Newfoundland and Labrador Hansard — Orders of the Day — 2 June 2021 (50th General Assembly, 1st Session, Vol. L No. 9)
2021-06-02
Newfoundland and Labrador — Debates (Hansard)
PDF Version
June 2, 2021
HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY PROCEEDINGS
Vol. L No. 9
The House met at 10 a.m.
SPEAKER (Bennett):
Are
the House Leaders ready?
Order, please!
Admit strangers.
Orders of the Day
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Government House Leader.
CROCKER:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, I call from the Order Paper, Motion 7.
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Government House Leader.
CROCKER:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I move, seconded by the Minister of Municipal and
Provincial Affairs, that the Member for Lake Melville be appointed Deputy Chair
of Committees.
SPEAKER:
The
motion is that the Member for Lake Melville be nominated for the Deputy Chair of
Committees.
All those in favour, 'aye.'
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Aye.
SPEAKER:
All
those against, 'nay.'
Carried.
The hon. the Government House Leader.
CROCKER:
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
I call from the Order Paper, Motion 1.
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Member for Exploits.
FORSEY:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
It's always great to be in the House of Assembly. I
would like to say, to start with, to be elected the second time – I know the
first election was short; it was two years. To be re-elected for the second time
by the people of Exploits, it's really an honour. It's an honour to be here.
I would just like to congratulate everyone else for
being re-elected and elected to this House of Assembly. It's been a privilege
and an honour to be here, to sit in and talk about the things in our district,
talk about the cares we need, the things that people need and the addresses that
they need put forward. It's really a privilege to be here, Mr. Speaker.
During the election, again, this year, lots of times
you hear the same problems, the same issues. Health care, of course, is the
first and foremost in my district, in the Central region. It's been a big issue
and still remains a big, big issue. Of course, I can't miss the 24-hour
emergency service at the Dr. Hugh Twomey Health Care Centre. Mr. Speaker, I've
heard it all throughout the elections. This is three times now that the 24-hour
emergency service has been beat around in our district. It was promised in 2019.
It was committed to for 2021. During the election now in 2021, again, there was
even an announcement made that the 24 hours would be reinstated in June. The
people of Exploits are really looking forward to that announcement because it's
really an issue to them.
I didn't see anything in this budget for the 24-hour
emergency service to be reinstated. Why does government keep making promises and
making election issues, but then don't carry out with their promises? It makes
me only believe that they're just trying to get a seat in government, basically,
rather than trying to do something. It's horrible; it's terrible that people are
treated like that.
Mr. Speaker, they're really looking forward to the
24-hour emergency service being reinstated in Botwood. It takes a lot of
pressure, a lot of – the stories that I've heard with regard to that 24-hour
emergency service, people from the outlying area, Leading Tickles, Fortune
Harbour, have an hour's drive just to get to Botwood on a normal day. Put in bad
weather, stormy conditions and you can put that to two hours probably – from one
hour to two hours – to get to the emergency service. Somebody with bad health
conditions – a heart attack, whatever – every minute counts. To force people to
drive an extra, I've heard a half-hour, from Botwood to Grand Falls-Windsor
then, on a stormy night, bad conditions – no, forget it. You can't do it. If you
can, you're endangering lives even more.
Mr. Speaker, that 24-hour emergency service, it's time
for the government to commit, reinstate it and do as promised in the elections.
Not just using it as political issues, political ploys but come good on their
promises and let's get that reinstated. That is still a big issue in the
Exploits District and it certainly needs to be addressed.
Also in health care, Mr. Speaker, the home care. I've
heard from some of the seniors that the dental programs and the eyeglass
programs, they have to pay more. They need dental work; there's nothing there
for them to avail of. Some of the home care services – it's stressed that they'd
like to see seniors stay in their home longer.
During the election, I was talking to one lady who was
92 years old. She said that she still feels good but really can't afford to stay
in her home. Back in 2016 her subsidy was cut. She was staying in her home, I
think her subsidy was around $119, she was telling me, but she was receiving the
benefit. When the benefit was cut, then they increased her contribution. So it's
costing her almost double to stay in her own home than what it was before and
she just can't afford to do it.
