British Columbia Committee Hansard (Blues) — Wednesday, May 15, 2024, p.m., Issue 439 (42nd Parliament, 5th Session)
20240515pm-CommitteeA-Blues
British Columbia — Debates (Hansard)
Fifth Session, 42nd Parliament
(2024) OFFICIAL REPORT
OF DEBATES
(HANSARD)
Wednesday, May 15, 2024
Afternoon Sitting
Issue No. 439
ISSN 1499-2175
The HTML transcript is provided for informational purposes only.
The PDF transcript remains the official digital version.
CONTENTS
Routine Business
Introductions by Members
Introduction and First Reading of Bills
Bill M227 — Social Workers Amendment Act, 2024
S. Furstenau
Bill M228 — Victims of Crime (Publication Ban Choice and Awareness) Amendment Act, 2024
K. Kirkpatrick
Statements (Standing Order 25B)
Kim Black and cystic fibrosis awareness and fundraising
M. Babchuk
Energetic County Fair
D. Davies
Des Wilson
R. Glumac
Prince George Cougars hockey team and head coach Mark Lamb
S. Bond
Asian Heritage Month and poetry
A. Singh
Central Okanagan Crime Stoppers
B. Stewart
Oral Questions
Cancer care services and hospital project in Surrey
K. Falcon
Hon. A. Dix
T. Halford
Wild salmon population and habitat protection
A. Olsen
Hon. G. Heyman
Building code energy regulations for new housing units
B. Banman
Hon. R. Kahlon
Government action on repeat offenders and crime in communities
E. Sturko
Hon. M. Farnworth
Crime in communities and gang activity in Kamloops
T. Stone
Hon. M. Farnworth
Petitions
P. Milobar
M. Lee
D. Routley
Reports from Committees
Finance and Government Services Committee, interim
report, statutory offices, May 2024
M. Starchuk
T. Shypitka
Human Rights Commissioner Appointment Committee, May
J. Phillip
N. Letnick
Motions Without Notice
Appointment of Human Rights Commissioner
J. Phillip
Tabling Documents
Report on the administration of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, 2023-24
Petitions
S. Chandra Herbert
Orders of the Day
Government Motions on Notice
Motion 33 — Committee of the Whole to sit in
Section C
Hon. R. Kahlon
Third Reading of Bills
Bill 25 — Haida Nation Recognition Amendment Act, 2024
Committee of Supply
Estimates: Office of the Premier
Hon. D. Eby
K. Falcon
Report and Third Reading of Bills
Bill 27 — Municipalities Enabling and Validating (No. 5) Amendment Act, 2024
Motions Without Notice
Amendment to standing orders for Thursday sitting hours
Hon. R. Kahlon
Time allotment for farewell addresses by retiring MLAs
Hon. R. Kahlon
Committee of Supply
Estimates: Office of the Premier (continued)
K. Falcon
Hon. D. Eby
Report and Third Reading of Bills
Bill 26 — Name Amendment Act (No. 2), 2024
Bill 21 — Legal Professions Act
Proceedings in the Douglas Fir Room
Committee of the Whole House
Bill 27 — Municipalities Enabling and Validating (No. 5) Amendment Act, 2024
Hon. R. Kahlon
K. Kirkpatrick
A. Olsen
R. Merrifield
Bill 26 — Name Amendment Act (No. 2), 2024
Hon. A. Dix
S. Bond
Proceedings in the Birch Room
Committee of the Whole House
Bill 21 — Legal Professions Act (continued)
M. Lee
Hon. N. Sharma
WEDNESDAY, MAY 15, 2024
The House met at 1:35 p.m.
[The Speaker in the chair.]
Routine Business
Prayers and reflections: S. Robinson.
Introductions by Members
Hon. A. Dix: Today in the galleries is Jason Jackson, the president of the
Ambulance Paramedics of B.C.; and Warren Leeder, director of health and
wellness for the Ambulance Paramedics of B.C., CUPE Local 873. They lead a
union that’s playing an extraordinary role in transforming our ambulance
system in B.C. They represent ambulance paramedics and dispatchers. They do
an extraordinary job. I’d like you to wish them welcome.
I have another introduction as well, so I’ll go through and have
people welcome both sets of guests today.
From the Arthritis Society of Canada, president and CEO Trish Barbato
is here, and volunteer Mireille Compton.
Trish is the chief executive officer. It’s the leading national health
charity contributing to arthritis research, advocacy and
innovation.
Mireille is a longtime Arthritis Society Canada volunteer who lives
with arthritis. Her teenage daughter was diagnosed with juvenile arthritis
at two years old, and she and her mom live with arthritis and are
extraordinary advocates for people living with arthritis.
I’d like all the House to welcome our ambulance paramedics and the
representatives of the Arthritis Society of Canada.
S. Bond: I wanted to join the Minister of Health today in welcoming our
ambulance paramedics here to Victoria and to extend our thanks, as well, for
the incredible job they do every day. We see the heroic efforts they make in
our province. And also to extend our welcome to Trish Barbato and Mireille
Compton.
Nine hundred thousand people in British Columbia actually are affected
by arthritis — one in six men, one in four women. We know how significant
the impacts are. In fact, the Arthritis Society of Canada recently released
a report card, and we know that British Columbia certainly has more work to
do.
I join with the Minister of Health in welcoming these two very
important groups of representatives here to the chamber today.
Hon. H. Bains: Hon. Speaker, in the gallery today is our good friend, your and my
good friend, Daljit Singh Sidhu of Punjabi Market from Vancouver, and Balbir
Singh Changiara, the community activist. They are here to watch the question
period and watch the proceedings of this House. They have been active in the
community for many, many years.
Please join with me and give them a very warm welcome.
M. de Jong: I’d like the House to welcome a group with whom, I have to admit, I’m
not well acquainted. In fact, probably to an extent greater than most
members, I’ve avoided this group fairly religiously over the last 35 years,
but I still would like to welcome the New Car Dealers to…
[1:40 p.m.]
I actually haven’t seen that many car dealers since the last Social
Credit government.
They, of course, perform a vital service. They are key to our economy.
They provide a product and extended service that virtually all British
Columbians depend upon.
I know my colleagues will make them feel very welcome here in the
assembly.
Hon. J. Whiteside: I have two sets of introductions today.
In the gallery joining us this afternoon are members from my
ministry’s government communications and public engagement team.
I’d like to give a warm welcome to Art, Arianna, Abhinaya, Kris,
Jhosseline, Marie-Helene, Preet and Tracy and thank them for the incredible
work that they do to bring to life all of the projects and the work that we
do in the ministry and across our health system when it comes to the work we
do in Mental Health and Addictions.
Secondly, not quite on the precinct yet but joining me for a meeting
later this afternoon will be Dr. Nel Wieman, the acting chief medical
officer for the First Nations Health Authority; and Dr. Nolan Hop Wo, also
from FNHA.
I want to say that Dr. Wieman’s leadership has been particularly
important during the impact of the toxic drug crisis on Indigenous
communities. She is the first female Indigenous psychiatrist in Canada. I am
very grateful for the collaboration that we have in the ministry with FNHA
and with First Nations in trying to turn the dial on this crisis.
Would the House please join me in welcoming both sets of guests to the
precinct.
Hon. G. Chow: In the gallery are three members of my constituency staff, who are
sitting behind me. They are Forest Chu, Navleen Virk and Kayla Charchuk, who
are visiting the House for the first time.
I’d like to express my deep appreciation for the work they do in the
constituency helping the citizens of British Columbia. I think they chose
the right time to visit. They said: “Well, after tomorrow, you may not be in
the House.”
So thank you.
R. Merrifield: I hope so.
I do want to extend my greatest welcome to Steve Johnston. We said his
name yesterday, but I just wanted to correct for the record. It’s Steve
Johnston. Also, his wife, Leah, is here today.
Also, Dr. Michael Humer is here. I actually had a situation a couple
of weeks ago in which a woman came up to me and said to me: “Do you know how
Dr. Humer is in my phone?” I said: “No, I don’t.” She actually showed me.
“Dr. Mike, the man who saved my husband’s life.”
Dr. Humer is actually a thoracic surgeon, so I asked her: “Oh, did he
perform surgery on your husband?” She said: “No, my husband was suicidal.
He, on his day off, walking with his wife, stopped in our city park and
actually sat down.” For the next three hours, he literally saved this man’s
life.
He is our candidate for Kelowna Centre.
Would the House please join me in welcoming Dr. Michael
Humer.
Hon. N. Sharma: I have a few introductions today.
First, I just want to acknowledge…. I see Cathy Stock from the
Indigenous justice secretariat is joining us.
Also, our Human Rights Commissioner, Kasari Govender, is sitting up
here.
I’d also like to welcome the Native Courtworker and Counselling
Association of B.C. They’re celebrating their 50th anniversary.
With us today are Hugh Braker, KC, president of the Native
Courtworkers. Mr. Braker has been president of the courtworkers for almost
30 years.
We have Mr. Darryl Shackelly, the CEO of the Courtworkers. Mr.
Shackelly has been with the Courtworkers for 27 years.
Mr. Shane Johnson has been with the Victoria Courtworkers for 18
years.
Ms. Rae Alcock, director of court services for the Courtworkers, has
been with the association for two years.
Ms. Lurdes Balfour is the office manager and has been with the
association for four years.
For 50 years, the Native Courtworkers have been providing culturally
appropriate services to Indigenous people in conflict with the law by
explaining to people their rights and responsibilities under the law, by
arranging legal aid, by answering questions about the law, by arranging
translation when necessary and by providing culturally appropriate services
and workshops.
[1:45 p.m.]
It has been 50 years. I just want to thank the Native Courtworkers.
It’s estimated they’ve served over 100,000 people so far.
Congratulations to you. Happy anniversary.
Hon. M. Rankin: Joining us in the gallery for third reading of Bill 25 today are a
number of special guests: Gaagwiis, who is the president of the Council of
the Haida Nation; Guujaaw or Gidansda, Haida Hereditary Chief; Stephen
“Buck” Grosse, the vice-president of CHN; Peter Lantin, former president of
the Council of the Haida Nation; Catherine Rigg and Kat Sanderson of the CHN
negotiating team.
Also in the gallery are Chief Councillor Marilyn Slett of the Heiltsuk
Tribal Council and on the First Nations Summit political executive; and Mr.
Hugh Braker, who has already been introduced by the Attorney
General.
Would the House please make them very welcome.
P. Milobar: I rise to introduce Lianne, a Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in member of the Hän
Nation, also my wife for the last 30 years, who I’ve been told loves me more
than I’ve actually annoyed her, so you know she must love me a lot. She is
the proud mother of our children, Kayleigh, Dylana and Ethan, and
Shëtsǫ to our granddaughters, Zoey
and Azalea.
Will the House please give Lianne a warm welcome.
Hon. P. Alexis: I’ve been up a few times this week, but I’m out of kids. However, I am
pleased to introduce several employees from the Ministry of Agriculture and
Food who have come to watch the proceedings today.
Two co-op students, Melanie Procyshyn and Jillian Kennedy, are
accompanied by Zofka Svec, Riley Chappell and Zac de Vries.
Thank you for the work that you do each and every day.
Would the House please make them welcome.
The Speaker: House Leader of the Fourth Party.
B. Banman: Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Will you please bear with me. I have
a few introductions to make, the first of which I’ve introduced
before.
My charming wife, Sharon, is here to watch the procedures today. She’s
actually, believe it or not, looking forward to having me return for the
summer. I know. It comes as a big surprise for me too.
We also have John and Elaine Lichtenwald, who are trying to bring
affordable housing, actually, to the Cowichan Valley for some hospital
workers.
I have John and Nora Koury. John may or may not be a candidate for a
certain political party, which I understand we’re not allowed to talk about
anymore.
Would the House please welcome all of the guests that are here today
and make them feel most welcome.
Hon. L. Popham: I’ve got a few introductions today.
I just wanted to say that it’s also nice to see Zac de Vries here
joining Agriculture and Food. He’s also a councillor for Saanich.
Thanks for your public service, Zac.
It is also B.C. Museums Week, and I have two special guests here. I
have Lorenda Calvert, who’s the program manager, and Ryan Hunt, the
executive director of B.C. Museums. I’ll be meeting them after to give them
a proclamation.
Thank you for everything that you do.
Then, on a personal note, I’ve got four guests here today, the first
one being my LOML, the love of my life. Dr. Sealey is in the
House.
My stepdaughter Hope, who’s going to Camosun College, is planning on
being a dental hygienist. She wants me to remind everyone to floss or use a
Waterpik. I hear it all the time.
