H0220pm 09

H0220pm 09

British Columbia — Debates (Hansard)

Fourth Session, 38th Parliament OFFICIAL REPORT OF DEBATES OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY (HANSARD) Wednesday, February 20, 2008 Afternoon Sitting Volume 26, Number 9 THE HONOURABLE BILL BARISOFF, SPEAKER ISSN 0709-1281

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Entered Confederation July 20, 1871) LIEUTENANT-GOVERNOR His Honour the Honourable Steven L. Point, OBC FOURTH SESSION, 38TH PARLIAMENT SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Honourable Bill Barisoff EXECUTIVE COUNCIL Premier and President of the Executive Council ............................................................................................................Hon. Gordon Campbell Minister of State for Intergovernmental Relations .......................................................................................................... Hon.

John van Dongen Deputy Premier and Minister of Education and Minister Responsible for Early Learning and Literacy...................... Hon. Shirley Bond Minister of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation ........................................................................................................ Hon. Michael de Jong Minister of Advanced Education and Minister Responsible for Research and Technology ........................................... Hon.

Murray Coell Minister of Agriculture and Lands.......................................................................................................................................................Hon. Pat Bell Attorney General and Minister Responsible for Multiculturalism............................................................................... Hon. Wally Oppal, QC Minister of Children and Family Development ................................................................................................................Hon.

Tom Christensen Minister of State for Childcare ........................................................................................................................................................Hon. Linda Reid Minister of Community Services and Minister Responsible for Seniors’ and Women’s Issues........................................... Hon. Ida Chong Minister of Economic Development and Minister Responsible for the Asia-Pacific Initiative and the Olympics.................Hon.

Colin Hansen Minister of Employment and Income Assistance ...........................................................................................................Hon. Claude Richmond Minister of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources .......................................................................................................Hon. Richard Neufeld Minister of State for Mining......................................................................................................................................................Hon.

Kevin Krueger Minister of Environment and Minister Responsible for Water Stewardship and Sustainable Communities ...............Hon. Barry Penner Minister of Finance.......................................................................................................................................................................Hon. Carole Taylor Minister of Forests and Range and Minister Responsible for Housing ............................................................................. Hon.

Rich Coleman Minister of Health ......................................................................................................................................................................Hon. George Abbott Minister of Labour and Citizens’ Services ......................................................................................................................................Hon. Olga Ilich Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General................................................................................................................................Hon.

John Les Minister of Small Business and Revenue and Minister Responsible for Regulatory Reform............................................ Hon. Rick Thorpe Minister of Tourism, Sport and the Arts ......................................................................................................................................Hon. Stan Hagen Minister of State for ActNow B.C. ............................................................................................................................................ Hon.

Gordon Hogg Minister of Transportation...........................................................................................................................................................Hon.

Kevin Falcon LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Leader of the Official Opposition .........................................................................................................................................................Carole James Deputy Speaker ....................................................................................................................................................................................Sindi Hawkins Deputy Speaker ...........................................................................................................................................................................

Katherine Whittred Assistant Deputy Speaker.....................................................................................................................................................................Sue Hammell Deputy Chair, Committee of the Whole................................................................................................................................................. Harry Bloy Clerk of the Legislative Assembly .........................................................................................................................E.

George MacMinn, OBC, QC Clerk Assistant.........................................................................................................................................................................................Robert Vaive Clerk Assistant and Law Clerk .......................................................................................................................................................Ian D. Izard, QC Clerk Assistant and Clerk of Committees ....................................................................................................................................... Craig H.

James Clerk Assistant and Committee Clerk ..........................................................................................................................................Kate Ryan-Lloyd Sergeant-at-Arms............................................................................................................................................................................. A.A.

Humphreys Director, Hansard Services ...................................................................................................................................................................Jo-Anne Kern Legislative Librarian ..................................................................................................................................................................................Jane Taylor Legislative Comptroller...............................................................................................................................................................................Dan Arbic

Party Standings: Liberal 46; New Democratic 33 ALPHABETICAL LIST OF MEMBERS Abbott, Hon. George (L) .................................................................... Shuswap Austin, Robin (NDP)............................................................................. Skeena Bains, Harry (NDP).................................................................. Surrey-Newton Barisoff, Hon. Bill (L)..........................................Penticton–Okanagan Valley Bell, Hon.

Pat (L) .............................................................Prince George North Bennett, Bill (L) ........................................................................ East Kootenay Black, Iain (L) ............................................................ Port Moody–Westwood Bloy, Harry (L)................................................................................Burquitlam Bond, Hon. Shirley (L).....................................Prince George–Mount Robson Brar, Jagrup (NDP).....................................................Surrey–Panorama Ridge Campbell, Hon.

Gordon (L) .........................................Vancouver–Point Grey Cantelon, Ron (L)..............................................................Nanaimo-Parksville Chong, Hon. Ida (L) .................................................... Oak Bay–Gordon Head Chouhan, Raj (NDP) ...........................................................Burnaby-Edmonds Christensen, Hon. Tom (L) ................................................. Okanagan-Vernon Chudnovsky, David (NDP) ......................................... Vancouver-Kensington Coell, Hon.

Murray (L) .....................................Saanich North and the Islands Coleman, Hon. Rich (L)...........................................Fort Langley–Aldergrove Conroy, Katrine (NDP) .......................................... West Kootenay–Boundary Coons, Gary (NDP) ....................................................................... North Coast Cubberley, David (NDP)............................................................Saanich South de Jong, Hon.

Michael (L) ...................................Abbotsford–Mount Lehman Dix, Adrian (NDP) .........................................................Vancouver-Kingsway Evans, Corky (NDP).................................................................Nelson-Creston Falcon, Hon. Kevin (L) .......................................................

Surrey-Cloverdale Farnworth, Mike (NDP) ...............................Port Coquitlam–Burke Mountain Fleming, Rob (NDP) ..............................................................Victoria-Hillside Fraser, Scott (NDP) ..............................................................Alberni-Qualicum Gentner, Guy (NDP).......................................................................Delta North Hagen, Hon. Stan (L) ................................................................ Comox Valley Hammell, Sue (NDP) ................................................... Surrey–Green Timbers Hansen, Hon.

Colin (L) ..................................................Vancouver-Quilchena Hawes, Randy (L).......................................................... Maple Ridge–Mission Hawkins, Sindi (L) ............................................................... Kelowna-Mission Hayer, Dave S. (L) ................................................................ Surrey-Tynehead Hogg, Hon.

Gordon (L).....................................................Surrey–White Rock Horgan, John (NDP)......................................................Malahat–Juan de Fuca Horning, Al (L)........................................................... Kelowna–Lake Country Ilich, Hon. Olga (L)...............................................................Richmond Centre James, Carole (NDP).......................................................Victoria–Beacon Hill Jarvis, Daniel (L)..................................................

North Vancouver–Seymour Karagianis, Maurine (NDP) ........................................... Esquimalt-Metchosin Krog, Leonard (NDP)......................................................................... Nanaimo Krueger, Hon. Kevin (L) .....................................Kamloops–North Thompson Kwan, Jenny Wai Ching (NDP)........................... Vancouver–Mount Pleasant Lali, Harry (NDP)........................................................................

Yale-Lillooet Lee, Richard T. (L)....................................................................Burnaby North Lekstrom, Blair (L).............................................................. Peace River South Les, Hon. John (L)............................................................... Chilliwack-Sumas Macdonald, Norm (NDP).................................... Columbia River–Revelstoke MacKay, Dennis (L)....................................................

Bulkley Valley–Stikine Mayencourt, Lorne (L).......................................................Vancouver-Burrard McIntyre, Joan (L).................................................West Vancouver–Garibaldi Neufeld, Hon. Richard (L) .................................................. Peace River North Nuraney, John (L).............................................................Burnaby-Willingdon Oppal, Hon. Wally, QC (L).......................................... Vancouver-Fraserview Penner, Hon. Barry (L)...........................................................

Chilliwack-Kent Polak, Mary (L) ....................................................................................Langley Puchmayr, Chuck (NDP)...................................................... New Westminster Ralston, Bruce (NDP) ............................................................. Surrey-Whalley Reid, Hon. Linda (L) ................................................................ Richmond East Richmond, Hon. Claude (L).............................................................

Kamloops Robertson, Gregor (NDP) ................................................Vancouver-Fairview Roddick, Valerie (L).......................................................................Delta South Routley, Doug (NDP)..................................................... Cowichan-Ladysmith Rustad, John (L) ........................................................

Prince George–Omineca Sather, Michael (NDP).........................................Maple Ridge–Pitt Meadows Simons, Nicholas (NDP) ...................................Powell River–Sunshine Coast Simpson, Bob (NDP)..................................................................Cariboo North Simpson, Shane (NDP) ....................................................Vancouver-Hastings Sultan, Ralph (L) ....................................................West Vancouver–Capilano Taylor, Hon.

Carole (L).....................................................Vancouver-Langara Thorne, Diane (NDP) .................................................Coquitlam-Maillardville Thorpe, Hon. Rick (L).......................................................Okanagan-Westside Trevena, Claire (NDP) ..................................................................North Island van Dongen, Hon. John (L)............................................ Abbotsford-Clayburn Whittred, Katherine (L)........................................

North Vancouver–Lonsdale Wyse, Charlie (NDP) .................................................................Cariboo South Yap, John (L)...................................................................Richmond-Steveston LIST OF MEMBERS BY RIDING Abbotsford-Clayburn....................................................Hon. John van Dongen Abbotsford–Mount Lehman .......................................... Hon. Michael de Jong Alberni-Qualicum..........................................................................

Scott Fraser Bulkley Valley–Stikine ...........................................................Dennis MacKay Burnaby North ...........................................................................Richard T. Lee Burnaby-Edmonds........................................................................Raj Chouhan Burnaby-Willingdon................................................................... John Nuraney Burquitlam.......................................................................................Harry Bloy Cariboo North..............................................................................

Bob Simpson Cariboo South..............................................................................Charlie Wyse Chilliwack-Kent ..................................................................Hon. Barry Penner Chilliwack-Sumas...................................................................... Hon. John Les Columbia River–Revelstoke................................................. Norm Macdonald Comox Valley........................................................................ Hon.

Stan Hagen Coquitlam-Maillardville..............................................................Diane Thorne Cowichan-Ladysmith ................................................................. Doug Routley Delta North ...................................................................................Guy Gentner Delta South ............................................................................. Valerie Roddick East Kootenay................................................................................

Bill Bennett Esquimalt-Metchosin.........................................................Maurine Karagianis Fort Langley–Aldergrove ..................................................Hon. Rich Coleman Kamloops.....................................................................Hon. Claude Richmond Kamloops–North Thompson ............................................Hon. Kevin Krueger Kelowna–Lake Country.................................................................. Al Horning Kelowna-Mission ......................................................................

Sindi Hawkins Langley ...........................................................................................Mary Polak Malahat–Juan de Fuca .................................................................. John Horgan Maple Ridge–Mission ................................................................ Randy Hawes Maple Ridge–Pitt Meadows ..................................................... Michael Sather Nanaimo......................................................................................

Leonard Krog Nanaimo-Parksville .....................................................................Ron Cantelon Nelson-Creston .............................................................................Corky Evans New Westminster .................................................................. Chuck Puchmayr North Coast....................................................................................

Gary Coons North Island ...............................................................................Claire Trevena North Vancouver–Lonsdale................................................Katherine Whittred North Vancouver–Seymour..........................................................Daniel Jarvis Oak Bay–Gordon Head ........................................................... Hon. Ida Chong Okanagan-Vernon......................................................... Hon. Tom Christensen Okanagan-Westside..............................................................Hon.

Rick Thorpe Peace River North.......................................................... Hon. Richard Neufeld Peace River South..................................................................... Blair Lekstrom Penticton–Okanagan Valley .................................................Hon. Bill Barisoff Port Coquitlam–Burke Mountain ............................................Mike Farnworth Port Moody–Westwood.................................................................... Iain Black Powell River–Sunshine Coast ...............................................

Nicholas Simons Prince George North.................................................................... Hon. Pat Bell Prince George–Mount Robson ............................................Hon. Shirley Bond Prince George–Omineca................................................................ John Rustad Richmond Centre......................................................................Hon. Olga Ilich Richmond East........................................................................Hon.

Linda Reid Richmond-Steveston...........................................................................John Yap Saanich North and the Islands ............................................ Hon. Murray Coell Saanich South ........................................................................ David Cubberley Shuswap............................................................................Hon. George Abbott Skeena.......................................................................................... Robin Austin Surrey-Cloverdale............................................................... Hon.

Kevin Falcon Surrey–Green Timbers ................................................................Sue Hammell Surrey-Newton............................................................................... Harry Bains Surrey–Panorama Ridge.................................................................Jagrup Brar Surrey-Tynehead ....................................................................... Dave S. Hayer Surrey-Whalley...........................................................................Bruce Ralston Surrey–White Rock ............................................................Hon.

Gordon Hogg Vancouver-Burrard..............................................................Lorne Mayencourt Vancouver-Fairview.............................................................Gregor Robertson Vancouver-Fraserview .................................................Hon.

Wally Oppal, QC Vancouver-Hastings .................................................................Shane Simpson Vancouver-Kensington.......................................................David Chudnovsky Vancouver-Kingsway ......................................................................Adrian Dix Vancouver-Langara ........................................................... Hon. Carole Taylor Vancouver–Mount Pleasant........................................ Jenny Wai Ching Kwan Vancouver–Point Grey ................................................Hon.

Gordon Campbell Vancouver-Quilchena.........................................................Hon. Colin Hansen Victoria–Beacon Hill...................................................................

Carole James Victoria-Hillside ...........................................................................Rob Fleming West Kootenay–Boundary........................................................Katrine Conroy West Vancouver–Capilano...........................................................Ralph Sultan West Vancouver–Garibaldi ........................................................Joan McIntyre Yale-Lillooet..................................................................................... Harry Lali

CONTENTS Wednesday, February 20, 2008 Afternoon Sitting Routine Proceedings Page Introductions by Members ....................................................................................................... .............................................. 9805 Statements (Standing Order 25 B) .............................................................................................................................. ............. 9805 Roderick Haig-Brown C. Trevena Cell phone use by drivers J. Rustad 100th anniversary of Britannia Secondary School S. Simpson Nanaimo Sports Achievement Awards R.

Cantelon Sidney and Spencer Needham J. Horgan Scouts Canada H. Bloy Oral Questions................................................................................................................. ......................................................... 9807 Status of seniors care facilities C. James Hon. G. Abbott G. Gentner A. Dix Child poverty in B.C. B. Ralston Hon. C. Richmond N. Simons J. Kwan Budget Debate (continued)............................................................................................................................... ........................ 9812 B. Ralston J. Yap N. Simons Hon.

R. Coleman R. Fleming Hon. C. Hansen B. Simpson J. Rustad

9805 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 The House met at 1:34 p.m. [Mr. Speaker in the chair.] Prayers. Introductions by Members Hon. M. de Jong: Last week we had a general intro- duction of the group of interns, and we welcomed them to the precincts. Their duties have now been assigned, and I'm pleased to introduce to the House the corps of interns who will be working with the government caucus. They are Gordon Hunter, Rhea Laube, Grace Lore, Madeleine Lyons and Danica Wong. I hope the House will make them, specifically, feel welcome as they take up their new duties with the government caucus.

Also joining the House in the gallery today is an individual who has demonstrated tremendous leader- ship on behalf of the Haisla First Nation. He has brought vision and courage to his du ties as the elected Chief. Chief Steve Wilson of the Haisla First Nation is in the gallery, and I hope all members will make him feel particularly welcome. [1335] D. Routley: I'd like to inform the members of a great experience that I've had over the last couple of days in having a young high school student do a job shadow with me. I maintain the pretence that I'm actually working fairly well so far, I think.

With the help of other people in the House, including yourself, Mr. Speaker, it was very informative for Pedro and me to meet with you and hear about your impres- sions of this place. Also, Mr. MacMinn took time to meet with us. Pedro has learned a lot about the way democracy works in theory and also now in practice. I'd like all the members to help me welcome Pedro Banman, who is my job shadow. I'd like to encourage all the members to do the same, because I think it's very good for young people in this province to see how this great system does work. R. Sultan: C'est avec grand plaisir que je vous présente Mme.

Nathalie Lleres et 55 grade 11 students from the French immersion program at École secondaire Sentinel in West Vancouver. École secondaire Sentinel currently enrols over 1,090 students in grades 8 through 12. Peut la Maison les faire accueillir. N. Simons: It gives me pleasure to introduce two friends in the House today. Would the House please make welcome Dan Bouman of the Sunshine Coast Conservation Association and Alison Leduc. Hon. W. Oppal: Watching from her hospital bed is the Deputy Speaker and member for Kelowna-Mission. She tells me she misses us. Let's give her a great round of applause. B.

Bennett: I want to call the House's attention to an accomplishment by four men from the East Kootenay last weekend. They won the senior men's curling championship for Br itish Columbia. They beat the great curler from Kelown a; Rick Folk, I think his name is. He has won several championships. Ralph Will was the skip. He curls in Sparwood. There were curlers from Fernie on the team and my buddy Gerry Kent from Cranbrook. Congratulations to them. Now they're going to the nationals in Saskatchewan. J.

McIntyre: I just wanted to add a word of welcome to the Sentinel students, although I cannot do it as elo- quently as my colleague from West Vancouver–Capilano. My son was a graduate from Sentinel in 2004. Welcome to all the Sentinel students and staff. B. Lekstrom: It's my privilege today to rise and introduce a good friend of mine in the Legislative Assembly, a former member of this House from the northwest part of our province. Would the House please welcome Mr. Roger Harris. Statements (Standing Order 25

B) RODERICK HAIG-BROWN C. Trevena: The Campbell River is a beautiful stretch o f w a t e r . I t r i p s a l o n g i t s w i d e b e d , a n d i t ' s a h o p e f o r the symbol of B.C. — salmon — and a home for an ecosystem. This was recognized by Roderick Haig-Brown, Campbell River's and perhaps B.C.'s most famous fly- fisher, a staunch environmen talist and a writer. From his home on the river's edge he could watch the river m o v e a s h e w r o t e . I t w a s i n h i s m i n d ' s e y e t h a t h e fought his environmental battles.

His legacy has lived on through his writings, and he has influenced many people, including, among others, biologists, psychologists and many who were just inter- ested in the relationship between people and nature. This year seems to be a time of legacy. For Campbell River it is a time to acknowledge the Haig-Brown lega- cies.

Tomorrow marks the 100th anniversary of the birth of Roderick, a day which will be noted with cele- bration both here in Victoria and in Campbell River. [1340] The city of Campbell River is holding a special ceremony at the museum, which itself is marking its 50th anniversary, at which February 21 will be proclaimed Roderick Haig-Brown Day. The province has also recommended this extraordi- nary man with a proclamation celebrating his lifetime achievements. It's the start of six months of events or- ganized in conjunction with the Haig-Brown Institute to mark the centenary of his and his wife Ann's birth.

The institute's mission st atement is to promote the links between ecology and economy through water- shed management and to inspire a conservation ethic through education and literature, a noble cause which

9806 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES W EDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 will be highlighted through the coming months. Events include a symposium this summer on how communi- ties can act to sustain wild salmon populations. The celebrations will culminate in the annual Haig-Brown festival, held in September at Roderick and Ann's for- mer home on the banks of the Campbell River. I hope the House will join me and the people of Campbell River in recognizing the influence of Roderick Haig-Brown and will use this year to help raise awareness of his values and his vision. CELL PHONE USE BY DRIVERS J.

Rustad: Drivers everywhere in B.C. have a lot on their minds. They're worried about making it to their destination on time. They'r e thinking about what hap- pened last night. They may even be thinking about the Canucks winning the Stanley Cup. Okay, maybe that's a bit of a stretch. The point is that drivers don't always have their minds on the road. Distractions for drivers account for almost 80 percent of crashes and 65 percent of near- crashes, according to a recent study. Statistically, young drivers have the greatest prob- lem with distractions.

Focus groups suggest that teen participants do not always see the relationship between the numerous distractions in their cars and the high rate of crashes. They do not seem to connect the many close calls that they've had to using their cell phones while driving. This is not just a problem for young drivers, but it's a safety issue for everyone on the road. According to a recent poll, 89 percent of motorists are very concerned about other distracted drivers on the road. Speaking from personal experience, there's no question that using a cell phone while driving is a sig- nificant distraction.

I'm fortunate in that I've learned that lesson without being in an accident. It's difficult to encourage everyone to have the same level of awareness regarding the distraction caused by cell phones, but perhaps ther e's something we can do for our young drivers. As new drivers go through the graduated licence program, our hope is to try to instil the best driving habits possible. I believe the dangers of distractions due to cell phones while driving should be highlighted.

I applaud the Solicitor General's review that is being initiated regarding cell phone use while driving, and I look forward to hearing the results. Together we need to find ways to raise the level of awareness and to help our new drivers form the best driving habits possible. 100th ANNIVERSARY OF BRITANNIA SECONDARY SCHOOL S. Simpson: I'm very pleased to speak today about my old high school, Britannia Secondary in East Van- couver, which is celebrating its 100th anniversary this year.

On February 6, I had the opportunity — along with the member for Burnaby North, who was also a Britannia student — to participate in the ribbon-cutting commencing the 100-day countdown to the May 16 weekend when 4,000 to 5,000 past students, teachers, administrators and friends will converge on the Agro- dome in Vancouver to celebrate this remarkable school. Britannia was the second high school built in Van- couver and is the oldest sti ll standing. It has played an integral role in East Vancouver, successfully blending a very diverse multicultural student population of work- ing-class British Columbians.

Britannia has turned out many outstanding citizens: Barbara Howard, who competed in the 1938 British Empire Games and was one of Canada's first black ath- letes; well-known entertainer and comedian Bill Reiter; Supreme Court Justice Frank Iacobucci; and of course past Premier Dave Barrett, just to name a few. Britannia has long been known for its commitment to the community. This wa s highlighted in 1972 when an elementary school and the comprehensive commu- nity services centre were added to the high school in an integrated approach to meeting the needs of the people of East Vancouver.

The Britannia Community Services Centre is argua- bly the most successful initia tive of its kind anywhere and has drawn people from around the world to come and learn about how it was done and the success it has had. Most importantly, talk to the thousands of people who use it every year, and you will be left with no doubt about the importance of its role to the community. [1345] I'm very proud of my days at Britannia, and I credit the school for giving me the foundation to be successful in my life. I'm honoured today to represent many of the children of Britannia and their families.

I know I'm joined by the member for Vancouver–Mount Pleasant, whose constituency the school is actually located in, in congratulating everyone at Britannia and all the people working on the 100th anniversary celebration. It's a great school and deserves a fabulous 100th birthday. Go, Bruins, go. Interjections. Mr. Speaker: Could I remind members to keep the chatter down just a little bit because it's hard to hear. NANAIMO SPORTS ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS R. Cantelon: Today I want to recount a very special happening at the Pacific sports achievement awards that occurred recently in Nana imo.

Among the highlights were recognition of the Nanaimo Clippers as British Columbia champions in junior B hockey and of course the Dover Bay boys basketball team winning the B.C. championship — a triple-A basketball team. Also, Michelle Stillwell as athlete of the year, a Paralympian who has won gold medals and plans to do it again, and Jim Rayhear, a Dover Bay athlete who excels in badminton and in basketball. The special moment came when they came to award the partnership team. Megan Yim and Kylee Abrahamsom were nominated for their bronze medal win in badminton, but also nominated was team

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES 9807 Plasteras. Jim Plasteras had pushed his 19-year-old daughter Carly to a finish in the Vancouver marathon. That was in May, and then he decided in October to repeat it with Carly's twin sister Angela, who is also a cerebral palsy victim. But because he tore a muscle, he didn't manage to finish the race without the help of Angela and Carly's brother and sister, who finished the race in over four hours. It was a really heroic moment. It was a hushed audience when it came time to present the award. The award was presented to Megan Yim.

It was a quiet, hushed moment, and then a very, very special thing happened. Yim walked up, received the award, turned to the crow d and said: "I don't really deserve this." She walked over and handed it to the Plasteras family. We were all just stunned for a moment. It was a moment of pure and simple graciousness that cap- tured us all in one magic moment. I salute all these champi ons and particularly Megan Yim for her graciousness, and I invite all the House to join me in that. SIDNEY AND SPENCER NEEDHAM J.

Horgan: Last year I had the pleasure to rise in this House and talk about th e athletic achievements of members of my community. But the West Shore is not just about hockey; it's also about the arts. Today I want to take the opportunity to advise the Legislature about a special musical family in my constituency. The story of Sidney and Spencer Needham starts with the awesome ensemble, the District of Soul. You don't have to go to Memphis or Motown to get a blast of the blues. Just roll into the Luxton Fall Fair or visit Jazz in the Park, and listen to the sweet sounds of soul right here in Malahat–Juan de Fuca.

The brainchild of Dunsmu ir Middle School teacher Glenn Whitney, the District of Soul was formed in 2004 with 18 very talented students from Dunsmuir and Belmont Secondary. Glen saw the talent of these kids and turned to his teaching colleagues at Belmont, Glynis Dawson and the legendary Joyce Kopan, and he kept the melodies moving. A wicked horn

section and a rhythm duo to set the tempo, the District of Soul has gained a following across the region and is a show not to be missed. As awesome as the trumpets and the saxophones are, it's the power and clarity of the main vocalists that steal the show. That is where my longtime neighbours the Needhams take the troupe to another level. Sidney, 18, and Spencer, 16, are accomplished soloists and recently put their talents up against 14 other con- testants in the third annual PEERS charity fundraising performance of Victoria Idol .

The packed house heard some incredible performances, but it was Spencer, the scrawny little brother, that won the day, and Sidney placed second runner-up. The scholarships are piling up, the studio time is being put to good use, and the recording contracts are sure to follow. It is success stories like the Needhams' that high- light the importance of the arts in our public school system. It reinforces the enormous value of music educators in our schools and the need to support the arts whenever and wherever we can.

Will the Legislature please join me in celebrating the contribution of our music teachers and two won- derful kids with a mountain of Metchosin talent, a brother-and-sister combo that are going places — Sidney and Spencer Needham. [1350] SCOUTS CANADA H. Bloy: It's my pleasure to rise and speak to a global movement of 28 million young people around the world, which started over a hundred years ago. The movement I'm talking about is scouting. I am proud to wear this uniform, just like the 24,000 other adult volunteers across Canada and hundreds of thousands of volunteers all over the world.

They volun- teer their time and effort to lead young people through a variety of activities, from camping and earning badges to meeting new friends and completing good turns in the community. Generations of children have benefited from scout- ing and its leaders. These ch ildren are taught positive values that help them be come better individuals who can play a constructive role in society.

Two leading individuals who have benefited from scouting in my community are Warren Gill, vice-president of Simon Fraser University, and David Podmore, presi- dent of Concert Properties — and other active volunteers like John Chow, Dick Earthy, Celinda Williams, Lynn Holden and Mark Robertson, who continue today to make a difference in the lives of children. F e b r u a r y 2 2 i s T h i n k i n g D a y . T h i s i s a d a y w h e r e scouting and its sister organization Guides recognize the life and importance of Lord and Lady Baden-Powell, who were the founders of scouting and guiding.

As we are three days away from Thinking Day, I urge all members of scouting and guiding and members of this House to think and to thank their leaders who volunteer in their community. Please join me in thanking our scouting and guiding volunteers. Oral Questions STATUS OF SENIORS CARE FACILITIES C. James: Yesterday the B.C. Liberals delivered a budget that completely ignored seniors and their health care challenges. On the same day, the opposition received an FOI package that once again highlighted this gov- ernment's absolute failure to protect seniors.

This pack- age contains assessment reports for seniors homes and community living homes across Vancouver Island. The reports are damning. As suspected, Beacon Hill Villa was just the tip of the iceberg. Dozens of homes across this region have been deemed high-risk. These reports are from 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007. My question is to the Minister of Health. Why is he standing by doing absolutely nothing, allowing these

9808 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES W EDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 high-risk facilities to continue to operate and not telling seniors and their families that they're at risk? Hon. G. Abbott: First of all, the Leader of the Oppo- sition is dead wrong in relation to yesterday's budget. It contained great news for seniors in this province. We are a government that has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in new facilities, residential care and assisted living for seniors across this province — now close to 4,000 incremental units across this province.

We have moved away from the substandard facilities, even places like James Bay Care Centre. We've moved away from those multi-bed wards. We've moved away from those narrow hallways, those washrooms that were inaccessible to wheelchairs. We have invested hundreds of millions of dollars in improving the lives of seniors in this province. We have, through the heal th authorities, an excel- lent system of ensuring that quality of care is there for all seniors in the province. The licensing officials at Vancouver Island and elsewhere work tirelessly to ensure that seniors get that kind of quality care. Mr.

Speaker: The Leader of the Opposition has a supplemental. Interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. C. James: There's only one part that the Health Minister said that was accurate. That is that licensing officers work hard. We have lists of dozens and dozens of facilities deemed high-risk, and I'd like the minister to tell those families that everything is fine for seniors in British Columbia. [1355] It was the NDP who actual ly blew the whistle on the deplorable conditions at Beacon Hill Villa, a facility that is right behind the Legislature. It was the NDP who actually forced this go vernment to take action.

The minister tried to keep those reports in the dark. The Premier actually said that everything was all right for seniors in British Columbia. Well, we know from these reports through FO I that Beacon Hill Villa is not the only one. Eagle Rock Heights: high risk, 2007. Shelmarie Rest Home: high risk, 2005 and 2007. Sunset Lodge: high risk, 2005 and 2007. Sunrise of Vic- toria: high risk, 2005, 2006 and 2007. The list is too long to read. Again, I say to the Minister of Health: why does it take the opposition actually getting an FOI and blowing the whistle to protect seniors from abuse from this government? Hon.

G. Abbott: What I saw last fall were the licensing officials at Vancouver Island Health Author- ity working tirelessly to ensure that every one of the patients, every one of the residents in residential care facilities, got the best quality that they could. What I saw last fall was a desperate opposition attempting to capitalize on what was good and appropriate work being done. Before this opposition leader gets too carried away with her talk about high risk, she should understand that high risk is a designation that is put on new facilities before they have the experience base to assign a permanent rating.

So it may be entirely u n r e f l e c t i v e o f t h e q u a l i t y o f c a r e t h a t i s b e i n g p r o - vided in a facility. She should watch her rhetoric, Mr. Speaker. We saw too many examples last fall of this opposition getting carried away with their rhetoric in this area. Mr. Speaker: The Leader of the Opposition has a further supplemental. C. James: I can tell the Minister of Health that what he saw last fall was the opposition standing up for seniors, and we're going to continue to do that, because the government sure isn't doing it. Excuse after excuse from this government.

All we've seen is the government trying to bury the information, trying to keep these repo rts hidden from seniors and their families. Well, residents and their families deserve better. They deserve to know the information about facilities that they're in. So will the Minister of Health say today a simple yes or no? Will he adopt the opposition's proposal and make these assessment reports public so that seniors and their families can truly know the state of care under his government? Hon. G. Abbott: I believe we have excellent resi- dential care facilities in this province.

I believe we have licensing officials at all the health authorities who work tirelessly to ensure that residents get the quality of care that they deserve. I want to again advise the Leader of the Opposition that risk assessments are based on low, medium and high risk. High risk can often be a default for a facility that has not yet opened or has been opened very briefly and has not yet established a basis on which to make that assessment. Further, I think that if there is a part… Interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. Hon. G.

Abbott: …of the opposition leader's question that I can agree with, it is that we need to have a better system of understanding risk in residential care facili- ties, particularly when you have high risk associated with a facility that's not yet opened or has very brief risk experience. I think we can improve on that. [1400] G. Gentner: The minister talks about the rhetoric. He doesn't quite understand the meaning of high risk versus moderate risk. He ma kes lots of accolades and applauds relative — and we agree with that — to the

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES 9809 licensing officials and the in spectors. But the minister has a propensity here to always shoot the messenger. The opposition has assessment reports from VIHA from 2004 to 2007. Almost all of them say the same thing. Management lacks skills, chronic understaffing, no training. Patients are being put at risk. Even facili- ties that got the worst possible score were allowed to continue to operate. These are the worst of the worst. These are the repeat offenders. The minister only inter- vened at Beacon Hill Villa after the opposition blew the whistle.

Can the Minister of Heal th explain why he did not step in every other time, especially when facilities got the worst score possible, putting seniors at the highest risk? Hon. G. Abbott: I think it's an interesting commentary, hearing these questions from the opposition the day after a budget speech in the province of British Columbia, given that this information has been publicly available since October. It was published in newspapers in south- ern Vancouver Island in October. It's very interesting…. Interjections. Mr. Speaker: Minister, take your seat. Interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. Continue, Minister.

Hon. G. Abbott: I think that maybe what they don't want to discuss is the fact that unlike the $8.2 billion health care budget that we inherited in 2001, that budget today, after the budget speech yesterday by the Finance Minister, is $15.4 billion for health care. There are hun- dreds of millions of dollar s more for residential care and assisted living, hundreds of millions of dollars for home care — right across the continuum. This is a government that's very proud of its record. We are improving on the sorry state of affairs that we inherited from that former government. Mr.

Speaker: The member has a supplemental. G. Gentner: The minister likes to do his Liberal math and throw out the numbers. In the Greater Victoria area alone… Interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. G. Gentner: …between 2004 and 2007, the high- hazard ratings were measured from 11 facilities in 2004 to 18 facilities in 2007. That is a 64 percent increase in high-hazard ratings in the Greater Victoria area. Again, a question that wasn't answered. Will he commit today to let seniors and their families know when they are in a high-r isk facility and one that doesn't even have its licensing in order? Hon. G.

Abbott: There is one charge the member made that I'm going to plead guilty to, and that's to using Liberal math, because the last thing in the world I'd ever want to use is NDP math. Interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. Continue, Minister. Hon. G. Abbott: In NDP math these things just never added up, nor could people ever figure it out. It used to be well into the year before anybody under- stood anything of what was being done by that former NDP government. To be clear, again, around the point. The risk rat- ing…. Interjections. Mr. Speaker: Continue, Minister. Interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members.

Take your seat, Minister. Interjections. Mr. Speaker: Let's listen to the question and listen to the answer. Continue, Minister. [1405] Hon. G. Abbott: The risk rating is routine informa- tion. It is readily available to members of the public on request. The risk rating is based on licensing officers' assessments, number of reportable incidents, inspec- tion history, management issues, staff qualifications and supervision, self-monitoring and physical nature of the building facility itself. The licensing officers undertake these reviews regu- larly.

They're available in the case of the reviews that the members are raising. It's been available since October. The licensing officers do a great job, and we have a great residential care system in this province. A. Dix: Well, hon. Speaker, the government did have a message for seniors in this budget. It was: "Fend for yourselves." The minister brags that his long-term care promise is still unkept. They got cu ts to Pharmacare. They got no improvements in care standards — a big fat nothing except maybe, just maybe, George W.

Bush–style medi- cal savings accounts and the continuing assertion that seniors are to blame for his government's health care failures. My question is pretty simp le to him. Si nce he's not going to do anything about the seniors health crisis in this province — since he's not going to do anything — why shouldn't seniors who live in a care home have the

9810 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES W EDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 same access to information about risks in their care home that he has access to every single day? Hon. G. Abbott: The real crisis in this province is the crisis of credibility which that NDP opposition suffers. We've heard the Leader of the Opposition, the opposition Health critic and other members throw around charges about high-r isk ratings and what that means.

Let me quote here: "Ayr Bethel Centre, Sunrise of Saanich, Eagle Rock Terrace and Island View at Marty Lane, Selkirk and Sluggett have applied for a licence but have not been issued a licence." The risk categorization of facilities that have applied for a licence is a default rating assigned by the computer program. This is an opposition that never hesitates to make charges which undermine public confidence in what is a wonderful residential care system in the province of British Columbia. Interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. The member has a supplemental. A.

Dix: Well, you know, the minister talks loudly and often and incessantly, but it's pretty clear he carries no stick at all. He can't even tell us today the budget for VIHA. He can't even tell us today the budget for the Fraser Health Authority. It's half the budget of his ministry. He can't even tell us. Why doesn't he table that information in the House today? Or is that too much for us to be able to under- stand? Interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. A. Dix: Dozens of care homes at risk, and the minis- ter shrugs and laughs. Not enough staff, not enough training — a proud Bill 29 legacy.

Oh yeah, $220 million for the banks, no problem. How many more seniors are going to be put at risk until this government takes action to protect seniors who need the care in long-term care centres? Hon. G. Abbott: I'm glad the minister — or the member — raised the point…. Interjections. Hon. G. Abbott: He won't be a future minister. That's guaranteed; I agree. I'd have to agree with the opposition on that point. This NDP government in the 1990s routinely…. Interjections. Hon. G. Abbott: I know they don't like to hear this.

I know they hate hearing about this, but too bad. [1410] In the 1990s health authorit ies, all 52 of them, used to hear about their budgets in August. Four months into the fiscal year, the 52 NDP health authorities would start to hear about their budgets. So I'm not go- ing to listen to a lecture from the former chief adviser to the NDP government around that point. It's a whole lot of nonsense. Similarly, we've built almost 4,000. They didn't build a thousand in ten years of residential care and assisted living in this province. CHILD POVERTY IN B.C. B.

Ralston: I want to talk about a record that I'm sure the government is less proud of. For the fourth year in a row, British Columbia has the worst child poverty record in the country. Other Premiers — Premier Danny Williams of Newfoundland, Premier Jean Charest of Quebec — have developed long-term poverty reduction strategies. B.C. refuses to take a leadership role. Yesterday's budget offers nothing to combat child poverty. My question is to the De puty Premier. Why, after four years of the worst child poverty record in the country, has her government failed to take leadership on this vital file? Hon. C.

Richmond: The opposition is very eager… Interjection. Mr. Speaker: Members. Hon. C. Richmond: …to quote statistics from advo- cacy groups. Advocacy groups are well meaning, and they're sincere people, but they take a very narrow view of child poverty, of welfare and of the things that a government is doing. First of all, their data is from 2005. Secondly, they don't take into account what has happened in the last two or three years. For exampl e, last year we increased the welfare rates for the first time in ten years so that we are now amongst the two or three highest provinces in Canada.

We have no income tax for anyone earning under $15,000. The rent supplement was for anyone earning $28,000 or less. Yesterday in the budget it went to $35,000. The day care subsidy is for anyone earning under $38,000 a year. I could go on, but I'll wait for the supplemental. B. Ralston: Well, the minister likes to disparage advocacy groups. Let's try the Premier's own Progress Board, where they have said that there's a persistent failure in improving the social condition of the people that live at the economic marg ins of our society. That's the Premier's own Progress Board. How about the Premier of Ontario?

Here's what he had to say, not an advocacy group: "It's no longer just a moral imperative to ensure that the poor find opportunity and grow strong. It's become an economic necessity." That's the Premie r of Ontario taking a lead- ership position.

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES 9811 My question is to the Depu ty Premier. In the face of soaring child poverty in British Columbia, when is her government going to take a leadership position and serve and help the children of this province properly? Hon. C. Richmond: For the member's information, the rate of child poverty has gone steadily downward in the last three years. We have taken 112,000 people off the welfare rolls and put them back to work , and they're now averaging $13 an hour. Just a few short years ago in 2001, one in seven children was in fam ilies on income assistance.

It's now one in 30. Let me just give you one final quote from the C.D. Howe Institute, which says…. Interjections. Hon. C. Richmond: Oh, an advocacy group. They said: "Work, not welfare, eliminates poverty." [1415] N. Simons: Today we received a report. The Pivot Legal Society has once again pointed to a terrible prob- lem of child poverty in the province. It's entitled Broken Promises. Yesterday we saw that promise broken again, and that was to look after th e children of this province. One in four in this province lives in poverty, and that's just shameful.

I'd like to know what this minister is going to do to address what we know to be the underlying causes of children and families coming into contact with the child welfare system, and that is poverty. What is this government going to do to address that important is- sue, which most British Columbians recognize is a problem, but somehow 46 people on the other side of the House don't? Hon. C. Richmond: W e t a k e a n y r e p o r t o n c h i l d poverty very seriously, and we certainly don't dismiss it lightly. Since 2005 the children li ving in low-income situa- tions…. It's falling rapidly.

It fell by 15 percent since 2005. It's gone down 15 percent. That is 24,000 children who are n o w b e t t e r o f f , a n d w e e x p e c t n e w d a t a t o c o n f i r m t h e trend to fewer families in lower-income situations. Another fact is that the poverty rate for single moms has fallen from 52.7 percent to 29 percent in the last five years. The median income for single moms has risen from $21,900 to $30,400, and the increase has been almost entirely from higher market earnings rather than social payments. Mr. Speaker: Member has a supplemental. N.

Simons: What is shameful about that response is the fact that he is not denying the fact that we lead the country in child poverty, and he continues to quote statistics to maybe try and shape it to meet his particu- lar needs. The fact remains that we lead the country in child poverty. That's a record that the other side of the House — the government — needs to take into account. My question: when will this government fulfil the promise it made to children, which it has broken repeatedly, to look after families who are living in poverty? When will it have a strategy? Hon. C.

Richmond: Well, I don't think the member has been paying much attention over the last few years to the policies we've introduced for people at the low end of the income scale. Back just ten years ago there were 375,000 British Columbians on welfare in this province — 375,000. An Hon. Member: One child in seven then, guys. Hon. C. Richmond: That's right. Interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. Hon. C. Richmond: O n e f a m i l y i n t e n w a s o n welfare ten years ago.

I do believe that the statistics quoted are not only out of date but that they are sus- pect, because the poverty rate has dropped tremen- dously in just the last two years. We think that any child living in poverty…. Even one is one too many, but we are working dili- gently with our programs to bring that number down. J. Kwan: Maybe the minister should read the gov- ernment's own Progress Board report. Clearly, he doesn't know what the heck he's talking about. B.C. has the worst child poverty rate since this government took office in 2002. And let's be clear.

The rate of child poverty has remained the highest in the country since 2002, and the majority of the poor children in B.C. actually live with families who are working — from a government who refuses to increase minimum wages. [1420] The Pivot Legal Society report states: "The govern- ment's lack of commitment to providing publicly funded services has severely undermined the ability of the Ministry of Children and Family Development to take a preventative approach to child protection is- sues." The report lists poverty as one of the examples of the government's lack of commitment.

Yesterday the Minister of Finance tabled a budget that gave banks $220 million in tax breaks and $327 million to oil and gas companies in subsidies. My question is to the Minister of Children and Family Development. Is the minister satisfied that one in four children in the province of British Columbia lives in poverty, or will he stand up and call on his government to redirect those dollars to people in great- est need — children living in poverty? Interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. Members.

9812 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES W EDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 Hon. C. Richmond: The opposition doesn't seem to want to pay attention to statistics like this. The employment growth for single parents has increased dramatically over the last seven years. The employ- ment rate for single parents with young children increased from 37 percent in 2000… Interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. Hon. C. Richmond: …to 60 percent in 2006.

We expect that this strong employment growth since 2002, which has led to the lowest unemployment rates in over 30 years, will further reduce low-income rates and improve B.C.'s ranking with other provinces. [End of question period.] Introductions by Members C. Trevena: I'd like to introduce 23 students from Zeballos Elementary-Secondary School, from grades 8 to 12, who are in the gallery today. I've spoken to the House about the Zeballos Elementary-Secondary School in the past, and I'm very pleased that the students are here today. I hope the House can make them very welcome. Orders of the Day Hon.

M. de Jong: I call continued debate on the budget. Budget Debate (continued) B. Ralston: I rise to continue my response to the budget speech that the Finance Minister gave yester- day. I want to begin by talk ing a little bit about global economic conditions as they pertain to the British Columbia economy. I think what we've seen, certainly since the new year, is a shift in mood and thinking about the economy not only in the United States but here in Canada as well.

The gathering effects of the credit crisis and related housing crisis, the sub-prime mortgage problems in the United States have led many economists to begin rethinking their growth estimates for the United States and, by implication, for Canada in the year to come. [1425] [S. Hammell in the chair.] At the Davos meeting of the World Economic Fo- rum that was held in January just several weeks ago, which is a gathering place for economic and political leaders from around the worl d, that was the subject of some keen discussion.

A panel of economists at the World Economic Forum was of the view that the U.S. economy might be — it's certainly one view — set for a long recession. The U.S. mortgage crisis has pushed consumer and company loan s, and will spread to those. It's clear that the monoline insurers are now experienc- ing some difficulty because of their very close relationship to numerous banking products. There's an expectation that that will push up defaults sharply. Mr.

Roubini, who is a New York University economist, was one of the few economists to correctly predict a slump in the U.S. housing market and subsequent crunch in the credit markets a year ago. He's of the view that after five years of strong global economic growth, of which obviously British Columbia has been the beneficiary, it's now only a question of how hard the landing of the U.S. economy would be — said Mr. Roubini, chair of Roubini Global Economics. He expects that the Federal Reserve — and I think that's widely speculated upon — will continue to reduce interest rates.

But that may not be enough to provide the necessary stimulus to restart the economy. Mr. Roubini was also backed by Stephen Roach, who's the chair of Morgan Stanley Asia and well known for his economic opinions in the public arena. He criti- cized the Federal Reserve an d the U.S. government for trying to solve the current cr isis by reaching back into the same playbook that created the mess in the first place. Instead of tackling a sset bubbles like inflated housing and stock markets head on, they waited until the bubble had burst and then cleaned up afterwards.

So when we set our economy here in British Columbia — our relatively small, subnational economy in the global context — it does appear that economic growth revisions are prudently revised downwards. Indeed, that was the view of some of the well-known British Columbia commentators on the economy. I'm thinking in particular of Jock Finlayson, employed by the employers council of British Columbia, who has offered his views in several recent lectures — one on November 20 here in Victoria and another one just recently in Vancouver in February.

What's noticeable — and what he says — is that there is a shift in emphasis towards a slightly more pessimistic tone, even between November and February. I don't propose to review everything that he said, but I think it is significant to have a look at what a well-respected commentator on the British Columbia economy has to say, as we contemplate the conditions that the budget seeks to address and how British Columbians can expect to respond over the year and into the future.

What one would expect during a period of economic growth is that the government would lay the basis for future prosperity using the financial resources made available to it during good times. As Mr. Roubini has said, it's been global growth pretty well around the world over the last five years. So when British Columbia is the beneficiary of that and has participated in that global growth…. But as things shift downwards, the degree to which the government will be tested is the degree to which the government has prepared for the inevitable down- turn and built upon the na tural and human assets of

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES 9813 the province, in order to provide some protection from that downturn. [1430] What Mr. Finlayson says is that of the top ten B.C. growth industries in 2003 to 2006, seven of those ten industries are construction or construction-related. I don't think anyone will be surprised by that. Certainly, there is a cons truction boom. It's related to the Olympics. But construc tion booms, as anyone in the construction business will t e l l y o u , e b b a n d f l o w .

There will certainly be a do wnturn in the construction industry at some point, and that point is probably coming sooner rather than later. He looks to what are other medium- and long-term constraints on economic growth, and we have to look at some of those. I don't thin k, again, that this is the chronic condition of British Columbia. A small, heavily resource-dependent export sector with a large and growing trade deficit will limit future gains in prosperity. He speaks of the impact of the pine beetle and a poor productivity record.

Producti vity is not simply labour productivity or inviting people to work longer hours but the complex quotient of productivity that involves the contributions of capital, labour, natural resources and regulatory reform. He also describes as a medium- and long-term con- straint on economic growth "the winding down of the construction boom and post-Olympics 'hangover.'" He has "hangover" in quotation marks. So there is an expectation out there, given by a very informed com- mentator on the B.C. economy, that there will be a winding down of the construction boom, and there will be a post-Olympic hangover.

He also stresses that the tr aditional export industries of the province are weakenin g. I think that's certainly very evident in the forest sector, which both on the coast and in the interior can only be described as being in crisis. It's notable and very remarkably disappointing that in the budget address all that the Minister of Finance offered up on behalf of the government was another reference to the Premier's round table on forestry. There was some reference to federal assistance and to a will to find common solutions, al though those solutions are not described.

This is a government that has made big legislative changes in the structure of the forest industry in 2003 and has had it all its own way since then. The results are there to see as mill after mill throughout the prov- ince closes. To return to the issue of the weaknesses in the economy that the government ought to turn its attention to, the next one that Mr. Fi nlayson talks about is that B.C. has a low export intensity. In total exports as a share of GDP in 2006, British Columbia is at the bottom of the Canadian provinces. It's last. This is Mr. Finlayson.

Th is is not some conspirato- rial reference to an advocacy group, as some of the ministers opposite would have it. This is based on Sta- tistics Canada and the provincial economic accounts. His calculation is of total exports as a share of GDP in 2006, the smallest percentage of any province in the country. That includes a ll the obvious ones. We're behind even Prince Edward Island and Nova Scotia.

That weakness of the traditional export sector in British Columbia, as reflected particularly in the forest industry, and the beginning of the waning of the con- struction boom pose some obvious economic challenges for us here, for the economy here in British Columbia and for the kind of government leadership that one would expect to see in constructing a budget. [1435] As I said, Mr. Finlayson in February of 2008 addressed the higher learning symposium and again offered his opinion on the direction of the economy.

As I said, his view of the B.C. economy had grown a little bit more pessimistic just based on the changes. I think there has been a real shift in the view of com- mentators coming out of January and early February and of the public in general. There's a growing concern about the economy. He says in his report that the United States is downshifting, led by the housing sector. The credit market difficulties aggravate the housing downturn. Slumping home values, high energy costs and weaker job growth threaten consumption in the United States.

Consumption is valued by many experts as being as much as 72 percent of gr oss domestic product in the United States, so when U.S. consumers stop buying, their economy begins to lose momentum very, very rapidly. Other modest growth is also ahead for the European Union, Japan and Canada. I want to turn to what he has to say about the British Columbia economy and to fo cus on a couple of chal- lenges for anyone looking at the economy and its future here. He once again notes that exports are structurally weak and recently falling.

They've continued to fall, although there's a slight — particularly to the United States…. That obviously reflects lumber sales. Most export categories — this is the change in value of B.C. international merchandise exports 2006-2007 — are negative. So not only is it not growing, but it's shrinking in most categories of exports. That's very troubling for a small subnational juris- diction of just over four million people, essentially export- and trade-oriented. We really have a very small domestic market, certainly not enough to sustain us. Later in his lecture he makes comments on some of the obvious things.

"The pine beetle disaster, a forest health issue of unprecedented scope." That's what he calls it — the pine beetle disaster. He speaks of the chal- lenges in addressing regional impacts and dislocation, developing "replacement" economic activity in the infected regions and nurturing non-forestry export sectors for British Columbia. In the budget speech the government, faced with this calamity in forests that for….

Any of those members who represent constituents outside the lower mainland, lower Vancouver Island and perhaps the Okanagan Valley will immediately recognize the obvious statements that he has made here. It's very disturbing and very lacking in leadership in the budget for the governme nt on this important file to have nothing other than: "There's going to be a

9814 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES W EDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 round table. We're hoping the federal government will bring some money, and we have the will to find some solutions." That really, I think, for most people throughout the province, other than in the metropolitan areas I've listed just moments ago, is very cold comfort.

Given the regulatory and business tools that the government has and has had at its disposal since 2003 and the major changes in the forestry legislation, I think that really is an indictment of their failed policies on this file. [1440] Now, sometimes what the government likes to point to in this jurisdiction in British Columbia is that while so-called traditional industries may be declining, the high-technology industries are going to replace forestry. There's a new growth of new industry, and that will replace those industries. He, given his audience there perhaps, did address that sector.

What's striking about B.C. high-tech as a percentage of the provincial gross domestic product is that essen- tially, despite some modest improvements in the late '90s, I think, it has been flat from 2000 to 2006 — 5.2 percent in 2000, 5.1 percent in 2002, 5.3 in 2003, climbing to 5.5 in 2004, declining to 5.2 and 5.1. Now, the most recent year, it's 5.2 percent.

In an area of the economy that's often touted as the future of the economy, providing new growth, new jobs and creating the kind of economic dynamism that will replace some of the so-called — and I don't agree with this categorization — traditional industries of the province…. It's essentially been flat. That really is, again, disturbing, and I think this view was captured by Vancouver city councillor Peter Ladner.

He is a member of a political grouping that's certainly not the same as the members on this side of the House, although he's a well-respected city councillor and owner of a newspaper that comments regularly on business matters. In an

article in B.C.

Business in August 2007, talking about the regional economy in the lower mainland — but I think this applies even more so now to the broader economy across the province — he warns: "But all booms end, and when you look beyond real estate speculations and one-time Olympics construction, our productivity is declining, our research-driven high- growth 'new' industries ar e lagging behind their com- petitors, and head office employment is declining." To continue with the quotation: "The foundations of all this growing wealth — they're shaky at best." So there's someone who I don't think is politically aligned with the opposition, who understands, though, the economy not only in the lower mainland but throughout the province.

His professional life is in- volved in commenting on newspaper and other economic matters. And that's his view of where the economy is at. He echoes the same concern that Mr. Finlayson expresses about the absence of real growth in the new industries — the so-called high-tech sector. There are some measures in the budget that certainly look at the film sector, which was the subject of targeted tax relief by the previous NDP governments. That tradition has continued.

Certainly, giving credit for the labour component was particularly innovative, but that's been modelled elsewhere, and it's very competitive between jurisdictions to attract the film business to this province. That competition continues, but we have established an industry here in the 1990s. It hasn't been driven away. It hasn't grown to the extent that it now supplants other more traditional industries of the province. [1445] There was a discussion by some thinkers in the city of Vancouver and the region about how to make the lower mainland a more effective and dynamic area economically.

Professor Muzyka, who's the dean of commerce at the faculty of commerce at the University of British Columbia and was at that point the chair of the board of trade in Vancouver, endeavoured, beginning in 2005, to create a regional development mechanism in order to, as many other jurisdictions do very effectively, begin to think seriously about how we face the competitive challenges of a global economy. He met with a lack of interest on the part of the business community, no support from the Minister of Economic Development, and the project has simply fallen away. That's notwithstanding that, for example, the B.C.

Progress Board says the following in one of its recent reports. I'm going to quote: "Competitive economies of the next few decades will be underpinned to a considerable extent by city states in many instances. This implies that the lower mainland will need to cooperate much more closely to increase regional competitiveness, especially with respect to the critical factors and activities that underpin economic development activities." The Premier's own economic Progress Board has given this advice. The dean of commerce at the faculty of commerce at UBC has given this advice.

Has the Minister of Economic Development, has the Finance Minister…? Is that reflected anywhere in the budget? The kinds of regional economic grouping s that are necessary, the serious thinking, the inventory, the opportunity to build the economic clusters that Michael Porter of Harvard University talks about…. Is there any serious interest in that in the budget? There's none whatsoever. That's particularly disturbing at a time when the economic ground is shifting under our feet, and those kinds of initiatives are going to become more important, not less important.

Every informed observer in these matters takes that seriously, but apparently, the message hasn't gotten through to the government. I guess that if we are to create a competitive, inno- vative, dynamic and egalitarian economy here…. Egali- tarian economies are generally considered to be more efficient because when you don't have the same great disparities of income between people, you have greater social harmony and there's less social dislocation. The Premier's Progress Board confirms that. If you look at jurisdictions like Finland or Taiwan, those are very effective by any economic measure.

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES 9815 Finland is a country, granted culturally homogenous for the most part, except perhaps in the north, where there are some aboriginal people…. It is regarded by most measures of economic effectiveness and competi- tiveness as being one of the leading economies in the world. It has a population of slightly over four million, and it offers examples that we might do well to consider. The forest sector in Finl and has four of the leading ten international companies in forestry.

The research component of what those companies do dwarfs anything that takes place here, and certainly, the opportunity to build a globally leading forest sector here in British Columbia has been completely missed. Indeed, we're heading in the other direction. What little manufacturing we had in terms of even rudimentary milling is disappearing with the end of appurtenancy. Remanufacturing operations are experi- encing a shortage of log supply and cost pressures.

They're experiencing difficu lty, and increasingly, the f o r e s t s e c t o r i n t h i s p r o v i n c e i s r e d u c e d t o e x p o r t o f raw, unprocessed logs. That's a long way from the achievements of the highly competitive world-leading forestry companies that are based in Finland, a popula- tion of about the same size as British Columbia. [1450] There are other voices that speak of this direction and other advice that's been offered and not acted upon by the government in this budget — for example, research investment.

The Premier's own technology council in its recent report speaks of research investment, and they have something to offer. I'm going to quote from their report. "Research investment is the most important direct contributor to innovation and commercialization.

Currently B.C.'s investment in research accounts for only 1.5 percent of the province's GDP, compared to Ontario 2.4 percent, Quebec 2.7, California 4.1 and Massachu- setts 5.3 percent." The PTC, the Premier's Te chnology Council, believes that British Columbia should establish a long-term strategic target of raising R-and-D investment to 4.5 percent of GDP, with 65 percent of this coming from the private sector.

So it's not necessarily a government-led initiative, but it's a question of setting a strategic direction, having some leadership from the Premier, from the Minister of Finance and from the Minister of Economic Develop- ment about the economic challenges that this province faces and setting some targets in this area, rather than…. This obviously would require some spending. This can't be achieved simply through tax cuts. There is a role for state leadership in this endeavour.

This is very clear from the Finnish example, from the Taiwanese example and from other examples of small, competitive, innova- tive, vigorous economies throughout the world. I'm going to continue reading from the Premier's technology report. "To spearhead this initiative, we've proposed the creation of a new ministry of research and talent. As uni- versities are central to creating clusters" — by clusters they're referring to the economic clusters that Prof.

Michael Porter speaks about — "we also recommend that the province must set the goal of making one of them a top-20 global institution and develop plans to attract new faculty and graduate students. Finally, to capitalize on creativity, university and industry liaison arrangements need to be more uniform to reduce the current complex- ity involved in sharing marketable ideas." That goal of choosing one of B . C . ' s u n i v e r s i t i e s a n d setting a target for it of being one of the top 20 univer- sities in British Columbia has not gone unremarked. Prof.

Stephen Toope at the University of British Co- lumbia…. I express no bias here, but I happen to be a graduate of UBC. I think that in one of the e-mails that they send out regularly to graduates, he has already ad- dressed this issue. He's prepared to take up the challenge. No doubt, the professors, the leadership and the president of Simon Fraser are similarly prepared to do that, as would be the professors or the presidents of University of Victoria and University of Northern British Columbia.

Certainly, it's a question of setting those kinds of eco- nomic goals — 4.5 percent of GDP devoted to research and development, to create a world-leading university. I'm not disparaging any of the universities in this prov- ince, but they can do more and are willing to do more. W e h a v e n ' t s e e n t h a t k i n d o f l e a d e r s h i p f r o m t h e government. This budget, as we head into an economic downturn, doesn't have much to offer. Interjection. B. Ralston: I'm just reflecting the opinion of expert economists rather than the untutored opinions of those members opposite.

I'm speaking of one member in particular, whose name I won't dignify by placing it on the Hansard record. I want to continue, though, with this report of the Premier's Technology Council, because again, this is ad- vice that the government has set up to take and provide. They apparently aren't prepared to act on this advice. [1455] They have some suggestions on how to attract what they call the best and the brightest talent. They say that "high-tech firms often have difficulties in attracting high- quality personnel as well as senior executives.

Through its extensive consultations, the Premier's Technology Council has learned that housing costs, taxation levels and immigrant approval proc esses are barriers to the inflow of talent." They have some suggestions about how the gov- ernment might tackle that. None of those are forthcom- ing in the Speech from the Throne, none of those are forthcoming in the budget, an d I await some action by the government on that account.

I think that's particularly important when we look at the general economic landscape here in the province, as the temperature cools somewhat in the United States and we look for solutions to keep this economy going in a way that it won't as world commodity prices decline. On the other side of the social equation, another area where the government and the throne speech and the budget in particular were notably deficient was in

9816 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES W EDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 the area of poverty reduction. What has become very evident is that this issue has become virtually a post- partisan issue. Governments across the country of dif- ferent political views have taken leadership on this issue. Premier Danny Williams, who's a Conservative Pre- mier of Newfoundland, has taken personal ownership of the target of reducing long-term poverty in Newfound- land. When you look at his home page on his website, that's one of the things that pops up. That's something he is personally committed to. That's a leadership position.

We've heard nothing like that from this government at all. It simply doesn't appear to be a priority. Jean Charest, a Liberal Premier of Quebec, has a strategy to reduce poverty — social exclusion is how it's described there — similarly placed high up on the political agenda, a target for leadership at the provincial level in Quebec. Premier Dalton McGuinty, the newly re-elected Liberal Premier of Ontario, has signalled his intention by November 2008 to have a detailed poverty reduction program in place with targets and a strategy.

This approach of targeting those on the margins of society, the poor in our so ciety, is something that a number of governments across the country have taken on, but there doesn't seem to be, judging from the com- plete absence of mentioning it in the throne speech or in the budget, a priority in any way for this government.

It's significant, I thin k, that Judith Maxwell — who's a former senior policy person in Ottawa and who chaired the Economic Council of Canada at one point, I believe — has said that given some of the measures that the federal government has taken, coordination between the federal government and the provincial government programs would be advantageous in order to make that kind of a strategy effective. That's what she's advocating, and she speaks of these three provincial governments positively as a goal that should be achieved.

I'm optimistic that the government of British Co- lumbia, the Minister of Fi nance and the Premier, in particular, will accept the challenge that's been, I sup- pose, indirectly raised by other Premiers across the country and take this on as a strategic priority. [1500] If I might respond to some of the comments that were made by the minister earlier in question period today on this topic, since I'm on this topic. Judith Maxwell says: "The road to poverty reduction goes far beyond rais- ing social assistance rates.

It is primarily an investment in programs and services that get adults off welfare and out of working poverty. It means targeting extra supports to put children and youth, especially aboriginal children and youth, on a path to economic independence." She goes on to say: "This agenda creates immense challenges for gov- ernments. It forces them to break down the silos between ministries in order to create citizen-centred programs and services. It forces them to think clearly about what their targets are and how they will measure progress.

And most difficult of all, it seems, it forces them to coordinate provincial and federal initiatives." That's a senior economic poli cy person advocating that provincial governments across the country take some leadership of this issue, but there's nothing in this budget to address that at all in any way. That's rather disappointing, to say the least. This v iew of the socia l condition is not something that is generated on this side of the House. Indeed, I've been guided in my thinking about this by the B.C. Progress Board, the Premier's own Progress Board, in its report of Decem- ber 15, 2006.

The Progress Board was so struck by the long-term persistence of the proportion of British Columbians liv- ing below the Statistics Canada low-income threshold…. They were so struck that they commissioned a special report — a senior economist and sociologist, I believe, from Ontario — to look at this and find out what might be the reasons for this persistence and how the gov- ernment might address it. So far, no action has been taken. This is something that is known to the government.

It makes it a little bit harder to ignore, I would think, given that it's the very board that's struck to advise the Premier and the cabinet on economic directions for the province. I think it's relatively hard to ignore when you have this body populated by those who the govern- ment presumably has sufficient confidence to appoint to the board making these statements. What they say is: "Low income matters for two reasons. First, equality of opportunity is an important goal in British Columbia.

All children, irrespective of their social background, should have an equal chance to succeed in the province, and there is compelling evidence that children from low- income families are at greater risk. "Second, governments and society as a whole bear important collective costs that flow from high levels of economic marginalization in the province." I'll just repeat that. "Secondly, governments and society as a whole bear important collective costs that flow from high levels of economic marginalization in the province.

The fact that one in ten British Columbians lives on the economic margins for extended periods stands as a pressing policy challenge." That's the Premier's own Progress Board report on the social conditions in British Columbia. Are there any programs in the throne speec h to address that? Is there a strategy in the budget? Are there any long-term goals on poverty reduction? Absolutely not. It's not because the cabinet and the government don't know about this. The Premier's own Progress Board has very carefully, in a detailed report that's about 50 pages, set out all the statistics. It's overwhelmingly convincing.

The evidence is there. The consequences, particularly to children, are there. This is not just some advocacy group — although they do great work; I often take much advice from advo- cacy groups — that the government can simply brush aside. This is the Premier's own B.C. progress report on the social conditions in British Columbia. I look forward to a budget and a throne speech which begin to address that pressing problem in our society. This throne speech and this budget — this

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES 9817 budget in particular, since that's the one we're debating — does not address that. Th at's one of the reasons — that policy failure, that failure of political leadership — that I won't be supporting the budget when it comes to a vote in this House. [1505] I w a n t t o m o v e o n n o w t o o t h e r t o p i c s t h a t a r e raised by the tabling of the documents associated with the budget. One of those documents that were tabled at the time of the budget was the service plan and the prospective budget for B.C. Hydro.

What is clear is that for British Columbia ratepayers, British Columbia con- sumers — those of us who pay our hydro bills every month or two — rates are going up very dramatically. The budget shows in some of the ancillary documents to it that Hydro customers in B.C. will see a rate hike of 24 percent compounded over the next three years. What is clear from the bu dgetary documents is that the artificial constraints that have been placed upon B.C.

Hydro the definition of self-sufficiency that has been torqued beyond economic rationality in order to create a market for independent power producer power — are now resulting in rate hikes to consumers. Interjection. B. Ralston: I detect some grumbling on the other side. I suppose they can't take the truth. But it's very clear that that's what's happened to the great, the proud — the crown jewel of British Columbia — B.C. Hydro.

These artificial limits that have been placed upon it to cover the costs of uneconom ic, inefficient and environ- mentally destructive private power projects are now coming home to roost. These rate increases, I dare say, are the first of many that will come about. Private power or hydro power in British Columbia has been part of the successful economic strategy set in place by W.A.C. Bennett. W. A.C. Bennett created B.C. Hydro by expropriation — not that I suppose members opposite would have supported it at that time. Maybe they did. I don't know. But that was a taking by the state of B.C.

Electric — formerly a private company — expropriating it and turning it to public purposes. What is clear is that that legacy is being eroded in order to create artificial limits — directives to the B.C. Utilities Commission to create artificially inflated prices for power that ratepayers here in British Columbia will have to pay over the long term.

At a time when our economy is going to be tested, at a time when we're facing the prospect of cooling growth in the United States and its consequences here, that economic advantage for businesses, for ratepayers here in British Columbia, is being systematically and deliberately lost. That is a policy failure. That's the wrong direction that this government is taking on this issue. The B.C. budget and the ancillary documents that are tabled with it confirm that those power rates are going to increase over the next three years and will continue to increase.

The other topic that I want to address — part of the general economic and social climate here in the prov- ince, which is again not addressed in the budget — is any initiatives for public safe ty in the province.

One of the things that attract people to continue to live and work in big cities in our province and indeed through- out the world is a sense of personal security and safety as they go about their daily business. [1510] What has happened recently — and I think the Attorney General can confirm this and will confirm this — is that the unprecedented spate of gang shootings, notwithstanding the best efforts of the police, is leading people to become increasingly concerned about safety in our cities.

I recently hosted an event in my constituency with Eileen Mohan, whose son Chris Mohan, and with Steve Brown, whose brother-in-law Ed Schellenberg…. Both were innocent bystanders in a gang shooting and were slain along with four other young men in an apartment building in Surrey. The consequences and the ripple effect and the kind of impact that has on our communities are difficult to describe. In talking with Eileen Mohan, certainly no one ex- pects to bring up their son or daughter to encounter that fate at such a young age.

It's obviously and simply a tragedy, but I think it speaks of a larger public concern that people have, and there's nothing in the budget to address that. The throne speech talks ab out creating a sentencing commission, a slight shift in policy on regional policing perhaps and a prospect of some further studies down the road, sometime in the au tumn of this year. That doesn't address what citizens, certainly in the lower mainland, are experiencing and wondering about.

It doesn't address, I think, the growing problem that we may be building in terms of our reputation nationally and that may spill out over, unfortunately — I hope not — into our reputation internationally. Those are not things that we want to be known for, obviously. Citizens don't wa nt to have that kind of fear, that kind of anxiety, that kind of worry when they go about their daily li ves in the cities and towns of our province. The government hasn't taken a lead- ership position on this is sue. There are things that could be done. Certainly, the police forces have some strong suggestions.

One suggestion was that in Quebec, when gang warfare became very open and there were a number of public shootings and tragic killings of innocent by- standers, the state…. The province of Quebec devoted more resources to policing and to prosecution and made a very determined fight against criminal gangs in Quebec. I think it has, by all measures, succeeded in eliminating most of the gang warfare with a series of high-profile trials and convictions of those responsible for much of the violence in Quebec.

Again, it's something that's missing from the budget and that's missing from the throne speech for the most part. It's something that people really want to hear about and are looking for leadership on. There's nothing in the budget speech from the Finance Minister that even begins to address those concerns.

9818 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES W EDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 With those comments on the budget, I will con- clude my remarks and give the floor over to the next member of the Legislature who rises to speak. J. Yap: I t ' s m y h o n o u r t o r i s e a n d s p e a k o n t h i s budget. But first of all, I want to acknowledge a number of key people who help me in the work that I do here as a member of this House: my constituency assistants Paige Robertson and PoWah Ng in Richmond, and in Victoria my executive assistant Nicole Hamilton and communication officer and research officer Sarah Morris and Justin Molander.

These are the people who work hard to help me here, and I thank them for their diligence and support. They help make me look good, and I appreciate their support. [1515] Madam Speaker, we continue to make great pro- gress in British Columbia, in spite of the fairly subdued and gloomy presentation by the speaker before me, the member for Surrey-Whalley. I believe this is a visionary budget that supports a visionary agenda for our prov- ince. This is a fitting position for the people of B.C. as we celebrate this year our 150th anniversary of being a province.

On behalf of my constituents from the great riding of Richmond-Stevest on, I am proud to endorse and support this budget, which I believe will continue to move B.C. forward. We've come a long way with our economy, now one of the strongest, if not the strongest, in Canada. After a dismal decade of the 1990s, when the NDP were in power and B.C. we nt from first to worst…. When the rest of the world was doing well, B.C. went from first to worst. But thanks to the hard work of British Columbians and our B.C.

Liberal government's policies, B.C. is now back, and we are truly in the midst of a golden decade in British Columbia. We are blessed to live in a truly special part of the world — I believe the best place on earth. However, with this blessing comes a responsibility, which we all share, to deal with the effects of global warming. Climate change is the challenge of our times. It is a priority for British Columbians and a priority for our government. I support the proposed revenue-neutral carbon tax, which will be a first step to reduce the carbon foot- prints we leave on this earth.

This carbon tax will be implemented, as laid out in the budget, in a fiscally responsible manner phased in over the next four years. The budget calls for the carbon tax to be offset fully by reductions in personal and corporate income taxes. I applaud the Minister of Finance for balancing the priority to deal with climat e change with the priority to ensure that our economy remains strong. The Min- ister of Finance said it perf ectly. A strong economy is fundamental to everything we do. Our economy is on a roll.

I realize that the member for Surrey-Whalley was trying to paint a gloomy pic- ture, but actually things are going well for the province of British Columbia. British Columbians today are con- fident and optimistic abou t their economic future. Business confidence is high. The Canadian Federation of Independent Business continuously surveys its members, and for five years in a row, B.C. firms are the most optimistic in the country by a wide margin. The Conference Board of Canada, in their fall 2007 Provincial Outlook, forecasts continued strong economic growth for B.C.

This was in the fall of 2007 when we all were aware of the situation in the United States, which the member for Surrey-Whalley referred to. Unemploy- ment at 4 percent in British Columbia is a historic low — among the best in Canada, the national average being almost 6 percent. Conversely , employment is at record highs, a far cry from the 1990s when we had high unemployment and we were losing people seeking work to other jurisdictions. That was the case in the 1990s — the dismal '90s. We have a record high of 64 percent employment of our population. In December 2007 alone, B.C. added 12,000 full-time jobs.

This past month, January 2008, our economy continued to grow. Interjections. Deputy Speaker: Member. J. Yap: The employment rate grew by 2.4 percent, implying that 53,000 more people were employed, compared to January one year ago. Since December 2001… Interjection. Deputy Speaker: Excuse me. Member. Member. J. Yap: …400,000 new jobs have been created in B.C. Interjection. Deputy Speaker: Member. Member. Hon. R. Thorpe: Yes, Chair. Deputy Speaker: You can apologize. Hon. R. Thorpe: I want to hear the debate. I cannot hear the debate when…. Deputy Speaker: Member, have you heard me? You can apologize. Hon. R.

Thorpe: I will apologize when I can hear the debate. Interjections. Deputy Speaker: Unequivocal. Hon. R. Thorpe: I apologize unequivocally, but I would like to hear the debate. Interjection.

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES 9819 Deputy Speaker: Member. Hon. R. Thorpe: I apologize unequivocally. [1520] J. Yap: We're now in the fortunate position of, instead of people looking for jobs, jobs looking for people. We have the challenge of meet ing increasing needs for skilled labour in many sectors, thanks to the strong economy. Business creation and investment in B.C. continue to increase. The member for Surrey-Whalley lamented that high- tech was really not doing as well as we believe it is. Well, I have something to say.

Microsoft will be investing in our province, in my community in Richmond, and will create 700 jobs — that little company, Microsoft. Whether it's Microsoft investing in Richmond and British Columbia or the record number of small businesses that start in our province, investors are showing their confidence in B.C. and choosing to do business here. Indeed, the small business sector, the backbone of our economy, has been thriving. Between 2001 and 2006 small business growth was 11 percent. That's growth of 11 percent, more than triple the national average of 3.6 percent.

The number of new business incorporations in my community of Richmond has increased every year under our government with an all-time record reported in 2006. The member for Surrey-Whalley talked about ex- perts around the world suggesting that British Columbia could have some issues. I would like to refer to a release by the MasterCard Worldwide Centres of Commerce Index. MasterCard Worldwide listed Metro Vancouver among its top 50 worldwide centres of commerce — cities that drive global commerce. Vancouver was ranked number one in Canada ahead of Toronto and Montreal.

It's another endorsement of the great progress that we're making here in British Columbia. Evidence of this progress is everywhere. Walk along No. 3 Road, the main road in Richmond, and you see our community being transformed by the new Canada line, new developments, highrises and construction of new facilities, both residential and commercial. Take a drive through the expanding commercial and industrial parks throughout Metro Vancouver, and you see signs of expansion and growth everywhere.

Let your fingers do the walk ing, and you see the career pages of the newspapers with pages and pages of unfilled job vacancies. Our mining exploration sector, so much a part of our history, recorded its best year ever in 2007 — $416 million in annual economic activity, an increase of 57 percent over 2006 and 1,300 percent over 2001. The oil and gas industry also had a record year in 2007, surpassing $1 billion in rights sales, shattering the previous record of $647 million in 2003. The high-tech sector, which I mentioned, continues to thrive.

This is what the president of Microsoft Can- ada, Phil Sorgen, had to say about Microsoft's reasons for investing in B.C. "We have burgeoning high-tech and software industries and a globally envied quality of life, and our cities repres ent exactly the kind of envi- ronment that leading information workers want to live in. This centre will help Microsoft remain globally competitive while providing strong economic benefits to B.C. and Canada." The retail sector is strong — in fact, so strong that it's the rare retail shop that is not seeking more employees to meet with the record leve l of business volumes.

To quote Mark Startup, Retail B.C. president, in the The Vancouver Sun recently: "We're firing on all cylinders, and almost every category is strong right now. We haven't seen as many commu nities reporting positive growth during my whole time here at Retail B.C., which is over a quarter of a century." British Columbia is a trading province. We always have been, and we always will be. Our future prosperity as a people depends on expanding our trade opportu- nities.

As this millennium continues to unfold, B.C. is well positioned as Canada's only Pacific province — that's right; we're Canada 's only Pacific province — to benefit from the great econom ic transformation that is happening in the Asia-Pacific, including China and India and the other Asia-Pacific countries. [1525] The budget earmarks $30 million in funding to further promote our business , trade and cultural links with the Asia-Pacific region . I know this will make a major difference in ensuring that we continue to make gains in Asia-Pacific trade. The growth is impressive.

The member for Surrey- Whalley was trying to minimize the extent of this. But let me share with you, Madam Speaker, that the export trade with the Asia-Pacific region has grown steadily from $6.9 billion in 2001 to almost $10 billion in 2006. Through the Asia-Pacific Initiative our government has made trade development wi th the economies of the region a priority, and this budget affirms this priority. My community, Richmond, is uniquely positioned to contribute to this growth in the Asia-Pacific trade.

We have in Richmond a sizeable immigrant popula- tion, many of whom have ongoing family and busi- ness links with their countries of origin. The budget refers to strengthening the International Financial Centre program further, and I applaud this because this will enhance B.C.'s posi tion as a business centre in the global economy, which is so important in this day and age. The budget reflects continued sound management of public finances.

Through effective leadership and management we have moved our province away from the reckless deficit spending of the 1990s to consecutive fiscal surpluses, with this year's being the fifth surplus budget delivered by our government. Public debt is being carefully managed, with the ratio of taxpayer- supported debt to GDP steadily decreasing. B.C.'s strong economic performance has gained international recognition. In 2007 Standard and Poor's, the debt-rating agency, up graded our province's debt rating to triple-A, the best possible rating. This is what they said. Standard and Poor's cited strong

9820 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES W EDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 budgetary performance, strong management culture and improved transparency as reasons for the upgrade. This is what the Institut e of Chartered Accountants of B.C. had to say. This is from their CEO, Richard Rees, about B.C.'s improved econo my. He said this recently: "B.C.'s chartered accountants believe that government policy has influenced the province's strong economic performance.

In particular, lower business and personal tax rates and a reduction of red tape have played an important role in encouraging both people and invest- ment to the province." The power of a strong economy is in the jobs that it creates. The power of a strong economy is in the oppor- tunities for building on ou r shared progress as a prov- ince. The power of a strong economy is in the revenues to government that allow us to invest in the priorities important to British Columbians. This budget, all $37.7 billion of it, earmarks investments in the priority areas of British Columbians — priority areas like health care.

Our strong economy has al lowed us to continue to make historic high levels of investments in health care. We have a great health care system that is there for those who need it. I am pleased to see the government's com- mitment to ensuring that our public health care system remains well funded, with two-thirds of all new spending to be allocated to our public health care system. The budget provides for investments in vital research areas such as Genome B.C., brain research, cancer research, and hip health and osteoporosis research.

The budget increases, as well, the funding in that other important area, K-to-12 education and advanced educa- tion. We're investing more than ever in our public, elemen- tary and secondary school system, even though student enrolment is declining. I am pleased to see the increased funding for expansion of the number of preschool Strong- Start programs to 400, which will help build literacy in the early childhood years, which is so important. I have had the opportunity to visit schools in my community with these early literacy programs in action, and they are invaluab le.

We're investing signifi- cantly in advanced education, in keeping with our commitment to add 25,000 new post-secondary spaces throughout the province. This budget provides the unprecedented increase in training that is underway in our province. We are training more doctors, more nurses and more trades apprentices today than we ever have in our history. [1530] Of course, the budget puts our province at the fore- front in the battle against climate change, with major initiatives to encourage British Columbians to transi- tion to a lower-carbon-emissions way of life.

British Columbians care deeply about the environ- ment, about the effects of greenhouse gas emissions on our climate. With this budget our government takes specific, targeted action to lead the change, to lead the transforma- tion which people expect and want. This budget includes initiatives to reduce carbon emissions, to invest in green technologies and to encourage energy conservation. [K. Whittred in the chair.] Our strong economy allows us to expand public transportation.

Our government has committed to the largest-ever investment in public transit in Metro Van- couver, the Okanagan, Greater Victoria and other areas of the province — $14 billion over the next 12 years. This is a visionary transit plan that will help improve the movement of people and goods to further spur the economy and help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The link is obvious. If we can encourage more urban commuters to use public tran sit, there will be fewer cars on the road, and carbon emissions will be reduced. This is what is envisioned for Richmond with the arrival of the Canada line.

The Canada line is progressi ng well. In fact, just yes- terday the last concrete block was put into place on the southernmost end of the No. 3 Road guideway of the Canada line. It is on sch edule and on budget. Even though the Canada line is not scheduled to be completed until 2009, already there are a multitude of residential developments that have been built, are underway or are planned to be built in the next while, transforming the downtown skyline of my community, Richmond.

This budget makes significant provisions for support- ing the arts and culture in B.C., so important to the vitality of communities throughout our province. I know that British Columbians will be very creative and innovative as we celebrate our 150th anniversary this year. The new BC150 cultural trust fund will go a long way to providing funding for the arts and culture this special year and into the future.

Along with my constituents, I am personally looking forward to the BC150 celebration called Rivermania, which will happen on September 28 at Garry Point Park in Steveston in my community, which I've previously talked about in this House. As well, the $105 million for arts and culture projects will truly help honour and celebrate our shared heritage and history. B.C. is the destination of choice for business and investment. This budget will help maintain this for the benefit of all British Columbians. This budget will en- sure continued confidence in our economic prospects.

This budget will meet the needs, the hopes, the aspira- tions and the dreams of British Columbians. This budget will ensure that B.C. remains competi- tive. In a global economy — and this is one point where I agree with the previous speaker; we are in a global economy — it's essential that we keep B.C. competitive. Since 2001 our government has reduced personal income tax rates, and with the further income tax rates with this budget, we will have in B.C. the lowest mar- ginal rates anywhere in Canada for those earning up to $111,000.

Individuals earning up to $16,000 per annum will pay zero income tax, and 250,000 British Columbi- ans benefit from this. While income tax rates have been reduced, we have seen overall personal incomes rise thanks to the strong economy. Personal incomes have been rising steadily since 2001, with the 7.4 percent increase in 2006 the highest ever. What a turnar ound from the 1990s, when average take-home pay per person dropped by $1,738 under the NDP, when B.C. had some of the highest personal income tax rates in the country.

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2008 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES 9821 As I said, B.C. is back. This budget will ensure that our future as a people and as a province under this government will continue to be bright. I agree with the Minister of Finance when sh e says we should not have to choose between a strong economy and dealing with climate change. This is a budget which achieves both objectives in a thoughtful, balanced way. [1535] In closing, I am proud to support this budget.

This budget will set British Columbia on a transformative path to a better place — to take action as a people; to deal with the challenge of our times; to make our lives better, health- ier and enlightened — for a world that will be better for our children and our children's children. This is a budget for the times, and I thank the Minister of Finance for her vision, her wisdom and her contributions to the province. N. Simons: It's my honour and privilege to stand here and respond to the budg et that was presented in the House yesterday.

I'd like to take this opportunity to warn the sensitive members on the government side that it might not all be positive. So in case it catches them off guard, in case they think that maybe I'm going to be pointing out like the advertorial we just heard, that is not going to be the case. I might actually even point to certain issues that seem to be completely for- gotten in the government's mind and in their actions. There's a disconnect between their advertisement in the throne speech and the actu al delivery in the budget speech.

Some of the most startling contradictions are the ones that I'd like to poin t out to the people of the province. They are already, I believe, starting to question whether all the gloss and shine is not actually covering up something more deep and concerning to the people of British Columbia — and sinister, in fact, with the level of poverty that exists in this province. Are we actually seeing an increase in the disparate earnings of the rich and the poor? Are we actually seeing that gap expanding, and what is the consequence of that? That's the larger issue.

The specific issues brough t to the House's attention by previous speakers are quotes from corporations that are pleased with certain aspects of the budget. What I'd like to do is represent the community that I have been elected by, and that is the community of Powell River– Sunshine Coast. It's a community that has, like many other commu- nities in rural British Columbia, been absolutely left out of this budget for a number of reasons. Some of them are obvious, and some of them need to be pointed out. I don't know if the…. We'll see.

The first one I'd like to bring up is that the discon- nection between the throne speech and the budget was the issue of Jordan's principle. For those of you who don't know about Jordan's principle, Jordan was a little first nations child in Manitoba who was born with severe health problems whic h caused him to have to live in a major urban city, near a hospital — in a hospi- tal, in fact. He was approximately two when he was able to return home, but due to government infighting — provincial and federal governments trying to argue on who was responsible for the payments for that child's care….

Because of that dispute, Jordan remained in hospital, where he died two years later. The principle says that as a consequence of the attention brought to that particular case, we are to look after the children first and worry about the funding for that child's care later. It was probably a hastily added

section of the throne speech, because it doesn't show any reflection in the budget. I don't know if this is something that was deliberate or not. It certainly was a recent decision of this government to support Jordan's principle, but un- fortunately, I believe they support the principle in prin- ciple. That doesn't get first nations children anywhere closer to the level of care that is offered off reserve. I think that Jordan's prin ciple, which requires that the federal and provincial government not argue over the funding for a child's care, should be implemented.

Unfortunately, there's no indi cation in the budget that adequate resources will be put in place to achieve that particular goal. Right now there are 25 delegated first nations child welfare agencies in the prov ince that are operating on federal funding. The federal funding is specifically for services on reserve.

Unfortunately, many of the services on reserve aren't able to meet the service levels that are provided off reserve, and th at disparity is what's sup- posed to be addressed by the implementation and the endorsement of Jordan's principle. [1540] The federal government and, unanimously, the federal parliament supported Jordan's principle. British Columbia should be the first province to do so, and I encourage the province to actu ally put that into effect. But it will require more than words.

It will require more than a simple "we agree with the principle." It will require resources, it will require energy, and it will require a commitment, in fact, to try to level the disparities that exist now. I am afraid that I have not seen any evidence that the commitment is there beyond the words. Jordan's principle, which will actually allow children in British Columbia to receive care wherever they live, should be endorsed by this government. They've said that they would, but there is no indication in the budget that they are prepared to do so.

I believe it's partly because they don't really know what it meant. I believe that it was added on at such a late date in the process that they actually did not do due diligence and figure out that it would require seri- ous consideration. In fact, what we heard the govern- ment say is that they want to start negotiating with the federal government about Jordan's principle. That is exactly what the principle is attempting to get rid of — that negotiation first. We don't need to negotiate whether a child should receive medical care or social services that will allow them to live a healthy life.

We need that service provided first. The discussions between the federal and the provincial government should happen after. Right after

9822 B RITISH COLUMBIA DEBATES W EDN

Document details

Collection	British Columbia — Debates (Hansard)
Citation	H0220pm 09
Type	hansard
Volume / chapter	H0220pm 09
Language	en
Format	pdf
Source	PROVINCIAL
Identifier	32e67c2ce51cd03c154c4bcfb79f823de45b6e47

Source file is stored in the law ingest library (pdf).