, over the moon. They believed that the previous government —
they wouldn't say this, but I can tell you that given the plan was this, they
didn't have to — had ignored them in B.C for too long.
For too long the funding needs and the future and the structure
had to be put in place to make it work, and all of these initiatives that we
took and additional moneys we put in leading up to the 215 officers had already
given them a sense of optimism that they had the opportunity to take care of
their communities. But when we said, "You've got it all. Your plan is fully
funded for the next three years. The funds are there, and the contingencies for
any raises and salaries, so you don't ever have to go back and take it out of
the base funding and cut police officers in this province," they looked forward
and said: "Finally, since 1981" — 1981 — "we have a government that understands
the funding of public safety for the future of our citizens in British Columbia
and who we are proud to work with on a plan to do that."
From having no plan at all, we have incrementally built a future
for policing over the last three years. Coming into the last 18 months as we
built the plan that leads to the 215 officers and the $30 million a year…. We
finished the plan. We now know after doing all of this work with the leadership
of law enforcement, who get all the credit with regard to being able to build
that plan, that we are fully funding the future of policing in British Columbia
in a relationship that is integrated, regionalized and will work for our
citizens.
As we do that, let's not forget — because I never will — that as
we work through that plan, and as I did it as a minister, there was always one
individual who stood there and said: "We're going to do what is right for the
communities in this province, and we will support you in building that plan both
physically and economically." That was the Premier of this province, who has
stood behind policing and stood behind this ministry's objectives from day one
to build a great future for British Columbia.
That leads me to this. This throne speech, as I said, may be the
quintessential throne speech in the history of this province because of what it
delivers back to B.C., what it builds for a future in every aspect of our
province. It does it because of the fact that somebody stepped into the fray as
the leader of this province and put a team together in 2001 of the members of
our caucus and our government to go forward and build a plan and know that there
was an end goal for the people of B.C. That was our Premier.
The Premier saw the importance of the power of a strong economy.
The Premier saw the importance of setting a set of goals and a direction for the
future of our province. We had the New Era document as we came into 2001,
Mr. Speaker, and I can tell you that well over 90 percent of everything in that
document has been completed or acted upon as a government. You will not find
another government in any jurisdiction that I can find that has a record like
that in keeping its commitments.
The fact of the matter is that as you move through that, sometimes
you run into bumps in the road, and you adjust, but the reality is that the new
era did exactly what it was set out to do. That was to lay a foundation of
commitments for citizens to measure this government by, which I am proud to let
them measure me against, but it also set a new era for hope and prosperity in
British Columbia. When you see almost 200,000 additional jobs and when you see
how the province has performed, you see the economic stability of a government
and its finances so that they can fund things like policing and other aspects.
The prosperity is also here because of the leadership of our Premier and the
work that our government has done over the last three and a half years.
[1140]
As I look at that, I also marvel at what's been accomplished. Not
only from the aspect of taking a group of people like the law enforcement
community and empowering them to build a plan with government for the future to
protect our citizens…. Look at the rest of it. In the area of health care alone
— moving down from 50-plus authorities and aspects of management in health care
to six, and taking a government and being able in tough times to still invest an
additional $2.4 billion in health care over a three-and-a-half-year period….
When you think about that, that's an $8-point-some billion budget
when we became government and $2.4 billion today. Yet our detractors out there —
people that actually, I guess, could never add when they were government
themselves, could never really do anything more than do a fudge-it budget — say:
"Oh, they cut health care." It's an additional $2.4 billion into health care,
it's a better management system for the citizens of our province, and it's
building a foundation for health care so that it will be there for us when we,
our grandchildren and our children get old.
We said in New Era that we would not cut education funding.
In actual fact, we have increased the education funding every single year we've
been in government. We've done that while we've seen 28,000 fewer students in
our public school system. If you are out there today, think about this. The
government left the funding in place while 28,000 fewer students were there to
be taught and increased the spending incrementally every year as an investment
in the education system. They did it why? Because the New Era talked
about hope and prosperity and how we would, as we built the economy into a
strong economy for the future of the province, reinvest in health care and
education. That's exactly what we have done through this throne speech and the
budget we'll see this afternoon.
[ Page 11883 ]
We are in the golden decade, but I think it's the golden future.
It's only a golden future when we re-elect this government and re-elect this
Premier to build the great future that we all deserve.
