Newfoundland and Labrador Hansard — Members' Statements; Statements by Ministers — 29 April 2013 (47th General Assembly, 2nd Session, Vol. XLVII No. 11)

2013-04-29

Newfoundland and Labrador — Debates (Hansard)

Newfoundland and Labrador Hansard — Members' Statements; Statements by Ministers — 29 April 2013 (47th General Assembly, 2nd Session, Vol. XLVII No. 11)

2013-04-29

Newfoundland and Labrador — Debates (Hansard)

PDF Version

April

29, 2013 HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY PROCEEDINGS

Vol. XLVII No. 11

The House met at 1:30 p.m.

MR. SPEAKER (Wiseman): Order, please!

Admit strangers.

Statements by Members

MR. SPEAKER: Today we will have members' statements from the Member for

the District of Port au Port; the Member for the District of Bonavista North;

the Member for the District of St. John's West; the Member for the District of

Kilbride; the Member for the District of Torngat Mountains; and the Member for

the District of Exploits.

The Member for the District of Port au Port.

MR. CORNECT: Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate Pat Marche on the

publication of his book Musicians of Bay St. George and the Port au Port

Peninsula which highlights the talents of local musicians from the 1940s to

the present.

Mr. Marche was motivated to compile this book from his love of music and his

desire to preserve our rich musical culture here in the Bay St. George-Port au

Port Peninsula region.

Mr. Marche's book was launched this past November. The book tells the stories

of over 500 featured musicians and it is complemented with more than 435

photographs. It is important to preserve our rich musical culture and heritage,

as it is a part of who we are as Newfoundlanders and Labradorians.

Mr. Speaker, I ask all hon. members to join with me in applauding Mr. Pat

Marche in his efforts that has led to the publication of this fine book that

highlights the musical talents of people from the Bay St. George-Port au Port

region.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The Member for Bonavista North.

MR. CROSS: Mr. Speaker, last week was office professionals week, so it

gives me great pleasure to stand in this Chamber today to recognize someone who

plays a very vital role in my day-to-day operations.

It is the professional expertise of administrative assistants, secretaries,

and receptionists who keep the engines of business running everywhere from

small business to schools, modest offices to the upper reaches of multinational

corporations.

The role of executive assistants has been recognized since the early 1950s,

when industry boomed after World War II, calling upon primarily women to take on

the role of assistants to the new captains of industry. Since then, a gender

balance has taken place and the role is becoming increasingly important in the

day-to-day operations of companies worldwide.

Valerie Hewitt is the engine that drives my constituency office. She is the

first friendly voice that greets constituents, that reassuring tone, that

calming influence. There is unanimity to the responses I receive from my

constituents that they appreciate her caring, professional, and confidential

dedication to their concerns.

The words organized, pleasant, dedicated, compassionate, and efficient are

all rolled into one name Valerie. I am sure all hon. members have their own

Valeries or Ediths, Roberts or Justins, so I know you will make this unanimous

as we tip our hats to our CAs and EAs for their contribution to our lives as

MHAs.

Thank you.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The Member for St. John's West.

MR. CRUMMELL: I rise today to congratulate the students and staff of

Cowan Heights Elementary School on their Heritage Fair that took place on March

I had the pleasure of attending the Heritage Fair, Mr. Speaker, and I have to

say that there were some wonderful projects on display. Nearly fifty Cowan

Heights students presented on this year's theme My Province, Newfoundland and

Labrador. As you can imagine, the projects covered a wide and interesting range

of topics, and I can certainly understand why the eight community judges had

difficulty in selecting finalists to represent Cowan Heights Elementary at the

upcoming Regional Fair.

Mr. Speaker, the top three projects selected were Voisey's Bay Mine by Sarra

Kenny and Emily Woodfine; Newfoundland Fisheries by Ethan Knight; and

Newfoundland Wolf by Brianna Squires. The alternate project was Gros Morne

National Park by Anna Taylor and Lillith Kelly.

Mr. Speaker, I commend these students, and indeed all students and staff at

Cowan Heights Elementary, for the hard work that went into this year's Heritage

Fair and I wish the finalists every success at the Regional Fair being held this

weekend at St. Matthew's Elementary.

Thank you.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The Member for the District of Kilbride.

MR. DINN: Mr. Speaker, I stand in this hon. House today to recognize the

great effort of Hazelwood Elementary School, St. John's, in its Shave for the

Brave Campaign.

On Monday, March 25, 2013, Hazelwood had its third Shave for the Brave in

support of Young Adult Cancer Canada. A total of 113 students, staff, and

parents participated in the shave.

In 2012, Hazelwood had the distinction of being named the Bravest School in

Newfoundland and Labrador and Canada. The goal this year was to retain this

title. The 133 heads shaved this year represents the highest number at any

school ever and with this number, Hazelwood is certainly in the running to

retain its title. To date, the school has raised in excess of $11,000 in its

2013 Shave for the Brave Campaign.

I ask all hon. members to join me in congratulating the students, staff, and

parents of Hazelwood Elementary for a great job done in raising money and

awareness for cancer research. I want to especially commend Principal Kirk Smith

for his tremendous motivational efforts at Hazelwood.

Thank you.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for Torngat Mountains.

MR. EDMUNDS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I rise in this hon. House today to recognize Captain Mike Byrne for his

forty-five years of service to the aviation industry in Labrador.

Mike began his career as a mechanic with Eastern Provincial Airways in 1958,

and started flying in 1969. Since then, he has logged well over 40,000 hours of

flying, many in a single-engine airplane throughout Labrador.

Mike also served as a pilot and chief pilot with Labrador Airways, now known

as Air Labrador. Respected as an experienced and knowledgeable bush pilot,

Captain Byrne transported everything from fuel drums to snowmobiles and caribou.

He flew many medevac flights, transporting physicians and nurses to seriously

ill patients in coastal remote communities, many years without modern

navigational aids.

As a pioneer of the aviation industry to the Coast of Labrador and a close

family friend, Mike has related many stories of heroism throughout his flying

career, but none that he knowingly put himself or any of his passengers in

potentially dangerous situations. He did what he loved most, helping people and

flying airplanes.

Mr. Speaker, I ask all hon. members to join me in congratulating and thanking

Captain Mike Byrne for his forty-five years of service to Labrador aviation.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for the District of Exploits.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. FORSEY: Mr. Speaker, in November of 2012, Bishop's Falls native Craig

Harnum, Manager of the Marine Institute's Safety and Emergency Response Training

Centre in Stephenville, was recognized for twenty-five years of volunteer fire

service.

Craig practically grew up in the fire hall in Bishop's Falls. Craig's dad,

Harry, volunteered for forty-two years and is the former fire chief.

Mr. Speaker, with his dad's forty-two years, his brother Hedley with forty,

his brother Garry with thirty-nine, his nephew Stephen with eleven, and Craig's

wife Sandee with ten, the family has 168 years of fire and emergency service.

Craig said he was fortunate not to receive an injury in all these years and

credits this to the knowledge he received from his father, and the training he

underwent over the years. He said training is really the key.

Mr. Speaker, I ask all members of this House to join me in congratulating

Craig Harnum and the Harnum family for their many years of dedicated

volunteering service.

Thank you.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: Statements by Ministers.

Statements by Ministers

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS SULLIVAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, I rise in this hon. House today to inform people throughout the

Province about a new nurse practitioner master's program offered through

Memorial University School of Nursing, in collaboration with the Centre for

Nursing Studies.

The Master of Nursing, Nurse Practitioner Option, which began in January

2013, will see the enrolment of twelve to sixteen women and men annually, as a

result of a provincial government investment of approximately $3.6 million in

core funding over the next five years.

The program consists of twelve courses, and students may complete the program

full-time in two years over six semesters, or part-time over ten semesters. The

first class of students will graduate from this program in October 2014.

Mr. Speaker, nurse practitioners provide primary health care services and are

particularly important in rural and remote areas where access to physician care

is sometimes limited. The new master's program will prepare nurses to work in

expanded roles in acute care areas such as emergency rooms, mental health and

cardiac care, as well as long-term care and out-patient clinics.

This program is unique in that it is offered through distance education,

which allows nurses to advance their education while continuing to work in their

field. As a former teacher who taught courses through distance education for

many years, I know first-hand the value and benefit of offering education

through this innovative method.

Mr. Speaker, Newfoundland and Labrador was one of the first Canadian

provinces to introduce the nurse practitioner primary health care role.

Currently, there are 123 nurse practitioners registered to practice in the

Province. In 2011, we had twenty-one nurse practitioners per 100,000 people, the

second-highest number in Canada. We have since increased this number to

twenty-four.

Our government recognizes the vital role nursing professionals play in our

health care system. This master's program will not only deliver a higher level

of education and training to nurse practitioners in the Province, but will

advance patient-centred care and health care services overall now and in the

future.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for Burgeo La Poile.

MR. A. PARSONS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I thank the minister for an advance copy of her statement. Congratulations to

Memorial University and the Centre for Nursing Studies on the establishment of

the Nurse Practitioner Option within the Master of Nursing program.

The presence of nurse practitioners in our health care system is growing and

their role in remote and rural communities is crucial, particularly given the

challenges in physician recruitment and retention. Certainly, I know that in my

district and in places like Ramea where they have had a lot of trouble filling

the nurse practitioner position. We know the value of nurse practitioners given

that Port aux Basques was amongst the first to get that. I take that was a

Liberal government initiative as well.

Scopes of practice are being expanded for various health care professionals,

such as nurse practitioners and licensed practical nurses. Our regional health

authorities are adjusting skill-mix ratios to save the Province money. As a

result of these changes, we are seeing nurses displaced from Central Health due

to this practice and residents are concerned about the impact of these changes

on their health and safety.

Ironically, we received numerous calls about the elimination of the nurse

practitioner position in Central. While it was replaced with a clinical nurse

educator, the person who filled that role was dedicated to the community. It is

important to remember these just are not positions, they are people. We wish the

inaugural class of the master's program all the best.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for St. John's Centre.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS ROGERS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I too thank the minister for an advance copy of her statement. Bravo to the

MUN School of Nursing and the Centre for Nursing Studies. It is great to have

this training program to increase the number of nurse practitioners in our

Province. Their role is crucial to a fully comprehensive health care primary

care model. As well, they can reduce wait times in emergency departments and can

provide high levels of care to those who do not have access to a family doctor.

I hope government will follow this initiative up with a commitment to ensure

that more nurse practitioners are hired by regional health authorities in every

region to work with doctors, RNs, and the communities to improve our primary

health care system. Bravo, Mr. Speaker. I am sure my colleagues would like to

join me in saying bravo to those nurses who have dedicated their lives to taking

care of the people of Newfoundland and Labrador.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Environment and Conservation.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. HEDDERSON: Mr. Speaker, I rise to remind my hon. colleagues that the

deadline for nominations for the 2013 Environmental Awards, May 1, is fast

approaching. This awards program is an annual celebration of environmental

achievements in our Province, and raises awareness of the individuals, groups

and businesses that are taking action to protect and sustain our environment.