She has heat – I visit her periodically just to see how
she's doing. You go in there in the wintertime and she has the heat down. You'd
almost freeze to death when you walk into her porch. It's terrible to see
seniors being treated like that, because she can't keep warm. I know friends and
family bring meals to her at times.
To treat a senior like that who is well up there in
age, more than capable of staying in her own home – more than capable – and to
have to pay the dental cost, the eyewear cost, and then increase subsidies for
home care, it just doesn't make sense. Those are the issues and problems that
I've been hearing in my district, Mr. Speaker, and I'm sure we have them all
across the province. If we're going to keep seniors in their own homes, we
better start looking out for the seniors so that they can stay in their own
homes and feel warm, comfortable and be attended to. That certainly needs
attention.
Mr. Speaker, tourism in our district; it's an amazing
district, we've got tourism galore just starting now. Of course, June 1, the
salmon is just starting to hit the river in Bishop's Falls, and I'm starting to
think I'd like to be there myself, but, anyway, that does bring a lot of people
to the Central area in the summertime, especially the two months, probably June
and July would be the prime months, of course, for the salmon fishery. If we put
more into tourism in our area we can certainly bring people to our area from all
around. If we can't have outside-the-province visits this year, or limited, we
can certainly drag people in from outlying areas in our own province and enjoy
the beautiful scenery of the Exploits District and the Central area itself.
Once you leave Bishop's Falls and you go out through
Exploits, you can go down through Botwood. Botwood has some of the best murals
in Atlantic Canada. I'm sure a lot of people have heard about them; I don't know
how many people have seen them, but I would certainly invite you to come out and
see them this summer. The beautiful murals that they have on all of the
buildings down there, depicting the heritage of Botwood and the history of
Botwood. Seeing how I was on the hospital, I'll certainly mention the one of Dr.
Hugh Twomey, a great doctor, a great physician himself, who helped build that
community and build the hospital in Botwood, Mr. Speaker. There are beautiful
murals there.
Then you keep on going down through the rest of the
district, you have Point Leamington, Fortune Harbour, Cottrell's Cove and
Leading Tickles, all beautiful scenic area, Mr. Speaker. Rugged coasts,
beautiful beaches and beautiful people; the people themselves are wonderful to
be around. They'd help you and assist you in any way they can. Mr. Speaker,
tourism is certainly an area that we can develop and make that area a lot more
feasible for tourism.
Roads: I'll just mention a few things on the roads.
Being from that area, with regard to getting to the – if the people have to
drive to Grand Falls-Windsor and the outlying areas on the roads, that can be
treacherous at times. If we're going to develop tourism, I'm sure the roads
would need a little bit more attention. There is some roadwork that needs to be
done, Mr. Speaker.
I'm hoping to meet with the minister and hoping to
address some of the attention on the roads. I'm sure roads in every district, in
every area, everybody is looking for roads because it is good for
transportation. If we're going to increase tourism, drag people around our own
province to get them in from other areas, roads is something that has to be
addressed so people can avail of it and be comfortable with regard to driving in
the areas, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, also in the district, I know employment
becomes a big issue. I'm sure it's seen all across the province, Mr. Speaker, of
employment. In Exploits, we have an abundance of forestry, we have an abundance
of mining and I must say, yes, there is a mine started in Valentine Lake right
now. Marathon Gold is up there, they're starting to mine and that's going to
bring upwards of 400 people in capacity when that mine is up and running in
2023. It is great. That is great news to hear and to see our province taking on
mining like that. But in other fashions, we've also got lots of minerals in the
Central region, in the Exploits region. I've talked to geologists out there and
they feel that the minerals there are still untapped with regard to the
industries that could be put there with mining.
Not only mining, forestry is another industry that is
really not tapped into. It is tapped into in Central Newfoundland, of course, in
the Exploits District, the big zones 10, 11 and 12 are the big forest baskets.
There are sawmills and industry right now on the Island, of course. The West
Coast and outside Central, they do take the pulp and the timber from Central
Newfoundland and just carry it away. People in that area are just watching the
trucks full of timber and loads of timber just leaving our area when we need
something with secondary processing in the Exploits District, Mr. Speaker. It's
there, our resource is right there on our own doorstep but we're watching it
being all trucked away and all pulled away. The people feel like this could
certainly be an industry that we could tap into, Mr. Speaker, to keep
employment, to keep people in our Central area and to keep everyone employed and
create jobs.