M. Hunter: That's a tough act to follow.
I am pleased and proud to stand here on behalf of the electorate
of Nanaimo to respond to the throne speech that was presented just a week ago.
It was a throne speech that was, in my view, an inspirational precursor to this
afternoon's budget. To me, not only was it inspirational, but it was visionary,
it was exciting, and it was deserving of a province whose potential was wasted
for an entire decade — potential which is now…. We're now seeing the light at
the end of a very long tunnel.
It is worth recalling. In fact, I think it's our responsibility in
this chamber to remind each other and the public of British Columbia of the
dismal facts about the 1990s in this province. It was a decade during which the
western world experienced some of the fastest and most sustained economic growth
ever in the history of humankind. But it was a decade in which B.C. missed out.
In fact, British Columbia went backwards. It went from first to last amongst the
Canadian provinces. The old advice to people where I came from in Europe was:
"Go west, young man." In British Columbia that advice became: "Go head for the
hills." Just a reminder, Mr. Speaker, that the hills are to the east, and people
did that by the thousands.
As personal incomes declined and jobs disappeared in this
province, people and families, old and young, by the thousands fled the economic
devastation in British Columbia to find their way to Alberta and Ontario and
other parts of North America. It's a history that cannot and will not be denied,
and it must be remembered, because the NDP and their union bosses want B.C. to
go backwards. But given what's in this throne speech, the visionary message from
this government, I'm confident that the people of British Columbia are not ready
to step backwards or to have their affairs run by B.C.'s union politburo.
What this government is presenting to the people of British
Columbia is a vision of progress and hope. It's a vision of seeking out and
taking opportunities to advance the situation of every resident of this place,
to set up a framework within which the spirit of British Columbia — its people,
its entrepreneurs — can flourish.
[1145]
Let me talk about the elements of the vision, the goals we've set
for British Columbia and the golden decade and more that lies within our grasp.
The first and perhaps most important goal in the long term is to make this place
the best-educated and most literate on the continent.
We all know that a good education pays huge dividends both to
individuals and to society as a whole. We all know that literacy skills are the
passport to meaningful work and lifelong happiness. They're not the only
determinants, but they are very, very important. We also know that we live in a
time where success means being the best. Competition for investment around North
America is fierce. A good education system and a truly literate population — and
I include in that a numerate population — mean that employers can find qualified
employees. Secure jobs mean stability for families.
Let me take time to give credit to B.C.'s educators for the work
they're doing, because education is a subject about which everybody has an
opinion. They are strongly held opinions, and that's fine. I appreciate that,
and I encourage that kind of debate. But we do need to step back from the fray
once in a while to thank the teachers in our schools and to thank parents who,
under this government's guidance, are again welcome and involved in their
children's school affairs. We need to thank school trustees whose task, frankly,
is very often a thankless one because they bear the load of making critical
decisions about our local education systems and our kids. But it is clear from
the improving academic results across this province that this government's
significant investments and the efforts of educators around the province in
education at all levels are starting to pay off.
I also want to note — because in my community, aboriginal people
are a significant part of our population — that it is really gratifying to see
that our attention on aboriginal education achievement is also starting to pay
off in significant increases in aboriginal graduation rates. We are far from a
situation of equality between aboriginal and the general population rates, but
we are starting to make some progress, and I think we need to celebrate that.
It's really great to see the involvement of parents and families
in the affairs of our schools. In Nanaimo, Mr. Speaker, I can tell you that in
our community schools, we have a great example of how we can use our educational
facilities to provide advantages and opportunities throughout the year to
students and others in the community. That is a great example that we can follow
as we pursue the throne speech goal of using those educational facilities more
than we do today.
Can we do better in education? You bet. Are our students being
challenged enough? Personally, I don't think so. When I was educated in another
country many, many years ago now, I think I was much more seriously challenged
than my own kids were. My grandkids are just starting school, so I don't know.
But we must challenge our students. We can't have students in grade 12 spending
their days doing things other than studying and preparing for the future.
Our vision for education is one of constant improvement so we can
be the best we can be. The renewed economic vigour of British Columbia is
allowing us to refocus on things like music and the arts in our schools, as well
as providing new resources within the recently announced $150 million boost to
funding. That's a $150 million boost to funding — new resources within that
amount of money for special needs students, young folks who really need special
attention and increased special attention. In my opinion, that's welcome and
important news. It's part of a program
[ Page 11884 ]
where we have boosted per-student funding by over $860 since 2001, despite a
drop in student enrolment of 29,000 students in that same period — not something
that the B.C. Teachers Federation happens to mention in its public advertising
campaign.