This initiative, Mr. Speaker, is jointly sponsored by the Department of

Environment and Conservation, the Multi-Materials Stewardship Board, and the

Newfoundland and Labrador Women's Institutes. There are six categories to

recognize outstanding environmental and conservation achievements. These are:

Individual; Community Group or Organization; Youth, Youth Group or School;

Municipality or Regional Waste Management Committee; and, Business or Industry

Leader.

In addition to being celebrated at an awards ceremony during Environment

Week, Mr. Speaker, each of the winners will also receive a $1,000 honorarium

from the MMSB to go towards furthering their own environmental projects or to

donate to an environmental cause of their choice.

Mr. Speaker, for more than twenty years, these annual awards have highlighted

the work of countless men and women who are true environmental ambassadors for

this Province of Newfoundland and Labrador. We all share responsibility for the

environment in our Province, and that is why it is so important to recognize the

great work that is being done by those who demonstrate an impressive passion for

our environment.

I encourage everyone, Mr. Speaker, to look around them at the great work that

is being done to protect and preserve our environment, and submit a nomination

to recognize these outstanding individuals and groups. Further information and

the nomination form can be found on the Department of Environment and

Conservation Web site.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for Torngat Mountains.

MR. EDMUNDS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I thank the minister for the advance copy of his statement. The annual

environmental awards are indeed important and events such as these are something

that should be celebrated throughout the Province.

Mr. Speaker, what I see here is a situation where names may not have been

submitted and with just two days left, I would encourage that more effort be put

into these awards and having people in place before the deadlines do come upon

us.

Mr. Speaker, I know there are many individuals, groups and businesses in our

Province that are leading the way in environmental awareness. I, too, encourage

individuals to have their names put forward for these awards.

Thank you.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for St. John's East.

MR. MURPHY: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I would also like to thank the minister for the advance copy of his

statement.

All projects, of course, having to do with the environment are very

noteworthy. We can talk about a couple of projects that I have run into in a

very short parliamentary career so far. I can note, for example, Mr. Juergen

Schau's project dealing with puffins down in the District of Ferryland. I can

talk about the Salmonid Association dealing with the Rennie's River project.

Hopefully, they are going to be introducing salmon, for example, in the Rennie's

Mill River.

I would be remiss, as well, if I did not talk about some of the groups in

Newfoundland and Labrador that do things without government funding or have lost

government funding. The Newfoundland and Labrador Environmental Network, for

example, has lost funding in this last budgetary process. We are at risk of

losing that particular umbrella organization within the Province.

I ask government to reconsider sometimes where their monies should be

directed. If we are to be out there looking after our environment we need to put

money upfront sometimes in order to enjoy the rewards of environmental

protection. I would also like to say that some people out there do it for

absolutely nothing, and I can think of the Grand Riverkeepers in Labrador. I can

think of the Sandy Pond Alliance out there that are working so hard for

environmental protection in this Province.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: Oral Questions.

Oral Questions

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Official Opposition.

MR. BALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

There will be fewer acute care beds in the new Corner Brook hospital, and to

accommodate this downsizing the plan is to shorten hospital stays by 25 per

cent. We all know that regional health authorities are undergoing efficiency

reviews and that nursing positions may be cut. Research, however, shows that

when nursing staffing levels go down, length of stays go up.

I ask the Minister of Health: Do you really think that cutting nursing and

shortening hospital stays can be achieved simultaneously when research shows

otherwise?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS SULLIVAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, we have proposed a facility for Corner Brook that will be second

to none.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS SULLIVAN: We are looking at $500 million to $600 million worth of

expenditure. It will be a flagship service for the entire of the Province, Mr.

Speaker. It will be a model that we are going to want to use in the entire of

the Province.

Mr. Speaker, we have had some disagreements around what the numbers look like

in terms of acute care. When we received the report, Mr. Speaker, what we got

was a report that emphasized the importance of the right service to the right

clients at the right time.

In the Corner Brook hospital, Mr. Speaker, or the Western Memorial Hospital,

we are looking at being able to put forward 260 beds.

Mr. Speaker, I hope I get another question so I can continue.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The Leader of the Official Opposition.

MR. BALL: The minister does not have to worry about questions coming from

the West Coast about the new hospital. There are lots of questions coming out

there. There is lots of misinformation too, I might add, Mr. Speaker.

Today, we will be presenting a petition on behalf of the Newfoundland and

Labrador Nurses' Union. This petition has 4,500 names from the residents of

Central Newfoundland regarding cuts to nursing positions in the region.

I ask the Minister of Health: Is this a compelling argument or is this just

noise?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS SULLIVAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, further to the last question, I just want to follow up that we

will have 260 beds in there that will more than adequately meet the needs of the

people of the Western Region of the Province.

With regard to the nursing question that he is asking about in Central

Health, Mr. Speaker, what we are talking about in Central Health is implementing

models of nursing care that have been on the go since 2006. There is nothing new

that is happening there, Mr. Speaker.

In fact, what we are talking about in long-term care, the new skills mix

ratio, came about as a result of a provincial committee that was put in place

and recommended this new skills mix that will often see, Mr. Speaker, more

people working within our health facilities.

Again, I am hoping for another question.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The Leader of the Official Opposition.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. BALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The hallmark of this government continues to be secrecy. Following on the

steps of twelve senior appointments, hidden by this government, it appointed a

transition team to oversee school board collapse without any public input.

I ask the minister: Will he table the detailed mandate of the transition

team, which would include timelines for accountability and the autonomy that is

has provided through this board?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Education.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. JACKMAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

A transition committee that is made of up of trustees from the four existing

boards Mr. Lorne Wheeler this morning, the Chair of that committee, is in

contact with the individuals who make up that transition team. Things are

progressing quite well.

Mr. Speaker, if I were to interfere, I would assume the member would talk

about political interference. The reason for the transition committee is we will

allow them to do their work. They will determine and move ahead with it to

ensure we continue with a quality education in Newfoundland and Labrador.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The Leader of the Official Opposition.

MR. BALL: I will ask the minister a simple question here now, then: If

they came back with a recommendation not to go to one school board, would you

accept that recommendation?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Education.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. JACKMAN: Mr. Speaker, that is putting the cart before the horse. We

have a transition committee in place. I would suggest anyone out there who has

suggestions, please put them forward to the transition committee, and we will

then move ahead with the planning that we need to ensure that it is a smooth

process.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The Leader of the Official Opposition.

MR. BALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I believe the minister by his own admission just put the cart before the

horse. That was not the transition team or the trustees that you could actually

report to. It was this government who made the decision and then asked for

information later.

Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Education has stated that the mega-school board

approach is based on changing demographics. So I ask the minister: Has

government carried out a proper study to determine if one board is even

manageable in this Province?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Education.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. JACKMAN: Mr. Speaker, I am going to ask the member again: Is he

willing to stand up and say that we will allow the boards to continue and then

take away from the students and the teachers? Is that what he is saying?

I will quote another one from one of the members opposite in the Liberals in

1999, Mr. Speaker, "Today we are at 97,000. I am sure the members opposite do

not expect us to maintain the same level of teachers in the system with that

kind of declining student enrolment. Maybe they do, but it is always easy to

promise when you do not have to deliver."

This is about efficiency. We are determined to put it in the hands of

teachers and students, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The Leader of the Official Opposition.

MR. BALL: I think the minister missed the question again, because the

question was about if it is manageable, not about the efficiency, I say, Mr.

Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

MR. BALL: Mr. Speaker, the NLTA stresses that a 40 per cent cut to

needs-based teaching will be detrimental to teachers dealing with complex issues

like autism, drugs, and bullying in our system.

So I ask the minister: By making these cuts, how much money do you really

plan to save on the backs of our most vulnerable, our children?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Education.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. JACKMAN: Mr. Speaker, I will caution the hon. member, because I

mentioned in here he mentioned cuts to services for students with autism. Mr.

Speaker, we are not cutting that.

I will tell you, Mr. Speaker, in 2007, despite a 2,200 student decline, we

put thirty-eight additional teachers in the system. In 2008, with another 1,400

student decline, we added another sixty-five. With the needs-based formula that

came in 2008, there are an additional 265 teachers in the system today because

of that. Never question our commitment to education.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Official Opposition.

MR. BALL: I will ask the minister one more time: How much money do you

expect to save by cutting the needs-based system by 40 per cent? How much? What

is the dollar value?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Education.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. JACKMAN: Mr. Speaker, I am going to speak again to our commitment to

the education system. This education system is staffed and funded now better

than ever in the history of this Province. Our commitment, Mr. Speaker, has been

a 42 per cent increase in funding for education since we came into government in

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Official Opposition.

MR. BALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The minister who is making the decision obviously does not know how much

savings he is making from this decision. Mr. Speaker, the message is loud and

clear. Educators, administrators, and school boards are warning that government

cuts to 160 positions will seriously impact the education of our students.

I ask the minister: Why is he refusing to listen to this compelling argument,

or is this just noise?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Education.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. JACKMAN: Mr. Speaker, no changes to classroom caps, no cuts to

special education services, no cuts to supports for special needs students, no

cuts to student assistants. Mr. Speaker, that speaks to our investment in front

line services where it is most important.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Official Opposition.

MR. BALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Well, there is a full litany and a full list of cuts I say, Mr. Speaker. I

believe the minister, quite frankly, just ignored to list those.

The day before government dropped the Budget and laid off 1,000

Newfoundlanders and Labradorians, they made ten secret appointments to the civil

service. Then they added another one on Budget day and another one the day

after, for a total of twelve. Traditionally, senior appointments are announced

by a press release, which would explain the background of the person who got the

job and the rationale behind it.

Why was there no public release at that time?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

During the Budget process, we actually eliminated ten positions from the

number of executive positions in government, bringing it from 121 to 111. The

appointments that were made at the timeframe that the member is talking about

are all people who are within the public service, and they were either moving

laterally or moving within their departments.

There were no new jobs created, Mr. Speaker. They were not new appointments.

For example, in Health and Community Services three people moved. An ADM moved

to another position, a Director became an ADM. So what we have is simply a

situation where there were a number of appointments made. There was no news

release at that point in time, Mr. Speaker, because we knew that the Orders in

Council will be published online very shortly.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MR. BALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

In the Budget announcement it was very clear that if there were vacant

positions within the public service they were not filled. Why were they filled

when the hiring freeze was on?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The hiring freeze related to core departments, or what went on within our

sixteen departments. The appointments to executive positions are within the

discretion of the Premier, Mr. Speaker, and the Order in Council, or the MC

clearly indicated that the appointments to executive appointments did not come

within the hiring freeze.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for Bay of Islands.

MR. JOYCE: Mr. Speaker, the construction of the Sir Ambrose Shea bridge

in Placentia has been stalled because the government refuses to pay its permit

fees or have them included in the tender documents.

