Newfoundland and Labrador Hansard — Members' Statements; Statements by Ministers — 25 May 2015 (47th General Assembly, 4th Session, Vol. XLVII No. 19)
2015-05-25
Newfoundland and Labrador — Debates (Hansard)
PDF Version
May
25, 2015
HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY PROCEEDINGS
Vol. XLVII No. 19
The
House met at 1:30 p.m.
MR. SPEAKER (Verge):
Order, please!
Admit strangers.
would like to welcome all members back to another week of orderly debate in
the House of Assembly.
Today I would like to recognize and welcome representatives from the
Conservation Corps Newfoundland and Labrador, along with Executive Director,
Darren Feltham.
Welcome to the House of Assembly.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
I would also like to
recognize and welcome Early Childhood Educators: Mary Walsh, Joanne Morris,
Gail Brinston, Valerie Collins, and Helen Sinclair.
Welcome to the House of Assembly.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
Statements by
Members
MR. SPEAKER:
Today we will hear
members' statements from Members representing the Districts of St. George's
Stephenville East, Signal Hill Quidi Vidi, Carbonear Harbour Grace,
Humber East, Virginia Waters, and St. Barbe.
The
hon. the Member for St. George's Stephenville East.
MR. REID:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
rise today to make the House aware of an important project being undertaken
by Writer Director Michael Fenwick and a team of film students at the
College of the North Atlantic in Stephenville.
The
important project they are working on is to bring the story of the life of
legendary Newfoundland musician Emile Benoit to the screen.
Students and instructors of the Film and Video Production Program at
the College of the North Atlantic have held a casting call for people to
help create the history by becoming part of the short film about Emile
Benoit.
Emile Benoit was the talented French-Newfoundland fiddler from Black Duck
Brook known for his unique style of fiddling, along with his wit and charm.
The crew has been chosen, script written, all characters are
established, and a number of lead roles and extras have been selected.
would like the House to join with me in recognizing the important work of
program instructors Peter Buckle, Keith Bonnell, Michael Fenwick, the
students involved, and all those who have come forward to participate as
cast members. I look forward to
the film, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Signal Hill Quidi Vidi.
MS MICHAEL:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker.
One
of the most prestigious awards Canada offers to its young people is the Duke
of Edinburgh's International Award.
Established in Canada in 1963, the tri-level non-competitive program
encourages youth to set and achieve goals in the areas of community service,
skills, fitness, and adventure.
Anyone who has been involved with a Duke of Edinburgh achiever can sing the
praises of the program and tell you stories of how any given individual has
learned new skills, made a difference in the community, or achieved an
athletic goal they once thought impossible.
particular note is the COSTA initiative, which opens the Duke of Edinburgh
Program to students with intellectual and physical disabilities.
Last
Thursday, youthful achievers from all over the Province congregated at the
CLB Armory to receive their Gold Level Duke of Edinburgh's Award from
Governor General David Johnston.
Eleven of them live in my District of Signal Hill Quidi Vidi and I would
like to recognize of them by name.
Congratulations to Garrett Barry, Alexandria Batten, Megan Clarke,
Joseph Eddy, Amber Hodder, Julia Outerbridge, Sarah Predham, Camille
Quirion, Abby Robbins, Alex Robbins, and Sean Winsor.
ask all hon. members to join me in congratulating them.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Carbonear Harbour Grace.
MR. SLADE:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr.
Speaker, on April 23, 2015, I had the pleasure of attending the Town of
Harbour Grace Annual Awards ceremony where the town recognizes many of its
finest citizens. The ceremony is
dedicated to the many volunteers, athletes, and members of the community who
are actively involved in the community.
Mr.
Speaker, I especially want to recognize Courtney Coombs who won both the
1992 Newfoundland and Labrador Summer Games scholarship and the Doris
Murcell Memorial Award as the female athlete of the year.
She had previously won this award in 2012.
Courtney is an all-around athlete who excels in both competition and the
classroom. She is active in
soccer, volleyball, ball hockey, and cross-country running.
She is an avid multi-sport athlete and is attending her first year of
university.
The
Town of Harbour Grace is very fortunate to have young people like Courtney
and also Adam Slade, who was chosen as the male athlete of the year.
They are the future of our communities and our Province, and to be
recognized with such prestigious awards is a testament to their abilities.
Mr.
Speaker, I ask all hon. members to join me in congratulating Courtney and
wish her all the best in her future athletic and academic endeavours.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Humber East.
MR. FLYNN:
Mr. Speaker, on Thursday,
May 21, the Duke of Edinburgh Award honoured program achievers who have
entered their Gold Standard at a ceremony with His Excellency the Right
Honourable David Johnston.
Since 1974, when the program was first introduced in Newfoundland and
Labrador, the Duke of Edinburgh Award has been instrumental in helping
thousands of young people develop qualities of leadership, personal
discipline, and strength of character.
Currently in our Province we have some 3,500 young people registered
in the program, which is the highest per capita number of any Province in
Canada.
I am
very proud today to recognize three individuals from the District of Humber
East, Dianna Alteen, Maria Filatre, and Marli Ver Mooten, who received the
Gold Standard Award at a ceremony on Thursday.
To achieve this award, these young people were required to set and
accomplish personal goals within an eighteen-month period in five different
areas which include service, skill, physical recreation, adventurous
journey, and residential project.
also want to thank the many adults involved in the program who offer
guidance and support to all of these young people.
ask hon. members to join me in congratulating Dianna, Maria, and Marli, and
all the achievers in this fantastic accomplishment.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Virginia Waters.
MS C. BENNETT:
Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
rise in this hon. House today to recognize a pioneer in many ways; Ms
Rosemary Marshall who will be inducted into the Newfoundland and Labrador
Hockey Hall of Fame 2015. Ms
Marshall was among the first female minor hockey coaches in this Province,
and the first to serve as President of the St. John's Minor Hockey
Association.
She
was the only female in her class when she obtained her Level II coaching,
before forming an atom-age team in St. John's and went on to take a club to
the 1972 provincial competition in Labrador City.
In 1976, the Canadian Amateur Hockey Association named her as an
outstanding minor hockey award winner.
Recognizing the need for more ice surfaces, she played a major role in the
construction of Twin Rinks and held the position of secretary for the Avalon
Arenas Association. After the
passing of her husband, Doug, in 2005 she joined with her sons, Steve, Ken,
and Ian, in the sponsorship of the Doug Marshall Hockey League.
She
was also the first female to serve as President of Sport Newfoundland and
Labrador.
ask all hon. members to join me in recognizing the legacy of Ms Marshall's
involvement in youth sports.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
St. Barbe.
MR. J. BENNETT:
Mr. Speaker,
Hospitality Newfoundland and Labrador hosted the annual Tourism Excellence
Awards 2015 on February 26, recognizing the outstanding tourism leaders and
businesses that make great contributions to the provincial tourism industry.
The Gros Morne region, in the St. Barbe district, won big.
Ocean View Hotel, Rocky Harbour, won the H. Clayton Sparkes Accommodator of
the Year Award. This award
recognizes an individual who exhibits dedication to quality service and
makes a solid contribution to the community.
Gros
Morne Co-operating Association won the JAC Tourism Champion of the Year
Award. This award is presented
to an individual, company, or organization that has worked diligently to
ensure that the tourism industry prospers.
Bonne Bay Marine Station, Norris Point, won the Sustainable Tourism Award.
This award recognizes an industry operator who has made strides in
sustainable tourism practices and continually works toward the protection of
our natural and cultural resources.
Mr.
Speaker, I ask all members of this hon. House to join me in congratulating
Ocean View Hotel, Gros Morne Co-operating Association, and Bonne Bay Marine
Station on winning these prestigious Tourism Excellence Awards.
Thank you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
Before we go to statements by ministers, I would like to take this
opportunity to recognize one of our own.
Last Thursday afternoon one of our Pages, Raylene Mackey, was
presented with the Caring Canadian Award by the Right Honourable David
Johnston, Governor General.
The
Governor General's Caring Canadian Award was created in 1995 to recognize
individuals who volunteer their time to help others and to build a smarter
and a more caring nation.
Raylene's citation reads: Raylene Mackey has been a golf coach for Special
Olympics athletes, and has contributed her time to St. Luke's Home.
As a former Miss Teen Newfoundland and Labrador, she has improved the
lives of others through a diverse range of volunteer activities at over 160
events across the Province. She
continues to volunteer today with several local organizations.
Along with Raylene, there were ten other recipients of this prestigious
award: Nitish Bhatt, Frank Millar Ewing, Dolores Flynn, Betty Gulliver,
Josephine Anne Hickey, Keith Hillier, David Regular, Madelene Small, Melissa
Thomas, and Ian Walsh.
Please join with me in congratulating Raylene and all the other recipients.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
Statements by Ministers.
Statements by
Ministers
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Premier.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
PREMIER DAVIS:
Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
I am
pleased to rise today in this hon. House to acknowledge the designation of
Thomas E. Ricketts as a Person of Provincial Significance.
Mr.
Speaker, I had the honour yesterday to participate in the designation
ceremony in Conception Bay South.
It was a humbling experience to stand before men and women who wear
the uniform of the Royal Newfoundland Regiment, as well as all other
officers who serve in our Canadian Forces.
I commend each of them for their ability to stand up for those whose
daily lives are embroiled in conflict.
are all familiar with the story of Thomas E. Ricketts, or as he is better
known, Tommy Ricketts, as we have come to know him.
Tommy Ricketts was a teenager from Middle Arm, White Bay, who joined
the Newfoundland Regiment during the First World War as a fifteen-year-old
boy. He went on to receive the
Victoria Cross the highest award for valour the British Empire could grant
a soldier for his actions during an offensive in Belgium.
Tommy Ricketts was the youngest soldier serving with the British Army
during The Great War to receive the Victoria Cross and 100 years later we
still honour his legacy.
Mr.
Speaker, as we commemorate Tommy Ricketts, it is also important to take a
moment to remember that during The Great War more than 6,000 men joined the
Newfoundland Regiment and more than 12,000 served on land, in the air, on
the sea, and in nursing services.
It was for reasons such as these that the Provincial Historic
Commemorations Program was developed, to recognize aspects of our collective
culture and to pay tribute to the people, places, events, and traditions
that make Newfoundland and Labrador unique.
further honour Tommy Ricketts' memory and to commemorate his legacy of
valour, the Department of Municipal and Intergovernmental Affairs has
provided $25,000 towards the community park in Conception Bay South, a park
that will stand as a legacy of Tommy Ricketts' service for years to come.
Mr.
Speaker, the sacrifice of Tommy Ricketts and the brave individuals who
served is an important part of our collective identity, of who we are today
as Newfoundlanders and Labradorians.
Their sense of duty shall never be forgotten and we are honoured to
commemorate them in this way.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Conception Bay South.
MR. HILLIER:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
thank the Premier for an advance copy of his statement.
Having been part of the ceremony yesterday, it is certainly an honour
today to be able to stand and speak to this particular project.
As a
high school teacher, Mr. Speaker, I taught fifteen and sixteen-year-olds,
and I fully understand how unprepared boys like Tommy Ricketts were when
they marched off to war in 1914-1915 but how they subsequently accredited
themselves in the European theatre of war.
Mr.
Speaker, this $25,000 will be a good kick start to our new Tommy Ricketts'
park in Conception Bay South which we are proud to develop in his memory.
Yesterday was a strategically scheduled event, and I wonder how many
more with subsequent financial announcements will take place as we get
closer to a fall election.
Thank you very much.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Signal Hill Quidi Vidi.
MS MICHAEL:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker.
too, am honoured to stand with the Premier and the representative from CBS
and honour Tommy Ricketts and his fellow soldiers
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MS MICHAEL:
so many of whom were
very young and who fought in World War I.
The Great War was also known as the war to end all wars, a reflection
of the hope of people of the time.
One hundred years on, we know that hope was in vain, young Canadian
men and women are still being sent into armed conflict.
hope as we honour Tommy Ricketts and the sacrifices of so long ago, that we
also hope for a time when such sacrifices are no longer required of our
young people.
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
The
hon. the Acting Minister of Early Childhood Development.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. S. COLLINS:
Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
rise in this hon. House today to proclaim May 24-May 30 as Early Childhood
Educators' Week in Newfoundland and Labrador.
This week is a time to recognize the significant contribution child
care professionals make in our Province.
Early childhood educators are the skilled professionals who are responsible
for planning and delivering effective play-based curriculum to our children
in the critical early learning years.
Each and every day these educators recognize and build on a child's
natural curiosity and imagination and evoke their learning through
activities such as dramatic play, art, and social games.
Newfoundland and Labrador, we are fortunate to have over 1,200 practising
ECEs working in many different settings and providing a variety of services.
Early childhood educators work in regulated child care centres and
family care centre homes. They
work as business operators, in family resource centres, private consulting
practices, and government departments.
No matter what setting, early childhood educators bring their passion
to educate children to the work that they do.
Their commitment and dedication truly deserve the recognition that
this week places on their profession.
Mr.
Speaker, during this week, our Province's early childhood educators will
have the opportunity to participate in professional development sessions, as
well as open houses at child care centres and also have the opportunity to
network with their colleagues and share best practices.
recently had the pleasure of meeting and talking to representatives from the
Association of Early Childhood Educators in Newfoundland and Labrador to
proclaim Early Childhood Educators' Week.
Their commitment and dedication to their profession was very evident
throughout our conversation. The
provincial government is very supportive of our early childhood educators
and certainly the work they do.
I look forward to working with them to further develop and improve early
learning and child care services in this Province.
Today, I ask all hon. members to join me in recognizing and thanking all
early childhood educators in this Province for the essential role they have
in ensuring the youngest members of our population have the best possible
start in their lifelong learning and education.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
St. John's North.
MR. KIRBY:
Thanks to the minister
for an advance copy of his statement.
The Official Opposition, Liberal caucus, joins the minister in
wishing a happy Early Childhood Educators' Week to all of the ECEs in
Newfoundland and Labrador.
ECEs
play a vital role in our education system and increasingly they are
recognized for their vital role.
One of the best ways that we can ensure early childhood educators are
properly compensated for their work the best way to recognize them for
their work is to properly compensate them for their work.
In that regard we are woefully behind as a Province, despite all of
the evidence that investing in early year's education is an economic
investment.
know that for every $1 invested there is a short-term return of up to $1.80
and a long-term return of up to $17, particularly for at-risk children.
Despite that, Newfoundland and Labrador has the lowest wages paid for
ECEs.
It's
Time for Preschool report recently suggested that we had the lowest salary
levels amongst all of the provinces.
That report pointed out that we spend just 1.3 per cent of our Budget
on ECEs. We have a long way to
go, Mr. Speaker, but once again, I am happy to
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
remind the member his time has expired.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Signal Hill Quidi Vidi.
MS MICHAEL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
too thank the minister for the advance copy of his statement.
I am honoured to recognize and praise the highly skilled and
dedicated early childhood educators we have in this Province.
I wish them success in their activities this week, and I hope people
throughout the Province get to see what is going on.
I am
glad to see government acknowledging their contribution to our Province, but
I urge government to do what it should do, and what would really be
acknowledgement, and create an affordable and accessible public child care
program that will pay good salaries to the early childhood educators,
provide benefits to the economy, and take care of the needs of the families
of our Province.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
The
hon. the Minister of Environment and Conservation.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. CRUMMELL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr.
Speaker, I rise today in this hon. House to acknowledge the important work
of Conservation Corps Newfoundland and Labrador.
The
Conservation Corps is a provincial, charitable organization dedicated to
providing youth with training and employment in environmental and cultural
heritage conservation. It was
created in 1992 with the goal of increasing quality employment, training and
career development opportunities for young people.
Since its inception, Conservation Corps has employed more than 2,500
people through its Green Team, Intern, and other employment programs.
2002, the Conservation Corps became the host organization for the Climate
Change Education Centre, which has become a leader in the field of climate
change education and outreach.
Since its inception, the centre has been very successful in reaching various
target audiences and increasing their capacity to understand and engage in
actions aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
One
of these key target audiences continues to be youth and to that end, the
centre offers a Who's in Charge of Climate Change program in schools.
Through funding support of $147,000 obtained from the Department of
Environment and Conservation last year, the centre was able to reach over
11,000 individuals in 485 classes throughout the Province.
addition, the use of the Climate Change Club storybooks in Kindergarten to
Grade 6 continues to create a value-added educational package that schools
find very useful. The program
format includes all participating classes enjoying a reading of one of the
stories, followed by a short PowerPoint presentation and class discussion.
Programming for junior high and high school classes is continually evolving;
presentations are updated as severe weather events occur, new
climate-related data is released and significant discoveries are made.
As the Province continues to experience the effects of climate
change, these direct links are added to presentation materials to ensure
students can relate to the issues and understand the impacts at a local
level.
Mr.
Speaker, these are just a few examples of the way the Conservation Corps,
through the Climate Change Education Centre, is spreading the message to our
youth about climate change, and their outreach efforts extend to other areas
as well. For example, the centre
has delivered energy efficiency and climate change presentations to various
programs of the Stella Burry Community Services and the Association of New
Canadians.
The
provincial government is a proud sponsor of this important organization, Mr.
Speaker. In fact, in addition to
the funding provided through my department, approximately $580,000 was
provided last year through the Department of Advanced Education and Skills
to support its many initiatives.
ask all hon. members to join me now in applauding the Conservation Corps for
their important work and wishing them all the best as they continue with the
public education and outreach initiatives.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
The Straits White Bay North.
MR. MITCHELMORE:
Mr. Speaker, I thank
the minister for the advance copy of his statement and I acknowledge the
good work of the Conservation Corps.
Education plays a vital role in raising environmental awareness, so I am
excited to see a Green Team discuss and pursue the limestone barrens
stewardship project, particularly in my district.
Programs like the Climate Change Club teach children about
environmental issues from an early age, giving them a foundation to become
good environmental citizens as they grow up and leading them to take actions
that will reduce their impact on the environment.
important as education is, actions are equally important, and this
government has cut positions at Burnt Cape Ecological Reserve, they have cut
Nature's Classroom, and they have an atrocious environmental record.
When we look to this government for action on environmental issues
like climate change, we see they are not taking the leadership role that
they should be. When will we see
the greenhouse reduction strategy on sector-by-sector emissions and a plan
for action that will have real impact for this Province?
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
St. John's Centre.
MS ROGERS:
I, too, thank the
minister for the advance copy of his statement.
Congratulations to the Conservation Corps for their work educating
students about climate change and greenhouse gas emissions.
Across the Province they have worked hard for many years making people aware
of how to reduce emissions. They
rank second in Canada in energy audits completed per capita and had the
highest proportion of rural community audits in the country; but I ask, Mr.
Speaker, who is in charge of climate change in Newfoundland and Labrador?
Where are government's targets for greenhouse gas emissions?
This is government's hypocrisy at its worst, but I do congratulate
the young folks at Conservation Corps.
Bravo for their work; keep up the good work.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
Oral Questions.
Oral Questions
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for Virginia Waters.
MS C. BENNETT:
Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
November of last year the Premier instituted a discretionary hiring and
spending freeze on all departments in government.
ask the Premier: Is the spending and hiring freeze still in place?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Finance and President of Treasury Board.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. WISEMAN:
Mr. Speaker, the member
is right; last year the Premier provided some leadership to the people of
the Province and announced that we were going to be putting in place a
strategy to ensure that we eliminated all non-discretionary spending and we
were very selective on our hiring process.
We wanted to make sure that we hit our financial targets for the end
of the year.
Since that time, we have had a new Budget introduced in this House.
In fact, we are debating it as we speak now, Mr. Speaker.
This Budget, when the House approves it, will actually be the
blueprint that will help us focus our spending decisions into the year
coming and, in fact, into the next five years.
Spending from here on through, Mr. Speaker, will be guided by this year's
Budget; but, always, these are prudent financial decisions.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
The
hon. the Member for Virginia Waters.
MS C. BENNETT:
Mr. Speaker, I will
ask the minister again: Is the discretionary spending freeze and hiring
freeze in place now as part of this Budget process?
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Finance and President of Treasury Board.
MR. WISEMAN:
Mr. Speaker, let me
answer it again. As always
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MR. WISEMAN:
all of the decisions
that we make as a government reflect prudent fiscal management, so we will
make decisions on hiring and spending throughout this year and for the next
five years and we will be guided by a blueprint, and that blueprint is the
Budget.
Several weeks ago I read into this House a Budget for this year, but also
read out in this House and laid out for the people of Newfoundland and
Labrador a plan for the next five years, Mr. Speaker.
We will be guided both in our day-to-day decisions as a government by
that fiscal plan, our expenditure decisions by department and by agency will
be guided by that fiscal plan, and it reflects prudent decisions and prudent
spending.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Virginia Waters.
MS C. BENNETT:
Mr. Speaker, what I
heard the minister say was a confirmation that the spending and hiring
freeze is no longer in effect.
The Budget documents his government have presented indicate a 1.7 per cent
increase in spending over last year.
ask the minister: When you are going to borrow $1.1. billion, why did you
not maintain a spending and hiring freeze?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Finance and President of Treasury Board.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. WISEMAN:
If the member opposite
would want to check public commentary, Hansard in this House, she would
recognize very clearly, as would members of this House and the people of
Newfoundland and Labrador, the notion of having a hiring freeze and a
spending freeze, that was not the terminology used in the fall, Mr. Speaker.
What the Premier had said at the time was that we were going to
eliminate non-discretionary spending.
still have a government to run.
We have programs and services to provide to the people of Newfoundland and
Labrador. We need to recruit new
people to work in our health system.
We need to recruit new people to work within our Department of
Transportation and Works because they are having a summer construction
program.
So,
we need to carry on the business of government, providing valuable services
to the people of Newfoundland and Labrador, and we will make prudent
spending decisions and sometimes it will involve recruiting the kind of
talent that we need to do the job, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Bay of Islands.
MR. JOYCE:
Mr. Speaker, government
has admitted that the dome over Muskrat Falls is only half completed, and
plans for it to be finished have been scrapped.
ask the minister: What is the status of the dome, and how much of taxpayers'
money was spent on this structure?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Natural Resources.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. DALLEY:
Mr. Speaker, that is a
repeat question, so I will try to give the same answer I gave a few weeks
ago. The decision on the dome
was Astaldi's to try to advance production in the building of Muskrat Falls.