We live in an age when education never ends. It used to be that
once you had finished high school or university, you were on your way to a
lifetime of employment. But that's not so today. It hasn't been for many, many
years, and that's why the important focus on post-secondary education.
Look at the growth of Malaspina University College, which has its
home base in my city. Not only has it grown its degree programs and technical
programs, but also there is growth in adult education. We have people of all
ages going back to school to learn new skills and gain new knowledge that they
need either to improve their lives or to get better jobs. The 1,100 new seats
that are coming to Malaspina University College by 2010 will ensure the
continued growth of this important educational icon in my city, both the
physical growth and the intellectual growth that Malaspina represents.
[1150]
I'm grateful, and I know my community is, for this government's
investment in the Centre for Shellfish Research at Malaspina University College,
its significant investment in the new library which will be opening in the
coming weeks and in other physical facilities that are making Malaspina
University a place of some repute. I am confident that Malaspina University
College can, and will, take up the challenge of exploring its potential role as
a new special-purpose university in British Columbia in the months ahead.
This government's vision doesn't end with education. We want the
residents of British Columbia to lead North America in physical fitness and in
healthy living. Why? Because we know that healthy living and physical fitness
mean a better health care system. Everyone knows that preventative medicine
makes sense, but not all of us can translate that knowledge into our everyday
habits. Frankly, I could use some help myself, because I've struggled with my
weight ever since a knee operation in my twenties left me unable to play the
beautiful game — football. And for the Solicitor General, that's played with a
round ball, not any other shape.
This approach to preventative medicine is not about "eat your
broccoli." The trivial comments made by some media people around the approach to
preventative medicine are just that — trivial. This is about putting emphasis on
health care, not illness care. I think this is something we all know makes
sense, and I certainly support it. It's important because health care, as we
have come to know it…. Health care programs are consuming ever-increasing
amounts of our tax dollars as our population grows and ages.
We are benefiting in my community from improvements to our health
care system. We have, as a result of this government's investments, a new MRI
scanning machine in Nanaimo. We have new kidney dialysis machines available in
Nanaimo. We are weeks away from opening new surgical suites in the Nanaimo
Regional General Hospital, which will conclude an 18-year period of promises.
These things were going to be built. Now they are being built, and they're
almost open. We will have more surgical procedures.
I think it's important to note, as well, that while we improve our
health care system in that kind of way, we are also investing heavily — making
important investments to boost British Columbia's impressive global record in
health care.
Genome mapping — something I know very little about, but I know it
is advanced research in medicine that British Columbia excels in. We know that
cancer research in this province is providing the best cancer outcomes for
people across Canada. That's significant. We know that the SARS vaccine came
from a lab in British Columbia. These are global advances that we are investing
in as this government. I'm proud of that.
We also have a vision for the best supports anywhere in North
America for people with disabilities and with special needs, for children at
risk and for seniors. The opposition wants you to believe that we don't care
about these groups within our society. The opposition focuses on the
sensational, and often, in my view, they have misled British Columbians about
the facts. The fearmongering of the opposition on these subjects does not change
those facts. This government is addressing issues that arise from the
demographics that we face. There will be 22 percent more senior citizens in this
province by 2010. That is five short years away, and I'm almost going to be
amongst them — almost.
Knowledge about these changes isn't new. The Solicitor General
talked about the blank page in law enforcement. The last government had a blank
page when it came to dealing with demographics that were already on the radar
screen. This is not new; we've known about it since 1946 when the baby boom
started. It's disgraceful that no other government before this one had the
courage and the guts to start to tackle some of these issues. We're taking the
issue head-on, and the new Premier's council on aging is going to be an
important institution as we find our way through this maze.
Mr. Speaker, I have lots more to say. But noting the time, I move
adjournment of debate.
M. Hunter moved adjournment of debate.
Motion approved.
Hon. I. Chong moved adjournment of the House.
Motion approved.
Deputy Speaker: The House stands adjourned until 2 p.m.
today.
The House adjourned at 11:55 a.m.
[ Return to: Legislative Assembly Home Page ]
Hansard Services publishes transcripts both in print and on
the Internet. Chamber debates are broadcast on television and webcast on the
Internet.
channel guide • Broadcast
schedule
Copyright ©
2005: British Columbia Hansard Services, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada