role="main" class="main-container container js-quickedit-main-content" id="main-content">

May 16, 2000

37th Parliament, 1st Session

< Previous sitting day

Next sitting day >

Hansard Transcripts

vol. A

Hansard Transcripts

vol. B

Votes and Proceedings

Orders and Notices

Hansard Transcript 2000-May-16 vol. A (PDF)

L059A - Tue 16 May 2000 / Mar 16 mai 2000

WRITTEN QUESTIONS

MEMBERS' STATEMENTS

PELEE ISLAND FERRY SERVICE

DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED

MANITOULIN SECONDARY SCHOOL

CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES

VOLUNTEER CHILDREN'S SERVICES

CULTURAL CLUBS

EDUCATIONAL FACILITY

NORTHERN HEALTH SERVICES

POLICE WEEK

VISITOR

REPORTS BY COMMITTEES

STANDING COMMITTEE ON JUSTICE AND SOCIAL POLICY

VISITORS

INTRODUCTION OF BILLS

CERTIFIED GENERAL ACCOUNTANTS ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO ACT, 2000

MINISTERIAL TRAVEL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT, 2000 / LOI DE 2000 SUR L'OBLIGATION DE RENDRE COMPTE DES VOYAGES MINISTÉRIELS

TILBURY AREA PUBLIC SCHOOL ACT (WILLIAM J. MILLER TRUST), 2000

STATEMENTS BY THE MINISTRY AND RESPONSES

POLICE WEEK / SEMAINE DE LA POLICE

VISITORS

DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED

ORAL QUESTIONS

HEALTH CARE

ONTARIO REALTY CORP

MEMBERS' COMPENSATION

2008 SUMMER OLYMPICS FUNDING

ONTARIO REALTY CORP

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

HYDRO RATES

TRAVEL INDUSTRY COMPENSATION FUND

GRANDVIEW TRAINING SCHOOL FOR GIRLS

HOUSING POLICY

CONNECTING-LINK PROGRAM

HIGH-TECHNOLOGY SECTOR

CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES

PETITIONS

IPPERWASH PROVINCIAL PARK

LORD'S PRAYER

CULTURAL CLUBS

DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED

SCHOOL CLOSURES

LORD'S PRAYER

MUNICIPAL RESTRUCTURING

HIGHWAY 407

MUNICIPAL RESTRUCTURING

SCHOOL CLOSURES

NORTHERN HEALTH TRAVEL GRANT

ORDERS OF THE DAY

TAXPAYER DIVIDEND ACT, 2000 / LOI DE 2000 SUR LE VERSEMENT D'UN DIVIDENDE AUX CONTRIBUABLES

PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT, 2000 / LOI DE 2000 SUR LA RESPONSABILITÉ PARENTALE

PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT, 2000 / LOI DE 2000 SUR LA RESPONSABILITÉ PARENTALE

The House met at 1330.

Prayers.

WRITTEN QUESTIONS

Mr Michael A. Brown (Algoma-Manitoulin): I have a point of order, Mr Speaker, under standing order 96(d).

On December 22, 1999, I asked the Minister of Energy, Science and Technology to provide a full accounting of the mitigation package relating to the "Patten Post" component of the Elliot Lake uranium mine closure. As members of the House would know, the NDP government of Bob Rae broke its solemn commitment to the uranium miners of Elliot Lake and the North Shore, which was to purchase 100% of the uranium from that community. This action resulted in the layoff of 4,000 miners and many others indirectly.

To meet the economic challenge of getting the major industry on the North Shore, the government by order in council required Hydro to do certain things. The obligations have not been discharged. The "Patten Post" hydro project component of the order in council was not built and apparently is not to be built. This action or inaction triggers a compensation package within that agreement.

In December, I asked for a full accounting of this component of the package. The minister has had five months to answer my question. It is a matter, Mr Speaker, of an accountant looking at the books of Ontario Hydro and of the Ministry of Energy, both of which, you would know, have filed their final statements for that year.

It is unacceptable to have an answer not provided to a member of this Legislature, under the standing order, within five months. Mr Speaker, I would ask you to instruct the government, to instruct the Minister of Energy, to reply to this. The fact that he says he will reply on June 22 of this year just means I will have no opportunity to ask him a question about it because, as you know, we won't be back until this fall. Mr Speaker, I need your help.

The Speaker (Hon Gary Carr): Just very quickly, I didn't catch whether that was a written question under our standing orders. It was a written part of it? I didn't know if it was an oral question.

Mr Brown: No.

The Speaker: I thank the member. What we are going to do is check and confirm the facts as he told us. As the member knows, under

section 97, "The minister shall answer such written questions within 24 sitting days." We will check when the question was asked and obviously see if it was followed through. I thank the member for raising the point of order.

Mr Brown: May I point out, Mr Speaker, the ministry on the last day provided an answer which said they would not respond to this question until June 22. I would submit to you they have this information. It's not difficult. That puts me in the position of not being able to ask the minister a reasonable question based on the information that they were to provide.

The Speaker: That's very helpful additional information. I thank the member for the point of order. I will reserve.

MEMBERS' STATEMENTS

PELEE ISLAND FERRY SERVICE

Mr Bruce Crozier (Essex): The residents and businesses on Pelee Island, the most southerly point of Canada, are a hardy group. Throughout the winter, from December till March, the only connection they have with the mainland, and access to it, is through an air service. From that point on, the Pelee Island ferry service is their lifeline.

What started out as a minor inconvenience has turned out to be an economic disaster. It is now 19 days that the Pelee Island ferry service has been interrupted by a labour dispute. A couple of years ago, when I chaired a committee that looked into the operation of the Pelee Island ferry with the objective of having the municipalities run the ferry service, the Minister of Transportation of the day, Mr Clement, said that the province would continue to be responsible for the operation of that service.

It has now been interrupted and, as I said, an economic disaster is looming. The Minister of Transportation, through a government agency, the Ontario Northland Transportation Commission, has the responsibility to get this ferry back in operation. I plead for the Minister of Transportation to take leadership on this issue and do so.

DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED

Ms Marilyn Mushinski (Scarborough Centre): I take great pleasure to acknowledge the presence of some very special visitors in the gallery today.

They are David Barber, president, and Keith Powell, executive director of the Ontario Association for Living; June Chiu, president, Agnes Samler, executive director, and Cay Shedden of the Toronto Association for Community Living-Cay is also a constituent of mine and a great friend; Nancy Wallace-Gero, executive director of the Essex County Association for Community Living; Marty Graf, executive director of the Tillsonburg and District Association for Community Living; and Sandy Keshen, executive director of REENA. They are also joined by Donna Britten, and Jesse Flis, a former member of Parliament.

In honour of our visitors, I want to advise members of the government's latest efforts to support people with developmental disabilities in this province. My colleague the Minister of Community and Social Services provided an additional $50 million this year in resources to provide services and supports for people with developmental disabilities and their families. This $50 million includes $30 million in new supports and services.

Again I want to recognize the wonderful people who have assisted us with this program in the gallery today.

MANITOULIN SECONDARY SCHOOL

Mr Michael A. Brown (Algoma-Manitoulin): Mr Speaker, I rise to ask yourself and all members of this Legislature to join me in saluting Mr Rob Cassibo, who is a teacher and the head of the science department at Manitoulin Secondary School. Mr Cassibo is a tireless, enthusiastic volunteer who has inspired students both inside and outside the classroom to science education.

This year, Manitoulin Secondary School will be representing Ontario and Canada at the International Science Olympiad at Spokane, Washington, on May 19. In recent days, the students of MSS teams won big at the Provincial Science Olympiad. Two teams of 10 students each from a very small high school in northern Ontario, on Manitoulin Island, won gold and won bronze. They will be going on this adventure almost as we speak. The students have worked very hard.

I'd just like to quote Mr Cassibo when he was asked if there was some problem getting the students to work hard. He explained that there was no problem at all in finding kids who are willing to stay at school until 11:00 on Friday night and then be back for 11 o'clock on Saturday morning and work for another 10 hours. "All we have to do is unlock the door and the kids will show up," said Mr Cassibo.

I salute Mr Cassibo and those students at MSS.

CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES

Mr Garfield Dunlop (Simcoe North): About 20 months ago, police constable William Hancox was murdered while on surveillance detail at a shopping plaza in Scarborough. The two women who were convicted of this cruel and cowardly act were sentenced to 18 and 16 years respectively at a medium-security correctional facility. Since that time, it has been learned that these two lovers have been living together in jail. What a slap in the face to all victims of crime. Mrs Hancox has lost her partner; her children have lost a father.

The killers, however, were allowed to stay together in a nice bungalow, the correctional facility for women in Quebec nicknamed Club Fed. How can a criminal be rehabilitated when they're in the lap of luxury?

When the federal government talks about reforming its prisons, it talks about removing razor wire and guards' firearms, having community kitchens and giving inmates keys to their cells, basically making prisons more comfortable for criminals.

I understand that the two have now been separated, thanks partly to Minister Sampson embarrassing the federal corrections into making changes. That is why I'm proud to be part of a government that understands that prison reform is not about making jails more comfortable but about reducing the return-to-crime rate. Our government is committed to ensuring that criminals pay for the crimes they have committed.

I wish that certain federal government members would realize that there are serious problems in the federal corrections system and quit fearmongering the citizens of Ontario, who are having their system reviewed by a minister who is seeking a corrections system that stresses public safety, security and efficiency, and one that produces results.

VOLUNTEER CHILDREN'S SERVICES

Mr Ernie Parsons (Prince Edward-Hastings): My statement today pertains to this government's lack of support for children's aid society volunteers. One of the lifelines of our society has been the willingness of volunteers to come forward and assist those in need. For many years now, volunteers have worked with our children's aid societies by driving children to appointments, visits or hospitals. They serve as a pillar of support during what are very trying times for these children.

To help defray the cost of gasoline and wear and tear on their cars, the agencies have been able to provide them with a small mileage allowance. This recognizes that volunteers should not be out of pocket while assisting this government in serving the needs of their children.

This small financial support is now at risk. The Minister of Community and Social Services implemented a new funding formula for children's aid societies which reduces the funding for volunteer car mileage to zero, zip or nil. These people give of their time day after day to support our most vulnerable citizens. At the very time when greedy oil companies have substantially increased their prices, this government puts volunteerism at risk.

I call upon the minister to revisit this decision. Surely the cost of the Premier's new airplane is not being subsidized by the volunteers of this province. We owe it to our children to ensure that help for them is available.

CULTURAL CLUBS

Mr Peter Kormos (Niagara Centre): Ethnic cultural service clubs are a part of the heart and soul of each and every one of our ridings and communities, but they've come under attack by this government by virtue of their reclassification in terms of taxation as commercial, in contrast to the historical residential status they've had. The regulation hasn't changed. The regulation still indicates that land owned and occupied by a non-profit service organization shall be classified as residential and taxed accordingly.

However, this government's interpretive memo specifically excludes cultural clubs, notwithstanding that they're non-profit. That means that organizations like the Canadian Polish Society, Club Roma, both in St Catharines, the Slovak Hall, the Croatian National Home, Club Sociale-the list could go on and on-are at risk of being literally euthanized by this government because of the huge 200% and 300% property tax increases imposed on them.

It's not enough for the minister to tell communities that communities should, piecemeal, provide tax rebates. It's important that this government understand that with a mere stroke of the pen-no regulatory amendments, merely revising and correcting its interpretive memo-it can permit these halls to survive. It's time for this government to do precisely that.

EDUCATIONAL FACILITY

Mr Bart Maves (Niagara Falls): Last month I had the privilege of attending the official opening of Kate S. Durdan Public School. Last week, Mr Ted Salci, a local community leader, attended the official opening of Loretto Catholic School on my behalf. The common thread between these two schools is that both boards share the same building and facilities. At a time when many changes are being made to the Ontario education system, it is impressive to see a partnership like this in action.

As I walked down the halls and met with students and staff at the Durdan opening, I could recognize and sense their admiration and fondness for their new home. I would like to commend the hard work and co-operation of both Loretto principal Sherry Shuttler and Durdan principal Sandra Stevenson and their teachers. This partnership is the first of its kind in the Niagara region, and I am proud to speak of it today in the House.

Both halves of the new facility were named after outstanding women. Loretto was named after the Loretto Sisters, an order of sisters in Niagara Falls that taught Catholic girls at the Loretto Academy. Durdan is named after Ontario's first principal, Kate Sarah Durdan of Maple Street School in Niagara Falls.

Once again, congratulations to all of those who participated in the creation of the new building. I am confident that continued success will prevail from this partnership and that the students of both Durdan and Loretto will leave positive marks on their new schools which will last for years to come.

NORTHERN HEALTH SERVICES

Mr Rick Bartolucci (Sudbury): Today in Sudbury health officials are meeting with northern hospital representatives in the hopes of avoiding a health care crisis in our area. We can avoid the crisis if the Minister of Health stops the rhetoric and starts listening to the solutions.

The answer is not the new contract negotiated with the doctors. In fact, the new agreement does nothing for the geographical maldistribution problems we have in northern Ontario. If anything, it makes the problems worse. The region of northern Ontario is 400 doctors short. We have a critical need for 250 specialists in all disciplines. We have a shortage of roughly 150 family physicians. In Sudbury alone we are short 50 to 60 doctors, which means 18,000 people do not have access to a family physician and now will have to go to southern Ontario for specialist care.

The solution in the short term is relatively easy. It is found in the document called From Crisis to Stability. This northern solution will work.

My question to the Minister of Health is, will the minister commit today not only to sending her staff but also to sending the necessary money to implement our northern solution? Minister, you have caused the crisis. Our northern doctors have provided the stability. Northerners want to move from your crisis to our stability. Will the minister listen to the northern doctors and provide the necessary resources to achieve stability? Northerners await your answer.

POLICE WEEK

Mr Bert Johnson (Perth-Middlesex): To help mark Police Week in Ontario, I'd like to inform my colleagues about the safety fair I attended recently at the Lions Community Centre in the village of Thorndale. Organized by the West Nissouri Policing Committee and the OPP, the safety fair helped to increase awareness and recognition of local policing and fire services. It was also an opportunity for local residents to get first-hand information about the different types of crime that are occurring and to learn more about crime prevention initiatives. Local residents also had a chance to witness OPP Breathalyzer tests and demonstrations by the West Nissouri volunteer fire department.

There were a number of groups that helped to make the safety fair a great success, including Neighbourhood Watch, victims services, and the farm safety association. I'd like to applaud the efforts of Ray Chowen, chair of the West Nissouri Policing Committee, for his leadership. I'd also like to recognize the Thorndale Lions and Optimist clubs, Oxford Mutual, Blanchard Mutual and Middlesex Mutual, all of whom helped support the safety fair.

The safety fair demonstrated the value of bringing citizens, the police and firefighters together to help convey the importance of being proactive when it comes to crime prevention and community safety. Please join me in recognizing the West Nissouri Policing Committee for their efforts in promoting safer streets and safer communities.

VISITOR

The Speaker (Hon Gary Carr): Today in the Speaker's gallery we have Mr François Beaulne, who is the member of the National Assembly for Marguerite-D'youville. Would the members join in welcoming our friend from Quebec.

REPORTS BY COMMITTEES

STANDING COMMITTEE ON JUSTICE AND SOCIAL POLICY

Ms Marilyn Mushinski (Scarborough Centre): I beg leave to present a report from the standing committee on justice and social policy and move its adoption.

Clerk at the Table (Mr Todd Decker): Your committee begs to report the following bill, as amended:

Bill 62,

An Act to enact, amend and repeal various Acts in order to encourage direct democracy through municipal referendums, to provide additional tools to assist restructuring municipalities and to deal with other municipal matters / Projet de loi 62, Loi édictant, modifiant et abrogeant diverses lois en vue d'encourager la démocratie directe au moyen de référendums municipaux, de fournir des outils supplémentaires pour aider les municipalités restructurées et de traiter d'autres questions municipales.

The Speaker (Hon Gary Carr): Shall the report be received and adopted?

All those in favour will please say "aye."

All those opposed will please say "nay."

In my opinion, the ayes have it.

Call in the members. This will be a five-minute bell.

The division bells rang from 1352 to 1357.

The Speaker: All those in favour of the motion will please rise one at a time and be recognized by the Clerk.

Ayes

Arnott, Ted

Baird, John R.

Barrett, Toby

Beaubien, Marcel

Chudleigh, Ted

Clark, Brad

Clement, Tony

Cunningham, Dianne

DeFaria, Carl

Dunlop, Garfield

Ecker, Janet

Elliott, Brenda

Eves, Ernie L.

Flaherty, Jim

Gilchrist, Steve

Gill, Raminder

Guzzo, Garry J.

Hardeman, Ernie

Harris, Michael D.

Hodgson, Chris

Jackson, Cameron

Johns, Helen

Johnson, Bert

Klees, Frank

Marland, Margaret

Martiniuk, Gerry

Maves, Bart

Mazzilli, Frank

Molinari, Tina R.

Munro, Julia

Mushinski, Marilyn

Newman, Dan

O'Toole, John

Ouellette, Jerry J.

Palladini, Al

Runciman, Robert W.

Sampson, Rob

Spina, Joseph

Sterling, Norman W.

Stewart, R. Gary

Stockwell, Chris

Tascona, Joseph N.

Tilson, David

Tsubouchi, David H.

Turnbull, David

Wilson, Jim

Witmer, Elizabeth

Wood, Bob

Young, David

The Speaker: All those opposed to the motion will please rise one at a time.

Nays

Agostino, Dominic

Bartolucci, Rick

Bisson, Gilles

Boyer, Claudette

Bradley, James J.

Brown, Michael A.

Bryant, Michael

Caplan, David

Christopherson, David

Churley, Marilyn

Cleary, John C.

Colle, Mike

Crozier, Bruce

Curling, Alvin

Di Cocco, Caroline

Dombrowsky, Leona

Duncan, Dwight

Gerretsen, John

Hampton, Howard

Hoy, Pat

Kennedy, Gerard

Kormos, Peter

Kwinter, Monte

Lalonde, Jean-Marc

Lankin, Frances

Marchese, Rosario

Martel, Shelley

McLeod, Lyn

Parsons, Ernie

Patten, Richard

Peters, Steve

Phillips, Gerry

Ruprecht, Tony

Smitherman, George

Clerk of the House (Mr Claude L. DesRosiers): The ayes are 49; the nays are 34.

The Speaker: I declare the motion carried.

Pursuant to the order of the House dated Monday, May 1, 2000, the bill is ordered for third reading.

VISITORS

The Speaker (Hon Gary Carr): Before we begin, in the Speaker's gallery today we have the present regional chair of Ottawa-Carleton, the former MPP Bob Chiarelli, and the members of the Ottawa delegation, including, I believe, the mayor of Gloucester, Claudette Cain. Would all the members join in welcoming our former member.

INTRODUCTION OF BILLS

CERTIFIED GENERAL ACCOUNTANTS ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO ACT, 2000

Mr Wood moved first reading of the following bill:

Bill Pr4,

An Act respecting the Certified General Accountants Association of Ontario.

The Speaker (Hon Gary Carr): Is it the pleasure of the House that the motion carry? Carried.

Pursuant to standing order 84, the bill is referred to the standing committee on regulations and private bills.

MINISTERIAL TRAVEL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT, 2000 / LOI DE 2000 SUR L'OBLIGATION DE RENDRE COMPTE DES VOYAGES MINISTÉRIELS

Mr Bartolucci moved first reading of the following bill:

Bill 77,

An Act respecting Accountability for Ministerial Travel / Projet de loi 77, Loi concernant l'obligation de rendre compte des voyages ministériels.

The Speaker (Hon Gary Carr): Is it the pleasure of the House that the motion carry?

All those in favour of the motion will please say "aye."

All those opposed will please say "nay."

In my opinion, the ayes have it.

The member for a short statement.

Mr Rick Bartolucci (Sudbury): I'm happy to see that 23 ministers are in the chamber today. I'm sure they all support this. This bill requires members of the executive council of Ontario to submit to the Legislative Assembly or the Clerk of the assembly information relating to any travel by the member on government business to areas outside the province. The information must be submitted within 60 days of the member's return from outside the province.

The information that shall be submitted is a written

summary of the purpose of the travel and of any accomplishments resulting from the travel, including a listing of the benefits and terms of tangible investments and employment opportunities that the travel will bring to Ontario, and a detailed statement of all expenses incurred by the member as well as by any staff accompanying the member. In fact, it is a code of conduct for cabinet ministers. If enacted, it would avoid the scandals which are presently found in the ORC.

TILBURY AREA PUBLIC SCHOOL ACT (WILLIAM J. MILLER TRUST), 2000

Mr Hoy moved first reading of the following bill:

Bill Pr18,

An Act respecting the Tilbury Area Public School and the William J. Miller Trust.

The Speaker (Hon Gary Carr): Is it the pleasure of the House that the motion carry? Carried.

Pursuant to standing order 86(a), this bill is referred to the Commissioners of Estate Bills.

Motions?

Mr James J. Bradley (St Catharines): On a point of order, Mr Speaker: When you're into motions, I have a unanimous consent I'd like to request of members of the government and the House. That is that we proceed with the second and third reading of Bill 16,

An Act respecting the price of gasoline.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House that the motion carry? I'm afraid I heard some noes.

STATEMENTS BY THE MINISTRY AND RESPONSES

POLICE WEEK / SEMAINE DE LA POLICE

Hon David H. Tsubouchi (Solicitor General): Today I am honoured to mark the celebration of Police Week 2000. I invite all members of the House to join with me in recognizing the contribution of our police officers and police services in this province. Police Week is an opportunity for us to say that we care about the men and the women who continue to risk their lives every day to make Ontario one of the safest places to live, work, and raise your family.

We recently honoured our fallen officers by creating the Ontario Police Memorial here at Queen's Park. I'm happy to say that many of us in this chamber were present at that ceremony. As the Premier and I sat there and looked back at the crowd, we were able to see the faces of the families, wives and children who have lost their loved ones who had served in the service of this province, sometimes 15 or 20 years ago.

But as I looked back and saw these families crying and weeping to see that their loved ones had finally been honoured, I knew that this memorial was a very worthwhile thing for all of us to have supported. The people who were there had personal memories of all the brave officers who are listed on the memorial. These are our heroes. These are the people who gave their lives in the line of duty.

Recognizing Police Week is yet another way of saying we will remember, but Police Week will also honour today's heroes, the police officers who put their lives at risk every day to protect all of us. Police Week is a time to stop and think about the people who make our lives safe. It's a time to think about the men and women who make it safe for us to drive home to our families every night. It's a time to think about the men and women who protect our seniors-our parents-from scam artists. It's a time to think about the men and women who keep our children safe from sexual predators.

Police Week sends a clear message of appreciation to police officers across this province. They need to know that we all care. Colleagues, I know you all care.

This year, Police Week runs from May 14 to May 20. I urge all Ontarians to take advantage of the many special police events and open houses in their own communities. Go out and visit your local police service. Go and meet and talk to the men and women who help make this province safe. This is an opportunity for the public to understand how they can work with the police community, truly work together and truly make this province safe.

This is our chance to show that both the people and the government of Ontario appreciate what the Ontario Provincial Police and all the local police services across this province are doing to make our streets and communities safer places to live, work and raise our families.

The Speaker (Hon Gary Carr): Responses?