Her roommate, Kayla Liseaut, has just come here from Alberta. She has
come to get a job here in British Columbia.
Thank you for that.
Then we have a legislative assistant, a really good friend to my
stepdaughter, Helena Keenliside.
Everybody says you’re a real favourite.
Thank you, all, for being here.
S. Furstenau: I have two sets of introductions.
In the gallery today…. Well, on Monday, my colleague from Saanich
North and the Islands introduced his A-team from his constituency office.
I’d like to introduce my A-team from my constituency office.
[1:50 p.m.]
Tricia Datene, Julie Kay, Theresa Coles and Laura Boyd-Clowes are in
the gallery. They are powerhouse women. They make a powerhouse team. I
respect and admire them so much, and I’m so grateful for the service that
they bring to the people of Cowichan Valley.
Also in the gallery today are the parents of one-half of our
communications team. The parents of Amy Attas — Jackie Sturton and Mike
Attas, all the way from Manitoba — are in the gallery.
Would the House please make them most welcome.
Hon. J. Osborne: I have two sets of introductions. I was going to space them out, but
seeing the field is full here, I’m going to take the time to do both of
them.
Also, I just want to note that you learn something new every day. The
member for Abbotsford West…. I’m thrilled to know that there’s actually one
thing I know more about than him, and that is new cars.
I do want to welcome the New Car Dealers, who are absolutely pivotal
in moving our province to a cleaner and greener economy as more and more
British Columbians are making that choice to buy a plug-in hybrid or a fully
electric vehicle. Today, of course, was the annual EV ride-and-drive day,
and I hope that members got out during the lunch hour to see some of the
many makes and models of electric vehicles that are available for sale at
the 400 franchise new car dealerships in 55 communities across British
Columbia.
I’m delighted to introduce some of the folks who not only serve on the
board of the New Car Dealers Association, but they also serve their
communities, supporting sports teams and community organizations and
employing thousands of people across the province.
With us today are the chair, Ann Marie Clark from Nanaimo; past chair,
Anthony Lunelli from Kelowna; Dave Bare from Parksville; James Carter from
North Vancouver; Deryl Griffith from Richmond; Mike Hacquard from Surrey;
Peter Heppner from Langley; Darren Johnson from Victoria; David Jukes from
Maple Ridge; Peter Sia from Prince George; John Wynia from Nanaimo; and last
but not least, of course, their president and CEO, Blair Qualey.
Would the House please help me make them feel very welcome.
K. Greene: Yes, I feel like I’ve won the lottery.
I’d like to introduce two people to the chambers today. One is Judia
Pelech. She was a teacher in White Rock for 38 years. She’s a constituent of
mine and a wonderful supporter.
I’d also like to introduce Savanna Pelech, her daughter-in-law, who
I’m very pleased to be able to call a friend.
Please make them welcome.
The Speaker: My apologies to the minister. Please continue.
Hon. J. Osborne: Quite all right, hon. Speaker.
I’m really pleased to introduce another set of guests today. These are
people who are making a huge difference in the lives of children and youth
and their families through their roles as educators and professionals in our
public school system. These are members of the Alberni District Teachers
Union, who work hard to advocate for the professional and personal
well-being of teachers and to influence the legislation and policies that
impact education funding, curriculum standards and classroom
conditions.
I’m grateful that they take time with me, as their MLA, to make sure
that I have the information and understanding that I need to advocate for
public education and to address the issues that are facing students and
schools in Port Alberni, Tofino, Ucluelet, Bamfield and nearby
communities.
Joining us in the gallery today we have Ryan Dvorak, who is the
president of the ADTU; Wendy Arnett, vice-president; Mark Garand, who is
president of the Ucluelet-Tofino Teachers Union, which is a sublocal of
ADTU; and Lindsay Kolba, the ADTU’s professional development committee
chair.
Would the House please join me in making them feel very
welcome.
K. Paddon: I have the pleasure of sharing that May 16 is the birthday of my
daughter Aurora. We call her Rory. She is all of the most amazing pieces of
me, and my best friend. I am so privileged to be her mom. She’s at a job
interview right now. I can’t answer my phone, but I think maybe she’s
letting me know how it went. She starts the ECE program, the dual-credit
program, next year.
I am immensely proud of how she creates and dances through life and
takes things on. She is only 17 but teaches me so, so much and is going to
be a teacher someday for elementary school.
Would the House please join me in just celebrating this amazing human
and wishing her a happy birthday.
[1:55 p.m.]
Hon. R. Kahlon: Two sets of introductions.
First, we’ve got five amazing individuals who have been working with
our government caucus this spring. They have been doing amazing
work.
I want to recognize Aza Bryson, Jiven Lal, Victor Lucy, Anna-Elaine
Rempel, Alexa Van Cuylenborg and thank them for their amazing work within
our ministries, working with our caucuses, and hope they enjoyed their time
here in the Legislature.
I also want to recognize three constituents that are here today. I’ve
got Dhaljit Singh Varaich, Sukhwinder Singh and Baldev Singh, who are
visiting from North Delta for the first time.
Can the House please join me in making them feel very
welcome.
R. Glumac: I have three introductions to do today.
First, I would like to introduce Jason Spotswood, who was a friend of
mine from my university days. It’s been almost 30 years since we’ve seen
each other. He’s disappeared off to Australia, living a wonderful life, but
he’s come back today. Would the House make him feel welcome.
My second introduction. I think the last time she was in the House was
when I surprised her with a speech that was a proposal. She’s back today.
Now there are no surprise speeches, but I want to introduce her as my wife,
because we got married on the weekend.
Would the House make her feel welcome — Haven.
And the third one. I’d like to just acknowledge that today is my son’s
birthday, Nico Glumac. He’s becoming a teenager now. He was the best man at
my wedding. Amazing little guy. He’s going to do amazing things in
life.
Happy birthday, Nico.
The Speaker: Now I’m thinking between the two ministers.
Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation.
Hon. M. Rankin: There you go.
I’d like to present to the House two long-serving public servants —
Doug Caul, who is the deputy minister in the Premier’s office; and Sarah
Plank, who for 20 years has been working in the Ministry of Indigenous
Relations, now the senior director of consultation and engagement. Both of
these individuals have worked tirelessly to bring to the House today Bill
I want the House to please make them feel welcome.
Hon. M. Farnworth: Best for last, right?
I’m honoured to introduce four members of my deputy minister’s office,
whose hard work and dedication help keep my ministry running smoothly. They
do amazing work.
I’d like the House to make most welcome Carly Parry, Alexis Di
Georgio, Katelyn Bennie and Kelsey Highsted.
Would the House please make these four dedicated public servants very
welcome.
D. Davies: I do have a couple of sets of introductions to make.
Before I read the introduction here first, the individual I’m going to
introduce and his partner, he used to be a staffer for the opposition
caucus. I better read his prepared introduction that he prepared for me, or
he might be upset if I don’t read it.
Joining us today in the public gallery is a familiar face to many of
us in this chamber. Neil Parkinson-Dow is a former legislative staffer in
the opposition caucus and now serves as a staff officer in the Canadian
Coast Guard. He is joined by his partner, Andrew George, a military musician
who plays in the navy band of the Royal Canadian Navy and who recently
placed first class at the Vancouver Island Showdown bodybuilding
competition.
Would the House please join me in welcoming them both here
today.
I know this is a bit long-winded, but my second introduction is an
interesting story. A few weeks back I walked into our office, and I saw
these two young men sitting there. I was told to introduce myself, and we
started talking. They were, I think, brought here by the Deputy Speaker or
the Assistant Deputy Speaker, two fellows from Mongolia who were just
wandering through and were very interested in our caucus and this
legislative place.
[2:00 p.m.]
Anyways, I gave them my card, and I said: “Well, if you’re ever back
in Victoria, look us up.” They arrived today and looked me up.
The two introductions are Amar-Erdene Altan Ochir — he is from
Vancouver, studying there, from Mongolia; and Tengis Luvsandorj, who lives
in Los Angeles right now, studying there. I think he’s the one who said…. He
wants to be the president of Mongolia, I think is what he told me, one
day.
Would the House please make all of our guests welcome.
J. Sims: I want to introduce and thank three amazing women. These women work in
my constituency office. As you know, when we’re away, they actually have our
backs. Not only that, their commitment to their work and their dedication,
not just during work hours, and the tremendous amount of outreach they do
into the community and their depth of knowledge about my
community.
Anyway, these three women make me look good, and I’m always so
grateful to have them back at the office. That is Mindy Bansal, Jennifer
Campbell, Pamela Sidhu, the best CAs in the whole province.
J. Rice: My apologies to my colleague. She’s been standing way longer than I
have.
Forgive me, Joan.
I have two introductions.
First, I wanted to introduce my legislative assistant, Helena
Keenliside, who does a phenomenal job of keeping me on track and on time.
Well, most of the…. Not often, okay? She has no control. I am late for
everything.
The second introduction I wanted to make was to introduce someone
who’s on the floor with us today, former MLA for North Coast Gary Coons, who
served as the MLA from 2005 until 2013. He was my predecessor. He is a
well-known, beloved community member, a former teacher of math and phys ed,
former president of the Prince Rupert and District Teachers Union. He’s a
lifelong and talented hockey player and coach, having played Junior A hockey
on to playing for the University of Western Ontario, where Coons claimed a
university league record for the most penalty minutes.
As MLA, I was very inspired by the work that he has done. I was a
tenant. I lived in his basement suite, where we became friends. I learned so
much about politics in British Columbia, which is a motivating factor for
why I’m here today. He was instrumental in helping improve the Fair Ferries
Act, lots for ferries. He pushed the government of the day to be more
accountable for the tragedies on the Highway of Tears. He has done so many
things.
I owe it to him for my place in this House. We bonded over the
expansion of open-net fish farms, which was a threat that was moving to the
north coast, to the mouth of the Skeena River. Collectively with many
others, we successfully secured a moratorium for the expansion of open-net
finfish aquaculture in the North. That’s how we bonded on the environment.
That’s why I’m here. I don’t know if to thank him or kick him for
that.
Lastly, my favourite anecdote, or one of many anecdotes, because
everyone knows he’s a joker. When Gordon Campbell was Premier, he was
visiting in Prince Rupert one time, and Gary popped up a pop-up shop out of
every meeting that he attended, every building, with his placards, trying to
do better for children in education and getting a fair deal for
teachers.
The Speaker: Thank you, Member.
J. Rice: I’m sorry for the length. Thank you.
Hon. B. Ma: I rise on a point of privilege against the comments made by the member
for Surrey-Panorama. You see, I actually have the best constituency
assistants in all of the province.
We’re joined today by Joshua Saville and Camille Mantilla in the
gallery. They do amazing work handling the correspondence for constituents,
guiding them through the numerous litany of government processes and
services available to them and, of course, helping to keep me organized and
well informed of matters going on in the community when I am doing work
here.
Will the House please join me in making them feel very
welcome.
[2:05 p.m.]
J. Phillip: Today in the House, we have with us the Downtown Eastside SRO
Collaborative, a group of tenants and organizers who are here with us today
to bear witness to the debate of Bill 27.
The SRO Collaborative is organizing peer programs in 60 of the
privately owned hotels with a goal of helping tenants gradually gain more
voice and autonomy over their homes. Their work prevents homelessness,
builds community and improves habitability and safety for the 3,500 tenants
in these privately owned hotels.
Please make them feel welcome here today.
M. Lee: I wish to join the Minister of Labour in welcoming Mr. Balbir Sahota
of Surrey to our chamber here — Mr. Sahota, good to see you — as well as Mr.
Daljit Sidhu, who is a pioneer of the Punjabi Market in South Vancouver. He
has been a great friend to the community.
Many of you know his work, as well, with the Insurance Brokers of
British Columbia, and the fact that Mr. Sidhu has done many great things in
the community to bring all of us together. He continues to talk about
multi-faith, interfaith discussions and bringing many ethnocultural
communities together and the good benefit and the support of a more
inclusive society, including in South Vancouver.
All members, please join me in welcoming Mr. Sidhu. Thank
you.
G. Begg: I rise today to introduce three guests of mine in the gallery. They
are the family of my former constituency assistant, who is now our current
caucus constituency support manager, Priyanka Krishna. Her father, Gopal,
her mother, Betty, and her aunt Shirley are visiting her now.
