British Columbia Hansard — Monday, March 9, 1970 — Afternoon Sitting (29th Parliament, 1st Session)

29p 01s 700309p

British Columbia — Debates (Hansard)

British Columbia Hansard — Monday, March 9, 1970 — Afternoon Sitting (29th Parliament, 1st Session)

29p 01s 700309p

British Columbia — Debates (Hansard)

1970 Legislative Session: ist Session, 29th Parliament

HANSARD

The following electronic version is for informational purposes only.

The printed version remains the official version.

Official Report of

DEBATES OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY

(Hansard)

MONDAY, MARCH 9, 1970

Afternoon Sitting

[ Page 585 ]

MONDAY, MARCH 9, 1970

The House met at 2 p.m.

On the motion of Mrs. E.E. Dailly, the following Bills were introduced, read a first time, and Ordered to be placed on the Orders of the Day for second reading at the next sitting after today:

Bill (No. 42) intituled

An Act to Amend the Female Minimum Wage Act.

Bill (No. 41) intituled

An Act to Amend the Male Minimum Wage Act.

Pursuant to Order, the House again resolved itself into the Committee of Supply.

(Estimates of the Department of Health Services and Hospital Insurance)

The Chairman reported progress, and asked leave for the Committee to sit again.

MR. SPEAKER: The Honourable Member for Cowichan-Malahat.

MR. R.M. STRACHAN: I am protesting what happened in Committee

when a member who was on his feet was interrupted by the Premier, and

the whole procedure that got you back in the Chair was completely

illegal and completely out of order.

MR. SPEAKER: Will the honourable member please be seated for

a moment. Let me say that the procedure was quite proper and was

interrupted not by any particular individual of the House but was

interrupted by the clock. Because the attention of the Chairman was

drawn to the clock, he properly rose, reported progress, and asked

leave to sit again. This is the procedure that was adopted. It is the

proper procedure and you'll find references for it, I am sure, in many

of the more important volumes that are used for the direction of this

House.

One moment please. The Honourable the Leader of the Opposition.

MR. D. BARRETT: On a point of order. Would the Speaker

clarify that when a member is on his feet that there can be no

interruption by way of introducing a motion to the House.

MR. SPEAKER: You are quite correct. He can only be interrupted by the clock.

MR. BARRETT: Thank you.

MR. SPEAKER: The Honourable the First Member for Vancouver–Point Grey.

MR. P.L. McGEER: On a point of order. Would you, just for the

benefit of our members here, indicate under which of the Standing

Orders the Chairman leaves the Chair and causes the Committee to rise

and report progress without ever a motion for the Committee to rise

having been taken. I don't see that in the Standing Orders here.

MR. SPEAKER: You won't find it in our Standing Orders, but

you'll find it amplified in certain of the other volumes such as May

and Beauchesne which I will be happy to give you later.

The House adjourned at 6.02 p.m.

The House met at 8 p.m.

MR. SPEAKER: Honourable Members, at the time of adjournment

of the afternoon sitting, a point of order was raised as to the

procedure adopted concluding the business of the Committee and the

subsequent adjournment of the House. I expressed the opinion at that

time that the procedure adopted was the correct one and in so ruling

referred honourable members to the fact that the procedure in question

is not set forth in our Standing Orders but in accordance with our

Standing Order No. 1, "The usages and customs of the House of Commons

of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland as in force at the time

the 17th edition of Sir Erskine May's Parliamentary Practice which

reads as follows: "the Chairman is either directed (the question to

that effect having been put and agreed to) to 'report progress and ask

leave to sit again,' or (if proceedings in the Committee are cut short

by the hour of interruption) he reports progress and asks leave to sit

again without such direction." I readily appreciate the interest and

concern of honourable members in questioning the procedure followed, as

theJournals of the House do not disclose any previous statement on the

matter. Accordingly I have now stated these reasons so that they might

appear in theJournals for future reference and guidance.

The Hon. F.X. Richter presented to Mr. Speaker a Message from His Honour the Lieutenant-Governor.

On the motion of the Hon. F.X. Richter, Bill (No. 40) intituled

Mineral Processing Act was introduced, read a first time, and Ordered

to be placed on theOrders of the Day for second reading at the next sitting after today.

On the motion of the Hon. R.G. Williston, Bill (No. 38) intituled

British Columbia Professional Foresters Act was introduced, read a

first time and Ordered to be placed on theOrders of the Day for second reading at the next sitting after today.

Pursuant to Order, the House again resolved itself into the Committee of Supply.

(Estimates of the Department of Health Services and Hospital Insurance)

The Committee rose, reported progress, and asked leave to sit again.

The House adjourned at 11.10 p.m.

Document details

CollectionBritish Columbia — Debates (Hansard)
Citation29p 01s 700309p
Typehansard
Volume / chapter29p 01s 700309p
Languageen
Formathtm
SourcePROVINCIAL
Identifier59d99188da94cb91c760a5c4db35f8a29c8fac1f

Source file is stored in the law ingest library (htm).