Manitoba Hansard — 42 5 b027e.php

42-5 b027e.php

Manitoba — Debates (Hansard)

Search the Bills

Current Session:

43 - 3 (2025-

Past Sessions:

43rd Legislature

43 - 2 (2024-2025)

43 - 1 (2023-2024)

42nd Legislature

42 - 5 (2022-2023)

42 - 4 (2021-2022)

42 - 3 (2020-2021)

42 - 2 (2019-2020)

42 - 1 (2019)

41st Legislature

41 - 4 (2018-2019)

41 - 3 (2017-2018)

41 - 2 (2016-2017)

41 - 1 (2016)

40th Legislature

40 - 5 (2015-2016)

40 - 4 (2014-2015)

40 - 3 (2013-2014)

40 - 2 (2012-2013)

40 - 1 (2011-2012)

39th Legislature

39 - 5 (2010-2011)

39 - 4 (2009-2010)

39 - 3 (2008-2009)

39 - 2 (2007-2008)

39 - 1 (2007)

38th Legislature

38 - 5 (2006-2007)

38 - 4 (2005-2006)

38 - 3 (2004-2005)

38 - 2 (2003-2004)

38 - 1 (2003)

37th Legislature

37 - 4 (2002-2003)

37 - 3 (2001-2002)

37 - 2 (2000-2001)

37 - 1 (1999-2000)

Home → Legislative Business → Bills → 42-5

Status of bills in this Session.

5th Session, 42nd Legislature

This HTML version is provided for ease of use and is based on the bilingual version that was distributed in the Legislature after First Reading.

Bill 27

THE INTIMATE IMAGE PROTECTION AMENDMENT ACT

Bilingual version (PDF)

Explanatory Note

(Assented to )

HIS MAJESTY, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba, enacts as follows:

C.C.S.M. c. I87 amended

1 The Intimate Image Protection Act is amended by this Act.

2 The following is added after

section 12:

Reverse onus

12.1 In an action for the non-consensual distribution of an intimate image,

(

a) the distribution of the intimate image is presumed to have occurred without the consent of the person depicted in the image; and

(

b) the defendant must establish that they had reasonable grounds to believe that they had consent to distribute the image at the time that the image was distributed.

Coming into force

3 This Act comes into force on the day it receives royal assent.

Explanatory Note

This Bill amends The Intimate Image Protection Act. It shifts the burden of proof in an action for the non-consensual distribution of an intimate image. The distribution of an intimate image of a person is presumed to have occurred without their consent. A person who distributed the intimate image must establish that they had reasonable grounds to believe that they had consent from the person in the image to distribute that image.

Document details

Collection	Manitoba — Debates (Hansard)
Citation	42-5 b027e.php
Type	bill
Volume / chapter	42 5 b027e.php
Language	en
Format	html
Source	PROVINCIAL
Identifier	43fab3edb90e6b82a2d2d083bf5e275bb9ef9086

Source file is stored in the law ingest library (html).