This family moved here to Canada in 1998 and began their journey of
becoming Canadian citizens. Before moving here, Betty was a teacher in India
and Dubai, and Gopal was a pilot and business owner. Gopal is now a retired
TransLink bus driver and a union brother. He retired after 15 years of
service. However, he still works as a tax advisor, and when he isn’t
working, he air models or helps out at their local church.
Betty is a retired child care provider. She ran her home daycare in
Burnaby for over 20 years and just had her last cohort of kids leave at the
end of the year. She now spends her time busy in her garden and her church
and community groups. Shirley is a retired head emergency nurse who, after
40 years of service, has finally come to Canada for a holiday.
Would the House please make them feel welcome.
Hon. S. Malcolmson: Mr. Speaker, allow me to introduce more people from Nanaimo who are in
the House today.
Across the way, my friend Kwul’a’sul’tun, former Chief of Snuneymuxw
First Nation, Doug White III, now special counsel to the Premier.
Also, one year ago today she joined my constituency office team in
Nanaimo, Anna Bosa. She’s here for the first time with her family-in-law,
Lynne Wilson and Kevin Banks.
Will the House please make them all very welcome.
D. Routley: Joining us today in the gallery are representatives from two
organizations on Gabriola Island: Kristina Baerg, Rob Brockley, Hugh Skinner
and Ann Landry.
The first organization is the Gabriola Land and Trails Trust, which
this year celebrates two decades of working to conserve areas of
environmental, historical and social importance on Gabriola and which has
been instrumental in developing a network of sustainable parklands and
trails throughout the island.
[2:10 p.m.]
The second, more recently established group is the Gabriola Island
Memorial Society, which was formed with the goal of establishing a green
burial and memorial park on Gabriola Island.
These two groups have partnered with the vision of creating a green
burial site surrounded by a network of trails and areas for quiet
reflection, and they are currently working together to acquire a piece of
land known as Honeysuckle Woods.
They are joined with an amazing CA, my CA, no stranger to many on both
sides of the House, Pam Cooling.
Would the House please join me in welcoming these amazing community
volunteers and my CA to the Legislature.
D. Ashton: I’ve served 11 years here, and believe it or not, I always say this is
my Victoria family. Just like my family at home, we don’t get along all the
time, but you know what, we’re still family — those past and present on the
floor. Unfortunately, I couldn’t be home today, but today my mom turns
Let’s all wish her a happy birthday.
Thank you. I really appreciate it, seriously.
Before I sit down, I have two friends — I’ve never had anybody from
Summerland — the gentleman and his lovely wife up here, Doug MacDonald and
Donna MacDonald. I grew up with Doug MacDonald. From grade 1, we’ve known
each other. Along came a beautiful lady in his life, Donna. They married,
have two wonderful children. They are both incredible teachers. Doug
finished his career as a principal. Donna taught kids with special needs and
also taught kids from the Penticton Indian Band and did a wonderful job at
it.
Could my Victoria family make the two individuals up there that I call
friends welcome, please.
The Speaker: If anybody was left out, not introduced, on behalf of all members, we
welcome you. Thank you so much for coming. I think this was the longest
introduction session on record.
Introduction and
First Reading of Bills
BILL M227 — SOCIAL WORKERS
AMENDMENT ACT,
S. Furstenau presented a bill intituled Social Workers Amendment Act,
S. Furstenau: I move that a bill intituled the Social Workers Amendment Act,
2024, be introduced and read a first time now.
Oversight, accountability and ethics are crucial to protecting the
health and safety of those working in social services and the people
they serve. While social workers are regulated across Canada, in B.C.
only a fraction are required to register with the College of Social
Workers. Those employed by the B.C. government in the Ministry of
Children and Family Development and the Ministry of Social Development
and Poverty Reduction are exempt.
This bill would amend the Social Workers Act to require all people
using the title “social worker” to hold a degree in social work and be
registered with the B.C. College of Social Workers. Properly regulating
social workers in B.C. would strengthen the profession and protect the
public. The First Nations Leadership Council and the B.C. Association of
Social Workers have long called for this change. This bill would require
all social workers to adhere to the established code of ethics and
standards of care established by the profession. It would help minimize
the risk of fraud and harm, and it would provide recourse for those
experiencing abuse in the systems, paving the way for greater trust and
accountability.
We know the problems in our social welfare systems have been
urgent and ongoing. This is one small step to improving the delivery of
services, protecting the profession and title of social worker, and most
importantly, protecting the public.
We hope the government recognizes the value of this important
legislative change.
The Speaker: Members, the question is first reading of the bill.
Motion approved.
S. Furstenau: I move the bill be placed on the orders of the day for second
reading at the next sitting of the House after today.
Bill M227, Social Workers Amendment Act, 2024, introduced, read a
first time and ordered to be placed on orders of the day for second reading
at the next sitting of the House after today.
BILL M228 — VICTIMS OF CRIME
(PUBLICATION BAN CHOICE
AND
AWARENESS) AMENDMENT ACT, 2024
K. Kirkpatrick presented a bill intituled Victims of Crime
(Publication Ban Choice and Awareness) Amendment Act, 2024.
K. Kirkpatrick: I move that a bill intituled Victims of Crime (Publication Ban
Choice and Awareness) Amendment Act, 2024, of which notice has been
given in my name on the order paper, be introduced and read for the
first time now.
I rise to address a significant oversight in our current justice
system that has left survivors of gender-based violence without the
support and rights they critically need and without their
voice.
[2:15 p.m.]
This bill I am introducing seeks to empower survivors of
gender-based violence by ensuring they are fully informed about
publication bans that might apply to their own case. This legislation is
about giving survivors the ability to make informed decisions regarding
their privacy and how their cases are discussed publicly.
It aligns with federal bill S-12, and it will mandate that all
provincial justice system personnel, including police officers, must
inform survivors if a publication ban is in place. More importantly, it
will guide survivors on how to request a variation or revocation of such
bans, giving them more control over their own personal information.
While publication bans are meant to protect victims, in many cases it
just works to protect the perpetrators.
This piece of legislation was developed in close consultation with
Jade Nielsen and her colleague Kelly, originally working with My Voice,
My Choice. It reflects the needs and recommendations directly from
survivors and those who support them daily. By amending the provincial
Victims of Crime Act, we ensure that every victim of sexual offences in
our province can have a voice and a choice in the matter of publication
bans. We have to strengthen protections for victims of gender-based
violence and defend their rights strongly.
The time to act is now. We must not delay in making these
essential changes that support victims of violence. I urge my colleagues
across the aisle to stand with me in supporting this bill and in
ensuring that our justice system is truly just and supports
survivors.
The Speaker: Members, the question is first reading of the bill.
Motion approved.
K. Kirkpatrick: I move that this bill be placed on the orders of the day for
second reading of the next sitting of the House after today.
Bill M228, Victims of Crime (Publication Ban Choice and Awareness)
Amendment Act, 2024, introduced, read a first time and ordered to be placed
on orders of the day for second reading at the next sitting of the House
after today.
Statements
(Standing Order 25B)
KIM BLACK AND CYSTIC FIBROSIS
AWARENESS AND
FUNDRAISING
M. Babchuk: May is Cystic Fibrosis Month, and I’d like to take this time to
highlight an inspirational woman in Campbell River and her remarkable
family.
Kim Black was diagnosed with CF at 16 months of age. The family
was devastated, but they weren’t just going to sit back and watch her
health decline. So they started an official
chapter of Cystic Fibrosis
Canada in Campbell River to raise awareness of the disease.
The family was very strict with Kim’s treatments at home and
travelled to the CF clinic in Vancouver every three months for
specialized care. As she got older, she spent more and more time in
hospital on IV antibiotics. She was diagnosed with CF-related diabetes
the year she graduated from school but then went on to graduate with a
bachelor of science in nursing. She worked for several years in
Vancouver, but eventually the disease worsened, and she had to
stop.
Kim works daily to maintain her level of health and continues to
raise awareness and fundraise. She’s been awarded the Courage to Come
Back Award and several CF Canada provincial and national awards in
recognition of her advocacy. Approximately six years ago, she was lucky
enough to participate in the clinical trials for Trikafta. She saw
immediate and significant improvement in her lung function and overall
health. Today she lives back in Campbell River with her family and
six-year-old son along with her husband, and she is continuing her
efforts.
The Black family and the Campbell River
chapter of Cystic Fibrosis
have raised well over $2 million from their Brind’Amour Nugent-Hopkins
Golf Classic. This year the CF Campbell River group is hosting the Walk
to Make Cystic Fibrosis History. It takes place on Sunday, May 26 at
École Willow Point Elementary School, registration at 10:30, start
walking at 11, and the Kinsmen will be doing a barbecue lunch following
the walk.
Please go to the Walk to Make Cystic Fibrosis History website,
sign up or donate.
We’ve come a long way with this disease and the treatment for CF,
but we still have no cure. Let’s make cystic fibrosis
history.
ENERGETIC COUNTY FAIR
D. Davies: The Energetic County Fair is coming back to Fort St. John for a
third year, and it’s bigger and better than ever. The three-day festival
includes performances from headlining international music stars joined
by our world-class local and regional performers that will provide music
and song from different genres and styles to provide entertainment for a
wide range of music lovers.
[2:20 p.m.]
This year’s headliners include the classic rock icon April Wine
and country music star Terri Clark. Chapel Hart is back by popular
demand. We have American Idol sensation Cameron Whitcomb; a
Bryan Adams tribute band called Reckless; an ’80s rock band, Witchazel;
and none other than our own Peace River South’s HAVEN, who will be
performing at the festival this year. It’s a great opportunity to share
the stage with big names, large audiences and to showcase the amazing
talent we have.
The festival will take place this July 18 to 20. It’s situated
just a few minutes from town in Charlie Lake. It’ll be full of vendors,
a local craft beer market, activities for kids and, of course, the 20
musical performers entertaining everyone for all three days. There’s a
campground to stay beside the fairgrounds and, of course, there will be
shuttles back and forth to Fort St. John.
Four years ago the organizer of the county fair, Dale Plourde,
moved back to Fort St. John and wanted to use his skills and background
that he had honed in Vancouver by hosting such events. And he wanted to
bring it back to the Peace region. He aimed high, and his first
Energetic County Fair was a great learning experience. By the second
year, he had sold 3,500 tickets. This year they’re well on their way to
reaching 4,500 tickets from folks right across the continent.
The festival has brought tourism dollars to the region and helps
make Fort St. John a destination for travel. It is food, art, music and
culture at its best.
Please do not miss this historical event.
DES WILSON
R. Glumac: There can be a lot of division out there in the world, and how we
handle differences of opinion says a lot about who we are.
I knew a man of incredible principle who was also one of the
kindest men I’ve ever known. Des Wilson became president of my riding
executive and was always the steady voice of calm, no matter what issue
arose. When the party he supported went forward with building Site C, he
calmly resigned on principle.
His care for the environment was uncompromising. He started early
in his career as a geologist working in the field but extended, through
his time at Douglas College, as an educator, where he started the
college’s first environmental science course with the love of his life,
Adrienne. It was there, always striving for fairness, that he reformed
the college to allow more educators to have job stability.
Later in life he turned his time to the arts. I first met Des when
I joined the board of the Port Moody Arts Centre. He was an accomplished
woodturner, and he firmly believed that art is fundamental in community.
And community is something he nurtured every day of his life, whether it
be music nights at his home or when he created an art-in-the-garden
event to bring art lovers out to visit their neighbours.
Des showed all those around him that we are all people. We all
deserve to be treated with respect. His disagreements were never
personal but always principled.
We’ll miss him, but his wisdom will carry forward in all the
people whose lives he has touched.
PRINCE GEORGE COUGARS HOCKEY TEAM
AND HEAD COACH MARK
LAMB
S. Bond: Well, it was a season for the record books, and while it didn’t
end quite the way we hoped it would, we could not be more proud of the
Prince George Cougars hockey team and organization.
I’ve been a proud supporter of the team since they arrived in
Prince George 30 seasons ago. My colleagues on this side of the aisle
certainly know that, as I rarely miss a chance to rub a little salt in
the wound when one of my local team humbles one of theirs.
As B.C. division champions, the WHL Cougars gave me plenty of
those opportunities this season. It was clear from the beginning of the
season that this was a special group of players poised to take the
Cougars to new heights. Led by league-leading goal scorer Zac Funk, of
Coldstream and rookie goaltending sensation Josh Ravensbergen of North
Vancouver, the Cougars earned a B.C. division crown and the best record
in the Western Conference.
The excitement that was building throughout the season erupted as
the playoffs began, and Prince George showed up as they always do,
selling out the CN Centre, wearing white and loudly cheering on our
team.