I ask the minister: Why is government refusing to pay the Town of Placentia

the cost of its permit fees, which they are allowed to charge under the

Municipalities Act?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Transportation and Works.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I would like to point out to the hon. member and to the members of the House

of Assembly that we invest tens of millions of dollars in roads, provincial

roads, and provincial roadwork throughout the Province. That includes asphalt,

it includes replacement of culverts, it includes building of bridges and

wharves, and nowhere in the Province do we pay municipal permit fees, Mr.

Speaker, while we build those highway infrastructures.

I will just use as an example, Team Gushue Highway, a big project being

conducted by this government, going right through the centre of St. John's, zero

dollars for permits. The new overpass at Topsail Road and Kenmount Road, just

recently built with no permits. The Conception Bay South Bypass Road another

significant investment by this Province bridges being built out there, Mr.

Speaker, at no cost of permits.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for Bay of Islands.

MR. JOYCE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I say to the minister, the reason why they need the fees is that the town has

to protect its infrastructure. They do not have the personnel on staff, the

professionals on staff, to ensure the water and sewer

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

MR. JOYCE: Mr. Speaker, there are two archaeological sites that are going

to be in this area. They need to hire an archaeologist. Do you expect the town

to pay for this?

I ask the minister again: How can you stop paying a fee for the town which is

under the Municipalities Act, which they can charge, that you are arbitrarily

saying no, we are not going to pay this fee?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Transportation and Works.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, the first thing I would like to straighten out in the

preamble

of the hon. member opposite is that the infrastructure we are building there is

infrastructure belonging to the taxpayers of Newfoundland and Labrador. It is a

piece of provincial infrastructure, part of our provincial road network that

extends throughout Newfoundland and Labrador.

As for the second part of his question, as far as archaeology concerns go

and there are issues regarding archaeology, as addressed by the hon. member

opposite our staff, the senior staff, senior officials in my department have

been working very closely with the town in regard to engineering, in regard to

archaeological needs, the resources that the town has versus the resources that

the Province can bring forward and assist them with, and those discussions will

continue, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The Member for Bay of Islands.

MR. JOYCE: Mr. Speaker, in 2007 the development of the RNC headquarters

in St. John's was announced and the total cost was budgeted to be $48 million

and the completion by 2012. We now know from the ATIPP request submitted by our

office that the cost is expected to be over $57 million and it is not going to

be finished until the earliest at 2014.

I ask the minister: How can your budget process be so wrong and yet have

another project be so over budget?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Transportation and Works.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The redevelopment of the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary headquarters site in

the centre of St. John's is a significant project for this Province and for this

government. It is another benchmark of the investments that we are making in the

Province and the infrastructure of the Province.

This project began many years ago, Mr. Speaker. It began in 2007. At the

time, because the RNC continue to operate and function in that site they are a

twenty-four hour, seven-day week service it was believed very early in the

project that the use of the site could continue while the project continued;

however, Mr. Speaker, after a period of time when engineers began to look inside

the building to see what work was actually necessary, and that quite often takes

some time to do, a better understanding was grasped after the project proceeded.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The Member for Bay of Islands.

MR. JOYCE: Mr. Speaker, the RNC building is now expected to be almost $10

million over budget. That is almost a 20 per cent increase in cost.

I ask the minister: How can you be part of a government that says the Muskrat

Falls Project will not have any cost overruns, but every project that you were

involved with in the last three years is from 20 per cent to 50 per cent in cost

overruns?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Transportation and Works.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. DAVIS: Mr. Speaker, what the member opposite is failing to point out

is that there is a significant difference in a renovation, a significant

renovation project, versus a new build. When you get into a renovation project,

the engineering design work is done to the best of the abilities of the

engineers and the designers who look at the project.

Not until you get inside the walls of a project and you start taking down

walls, you start looking at mechanical, you look at electrical and you look at

structures, do you get an actual determination of the scope of work that is

needed. It is very different from Muskrat Falls, Mr. Speaker, which is going to

be a great project for Newfoundland and Labrador and is going to be a great

project for generations to come.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The Member for Torngat Mountains.

MR. EDMUNDS: Mr. Speaker, last week when I asked the Minister of

Environment about an oil slick near Fogo, he put it off as a federal issue.

Environment Canada has since confirmed an oil slick in the area and is working

to pinpoint the source.

I ask the minister: What new information does he have on this issue and what

is the provincial government doing to assist the investigation?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Environment and Conservation.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. HEDDERSON: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

In my response last week I certainly indicated that it was a federal

responsibility, but being a federal responsibility does not mean that the

provincial government are not involved. As well, we went to the main source,

asked the right questions and were told, basically, that there was an

investigation on the go as to the type of oil slick that it was. We have been

further advised that they are going further into their investigation and going

underneath the sea to see exactly what is down there.

I will tell the member we are involved. Again, kudos to the federal

government for being on top of this, moving forward, and trying to get to the

bottom of a very serious issue.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for Torngat Mountains, for a very quick

question without

preamble.

MR. EDMUNDS: I ask the Minister of Fisheries and Aquaculture: What is

your department's role in this investigation and what risk does this oil slick

pose to our fish stocks in the area?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Environments and Conservation, for

a quick response.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. HEDDERSON: Again, very quickly, Mr. Speaker, I would give some sense

of comfort to the member opposite by saying that all aspects of this spill are

being looked at. There has been monitoring; all resources have been thrown at

it. We as a provincial government are making sure that everything has been done

to the satisfaction and we hope that the end result will be a very positive one.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The Leader of the Third Party.

MS MICHAEL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Government announced today that it has lifted the temporary suspension on

hiring, saying recruitment for government jobs will begin as of today. The

timing of this announcement is perplexing. The release says that there has been

an accumulation of vacancies because of normal employee turnover, retirement,

and long-term leave.

Mr. Speaker, I ask the Minister of Finance: Were these positions immune from

the bumping process that has just gone on in public sector? If so, why?

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Yes, Mr. Speaker, we were criticized for bringing in the

hiring freeze and now we are being criticized for lifting the hiring freeze.

Mr. Speaker, the hiring freeze was brought in because we wanted to get the

full picture that exists in government in terms of the number of people who had

jobs and how it related to the core mandate review. What has happened is that

there are no new positions being created. The positions that we are talking

about have funding in Budget 2013.

What happened is that the exemptions to the hiring freeze were very difficult

to come by. So what we are doing now is we have a new process in place that will

have strict criteria. All filling of positions within government will have to

follow that procedure, Mr. Speaker. There is nothing suspicious that I am aware

of and it had nothing to do with the bumping process.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Third Party.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS MICHAEL: The minister did not answer the question. I wanted to know

why they were not a part of the bumping process. If people could be bumped into

those, why were they not bumped into them? That is the question. He is not going

to answer it, so I will move on.

Mr. Speaker, the government says it remains committed to providing job

experiences for students and will continue to have a program for co-op students

and summer students.

Mr. Speaker, I ask the Minister of Finance: Is this government committing to

keeping the same number of co-op and summer jobs for summer students who greatly

need the employment experience as they have had before?

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I can tell the member opposite that the e-mail from which she got her

question, I replied to the same gentleman earlier today and said that student

jobs and co-op student jobs are still in place. I indicated approximately a

month ago that students would still be hired, that the hiring freeze would not

apply to them.

We are certainly committed to ensuring that students are employed, Mr.

Speaker. There will be jobs here for them this summer, co-op students and all

students, because we understand that the youth of our Province need jobs in the

summertime and we will provide those jobs for them.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Third Party.

MS MICHAEL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

My question came directly from the release that came from the minister. That

is where my question came from.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

MS MICHAEL: Very often our students hope that such temporary situations

will lead to permanent jobs. This announcement is cold comfort to all those

students, many of whom will have to leave the Province due to the chill that has

fallen over it.

Mr. Speaker, I ask the Minister of Finance: What that commitment will do for

students who have graduated from programs and need permanent employment?

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Yes, Mr. Speaker, the member opposite still seems to be in

the 1990s when there might not have been as many jobs available.

Let me tell you the situation that currently exists in our Province, Mr.

Speaker. We have for students the lowest tuition fees in the country. We are

second in the country in weekly earnings. We have more people working today than

ever in our history.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Since 2003, our unemployment rate has declined by 3.9

percentage points, the lowest in thirty-seven years, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Capital investment has increased in our Province by 170 per

cent since 2003. It is the land of opportunity for new students and they do not

only have to rely upon government for jobs, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Third Party.

MS MICHAEL: Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

I would now ask

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

The hon. the Leader of the Third Party.

MS MICHAEL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I now ask the minister to table tomorrow in this House of Assembly the number

of people who have to leave the Province to get jobs.

Mr. Speaker, in the Sustainability Plan it says that in years four to ten

government will continue to focus on innovation, diversification, and debt

reduction.

Mr. Speaker, I ask the Minister of Finance to outline for us what great

innovations this government has in mind for economic diversification since there

is actually nothing outlined in the current so-called Sustainability Plan?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Let me continue where I just left off. What do we have happening in this

Province in the next number of years? Building Muskrat Falls, 3,000 jobs, many

of which are union members, and the NDP do not support that, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: We have Bull Arm, Hebron going, 3,000 jobs, and mostly union

jobs. The NDP probably do not support that either, Mr. Speaker. We have

continued diversity in the industries as outlined by the Minister of Innovation,

Business and Rural Development.

What we have, Mr. Speaker, is in this year's Budget alone another $1 billion

to support children and families. We have lowered taxes by $500 million since

2007. We have the most competitive tax regime in Atlantic Canada. The good

things continue, Mr. Speaker, and I would suggest to the member: read the

Budget.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Third Party.

MS MICHAEL: Mr. Speaker, Statistics Canada explained this Province's

notable fall in GDP last year, a whopping 4.6 per cent, as a decline in oil and

gas extraction due to maintenance work as well as a decline of metal ore mining.

That should not have surprised this government, Mr. Speaker, yet they projected

that 0.01 per cent of GDP would be what we would have this year.

I ask the Minister of Finance: Once again, how could they have been so far

out in their projections?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

GDP, as Telegram James was noticing on Twitter today, Mr. Speaker, is a

notoriously unreliable measurement in a small resource-based economy like ours.

Oil production is up, GDP is up; oil production is down, GDP is down.

I did indicate, Mr. Speaker, that oil production is an issue that we have to

deal with. We get the numbers twice a year, once in January and once in June. In

one year, Mr. Speaker, a couple of years ago, the C-NLOPB projections were off

by 18 million barrels. Obviously, Mr. Speaker, GDP will be affected.

What we have to look at is what is happening in this Province. Again, let me

repeat that we have the lowest unemployment rate in thirty-seven years and more

people working today than ever in our history.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

The Member for The Straits White Bay North.

MR. MITCHELMORE: Mr. Speaker, advanced telecommunication is essential to

economic development. Last month the feds announced $1.35 million to improve

broadband services to North West River and Sheshatshiu. Announced in 2011, the

Province, the feds, Bell, SmartLabrador and Nalcor were investing $24 million to

provide fiber backbone to 19,000 people in Central and Western Labrador.

Mr. Speaker, with Muskrat Fall passing along the communities of the South

Coast of Labrador and the Great Northern Peninsula, I ask the Minister of IBRD:

When can they expect to see similar investments of adding broadband and dealing

with chronic capacity issues, or will they continue to remain forgotten?

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Innovation, Business and Rural

Development.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. HUTCHINGS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, we have been heavily involved as we know, the hon. member knows

and the members in this House, in terms of high speed and rural broadband

initiatives for the past number of years. We have increased it now to almost 89

per cent on the Island and over 95 per cent in Labrador. This year's Budget is

$6.3 million again to reinvest.

Coming this week, again, as part of the second RBI, we will be announcing

twenty-six additional communities that will receive through the program. We are

continuing to build it.

With regard to Nalcor, in consultations with them, when they build the

transmission line there will be fibre on that transmission line which will come

down to Southern Labrador. There could be opportunities there, we believe there

are opportunities there, and we will maximize them for the people of Labrador.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The Member for The Straits White Bay North.

MR. MITCHELMORE: I certainly hope the minister is not going to forget the

Great Northern Peninsula as well.

Mr. Speaker, Air Access Strategy funding was cut midway through its five

years. As well, the five-year Northern Strategy Plan of 2007 says it will

finalize its decision on a central airport for Southern Labrador.

The people do not have a reliable air service, limiting economic growth in

Southeastern Labrador, and are calling for an enhanced service capable of

handling aircraft larger than a Twin Otter.

Mr. Speaker, I ask the Minister of IBRD: What is the status of a centralized

airstrip, or are you abandoning this commitment like the Air Access Strategy?

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Transportation and Works.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

There are airstrips located throughout Labrador and also throughout the

Island of Newfoundland. We realize, understand and appreciate that the airstrips

in Labrador in particular are of significant importance to the people of

Labrador. We have a funding arrangement with the federal government; it is an

annual funding arrangement. We continue to have discussions with them on ways

that we can make improvement to airstrips and air services in Labrador through a

way to enhance that agreement between us and the federal government. We will

continue to make those advancements, Mr. Speaker.

MR. SPEAKER: The Member for St. John's East.

MR. MURPHY: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Last week our private member's motion in the House called for government to

implement a strategy geared toward roads and the provincial ferry system. Sadly,

the government voted against the motion, even though they put it in the election

Blue Book, as far back as 2003.

If government says it already has a strategy for ferries, then where is it?

Will they make the documents public?

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Transportation and Works.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I would like to thank the hon. member for giving me an opportunity to rise

again and talk about the great investments we are making in ferry services

throughout Newfoundland and Labrador.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Order, please!

MR. DAVIS: Mr. Speaker, we currently have an RFP that has been issued to

build a replacement vessel for the Captain Earl Winsor which provides

service to the people of Change Islands and Fogo Island. It is providing very

good service to the people of Change Islands and Fogo Island, Mr. Speaker. It is

going to be a significant vessel, a significant build, the largest one, probably

ever, that we have done in the Province.

As well, Mr. Speaker, that RFP includes the ability now to build and

construct a new forty-two metre swing vessel for the people of the Province.

This will be similar to the Grace Sparkes and Hazel McIsaac which

is providing good services to the people of Newfoundland and Labrador, Mr.

Speaker, and we will continue to make those investments in ferry services

throughout the Province.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for St. John's East.

MR. MURPHY: I would say, Mr. Speaker, he is not giving his fellow Member

for Conception Bay East Bell Island a very good hand answering that one.

Mr. Speaker, the motion also talked about the need for a permanent road

construction strategy that government also voted against. What is the difficulty

that government must see that they cannot put forward a transparent road

strategy for this Province?

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Transportation and Works.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, we have two vessels that are providing services to the people of

Bell Island. While vessels require having routine maintenance, at times they

have mechanical matters that need to be addressed as they operate. Like any

mechanical item, as it is utilized, it requires maintenance and it requires

work.

I would say to the hon. member opposite that the two vessels that we have

operating right now, considering the vessels that we have available to us, are

providing a continuous and a good service for the people of Bell Island.

As for the rest of his question, Mr. Speaker, on planning for roads and the

development, we have made a commitment to the people of the Province that we

would work to come forward with a greater plan for our infrastructure within the

Province and we intend to do that.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The time for Question Period has expired.

Presenting Reports by Standing and Select Committees.

Tabling of documents.

Notices of Motion.

Notices of Motion

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Government House Leader.

MR. KING: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, I give notice under Standing Order 11 that I shall move that

this House not adjourn 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday, April 30, 2013; and further, I give

notice, under Standing Order 11, I shall move that this House not adjourn 10:00

p.m. on Tuesday, April 30, 2013.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for St. John's West.

MR. CRUMMELL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I would like to move the following private member's resolution for Wednesday,

May 1, this coming Wednesday, seconded by the Member for Bonavista North:

BE IT RESOLVED that this hon. House supports this government's actions to

ensure that public programs and services for Newfoundlanders and Labradorians

are designed and delivered in ways that are results focused and effective, as

well as innovative, efficient, and affordable.

MR. SPEAKER: Answers to Questions for which Notice has been Given.

Petitions.

Petitions

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for St. Barbe.

MR. BENNETT: Mr. Speaker, a petition to the hon. House of Assembly of the

Province of Newfoundland and Labrador in Parliament Assembled, the petition of

the undersigned humbly sheweth:

WHEREAS the offshore of the West Coast of the Island of Newfoundland is

recognized as a region containing potentially billions of barrels of oil; and

WHEREAS hydraulic fracturing could be an accepted and effective method of

petroleum discovery and exploration, and is compatible with the protection of

the natural environment and water sources when executed within the context of a

comprehensive regulatory framework; and

WHEREAS the petroleum exploration sector needs the certainty and confidence

of a stable regulatory regime; and

WHEREAS with that regulatory regime, oil discovery and industry development

could provide unprecedented economic opportunity and bring people home to a

currently economically challenged area; and

WHEREAS the undersigned support properly regulated exploration and

development of the oil and gas resource in the Province;

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

MR. BENNETT: WHEREUPON the undersigned, your petitioners, humbly pray and

call upon the House of Assembly to urge the Government of Newfoundland and

Labrador to introduce a regulatory framework immediately under which hydraulic

fracturing could proceed safely, and move this industry forward in Western

Newfoundland.

Mr. Speaker, as all of us are aware, there are significant news stories

regarding hydraulic fracturing. Many of these stories are sensational. Many of

the stories have absolutely nothing to do with the type of exploration that is

contemplated in this region. It is incomprehensible why people, for example, a

member of the town council in Bay of Islands in the last few days, talked about

having sea spray on their house windows and now expecting to have chemicals from

hydraulic fracturing from out in Bay of Islands spray on their windows.

Some of these things are absolutely ludicrous. Mr. Speaker, the things people

think of as they see a movie where somebody turns on a water tap and sees flames

come out of their water faucets. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

There is a great concern in the region that I represent, that the people who

are putting forth these unfounded histrionic complaints may carry the day. There

is such a groundswell on the ground by people who want to see common sense,

regulated, appropriate development. The petitions have started to come in, and I

expect them to come steadily from the people who are pro-development and

pro-employment.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for St. John's Centre.

MS ROGERS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

To the hon. House of Assembly of the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador in

Parliament assembled, the petition of the undersigned residents of Newfoundland

and Labrador humbly sheweth:

WHEREAS as a result of a recommendation in the Green report about wrongdoing

in the House of Assembly, there is now legislation that protects anyone who

speaks up with evidence of financial abuse or other impropriety in the

legislative branch; and

WHEREAS it is unfair for one group of civil servants to be protected by

whistle-blower legislation when another group is not; and

WHEREAS Justice Green stated that the financial wrongdoing in the House of

Assembly might have been discovered sooner if whistle-blower legislation had

been in place; and

WHEREAS the Cameron Inquiry into ER-PR testing found that problems with tests

would have come to light sooner, therefore lessoning the impacts on patients, if

whistle-blower legislation had been in place; and

WHEREAS the Task Force on Adverse Events recommended an amendment to the

Regional Health Authorities Act to provide legal protection for employees

reporting occurrences or adverse events; and

WHEREAS whistle-blower legislation is in place elsewhere in Canada and the

provincial government promised similar legislation in the 2007 election but has

not kept that promise;

We the undersigned, petition the House of Assembly to urge government to

enact whistle-blower legislation to protect public sector employees in

provincial departments and agencies, including public corporations, regional

health authorities and schools boards.

And as in duty bound your petitioners will ever pray.

Mr. Speaker, I had the honour yesterday of attending a day of mourning for

workers injured or who have lost their lives on the job. It was quite a moving

ceremony. There were well past 100 people there with over fifty wreaths laid on

behalf of workers and different employers and groups, just to show how this

issue is of growing importance to the people in the Province.

Mr. Speaker, perhaps in some cases we honoured and remembered six injured

workers who died by accidents, this year alone, on the job, and twenty who died

because of workplace related diseases. Perhaps, Mr. Speaker, if we had effective

whistle-blower legislation, protection for people who want to speak out about

unsafe working conditions perhaps that could save lives.

This government once again promised the people of Newfoundland and Labrador

to pass whistle-blower legislation and they have absolutely done nothing to

further this. As a matter of fact, last year, about a year ago, I asked the

Minister of Justice at the time and he said no. This is a sad state of affairs

for our Province.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for Burgeo La Poile.

MR. A. PARSONS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I stand today to enter a petition.

To the hon. House of Assembly of the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador in

Parliament assembled, the petition of the undersigned residents humbly sheweth:

WHEREAS Central Health is planning to reduce the number of registered nurses

working in numerous facilities throughout Central Newfoundland; and

WHEREAS registered nurses and community members from Central Newfoundland

have serious concerns over the impact these staffing changes will have on

patient and resident care; and

WHEREAS registered nurses provide an expert level of care and bring value to

the health care system that no other health care provider can, and registered

nurses are the only nursing professionals who can independently provide care

when health conditions are complex and unstable, and health outcomes are

unpredictable; and

WHEREAS it is proven through research that registered nurses improve patient

outcomes, reduce mortality and enhance the quality of care, and that higher

registered nurse ratios result in fewer death, pressure ulcers, pneumonia,

post-operative infections, urinary tract infections, gastrointestinal bleeds and

cardiac arrests, with results also including shorter lengths of stay, improved

failure to rescue rates, and superior organizational effectiveness and budgetary

outcomes;

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

I ask all members if they would take their private conversations outside the

Chambers, please.

I recognize the Member for Burgeo La Poile in presenting a petition.

MR. A. PARSONS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

WHEREUPON the undersigned, your petitioners, humbly pray and call upon the

House of Assembly to urge government to call on Central Regional Health

Authority to re-examine the proposed registered nurse reductions, ensuring high

quality care for the residents of Central Newfoundland.

And as in duty bound your petitioners will ever pray.

Mr. Speaker, this is probably the largest petition I have ever entered in

this House of Assembly, with over 4,500 names of people from the Central area

who have signed, people who live in communities all over Central, communities

that are represented by members, especially on the government side. I would

think the 4,500 names signed here being entered today is what we would call

compelling argument.

One of the things we talked about when we did Health budget Estimates the

other night was trying to reduce patient stay. At the same time, talking about

how much cost that has but if you are going to reduce the nursing complement,

studies show that the stay is going to go up. So, unless there is some research

that we are unaware of, I do not know how this is possible.

There are a number of opportunities we have to look at this, to make sure

that we are making the right choice, and to listen to the experts in the field,

to work with them to make sure that the proper health and care is provided to

residents. We look at the situation out in Lewisporte where we are going to have

one RN on a long-term care overnight facility, just one for a number of

patients. This is just one of the concerns that we have.

I am very happy to stand here today and enter the concerns of the residents

of Central Newfoundland. It is not going to stop there. I have fears that this

is going to continue elsewhere, that it is going to move to Western Newfoundland

and up to Labrador Grenfell. We have to make sure that with these Budget cuts do

not come reduced health and safety for the people of this Province.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Government House Leader.

MR. KING: Mr. Speaker, I would like to give notice to the House that the

motion laid before us a few moments ago by the Member for St. John's West will

be the private member's motion that government will debate this coming

Wednesday, Private Members' Day.

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for St. Barbe.

MR. BENNETT: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

A petition to the hon. House of Assembly of the Province of Newfoundland and

Labrador in Parliament assembled, the petition of the undersigned residents

humbly sheweth:

WHEREAS there has been an agreement between the Federation of Newfoundland

Nation Band; and

WHEREAS persons submitted applications with the required documents for

registration in the band up to the application deadline of November 30, 2012;

and

WHEREAS the reported number of applications received by the Qalipu Mi'kmaq

First Nation Band are in excess of 100,000; and

WHEREAS the reported number of applicants now registered as members is

approximately 22,000; and

WHEREAS the agreement between the Federation of Newfoundland Indians and the

scheduled to end on March 31, 2013; and

WHEREAS the Qalipu Mi'kmaq First Nation Band Chief has requested, but has not

received, an extension to the agreement to process the remaining applications;

and

WHEREAS to date there is no decision on how to deal with the remaining

applications;

WHEREUPON the undersigned, your petitioners, humbly pray and call upon the

House of Assembly to urge the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador to work

with the Newfoundland Federation of Indians and the Government to Canada to

provide a fair and equal review of all their applications.

As in duty bound your petitioners will ever pray.

Mr. Speaker, the applications have been filed. More recently, we have noticed

maybe a thawing in what the federal counterpart has said. They finally

acknowledge that they were absolutely overwhelmed with petitions. Nevertheless,

Mr. Speaker, that does not relieve our government of the obligation to intervene

on behalf of between 70,000 and 80,000 more people who are unrecognized, who are

residents of this Province.

Mr. Speaker, what excuse can this government possibly have when people are

bringing petitions day after day after day asking and outlining these

circumstances to say that we want to have our petition heard, we want to have

our applications reviewed, and we want this matter to move forward? They have

established a significant Facebook presence. They are following this thing.

There have been public demonstrations and significant input. This is simply a

request of government, by these people, to intervene with the federal

counterpart and move this file forward.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Government House Leader.

MR. KING: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, I call from the Order Paper, Motion 1, that this House approves

in general the budgetary policy of the government. The Budget Speech, Mr.

Speaker.

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for St. John's Centre.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS ROGERS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I am grateful for the opportunity to stand in this House today to speak to

the Budget, and I am especially honoured to speak on behalf of the good people

of St. John's Centre.

Mr. Speaker, the last ten years have been a very

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

MS ROGERS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, the last ten years have been a very interesting time for the

people of Newfoundland and Labrador. There were promises and celebrations and

declarations. We saw roads built, school books paid for, tuition reduced, more

people were hired through the public service. There were jobs and a Poverty

Reduction Strategy that promised to make Newfoundland and Labrador the Province

with the lowest level of poverty by the end of 2013. Newfoundland and Labrador

was open for business.

There was a Youth Retention Strategy to encourage our young people to stay in

this land of opportunity. There was even money to help you when you had a baby,

and folks were coming back home. We were, said the government, flush with cash,

and never, never in our history did we experience so much prosperity. We

celebrated, Mr. Speaker, with our artists. We sang, and there was dancing and

painting and making of movies, and, oh yeah, there was making of TV. Mr.

Speaker, it just happens to be the International Day of Dance.

We were going to be a powerhouse of electricity. We were going to dam Muskrat

Falls and the US was going to be pounding on our doors looking for power. We

were going to be even richer. Oil flowed and it was good. Yes, by God, we were a

have Province. Why, they even considered having a holiday to celebrate that, but

on Tuesday, March 26, 2013 it all came to a screeching halt.

This government, Mr. Speaker, the same government who promised so much ground

to a halt, bellowing: Wait, things have changed and now we are taking it back.

They are taking a lot of it back from a lot of people. Thursday, in this House,

a member of this government actually stood up and said that the people of this

Province got spoiled, and that public servants got spoiled. So the undoing

began.

This Budget 2013 is one of the most regressive Budgets this Province has

seen. After so much was promised, where did it go, Mr. Speaker? Where did our

prosperity go, the prosperity that belongs to the people of Newfoundland and

Labrador?

This time last year, the former Minister of Finance told reporters the day

before the Budget came down, "We could have done it in one year We could have

cut $258 million, and cut a lot of jobs. We decided that we're not going to do

it in one or two years. We decided that we're going to have a 10-year plan and

that we're going to get where we have to be over that time."

In a CBC

article last year, in an interview with the former Minister of

Finance, he "indicated that some savings could be realized through attrition.

He noted that 24 per cent of the core civil service will be eligible to retire

over the next five years. Other workers, he said, will depart of their own

accord for the private sector."

The minister said, "We will take advantage of those voluntary retirements and

those voluntary resignations in order to manage the size of our core public

service so that it's sustainable over the long term". He said, Mr. Speaker, that

we are not going to do it in one or two years, but over a period of ten years.

"In fact, the 10-year plan did not appear to be referenced at all in the

reams of budget documents that were tabled" last year. "It instead came up

when" the minister " was questioned by reporters.

"While there are currently more than 9,000 people employed in core government

departments," the minister said " there are no targets involved.

"Nobody is fired; nobody is let go,' he said. But we still will accomplish

our objective to reduce the size of the public service.'"

So, Mr. Speaker, what a difference a year makes. The loss of upwards of 2,000

public service jobs through layoffs, attrition, and leaving vacant positions

unfilled. The cancelling of the Family Violence Intervention Court, a court that

reduced recidivism in family violence by 75 per cent, that protected women,

children, and health offenders rehabilitate. It was a shining example across the

country.

The privatization of part of our basic education system through the

discontinuation of Adult Basic Education at the College of the North Atlantic;

cancelling of the ABE program at the Waterford Centre that provided total

support and wraparound services for people with complex mental issues, people

who could in no way pursue their education in a mainstream school setting,

cancelled without notice.

There are cuts so deep to the justice system that they threw the system into

chaos; cuts so deep to fish and wildlife enforcement that many parts of the

Province are covered by lone officers who are armed lone officers, working

alone and will have to go off by themselves far into the woods to pursue armed

poachers. Mr. Speaker, this is actually the case. This is madness, to send our

armed officers into the woods to apprehend groups of people who are armed, all

by themselves, Mr. Speaker. It is total madness.

There are cuts of $10 million to the Newfoundland and Labrador Housing

Corporation when we are in the middle of a housing crisis Province-wide with

sky-rocketing costs and 0 per cent vacancy rates, especially in the areas where

large-scale resource development is happening. This housing crisis is affecting

young people, seniors, young working families, and there is no relief in sight.

This government has washed its hands and said it is not our problem; the

market will take care of it. Well, Mr. Speaker, the market is not taking care of

it, and this government is not taking care of it. The cutting back of the

Residential Energy Efficiency Program by 50 per cent when worldwide governments

are helping their citizens make their homes as energy efficient as possible.

This is happening all over the world. This cut, Mr. Speaker, absolutely flies in

the face of logic.

There are no publicly administered and provided home care programs. Families

are struggling to care for their elderly. No real child care program. Families

once again are struggling trying to co-ordinate and pay for child care. More and

more of our seniors are slipping into poverty using food banks, spending 50 per

cent and more of their meagre incomes on housing.

Health care, the loss of 125 managers, and we do not yet know who or what

those jobs are and how it will affect the service to the public. The loss of

some of our youngest and our brightest, and our most committed and dedicated

young people working in the health and wellness promotion plan, gone without

notice, Mr. Speaker, absolutely gone. The cutting of hundreds of EAS jobs, and,

Mr. Speaker, there is more to come. This is only touching the tip of the

iceberg.

So, Mr. Speaker, what happened? What went wrong? Last year, the former

Minister of Finance said: the deficit was expected to be $258.4 million in

2012-2013. Only four months ago, when the Premier was pushing Muskrat Falls

through the House with no proper debate, ignoring our Public Utilities Board,

she said we were in great financial shape.

Only a few months ago, the Minister of Finance said our projected deficit was

going to be $1.6 billion. Then within a month of that, it was changed to $563.8

million. People joked that if they held off with the Budget a few more months,

then maybe we would actually be in a surplus at that rate. Really, Mr. Speaker,

it is not a laughing matter; these are serious issues.

Mr. Speaker, we have all heard these numbers, but really what do they mean?

Last week the Premier said that 100 people were still working at Whitbourne

youth detention facility and looking after only nine youth; she said it as an

accusation. Who exactly was she accusing? Her government has been at the helm

for ten years now. How long did her government let that go on? Why did she not

work with the unions and the public service to figure out a solution sooner?

On Monday, April 15, the Premier said she actually said this we cannot

continue to have waste and spending and extravagance and poor management. Who

has been wasting the money of the people of Newfoundland and Labrador? Who has

been spending? Where is the extravagance and poor management? Who has been

responsible for this? Who exactly is the Premier looking to blame? This

government has been the only ones at the helm for ten years. Maybe she is

blaming former Premier Danny Williams. Who knows? She must be blaming someone

because she said it has to stop.

For ten years now they have been running the show during years of the highest

revenues this Province has ever experienced. What have they done? They have now

ground to a halt. For ten years they have had no solid plan, no identifiable

economic policy, and no sustainability plan. Now, even in their cuts, there is

no plan. These cuts were done in panic. Even though they knew for years that

there would be a slowdown in oil production, even though that was so absolutely

clear, they were still in a panic. There was no plan for sustainability, no plan

for the cuts.

They say that these cuts were based on many core mandate reviews. Mr.

Speaker, we ask one more time, I ask again no core mandate review could

recommend some of these most reckless and ill-informed cuts. They undertook

these cuts that created chaos in the public service fundamental, essential

services needed for our communities to function. They have caused devastation in

the lives of the people who have lost their jobs. These are not just numbers of

positions, but people's lives with families and communities.

Removing upwards of 2,000 jobs from our economy will not stimulate

prosperity. The economic effects will be felt Province-wide. What is driving

this? What is happening? We are so resource rich, yet this government has

presented an austerity Budget.

Again, I must say, what kind of rabbit hole have we fallen into where

everything is not as it seems; where up is down and where prosperity is

austerity? We are seeing it time again. We are seeing it in Europe. We are

seeing it in Spain. We are seeing it in Greece. We are seeing leading economists

saying that austerity plans do not lead to prosperity.

They are not finished yet. They have told us that next year they are going

after Memorial University, they are going after the College of the North

Atlantic, they are going after the Regional Health Authorities, and they are

going after the unfunded pension liability, an unfunded pension liability that

lies at their feet because they are responsible for this.

Mr. Speaker, this government has proven that they cannot govern any more;

they have lost their way. They are dragging us kicking and screaming into a

multi-billion dollar megaproject that no one knows if we even need it and no one

knows how much it will really cost the people of Newfoundland and Labrador in

the end. Guaranteed, Mr. Speaker, we will be paying for it because no one else

will be paying for this.

They have sent out the message loud and clear to our young people who are

wanting to serve the public that Newfoundland and Labrador is now closed for

business. They have destabilized the public service. It will take in some cases

years for people to settle into their new positions and learn their jobs and

become proficient once again.

In a single day, Mr. Speaker, this government has put the kibosh on youth

retention. Once again, this Premier herself said it so succinctly: We cannot

continue to have waste and spending and extravagance and poor management.

No, they cannot. This government itself is admitting to poor management. They

have managed our wealth, the wealth of the people of Newfoundland and Labrador

they have managed our wealth poorly. Instead, they should have been focusing on

how to make life better for our people and their families. They should have been

providing economic stability and certainty. They should have been taking

practical steps to develop a full child care and early learning program that

actually meets the needs of working families.

They should have been establishing a publicly funded and administered home

care program so that families could work without trying to juggle the prices

that come with not sufficient help to care for an elderly parent. They should

have provided the home ownership assistance program that they promised in 2011,

which is not in this Budget, Mr. Speaker. They promised this. They promised the

people of Newfoundland and Labrador a home ownership assistance program in 2011

and it is still not in this Budget. We will not see it at all in this Budget

year. They should have been strengthening our public service rather than

throwing the lives of our public employees into a complete mess.

They say they have based these cuts on the core mandate reviews. I ask this

government once again to release these reviews, release the core mandate reviews

that these cuts were based on. Have they done an impact analysis on the effects

of the loss of all of these jobs on the economy? Have they done that? If so,

release it; release this economic impact analysis that they have done.

Like the ill-conceived cuts in Justice, did they really have a plan? Did they

really know what the results would be on the people of Newfoundland and Labrador

by these ill-conceived cuts?

If we had all-party standing legislative committees, perhaps I know that is

not where the Budget is set we would have been able to help this government

find its way, but we do not and they will not this government refuses. So they

have created this problem. Mr. Speaker, this government has created this problem

all on their own. They have run this Province, as stated by the Premier, with

waste and spending and extravagance and poor management.

They have mismanaged our fishery, a vital renewable resource that built this

Province. They have neglected rural Newfoundland and Labrador; instead, now

offering people money to actually leave it. They have not built a plan for

healthy economic diversity. They have been addicted to oil because they do not

know what else to do. We, as a Province, are not even getting the full benefit

we could be getting from that rich resource.

The role, Mr. Speaker, of government is to help us achieve our hopes and our

dreams, to help us as a people reach where we want to go, how we want to make

sure our resources are best used. This government is now failing the people of

Newfoundland and Labrador miserably. They have proven they can no longer do it.

They are done. Mr. Speaker, they are without direction; they are without plan.

They are in a panic mode. They have abandoned the people of this Province, and

this Budget shows it.

They cannot blame a previous Administration; they are the previous

Administration. They are driven by a poorly-defined ideology, not the intent to

do right by the people of this Province. They have proven to be reactionary, not

proactive, with the finances of the Province. To have relied almost entirely on

oil revenues has been fool-hearted and short-sighted. To plan the finances of

the Province based on the price of oil is akin to using an Ouija board for

budgeting.

There does not appear to be any vision for prosperity. They have mismanaged

any surplus we have had and have proven themselves to be very poor managers of

our money. In 2008, the start of the Budget consultations, the former Minister

of Finance, this is what he said, "After almost 50 years of paying out more than

we have taken in, we are now projecting a surplus for this year. Future success

depends on how responsibly we utilize these revenues today." Wise words, Mr.

Speaker wise words.

This Budget is not a Budget of prosperity, it is not a Budget of hope, and it

is not a Budget of a bright future.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER (Verge): Order, please!

The hon. the Minister of Natural Resources and Attorney General.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. MARSHALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

It is my pleasure to stand here in the House today and speak to this I

think it is the sub-amendment. Basically what has happened, this is the Budget

debate were the Minister of Finance has put forward a motion that this House

supports the budgetary policy of the government, the Leader of the Opposition

then introduced an amendment to that motion, and then there was a sub-amendment.

Now, the reason for the amendment and sub-amendment, of course, is that this

will give members of the House an opportunity to speak on more than one

occasion. We can now all speak on three occasions in this bill. Because it is

what is known as a money bill, we now have the opportunity to speak on topics

that we wish to speak about, including the Budget. We can digress from the

Budget, talk about things that are important to our district, and talk about

things that are of interest to us as MHAs.

Mr. Speaker, I think, since I have been in this House, this is the tenth

Budget in which I have had an opportunity to speak during the debate. I have

given five Budgets myself in my capacity as Minister of Finance, and I am

delighted now to have an opportunity to say a few words about the Budget that my

colleague, the Minister of Finance, has brought down a Budget that is a

responsible Budget, a Budget that is an appropriate Budget for the times that we

find ourselves in.

Mr. Speaker, I heard the Leader of the Opposition speak during his

opportunity I think he had three or four hours to speak on the Budget. One day

he kept saying we are spending too much money. Our government spent too much

money. We are spending too much money we are spending too much money. Then the

next day he criticized the government for reducing its spending. He attacked

every reduction in expenditures that the government made. What is it going to

be, Mr. Speaker? Are we going to be criticized for spending, but on the other

side, we are criticized for not spending. What is it going to be?

That is not a responsible position, Mr. Speaker. A responsible position is to

look at the economy of this Province and to do the right thing. Mr. Speaker, a

number of years ago when the world economy was in what was called the great

recession, what this government did is this government then stimulated the

economy by spending money. It spent money on programs, spent money on

infrastructure. It spent and it spent and it spent, and it did that in

co-operation with every other province in the country.

That originated in a meeting of national Finance Ministers, where the Finance

Ministers met and they said that every country has to stimulate their economies

to try to get the world economy to get out of the great recession that it was

in. Everyone agreed to do that, and we did that.

Mr. Speaker, what you have to do is that you cannot stimulate all the time.

You cannot stimulate every year. What you do is that when the economy is bad and

when you stimulate the economy to try to get it moving, when you stimulate the

economy to try to get some growth, you incur debt to do that. When the economy

comes back and when the economy starts to move now you are in a position to

reduce your spending to pay off the debt you took out when the economy was bad.

You have to do what is appropriate over the business cycle. You cannot spend

more money than is coming in year after year after year; no one can do that. The

result of that will be bankruptcy whether you are a family, whether you are a

business, whether you are a non-profit organization or whether you are a

provincial government.

Mr. Speaker, what our government did that previous governments had not done

is that we ran surpluses. We limited what we spent. We lived within our means.

The money that is coming in and the money that is available the money do not

belong to the government. The money is the people's money; it belongs to the

people of the Province. In my view, Mr. Speaker, the money should be spent on

the people of the Province because they are the people who own it.

Mr. Speaker, we are here to govern. We do not have a machine in the basement

of the Confederation Building or in the Sir Richard Squires Building that prints

money. Only the federal government can do that; only the central bankers can do

that. We have to operate this Province on the revenues that are coming into the

Province on taxation, on fees, on corporate taxation, and on royalties that are

paid for by the people of the Province. It is their money, and that is why I

have always said in this House we have to make sure we spend the money wisely.

Mr. Speaker, we have done that.

One of the things we did not do, and one of the reasons why the bond rating

agencies have been giving this government credit for prudent financial

management notwithstanding the comments coming from opposite that we overspend

or we spent too much money, or that the spending was unsustainable is that we

did not spend every cent coming in. We spent the bulk of it on the people

because it is their money and I do not apologize for that.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. MARSHALL: Mr. Speaker, the other thing we did is we did something

that other governments had failed to do. They failed to put any on the debt. In

other words they borrowed when times were tough; they borrowed when times were

good. They did not care. They kept racking up debt. They kept running deficits,

taking out debt to finance the deficit, taking out debt to build infrastructure.

We did it differently, Mr. Speaker. The money came in and we lived within our

means. The Auditor General has said, and it is in his report every year, that a

government that lives within its means is a government that is running a

surplus. This government, Mr. Speaker, ran six surpluses out of the last eight

years, unprecedented in the history of Newfoundland and Labrador.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. MARSHALL: Mr. Speaker, we also paid down debt. We also lowered taxes

to put money back in people's pockets. Instead of just taking, taking, taking

from the hard-working people of the Province all the time, we left money in

people's pockets so they could spend their money on things that are important to

them. Mr. Speaker, we do not apologize for that. We do not have the lowest taxes

in the country, and I do not want us to have the lowest taxes in the country,

but we have to be competitive. We have to be competitive with other

jurisdictions.

Mr. Speaker, one of the things that have happened here is that we are an

exporting Province. We export our products into the world economy. We do not

control the price of those products, and it has been that way since the first

settlers came here to fish years and years ago. The fish is sold out into the

world market. It is a commodity.

The forestry, our lumber, the pulp and paper, and the newsprint are sold out

into the world economy. It is a commodity. We do not control the price, we are

price takers. Our agricultural products, our lumber, the iron ore from Bell

Island originally and now from Labrador, and nickel, we do not control the

market. It is a global economy and we are price takers.

What happened, Mr. Speaker, is that the global economy turned. Things do not

stay the same. The global economy changed, and, Mr. Speaker, we have to change

with it. We all know that when things are going good, they are not going to be

good forever.

One of the things I used to say is, look out when things are going good for a

long period of time because at some point you are going to get it right between

the eyes. For the same reason, when things are going bad it is important that we

not give up hope because when things are going bad, things are going to change

again. Things will get better.

We have to govern our economy in accordance with good economic policy. That

is what we have to do. When the economy was bad, we stimulated the economy. Mr.

Speaker, this is where, when I look at the ads that NAPE is running on TV. They

are saying, how come there have to be cuts in government spending when the

economy is strong? Well, there is a darn good reason for that. There is a

difference between the economy and the fiscal situation of the Province. There

is a major difference.