Mr Rick Bartolucci (Sudbury): Yesterday when the member for Brant, our critic for the Solicitor General, introduced Police Week in the Legislature, he said the following: "To the women and men of our police service, we say thank you. Thank you for the job you do day in and day out. You are appreciated and respected.

"To the families, loved ones and friends of our police officers, we say thank you. Thank you for sharing these noble women and men with us. Thank you for your patience and understanding about the career path they followed.

"To the community partners that help our police service and make their jobs just a little easier to do, we say thank you."

Certainly I am happy to support the Solicitor General, the government, the third party and my own caucus in acknowledging the excellent work our police officers do across the province of Ontario and the country of Canada.

One of the greatest honours and privileges I had as a municipal councillor in Sudbury was to serve as a police services board member. I remember only too well hiring these young, excited officers, these young men and women who were going to serve and protect. I also regret to say that I remember with much sadness the pain of acknowledging the death of Constable Joe MacDonald and Sergeant Rick McDonald from Sudbury, who were killed in the line of duty.

I support this government's initiative in following the federal government's lead in a police memorial, and I acknowledge that the people in my city and region, the city and region of Sudbury, are setting up a memorial for our fallen officers within the region of Sudbury. It is going to be called the Wall of Memories, and it will acknowledge and place in time the fine history of the eight officers who were killed in the city of Sudbury.

But there is much more work to do on all sides of the House, and I plead with the Solicitor General and this government to ensure that there are adequate numbers of police officers across Ontario: in rural areas, in northern Ontario and certainly in southern, eastern and western Ontario.

I plead with the Solicitor General to listen to the northern police services, which are asking for a northern academy of policing to be situated at the Trillium centre in the region of Sudbury. I would suggest to you that our positive responses to those types of initiatives will indeed show that everyone in this House is certainly in favour of policing and supporting our police officers.

M. Jean-Marc Lalonde (Glengarry-Prescott-Russell) : Aujourd'hui, c'est un honneur pour moi et mes collègues de l'Assemblée de souligner la Semaine de la police de l'an 2000. J'invite tous les députés à s'unir pour reconnaître la contribution de nos agents de la police et des services policiers de cette province.

La Semaine de la police nous donne une autre occasion de démontrer que nous nous sentons concernés par les hommes et femmes qui continuent de risquer leur vie chaque jour pour faire de l'Ontario l'un des endroits les plus sûrs pour vivre, travailler et élever une famille.

La reconnaissance de la Semaine de la police est une autre façon de dire que nous n'oublierons jamais le travail de nos agents de la paix. Cependant, la Semaine de la police rend honneur aux héros d'aujourd'hui-les agents de police qui chaque jour risquent leur vie pour nous protéger.

La Semaine de la police exprimera clairement l'appréciation des agents de police partout dans la province. Ils ont besoin de savoir que les gens se sentent concernés.

Voici une chance de démontrer que la population de l'Ontario apprécie ce que les services policiers et la Police provinciale de l'Ontario font pour rendre nos rues, nos collectivités et la province dans son entier un endroit où il fait bon vivre.

Mr Howard Hampton (Kenora-Rainy River): I am honoured to be able to mark the celebration of Police Week. I want to invite citizens in local communities across Ontario to attend community events and open houses to mark the celebration of Police Week.

This gives us an opportunity to say thank you to those women and men who work very hard and make sacrifices to contribute to the safety of our community, the security of our community and the safety and security of all of us. It's also an opportunity to create greater understanding of the work our police services do on our behalf.

So I invite not only members of the Legislature, but citizens from across Ontario to take

part in the open houses and the community events to mark this important Police Week.

Mr Peter Kormos (Niagara Centre): In my own riding and on behalf of the NDP caucus here at Queen's park, I'm pleased to join with the Solicitor General and all the members of this Legislature as we celebrate together, as people in positions of leadership and, yes, responsibility, the role that police officers, women and men-I tell you, in Niagara we're policed by the RCMP, by the Ontario Provincial Police, by the Niagara Regional Police Service and by the Niagara Parks Police.

I know so many of these people and I've known so many who are now retired or who have, yes, left us under circumstances that the Solicitor General refers to and that the memorial here just across the road from Queen's Park commemorates.

These same women and men who serve us and serve our communities are also the same people who are involved in Big Brothers and Big Sisters and in minor hockey and in fundraising events and activities in their communities. They're the police officers who come to our aid when we're in crisis or under attack. They're the police officers who secure the safety of our communities, of our streets and of our neighbourhoods. They're also our neighbours and our friends and our colleagues in any number of activities throughout the community.

I put this to the Solicitor General-and I join with him today in a very non-partisan way-we have incredibly high expectations of our police in this province and across this country, and we, as representatives here at the provincial Legislature and as leaders in our communities, have a responsibility to ensure that our police officers have the tools and resources to do the job that we call upon them to do on a daily basis, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Is policing expensive? Of course it's expensive, because we in Ontario enjoy the best trained police officers this province has ever witnessed. We enjoy and are privileged to have not only the best trained but the most committed and most professional police officers. We also have police officers working in a milieu where the demands and the challenges for police and policing have never been higher.

Please, Solicitor General, let's join together as well in ensuring that our police forces are adequately resourced in terms of staffing. I understand what the government has announced over the course of the last three and four years. But please, I put to you that police forces across this province still remain understaffed and therefore incapable of doing the job that those police services, those police officers want to do for their communities, for the families in those communities and for the neighbourhoods of those communities.

Let's make sure that our police officers have the physical tools. Again, does that cost money? I understand that. Our job is to explain to people in our communities that as taxpayers they can have whatever level of policing they want. But if they want the highest level of policing, and if we're going to give our cops the tools to do their job safely and effectively, and if we're going to build even safer communities, we've got to be prepared, as taxpayers, as members of those communities, to invest in our police services, to invest in our communities, to assist those police officers in doing the job that I am convinced, that I know, they very much want to do.

I look forward to visiting my local police station. Of course, with option four down in Niagara, it costs me 60 bucks a pop. You understand that, don't you, Solicitor General? But at the same time, I encourage all of our community members to co-operate and participate in policing activities during this coming week.

VISITORS

The Speaker (Hon Gary Carr): Just before we begin, in the Speaker's gallery today I am pleased to welcome Mr Jesse Flis, the former member of Parliament for Parkdale-High Park, who is here with members of the Association for Community Living.

Ms Marilyn Churley (Broadview-Greenwood): On a point of order, Mr Speaker: Yesterday marked the beginning of Community Living Week. Today the Ontario Association for Community Living held a press conference outlining issues important to them. I realize that this is short notice, but in view of the fact that there are many people here from the Association for Community Living, I would ask for unanimous consent for an all-party statement to acknowledge their hard work and commitment and to outline the concerns that those people brought forward today.

The Speaker: Is there unanimous consent? Agreed.

I take it the member will lead off and all three parties will go in order.

DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED

Ms Marilyn Churley (Broadview-Greenwood): I appreciate this opportunity, as I'm sure the many people who came down today appreciate it. I understand that it was short notice, and I appreciate everybody agreeing to this today.

As I said, the Ontario Association for Community Living held a press conference this morning. I'm going to outline a few of the things they talked about this morning at that press conference.

They called for a non-partisan commitment toward the community living vision that people with developmental disabilities have the opportunity to live in a state of dignity and share in all elements of living in the community. I cannot tell you how important this is to people.

They also mentioned that the provincial government's recent announcement of $50 million in additional funding addresses some key issues where there are gaps in support, and they are very appreciative of that $50 million. Of course, to none of our surprise, they say much more needs to be done to support the developmentally disabled. Thousands of families have raised children with developmental disabilities without much, if any, government funding. Now they are worried their adult children will have few options when their parents can no longer provide for them.

Three parents spoke eloquently about the situation they face and the help they need from government to afford the kinds of support their adult children will need as their parents age. There are more than 1,200 people currently housed in institutions, all of whom are able to live in the community and should have the opportunity. We need government support to do this.

Service agencies are struggling to deal with increasing demand for services to absorb new administrative costs and to attract and keep quality front-line workers. As I outlined in my member's statement yesterday, wages are 25% lower than they are for workers in similar sectors. These wages absolutely have to increase in order to keep the good staff they have now, as well as maintain affordable training costs, because training costs are very high, with the staff turnover, and we have to put a stop to that. One parent said this crisis will last for 20 years, as baby-boom adult children living with developmental disabilities experience the aging of their parents.

Today's parents are the first generation of parents to patriate their developmentally disabled children into the community and keep their children at home. This is a generation that has seldom asked the government for anything, and now they need our help. One parent said, "I would like to know what happens to my daughter if something happens to me." I believe she expressed the sentiments of all the parents who are with us today and of those who aren't.

Funding for these basic needs should not be dependent on the goodwill of the government of the day. They called this morning-and I echo the recommendation-that a single allocation of money is not the answer. They recommended, and I recommend, creation of a permanent planning body that will look ahead into the needs of the developmentally disabled.

In closing, I certainly do not stand today to turn this into a partisan issue. I think we would all agree that the workers who work with the developmentally delayed and their parents have done a tremendous job, mostly on their own, the workers with low pay. We're reaching a crisis now, because as the parents age, they're worried about their children. I think we should all try to work together to fulfill the recommendations that were put forward today. On behalf of my caucus, I would like to say thank you very much for all the wonderful work you have done and for coming down today to share your thoughts with us.

Hon John R. Baird (Minister of Community and Social Services, minister responsible for francophone affairs): I, like my colleague from Broadview-Greenwood, would like to take the opportunity to welcome our guests from the Ontario Association for Community Living: the clients, the people who dedicate their lives to serving their clients and the parents and volunteers who make an outstanding contribution to making community living work in Ontario.

Those of us on this side of the House perhaps see a smaller role for government, that on occasion government perhaps overreaches and tries to do too much. But providing services for people with developmental disabilities is indeed an important responsibility for government to take an active role in, and an important priority for this government, this minister and this caucus.

This government increased support in this area by $35 million last year, when my predecessor, the Honourable Janet Ecker, announced new funding, and this was followed up by new additional funding of $50 million beyond that $35 million, which was announced last week and which will be added to the base budget of the developmental services envelope served by the Ministry of Community and Social Services.

These supports will go to meet a host of challenges, some of them enumerated by my colleague from Broadview-Greenwood. There is obviously a tremendous need for residential supports, to support an aging group of men and women, in some cases 75 or 80 years old, who have provided supports to their children, and later adult children, throughout their entire lives, and who want the ability to go to sleep at night with peace of mind, knowing that when they are no longer able to care for their loved ones, support services will be there for them.

I do not believe that is too much to ask, and the announcement we made last week will allow even more services and residential supports to be available for these individuals who have made a tremendous contribution to our province and indeed to the lives of all their family members.

Part of the announcement last week provides additional support for day programming for 21-year-olds leaving our school system. Transition planning is obviously something that is incredibly important. But there have to be more opportunities for young people as they leave the school system, and this government has certainly accepted that call for action. It's something where we certainly can do more and will do more with the announcement.

The member opposite mentioned the people who work with people with developmental disabilities on a daily basis.

Throughout my travels around Ontario, whether it's visiting the St Catharines Association for Community Living, visiting the Sudbury Association for Community Living, looking at organizations in my own hometown in Ottawa-Carleton, whether it be the Ottawa-Carleton Life Skills or the Ottawa-Carleton Association for Persons with Developmental Disabilities-everywhere I have gone, I have been tremendously impressed with the dedication and the amount of energy that this committed group of men and women bring to their task every day.

These aren't people who have a job, these are people who have a vocation, and I certainly share the strong support that has been mentioned for them. Part of the announcement last week provided some additional money to deal with the wage pressures, and I'm the first to acknowledge that is a big challenge within the broader public sector.

We are also providing new funds to help meet the challenge of the fire code. There are a number of changes being proposed and that are ongoing, and this poses a tremendous burden to the developmental services sector and community living. There will be new monies to help address that challenge, and that is something we'll be moving quite expeditiously.

In addition, the announcement provided more funding for the special services at home program. This program is undoubtedly one of the most popular in government, certainly the most popular within my ministry. Visiting St Catharines, as I did last summer, I had the opportunity to sit down with one board member of the St Catharines Association for Community Living who told me about the incredible difference that a little bit of special services at home funding has made in the life of her daughter.

She went on and told me about the difference it had made, and I was really quite taken aback to realize that such a small investment could provide such a considerable benefit, not just for that individual but indeed for their whole family, and that's something I was able to take away.

Finally, I'd like reiterate this government's, and I think the three or four previous governments', strong commitment to community living. Community living has been an outstanding success over the last 25 years. If you look at the number of policy changes that have gone on between this government and the previous two governments, the fact that ongoing support for community living has existed speaks volumes when all three political parties and all three governments can indicate, not just by our promises and by our rhetoric but indeed by our actions, that we have advanced community living.

That's something that I would on this occasion, at this opportunity, like to indicate our strong commitment to continuing, to provide more opportunities for community living in the province of Ontario.

I'm pleased to say that my colleague the member for Scarborough Centre, Mrs Mushinski, will host an opportunity for all members to meet with representatives and individuals from the Ontario Association of Community Living after question period. That's certainly an opportunity I'll take advantage of.

Mr Gerard Kennedy (Parkdale-High Park): I was pleased to play a small

part in that non-partisan access today to the issue brought to us by the Association for Community Living and to the people who are part of that concept of community living for the people among us who may need to be recognized, as one of the parents put it today, as differently abled. They brought to us a challenge that not only should be non-partisan but which we should be able to firmly grasp. We're being told of something that most of us have not had to know about.

A generation, the first generation, of parents who have kept children who are differently abled, with special challenges, at home for quite a long time, for a good part of their adult life-such as two of the children we met today, 40 and 46 years old-are saying to us: "We've done what we can. It's time for these children to leave home. We have looked after them. We have done that with love and respect." I think we need to pause a bit on that.

We are part of a generation that was somehow able to encourage those parents to do that, but they're now saying they've put in that contribution, that inestimable amount of love and support, seeking and believing that we would be there-the rest of us, and us in our elected roles here today in particular, in specific-when they needed us.

They have saved us, in the deferred costs of what in past generations would have been institutional spending on these children, untold millions of dollars. But they are hitting a certain wall of strain which does not show as weariness with their responsibility but rather as the reality of the age of these parents and the implication that they need to be taken up by the rest of us. They want-and I think it's a reasonable request to my colleagues in the House, and I'm sure that everyone here that reflects can agree-to age free from the anxiety, the worry of what's going to happen to their children.

Today that has been presented to us. I'm hoping we can embrace that in the spirit in which it is brought.

Essentially, we have heard of an understanding that is starting to develop in this House around this responsibility, our responsibility. This is not just some special social service that's required. This is the other end of an obligation that has been put off. My leader has raised aspects of this question in the House before, as have the member for Windsor-St Clair and the member for Elgin-Middlesex-London, and I know all my colleagues in various parties of this House share this concern.

What we had brought to us today is not just that sense of responsibility but also something of an answer. Today we heard from the parents and the representatives that they would like us to respond to their needs in the form of a permanent planning body that would actually deal with the 1% of children born who are going to need some lifelong support, and that we, on behalf of the rest of society, pick up the rest of that challenge.

In recognition of the effort that was made today, the very dignified, quiet and maybe even understated way we heard from them in their media presentation and that I'm sure we'll hear in the reception sponsored by the member opposite-we've heard from them that this needs to start. It needs to start with us. We need to recognize what Jean Vanier says about the people among us whom we sometimes will characterize as the weakest. It's the only way we as a community can be strong: by stopping long enough to listen and learn from them.

I acknowledge and applaud the Association for Community Living for bringing that message to us today. I know my colleagues and I will be listening.

ORAL QUESTIONS

HEALTH CARE

Mr Dalton McGuinty (Leader of the Opposition): My question is for the Premier. Last week the confidence of millions and millions of Canadians was shaken when it comes to the future of medicare in Canada. Notwithstanding the overwhelming opposition of the people of his province, Ralph Klein rammed through Bill 11. I have had the opportunity since to speak to many Ontarians who are expressing some real concerns about the future of medicare in our province. They are seeking your assurances today, Premier. Will you stand up and guarantee that you will not follow Alberta's lead? Will you tell us that no private for-profit hospitals will be permitted to open in Ontario under your watch?

Hon Michael D. Harris (Premier): I think we've been very clear that our goal and our commitment are to strengthen the public hospital system. We have several billions of dollars on the table to do that. It's unfortunate that 10 years of neglect under the Liberals and the NDP have forced this kind of catch-up in the public health care system, but certainly every nickel we have put into the expansion of emergency rooms, of hospitals, has been in the public system.

Quite appropriately those hospital boards, the volunteers of the public hospital system, have indicated the strength of our commitment and their thanks that finally, after 10 years of being neglected, they found a government willing to build the public hospital system again.

Mr McGuinty: I am sure you will note that I put to the Premier a very direct and straightforward question. It's a question that is weighing heavily on the minds of Ontarians, and he did not answer it.

Premier, if you look at the record here, what you are presently contemplating in Ontario is delisting another $50 million of medically insured services. That's a total of $100 million so far under your watch that you have removed from under the umbrella of medicare and told Ontarians that it's up to them now to pay out of their pockets. I'll give you another opportunity, Premier: Will you be following Alberta's lead? They've managed to exploit some kind of a loophole. What Ontarians want to know now is, will you be following Alberta's lead, and can you please assure us that no private for-profit hospitals will be permitted to open in Ontario under your watch?

Hon Mr Harris: I think our commitment has been very clear. You have seen in our response to any questions of this nature no interest in bringing forward any permissive legislation. In fact, all of our efforts have been to support the public hospital system.

I might add that I'm a little confused by your question. I have Elinor Caplan, a former Minister of Health under the Liberal government, saying this in 1993: "We're seeing the NDP force the private sector out of the delivery of health care, all in the guise of health reform." She says, "I want to say to the minister"-the NDP minister-"that I believe there's a very important role for the private sector to play in the delivery of health and social services."

Then I have a quote from Gerard Kennedy, who was advocating the delisting of health services. He says, "We want to make sure that we take some of the non-essential stuff out of the health care system."

That seems to be the Liberal Party position.

Mr McGuinty: Premier, it's obvious you are not going to grace us with an answer to the very straightforward, very simple and very direct question. You can quote others at length, but I'd like to be able to quote you when Ontarians ask me where you stand on this important issue.

I'll tell you why I am particularly concerned, Premier: because of something you have already done. In 1996 your government changed an Ontario law that protected Ontario's health care system from those who would profit from our sick. That's Bill 26. You removed a clause in Ontario law that said, "Preference should be given to health facilities that are operated on a not-for-profit basis." You've already opened the door. We already have on our books in Ontario the equivalent of Bill 11 as a result of your actions.

Now we want to know whether you're going to walk through that door, whether you're going to follow Ralph Klein's lead, or can you provide us with an assurance today, here and now, that on your watch you will never permit for-profit hospitals to set up shop in Ontario?

Hon Mr Harris: As I indicated, I've answered the question very directly on two occasions and I've answered it to the people of Ontario. I think the Leader of the Opposition, if he wishes to hear the answer, would understand why I might not trust him to explain to the people of Ontario my view on health care. I think I am quite capable of doing that myself. I did so in 1995 and I did so again in 1999. I will be very proud to lead this party and do so in 2003 or 2004 and again later on towards the end of the decade.

Interjections.

Hon Mr Harris: But I might say I am a little bit surprised both in the yelling and screaming and interjecting and in the question to hear a party whose health care critic and former minister, and now former health critic-I think he's the critic for education now-Gerard Kennedy says "delist services." He says: "There is a role for the private sector. There has been for"-

The Speaker (Hon Gary Carr): The Premier's time is up.

ONTARIO REALTY CORP

Mr Dalton McGuinty (Leader of the Opposition): My question also is for the Premier, but we'll take it from your non-response that you are in fact intending to follow Ralph Klein's lead. That's all that means to us.

Premier, we have uncovered yet another Tory land scam. This sorry saga continues to unfold day in and day out. Here are the latest details of the latest deal.

In 1993 the real estate market was relatively inexpensive and there was a property at Jane and Steeles that was sold to a developer for $2.15 million. There was proper tender and appraisal. Three years later, in 1996, the American economy started to heat up, which meant our economy started to heat up, and the exact same property was sold for just $1.3 million. Let me make that clear: In 1993 the property sold for $2.15 million. That deal fell through. The government had it still in its hands in 1996 and sold it in a more expansive economy for $1.3 million.

In 1996 the property should have been worth more, not less. Can you tell us why it was in the interests of taxpayers that a government property that was worth $2.15 million in 1993 was sold for $1.3 million in 1996?

Hon Michael D. Harris (Premier): The minister will answer.

Hon Chris Hodgson (Chair of the Management Board of Cabinet): The Leader of the Opposition knows full well that we have called the police in to investigate certain allegations that were uncovered that may or may not be criminal or fraudulent in nature. That's the role of the OPP. We've also called in an independent audit team to review past sales and that's what they're doing.

Quite frankly, I was shocked when your colleague the member for Eglinton-Lawrence outlined your policy on the Michael Coren show. He said, "We're not forwarding information to the authorities." Why are you not forwarding information to the authorities?

Mr McGuinty: Minister, maybe you can at least try to give me a straight answer on this issue. This scandal, by the way, doesn't stop with the price. The buyer of this property was one George Damiani. This is another special deal for another special friend of the Tory government in Ontario. This is the same guy for whom you helped turn a cemetery into a gold mine which is going to enable him to score a $25-million profit when all has been said and done. But in this particular deal you gave your Tory friend the land for barely half what it cost when the market was at its lowest three years before.

It originally sold for $1.3 million. That deal fell apart. You got the property back again. You sold it in 1993 for less than that. This is another special deal for a favourite friend of the Tory cabinet. Once again, taxpayers' money is going up in smoke. Minister, how can you justify this as being in the interests of Ontario taxpayers?

Hon Mr Hodgson: Mr Speaker, as you know and the members of this House have become accustomed to hearing, quite often the Liberals' research isn't accurate. If it didn't close, it didn't sell. Nevertheless, frankly, why don't you turn this information over to the authorities? You know that we have called the police in. We have independent auditors and they will get to the bottom of it.

Mr McGuinty: Minister, there are two things in common between the first cemetery deal and this second cemetery deal: (1) your Tory friend is making a killing at taxpayers' expense and (2) you're involved in both of these deals. In the 1996 deal, the deal that I'm talking about today, a conservation authority prepared this deal. In 1996, you, Chris Hodgson, were the Minister of Natural Resources. This deal could not have gone forward without your approval, according to the conservation act. Now, this could be a coincidence, I guess, it could be an accident, if it happened just the once.

But twice the same buyer, the same obscene profits. That makes it a habit, Minister. It's not just a coincidence. It's not simply an accident. It has now become a habit. Once, an accident; twice, a habit.

Minister, I'm asking you, why is it that you continue to maintain that you are always acting in the interests of taxpayers when day in and day out we stand here in the Legislature and demonstrate the exact opposite?

Hon Mr Hodgson: I would encourage the Leader of the Opposition that if he has what he believes to be evidence of something that's not in the interests of taxpayers, he turn that over to the proper authorities. That's why we have the police involved. That's why we have independent auditors. I would encourage him to do that.