Through the first two rounds, the Cougars fed off the excitement
of the home crowd and defeated their opponents from Spokane and, yes,
Kelowna.
The Cougars fought hard in the Western Conference finals against
Portland, but unfortunately, the bounces did not go our way.
Despite the heartbreaking defeat, the Cougars made us all proud of
them this season. It truly was a season to remember.
[2:25 p.m.]
I want to also acknowledge the accomplishments of head coach and
general manager Mark Lamb, who won both the WHL’s Executive of the Year
and Coach of the Year awards for his tremendous success in building and
coaching this roster. And while some players will move on to
professional leagues or on to college scholarships, Coach Lamb will be
back with a strong core of returning players who will ensure that we
have lots to cheer about next season.
Thank you for an amazing hockey season.
Go, Cats, go!
ASIAN HERITAGE MONTH AND POETRY
A. Singh: May is Asian Heritage Month in British Columbia and a chance for
us to celebrate the numerous contributions Asian Canadians have made to
our province.
Poetry is the language of the heart, and I wanted to share some
poems that illustrate the diversity of talent that B.C. has given
us.
The first is “My dad cuts fruits for me.” It’s by Harman Kaur, who
now lives in the Bay area but was born right here in Abbotsford, B.C. It
speaks to undertones of discrimination that exist in stereotypes, and it
hits close to the heart, as I also cut fruits for my daughter, Leni, and
she’s the absolute centre of my life.
Where my parents come from,
the men do not lift a finger
in the kitchen,
but my dad cuts fruits for me.
My people prefer
to have sons over daughters,
but my dad cuts fruits for
me.
Punjabi dads are supposed to be cold and removed from their
daughters,
but my dad cuts fruits for me.
Daughters are going to
leave one day and go to their real homes,
but my dad cuts fruits for
me.
The second is by my friend Rita Wong, who is an accomplished poet
and well-known environmentalist and teaches in the critical and cultural
studies program at Emily Carr University. It’s “Q’élstexw.” I hope I get
that right. It’s Halq’eméylem.
stubborn
Halq’eméylem springs up
among the newspaper boxes and mail
receptacles
in the shade of the thqa:t
along the
sidewalks lined with grass and pta:kwem
waiting to grow
anywhere they can
around the supermarkets full of transported food
kwukemels , tomatoes, chocolate and chicken
under
the wet green shelter of chestnut and p’xwelhp
leaves
carried on the tricky wings of skwówéls ,
also
known as qukin , gaak , gwawis ,
setsé7
and more in the languages of this land
more to
tree & bracken & cucumber & oak & raven
than meets
the stiff I
root & stomach & seed speak glottal, gut &
gift
return
CENTRAL OKANAGAN CRIME STOPPERS
B. Stewart: Imagine a quiet evening in the heart of the Central Okanagan.
Families are gathered around dinner tables. Children are playing in
their yards. The tranquility of our community seems
unbreakable.
But suddenly the pieces shatter. A masked figure storms into a
local convenience store, demanding cash and other valuables. Fear grips
the hearts of the innocent bystanders, and the sense of security that
once enveloped our community is threatened.
In the face of chaos, our story takes a turn. As the perpetrator
flees into the night, a concerned citizen, witnessing the crime from a
safe distance, picks up their phone. They call a number that has become
the beacon of hope in our community, the number for the Central Okanagan
Crime Stoppers. This call sets off a chain of events that will ensure
justice is served and peace is restored.
For over 37 years, the Central Okanagan Crime Stoppers has been a
cornerstone of community safety. Staffed by two dedicated individuals,
the program has processed over 32,600 tips, recovering over $94 million
in stolen goods and drugs and clearing thousands of cases.
The Central Okanagan Crime Stoppers Society, with its dynamic
board, spearheads fundraising and educational initiatives that further
empower our residents. There are innovative approaches, including Make
Bail — admittedly something that I’ve been arrested for and had to make
bail; bike safety rodeos; the integration of the Project 529 app; and
actively advancing crime prevention.
The Central Okanagan Crime Stoppers doesn’t merely respond to
threats; they proactively prevent and dismantle them, safeguarding our
community and tranquility and ensuring a legacy of safety for
generations to come.
[2:30 p.m.]
Oral Questions
CANCER CARE SERVICES AND
HOSPITAL PROJECT IN
SURREY
K. Falcon: This Premier promised the people of B.C. results that people could
see, feel and touch. Well, the results are in. Health care outcomes in
this province have never been worse than they are today.
Shocking new documents obtained by the opposition reveal that
Surrey patients suffer the longest cancer treatment delays in the
province. The documents also reveal: “Today B.C. cancer system capacity
is insufficient to meet patient needs, and in Surrey, only 42 percent of
new patients see an oncologist within the clinically recommended time
frame.”
My question to the Premier: cancer is a disease that doesn’t wait.
After years of promising results, why has this Premier failed to deliver
better results for cancer patients in Surrey?
Hon. A. Dix: It’s why, in B.C., we’re on a ten-year cancer plan; why last year
we added, across British Columbia, 92 new cancer doctors; why we’ve
increased investments; and why in Surrey, at a hospital in Cloverdale
that the Leader of the Opposition, a former MLA for Cloverdale,
opposed…. You can’t go home again, I guess. He opposed.
We’re ensuring that Surrey will have two cancer centres, to ensure
that the growing size of Surrey and the growing demand for cancer
treatment in Surrey are reflected by the resources in the
system.
The Speaker: Leader of the Official Opposition, supplemental.
K. Falcon: Well, this is the same NDP government that is currently sending
cancer patients to the United States of America, to the evil private
health care system that they always decry. Why? It’s because they can’t
deliver basic radiation treatments here in British Columbia.
The fact of the matter is that the last time this ever happened in
British Columbia was the last time the NDP were in power. It is
literally a self-created crisis.
Let’s be clear. It is under this NDP government that cancer care
wait times in Surrey have become the worst in the province. The member
mentions the second hospital. For seven long years, the NDP has been
promising Surrey a new full-service hospital. Instead, residents will
get a shockingly inadequate facility that is already $1.2 billion over
budget and three years behind its scheduled construction
start.
New freedom-of-information documents reveal that this inadequate
168-bed facility is projected to be way over capacity before the doors
even open. The clinical services plan admits that the entire facility,
along with the operating rooms and procedure rooms, will be outdated and
inefficient years before a single patient even walks through the
doors.
My question to the minister, since the Premier won’t answer any
questions: with skyrocketing costs and endless delays, when will this
government end this disastrous NDP mismanagement and actually deliver
the full-service hospital Surrey desperately needs?
Hon. A. Dix: A lot of people can ask legitimate questions about health care,
but the person who decided to sell the land for Surrey’s second hospital
to a Liberal donor…. Yes, there should be a second hospital today, and
they sold the land. They sold the land.
We need more medical professionals in British Columbia. We’re
building a new medical school in Surrey with SFU. Who stopped that from
happening when he was Minister of Health, Minister of Finance? The
Leader of the Opposition.
Interjections.
The Speaker: Shhh, Members.
Hon. A. Dix: We’re building a cardiac catheterization lab in Surrey. A new
renal centre in Surrey is being built now as the hospital is being
built.
Interjection.
The Speaker: Member.
Hon. A. Dix: We’ve added, at Surrey Memorial Hospital — 180 positions, full
new positions at Surrey Memorial Hospital; a new urgent and primary care
centre in Newton; a new urgent and primary care centre in North Surrey.
The list goes on and on. There is more investment in health care in
Surrey than ever before.
[2:35 p.m.]
The contrast with a political party on the opposite side, which
sold out Surrey and sold their land for the hospital, could not be more
stark.
T. Halford: Only this NDP government can continually overpromise and
underdeliver when it comes to health care, especially in
Surrey.
Interjections.
The Speaker: Shhh, Members.
T. Halford: After seven years of broken NDP promises, we are still waiting. By
2030, this project will have dragged on for 13 years since it was first
announced. Worse yet, 168 beds, no ICU, no maternity ward, no pediatric
care — 13 years, and they can’t even deliver that.
If someone suffers a heart attack or has a serious illness just a
block away, are they going to go there? No, they’re not, because it’s a
triage centre for minor treatments. This is all confirmed in FOI
documents. The minister should know that, and he should be transparent
in this House when he stands up to answer a question.
Why does the Premier continue to fail Surrey with inadequate and
delayed half-measures instead of giving Surrey a full-service hospital
that they deserve?
Hon. A. Dix: It’s the new Surrey hospital and cancer centre. They stand up, and
they ask a question about cancer. Surrey will be the only community in
B.C., the only one with two cancer centres. Why? It’s going to be our
largest community — our fastest-growing population, our fastest-growing
seniors population over the next 15 years.
Cancer is today the leading cause of death in Surrey.
Interjection.
Hon. A. Dix: Well, hon. Speaker, they may be opposed. I know they’re opposed to
a new cancer centre in Surrey. They’re opposed to a second hospital in
Surrey. They’re opposed to the medical school in Surrey. They’re opposed
to the new tower at Surrey Memorial Hospital. They’re opposed to urgent
and primary care centres.
Interjections.
The Speaker: Members, shhh. Members.
Hon. A. Dix: They’re opposed to new MRI machines, and they’re opposed to the
cardiac catheterization lab, but we are delivering all those, and we’re
going to continue to deliver them.
The Speaker: Surrey–White Rock, supplemental.
T. Halford: The minister wants to get up in this House and talk about cancer
care in Surrey? Well, let me tell him about a constituent.
A gentleman goes in and is diagnosed with cancer in January. He
can’t get in to see his oncologist. When he finally gets in, they tell
him: “We can operate, and we can get rid of the cancer.” In April, he
goes in and spends three days in Surrey Memorial, in the hallway by the
ambulance bay, where his wife has to bring him in a blanket and a pillow
because he’s freezing.
At the end of that visit, the doctor comes and tells him: “We’re
sorry. Your cancer has progressed. There is nothing more that we can
do.” He’s telling him that story in a loading bay in a hallway at Surrey
Memorial Hospital. That is this minister’s record when it comes to
cancer care in Surrey.
This new, promised hospital is already $1.22 billion over budget
and three years behind schedule, and we know it’s disastrously
undersized. With such obvious gaps, this hospital is full before it even
opens.
When will the Premier take responsibility, fix these major
failures caused by this minister and actually give us a project and a
hospital Surrey deserves?
Hon. A. Dix: In every case, when people raise cases to my attention…. Members
know this. We consider every case important, in the health care system,
and we act that way.
One of the ways you deal with that in the future is to have a
health human resources plan that leads the country, which we do. We were
sixth in family doctors per capita when I became Minister of Health.
We’re first now. We’ve got to do more. We’ve led Canada in new
registered nurses over the last seven years. We were, of course, tenth
in that category when I became Minister of Health — which would be great
if there were 100 provinces.
We have invested in health sciences professionals who are needed
to support diagnostic care across our health care system. Working with
the Health Sciences Association, working with the Doctors of B.C.,
working with doctors in Surrey and everywhere else, we are delivering
the most effective health human resources in our country, and we are
going to continue to deliver.
Interjections.
The Speaker: Members.
[2:40 p.m.]
Hon. A. Dix: Hon. Speaker, the facts are the facts. The only time….
Interjections.
The Speaker: Members. Members.
Member for Surrey South.
The minister will continue.
Hon. A. Dix: Thank you, hon. Speaker.
Yes, we are building a second hospital in Surrey. Yes, we are
building a new tower at Surrey Memorial Hospital. Yes, we are building a
Surrey medical school. Yes, we’re building a cardiac catheterization
lab. Yes, we’re building a new renal centre. Yes, we’re adding to
maternity care at Surrey Memorial Hospital. Yes, we’re adding primary
care in Surrey. We’re going to continue to do that because we put
patients first, on this side of the House. We put patients first on this
side of the House.
Interjections.
The Speaker: Shhh, Members. Members.
Hon. A. Dix: When they decided to sell out Surrey patients, sell out Surrey
patients and sell off the land for a hospital, they put Surrey back ten
years. We’re putting it back on the right track.
WILD SALMON POPULATION
AND HABITAT
PROTECTION
A. Olsen: SĆÁÁNEW̱ , salmon, are
the backbone of this province. They’ve nourished the land, the economies
and cultures of these territories for thousands of years. Despite their
importance, the draft ecosystem health and biodiversity framework did
not include wild salmon or recognize the urgent need to stem land use
activities that degrade and destroy salmon habitat.
The province once celebrated salmon, dedicating a panel in the
rotunda just outside here to this iconic species and the industry. But
habitat loss, overfishing, logging in watersheds, fish farms and climate
change have pushed salmon stocks to the brink of collapse.
My question is to the Premier. When he decides to replace that
mural out there in that rotunda, the wild Pacific salmon mural, will he
replace it with a fracking rig and the massive welded pipes or a
hellscape of wildfires and hungry, thirsty British
Columbians?
Hon. G. Heyman: I would hope the member would realize that this government has put
significant work into rehabilitating habitat for wild salmon, into
taking measures to protect wild salmon. I want to pay particular tribute
to the Parliamentary Secretaries for Fisheries and Aquaculture, as well
as for Watershed Restoration.
The member should know that we are developing a wild salmon
strategy. The member does know that we are developing a watershed
security strategy and fund. The member should know — I’m sure does know
— that we had a healthy watersheds initiative, and that we continue to
take action to rehabilitate wild salmon stocks, to protect them, to work
with First Nations to accomplish that.
There are a range of initiatives under my colleague, the Minister
of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship that are designed to do just
that.
The Speaker: Member, supplemental.
A. Olsen: What I do know is that it’s clear that this government is
strapping all their environmental woes to the former head of the Sierra
Club, on his way out of this place.
My dad, ZȺWIZUT, Carl Olsen,
successfully defended his Douglas treaty hunting and fishing rights
against this province in the Supreme Court of Canada. He’s actively
protesting a plan to build a highway on top of Goldstream, our critical
salmon habitat pushed to the brink by both deforestation and increased
traffic, standing each Tuesday with his signs and his allies,
ZȺWIZUT now defends the trees
that provide cover to the spawning beds.
This is the story of so many creeks, streams and rivers in this
province that would be lucky to have a
ZȺWIZUT standing in their
defence. We wonder where our salmon are. Instead of slowing traffic down
through the park or modifying human behaviour like the hundreds of
drivers mindlessly texting as they speed past
ZȺWIZUT, it’s the salmon who are
going to pay the price.
To the Premier, with the fishing industry all but extirpated in
this province from this B.C. economy, will the Premier lease that mural
space out there depicting the fishing industry to the fossil fuel
lobbyists for advertising so that the Minister of Energy can be very
clear who’s calling the shots and so that the visitors of this place
will know exactly what the members of this House have done to a once
glorious industry in this province?
Hon. G. Heyman: Every member on this side of the House knows how important wild
salmon are to the people of this province and to the First Nations who
have lived here for millennia and their people. We have heard that
directly from the nations with whom we meet. I heard that as recently as
yesterday.
[2:45 p.m.]
We are in the midst of an overarching project to ensure that we
look at things holistically. Whether it’s changing the parameters of the
Forest Act to put ecosystem health first, whether it’s ensuring that
land use planning is integrated in the Ministry of Water, Land and
Resource Stewardship and that we bring together a wild salmon strategy,
watershed security strategy and a coastal restoration strategy, we are
taking actions because the way that we’ve done things in the past just
did not work.
You cannot make decision by decision in isolation and expect to
protect the ecosystems on which we depend. We’re changing the paradigm.
We’re working hard at it. There are a number of people on this side of
the House who work together on that and will continue to do that
work.
BUILDING CODE ENERGY REGULATIONS
FOR NEW HOUSING
UNITS
B. Banman: When looking for a new home, how many B.C. families say: “Gee, I
really hope our next home has tiny windows, poor airflow, a bad layout
and also cost 30 percent more”? My bet is none. Not a one. But this is
exactly what this NDP government is doing with a pile of NDP red tape
called the step code. This NDP Premier’s red tape is forcing builders to
build dark, stuffy homes that cost way more.
My question to the Minister of Housing: why is this NDP government
punishing B.C. families struggling to find a new home with red tape that
makes new homes less livable and less affordable?
Hon. R. Kahlon: No doubt people across British Columbia — in fact, across the
country — are struggling to find affordable housing.
I’m pleased to hear the B.C. Conservatives, for the first time,
ask a question about housing. I’m pleased to see that they’ve got some
interest in this important topic. We have been taking steps to increase
the amount of housing, different types of housing, available for British
Columbians.
The member, I’m sure, knows that last session, we brought in a
whole host of legislation to ensure that we can get more types of
housing being built, cutting red tape so that decisions can be made
faster. He opposed it all. He opposed all of it.
To the member’s question about building code, the building code is
an important piece to ensure that when a home is built and someone has
the opportunity to own that home for a long time, it is built at a high
standard. Surely the member is not talking about getting rid of codes so
that there is no certainty for anyone buying a home whether their home
is going to last them a long time.
The member should be aware that we had a situation recently that
was canvassed by the official opposition, not by the Conservative Party,
in this House, when we were talking about a project that had people in
Langford having to be evicted from their brand new home because the
project didn’t meet basic code. That’s what’s at risk if you compromise
the building code in British Columbia.
So yes, we want housing for people. Yes, we want affordable
housing. But we will not compromise safety in any way.
The Speaker: House Leader of the Fourth Party, supplemental.
B. Banman: This NDP Premier’s CleanBC plan states that B.C. will mandate the
most extreme level of step code, net-zero-ready, for every new home in
B.C. by 2032. Right now, this NDP Premier is letting NDP-aligned
municipal politicians mandate net-zero insanity today in the middle of a
housing crisis.
Interjections.
The Speaker: Let’s hear the question.
B. Banman: This is yet another example of how this NDP Premier and NDP
government has zero common sense.
My question….
Interjections.
The Speaker: Members. Members. The Member for Abbotsford South has the floor,
please.
Please continue.
B. Banman: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
My question to the Minister of Housing: Minister, can you please
tell this House why you think it is a good idea to have policies that
jack up construction costs and force B.C. families to live in dark,
narrow homes with tiny windows and less fresh air?
The Speaker: Through the Chair, Member.
Minister.
[2:50 p.m.]
Hon. R. Kahlon: Thank you, hon. Speaker. Every time I stand up to answer a
question from the member, it seems to get a little more bizarre every
single time. Surely the member is not advocating for us to build homes
that are not safe for people over the long term. Surely that’s not what
he’s advocating for.
I looked for the housing policy of the B.C. Conservatives and just
found empty pages and random rhetoric, and that’s what we’re hearing
here today.
I think it’s important for anyone that’s buying a home to know,
when they buy that home, that it’s up to the highest standards, that
it’s built to the highest standards, that it has got energy efficiency.
They may have bought the home, but then the cost to maintain the home is
so high.
I know it’s hard for the member to understand. He doesn’t believe
climate change is real, so I appreciate that it’s hard for him to
understand why we focus on sustainability. But when people buy homes, we
want to make sure that not only can they afford their first home, but
also that the costs to operate that home are the lowest
possible.
We’re going to continue to do that work. If he has any thoughtful
or helpful suggestions, those would always be welcome, but I don’t think
he has any of those.
GOVERNMENT ACTION ON REPEAT
OFFENDERS AND CRIME IN
COMMUNITIES
E. Sturko: Eighteen months ago the Premier promised safer communities, saying
that the big indicator is “when British Columbians feel safer.” That
promise is utterly broken.
Today nobody feels safe. Just days ago on Commercial Drive, a
young mother breastfeeding her four-month-old baby was violently
assaulted in her car by a stranger, who then attempted to grab her baby.
This is someone that was already known to police. This is a person who
was making and posting videos online about killing women, yet he was
allowed to roam the streets and attack a breastfeeding
mother.
My question is: when will the Premier stop enabling prolific
offenders and put the rights of victims ahead of an offender’s right to
reoffend?
Hon. M. Farnworth: I appreciate the question and, obviously, share the same concern
when a case like this is raised.
It’s why this government has and continues to take action on the
public safety front. That’s why we have in place the safer communities
action plan that has given additional resources for police to be able to
deal with repeat violent offenders, a program that we put in place and
have given permanent funding to, a program which once existed, when they
sat on this side of the House, and that they cancelled.
It’s why we’ve pushed for bail reform so that we can ensure that
those who are a risk in terms of being violent can be denied bail and
kept off the streets. It was this government that led that initiative to
get that expanded so that it wasn’t just about firearms, but it was
about people who use violence, whether it be knives or other
weapons.
We will continue to work with local governments. We will continue
to work with police. We will continue to work with the federal
government to make the changes necessary to the Criminal Code to help
keep our communities safe.
The Speaker: Surrey South, supplemental.
E. Sturko: I have heard minister after minister today answering questions by
standing up and talking about programs, talking about promises, but
never taking responsibility for their results. These are their
results.
The NDP Premier promised. He promised that people would feel safer
in their communities, and 18 months later, nothing could be further from
the truth. We have an escalating gang conflict, random stabbings, social
disorder and rampant taxpayer-funded drug trafficking. Violent crimes
have increased 37 percent under this soft-on-crime Premier’s
catch-and-release policies.
My question: why has the Premier failed to deliver the safe
communities he promised?
Hon. M. Farnworth: Again, I appreciate the question from the member.
One of the things that we always want to do is to ensure that we
have a good understanding of statistics. I can inform the member, for
example, that in Delta, violent crime is down over the last three years
by 9 percent, robberies down by 71 percent, other offences by persons
down 28 percent. That’s not just unique to Delta.
Prince George, bike theft down 83 percent.
Interjections.
[2:55 p.m.]
The Speaker: Continue.
Hon. M. Farnworth: They proclaim to be concerned about public safety. I’ve just read
out statistics from a community in Delta around assaults and violent
assaults against people showing a downward trend.
Now, there are other things that they have raised in the past
about theft. Again, I’m pointing out that in the case of Prince George,
bike theft is down 83 percent, break and enters are down 19 percent, and
mischief under $5,000 is down 8 percent.
In Kamloops, overall crime is down 2 percent, breaking and
entering in businesses is down, and theft of motor vehicles is down 18
percent.
The reality is that the initiatives that this government has put
in place are tools that police have asked for. That’s why we’ve made a
push for changes to the Criminal Code. That’s why we’ve put in place the
ReVOII program for repeat violent offenders. That’s why we’ve put in
place the SITE funding, special investigative funding that communities
across this province and police have been praising.
The Speaker: Thank you. Thank you, Minister.
Hon. M. Farnworth: We are going to do everything we can to keep communities safe, and
it’s working.
CRIME IN COMMUNITIES AND
GANG ACTIVITY IN
KAMLOOPS
T. Stone: Well, tell that to the young mother who was breastfeeding her
four-month-old and was violently assaulted by a stranger. Nobody
believes this minister. He can rattle off all the statistics that he
wants to. The fact of the matter is that the results on crime are
terrible.
In Kamloops, we have an open gang war and unchecked violence, with
five brazen shootings over four days. The RCMP have issued unprecedented
warnings telling people in Kamloops to watch out for flying bullets in
broad daylight in neighbourhoods across our city, from the south shore
to the north shore. Parents are, frankly, terrified to let their
children play outside, fearing that any street could become the next
gang battleground.
My question to the Premier is this. Why has this soft-on-crime
Premier so badly failed to protect so many communities, leaving people
in cities like Kamloops fearing for their safety?
Hon. M. Farnworth: I heard the comment from the Leader of the Opposition, which once
again illustrates just how little he really does take public safety in
the province of British Columbia. What I can tell….
Interjection.
Hon. M. Farnworth: The member says he doesn’t care about bike theft. Tell that to a
kid who worked really hard to earn money to save for a bike. He says he
doesn’t care if the bike gets stolen. That is shameful.
Interjections.
The Speaker: Members. Members, shhh. Shhh.
Members.
Hon. M. Farnworth: In the case of the gang activity in Kamloops, what I can tell the
hon. member is that police have devoted significant resources in terms
of…. The gang enforcement unit is up in Kamloops. They are providing
additional resources to police on the street. The warning that was put
out was put out deliberately in terms of two individuals. A number of
arrests have been made already, and there’s a surge of resources into
that community.
It’s one of the reasons why this side of the House put in place
the first witness security program so that police have the tools and
resources they need to be able to deal with gang violence. It’s why we
just announced the creation of the new integrated gang homicide team,
which brings together resources to focus specifically on gang
activity.
We’re putting in place the resources that communities have asked
for. We’re putting in place the resources, the tools, that police have
asked for. We will continue to do that to keep communities
safe.
The Speaker: Opposition House Leader, supplemental.
T. Stone: The recent announcement from the minister, devoting some resources
to a new integrated gang homicide team, made very clear that this team
does not provide resources to anywhere outside of the Lower Mainland.
It’s to disrupt gang activity in the Lower Mainland.
The minister and this government have forgotten that there’s
actually gang activity taking place all across the province. Our beef is
not with the RCMP in Kamloops. It’s not with the hard-working men and
women in the police that are doing their jobs. Our beef is with this
minister, who’s not doing his job.
[3:00 p.m.]
Now, 18 months ago it was this NDP Premier who again promised that
people would feel safe in their communities. Yet in Kamloops, in
addition to this unprecedented gang activity that’s taking place, this
gang warfare, there are continuous residential break-ins from repeat
offenders that have left residents in the Dufferin, Pineview and
Brocklehurst neighbourhoods of Kamloops feeling terrorized and
helpless.
Known criminals are brazenly entering homes and stealing property.
They’re facing no consequences under this Premier’s catch-and-release
policies. Residents have had to go to the extreme lengths of
establishing their own community patrols out of sheer
desperation.
My question again to the minister is this. When will this
soft-on-crime Premier stop prioritizing the rights of repeat offenders
over the rights of honest, hard-working, law-abiding citizens to be safe
in their homes and in their neighbourhoods?
Hon. M. Farnworth: I appreciate the question from the member.
This government takes
public safety in the communities extremely seriously. That’s why, since
the very beginning, our plan was to put in place a witness security
program to allow the RCMP to solve many of the kinds of violent,
difficult types of crimes that have taken place that the member refers
to, something that they failed to do when they sat on this side of the
House.
That’s why we funded sexual assault centres, unlike the cuts that
were made when they sat on this side of the House. That’s why this side
of the House put in place the repeat violent offender program, the
ReVOII program, which used to be a program which they cut when they sat
on this side of the House.
That’s why we’ve spent more than $230 million on hiring 277 RCMP
officers…
Interjections.
The Speaker: Shhh, Members.
Hon. M. Farnworth: …something they could have done, again, which they failed to
do.
Interjections.
The Speaker: Members. Members.
Minister.
Hon. M. Farnworth: Thank you, hon. Speaker.
Major crime unit impacts Kamloops. Highway patrol impacts
Kamloops. Small rural communities that surround Kamloops are benefiting
from those investments. The freeing up of resources around IHIT, because
of the creation of the new gang homicide unit helps Kamloops. We have
put significant resources into communities right across the program. The
site fund….
Interjections.
The Speaker: Members, let the minister conclude.
Hon. M. Farnworth: The only thing missing in action on public safety was that side of
the House when they sat on this side of the House. They all made cuts.
We make investments, and we’re going to continue to do that.
[End of question period.]
Petitions
P. Milobar: I have a petition on behalf of the Kamloops white cane club asking
that all residents, seniors and persons with disabilities in B.C. have free
access to eye exams through their own registered optometrist. These user
fees charged by the optometrists will cause hardship and do cause hardship
on our seniors and persons with disabilities. They consider this to be a
preventative measure for health care down the road, and they’ve managed to
collect quite a few signatures…
The Speaker: Thank you.
P. Milobar: …in just a short period of time to make it in before the end of this
sitting.
M. Lee: I rise to table two petitions.
The first petition is on behalf of 425 residents, to date, calling for
new and improved transit services in South Vancouver. The petition states
that with new home-building projects that are reshaping our community and
with them, the need for improved public transit has never been more needed.
With 32 percent of South Vancouver residents, including in Marpole, relying
on transit, among the highest in Vancouver, the services are being
overstretched. Despite the rapidly growing community, transit services lag
far behind.
The petition calls for introducing a new bus service on 57th Avenue,
rapid transit supports on 41st and 49th avenues and a new Canada Line
station…
The Speaker: Thank you.
M. Lee: …at 33rd and 57th avenues. With that, I table these 425
petitions.
The second petition I’d like to table…. This petition is provided by
5,900 concerned B.C. parents and others who have signed this petition,
including constituents of mine in Vancouver-Langara. They are petitioning
and opposing the BCTF motion that was passed back in March of 2024 to lobby
the Ministry of Education and Child Care to add Nakba and the military
occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip to the curriculum.
[3:05 p.m.]
The petition calls on the Ministry of Education and Child Care to
outright reject this proposal. The BCTF motion is seeking to bring
polarizing and isolating political agenda into our classrooms. That’s what
the petitioners are concerned about, creating a hostile learning environment
and targeting and marginalizing particular students or groups.
D. Routley: I rise to present a petition. This petition…
Interjections.
The Speaker: Shhh.
The member will continue, please.
D. Routley: …is signed by 1,182 residents of Gabriola. That represents
approximately 25 percent of the population of the island. They seek the
opportunity to acquire 40 acres known as Honeysuckle Woods for a green
burial memorial park.
Reports from Committees
FINANCE AND GOVERNMENT
SERVICES
COMMITTEE
M. Starchuk: I am pleased to present the first report of the Select Standing
Committee on Finance and Government Services for the fifth session of
the 42nd parliament entitled Interim Report on Statutory
Offices .
I move that the report be taken and read as received.
Motion approved.
M. Starchuk: I ask for leave of the House to move a motion to adopt the
report.
Leave granted.
The Speaker: Please continue.
M. Starchuk: In moving adoption of the report, I’d like to make some brief
comments. This report summarizes the committee’s discussions with the
province’s nine statutory officers at the spring update meetings. It is
our committee’s responsibility to exercise…
Interjections.
The Speaker: Shhh.
M. Starchuk: …general oversight of the statutory officers. As part of this
work, every spring we meet with the statutory officers to receive
financial and operational updates.
The report also includes our recommendations on several
supplementary funding requests that we received during these meetings.
These requests resulted from legislative changes, project delays,
workload pressures and inflationary cost pressures.
The committee recognizes that some of these budgetary impacts were
not known to the offices when they prepared their budget proposals last
fall. However, the committee continues to emphasize the importance of
accurate budgeting and forecasting, and requesting supplementary funding
only in exceptional or extenuating circumstances.
On behalf of the committee and all the members of the Legislative
Assembly, I extend my appreciation to all the statutory officers and
their staff for the important work that they undertake in support of the
members of the Legislative Assembly and all British
Columbians.
I would also like to acknowledge and extend our appreciation to
the staff of the Parliamentary Committees Office for the support that
they provide to our committee, including Katey Stickle, Mary Heeg,
Jonathon Hamilton, Danielle Migeon, Mary Newell and Alexa
Neufeld.
Our appreciation also goes out to the Hansard staff who supported
the long hours of the committee, including Amanda Heffelfinger, Dwight
Schmidt and Danielle Suter.
I want to make special thanks to Jennifer Arril, who makes the
work that I have to do so much easier on a daily basis.
I’d like to take this opportunity to thank all the committee
members: in alphabetical order, the members for Cariboo North,
Courtenay-Comox, Kelowna West, Langford–Juan de Fuca, North
Vancouver–Seymour, Powell River–Sunshine Coast and Richmond South
Centre.
I’d also like to take this opportunity to thank the Deputy Chair,
the member for Kootenay East, for the support and dedication in the work
of this committee.
T. Shypitka: I would also like to extend my gratitude to committee members,
including the Chair, the member for Surrey-Cloverdale, for their
collaboration and diligent work on this committee.
This year during the spring check-in meetings, the committee
requested that each office speak to their workplace culture and the
respectful workplace policies and procedures they have in place. The
committee appreciates those offices that have implemented a fulsome
approach to ensuring a healthy workplace for staff and looks forward to
further updates in this area.
The committee also recognizes the significant work that statutory
officers perform for British Columbians and recognizes the efforts of
many statutory offices to engage with Indigenous, newcomer and ethnic
each office provides.
[3:10 p.m.]
Finally, I would like to echo the comments from the member for
Surrey-Cloverdale and extend a thank-you to the staff from the
Parliamentary Committees Office and Hansard Services, who have helped
the committee in its work.
The Speaker: Members, the question is adoption of the report.
Motion approved.
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONER
APPOINTMENT
COMMITTEE
J. Phillip: I have the opportunity to present the report of the Special
Committee to Appoint a Human Rights Commissioner.
I move that the report be taken and read as received.
The Speaker: Members, the question is that the report be taken and read as
received.
Motion approved.
J. Phillip: I ask leave of the House to move a motion to adopt the
report.
Leave granted.
J. Phillip: I move that the report be adopted and, in doing so, I would like
to share some of the remarks about our work.
I am pleased to share that this report contains the committee’s
unanimous recommendation that Kasari Govender be reappointed as B.C.’s
Human Rights Commissioner for an additional five-year term.
When our committee began our work in January, we learned that the
incumbent Human Rights Commissioner, Kasari Govender, was interested in
serving for a second term. We carefully considered her qualifications,
her experience and her achievements during her first term as
commissioner. After interviewing Ms. Govender, we reached our unanimous
recommendation.
Ms. Govender was appointed as British Columbia’s first independent
Human Rights Commissioner only six months before the start of the
COVID-19 pandemic and faced challenging circumstances while setting up a
new statutory office. The committee was impressed with her work to build
and operationalize the organization, which now has almost 40
staff.
As commissioner, Ms. Govender has provided strong leadership to
the office. We appreciated her focus on authenticity and creating a
respectful and equitable work environment, and value her dedication to
fairness, equality and compassion. In her first term, Ms. Govender
successfully led a range of inquiries, interventions in court cases and
education and research activities. She also demonstrated a commitment to
building relationships and credibility with Indigenous Nations and
communities, government, media and other diverse organizations and
community groups.
The committee particularly appreciated Ms. Govender’s pragmatic
approach and focus on ensuring that her office’s work leads to concrete
improvements in human rights in British Columbia. Ms. Govender had
dedicated herself to advancing and advocating for human rights
throughout her career. Given her expertise and her accomplishments in
her first term, we are confident that she will continue to do excellent
work promoting and protecting human rights upon her
reappointment.
I understand that Ms. Govender is in the House, in the gallery
today, and she’s joined by her son. I would ask that all members join me
in congratulating our recommendation for her reappointment. On behalf of
all members of the House, I’d like to sincerely express our gratitude to
Ms. Govender for her commitment to serve in British Columbia.
[3:15 p.m.]
I would like to thank all the committee members for their
collaborative spirit and commitment to this important work, and
particularly Brittny Anderson, Ravi Parmar, MLA Teresa Wat and
particularly Norm Letnick, who is our Deputy Chair. I thank him for his
leadership.
I would like to ask the House to move a motion that Kasari
Govender be appointed as Human Rights Commissioner. Oh,
sorry.
The Speaker: Thank you, Member. Take a seat. We are not finished
yet.
N. Letnick: Thank you to the Chair for her comments.
I’d like to concur that Ms. Kasari Govender has demonstrated a
commitment to upholding human rights throughout her career. The
committee, unanimously, is confident she will continue to be an
effective Human Rights Commissioner during her second term.
In particular, I want to thank all the Clerk staff, Hansard staff
that worked with us during this process and, of course, the members for
Richmond North Centre, Langford–Juan de Fuca, Nelson-Creston; and our
fabulous, very flexible and open-minded Chair, the member for
Vancouver–Mount Pleasant.
The Speaker: Members, the question is adoption of the report.
Motion approved.
Motions Without Notice
APPOINTMENT OF
HUMAN RIGHTS
COMMISSIONER
J. Phillip: I ask leave of the House to move a motion that Kasari Govender,
KC, be appointed as Human Rights Commissioner.
Leave granted.
J. Phillip: I move:
[That Kasari Govender, K.C., be reappointed as Human Rights
Commissioner for one additional five-year term, effective September 3,
2024, pursuant to
section 47.01 of the Human Rights Code
(R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 210)]
The Speaker: Members, you’ve heard the question.
Motion approved.
The Speaker: On behalf of all the members of this Legislative Assembly, I want
to congratulate the commissioner on accepting her second
term.
We really want to say thank you, and we appreciate your service to
British Columbia. Thank you so much.
Tabling Documents
G. Chow: I have the honour to present a report entitled Report on the
Administration of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy
Act .
Petitions
S. Chandra Herbert: I rise to present a petition to remove the additional rent increases
for capital expenditures, Residential Tenancy Regulation
section 23.1, ARIC,
signed by 756 British Columbians, respectfully requesting that the
honourable House repeal regulation 23.1 in its entirety because of
significant, disproportionate negative impact on renters in B.C.
Orders of the Day
Hon. R. Kahlon: I call Motion 33 on the order paper.