They built half the dome and then they decided to not build the other
half, and pick up in other ways in terms of productivity.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MR. DALLEY:
So that was the decision,
Mr. Speaker, but as I said at that time there are no additional costs to
taxpayers. That is a cost to
Astaldi. So, there is no
additional cost. They have built
half to use for half the powerhouse.
The other work is going to be done the spring and the summer in hopes
of adding additional batch plants to pour more cement.
that is their approach, Mr. Speaker, but no additional cost to the project
and no additional cost to ratepayers.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Bay of Islands.
MR. JOYCE:
Mr. Speaker, government
has decided not to finish the dome construction and will leave units three
and four uncovered. They say it
will not affect the path to the first power in 2017.
So I
ask the minister: If the dome is not needed, and with such oversight as this
government claims, why was it approved as a necessity for construction and
ensured no delays?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Natural Resources.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. DALLEY:
Mr. Speaker, Muskrat
Falls is one of the biggest projects, I guess, most important projects, we
have ever done in our history.
The decisions to build Muskrat Falls are well documented, very public.
Also, which is very well known, is that Nalcor is building the
project, and they have project managers hired and a team through Astaldi and
so on.
the decision not to finish the dome was not a government decision, Mr.
Speaker. Nalcor made the
decision as project manager in the best interests of the project.
Our focus, Nalcor's focus, as directed, is to build the project, try
to keep it on time, and try to keep it on budget in the best interests of
the ratepayers of the Province.
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Bay of Islands.
MR. JOYCE:
Mr. Speaker, it is our
environment that will be further damaged because of mismanagement of this
government. It has been stated
in this House on many occasions that waste management is on schedule.
ask the minister: How can such an important issue be pushed down the road
another four years with continuous damage to our environment?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Municipal and Intergovernmental Affairs.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. HUTCHINGS:
Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
Mr.
Speaker, there is nothing being pushed down the road by this government.
We were the government that initiated the waste management strategy.
The prior Administration brought it in with no detail, no money, and
nothing engaged in that strategy.
It was us who brought it in, in 2007, outlining clearly what we
needed to do in this Province.
We have a modern waste management strategy.
built on that to date. We have
spent $161 million in infrastructure in various parts of the Province,
working with the community in building a state-of-the-art infrastructure
project. Over the next number of
years, to 2020, we will spend an extra $61 million again in infrastructure
to complete the facilities, those depots we need around the Province for
waste management. From a
composting point of view, we recognize due to increased costs and our
financial situation, we will push that out for another five years to 2025.
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MR. HUTCHINGS:
We will continue to
work collectively on a waste management strategy, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Bay of Islands.
MR. JOYCE:
I say to the minister,
that is little comfort to a lot of towns that are paying a lot higher costs
now, dumping fees, and a lot more dumping sites being established all over,
illegal dumping sites a lot less comfort.
hear from this government how important the environment is.
We see major increases in dumping fees, transfer of sites being
delayed again, and illegal dumping increasing.
ask the minister: With continuous delays, broken commitments, and false
expectations, how can the people of the Province have faith in your waste
management strategies?
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Municipal and Intergovernmental Affairs.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. HUTCHINGS:
Mr. Speaker, the
faith in our strategy is the demonstrated work we have done since 2007,
quite clearly, throughout Newfoundland and Labrador.
As I said, it is a $161 million investment, $60 million-more that
will be invested between now and 2020.
We have built infrastructure in all regions of the Province to
continue to build on the waste management strategy.
As I
said, we were the government that identified the waste management strategy,
the details around it, and the dollars from the taxpayers of Newfoundland
and Labrador that we would do to build that strategy.
We are committed to it.
His
reference in regard to transfer stations being delayed is incorrect.
A tender will be closed the end of this month.
There will be $30 million for six transfer stations for the West
Coast that will be built and hopefully ready within the next twelve months.
So we are moving forward with a waste management strategy, and we
will see it completed in the years to come, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Trinity Bay de Verde.
MR. CROCKER:
Mr. Speaker, the
Agreement on Internal Trade helps ensure movement of people, goods,
services, and investment within Canada, but the provincial government has
withdrawn from ongoing negotiations on this agreement.
The minister says even though they are not at the negotiating table,
they are in constant communications with people at the table.
ask the minister: Who are you in constant communications with, and who is
representing the Province's interests at these negotiations?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Business, Tourism, Culture and Rural Development.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. KING:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
appreciate the question. For the
benefit of the member, the director of trade agreements for our department,
Jeff Loder, represents us at the bureaucratic level.
I represent the Province, as the minister, at ministerial meetings,
which we are participating in.
The
member's question is a little dated.
We have meetings coming up in early June, which I will be
participating in, and my director will be participating in fully.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Trinity Bay de Verde.
MR. CROCKER:
Mr. Speaker, all our
provincial economic indicators are pointing in the wrong direction.
Our economy is contracting, but with almost 78 per cent of our
economy dependent on international trade alone, this government has decided
to withdraw from all trade negotiations.
ask the minister: If our Province is not at the negotiating table, who is
representing us and the Province's interests on these important economic
issues?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Business, Tourism, Culture and Rural Development.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. KING:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Obviously, the member did not listen to the answer I provided.
We are at the table. I
just said that a few moments ago.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MR. KING:
I am sitting at the table
and our director of trade policy sits at the table.
To be clear, we have never reneged on our right to sit at any table
where we had provincial jurisdiction to negotiate on behalf of the people of
the Province we represent.
What
we have said, Mr. Speaker, in light of the failure of the federal government
to live up to their agreement with us on the fisheries fund through the CETA
dispute, is that we will no longer provide the federal government with the
opportunity to negotiate away any rights that we own as a Province.
to be clear, we have never said we will not negotiate as a Province, but we
will not give the right to the federal government to negotiate on our behalf
until such a time as they honour the CETA agreement and the fisheries fund
deal.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
St. John's South.
MR. OSBORNE:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Government recently released a tender for several million dollars' worth of
roadwork on the Trans-Canada Highway.
The problem is it calls for a new polymer mixture.
This new mixture is not readily available to contractors as it is not
supplied by the main suppliers in this Province.
Not
only has the government not put out early tenders as they promised, Mr.
Speaker, now they put out a late tender without consulting with local
industry. There was no prior
notice provided to the industry and no way for the industry to prepare for
the use of this new asphalt.
Why
would the minister call for tenders without proper consultation with
industry stakeholders to ensure they are prepared for such a huge change?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Transportation and Works.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. BRAZIL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
want to make it clear to my hon. colleague across the floor; we have a great
working relationship with the industry, Mr. Speaker.
Only this morning I spoke to their executive members and we had a
dialogue around how we move forward on this project and many other projects.
I will be meeting with their executive and a number of the proponents
involved in this industry on Friday morning.
Prior to that, on Friday when there seemed to be some issues around the
availability of some of the particular contractors to get 2,000 tons of
liquid asphalt, I extended the contract until June 2, so we could have that
dialogue. We could have that
continuous dialogue going on.
might note that in 2013 we called for a tender that had 900 tons of liquid
asphalt. This one calls for
2,000, an increase, Mr. Speaker, of
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
remind the member his time has expired.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
St. John's South.
MR. OSBORNE:
Yes, Mr. Speaker, he had
a meeting because the industry is upset.
The
closing date for the tender was extended because the industry was caught off
guard. The asphalt that he has
talked about just now, Mr. Speaker, is different asphalt than the asphalt
they used last year. If the
industry was given enough notice and was properly prepared to use this new
asphalt, they would probably support it and you would not have an industry
that is upset and frustrated today.
Will
the minister commit to changing the specifications to use the traditional
asphalt that was used last year and every other year for this particular
year's roadwork and allow the industry time to adjust to the changes that he
proposed in the recent tender?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Transportation and Works.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. BRAZIL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
want to make it clear, the changes in using liquid asphalt is not something
new. We have been doing it when
we did work on the Outer Ring Road two years ago around the rutting.
It is a better quality of asphalt, Mr. Speaker, to ensure safety on
our highways, particularly in high traffic areas.
That is what this Administration is all about and it is what my
department and the 1,700 staff are all about, ensuring safety on the roads.
are working with the industry, Mr. Speaker.
Last year we did contracts with 10,000 tons of liquid asphalt in
Labrador. We are going to look
at doing 2,000 tons here. If it
is a problem for the industry
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MR. BRAZIL:
we will have those
discussions. We will find a
solution that works for everything, but I want to make it clear, safety on
our highways, particularly high traffic areas, is our most important option
here, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
The Straits White Bay North.
MR. MITCHELMORE:
Mr. Speaker, hunting
and trapping is a way of life in this Province.
Young people are best enabled to learn these skills at a younger age
and being mentored by adult family members, yet government regulations deter
young people from actively participating as we have the highest age
restrictions for hunters in the country.
ask the minister: What is government doing to address these age restrictions
and allow more youth to participate in hunting?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Environment and Conservation.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. CRUMMELL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr.
Speaker, growing up in rural Newfoundland and Labrador, when I turned
sixteen the first thing my father did, he bought me my first gun.
I did the same thing for my son.
So I hear what the member opposite has to say.
I have been in consultations with various industry groups.
are talking about the possibility of moving forward on this, Mr. Speaker,
but we are gathering information.
We need to do more consultations.
We need stakeholders out there to come out and talk about this.
It is a bit of a gap right now from where we are.
We are open to talking about this and we are looking at it.
Thank you very much.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
The Straits White Bay North.
MR. MITCHELMORE:
It certainly sounds
like lack of action, Mr. Speaker.
Firearm safety and hunter education courses start at age fourteen, but big
game hunting is restricted until eighteen.
In other provinces, young people can hunt with adult family members
starting at twelve for small game and fourteen for big game.
Resident hunters are taking their youth to other provinces and
non-resident hunters are not bringing their youth here for hunting trips to
the Province.
ask the minister: Will you listen to hunting groups in the Province and
lower the hunting age limits to be in line with the rest of the country?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Environment and Conservation.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. CRUMMELL:
Mr. Speaker, we have
great programs in this Province to help young hunters learn the skills of
their forefathers. This week
coming up, the rod and gun clubs here in St. John's and in Deer Lake are
going to be participating in youth shooting competitions and skills
competitions.
are aware of the differences of what is happening in other jurisdictions.
Mr. Speaker, we are having a hard look at that.
Coming from my background, it is a keen interest for me.
I have communicated this to industry stakeholders, outfitters, and as
well as other industry groups, outdoors organizations.
Mr.
Speaker, we are having a very serious look at this.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
St. John's North.
MR. KIRBY:
Mr. Speaker, CBC is
reporting yet another case where a family has been shortchanged by
government's botched Inclusion Strategy.
When he was asked to comment, the Acting Minister of Education said
he was pleased to see that parents were making up for the shortcomings of
the Inclusion Strategy by paying for a private tutor for their child.
ask the acting minister: If everything is working so well with your
Inclusion Strategy, why did the NLTA have to force your department to create
a joint committee to review it?
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Acting
Minister of Education and Early Childhood Development.
MR. DALLEY:
Mr. Speaker, several
years ago our government adopted the Inclusive Education Initiative where we
would deliver to our children in our school system special services under
the lens of an inclusive approach.