MEMBERS' COMPENSATION

Mr Howard Hampton (Kenora-Rainy River): My question is for the Premier. Earlier today you were asked by members of the media if you believed that increasing the salaries of MPPs was a good idea, and you indicated yes.

My question is this: At a time when hospitals in Ontario have a $1.8-billion deficit and your government seems to have no plan to deal with that, at a time when you're delisting $100 million in health care services, privatizing them; at a time when health care workers across the province have been told by your government that they should expect nothing more than a 2% increase, many of whom have not had an increase in six years; in that context, Premier, can you honestly tell me and can you honestly tell the people of the province that raising MPPs' salaries ought to be a priority?

Hon Michael D. Harris (Premier): I think I was responding to the legislation that required, once the books were balanced, which, I might add, is the first time for a real balanced budget-

Interjections.

Hon Mr Harris: - that the Speaker was compelled to call in an independent agency to review the MPPs' salaries.

We may be a little late in this-and I apologize-and the Speaker may have been a little late, but he didn't have all the facts and the information, because when the budget was delivered, in fact, we found out the budget had been balanced two years in a row, the first time in over 60 years. So I can't fault the Speaker. First of all, I would never do that anyway, but you cannot fault the Speaker or the Legislative Assembly, for as soon as they were aware of the balanced budget they were automatically compelled to trigger the review. I believe that is what is happening, and that's what I responded to.

Mr Hampton: Premier, you may wish to tell people that everything is in balance and in fine order, but we've had three independent reports now which indicate that child poverty is at a higher rate in Ontario than ever before, that child poverty is growing faster in Ontario than ever before. We know that there are school boards in Ontario that are faced with a situation of having to lay off teachers and special education assistants this year. We know that Ontario now has the worst environmental record in North America, except for Texas. Are none of these things a priority?

In this context, how can it be a priority to raise MPPs' salaries when all of these very pressing issues in our communities-the health care system, the education system-don't seem to warrant attention by your government?

Interjections.

The Speaker (Hon Gary Carr): Stop the clock. Member take his seat. Order. I can't hear the question being asked, and I need to hear it. I apologize to the leader of the third party.

Mr Hampton: Again I simply want to ask the Premier: When all these other issues don't seem to be a priority for your government, how can it be a priority to raise the salaries of MPPs?

Hon Mr Harris: As the member would recall, when we took office, inheriting an $11-billion deficit and a substantial deficit in funding for children's programs, for education, for hospitals, we indicated that our first priority was a 5% cut in pay. We indicated further that there would be no increase in any MPP pay until the books were fully balanced. You also know that we took our time balancing the books because we had a jobs deficit that we inherited from you and we considered billions of dollars into health care, children's programs and education more important or at least equally as important as balancing the books. We considered jobs equally as important as balancing the books.

Our record on our priorities over five years in government has been very clear. And yes, today I did respond to the automatic trigger that the Speaker enlist the services of a consultant to review MPP salaries. They have not been raised for nine years, and we did take a 5% cut under your government and a 5% cut under our government. So I think our priorities are clear. It has been health care-

The Speaker: Order. I'm afraid the Premier's time is up.

Mr Hampton: Premier, you can try to disguise it however you wish. We have people who work with the Association for Community Living here today, whose salaries are 25% below where any neutral observer, any neutral arbitrator believes they should be. Your Minister of Labour yesterday said that he believes it is appropriate and proper that the minimum wage be frozen in this province for five and a half years, as it has now been. It's now well below the minimum wage of our major trading partner, the United States.

Premier, how can it be a priority to increase the salaries of members of the Legislature when we have workers in the education field who have not had an increase in a significant period of time, when we have health care workers who are leaving the province and leaving the profession because they can be paid more elsewhere and are certainly deserving of a raise? How can this be a priority over all of those pressing health care, education and community services which have not received a raise-

The Speaker: Order. The member's time is up. Premier.

Hon Mr Harris: I think today we are third in our minimum wage, very close though to Quebec, right beside us, at $6.90. We did indicate that we thought we should wait and let others play catch-up to get to our highest rates in the province.

But I'm a little surprised at the member's question, because I recall very clearly, right after the election of 1995, I had given you my priorities. They were health care, education, children, jobs. You called me right after the election. Your priority to me wasn't children, wasn't health care, was not the Association for Community Living, was not jobs. Your first priority was: How can I get party status so I can get more money?

2008 SUMMER OLYMPICS FUNDING

Mr Howard Hampton (Kenora-Rainy River): My next question is also for the Premier. The reason the party status is important is so that I can ask you these questions on behalf of the public out there who want to know the answers. We note with interest that you have appointed the Deputy Premier and Minister of Finance to be the minister for the 2008 Summer Olympic Games in Toronto.

My question concerns the investments listed in the Fung report. Mr Fung lists a long assortment of roads, transit, cleanup of the port lands, construction of housing, which would be required to put on the Olympics. Then he lists a multi-billion-dollar price tag for these things.

We know that you're going to be running ads promoting the Olympics, but we haven't seen a financial plan from you yet on how you're going to pay for the Olympics. Our concern is that after the Olympics are over, the hard-working taxpayers would be stuck with paying for those costs.

I want to put forward a proposal today. We propose that you create an Olympic lottery to ensure that there is money available to pay for the cost of this infrastructure-

Interjections.

The Speaker (Hon Gary Carr): Order. Stop the clock.

Sorry for the interruption. The leader of the third party may continue.

Mr Hampton: Premier, since you haven't put forward a financing plan for the Olympics, we propose at the very least that you put forward an Olympic lottery so that the taxpayers of Ontario will know there is some initiative to raise the capital funding that's necessary and they can have some assurance that they won't be stuck with picking up the costs after the Olympics are over. Will you do that, Premier?

Hon Michael D. Harris (Premier): The leader has indicated that the reason he wanted party status wasn't for his own salary, which he kept, or his limousine, which he kept, and the other perks that went along with it; it was so he would have research to be able to ask these questions. I have to tell you, your research department is wasting the $2 million we're giving them through party status if this is the best you can do with questions to us today.

I would like to say, in response to the Fung report, that we are in negotiations, with Fung of course, with the city of Toronto, with the federal government, to come up with a joint response for the infrastructure. As well, on the Olympic funding, I'm a little surprised you are suggesting we cannibalize our existing lottery money, which goes to support the Association for Community Living, health care and children in the province.

Mr Hampton: Premier, all we've heard from your government so far when you've been asked about funding to cover the cost of the Olympics is a mention of more toll roads or perhaps a casino. I'm putting forward the idea of a lottery because if, as we're told, there is broad public support out there for the Olympics, then for sure there should be broad public support of this kind of funding mechanism, a funding mechanism that people can take

part in voluntarily and that we estimate, from looking at the other lotteries, could raise over $1 billion.

The problem is this: All of these things have to be built well in advance of the Olympics and they have to be paid for. If you do not have a financing plan now for the cost of these things, the fear is that taxpayers will be stuck picking up the cost. I'm going to send you over, for example, some of the design work that people have done. If you're not prepared to support an Olympic lottery, will you tell people what exactly you have in mind as a financing plan for the Olympics so that hard-working taxpayers aren't stuck picking up the costs?

Hon Mr Harris: Mr Speaker, I don't know if I can refer the question to the member from St Catharines. I see the member has passed over some tickets. I had somebody give me a gift like this once that they'd already scratched before they gave them out. There are people who give gifts like that when they give out lottery tickets.

There are two very exciting projects on the horizon that I would think all members of the Legislature would be supportive of, including those outside of Toronto. One is the over 30 years of studies on Toronto's waterfront neglect, never seeming to get the federal, provincial and municipal governments all together at any one time.

I'm very proud to be part of a third partnership where all three of us are working together finally, once and for all-maybe it's because we're a party that cares about Toronto, our capital city, I don't know-where we can finally do something for Toronto's waterfront, for traffic, for transit, for roads. We are looking at that proposal with the federal and municipal governments-

The Speaker: Order. Unfortunately, the Premier's time is up.

ONTARIO REALTY CORP

Mr Dalton McGuinty (Leader of the Opposition): My question is for the Premier. I want to return to another ORC deal, another land scandal. In 1996 you sold the Bark Lake Leadership Centre to your fishing pals, Bob and Wayne Izumi, for just $2.85 million; plus, you gave them a sweetheart mortgage, the likes of which I have never ever heard of. Not only did you not have them pay a cent down, you gave them $20,000. They bought the land for $2.85 million and you gave them a mortgage back for $2.87 million. You paid them $20,000 to take the land off your hands.

I'm not sure what kind of a lure the Izumi brothers were using that day, but one thing for sure, you took it hook, line and sinker. They reeled him in, Speaker, they landed him in the boat and, for all I know, they've got him mounted over their fireplace. Maybe that explains where he has been six days a week.

Premier, why is this deal in the interests of Ontario taxpayers?

Hon Michael D. Harris (Premier): I think the minister can respond.

Hon Chris Hodgson (Chair of the Management Board of Cabinet): The Leader of the Opposition knows full well that we've called in the police. We've also got independent auditors reviewing it. Quite frankly, I was shocked and I'm sure the people of Ontario were shocked when your colleague let your strategy out of the bag. He said, "We're not forwarding information to the authorities."

Interjections.

The Speaker (Hon Gary Carr): Order. I can't hear the answer. Stop the clock. I need to hear the answer, please, if the members would indulge.

Hon Mr Hodgson: When the member for Eglinton-Lawrence was asked why the Liberal Party did not have confidence in the OPP to investigate, the member made the comment that OPP investigations are done behind the scenes. This side of the House does not believe in kangaroo courts. You're using whatever scraps of information you can without turning over the information to the proper authorities, which is the proper thing to do. I'd just ask that if you have this kind of information, you turn it over to the authorities.

Mr McGuinty: Is this the very best they can do over there? We've got these rotten deals being uncovered throughout the province of Ontario, and they tell us that the matter is under investigation, they had nothing to do with it and they're now trying to tell us over here that somehow we're keeping evidence from the police. You're the government. You authorized all of these deals. It has nothing to do with us; it has everything to do with you.

Let's take a look at the specifics of this most delicious deal one more time. You sell the land for $2.85 million, but you give a mortgage back for $2.87 million-unheard of. You, minister, when asked to comment on this deal-and you failed to mention this in your answer a moment ago-said, "The deal stinks." You said that. You said it was a terrible deal. You said this deal should never have gone ahead. You're the guy in charge, and you said it stinks. Industry experts say this deal stinks as well.

Minister, this deal stinks. You said that. You said it stank. You said that. If it stinks so much, why-

The Speaker: The member's time is up.

Hon Mr Hodgson: I appreciate the question. As the leader of the Liberal Party knows, as warden of Haliburton county and as an opposition MPP, I was concerned about the local job impact of the NDP government's decision to close the Bark Lake facility. It was the NDP decision which I opposed. My words were poorly chosen, and I did not mean to call into question our government's decision. I apologize to the reporters for my poor choice of words.

For the last five years that our government has been in office, we have tried to ensure that the taxpayers' interests are well served. We've acted on those interests. In fact, the purpose of the audit that we've asked for-

Interjections.

The Speaker: Member take his seat. I can't hear the answer. Member for Windsor West, this is her last warning as well. I can't hear when she continues to shout across at the minister. I can't have this. Just so she's clear, this is her last warning.

Hon Mr Hodgson: We've said many times that we look forward to the auditor's findings. That way we get to the bottom of it with all the evidence. Quite frankly, this party has brought forward accusations week after week that even the Globe and Mail has gone to great lengths to show-

Interjections.

The Speaker: Member take his seat. The member for Hamilton East, that is his last warning as well. New question.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Mrs Brenda Elliott (Guelph-Wellington): My question today is for the Minister of Energy, Science and Technology. In a recent gathering with local business people in my riding, the conversation obviously turned to the great initiatives in our most recent budget, delivered by the Minister of Finance. In particular, the topics that came to mind were initiatives our government is taking to prevent brain drain and to make sure Ontario is competitive in the global marketplace.