Government Motions on Notice
MOTION 33 — COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
TO SIT IN
SECTION
Hon. R. Kahlon: I move Motion 33, standing in my name on the order paper, which
seeks to enable
Section C to consider bills at committee
stage:
[That the Sessional Order adopted by the House on March 4, 2024,
enabling certain proceedings of the House to be undertaken in three
sections, be amended by
a. adding the underlined text in
section 6, as
follows: “Section C be authorized to examine all Estimates and any
public bill appearing on the Orders of the Day at committee
stage , which may be considered in the order determined by the
Government House Leader in accordance with Standing Order 27 (2).”
and,
b. adding the underlined text in
section 12, as
follows: “The Members of
Section C be: the Minister whose Estimates are
under examination or who is in charge of the bill under consideration
and Michele Babchuk, Hon. Adrian Dix, Hon. Mike Farnworth, Hon.
Rob Fleming, Hon. Bruce Ralston, Hon. Rachna Singh, Norm Letnick,
Coralee Oakes, Tom Shypitka, Adam Olsen and Bruce
Banman .”]
Motion approved.
Hon. R. Kahlon: In this chamber, I call third reading for Bill 25, Haida Nation
Recognition Amendment Act.
Third Reading of Bills
BILL 25 — HAIDA NATION RECOGNITION
AMENDMENT ACT,
Hon. M. Rankin: I move third reading of Bill 25, intituled the Haida Nation
Recognition Amendment Act, 2024.
After rigorous debate at committee stage, I encourage members from
all sides of the Legislature to vote in support of British Columbia’s
recognition of Haida’s Aboriginal title to Haida Gwaii.
The Speaker: Members, the motion is third reading of Bill 25, Haida Nation
Recognition Amendment Act, 2024.
Division has been called.
[3:20 p.m. - 3:25 p.m.]
Members, do we have the agreement to waive the time?
Interjections.
The Speaker: We don’t have an agreement. That’s okay. It’s only 90 seconds
left, so it’s okay.
Leave not granted.
[3:30 p.m.]
The Speaker: Members, the question is third reading of Bill 25, Haida Nation
Recognition Amendment Act, 2024.
Bill 25, Haida Nation Recognition Amendment Act, 2024, read a
third time and passed on the following division:
YEAS — 53
Chandra Herbert
Parmar
A. Singh
Babchuk
Lore
Chow
Beare
Kang
Heyman
Osborne
Cullen
Bains
Malcolmson
Bailey
Mercier
Russell
Routledge
Starchuk
Rice
Phillip
Yao
Leonard
R. Singh
Whiteside
Farnworth
Kahlon
Eby
Conroy
Sharma
Dix
Popham
Fleming
Dean
Rankin
Alexis
Sims
Simons
Elmore
Glumac
Routley
Furstenau
Olsen
D’Eith
Donnelly
Greene
Anderson
Chant
Sandhu
Dykeman
Paddon
Begg
Walker
Robinson
NAYS — 25
de Jong
Doerkson
Milobar
Stone
Falcon
Bond
Halford
Oakes
Paton
Davies
Banman
Morris
Kyllo
Shypitka
Sturko
Merrifield
Wat
Lee
Kirkpatrick
Stewart
Clovechok
Ashton
Sturdy
Letnick
Tegart
Hon. R. Kahlon: In the main chamber, I call Committee of Supply for the Office of
the Premier.
In the Douglas Fir Committee Room, I call Committee of the Whole
for Bill 27, Municipalities Enabling and Validating Amendment
Act.
In the Birch Committee Room, I call Committee of the Whole for
Bill 21, Legal Professions Act.
[3:35 p.m.]
Committee of Supply
ESTIMATES: OFFICE OF THE PREMIER
The House in Committee of Supply (Section B);
S. Chandra Herbert in the chair.
The committee met at 3:37 p.m.
The Chair: All right, Members. Let’s call this committee to
order.
On Vote 11: Office of the Premier, $16,754,000.
Hon. D. Eby: I’d like to begin by acknowledging we’re on the territory of the
lək̓ʷəŋən people, the Songhees
and Esquimalt First Nations.
I appreciate the opportunity to discuss the Premier’s estimates
with the House today.
I’m joined by several members of my staff. I’ve got Matt Smith,
chief of staff, here; Shannon Salter, Deputy Minister to the Premier;
Aileen Machell, deputy chief of staff; and Doug Caul, deputy minister
for policy and coordination.
The estimates today are taking place in a serious context.
Families in Fort Nelson and Doig River have had to flee their homes. The
wildfires are serious and ongoing, not just in our province but in
Alberta and Manitoba as well, as we see the impacts of climate
change.
It is a reminder of the challenges we have faced as British
Columbians: climate emergencies, floods, the heat dome, forest fires,
the toxic drug crisis, the global pandemic and the impacts that has had
globally, including on British Columbians. In times like these, there
are tough choices to be made.
Now, there is a group of people who advocate that this is the time
to leave people to fend for themselves. It’s the time to cut services,
to withdraw services, to turn people over to their own devices and to
hope for the best.
We’ve seen what that movie looks like in British Columbia. We’d
welcome speculators back into our housing market. We’d increase fees and
tolls and the cost of everyday life for British Columbians. We’d slash
the health care that people need now more than ever, with an aging and
growing population. It’s a risk we can’t afford. The government has to
have peoples’ backs.
Over the last year, British Columbians will have seen the actions
we’re taking to address the big challenges we face. In the example of
housing, we’re turning short-term rentals into long-term homes for
people, speeding up permitting to get housing built to respond to the
massive population growth we’re seeing in the province, fixing the
zoning rules that slow down the development of new housing at a time
when our population is setting a record for growth that we haven’t seen
for 30 years, a flipping tax to stop speculation in the housing market
and using public land to build actually attainable housing for the
middle class.
Every step of the way, every initiative we have introduced, the
opposition parties, and it doesn’t matter if it’s the BCUP or the
Conservatives, have opposed these measures. They are siding consistently
with those who are using homes as investments instead of as a place to
live. We take a different approach.
[3:40 p.m.]
We’re also acting to ease the costs of daily life. Rising interest
rates are impacting British Columbians. This is a global inflationary
context that we’re seeing, which is impacting British
Columbians.
For our government, supporting people with the cost of daily life,
just recently an ICBC announcement: two more years of zero percent rate
increases. That brings it to a total of six years, the fourth rebate
from ICBC. We’ve saved drivers $2,000 since reforming that Crown
corporation.
Cutting child care fees in half for British Columbians. Free birth
control, and, starting next year, one round of IVF free in this
province.
The B.C. electricity credit — putting $100 back, as a credit, on
the invoices that people received from B.C. Hydro, both businesses and
individuals.
The climate action tax credit — increasing the amount that
we’re sending back to people.
Supporting small businesses with the
employer health tax, removing that for businesses with payrolls under $1
million.
Members opposite consistently made different choices. They
promised tax support for small businesses, and then, once they were
elected, they didn’t implement it. They cut taxes for the top 2 percent
but raised fees and costs for everybody else, including tolls on bridges
— actions that they still defend today. We couldn’t afford that then,
can’t afford it now, and certainly, British Columbians don’t need to see
that kind of activity in our province again.
I want to express my appreciation to health care workers across
the province who rose to the pandemic challenges. But where we’re seeing
significant new challenges in our health care system…. We’re adding
10,000 people to this province every 37 days. These folks need health
care.
They’re also some of the health care workers that we need. We’ve
recruited internationally trained doctors and nurses and sped up the
process to get them approved, resulting in 700 more doctors — family
doctors, supporting people in those long-term relationships people are
looking for — and 6,300 nurses just last year. We’ve cut our COVID
surgery backlog, and 300,000 people visited a pharmacist for support
with minor illnesses.
We’re building hospitals across the province, hospitals that
should have been built a long time ago. Care homes for seniors and
cancer centres right across the province. The members across the way did
the opposite. It doesn’t matter which party. If you’re talking about the
Conservatives or the BCUP, that is what they did. They cut health care
for British Columbians, and the impacts are plain to see.
The good news is that our economy is growing. We’re leading
Canada, and we’re doing so well supporting people. We recently got the
news: in the last 12 months, 93,000 jobs created for British Columbians,
mostly private sector, full-time jobs. Some of the highest wages in
Canada. The lowest unemployment rate in Canada.
Our biggest strength is the people of British Columbia, their
resilience and their talents. Any time we can bring people together, we
will do so, rather than following the example of those across the way
who want to drive people apart. We want to deliver a B.C. where everyone
can build a good life.
I look forward to the discussion we’re going to have
today.
K. Falcon: I want to thank the Premier for that very non-partisan beginning
there. My very, very quick, high-level response to that would just be to
remind the Premier that as I canvass Premier’s estimates, what he will
find is that there will be a theme, and that is the difference between
announcements and actual results. I think that the Premier will find
that there is a yawning chasm between the announcements that this
government likes to make and the actual results we see on the
ground.
Very quickly, to summarize some of them…. The Premier is part of
the government, after all, that announced — in fact, it was a major part
of their campaign platform in 2017 — that they were going to make
housing more affordable for British Columbians. In fact, as part of
that, they were going to build 114,000 affordable homes within ten
years.
So I always say: “Okay, well, here we are, and they’re in year 7
of their government. How did they do?” Well, of the 114,000 promised
affordable homes, sad to say that only 16,000 actually got built, with a
mere three years left.
The government’s response is that they stopped talking about that
promise now, and they renamed the program to BC Builds. Now we are
supposed to believe that because they have renamed a program, they are
going to get different results. The fact of the matter is that in
addition to not building the promised 114,000 additional units, what we
have seen is that British Columbia…. This is not just the Leader of the
Opposition saying this. These are the actual facts.
[3:45 p.m.]
We’ve ended up, after seven years of this NDP government, with the
most unaffordable housing in North America — not just in Canada, but in
North America. That’s quite an achievement, but not a good one for the
public.
Same with rents. We’ve got the highest rents in the entire country
here in British Columbia. Now that, Premier — just to be clear, so you
understand it — is called an outcome. You can give all the excuses you
want about why that outcome is there. But the fact of the matter is you
have to own the outcome, because you’ve been the government that
promised that you were going to make housing more affordable.
So too with food prices, with the highest grocery prices in the
country. As I mentioned the other day in question period, a $73 random
bag of groceries here in British Columbia is 24 percent cheaper when
you’re buying it in Calgary. Fuel prices in British Columbia. Again, the
highest, not just in Canada, but indeed in North America. We’ll canvass
that a little later, too, I can assure you.
But also just the rate of overdose deaths, the highest we’ve ever
seen in the history of the province of British Columbia. The Premier’s
catch-and-release crime policy has been a disaster for communities
across the province.
I would just remind the Premier that a lot of our focus is going
to be on results, outcomes, measurables and things that, in the real
world, you get held accountable for. I can assure the Premier that in
the private sector, you do not get held accountable, and you do not
receive your paycheque and any bonuses for the announcements that you
make. It’s actually for the results that you get.
If you get really bad results, then you likely are not going to be
either employed or running a business for very much longer. I know
that’s a bit foreign to this government and these members, but that’s
the real world out there.
Now, where they are getting some good results, admittedly, is that
they are leading the country in terms of lineups at food banks. That’s
not a good result for the people that have to line up for those food
banks. A 60 percent increase in food banks usage is…. Well, that is a
dramatic increase. It’s certainly not good for the folks that are
suffering and having to go utilize those food banks.
We will canvass this in the areas that we intend to cover, but
where I want to start off is to visit the issue that I don’t think we’ve
had proper conclusion on. That’s the issue of the rampant antisemitism
which is rife within the Premier’s caucus, his cabinet, and
indeed, his party.
A little backup for the folks that are watching. There’s a history
here. The Premier will recall that at the last time that we met last
year to talk about the Premier’s estimates, I was talking about the
unfortunate pattern that this Premier has of creating a situation where
blame is provided to particular identifiable ethnic communities.
I used the example of the Premier’s unfortunate, very flawed
“study.”
I put “study” in air quotations because it was his own study that
he did with one other individual that said, based on 122 homes on the
west side of Vancouver, that the majority of them had non-anglicized
last names and therefore leaped to the conclusion that the housing
crisis is therefore caused by Chinese foreign investors.
That created a huge negative impact on the Asian community in
British Columbia and led to a lot of the anti-Asian sentiment
that, unfortunately, has risen to very unacceptable levels in B.C. I
asked the Premier last year to at least apologize to the community and
do the right thing. The Premier chose not to do so.
But it’s tied to the antisemitism. As the Premier will recall,
consistency around how we deal with these kind of issues is very
important. When some local First Nation members complained about the
treatment that they were receiving in the health care system — there
were very serious allegations of racism — the Premier moved
appropriately with light speed to deal with that. He immediately called
for an independent investigation into the challenges that some of these
First Nation folks were receiving, and we applauded that quick
response.