We are doing that. We are
engaged with stakeholders.
think we have had tremendous success, but I would be the first to say, as
minister, there are challenges in the system.
There are always going to be challenges.
What we do need, though, is to recognize that collectively we all
have a responsibility.
reference to my CBC interview, I am always pleased to see parents engaged
with their kids in education because I believe with the work of parents,
with supporting their kids, along with the stakeholders we have, we are
going to have the best possible education system we can have.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
St. John's North.
MR. KIRBY:
On the contrary, Mr.
Speaker. The fact of the matter
is, government forced its own idea of inclusion onto our schools several
years ago. It lacked funding, it
lacked student supports, and it lacked a vision for student success.
After years of public outcry about that, I do not know where the acting
minister has been he has not heard about it, but the NLTA finally forced the
government to form a joint committee to review the inadequate implementation
of inclusive education in this Province.
ask the acting minister now: Will you provide an update, table an update,
here in the House of Assembly on this inclusive education review that has
been going on since last September, I understand?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Acting
Minister of Education and Early Childhood Development.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. DALLEY:
Mr. Speaker, we believe
there is wide support for inclusive education.
We believe that as a society we all have a responsibility to
recognize those with exceptionalities, those with disabilities, and give
them the same chance as everybody else.
That is what inclusive education is about, Mr. Speaker.
What
the member is suggesting here is that we do away with inclusive education
and we go back to segregation, because that is the difference in the two.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MR. DALLEY:
We either bring them in
the classroom and support them and give them the supports they need, which
is what we are doing to work with parents and to work with our stakeholders,
or we stick them out into a classroom like we used to, because that is what
the member is suggesting. Stick
them out in a classroom like they used to.
are not going to support it, Mr. Speaker.
We are going to support the kids and do all we can.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
St. George's Stephenville East.
MR. REID:
Mr. Speaker, since the
Budget, I have asked the Minister of Advanced Education and Skills several
questions related to the future of the Safety and Emergency Response
Training Centre in Stephenville.
Recently, I met with employees at the search centre who report that
contractual staff have been told their contracts will not be renewed, and
other staff there are concerned about the long-term viability of the centre.
ask the minister: What actions has he taken to ensure the long-term
viability of this centre?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Advanced Education and Skills.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. JACKMAN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
will point out, the Member for Port au Port is having discussions with me
around the centre as well, Mr. Speaker.
would like to inform the member that I have spoken to people and had staff
discuss with people at the Marine Institute around this, and I can assure
the member the facility is not in danger of closing.
Mr.
Speaker, they do as do other institutions, you review, you revamp, and you
reorganize, making it more effective.
In this case, that is what the Marine Institute is doing.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
St. George's Stephenville East.
MR. REID:
Mr. Speaker, the contract
training done at the search centre in Stephenville has been negatively
impacted by the short-term downturn in the natural resource sector as
companies try to contain costs.
ask the minister: Is he concerned that making drastic changes to the search
centre at this point based on short-term issues might lead to the loss of
highly skilled instructors who would be hard to replace in the future?
That would compromise the centre's ability to respond to future
opportunities. Is he concerned
about losing the staff?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Advanced Education and Skills.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. JACKMAN:
Mr. Speaker, what I am
concerned about is we have a facility that is current, meets the need of
industry, and continues ongoing dialogue with industry, revamping their
education program so that the facility becomes the strongest that it
possibly can. I have no doubt
that the Marine Institute has been a proven leader in their field, and they
will do the same here, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Humber East.
MR. FLYNN:
Mr. Speaker, the Honour
100 Initiative commemorates the sacrifices of Newfoundlanders and
Labradorians who served in World War I.
A check of the Honour 100 website leaves a curious impression.
A number of events are planned for 2014 but still nothing listed for
ask the minister: Can he update us on the events planned for this year?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Business, Tourism, Culture and Rural Development.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. KING:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
have not seen the website myself recently, so I will certainly endeavour to
have staff to update the website for the member for future Question Periods
so he will be armed with a list of events that we are planning on pursuing.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Humber East.
MR. FLYNN:
As a part of the 100
initiative, government launched a program valued at $600,000 for community
heritage projects focused on World War I.
The deadline to make application for these grants was in February of
this year.
Since we have heard nothing from the government about the program, I ask the
minister: How many community groups have applied for this funding, and what
sorts of projects have been funded?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Business, Tourism, Culture and Rural Development.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. KING:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
appreciate the member once again raising the issue.
As I have said a number of times in the House, it is a very important
investment that this government has made because we recognize the value of
engaging our citizens in remembering the history of our Province.
I think I have mentioned to the member before that we are actually
taking a huge delegation of youth this year from right across the entire
Province of Newfoundland and Labrador to Beaumont Hamel as part of that
particular trip.
The
projects that the member speaks to, I do not have the detail in front of me.
Unlike other governments, this government is not into operational
issues like that. We have
officials who deal with those things.
Once projects are selected for approval, then I become aware of a
number of applications and those who are successful.
When that occurs, I suspect over the coming weeks, we will certainly
make members aware and make members of the public aware.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Signal Hill Quidi Vidi.
MS MICHAEL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
This
evening there will be a major rally in Labrador City to support the 150
workers losing their jobs at IOC.
In February the Premier visited Labrador West and would not meet with
the steelworkers' union that represents the workers.
ask the Premier why he did not bother to meet with Steelworkers Local 5795.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Premier.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
PREMIER DAVIS:
Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
can tell you that the circumstances and matters that are occurring in
Labrador West, I consider them to be very serious.
It has significant impact on not only the company, but its employees,
a large number of employees, and also the community itself.
We have already seen the challenges that exist in the iron ore
industry, Mr. Speaker, and we are seeing what is taking place now and
watching what is taking place now between the company and its members.
Mr.
Speaker, I was in Labrador West earlier this year, and I did engage in
conversations with stakeholders in Labrador West.
The union representative did not indicate a desire to meet until very
late in trip and I could not accommodate that at that point in time.
My officials have been engaged with representatives of employees and,
as well, a mediator has been assigned and has been making progress in the
last number of months. We hope
that both sides can continue to make progress together.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Signal Hill Quidi Vidi.
MS MICHAEL:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker.
Well, it sounds like he has no intention of meeting with them, which is
disgraceful. There are currently
2,400 outstanding grievances from the union that IOC is ignoring 2,400
thereby creating a toxic work environment.
ask the Premier why he has not answered the steel workers' request for an
industrial inquiry to investigate IOC's poor labour relations.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Premier.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
PREMIER DAVIS:
Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
industrial inquiry is an option that is being considered, Mr. Speaker.
I can tell you I have been in discussions as recent as coming before
the House this afternoon with the MHA, the Member for Labrador West, who is
in Labrador West today instead of being here in the House.
He continues to have ongoing discussions with both stakeholders,
representatives of employees and also with the company.
He is on the ground doing the work in his own district, where he
should.
Mr.
Speaker, we assigned a mediator from the Labour Relations Agency.
From an arm's length point of view, this is a matter directly between
the employees and the employer.
We have a mediator. Together
they are making progress. They
are meeting more regularly now than they ever have before.
We are hoping that they are going to be able to continue that, but we
are looking forward to a further update on that.
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
St. John's Centre.
MS ROGERS:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
just returned from a press conference where thirteen eminent groups,
including Research Exchange Groups at MUN, the Social Justice Co-op of
Newfoundland and Labrador, Council of Canadians, and the Port au Port Bay
Fishery Committee raised concerns that government's fracking panel is not
representative. There are no
women, no Aboriginal people, no one from the West Coast, and no medical and
health researchers and specialists on it.
They are very concerned about the lack of true consultation.
ask the minister: Will he agree to meet with these concerned groups to hear
the very important and valid concerns that they have raised?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Natural Resources.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. DALLEY:
Mr. Speaker, there is a
process ongoing where an independent panel has been appointed highly
regarded people who we feel are independent of the fracking issue, but
obviously bringing experience and knowledge.
understand the fact that you cannot have a panel with every aspect
represented, but what you can have, Mr. Speaker, is a panel that provides a
process for everyone every one of these groups, everybody who has an
opinion to make sure they share that, share their research, and share their
facts with the panel. The panel
will do their due diligence with that work and provide a report back to
government.
will make it public. Eventually,
Mr. Speaker, government will make a decision with respect to fracking.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
St. John's Centre.
MS ROGERS:
Mr. Speaker, the minister
knows that this panel is not representative of the Province and it does not
include
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. member has time
for a quick question.
MS ROGERS:
Mr. Speaker, I ask the
minister: Will he instruct the reconstituted panel to include a health
impact assessment of fracking for the people of Newfoundland and Labrador?
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Natural Resources has time for a quick reply.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. DALLEY:
Mr. Speaker, the panel
was put in place because of the current concern for the health and safety of
people of the Province. That has
been clear. It has been clear to
the panel. As I have said
before, it is independent. As
minister, I am not going to intervene with the work of the panel.
The decision on fracking has not been made.
This government has not decided we are going to frack or not frack.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
The
time for Question Period has expired.
Presenting Reports by Standing and Select Committees.
Tabling of Documents.
Tabling of
Documents
MR. SPEAKER:
In accordance with
section 19(5)(
a) of the House of Assembly Accountability, Integrity and
Administration Act, I hereby table the minutes of the House of Assembly
Management Commission meetings held on February 24 and March 5, 2015.
Also, pursuant to
section 8 and
section 10 of the Public Tender Act, I
hereby table a report of Public Tender Act exceptions for the month of March
2015, as presented by the Chief Operating Officer of the Government
Purchasing Agency.
Further tabling of documents?
Notices of Motion.
Notices of Motion
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Port au Port.
MR. CORNECT:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
give notice that I will move, seconded by the hon. Member for Baie Verte
Springdale, the following private member's resolution:
IT RESOLVED that this hon. House condemns and seeks the immediate reversal
of the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans decision to divide the
172.8 ton increase in the halibut quota equally among eight groups, instead
of respecting this Province's traditional share of 29.1 per cent a
decision that will reduce the additional share available to Newfoundland and
Labrador from fifty tons to about twenty-one tons.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Government
House Leader.
MR. KING:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
give notice that the motion just put forward by the hon. member will be the
private member's motion debated this coming Wednesday.
MR. SPEAKER:
Answers to Question for
which Notice has been Given.
Petitions.
Petitions
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Carbonear Harbour Grace.
MR. SLADE:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
the hon. House of Assembly of the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador in
Parliament assembled, the petition of the undersigned humbly sheweth:
WHEREAS on average there are over 700 moose-vehicle accidents in the
Province of Newfoundland and Labrador each year; and
WHEREAS approximately 10 per cent of those accidents result in serious
injury or fatality; and
WHEREAS moose-vehicle accident mitigation measures like moose fencing, brush
cutting, and hunting quotas have reduced accidents in other provinces, in
particular, New Brunswick;
WHEREUPON the undersigned, your petitioners, humbly pray and call upon the
House of Assembly to urge the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador to
increase moose-vehicle accident mitigation measures, including moose
fencing, brush cutting, and increasing quotas to provide financial
assistance to those most seriously injured as a result of said collisions.
in duty bound, your petitioners will ever pray.
Mr.
Speaker, I had the privilege over in Whitbourne on Thursday night to attend
a SOPAC meeting. I have to say
that group of people are wonderful people to bring the issue of moose
accidents to the forefront. I
would just like to say that the past president, they were all very good
and we have a new president of that organization, Mr. Brent Cole, and I
would like to congratulate him.
The
SOPAC group are not asking for anything out of the way here.
We went with the moose detectors.
They did not seem to work.
That cost us $1.4 million from what I can understand; anyway, it
did not work. There is a lot of
information out there within the department where those moose actually come
out to. If the government would
even consider making an approach to it or making a start at it to identify
the areas where the moose do a lot of crossing, to make a start on some
fencing.
These people are not asking you to go right across Newfoundland and Labrador
with fencing; these people are asking you to look at the circumstance of
where the accidents actually take place and to make a start on it, Mr.
Speaker. So if you took it and
you made a process on it and you made a start on it, then we can continue on
each year. These people are not
asking for anything and at all points in time, they have the best interest
of the residents of Newfoundland and Labrador at hand.
So, that is what these people are looking for, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you very much.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Trinity Bay de Verde.
MR. CROCKER:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
the hon. House of Assembly of the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador in
Parliament assembled, the petition of the undersigned humbly sheweth:
WHEREAS the community of Northern Bay is a significant tourist attraction in
the District of Trinity Bay de Verde; and
WHEREAS the site of a commercial building was destroyed by fire several
years ago; and
WHEREAS the remains of this fire still exist along Route 70 in Northern Bay;
WHEREUPON the undersigned, your petitioners, humbly pray and call upon the
House of Assembly to urge the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador to
ensure the necessary cleanup occurs.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MR. CROCKER:
As in duty bound, your
petitioners will ever pray.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker, for the opportunity to stand this afternoon on
behalf the people of the District of Trinity Bay de Verde.
A number of years ago a fire destroyed a commercial building located
directly across from the entrance to Northern Bay Sands.
For those in the House who do not know, Northern Bay Sands is
probably one of the largest tourism attractions in the District of Trinity
Bay de Verde, with tens of thousands of visitors every summer.
This
past Saturday, I had the opportunity to spend most of the day on the North
Shore involved in a community cleanup organized by Stella Johnson from
Northern Bay. While we were
there we took some time to look at the site of the former commercial
building. Just last week, I had
the opportunity to speak to the minister about this building and he assured
me he would have his officials go and take a serious look at it.
This
fire happened, I think, it was three years ago and the remnants of the fire
still stay there today. It has
even gotten to a situation where what is starting to happen now is people
are using it for a waste disposal site.
They are bringing in other garbage and leaving it on the site of this
former commercial building.
Mr.
Speaker, I call upon the government and I ask the minister to please, as
soon as possible, go to Northern Bay, look at this situation, and take the
necessary steps that are required to clean this up.
Not only is it an eyesore, it is a safety concern with large metal
objects, sharp objects, and so forth.
Also, there are environmental issues.
It is surrounded by running water.
Again, Mr. Speaker, I ask the minister to immediately have a look at this
facility.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Cartwright L'Anse au Clair.
MS DEMPSTER:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
To the hon. House of Assembly of the Province of
Newfoundland and Labrador in Parliament assembled, the petition of the
undersigned humbly sheweth:
WHEREAS Route 510 from L'Anse au Clair to Red Bay is in
deplorable condition and requires immediate upgrading; and
WHEREAS the condition of the highway is causing undue
damage to vehicles using the highway and is a safety hazard for the
travelling public; and
WHEREAS both residential and commercial traffic has
increased dramatically with the opening of the Trans-Labrador Highway and
increased development in Labrador; and
WHEREAS cold patching is no longer adequate as a means
of repair;
WHEREUPON the undersigned, your petitioners, humbly
pray
SOME HON.
MEMBERS: Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MS DEMPSTER:
and call upon the House of Assembly to urge the Government of Newfoundland
and Labrador
SOME HON.
MEMBERS: Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
I ask members for their co-operation.
MS DEMPSTER:
to immediately allocate resources to Route 510 from L'Anse au Clair to Red
Bay that allows for permanent resurfacing of the highway.
As in duty bound, your petitioners will ever pray.
This is not a new petition, and the problems still
persist. I was thinking as I
drove over it again this past weekend and I am zigzagging out around and I
am jamming the brake, very dangerous, big jagged potholes, many, many times
I have talked about the people who have to drive over this pavement that is
almost forty years old,
that is extremely dilapidated, that to my knowledge is not even on the radar
yet to be resurfaced.
have talked about the school children who have to be bused over this, the
ambulance people; but, as I was standing to speak, I thought of something
else. They are not residents,
but they are very important people in our Province; their Honours are coming
to the district and I am going to be hosting them in the district for
several events this weekend. On
Thursday and on Friday the Lieutenant Governor and his wife are going to
drive on this road, Mr. Speaker.
It really concerns me for their safety.
They are driving over a road they are not used to.
It is absolutely atrocious.
Maybe if I start on Monday, maybe by Wednesday we can get another few bags
or a tractor trailer load of cold patch down just for some interim
life-saving measures there, Mr. Speaker.
It is really is that bad; I am not exaggerating.
The road is atrocious.
This past week was the first time I have driven over it in weeks that I have
not lost a tire.
Mr.
Speaker, I know that there are three projects that are ongoing right now in
Labrador the infamous eleven kilometres after the bungle from Humber
Valley Paving is still not done; that is being finished.
I know there is some pavement on the Goose Bay north end and there is
widening and upgrading north of Lodge Bay; but this road has to be
addressed, it has to be factored in, it is a danger to the travelling
public, to the residents who live there.
We are coming into tourist season and we are going to have people
driving and towing motorhomes.
Mr.
Speaker, I am fearful to say it, but it is a matter of time and lives are
going to be lost on Route 510.
Thank you.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Conception Bay South.
MR. HILLIER:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
have a petition for brush clearing on the Manuels Access Road.
the hon. House of Assembly of the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador in
Parliament assembled, the petition of the undersigned residents of
Newfoundland and Labrador humbly sheweth:
WHEREAS Route 2 on the Conception Bay South Bypass Road is the second
busiest highway in the Province; and
WHEREAS we must ensure the safety of the residents who use the access road,
especially when driving at night; and
WHEREAS brush clearing can reduce the risk to drivers from the local moose
population;
We,
the undersigned, petition the House of Assembly to urge the government to
allocate funding to include brush clearing for the Manuels Access Road.
Mr.
Speaker, this is a petition that I have brought forward on several
occasions. As I said, this is
the second busiest highway in the Province, some 20,000 to 30,000 vehicles a
day. We have been looking for
brush clearing here for some time. Our
last response from the Minister of Transportation and Works is that yes, in
the next batch of tenders, there may be brush clearing for this
section of
highway.
Mr.
Speaker, the last batch of tenders as I have mentioned here before, there
we nine projects all nine went to government districts.
will just give you an example.
When you leave the Manuels Arterial Road and take Pitts Memorial Drive down
towards St. John's, we have the District of Kilbride on our right, the
District of Paradise on our left, and the first thing we see is that brush
is cleared from the median going down to the highway.
Then brush is cleared to prevent moose coming off the Glencrest
development. Then as we go
further towards town, brush is cleared to keep moose from coming out of the
backyards of Southlands. We turn
around and come back, we pass Admiralty Woods and brush clearing is done on
the backyards of Admiralty Woods to keep the moose from coming out of the
backyards of those houses.
Mr.
Speaker, as we get up into Ruth Avenue, the brush is cleared in the median
in Ruth Avenue, to keep the moose from coming off the parking lot of Bigs
they hang out there at Bigs all the time.
As we come further towards Conception Bay South
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MR. HILLIER:
brush is cleared to
keep moose from coming out of Donovans Industrial Park.
It is time for us to get some brush clearing.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MR. HILLIER:
Thank you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
There are many private conversations going on.
The Speaker is having trouble hearing the person recognized to speak.
I would ask again for all members for their co-operation, please.
The
hon. the Member for Conception Bay South, to continue.
MR. HILLIER:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
As I
was saying, we are taking a trip from downtown and working our way back
towards Conception Bay South, and following where the brush has been cut.
The last area I mentioned was Donovans Industrial Park, Mr. Speaker.
With all the moose coming out of Donovans Industrial Park it is a
danger coming along the highway, and I ask that government give us the same
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
remind the member his speaking time has expired.
The
hon. the Member for The Straits White Bay North.
MR. MITCHELMORE:
Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
the hon. House of Assembly of the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador in
Parliament assembled, the petition of the undersigned humbly sheweth:
WHEREAS the Strait of Belle Isle is a very important transportation link
between Labrador and the Island of Newfoundland; and
WHEREAS both commercial and residential traffic is continuously increasing
because of the opening of the Trans-Labrador Highway, and increased
developments in Labrador; and
WHEREAS the existing ferry service can no longer effectively handle the
traffic; and
WHEREAS there have been many interruptions in the ferry service, especially
during the 2014 winter season;
WHEREUPON the undersigned, your petitioners, humbly pray and call upon the
House of Assembly to urge the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador to
complete a comprehensive feasibility study for a fixed link across the
Strait of Belle Isle that would include a geological assessment and a full
cost analysis.
in duty bound, your petitioners will ever pray.
Mr.
Speaker, any society that has ever developed and thrived has been developed
on advanced transportation links.
If we look at what is happening and what Quebec is doing, they are
investing in Route 138. There
are hundreds of millions of dollars in the Plan Nord under a Liberal
government in Quebec that is looking at moving transportation north.
No matter what happens, transportation will flow north.
So we have an opportunity to act and create a great circle route.
The
petitioners here are asking for government to take on and conduct a
comprehensive feasibility study to look at what the geology is like and a
full cost analysis. What we had
was a pre-feasibility study that is not as comprehensive in terms of
information.
we look at the opportunity that exists, we look at in St. Anthony there is
international shipping.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MR. MITCHELMORE:
If you talk about
being able to come in through Labrador, go across the Strait of Belle Isle
in a fixed link and come down the Great Northern Peninsula, you could go to
St. John's and you could end up going out through Argentia, or you could
come right down the West Coast and go through Port aux Basques and make that
great circle route, how transportation can flow effectively.
Just like how government is saying this is how electricity is going
to flow, we have to make sure that goods and services and flow of people can
also be moved in a similar way.
This
is why we really do need I have been speaking up for having Newfoundland
and Labrador connected by a fixed link for quite some time.
I certainly support it.
Government does not know how much it is going to cost because government is
not willing to even do a feasibility study; yet, it will do feasibility
studies and cost analysis for a number of other projects they have put
forward.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MR. MITCHELMORE:
So they do not have
the interest, Mr. Speaker, on that side of the House to look at advancing
transportation networks in Newfoundland and Labrador.
The Quebec government certainly does.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
Orders of the Day.
Orders of the Day
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Government
House Leader.
MR. KING:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
would like to call from the Order Paper, Motion 1, that the House approves
in general the budgetary policy of the government, the Budget Speech.
MR. SPEAKER:
We are continuing debate
on the Budget Speech, the amendment.
recognize the hon. the Member for Signal Hill Quidi Vidi.
MS MICHAEL:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker.
I am
very pleased to have the opportunity to once again speak to the Budget; a
Budget that we have been dealing with here in the House now for a number of
days; a Budget which causes great concern to us and to people in the
Province; a Budget which this government is bringing in and has brought in
and we are debating, which is making the people of the Province pay for
their errors, making the people of the Province pay for the situation we are
in, in this Province with regard to our fiscal situation, making the people
of the Province pay for their poor planning.
That is what this Budget it all about, Mr. Speaker.
The
$1 billion deficit is a deficit on the backs of the people because this
government spent the last year since 2003, this party has been in
government. They have been here
for something that has never happened in our Province before.
They are here because they themselves took the money that has been
earned by the workers of this Province, the money that has been earned in
the offshore, the money that has come in, and they spent it without any
planning.
That
is the problem, Mr. Speaker, they spent it without any planning, no planning
for the future. Knowing they are
dealing with a resource that we have no control over in terms of the money
it brings in, knowing the oil that comes from our offshore is something that
is part of a whole global system, and they and we or nobody else has control
over how much money that is going to bring in; yet, spent it since 2003.
Yes, it did some wonderful things.
I am not going to deny we needed a lot of work done.
never had this money before but it still should have been spent with
planning for the future, knowing that at any moment with the fluctuating
prices for the price of oil, that we could be in the situation we are in.
It was not a surprise to anybody else, yet they behave as if: Oh, my
goodness, look at what happened.
All of a sudden the price of oil dropped.
Well, that is what happens to the price of oil.
Yes, it will go back up again and then it will drop again.
have a Budget they are calling
Balancing Choices for a Promising Future .
Well, I have read this Budget.
I have read so much of the Budget, the Budget Speech itself.
I read the Speech from the Throne, that happened before the Budget.
I have read the documentation that goes with it.
We have started the Estimates.
would like to know what the promising future is that the government is
talking about and I would like to know what the balanced choices are,
because it seems to me the balance is against the people of the Province,
Mr. Speaker. This is what really
disturbs me. The balance is
against the people of the Province.
would like to talk about some of the things that are in the Budget and how I
see them affecting people in this Province and how I see them affecting
people in my District of Signal Hill Quidi Vidi, Mr. Speaker.
one of their documents, one of the Budget papers is called Investing in
Health and Wellness. The
government talks about, Recognizing the importance of ensuring there is
sufficient capacity to meet a growing need for long-term care, Budget 2015
provides approximately $700 million in long-term care and community support
services, including home support and personal care homes.
They
then go on and talk about all the ways in which they are going to spend that
$700 million, but because the government has not put plans in place, because
they have not done careful mapping out of the needs and put a whole program
of long-term care and home care in place, their Budget is hit and miss.
Let me talk about some of the misses, Mr. Speaker.
They do not like to hear about the misses but the misses are there.
Let's talk about a couple in my District of Signal Hill Quidi Vidi where
the man of that couple is in poor health.
He himself has a bad heart condition.
He underwent surgery for that heart condition and he requires home
care. What happens is his wife
gets ill. She goes into
hospital. She goes through her
treatments in hospital and she is told she can go home.
She said, well, I cannot go home, I need help.
I have to be taken care of.
Well, you have a partner, you have a husband,.
Yes, but my husband requires home care himself and he has his come
care. He cannot take care of me.
So,
she sits in a bed in the hospital for two to three months trying to get this
sorted out. She is being told,
well, if you are not going to go home you have to go into a long-term care
facility. She said, but if I can
manage at home with home care, why can't I get home care?
She was told, well, your husband has home care.
Mr.
Speaker, that is a miss, and that is a real situation.
That family did not give up.
Eventually somebody used their head inside of the health care system,
and eventually somebody realized let's get the home care in place.
It did happen. So now
both of those people are at home and they are getting the home care they
need.
Mr.
Speaker, why should they have to go through that kind of situation?
Months of being in torture, months of being unhappy, months of
feeling insecure, months of not being together as a couple.
This is not acceptable.
When government talks about $700 million in long-term care and community
support services, they do not think about planning.
is the same way, Mr. Speaker, that we saw today.
We had family members, people outside the House of Assembly today,
and they were protesting. Why
were they protesting? Because
they are the parents of children who are autistic.
What were their signs saying?
Their signs were saying: inclusion, not exclusion.
What did that mean? Those
signs were getting at another example of where this government takes one
step, does not do planning, does not do an analysis, and makes a mess of
things.
When
they started inclusion in the educational system, when they started their
wonderful model of all students at all times being in a classroom together,
called it inclusion, and then did not put the resources in place to make
inclusion work. What one of the
mothers outside today said to me: It is not inclusion, Ms Michael, it is
exclusion. Because when my son
acts up, when my autistic son cannot take anymore, and maybe children are
teasing him or maybe he just cannot take any more in the classroom and he
gets worked up, he is the one who gets sent home and the rest stay in the
classroom. So he gets excluded.
have a constituent in my district, Mr. Speaker, whose son is autistic.
He is now at home, and has been at home for months.
Apparently, there are hundreds of children in this Province now who
are at home because the schools they are in do not have the resources to
enable those children to be in the classroom.
Instead of something being done to get services for them, they are
now being excluded because the schools do not have the resources to keep
them in the classroom. They are
being excluded now.
These children who are so-called included in the school system, in actual
fact, are worse off than they ever were.
Because before when they were not in the one classroom with all other
students all day long, they actually had people who were working with them.
Now, in order to be in the classroom and nobody is saying they
should not be there.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MS MICHAEL:
The parents are not
saying it either. What they are
saying is, where are the resources to help them be in the classroom?
one of the parents said to me today, there are times they have to leave the
classroom. It is not a matter
that it is even good for them to be in that one classroom all the time.
Where is the flexibility with regard to the needs of those children?
I have not one, I have several people in my district who have come to
me about this issue and it is getting more extreme.
This
is another miss. They like to
talk about the wins. I am
putting out there right now the misses, the things that are not working.
Let's look at something else. I
have in my district the new St. John's long-term care facility.
We all know about that facility, a beautiful building.
It is state of the art.
There is absolutely no doubt about that, Mr. Speaker, it is state of the
art.
What
is happening? We have a facility
there where thirty of the beds are still not open.
They have been in that building for months.
Thirty of the beds are still not open.
Those beds are not open because we had inadequate staffing.
Many
of the people from my district are in that building, and I have the families
of those people getting in touch with me.
They are upset about the fact that their loved ones are in that
facility and they are really happy to have their private room and happy to
share a washroom with only one person.
There are all kinds of things about it that are good.
It is wonderful having that building, but we have a government that
once again did not do any planning.
They did not plan for what the real needs were going to be in that
building.
have spoken already in this House, and I have asked questions in this House
with regard to the staffing levels of the long-term care facility.
We know and the government knows, and Eastern Health knows
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER (Littlejohn):
Order, please!
There are significant conversations on both sides of the House.
I ask hon. members if they could respect the speaker and either take
their conversations to corners of the House or outside.
Thank you very much.
The
hon. the Member for Signal Hill Quidi Vidi.
MS MICHAEL:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker.
appreciate your intervention there.
As I
was saying, we have a long-term care facility that does not have enough
staff in it to take care of the needs of the people, and Eastern Health is
recognizing that.
is really interesting, Mr. Speaker, they have been having over there
regularly, and this is a good thing, regular meetings called family council
meetings. They have the family
council meeting once a month.
One month it is in the east wing, and one month it is in the west wing.
They have to do that of course because there are so many people there
that even to try to have one meeting covering both wings at the same time
would make it difficult for people attending.
So they go back and forth.
One month after the other, they have these family council meetings.
the February meeting, Mr. Speaker and I understand this also happened at
the March meeting, but at the February meeting, I have the minutes here in
my hand the families raised concerns about what was happening at the
long-term care facility. They
raised concerns about understaffing.
They raised concerns with regard to high nursing absenteeism since
the move from Hoyles Escasoni over to the new facility.
They have raised concerns about continuity of care.
In other words, in one night or one day even they may see one nurse
on duty and the next day that nurse is not there, it is somebody different.
The same way with an LPN, the same way with personal care workers,
they do not have continuity.
Another issue that has been raised by them is lack of physiotherapy.
Another issue raised by the family is lack of recreational
programming. These are very
serious concerns, Mr. Speaker. I
have to say at least the minutes reflect that the staff gave the reasons for
their concerns. They said your
concerns are valid and the reasons they give are very disturbing.
They told them the truth.
They told them that, yes, we have a whole unit that is not open.
We recognize this is a problem.
We have concern for the families.
Our recruitment team is doing extensive recruitment and we are
starting to see successes, but it is a mess over there.
Here
you have the families at least were not nobody tried to deny it, they gave
them the reason, but it is a sign of the lack of planning, Mr. Speaker.
The same way with the continuity of not the continuity, that too,
but the one I wanted to look at, the families raised the issue of the lack
of physiotherapy. They were told
by the staff that there was a vacant physiotherapy position at the new site
since October of 2014. It had
been recruited for several times with no success and they were told that one
was coming. It is solved, one is
coming. Still months away, but
it was coming.
The
other thing that they raised, Mr. Speaker, was the lack of recreational
programming. Again, nobody
denied it. Everybody recognized
there is a lack of recreational programming.
They were told that the therapeutic recreation department has not had
a full complement of employees since moving to the new home and have been
down by three to four employees.
Mr. Speaker, this is not good enough.
have also had a letter from one of my constituents whose mother is in the
home. What she has described,
others have described to me as well.
She has put it in writing, a long letter, about a seven-page long
letter describing how her mother cannot get out of bed, she is alone in her
room, and this daughter does go in as often as she can every day.
The things that she discovers, sometimes 3:00 in the afternoon her
mother still has not been seen for her personal needs; a tray laid down for
her and nobody coming back to help her eat it; not having had her bath yet
at 3:00 in the afternoon not the fault of the workers, Mr. Speaker, and
this is what I want to make clear; it is because there are not enough staff
in the facility. That is the
reason for this reality.
This
woman, because of the lack of recreational facilities, she is not getting
the kind of recreational outside of her room that would stimulate her, so
she is very unhappy.
The
things that are going on and it is not the staff.
It is the understaffing that is the issue; understaffing not just
with regard to LPNs, understaffing not just with regard to nurses, but
understaffing also in the specialized areas the specialized areas, as I
just named, physiotherapy and recreational programming, just to name two.
The minutes of the meeting, the family says, that the manager of the
therapeutic recreation department is currently conducting a review of
service delivery to the facility.
Group exercise is a program on units presently, so they do get to
have fun and fitness. It is
called group exercise.
individual attention to the needs, no individual attention to somebody, for
example, who needs help getting out of bed.
You have people who are in bed and if they were able to be out
around, maybe in a wheelchair, they would be happy to do it, but not enough
of them are getting the opportunities to do that.
Mr.
Speaker, this is the legacy of this government so far.
Having been in power for twelve years, their legacy is a legacy of
half measures, not doing long-term planning, not recognizing that you have
to have a strategy has many phases to it and pieces fit together.
You just cannot put a piece in here, a piece over there, and a piece
somewhere else. You cannot say
we have a program to help families who want to take care of their own person
who needs long-term care and we will pay them, we will give them some money,
and, on the other hand, tell a person whose husband has home care and she is
in hospital you can go on home because your husband has home care.
She required home care herself.
They
are not putting all the pieces together.
They do not do planning.
They do not look at the long term.
They do not put in place all the pieces that are needed.
Inclusion we have heard about inclusion in school.
Oh, that sounds like a great idea, but who bothered to look at the
fact what did that mean. What did it mean in terms of resourcing?
What did it mean in terms of the needs, not just of the children who
had special needs, but what did it mean for the needs of the children who
are in the classroom, who want to be there with their fellow students who
have special needs, but also they too need to learn?
So what does it mean?
What does inclusion really mean?
What
we demand of this government is some real planning, Mr. Speaker.
Thank you.
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
remind the hon. member her time has expired.
MS MICHAEL:
Yes, my time is up.
Thank you so much, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Trinity Bay de Verde.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. CROCKER:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I am
pleased this afternoon to take my second opportunity to speak to
Budget 2015: Balancing Choices for a
Promising Future . Mr.
Speaker, I am first going to start by talking a little bit about my district
and move into my critic's role before I look at some of the information the
government has provided us when it comes to Budget 2015.
is always a pleasure to stand here and represent the people from Trinity
Bay de Verde. A district which I
have had the privilege to represent just since November, but it is indeed a
pleasure. Mr. Speaker, always,
in Trinity Bay de Verde, the first thing that comes to mind when you speak
is the fishery. It is by far the
most important industry in our district, with three plants.
One in Winterton, one in Old Perlican, and one in Bay de Verde doing
shellfish, and another plant in Old Perlican involved in the groundfish
industry. The groundfish
industry is one that we need to be prepared for.
As the groundfish stocks replenish, we have to ensure that we are
ready for that stock and ready to market that stock.
hear from the critic on our side for Fisheries all the time talking about
the failure of the government.
It has been a constant failure of this government to market and to plan.
We have not planned for the return of the cod fish.
We are going to pay for that when it does return in our waters.
The
other industry that is developing in Trinity Bay de Verde is tourism.
I can remember back maybe ten to fifteen years ago where it would be
very hard at that point to find accommodations in Trinity Bay de Verde.
Mr. Speaker, we have some world-class facilities, world-class
accommodations now in that district and some amazing infrastructure and
tourism attractions.
spoke to a petition earlier this afternoon that had to deal with one of
those locations, and I will just go back to it for a minute.
It is about the abandoned building in Northern Bay that burned down
about four years ago, and it is directly across from the entrance to
Northern Bay Sands. I am pretty
sure everybody in this House, if they have not visited Northern Bay Sands,
they are familiar with Northern Bay Sands.
I do call upon the government again and the Minister of Environment
to ensure that this cleanup takes place sooner rather than later.
also have Salmon Cove Sands in our district.
That is probably the two most prominent beaches.
We have Baccalieu Island, we have Bay de Verde heritage house, Old
Perlican heritage house. Mr.
Speaker, I am going to miss somebody if I start naming things.
also have Pitcher's Pond golf course in Whiteway, which is a lovely
nine-hole course. Anybody who
has played it will quickly understand that Pitcher's Pond is probably one of
the hardest nine-hole golf courses you will find anywhere.
I see the member
MR. K. PARSONS:
I played it twice
last weekend.
MR. CROCKER:
The Member for Cape St.
Francis played it twice last weekend.
So thank you for spending some of your money in Trinity Bay de
Verde, Sir. It is probably one
of the hardest nine-hole golf courses you will find anywhere.
There is no forgiveness, to anybody who understands golf.
Mr.
Speaker, that is a little bit about the tourism industry in Trinity Bay de
Verde, but there is one thing that comes out of Budget 2015 when it comes to
tourism and Trinity Bay de Verde that is a little concerning.
Mr. Speaker, 2016 will mark the 150 anniversary of the successful
landing of the transatlantic cable in Heart's Content.
In last year's Budget, the government did allocate some money for
some improvements to the museum.
Even today, those improvements to the museum are taking place and I thank
the government for that, and the people involved in the 150 celebrations in
Heart's Content would certainly thank the government as well.
The
troubling thing coming out of Budget 2015-2016, Mr. Speaker, is there is no
special line allocation for the celebration of the 150 anniversary of the
landing of the transatlantic cable.
Again, I met with this group on Friday in Heart's Content to talk
about the planning and where the planning had come thus far.
They are concerned not seeing a budget line item on funding for the
celebrations in 2016.
Mr.
Speaker, I urge the government and I urge the minister to ensure this
significant anniversary next spring or next summer actually I think July
27 is the day when a lot of the activities are going to take place, that the
government become an active partner in this and ensure the proper funding
for the celebration of the 150 anniversary of the successful landing of the
transatlantic cable takes place.
Mr.
Speaker, that is a little bit on the district.
I will come back to the district again when I get my next opportunity
to speak to Budget 2015. I am
just going to take a minute now and go into my critic role.
I am the critic responsible for business and rural development in the
Province. We have had some
exchanges here in the House with the minister over the past few months about
some of the activities around the Business Investment Corporation.
The
minister likes to point out the history of the loans.
He stood in the House, I guess two weeks ago, and said how 97 per
cent of the loans the department had written off were loans from previous
Liberal Administrations. The
minister did not really look at those numbers too closely because he would
have found that the number is not 97 per cent, it is substantially lower.
When
you talk about the loans of previous Administrations, you are talking about
the significance of the Fisheries Loan Board, Mr. Speaker.
The vast majority of the loans that have been written off over the
last ten years by this government were Fisheries Loan Board loans that date
back as far as 1968. We look at
comments made here of loans from past Administrations, but I was not even
born when some of these loans were lent.
Mr.
Speaker, when we look back at that, some of the information is not totally
clear to the people at home.
Some clearer information, we go back to the 2013-2014 annual report of the
Business Investment Corporation.
The financial statements for the Business Investment Corporation show loans
and equity in 2013-2014 of $36.3 million and a decline in value of $26
million. That is a decline of 73
per cent.
makes you wonder sometimes, Mr. Speaker, as somebody who comes from a small
business background what government is doing in some cases when it comes to
protecting taxpayers' money. On
March 31, 227 of the loans from the Business Investment Corporation of a
portfolio I think somewhere in the 550 loan portfolio were past due by
ninety days.
have to look no further than other jurisdictions in the country.
If we look at Nova Scotia and their Department of Business and Rural
Development as an example of how they handle taxpayers' money when lending
it for business development. In
Nova Scotia, it is an arm's-length organization very similar to what we have
here in the Province in our Research and Development Corporation that lends
money to businesses.
One
thing you will not find at an announcement or a ribbon cutting in Nova
Scotia when it comes to taxpayers' money, from the Department of Business,
is a Cabinet minister. In Nova
Scotia, the government removes themselves from business investment.
It is no different than we do somewhat with our Research and
Development Corporation, but in Nova Scotia, the government removes
themselves from the day to day lending.
think as we go forward, Mr. Speaker, it is something we should look at as a
Province when it comes to lending to small business.
I absolutely support government playing a role in business and
lending to businesses. There are
many, many success stories from this Administration, and from
Administrations past, of businesses that have been successful with the help
of government. I certainly
support government's role in helping with business development.
Mr.
Speaker, I am going to move away from there again a little bit now and talk
the eight pillars of this year's Budget.
First, I am going to look, Mr. Speaker, back three-and-a-half years ago at a
blueprint from this government in the 2011 election campaign.
I will just read some of the stuff I found in there that I thought
was interesting to point out to the people and just remind them of some of
the promises the government made just three-and-a-half-short years ago.
They
start off on page 3 talking about a reasonable approach to debt management.
Well, they have managed to get the debt from twelve years ago at $9
billion to what will be, if you look at the pillars of the new five-year
plan, to over $14.7 billion in five years' time.
So, they have managed one thing they have done on debt management
is they have managed to increase it.
Page
4, Population Growth Strategy. I
hear the Member for Cartwright L'Anse au Clair get up day after day and
talk about the Population Growth Strategy, or lack thereof.
That strategy has been a strategy that has seen our population
decline, Mr. Speaker, since we had this last blueprint.
They
brag about, on page 5, the Residential Energy Tax Rebate.
So three-and-a-half years ago they took some time to talk about it,
but, obviously, in Budget 2015 the residential tax rebate was eliminated.
Focusing on Teachers well, they focused on 77.5 teaching units this year
and here in the House last week were not able to give us a clear answer on
how many actual teachers will not have a job to return to in September, so
there is a focus on teachers.
Post-secondary, tuition freeze: Another commitment that the government has
always stood on its feet and talked wonderfully about tuition freezes year
after year after year, but this year the minister stood on his feet and said
well, hold on, we are hands off on the tuition freeze; that is a decision
for Memorial. In the 2011 Blue
Book it was something we could certainly talk about, but now it is a
decision for Memorial.
Student Housing: The 2011 Blueprint talks about student housing.
One of the increases in this Budget which concerns me as an MHA that
represents rural Newfoundland is increase to housing and the cost of student
housing, because it is the students from my district and from the vast
majority of the districts of members on this side of the House who avail of
student housing. So again, it is
the rural student who is going to pay for this increase in housing cost.
Then
there is another interesting section,
section nine in the Blue Book, it is
called Labrador. They talk about
the Trans-Labrador Highway, a highway that has pretty much gone nowhere
since the Humber Valley Paving debacle.
We got set back and as I think the Member for Cartwright L'Anse au
Clair today had a petition talking about the deplorable conditions of the
road and we hear it day in and day out.
As a link this past winter, the ferry was stuck for days and days on
end that the people of Labrador could not get across or we could not get
back over and the movement of goods is severely hindered.
is interesting while I am on Labrador for a second, I will just go off a
little bit from the blueprint.
Back in the early winter, I had the opportunity to spend the day at the
Northern Expo here in St. John's and there were interesting conversations
with small business owners from the coast of Labrador talking about the lack
of purchasing or local support that they were receiving from Muskrat Falls,
the development. We are not
buying local when it comes to Muskrat Falls, Mr. Speaker.
We have wholesalers here in the Province who were shipping, I think
up until that point in February it was nine pallets for this year in.
In one day alone, they counted fifty tractor trailer loads coming in
from the Quebec side.
The
government talks about a moose management strategy.
It is an interesting strategy.
In two petitions here in the House of Assembly this afternoon it
talked about a moose management or a lack thereof strategy.
The Member for Carbonear Harbour Grace referenced so the SOPAC AGM
he attended last week. Like he
said this afternoon, I think to quote his number it was $1.4 million they
spent on the monitoring system.
Everybody in this Legislature had some opportunity in the past five or six
years to drive in over the highway and look at the flashing light signs.
The ironic thing is on the bottom there was out of order.
They were out of order.
The out of order signs actually became permanent.
They were permanent.
There was a permanent out of order sign.
Usually out of order is just like a sticker.
These
AN HON. MEMBER:
(Inaudible).
MR. CROCKER:
Yes.
AN HON. MEMBER:
They are still
working out in Gander (inaudible).
MR. CROCKER:
On the West Coast they
are still yes. So it was a
permanent out of order sign. It
was quite interesting.
The
government talks about its ferry strategy.