We all agreed that one thing that is very important to Ontario's success in the future is to ensure that we have researchers and top-notch research facilities. In fact, we were paid a wonderful compliment by a very important member of my constituency, the Honourable Bill Winegard, who said, "I see a lot of programs, Minister, but Ontario has got it just right."

We have programs like the research and development challenge fund and the Premier's Research Excellence Award. What these do is help researchers by recognizing their accomplishments and directly assisting them in making the transition from scientific discoveries to commercial enterprises and opportunities for economic growth.

The budget indicated that the Ontario Innovation Trust fund is going to be tripled. I'd like to get your advice on how that Innovation Trust fund will work with both the research and development challenge fund and the Premier's Research Excellence Award.

Hon Jim Wilson (Minister of Energy, Science and Technology): Thank you to my colleague from Guelph-Wellington for the very important question.

The Ontario Innovation Trust, the Ontario research and development challenge fund, the Premier's Research Excellence Award and the skills development fund of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade all combine to bring a very powerful boost to the research and development capacity of this province, and it's part of the government's jobs agenda.

In fact, of the 138 projects and almost $200 million spent on new facilities and new equipment and rehabilitating our labs and research institutions under the Ontario Innovation Trust fund to date, about 138 projects have been funded, and they have created 828 new jobs for young scientists in this province, jobs that didn't exist a year ago. We're very proud of the fund.

That's complemented by the Ontario research and development challenge fund. It's a $500-million fund, the largest of its kind for any provincial government in Canada, and its job is to help us reverse the brain drain and attract back those Canadians who for reasons over the years, a lot to do with lack of adequate public funding, have found themselves in the United States. We've attracted dozens of those researchers back and we've very proud of the research capacity-

The Speaker (Hon Gary Carr): Order. I'm afraid the minister's time is up.

Mrs Elliott: I've seen first-hand the remarkable results of the investments in the Ontario Innovation Trust. My riding of Guelph-Wellington, and particularly with the University of Guelph, is known as an agricultural and food technology centre. In March we received in my riding an investment of $12.5 million, which will fund nine various programs, everything from food quality and safety to animal health.

What's really interesting is that we now have a new building being built on the university campus that will make the University of Guelph a forerunner in space science, both in air and in plant-growing technology in space. These are very exciting things for my riding and for the province as a whole.

I wonder what the Ontario Innovation Trust will be doing in other ridings all across Ontario that stand to benefit from this kind of exceptional program.

Hon Mr Wilson: On a per capita basis, the province takes a back seat to no other government, including the federal government, with respect to the investment we're making in research and development in the province.

The Ontario Innovation Trust and the examples the honourable member just gave are exactly the type of thing we're trying to do. As the Premier reminds us, as a cabinet and a caucus, we're trying to recession-proof ourselves.

Those economies that come up with the next medical discoveries in pharmaceutical drugs and the next treatments and indeed the cure for cancer, as have been challenged by us through the budget from the finance minister for prostate and breast cancer, those that come up with the next palm pilots or blackberries, those that come up with the next computer language or the Windows 98 platform, the successor to that, Windows 2000 and beyond-and we have that capability around Guelph and Waterloo and in Canada's scientific triangle-those that come up with the next biotechnology products, will be the economies that will do the very best as we see, which inevitably will occur, somewhat of a downturn in the North American economy and in the world, hopefully in many years' time, but we have to prepare for that.

The finance minister, through his foresight, is preparing our young researchers to reverse the brain drain and to make sure that we are the economy that comes up with those discoveries.

HYDRO RATES

Mr Sean G. Conway (Renfrew-Nipissing-Pembroke): My question is to the Minister of Finance and it concerns economic forecasting for the next six to 18 months. I read with much interest your recently presented budget with the attached budget papers. My question to you today concerns hydro rates. Few things are as important to the economic and social well-being of Ontarians as hydro rates. The Minister of Finance has over at treasury a lot of very able people who forecast inflation and a variety of other key factors that make up the economy going forward.

To the Minister of Finance, I want to ask a very direct question: What can you tell us is your expectation going forward for the next 18 months, but particularly for the calendar year 2001? What are your forecasters at treasury telling you that we can expect in residential, commercial and industrial electricity rates here in the province of Ontario?

Hon Ernie L. Eves (Deputy Premier, Minister of Finance): I think the Minister of Energy, Science and Technology can answer.

Hon Jim Wilson (Minister of Energy, Science and Technology): I appreciate the question, because it gives me an opportunity to remind our municipal partners that they have a very significant role to play with respect to the future of hydro rates in this province.

I want to say very clearly that everything the Minister of Finance, the Minister of Energy and this government have control of with respect to rates, whether it be the transmission charge or the debt repayment charge, which is currently built into hydro bills and people have been paying it for years-you'll see an announcement soon that the Minister of Finance is very sensitive to keeping rates down, and he's going to do the best he can to keep that debt, that charge, as low as possible, in fact probably lower than what consumers are paying today. So that's one component.

The next component is debt. We've paid off $3 billion of Hydro's old debt, a record repayment plan in this province over the last three years. At the same time, since June 1995, we've had a freeze on the average rate of electricity. So our companies, the crown corporations, have become more efficient, they're paying off more debt, and given that 40% of the hydro bill today is debt service charges and has been for a number of years, we're passing on those debt service charge savings dollar for dollar-

The Speaker (Hon Gary Carr): The minister's time is up.

Mr Conway: My question is to the Minister of Finance, because it was to the Minister of Finance six weeks ago that the Association of Major Power Consumers in Ontario wrote to observe that on the basis of their best forecasts and what they were being told, not from some municipal utility but from Ontario Power Generation, whose sole shareholder is Her Majesty's Ontario government-the Association of Major Power Consumers have told me that they told the minister of Finance for Ontario about six or eight weeks ago that it was their unhappy expectation that they could expect electricity rates for the industrial sector in Ontario in the year 2001 to be going up somewhere between 15% and 20%.

There were no municipal utilities involved in that.

To the Minister of Finance, my supplementary question is this: What are you saying to the Association of Major Power Consumers? Are their power rates going to be going up by 10%, 15% and 20% in the year 2001? If that is not the case, let's make it easy. In the year 2001, by how much will the residential, commercial and industrial power rates be going down for Ontario consumers?

Hon Mr Wilson: The honourable member dismisses the role of municipalities. I've talked about the things the government is doing to make sure hydro rates are as low as possible in this province; 15% to 20% of the bill is municipalities and the association points that out, I say to the honourable member.

We are asking our municipal partners not to go for a cash cow grab here, to pad your municipal budgets in a municipal election year, but to do what's right for consumers and do your part, for that 15% to 20% of the bill, to keep rates down, just like we're doing in our crown corporations and in the leadership from the Minister of Finance in all the levers we have to bring prices down in this province.

With respect to the association itself, you will note that it is that association of independent power producers and industries that is encouraging the government to move as quickly as possible with deregulation and introducing competition into the generation side, because they expect that over the long run there will be lower prices available, and for the first time in the history of this province those large industrials will be able to shop around for power. In the meantime, the government is working with the association to come up with a transition strategy so that they'll have a smooth-

The Speaker: I'm afraid the minister's time is up.

TRAVEL INDUSTRY COMPENSATION FUND

Mrs Julia Munro (York North): My question is for the Minister of Consumer and Commercial Relations. With summer just around the corner, more and more Ontarians are planning their annual family vacation. In the past, this type of planning has always included a local travel agent. Ontario's travel agents are some of the most qualified in the world. However, many of these small businesses are struggling to remain competitive in the new electronic world. Minister, would you explain to this House what some of the problems facing our travel agents are and what this government is doing to help them?

Hon Robert W. Runciman (Minister of Consumer and Commercial Relations): There is no denying that recent events in the travel industry, such as airline commission cuts and the increase in direct ticket sales via the Internet, have resulted in heightened competition for travel dollars and shrinking profit margins for many Ontario travel agents.

Earlier this month our government announced a reduction in the annual insurance premiums paid by registered travel retailers and wholesalers into the Ontario travel industry compensation fund. This reduction will amount to important savings each year for the average travel agent in Ontario. Most Ontario travel agencies are small, family-owned businesses and, given the current economic realities, a compensation fund premium reduction is welcome news for these small business people.

Mrs Munro: This is great news for Ontario's registered travel agents. Any reduction in operating costs for Ontario's small businesses is good news. Minister, you mentioned the Ontario travel industry compensation fund as the source of these reductions. Could you explain to this House exactly what the compensation fund is, and how travellers in Ontario will remain protected if we are reducing the size of it?

Hon Mr Runciman: The purpose of this fund is to reimburse consumers for travel services paid to a registered travel agent when the services are not provided. Since June 1997 the fund has risen from $4.5 million to over $15 million. It is thanks to the effective management of the Travel Industry Council of Ontario that this fund has grown, and it allows us to pass on savings directly to travel agents while still maintaining a high level of financial protection for the travelling public of Ontario. Following the premium reduction, Ontario consumers will continue to enjoy the benefits afforded to them by the existence of a well-managed, sustainable compensation fund.

GRANDVIEW TRAINING SCHOOL FOR GIRLS

Ms Frances Lankin (Beaches-East York): My question is to the Premier. Today I'm going to try to appeal to your better angel. Last Tuesday in this House you stood and did the right thing for hepatitis C victims, and I stood and applauded your efforts.

You said something quite important in your announcement to the House, and I'm going to quote you: "To dismiss their needs based on legal technicalities and arbitrary cut-offs, to treat this as a courtroom exercise rather than an issue of compassion, is an abdication of our moral responsibility as governments." It's a high standard and one I believe in, and I want you to please consider applying it to the 320 women who are survivors of the Grandview abuse. They need additional help.

The arrangement that was negotiated is now falling short. Our experience is that some of these women didn't get to counselling in time; some of them require ongoing support for counselling. We ask you one simple thing: Will you give consideration to having the government extend the deadline for access to counselling services for those women who really need it? Will you do that?

Hon Michael D. Harris (Premier): I think the Attorney General has some information.

Hon Jim Flaherty (Attorney General, minister responsible for native affairs): The member will recall that it was her government, in 1994 I believe, that negotiated with the Grandview survivors and arrived at the terms of the agreement that was reached with the Grandview survivors. I understand the concern being expressed with respect to continuing counselling.

I also understand that the administration of the Grandview agreement included the provision that therapists working with survivors would refer them to support services within the community at the conclusion of the counselling program, and I trust that is being done. If it is the member's information that it's not being done, I'd like to know about it so we can follow up on that.

Ms Lankin: That is not the issue, Minister. I hope you will try to understand that we are asking you to rectify a situation that now has come to all our attention. I haven't received an answer to the open letter I sent you, but the answer your ministry staff person put forward saying there was enough notice and the deadline is over is not good enough. These women's lives have been scarred permanently. Some of them are in counselling relationships where trust has been established. Without the financial support they cannot afford to continue that counselling.

Some of them are in communities where there aren't alternative support services They are getting a lifeline, and I mean literally a lifeline, preventing suicide. Redirecting them somewhere else is not going to meet their needs. Some of the women didn't find out about this provision in time because they are living on the margins of society. They haven't been able to access it. I don't care when this deal was signed. I'm saying that in today's real world it is not compassionate. It is an abdication of the moral responsibility of government, and I'm using your Premier's words.

I'm just asking you, please, Minister, will you undertake to reconsider the possibility of extending the deadline for these counselling services to those survivors of Grandview who need it?