However, that contrasts very, very differently to the response
that the Premier had when his own senior cabinet minister from his own
government made, admittedly, an inappropriate comment with respect to
the historical nature of the lands of Israel and apologized multiple
times and even offered to the Premier to take an anti-Islamophobia
course.
[3:50 p.m.]
The Premier’s decision was to remove her from cabinet in his
government. Now, that was a rare moment of action by the Premier, and it
was on the heels of multiple examples — which we have pointed out
repeatedly in this House — from members of his own caucus, his own
party, his own cabinet that have made extremely irresponsible,
antisemitic commentary that has been very hurtful for the Jewish
community.
Now, when the Premier fired the member for Coquitlam-Maillardville
from cabinet, she wrote a letter that outlined and exposed the
antisemitism that she’d witnessed and had had to live through in the
cabinet caucus and, indeed, spreading throughout the government. Her
words were clear, and I quote them into the record here. “Antisemitism
is the double standard that we have consistently shown.” She gave
multiple examples to back that up.
Even recently with the horrific event of October 7 that took
place, within days of that massacre, when that same member, the member
for Coquitlam-Maillardville, sent out an email to her colleagues asking
for everyone to stand with the community, which was feeling very fragile
at that horrific time, the member for Richmond-Queensborough felt it
necessary to respond to all of them by saying: “Well, what we need to do
is make a public statement about the plight of the
Palestinians.”
The timing of a request like that, within days of that massacre
taking place, was certainly inappropriate, according to the member for
Coquitlam-Maillardville. The member for Richmond-Queensborough also, on
Yom HaShoah — a day that commemorates Jewish victims of the Holocaust,
one of the most sombre days you can possibly imagine, when we had
members of the Jewish community here, steps away from this chamber,
commemorating that horrific event — felt it appropriate to quote from
fringe Jewish groups that excused the antisemitism that was taking place
at the UBC campus protests for Palestine, which was deeply offensive to
the community.
I could list through all the examples here, but really, what we
need from this Premier is an answer to a pretty straightforward
question, something that we and members of the Jewish community have
been asking for, for many months. That is simply this: will the Premier
commit to an independent investigation — as he did, appropriately, in
the case of the First Nations racism that I referenced earlier —
into antisemitism within his own cabinet, in his own caucus and, indeed,
his own government? Will the Premier do it, and if not, why
not?
[3:55 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.]
Hon. D. Eby: This is a profoundly challenging time for the Jewish community,
not just in British Columbia but across North America and around the
world. We’ve seen a rise in antisemitic incidents. I’ve had a number of
meetings with the Jewish community, both pre- and post-October 7.
There’s no question that the community is on edge.
I heard a story from a principal at a school, who described coming
to school with running shoes on for fear that there would be an attack
on her and her students post-October 7. At places of gathering for
worship, at community centres that serve the Jewish community, that
anxiety is present right now, all around the world. For us here in
British Columbia, we know we have a responsibility to support the Jewish
community with ensuring that they feel safe in every part of every
community.
We’ve taken some actions to that end, specifically post–October
On February 16, we announced a new B.C. prosecution service hate
crime policy. The policy includes specific provisions about the wilful
promotion of antisemitism. This is the policy that the prosecutors use
to guide their decisions about approving charges, a long-standing
concern of not just the Jewish community but many community members that
for prosecutors, the guidance that they were using to determine whether
or not to charge someone with a hate offence was not sufficient to
respond to the realities they were seeing in the community.
We made security funding available for Jewish organizations and
synagogues. A number of organizations dramatically increased their
security post-October 7, taking money from services meant for the
community in order to pay for security. The support provided by the
province enables them to be able to use that money for its intended
purpose rather than for security.
On October 30, we announced at the Jewish Community Centre that we
would make Holocaust education mandatory in high schools in British
Columbia — one of the first provinces in Canada to do that.
[4:05 p.m.]
At that event, I met with Holocaust survivors who do this work at
schools, and they talked about their class visits that they do. But
these are quite elderly people, and they won’t always be able to do this
work. So ensuring that students in our province have access to and are
taught about the Holocaust will be one of the ways we fight against
misinformation or Holocaust denial or any other forms of
antisemitism.
The racist incident helpline will be established soon in the
province. This will be another tool. Sometimes people have one of these
incidents, and they just don’t feel like they can come forward to
police. They’re anxious about reporting to police, or they just feel
like it doesn’t rise to the level, although it’s personally upsetting
and deeply traumatizing, that they don’t want to report it to
police.
This gives them another way to report these incidents, where there
will be counselling and support for them if they wish to come forward to
police or just to say: “Look, this happened. I want you to know that it
happened.” That will enable us to respond to spikes in hate in different
parts of the community.
We also have updated policing standards to help support police
investigations involving hate crimes to ensure that police have the
tools that they need to address these issues.
It’s important to note that it’s not just the Jewish community
that’s seen a spike in hate, and certainly not just British Columbia and
Canada. Between, and this is the most recent data we have, ’19 and ’20,
the number of police-reported crimes motivated by race or ethnicity
increased 80 percent, from 884 to 1,619. The East or Southeast Asian
populations saw a 301 percent increase; Indigenous populations, a 152
percent increase; Black populations, a 92 percent increase; South Asian
populations, a 47 percent increase.
Members will remember that during the pandemic, we also had a
social epidemic of anti-Asian hate crime. The anti-Asian hate crime rose
by 717 percent in Vancouver alone, from 2019, when there were 12
incidents, to 2020, when there were 98 incidents.
I don’t think it would be a surprise to any British Columbian to
hear that the rise of the far right in the United States and in other
parts of the world is contributing to this.
It is our obligation to fight that at every corner in this
province, and we continue to do the work. Members will remember that we
re-established the Office of the Human Rights Commissioner, who we just
reappointed today — congratulations to the commissioner, and thank you
to her for her work — fully independent of this Legislative Assembly and
able to provide recommendations to government about how we can fight
hate.
The member mentioned the In Plain Sight report, fighting
anti-Indigenous hate in our health care system. The anti-racism base
funding — this is funding for community organizations to be able to
respond to incidents in community and support people. It’s critically
important support. We will continue to do this important work with
communities across the province.
We’re coming up, I think, in the next couple of days to the
international day of recognition in the fight against hate against the
queer community in British Columbia. This is a really important day to
recognize the rising hate against that community. I’m very sorry to say
that we are seeing that right across the country — the targeting of
vulnerable kids, and parents afraid for their kids being safe. It
doesn’t matter the community; we’re going to make sure that we’re taking
that action.
The member made a number of very serious allegations in his
question, and he knows they’re not right.
What I’d like to do, though, is underline for British Columbians
from all different communities who are feeling particularly vulnerable
right now: we’re going to be there for you, and we’re going to keep
doing that work to fight racism in our province. Our strength in this
province is us working together and fighting hate.
K. Falcon: I must confess. I am troubled that a very straightforward question
about the double standard taking place with this Premier and his
government with respect to antisemitism, which is clearly rife within
his cabinet, caucus and party and, sadly, seems to be spreading through
government, cannot be answered without a large interval where the
Premier then stands up and talks about a lot of other issues that are
completely unrelated to the question I asked.
[4:10 p.m.]
The Premier mentioned hate from the far right. That’s true, but
there’s hate from the far left too. That’s part of the problem that
we’re facing. As I talked about in my opening comments, this is another
example where results matter, not the promises and commitments that were
made but the actual results.
I’ll just use one of the examples he talked about. He talked about
a help line. Well, the problem is they promised that three years ago —
still no hotline in place for those that are dealing with racist
incidents. The Premier needs help on how to set up a line. It’s not that
complex. I’m happy to offer assistance. But surely to god, it doesn’t
take three years in order to get that done.
Again, the Premier’s not going to answer the question about
whether he will do the right thing and call a full, independent
investigation, as he did with those First Nation individuals that were
dealing with racist incidents within the health care system. He refuses
to do that with respect to his own cabinet and caucus and party. That’s
unfortunate, because that undermines trust.
I understand that there’s racism against other groups out there. I
gave an example of the explosion in anti-Asian racism, sadly in part due
to some of the comments that this Premier himself has made that made it
very, very challenging for the Chinese community, when people were
blaming them, solely, for the housing crisis when that clearly is not
backed up by the data.
I’ll try another angle. One of the most important requests, and
the Premier has heard this from the Jewish community…. Their number one
request is that the Premier will at least commit to having his cabinet
and caucus undergo mandatory training that is founded under the IHRA
definition, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition
of antisemitism, for his own caucus and cabinet. That is the number one
request that the Jewish community has made of this Premier.
There are six other provinces that have adopted that IHRA
definition, including Ontario, Alberta, Manitoba, New Brunswick,
Saskatchewan, Newfoundland, the federal government. Will the Premier at
least agree to doing that?
[4:15 p.m.]
Hon. D. Eby: I’ve had a number of opportunities to meet with leadership from
the Jewish community. That’s one of the ways that we knew about this
issue, about the security funding, and we were able to provide that
support. That dialogue continues, and we’ll do all we can to support the
community during what is a really challenging time, without
question.
To the member’s question, I agree it would be a very good thing
for all MLAs to have anti-racism training that includes clear
antisemitism training to fight against racism and to recognize ways that
we can ensure that this place is welcoming for everybody. That’s why
we’re proceeding with a recommendation that was made from the
Legislature report on anti-racism for that training for all MLAs that
come to this place. It must include content on antisemitism. We’re going
to continue those conversations with the Jewish community.
With respect to the resignation of Minister Robinson, at a media
availability on February 5, 2024, I said: “The depth of the work that
Minister Robinson needs to do in order to address the harms that she has
caused is significant, and it is incompatible with her continuing as
Minister of Advanced Education, given the volume and depth of the work
that she needs to do.”
Members will remember that this was taking place at the time of
the discussions with the federal government around international student
numbers and accommodation and ensuring that our institutions here in the
province were prepared for the changes the federal government was making
around that program.
I would like to share with the member some correspondence I
received from people who self-identified as being from the Jewish
community: “Dear Premier, my name is Gideon. I want to thank you for
holding firm on denouncing antisemitism and for making Holocaust
education mandatory in B.C. schools. Your actions and your concerns for
the safety of B.C.’s Jewish community have shown that you are a sincere
friend and supporter. For this, I am very grateful. I was particularly
moved by your attendance and speech at the Kristallnacht commemoration
on November 9.”
Another letter: “Dear Premier, as expressions of antisemitism are
increasing and concerning, it’s more important now than ever to do what
we can to ensure all students coming through our schools have
well-developed curricula from which to learn. Thank you for your
leadership and your clarity on these issues.” From Esther.
Another one. “Dear Premier, I’m writing to express my profound
appreciation for your recent efforts to make Holocaust education
mandatory in our schools. Your commitment to this important initiative
is commendable and reflects your dedication to preserving the memory of
the Holocaust and ensuring that future generations learn from this dark
chapter in history. Thank you for your commitment to this crucial
cause,” and so on. From Daniel.
[4:20 p.m.]
Now, I understand the Jewish community is diverse and that these
are just a few individuals. But it’s important for the Jewish community
to know that, to the best my knowledge, every single member of this
House is committed to their safety, to standing with them in this really
challenging time.
We’ll do all we can to make sure that they feel safe in our
province and welcome in this province. That’s my commitment to them, and
it’s important to put on the record.
K. Falcon: I’ll try again. I’m just trying to get a very straightforward
answer. It doesn’t require five minutes of huddling with staff. This is
just a straight-up question for the Premier that shouldn’t be too hard
to answer.
I’m suspecting it’s because the Premier doesn’t like the IHRA
definition of antisemitism. It’s the only possible conclusion I can come
to. I know the Premier intervened in May 2022 to prevent the adoption of
the IHRA definition in the Anti-Racism Data Act. I’m concerned that this
may be underpinning his resistance to answer a straightforward
question.
Again, this is not about training for all the MLAs. Thankfully,
all the MLAs in this esteemed institution have not been expressing
antisemitic tropes or antisemitic language. It’s actually come from your
party, your government and your caucus. I don’t have time, but I could
go through a long list, and the Premier is well aware of
this.
Again to the Premier, will the Premier follow the leadership of
six other provinces and the federal government, and use the IHRA
definition as the working definition with respect to mandatory
antisemitism training for his caucus? Yes or no?
[4:25 p.m.]
Hon. D. Eby: The member