We see where a ferry strategy for Labrador has gone, Mr. Speaker.
It has gone back to the drawing board.
This
is another interesting one. This
one, Mr. Speaker, really hits home for me in my district and I know other
rural districts. Digital and
Cellular Telephone Services: We will work with service providers to develop
a plan to expand digital and cellular telephone access to more regions of
the province. That was in 2011
that statement was made.
looked at an ATIPP request back again, I think in March, and it showed that
government has not been talking to anybody when it comes to cellphones.
They say it is a federal responsibility.
We agree. We recognize
the fact this is a federal responsibility, but it is a provincial
responsibility for government to advocate on behalf of the people.
We should be at the table telling the federal government that we need
a strategy and we need adequate cellphone coverage in our Province.
Mr.
Speaker, they also go back in 2011 and talk about the need for
re-establishing a fisheries loan board.
There has been no action.
That is gone, and I do not profess to know as much as the Member for
Carbonear Harbour Grace when it comes to the fisheries, but the FTNOP I
believe has been somewhat of a dismal failure to say the least.
spoke earlier on about tourism and the value of tourism in my district and
throughout the Province. One of
the things they talked about three-and-a-half years ago in tourism is
signage and a strategy for uniformity in signage.
I believe three years ago, they went out and removed a lot of signs
and there was a strategy. In
three years' time, we were going to have finger boards.
I think that has failed.
The
next one and I am getting towards the end of the blueprint.
AN HON. MEMBER:
Where is all of this
coming from?
MR. CROCKER:
This is the Tory
blueprint from 2011.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. CROCKER:
These are not my notes.
Page
56, Respecting Our Seniors this is a very interesting one.
I sat in this House three weeks ago, I think, when the Member for
Conception Bay South entered a private member's resolution on one Wednesday
calling for the establishment of a seniors' advocate.
AN HON. MEMBER:
(Inaudible) supported
that.
MR. CROCKER:
No, unfortunately they
never. One member from the
government actually got up and said seniors had enough.
MR. REID:
(Inaudible).
MR. CROCKER:
Exactly, I say to the
Member for St. George's.
Just
last week, after so much pressure coming from our side of the House and from
the Member for Burgeo La Poile talking about it, government has at least
now reinstated that a senior, not only a senior, but people in our Province
can actually not only get a half a set of dentures now.
So after pressure from the Member for Burgeo La Poile in Estimates
and in other places
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. CROCKER:
the respect for our
seniors came back a little bit.
So now seniors who require dentures can at least get a full set.
Mr.
Speaker, another thing they talk about is Care At Home.
I think that was the family caregiver program.
The family caregiver program has been non-existence from what I have
heard. I have not heard tell of
anybody getting up and championing the family caregiver program in any
recent time.
Policing and corrections, Her Majesty's Penitentiary well, we know what
happened to Her Majesty's Penitentiary and we know what happened to the
courthouse announcement. The
government went late last fall and announced a new courthouse for downtown.
No doubt we need one, but there was never anything done with it.
There was never a plan.
It was an announcement. It was
never a plan to replace the courthouse; it was an announcement.
How many announcements have we had to replace Her Majesty's
Penitentiary? It is just
announcement, after announcement, after announcement.
AN HON. MEMBER:
The Waterford.
MR. CROCKER:
The Waterford Hospital,
the same thing. The Corner Brook
hospital we all know $40 million for the Corner Brook hospital to date,
with $9 million this year for the Corner Brook hospital.
Well, I can assure you that will not go very far.
Mr.
Speaker, my time is running out and I wish I had some more if someone
could give me some leave because I only got through the Blue Book and I
wanted to go in and talk about some points of what the Liberal Party has
said we would do as a government, so I will save that for my next speech.
Thank you very much.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Labrador and Aboriginal Affairs.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. RUSSELL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
As I
do each and every time I stand on my feet in this House, I would like to say
again thank you very much to the people of the great District of Lake
Melville. From Sheshatshiu in
North West River up to Goose Bay into Mud Lake and into Churchill Falls, the
people have always been there to stand by me.
It is an honour and a privilege to represent them in this House and
in the daily activities of government, and it is an honour and a privilege
to get into the district each and every time that I possibly can.
Mr.
Speaker, I am going to start my commentary today again with just a little of
discussion about the district itself and some of the things that have been
happening. Last weekend not
this weekend past but the weekend before that I was in the great community
of Churchill Falls at Eric G. Lambert High School and we had the high school
graduation there. Nobody puts
off an intimate affair like the people in Churchill Falls.
I get to say that, Mr. Speaker.
It is a company town.
What they have is a very small number of grads and everybody takes part, but
they had a wonderful ceremony, a wonderful plan for the safe grad.
Everybody participated there.
just want to say for my fourth grad in a row at Churchill Falls, it was a
wonderful, wonderful experience put off with all the class and all the love
and support for those students that you would expect from the people of
Churchill Falls.
Mr.
Speaker, I just want to say one other note about that graduation ceremony in
Churchill Falls, Mark Critch the famous comedian, born Newfoundland and
Labrador responded to a student's request to be the guest speaker at the
Churchill Falls graduation. You
can imagine that now in very isolated central Labrador you have Mark Critch
coming in to address the dozen or so graduates.
It was wonderful, Mr. Speaker.
Even then in that speech by Mr. Mark Critch he talked about our
tourism ads, the Davis government, and a few of the things that we are
doing. I also got roasted a
little, which was my pleasure to be done by such a famous Newfoundlander and
Labradorian as well.
the kids of Churchill Falls, congratulations to them and all the best wishes
in the world. We hope the very
best for them in their continuing education.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. RUSSELL:
With that, Mr. Speaker, I
will move on to the grad that happened in Happy Valley-Goose Bay this past
weekend at Mealy Mountain Collegiate: eighty-five grads.
In stark contrast to the small intimate session that you have with
Churchill Falls, in Happy Valley- Goose Bay, eighty-five grads a very big
affair, if you will. It is very
hard to get that many kids organized and all that.
just have to say, just the way it was handled, the professionalism of all
the teachers, the wonderful things that the students had to say about the
teachers and vice-versa, the same as every other school in this wonderful
Province, Mr. Speaker. Even with
the teachers who jumped up for big flash mob in tribute to the kids, it was
a wonderful affair.
will say my own daughter, Alicia, graduated amongst that eighty-five.
I love her very much and wish her all the best but congratulations
to every grad as well. They had
a wonderful evening, a very well-planned-out safe grad with very, very high
attendance, I will say. I will
commend every committee, whether you are organizing the proms, the grads,
the safe grads, all that stuff, it takes a lot to get stuff like that done;
and time and time again we see people come out, give of their time, and
companies, of course, around the various communities always throw in there
to make sure things happen too.
That is certainly the situation with Nalcor in Churchill Falls, as well as
the business community around Happy Valley-Goose Bay.
So,
with that, I just want to touch briefly on another project that has been
happening in Lake Melville. We
have a woods project between the Minister of Natural Resources and Labrador
and Aboriginal Affairs. I will
say, Mr. Speaker, what we did was give a little tribute to the low income
and the seniors in the District of Lake Melville by coming together with the
two departments and putting a substantial amount of wood Muskrat Falls
wood, I will add, cut from the transmission lines to put that in the
communities of North West River and in Happy Valley-Goose Bay as well for
seniors and low income.
the community of Sheshatshiu we have put a substantial amount of saw logs
there to continue on with our sawyer training that we are having in that
community as well. So I just
want to say thank you to the minister for supporting our community.
Thank you to all the people in Nalcor who worked together to make
that happen so we can have a little bit easier access as a tribute to the
people who have paved the way for us our seniors, our elders in those
communities. We are very
appreciative of that.
will say in commentary to the program, too, the wood was put there for
everyone. I just want to
reiterate to the people out there who might catch wind about this or hear
they might hear about the project, they might be availing of the project,
taking a little bit of wood, but the bottom line here, the intent was for
low-income people and seniors.
So, we do not mind everybody going in there and grabbing a stick of wood or
two, if the need is there, but we would like to make sure that the community
puts it up to each and every one of us to make sure that we know who that
wood is there for, and if you do see people who are perhaps maybe taking
advantage of it, please just have a word with them, let them know what the
intent was just to reaffirm why that wood was put there, Mr. Speaker.
with that I am just going to talk a little bit more about some issues that I
see with the Nunatsiavut Government and our community freezers; up in
Labrador and we see this across a lot of places in the North as well, even
into Lake Melville, so I will go through Torngat Mountains into Lake
Melville. We have community
freezers, Mr. Speaker. It is
odd, if you look at this year's Budget and you talk about the additional
$320,000 that this year's Budget puts into monitoring the caribou herds up
in Labrador a couple of weeks ago actually I was in Yellowknife and I
talked with the Premier, Peter Taptuna, of Nunavut about the caribou
situation in Nunavut as well. It
is not isolated to Labrador. We
are feeling pressures across the entire North of all the herds.
We are doing a great job of monitoring the herd, Mr. Speaker, through
Environment and Conservation. We
are continuing to put that investment there.
This year's Budget is no different but the trends are the same, very
alarming, and whether we are talking about weather patterns, there are many
different theories out there.
The
elders are talking about predation, they are talking about insects, and they
are talking about permafrost.
There are many decent and different conversations happening depending on the
region you are from, but the result is the same, Mr. Speaker.
I applaud this government's initiative to continually look at those
natural resources such as the caribou herds in Labrador and to keep a focus
on, again, monitoring and the mediation of any type of work activity that
happens in Labrador so we can continue to have a focus on that herd.
With
that, Mr. Speaker, just talking about the Nunatsiavut Government and the
Inuit Community Corporations in my district, specifically right now I am
going to talk about NunaKtiget, run by Gary Mitchell Gary, a very famous
musician, is always out there playing for charitable events.
God love Gary. Gary runs
the NunaKtiget community freezers and we have partnered with them through
Advanced Education and Skills this year and the Labrador and Aboriginal
Affairs to make sure that they have extra access to not only a little bit of
farmland to do a little bit of farming for the seniors in our communities,
but also some dollars to purchase some country food, if you will, some fish,
some berries, some things for our elders, very special stuff, Mr. Speaker.
When
people get up in age, and whether they are at the long-term care facility or
they are taking home care workers into their own homes, a taste of the good
life, I will say, where they happen to have a set of experiences and
memories associated with fish that they got on the land or meat that came
from the land, partridges, wild berries, wild meat, fruit, vegetables, all
of that stuff, it is a very, very worthwhile initiative.
I just want to say to Gary in NunaKtiget you are going an excellent
job there taking care of our seniors in our communities.
Keep up the good work.
Time and time again, I will be there and this government will be there to
support your initiatives. I just
want to say well done to everybody involved, Mr. Speaker.
Moving on now, I see my time ticking away as it always does.
We are sitting here now in the House listening intently to each other
talking across the way. I could
not proceed any more without talking a little bit about some commentary from
the other side.
The
Member for Signal Hill Quidi Vidi got up.
I was just surprised because what we are getting is usually we get
the venom, Mr. Speaker, we get the negativity, the depression.
I keep using that word depression because it is as if everybody's
sole intent when speaking on that side of the House is to get up here and
make sure people have fear in their hearts.
They do not feel