Hon Mr Flaherty: I appreciate the comments by the member, the genuine concern that the member has that appropriate counselling be available to survivors of Grandview, who certainly endured great tragedies. There is supposed to be provision, as I say, in the agreement to make sure that counselling takes place. It may well be that some assistance is needed to facilitate that. Certainly the women can access any of the mental health services funded by the Ministry of Health that are appropriate to their needs, such as crisis support, psychiatrists and institutional-based services.

If there are particular instances in which that is not happening and the counselling is not happening, then I wish the member would tell me about the specific circumstances. We'll look into it and try to ensure those services are provided.

HOUSING POLICY

Mr David Caplan (Don Valley East): My question is for the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing. Sometime this session you're expected to introduce legislation to finalize your downloading of housing on to municipalities. Every day I receive the same letters and faxes you do from housing providers, from tenants, from municipalities, calling for province-wide public hearings into your pending legislation. My question to you today is simple: Will you commit, will you give me your solemn undertaking, to extensive province-wide hearings on this legislation?

Will you commit that this legislation will not be forced through this House, through the debate process at the end of the session, and that all members will have an opportunity to participate in a full, thoughtful consultation process over the summer?

Hon Tony Clement (Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing): I hope the honourable member understands this point as a parliamentarian: That is not for me to commit. That is up to the House leader; it's up to this chamber; it's up to all three parties to be involved in that. What I will commit to is this: I will represent to this House that there has been extensive consultation in the months leading up to the point we are at right now. There will continue to be consultation. There is a municipal reference group.

There is consultation, both formal and informal, with providers, as well as local housing authorities, as well as municipalities, as well as others who are interested in this file, and that consultation will continue. You have my vow on that count.

Mr Caplan: The minister's answer's a cop-out. He could decide that that would be the case. In fact, I'm not really sure he understands or even cares about the matter I'm raising, because I am aware of the secret meetings you've been having with certain selected stakeholders. You see, many of these groups are the same ones that are, I guess, under a misconception that you are going to have a full hearing process over the summertime.

They believe there should be province-wide, meaningful consultation. There are 86,000 units of housing affecting over 200,000 Ontarians. That's what's involved here. Meeting with a few stakeholders in secret meetings in Toronto just doesn't cut it. Minister, these folks work on the front lines. They live in these housing units. They know and understand what your changes are going mean. They know it's going to be a complete disaster. Surely that's worth a few days of your time and this Legislative Assembly's and the committee's time, to make sure we can at least hear from these people.

What are you afraid of, Minister? I want to give you another chance. Will you give me your solemn undertaking that we will have full and extensive public consultations across this province over the summer?

Hon Mr Clement: The answer to the question is that there will continue to be public consultation. There has been public consultation. The honourable member tries to draw a picture here of secret meetings. The honourable member would be the first one to complain if we were not consulting. There's nothing secret about it if you know about it. I can assure you they're not secret. He would be the first one to complain if we did not have these consultations. We are having these consultations. We've had them in the past, we have in the present and we will have them in the future.

We are working with the providers, with the housing authorities, with the municipalities and with the citizens of Ontario to ensure that this process, which is designed to give municipalities say for pay-I hope the honourable member is not opposed to say for pay-is seamless, fair, logical and worthy of the government of Ontario. That is my solemn vow. If the honourable member wants to be helpful, perhaps he can get on the bandwagon too and ensure that this takes place responsibly and effectively.

CONNECTING-LINK PROGRAM

Mr R. Gary Stewart (Peterborough): My question is for the Minister of Transportation. Your ministry's connecting-link program is an important initiative that cost-shares funding of construction work on municipal roads connecting two sections of municipal highway. Clearly there is a provincial role to play in the upkeep of these roads, even though they are not owned by the province.

Can you tell the House what the province intends to invest in the connecting-link program for the 2000 construction season and how municipalities across Ontario will benefit from this program?

Hon David Turnbull (Minister of Transportation): I am delighted to respond to my colleague the member for Peterborough. We will be investing $16 million in the program in this budget year. This summer's program will include 50 new projects in 41 municipalities, as well as 17 carry-over projects from last year in 16 municipalities. For cities or towns, MTO subsidizes 75% of the project. For smaller municipalities, MTO subsidizes 90% or 100% of project costs. The connecting-link program contributes to a strong and reliable transportation network.

Mr Stewart: I am pleased to hear about your ministry's efforts to work co-operatively with municipalities to fund important local projects. Can you elaborate on how the connecting-link program will benefit constituents in my riding, particularly the townships of Havelock, Belmont and Methuen.

Hon Mr Turnbull: The program will include funding for resurfacing the 1.6-kilometre

section of Highway 7 through the townships of Havelock, Belmont and Methuen. This will be valued at $250,000. These are other examples of the continuing partnership we have with municipalities. We're working together to improve Ontario's infrastructure.

HIGH-TECHNOLOGY SECTOR

Mr George Smitherman (Toronto Centre-Rosedale): My question is for the Minister of Energy, Science and Technology. Earlier today the Ottawa partnership met with our caucus, and I know they met with you and other members of the government. They told a good story about the diversification of the Ottawa economy, but they also told a cautionary tale about impending labour shortages.

Last week I had a meeting with senior officials in your ministry, as you would be well aware. They offered no solid answers with respect to this. When I asked the question, should we expect labour shortages to occur? they said that was within the realm of possibility. The announcements your government has made so far would seem to fall short.

We know that programs like ATOP and capital investments are designed to address this problem. But it would seem that Ontario's ranking of 59th out of 60 in North America in terms of investment in post-secondary education places Ontario at a distinct competitive disadvantage. What assurances can the minister provide to us today that there will not be labour shortages in Ontario's high-tech economy?

Hon Jim Wilson (Minister of Energy, Science and Technology): It's an excellent question from the honourable member, and something that is on the minds of all the people who run our high-tech companies in this province, not just those from Ottawa. We have worked very carefully and closely with the sector over the three years I have been minister, for example, and Al Palladini has worked very closely with them with his skills development fund.

Initiatives, like in the last budget, to try to retain employees we have, like the tax-free allowance for the first $100,000 in stock options-the honourable member mentioned ATOP, the access to opportunities program, in which 22,000 new university and college spaces in computer programming and computer-related courses have been opened up by this government over the last two years. That is the largest expansion of the post-secondary educational sector in the history of this province since it was invented. It's a dramatic increase and it will provide, in three or four years' time, those employees we need today.

This is an acute problem across North America. In fact, you'll find that we recruit on a worldwide basis to bring in those skilled employees. We would like to hear any suggestions the honourable members across the way have, because we want to make sure that we have the workers-

The Speaker (Hon Gary Carr): I'm afraid the minister's time is up.

Mr Smitherman: I have one suggestion for the minister. Rather than standing on his feet in the House and telling us what has been done so far, I'd like him to address and provide the assurances that the government over there gets it and that they're prepared to deal with the problem.

The president of Mitel said this morning that this is an issue that limits growth. His mandate from worldwide headquarters is very clear: He is to exceed growth, and if it cannot be done in this jurisdiction, his job is to find a place where that can be achieved. So all of the announcements that have been made so far fail to deal with the challenge that is out there.

Make no mistake, barriers to growth will not be tolerated. New jobs will be found outside of Ontario. Competitor jurisdictions are making these investments. We have spoken in this House about the distinctions between Ontario and our competitive jurisdictions; that is, that Ontario is committing far fewer dollars on a per capita basis than almost all competitive jurisdictions in North America-all but one. The suggestion to the minister is, get some dollars into the post-secondary system and produce these employees for those jobs that are about to go wanting.

I ask the minister once again to give me the assurances which the senior bureaucrats from his ministry could not, and that is that the Ontario government is prepared to provide the necessary labourers for high-tech jobs in the Ontario economy.

Hon Mr Wilson: All of our programs are designed exactly to do that, in an unprecedented way. I spoke earlier today about the Premier's research excellence awards, in which 191 researchers have received $150,000 from the government and the private sector-the largest awards in Canada. That's to make sure our best and brightest stay here. That's 191 researchers. Each one of those researchers will use that money to attract four or five other research fellows or post-doctoral students, for a total of about 700 to 800 more jobs. Those people are the fundamental people we need to train the high-tech workers of the future.

Again, there are unprecedented amounts of money going into solving this very problem, and we're starting to have success. We're reversing the brain drain. Even though the federal government-his federal cousins-and the Prime Minister continue to say there isn't a brain drain, there is one. We're doing everything we can, through unprecedented research dollars, through skills development, through ATOP-

The Speaker: The minister's time is up.

CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES

Mr Garfield Dunlop (Simcoe North): My question is for the Minister of Correctional Services. Minister, a coalition of churches has raised the issue of human dignity, wondering if superjails like the ones announced by your ministry will meet the objective of reducing recidivism. They say that the superjails your ministry has announced will not provide the programs necessary to address many of the social problems the inmates deal with. Can you please explain to the House if these accusations are true?

Hon Rob Sampson (Minister of Correctional Services): The member seemed to get in under the wire there. I certainly appreciate his question.

Of course it's not true. The Church Council on Justice and Corrections is concerned about effective programming in institutions; so am I. I think we need to have effective programming in institutions that deal with recidivism in this province, and that's what we'll do.

PETITIONS

IPPERWASH PROVINCIAL PARK

Mr Gerry Phillips (Scarborough-Agincourt): "To the Legislative Assembly of Ontario:

"Whereas many questions concerning the events preceding, during and after the fatal shooting of Dudley George on September 6, 1995, at Ipperwash Provincial Park, where over 200 armed officers were sent to control 25 unarmed men and women, have not been answered; and

"Whereas the influence and communications of Lambton MPP Marcel Beaubien with the government have been verified through transcripts presented in the Legislature; and

"Whereas the trust portfolio of native affairs held by Attorney General Charles Harnick is compromised by this continued refusal for a full public inquiry into the events at Ipperwash; and

"Whereas the promised return of Camp Ipperwash to the Stoney Point Nation by the federal Ministry of Defence and the serious negotiation of land claims by both provincial and federal governments could have avoided a conflict;

"We, the undersigned, petition the Legislative Assembly of Ontario that a full public inquiry be held into the events surrounding the fatal shooting of Dudley George on September 6, 1995, to eliminate all misconceptions held by and about the government, the OPP and the Stoney Point people."

LORD'S PRAYER

Mr Joseph N. Tascona (Barrie-Simcoe-Bradford): I'm very pleased to present a petition to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario. It reads as follows:

"Whereas the prayer Our Father, also called the Lord's Prayer, has always been used to open the proceedings of municipal chambers and the Ontario Legislative Assembly since the beginning of Upper Canada under Lieutenant Governor John Graves Simcoe in the 18th century; and

"Whereas such use of the Lord's Prayer is part of Ontario's long-standing heritage and a tradition that continues to play a significant role in contemporary Ontario life;

"We, the undersigned, petition the Legislative Assembly of Ontario as follows:

"That the Parliament of Ontario maintain the use of the Lord's Prayer in its proceedings, in accordance with its long-standing established custom."

I affix my signature in support.

CULTURAL CLUBS

Mr James J. Bradley (St Catharines): I have a petition to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario:

"Whereas cultural clubs make an outstanding contribution to our province by sharing their customs, traditions, language and arts;

"Whereas our cultural clubs are generous in their benevolent contribution to the people of their communities;

"Whereas dramatic and unjustified increases in assessment for our cultural halls have created an extreme hardship for their membership;

"Be it resolved that the Legislative Assembly urge the provincial government to reinstate the previous assessment treatment for such facilities and abandon the assessment change that is so detrimental to our cultural organizations."

I affix my signature as I'm in complete agreement with this petition.

DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED

Ms Frances Lankin (Beaches-East York): "To the Legislature of Ontario:

"Whereas Ontarians with a developmental disability are in growing danger of inadequate support because compensation to staff of not-for-profit agencies is, based on recent survey, on average, 20% to 25% less than compensation for others doing the same work in provincial institutions or similar work in other settings; and

"Whereas there are hundreds of senior parents in Ontario who saved the Ontario government millions of dollars by keeping their child with a developmental disability at home, and who are still caring for their adult child; and

"Whereas there is no place for most of these adults with a developmental disability to go when the parents are no longer able to provide care; and

"Whereas these parents live with constant anxiety and despair; and

"Whereas these adult children will end up in Ontario nursing homes and hospitals if there is no appropriate place to provide care;

"We, the undersigned, petition the Legislature of Ontario as follows:

"To significantly increase compensation for workers in not-for-profit agencies so that it is comparable to the compensation of government-funded workers in identical or similar occupations; and

"To provide the resources necessary to give appropriate support to Ontarians with a developmental disability who at present have no place to go when their parents are no longer able to care for them."

In addition to the petitions I tabled yesterday, there are another 125 signatures from residents of my riding. I affix my signature as well.

The Deputy Speaker (Mr Bert Johnson): Further petitions?

Mr John O'Toole (Durham): A couple of points, if I may. The member for Scarborough Centre today extended greetings to members of the Association for Community Living. In many respects this petition is dealing with that topic. I'm presenting the petition on behalf of the member for Scarborough Southwest, who, as you know, as a member of cabinet is unable to present these petitions.

"To the Legislative Assembly of Ontario:

"Whereas Ontarians with a developmental disability are in growing danger of inadequate support because compensation to staff of not-for-profit agencies is, based on recent survey, on average, 20% to 25% less than compensation for others doing the same work in provincial institutions or similar work in other settings; and

"Whereas there are hundreds of senior parents in Ontario who saved the Ontario government millions of dollars by keeping their child with a developmental disability at home, and who are still caring for their adult child; and

"Whereas there is no place for most of these adults with a developmental disability to go when the parents are no longer able to provide care; and

"Whereas these parents live with constant anxiety and despair; and

"Whereas these adult children will end up in Ontario nursing homes and hospitals if there is no appropriate place to provide care;

"We, the undersigned, petition the Legislature of Ontario as follows:

"To significantly increase the compensation for workers in not-for-profit agencies so that it is comparable to the compensation of government-funded workers in identical or similar occupations; and

"To provide the resources necessary to give appropriate support to Ontarians with a developmental disability who at present have no place to go when their parents are no longer able to care for them."

I'm pleased to present this petition.

SCHOOL CLOSURES

Mr John C. Cleary (Stormont-Dundas-Charlottenburgh): I have a petition to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario:

"Whereas the Kinsmen/J.S. MacDonald school is slated for closure,

"I/we, the undersigned, petition the Legislative Assembly of Ontario as follows:

"To direct the Upper Canada District School Board to remove the notice of closure for the Kinsmen/J.S. MacDonald special school facility.

"Since 1963 the special education facility has adequately served the needs of those students requiring special education programs and services throughout Stormont-Dundas-Charlottenburgh.

"Presently, the Kinsmen school meets the needs of 45 children ranging from minor learning disabilities, behavioural to more complex multi-challenges."

I've also signed the petition.

LORD'S PRAYER

Mr Toby Barrett (Haldimand-Norfolk-Brant): I have a petition on prayer, almost identical to the one read by the member from Barrie-Simcoe-Bradford and a number of other members from the government side of the House.

"Whereas the Lord's Prayer, also called Our Father, has always been used to open the proceedings of municipal chambers and the Ontario Legislative Assembly since the beginning of Upper Canada in the 18th century;

"Whereas such use of the Lord's Prayer is part of Ontario's long-standing heritage and a tradition that continues to play a significant role in contemporary Ontario life;

"Whereas the Lord's Prayer is the most meaningful expression of the religious convictions of many citizens;

"We, the undersigned, petition the Legislative Assembly of Ontario as follows:

"That the Parliament of Ontario maintain the use of the Lord's Prayer in its proceedings, in accordance with its long-standing established custom, and do all in its power to maintain use of this prayer in municipal chambers in Ontario."

I sign this petition.

MUNICIPAL RESTRUCTURING

Mrs Leona Dombrowsky (Hastings-Frontenac-Lennox and Addington): I have a petition which reads:

"To the Legislative Assembly of Ontario:

"Whereas the town of Napanee and the townships of Adolphustown, South Fredericksburgh, North Fredericksburgh and Richmond were amalgamated into the town of Greater Napanee by order of the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing dated January 1, 1997;

"Whereas the order was made pursuant to a restructuring proposal which had the required degree of support of the municipalities affected;

"Whereas the restructured proposal provided that initially each councillor would get one vote, but after December 2000 councillors from wards with more than 2,500 electors (Napanee, North Fredericksburgh and Richmond) would get an extra vote, which provision was included in

section 4.3(b)(2) of the order;

"Whereas council has applied to the Legislative Assembly to amend the order by repealing

section 4.3(b)(2) to prevent councillors from wards with more than 2,500 electors from gaining an extra vote;

"We, the undersigned residents of the town of greater Napanee, respectfully petition the Legislative Assembly of Ontario as follows:

"That the Legislative Assembly of Ontario not delete

section 4.3(b)(2) of the order of the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing dated January 1, 1997."

I'd like to submit this petition on their behalf.

HIGHWAY 407

Mr John O'Toole (Durham): I'm presenting a petition on behalf of my constituents in Durham, just to name a few: Doreen Sweetland and Susan Larsh, who are very involved in the community.

"To the Legislative Assembly of Ontario:

"Whereas the province of Ontario exempted Highway 407 east from a public hearing and then passed the Highway 407 Act to further exempt the proposed highway extension from important provincial environmental laws, such as the Ontario Water Resources Act, the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act and the fill regulations of the Conservation Authorities Act; and

"Whereas heavy equipment is now being used to clear the eastern path of the highway, without any environmental guidelines, control or monitoring;

"We, the undersigned, respectfully petition the Legislative Assembly of Ontario, as a matter of extreme urgency, to put in place such environmental monitoring procedures and controls as are necessary to prevent extreme degradation such as a bulldozer working in stream beds, and numerous other environmentally destructive acts that have been witnessed since the 407 east extension was permitted to go ahead."

I'm pleased to present this petition.

MUNICIPAL RESTRUCTURING

Mr John Gerretsen (Kingston and the Islands): I too have a petition similar to the one presented by the member for Hastings-Frontenac-Lennox and Addington and it's addressed to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario.

"Whereas the town of Napanee and the townships of Adolphustown town, South Fredericksburg, North Fredericksburg and Richmond were amalgamated into the town of greater Napanee by order of the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing dated January 1, 1997; and

"Whereas the order was made pursuant to a restructuring proposal which had the required degree of support from municipalities affected; and

"Whereas the restructuring proposal provided that initially each councillor would get one vote, but after December 2000 councillors from the wards with more than 2,500 electors (Napanee, North Fredericksburg and Richmond) would get an extra vote, which provision was included in

section 4.3(b)(2) of the order;

"Whereas council has applied to the Legislative Assembly to amend the order by repealing

section 4.3(b)(2) to prevent councillors from wards with more than 2,500 electors from gaining an extra vote;

"We, the undersigned residents of the town of greater Napanee, respectfully petition the Legislative Assembly of Ontario as follows:

"That the Legislative Assembly of Ontario not delete

section 4.3(b)(2) from the order of the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing dated January 1, 1997."

It's signed by a number of residents. I agree with it and I've signed it as well for the beautiful town of Napanee.

SCHOOL CLOSURES

Mr Toby Barrett (Haldimand-Norfolk-Brant): I have a petition entitled "Save Our High Schools."

"Whereas several area high schools have been threatened with closure;

"Whereas the Grand Erie District School Board, the Brant/Haldimand-Norfolk Catholic District School Board and Fanshawe College all have proposals to construct new school buildings in Simcoe; and

"Whereas many viable options and solutions have been proposed, publicly discussed, but not enacted;

"We, the undersigned, beseech the province of Ontario to take extraordinary steps to conduct an administrative audit and mediate a solution among the Grand Erie District School Board, the Brant/Haldimand-Norfolk Catholic District School Board, Fanshawe College and other key stakeholders to provide a student-based approach, utilizing existing school board and possibly municipal infrastructure."

I agree with an approach such as this and hereby affix my signature to this petition.

NORTHERN HEALTH TRAVEL GRANT

Mr Michael A. Brown (Algoma-Manitoulin): I have more petitions to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario.

"Whereas the northern health travel grant was introduced in 1987 in recognition of the fact that northern Ontario residents are often forced to receive treatment outside their own communities because of the lack of available services; and

"Whereas the Ontario government acknowledged that the costs associated with that travel should not be fully borne by those residents and therefore that financial support should be provided by the Ontario government through the travel grant program; and

"Whereas travel, accommodation and other costs have escalated sharply since the program was first put in place, particularly in the name of air travel; and

"Whereas the Ontario government has provided funds so that southern Ontario patients needing care at the Northwestern Ontario Cancer Care Centre have all their expenses paid while receiving treatment in the north which creates a double standard for health care delivery in the province; and

"Whereas northern Ontario residents should not receive a different level of health care nor be discriminated against because of their geographical locations;

"Therefore, we, the undersigned citizens of Ontario, petition the Ontario Legislature to acknowledge the unfairness and inadequacy of the northern health travel grant program and commit to a review of the program with a goal of providing 100% funding of the travel costs for residents needing care outside their communities until such time as that care is available in their communities."

These constituents are from Thessalon and various places along the north shore of Lake Huron.

ORDERS OF THE DAY

TAXPAYER DIVIDEND ACT, 2000 / LOI DE 2000 SUR LE VERSEMENT D'UN DIVIDENDE AUX CONTRIBUABLES

Resuming the debate adjourned on May 11, 2000, on the motion for second reading of Bill 72,

An Act to pay a dividend to Ontario taxpayers, cut taxes, create jobs and implement the Budget / Projet de loi 72, Loi visant à verser un dividende aux contribuables de l'Ontario, à réduire les impôts, à créer des emplois et à mettre en oeuvre le budget.

The Deputy Speaker (Mr Bert Johnson): Pursuant to the order of the House of May 15, I'm now required to put the question.

On May 9, 2000, Mr Young moved second reading of Bill 72.

Is it the pleasure of the House that the motion carry?

All those in favour, say "aye."

All those opposed, say "nay."

In my opinion, the ayes have it.

Call in the members. This will be a precisely five-minute bell.

The division bells rang from 1552 to 1557.

The Deputy Speaker: All those in favour will please rise one at a time and be recognized by the Clerk.

Ayes

Arnott, Ted

Baird, John R.

Barrett, Toby

Beaubien, Marcel

Chudleigh, Ted

Clark, Brad

Clement, Tony

Coburn, Brian

Cunningham, Dianne

DeFaria, Carl

Dunlop, Garfield

Ecker, Janet

Elliott, Brenda

Eves, Ernie L.

Flaherty, Jim

Gilchrist, Steve

Gill, Raminder

Guzzo, Garry J.

Hardeman, Ernie

Harris, Michael D.

Hodgson, Chris

Johns, Helen

Klees, Frank

Marland, Margaret

Martiniuk, Gerry

Maves, Bart

Mazzilli, Frank

Molinari, Tina R.

Munro, Julia

Mushinski, Marilyn

Newman, Dan

O'Toole, John

Ouellette, Jerry J.

Runciman, Robert W.

Sampson, Rob

Snobelen, John

Spina, Joseph

Sterling, Norman W.

Stewart, R. Gary

Stockwell, Chris

Tascona, Joseph N.

Tilson, David

Tsubouchi, David H.

Turnbull, David

Wettlaufer, Wayne

Wilson, Jim

Witmer, Elizabeth

Wood, Bob

Young, David

The Deputy Speaker: All those opposed will please rise