If you look at our economy, if we look at that first of all, there are

different parts to the economy. There is the investment sector, there is the

consumer sector, there is the government sector, and there is the export sector.

They are the four areas. So let's look at them.

In the investment sector, we are booming. We have businesses making capital

investments. We have people building buildings. You cannot go anywhere without

seeing condominiums go up and apartment buildings go up, all over the place. We

have Vale. There are 5,000 people working at Vale in that project. You have

people working at Bull Arm now with the Hebron Project. You have people working

on the Muskrat Falls Project.

Just listen, Mr. Speaker. There are more jobs being created in this Province

than at any time in our history. That is incredible. Who would have thought that

today? When our government got into power ten years ago, who would have thought

that nine or ten years later we would be creating more jobs in Newfoundland and

Labrador than at any time in our history?

The other thing that is happening is the jobs are well paid. Mr. Speaker,

average weekly wages in this Province are for the first time in our history

higher than the Canadian average. The growth in wages is second only to Alberta

in terms of the rate of growth. So we have more people working and they are

getting paid high salaries.

Where do we see the effects of that? We see the effects of that in housing

starts. Who could believe it, after all these years of all these homes being

built, last year another record in housing starts in this Province? Last year in

this Province retail sales were very high. Last year auto sales, Mr. Speaker,

was the highest ever in Newfoundland and Labrador. It is because people have

money in their pockets and people are working.

You have the business sector booming, you have the consumer sector booming.

If more people are working and they are making more money, and more businesses

in the Province are selling more goods, selling more trucks, selling more retail

items, obviously they are making money. If they are making money they are going

to pay revenues in the form of personal income taxes and in the form of

corporate income taxes to the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. Those

parts of the economy are doing well. Money is coming into the government to

enable the government to spend money on the people of the Province on health

care and education and things that are important to the people of the Province.

Mr. Speaker, the wealthiest part of our economy is the export sector. It is

the oil and gas industry. Not that we are too reliant on oil. That is the

biggest part of the economy. We cannot do it based on wood pellets. We are going

to try, but it is oil that has been giving the wealth. It is the minerals that

have been giving the wealth because of demand coming from places like China, and

coming from places like India, and coming from places in other parts of the

world.

The demand for the product was driving up the price of the product. The price

of the product now is driving up profits being made by the business sector;

therefore, they would pay more royalties to the Government of Newfoundland and

Labrador. They would pay more taxes to the Government of Newfoundland and

Labrador and those revenues were taken to do the things that we could do; to do

things like the insulin pumps, to build new schools, to build new roads, to

build new ferries. That is where it came from, but unfortunately the economy has

changed. The world economy has changed.

There is a banking crisis in Europe. There is a housing crisis and a debt

crisis in the United States. Those economies are stagnant. As a result of that,

there is less demand coming out of Europe, less demand coming out of the US for

products in China, for products in India. Their needs and their demands for the

commodities that we provide the oil, nickel, iron ore is less demand. Less

demand for our products, lower price for our products. Lower price for our

products, less royalties come into our Treasury, less corporate taxes come into

our Treasury. It is very simple.

Some parts of our economy are going very well. There are lots of jobs being

created, lots of opportunity for the people here, but what has happened is

because of the export sector, less revenue is coming into the Province. We have

to do what anybody has to do when the revenue that they are earning drops.

Circumstances have changed. The world economy changed. Demand for our products

is lower. The price of our products is lower. Money coming into us was lower. So

we have to live within our means.

Like any family, if your revenue drops, your expenditures have to drop, like

any organization, like any business. It is no different for our government. We

are not immune to it. We are not immune to circumstances changing in the world

and we have to adapt to them. We have to live within our means, and that means

reducing our expenditures. We do not like doing it. We know the pain it causes.

When revenues are coming in and government introduces a new program, what has

to happen? What government does is provide services to its people, and to

provide services you have to hire people to provide those services. Mr. Speaker,

when the opposite happens, when revenues drop and you cannot offer all of those

services, then unfortunately people lose their jobs. That is very, very

unfortunate. We know how tough it is on those who do.

It was interesting, Mr. Speaker, as I noticed people commenting on the

Budget, a lot of people said the same thing. A lot people said: Yes, you have to

cut your spending. We know you have to eliminate that deficit. You cannot have a

deficit every year. If you are having a deficit you now have to take steps to

get rid of that deficit, which means you either reduce your spending or you

raise your taxes, or you borrow, which is madness.

Mr. Speaker, everyone said the same thing. They all said: Yes, you have to

reduce your spending, we know that, but don't cut us. Don't cut the things that

we love. That is the problem. Tough decisions have to be made. Responsible

decisions have to be made. If we do what is right now we will get our financial

system back in order, and I know there is a projection by the minister that we

will get there in a couple of years. Then we will be able to get on with

continuing to pay down debt and continue to make investments.

Mr. Speaker, there is also a difference I hear people saying: Oh, my God,

you should not spend the money. You should not have cut that; you should cut

Muskrat Falls and then you would have a surplus.

That is the dumbest thing I think anybody in this Province has ever said. We

know that the investment in Muskrat Falls does not go on the income statement as

an expense; it is an investment. It is an investment that will come back to the

people of the Province many times over. We will get our money back. Not only

will we get our money back, it will provide the people of the Province with low

energy prices, stable energy prices, which is the whole reason for the

investment.

Mr. Speaker, Muskrat Falls was not an investment to export power to the rest

of the world. Muskrat Falls is an investment for the people of this Province so

the people of this Province will have stable, steady, reliable energy for the

next fifty, sixty years, until the end of time. At least our people will be

protected in that way. That was the advantage there.

I find this absolutely amazing that people would criticize the investment

that this government is going to make to protect the workers at the pulp and

paper mill in Corner Brook, to protect the pensioners who used to work at the

pulp and paper mill in Corner Brook. We stand with those people, Mr. Speaker. We

are proud to stand with this mill no matter what is said by certain people.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. MARSHALL: Can you imagine if that mill went down? Can you imagine the

harshness and the impact that would have on those pensioners? With an unfunded

pension liability, their pensions would be reduced by 25 per cent or 30 per

cent. Can you imagine the impact, the devastation that would have on those

families?

We are standing with the paper mill because we have a belief and a

recognition that we are not talking about saving one plant. We are not talking

about saving one business. We are talking about saving a whole forestry industry

which is all interconnected, the pulp and paper mill with the integrated saw

mill operations. They are all interconnected.

The pulp and paper company, the logs that come into that company, the sawlogs

go to the sawmills where they are harvested into lumber. There is some good news

happening there; the lumber prices are up. The sawmills, of course, with their

lumber, the pulp logs, they transfer to the newsprint mill. The waste from the

sawmilling operation, the bark, the chips, and the shavings also go to the pulp

and paper company. That provides another stream of revenue for the integrated

sawmills that helps keep them operating.

I was told by my officials that if the mill went down the sawmill operators

in Central Newfoundland would go down within a month. Mr. Speaker, we are going

to stand by that industry. We are going to invest in that industry with

good-paying jobs for the people who work there. We are not going to abandon it

like others might suggest.

I am not talking about the Official Opposition when I say it. They have stood

with us, they have co-operated with us, and they will stand with us in support

for the workers and the pensioners and the people who are involved in the

forestry industry in Newfoundland. We are not going to let them down. We are

going to stand with them, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you very much.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

I recognize the Leader of the Official Opposition.

MR. BALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

This is my second time to be able to stand and speak to Budget 2013. As the

minister mentioned in his speech just a few minutes ago, I spoke at length about

ten days ago, about three hours, on the Budget Speech.

Right now, if we just go back and review the numbers that were given in this

year's Budget, the total revenue for 2013-2014 is a total of $7 billion. We are

anticipating or expecting or forecasting a $563 million deficit for this year,

with net expenses to be $7.6 billion, Mr. Speaker.

In the Budget outlook it also forecasts for 2014-2015, where revenue actually

will decrease again, which is about $6.9 billion. Then the net expenses for next

year will be about $7.6 billion, with a surplus of $650 million.

Mr. Speaker, in the third year, which is part of the Sustainability Plan that

has been mentioned by this government, in 2015-2016 it is $7.8 billion in

revenue, with net expenses of $7.6 billion, and then forecasted to return to a

surplus of $230 million.

Mr. Speaker, as we know, over the last few years, even though those forecasts

are put in place and we see a three-year forecast here, very rarely has this

government ever met any of those forecasts. Indeed, all of this has to do with

the pricing of commodities around oil primarily, but sometimes affected by

mining as well. It is very difficult, as I have said many, many times just the

way oil is priced and how it is impacted by currency, it is very difficult to

make long-term forecasts.

Mr. Speaker, I guess I want to respond to some of the comments that were made

by the minister just a few minutes ago, some comments that I made about a week

ago in this House about where there were some accusations of me saying that we

spent too much money or overspending by this government.

I will qualify that by saying there is no question that those warnings were

put out there by many people, not just me as the Leader of the Official

Opposition, there were many people in this Province. I even mentioned last week

about Scotiabank and their own economist who was used to create this year's

Budget who they brought in for a period of time to help with putting Budget 2013

in place, Dr. Wade Locke. He was actually sending warnings, as were other

economists across the country. You had people with the various editorial boards.

Many, many people had sent warnings and said that we have to get the spending

of this government under control. It was not just about the overspending; it was

about how you spent and the priority of spending. There was no point if you were

just going to go out and spend money and then the positions you create or the

services you put in place are not affordable.

The Adult Dental Program is a perfect example of that. We put that program in

place, it lasted one year, there was no planning, and the next year, what had to

happen? Well, it was ratcheted back, I say, Mr. Speaker. It is about the

priority of spending and when you make a decision to spend, is the money there

to make that program sustainable into the future? It is about creating the

long-term plan for that spending. So when we make decisions, as I say, do we

have the money there and do we know with certainty that money is available in

the long term?

Mr. Speaker, as I said, it is about the commitments that we make, if we can

afford them, and if the money is going to be in place to sustain those programs

well into the future. We found that out this year, of course, now when we have

had to really cut many of our employees in the public sector as a result of not

planning for those positions for the long term.

Mr. Speaker, I do want to address some of the comments about some of the

projects and some of the money that has been spent to create programs by this

government. There is always the accusation when you go back to past

Administrations and why things were not in place, why other people had to go and

borrow, and why there was less done. I will say, if people go back in and take a

look at the history, there are surpluses, but they were smaller surpluses, I

would add.

I can tell you, if you look at the Budgets of the past Administrations, there

was not a lot of money available. We have seen Budgets of $4 billion and less,

when you look at revenue streams now at $7 billion and more. It is quite a

difference. The environment of putting a Budget in place prior to 2003 was quite

different. It was a very different environment.

What that government did, I will say, is that they went out and negotiated

very successfully with mining companies like Vale, Inco at the time. They

successfully negotiated with and created Hibernia, and that was based on, I will

say, successive governments. Many people had their hand in that, even going back

into the 1980s, of making Hibernia the success that it is. The deals were signed

by Liberal governments. Terra Nova is another example. Terra Nova is a great

example and it is actually producing a lot of revenue for our economy today. Of

course, we also have White Rose. We have seen extensions, but without the

negotiations, without those projects put in place in the beginning from 2003 to

where we are today, we would not have the money to spend. We would still be

dealing with $4 billion budgets.

I challenge this government, how would you respond to a $4 billion budget if

you did not have those revenue lines that were negotiated by other

Administrations? Actually, that was part of the inheritance. There was no

question there was a lot of work that had to be done.

I heard a member opposite today talk about no hospitals in the Province, or

where were the hospitals? I can tell you there were lots of hospitals that were

built in this Province and a lot of schools that were built in this Province

before 2003. As a matter of fact, if you go back in history and look in history,

there was quite a bit of work that was done in this Province in the 1960s. When

you look at things like the university, when you look at vocational schools and

a lot of the other programs and buildings that were put in place, they were not

put in place by this government, Mr. Speaker. It took successive governments to

do that work.

Mr. Speaker, I want to respond for just a few minutes to the Corner Brook

Pulp and Paper situation in Corner Brook. I have to say, it was disturbing to

see in The Western Star , which is a local newspaper in Corner

Brook, this week I will read this like it is, so people understand that this

is not just Opposition out there complaining about this.

This is an interview that was done by the Minister of Health and Community

Services. "She said while some political parties criticize the province's

$90-million pledge to the paper mill and would rather see it collapse, the

government doesn't agree." Mr. Speaker, I am going to tell you, I take offence

to that. I really do, because it was not a fair statement.

The minister made it quite clear, political parties and made a deliberate

attempt, I would say, Mr. Speaker, not to tell the full story. I think people on

the West Coast, in particular the people in Corner Brook and the people in my

community of Deer Lake and people in Central Newfoundland I have spoken at

great length, and there was no question across this Province. There was a

backlash about how we should spend this $90 million. It was not, I would say if

you look at most of the polling across the Province, especially in the

environment of this latest Budget, in this 2013 Budget. A lot of people had

concerns where this money would be spent and how it would be spent.

Many people came to me in my district and said: You can't be serious, Dwight,

that you would actually support giving Corner Brook Pulp and Paper $90 million

in a loan when we are seeing public sector employees being laid off, when we are

seeing services cut across the Province.

Even on Saturday night at an event, I went through great length of explaining

to the people in that room why it is I would be comfortable with the $90 million

loan. I made it quite clear the money needed to be protected. There needed to be

a repayment provision put in place. There needed to be security put in place.

We even went out there and said security like Deer Lake Power is something

that would need to be considered. Land, for instance, in communities would be

something that needed to be considered. We are not here to say that we should be

willy-nilly, taking a $90 million cheque and just throwing it at a company like

Corner Brook Pulp and Paper. It is not a company, I say, Mr. Speaker. Indeed, it

is a forestry industry.

As the Minister of Natural Resources just clearly said, what we are doing

here, or what government wants to do here and I am not the one, as Leader of

the Opposition, who should be standing here and supporting a government

investment into the forestry industry. I can tell you right now, when I see

where there is an opportunity, when I see this government trying to do the right

thing for an industry, well, I am going to stand up and support it because that

is how I feel. I take offence to this because there was an opportunity to tell

the story like it was. We are not one of those people. If there is an

opportunity there to do something right for the forestry industry, well then we

will support it.

I will say we need to get the loan repayment conditions clarified. We need to

make sure it is secure. We need to make sure we have the proper security so that

we can take it back in case there is a default position, and we need to make

sure there is infrastructure put in place in that mill. That is an old mill.

That mill is very old and it is quite costly to operate.

It is important that if we are going to put a sustainable and a viable mill

in place, we need investment and infrastructure in that mill, I say, Mr.

Speaker. We have employees and retirees throughout this Province who contribute

a lot of money to the economy on the West Coast, and not only the West Coast.

The minister spoke earlier about car sales, for instance. Well, I can tell

you a lot of those cars are bought by retirees and employees with Corner Brook

Pulp and Paper, or Deer Lake Power, or in some of the integrated sawmills with

somebody attached to the forestry industry across this Province. They make those

purchases. They are making decisions to renovate their houses and make other

purchases, if it is recreational or otherwise. It is part of what happens.

I am not at all interested in seeing laid off workers from a mill in Corner

Brook go away or be taking a plane out of Deer lake and end up in Fort McMurray

looking for work. That is not what this is all about. We have to support

industry but we have to make sure that we protect our assets, which includes our

financial assets.

Mr. Speaker, that is why I take offence to some of the comments that have

been made here. We are indeed concerned and protecting the taxpayers' money. We

do see there is an opportunity here to make sure that industry is viable and

sustainable for the long haul, and if by chance it does not happen, the money is

protected. As a default, the security is in place. Our money is protected and we

could get assets of Corner Brook Pulp and Paper back, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, as I said, that is the position we take on Corner Brook Pulp and

Paper. It is a significant investment as I know, as you know. It is hard; it is

often difficult to explain that in the current situation. On one hand here we

have an industry that if it was to collapse, there would be well over 1,000

people who would be out of work and that industry would be gone forever, Mr.

Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, I will move on and speak to some of the other issues that I see

coming out of Budget 2013. I want to speak just for a minutes about the

so-called 10-Year Sustainability Plan that was put in place. As I read through

the 10-Year Sustainability Plan I will say when you get to 2013, you look at

putting measures in place for deficit reduction. Then you look at 2014, where we

would see a review of Memorial University, the College of the North Atlantic,

regional health authorities and the unfunded pension liabilities, and then next

year where we would return to surplus. Then in year four to ten we would see a

continued focus on innovation, economic diversification and debt reduction.

When you get past year four, this 10-Year Sustainability Plan I will say, Mr.

Speaker, really lacks detail. I know it can be very difficult sometimes to put

yourself out there four or five year's time, but when you look at year four,

that is not that far away. If we are going to be innovative and use our

creativity to bring industry to this Province, I am going to say, Mr. Speaker,

that has to happen right now. I really do not see, as I read through this

document here, as I look through this document, where there are any specific

examples of how this could happen.

I will give you an example with the College of the North Atlantic. I will go

back to an example that I have heard, I know some members of the House of

Assembly have used. This is with the electronics program at the College of the

North Atlantic. I would agree right now, that the numbers in that particular

program are down. There has been no marketing done around that program. All of

the students who come out of that program, the electronics program at the

college in Corner Brook, they all get work. They end up working with companies

like Nalcor and with NAV CANADA.

What I found alarming with all of this, what I found alarming and disturbing,

actually, is that there has never been a meeting. There was no consultation at

all with the college on how you could fix that program and on how you could get

the enrolment up to twenty students a year and have sixty students in that

class. The success is there. You have companies who actually come in and hire

those people right from their classes. As a matter of fact, I have attended

graduation ceremonies at the college when these students are not even there. Do

you know why they are not there, Mr. Speaker? They are already gone to work.

It is not only the electronics program, I say, Mr. Speaker. There were lots

of examples through the college system. I believe if we sat down, if we took the

administrators from the college and even the instructors aside and said: How can

we fix those challenges? How can we fix that? That is what the dialogue should

have been. That is what the conversation should have been, with the people who

are actually delivering those programs. It did not happen. How can you be

actually, truly innovative and creative if you refuse to talk to the people who

are engaged in the system? You cannot do it.

There has been letter after letter that has come from people around to the

Premier, I say. Members opposite are saying: Well, we are not getting those.

Well, I can assure you, and I have a file up in the office upstairs that I can

guarantee you is growing. These are just letters that are coming in. These are

not including the e-mails. There are literally thousands of e-mails that have

come in.

MR. LANE: Tens of thousands.

MR. BALL: No, I am not going to say tens of thousands, I say to the

Member for Mount Pearl South. It is not tens of thousands, because as you know

there are not tens of thousands of students in the programs. I can guarantee you

there are tens of thousands of people impacted by this.

I can give you lots of good examples of families across this Province who are

being impacted by this. I can give you examples of where mothers have gone back

to school and now they have come off social services income. Now they are out

there working. They are out there paying taxes. They are contributing, and they

are happy and proud to do so. The impact that is having on their own children, I

say, and in their own communities, Mr. Speaker; their own children right now

feel like they have been taken out of a trap and now they are ending up in

post-secondary education. There are a lot of good news stories, Mr. Speaker.

What needed to happen was there needed to be a dialogue where you would

engage those very people who were involved with the College of the North

Atlantic. Then, I believe, with that level of engagement, challenge the

instructors and challenge the people who were involved in the system. Show us.

Help us find solutions. That is what a proper review would have done. That is

how a proper review should have been done, I say, Mr. Speaker. It did not happen

in this particular case, and now what we are seeing is programs cut from the

College of the North Atlantic across this Province.

So, Mr. Speaker, another area that I spoke at great length in the last few

weeks and anybody who knows my background, I am certainly not someone that has

been involved in the education system around the Province. I am not a teacher,

not a principal, and I have not sat on a school council. I have done my

volunteer time in schools, talking to many classes, including JA, for many, many

years, and talking about business, talking about health care, and I have always

enjoyed going into classrooms.

There are a lot of members opposite, however, who have been involved in our

education system, directly involved in our education system, either by being

teachers or by being principals, or maybe even some in the administration.

Certainly, lots of people have been more directly involved with education than I

would have been. I think if you really sat down privately, in their own history,

in their past, the best decision that those educators made in their days of

working in school were made when they brought people in, when they brought

families in, when they brought students in, and what did they do? When they

brought people in and they actually sat down and they consulted with them

which brings me to, of course, school board amalgamation.

If you go back over the history of education in our Province, if you go right

back to Term 17 in 1949 as part of the Confederation with Canada. That was a put

there for a reason. Even the people of the time, when we were about to enter

Confederation, education was an extremely important element of what we would do

as a Province in Canada.

In the 1960s I was not very old then I do understand that in the 1960s

there was actually a Royal Commission put in place. There was a Royal Commission

put in place because people were feeling that we had to change our education

system. Something needed to happen. So, in the 1960s they put a Royal Commission

in place to come back with recommendations on how we should change our education

system, what the future of education should be, how would it look. Well, there

were a number of recommendations that came out of that, as you know, and from

that is where we got what has become known in our Province for many, many years,

which was a denominational school system.

For many, many years, that system worked. We had the direct involvement, of

course, of many churches around the Province. As a result of that commission in

the 1960s, we had, as I said, the interdenominational system. Lab

Document details

CollectionNewfoundland and Labrador — Debates (Hansard)
Citation2013-04-29
Typehansard
Volume / chapter2013-04-29
Languageen
Formathtm
SourcePROVINCIAL
Identifier2ede643acca2164f290fbc5fc72cb8f7e80ddeec

Source file is stored in the law ingest library (htm).