With that, Mr. Speaker, Botwood harbour is one of the
deepest harbours on the Northeast Coast. It has potential. If shipping becomes a
problem, I'm sure the Botwood harbour, once we tapped into the mining a lot
more, use the forestry a lot more with products and the minerals we have, if we
could get all that working in the Central area, we'd have a great place to live;
economically, we would have a great place to live. Botwood harbour, if it means
shipping lanes, I mean that was a shipping lane for years with the old Abitibi
in Botwood and the papermaking. They shipped it all out of Botwood at the time
and that, like I say, again, that port is one of the deepest ones; beautiful
harbours on the Northeast Coast.
I'm sure if we needed to ship forest products, if we
can find an industry, if we need to ship our products and our mining and our
industries, if we could get something there and use Botwood as a port, we'd have
a full operation down in Exploits District in the Central region which could
avail of lot more jobs, a lot more industry in the area. We need to put more
attention on that.
Mr. Speaker, agriculture, that's another big industry
in the Central Newfoundland region. I talked to some of the farmers and the
crops that they grow are – it's wonderful to see. Food efficiency is becoming a
thing now especially with COVID. We've learned that we need to be more
self-sufficient with regard to food. I know that the government has tried to
increase the crop availability here from 10 per cent of what we have right now
to about 15 to 20. To do that, Mr. Speaker, we need to help the farmers that are
already there.
I know there was a program in place, $2.7 million for
potato farming – youth, new farmers, that kind of stuff coming in, but that
doesn't help the Central region right now. That seems to be all going to the
West Coast and other areas of the province rather than directly into Exploits
and the direct Central area.
There are experienced farmers in that area, Mr.
Speaker; they've been at it for years. They know how to grow a crop. They know
what it takes. They started off with nothing, basically. They worked themselves
up and they have experience and they have great crops in there now. Some even
have apple orchards on their farms in there. It's great to see that. I'm sure
with some help and some funding they can diversify in a lot more crops and a lot
more food, Mr. Speaker, and expand our food self-sufficiency in years to come.
To do that, Mr. Speaker, they need some assistance in
order to expand and to grow. Even irrigation in some of the areas is a problem
to them. Even if we could help with that, the water supply, especially in a dry
year and dry summers. This could be another summer that might be dry because it
seems like this year the rain, the runoff seems to be happening a lot quicker.
The brooks seem to be a lot lower so this could be a year where we're putting in
money to help – if you're putting in money to help expand the crops, well,
irrigation has to be one thing, because if we lose a crop, then our food
self-sufficiency is certainly depleted.
We need to put more emphasis on the experienced
farmers. Not only the new farmers but we need to put more money into experienced
farmers, farmers that have the ability, have the know-how to expand, Mr.
Speaker, and make this province a great place to live and be self-sufficient in
our food.
Mr. Speaker, when I go back to health, diabetic pumps
are another thing I've heard that people are needing assistance with. There are
lots of things in health care that really need attention in the Exploits
District. I know that all across this province it's probably the same. People
are looking for the same things, no doubt. Whatever district we're in, wherever
we go, people are looking for it. We need to put more attention on the people
that we have here. We need to put more emphasis on health care, growing our own
province and making our communities a lot stronger.
Mr. Speaker, with that, I'll end off by saying, again,
that anybody wanting to reach out and explore the Exploits District this year,
I'm sure that you would love to come there and, especially, take up some of the
area in just, like I said, the salmon rivers. It's great to sit down on the
salmon river in Bishop's Falls there. They have new lookouts and you can watch
the salmon. I can't get off the salmon because it's on my mind. I see the Member
for Baie Verte - Green Bay; I guess he likes doing a bit of fishing himself.
Anyway, Mr. Speaker, it's always great to get up in
this House of Assembly and talk about the district because I believe in the
Exploits District; I believe in the people of the Exploits District. I believe
that we can make it work in the Central area; we can make it work in the
Exploits District alone for people. We have lots of development that can happen
there. We have people who want to make it work there, with some help from
government in those areas, to help the people along.
We have some great entrepreneurs in there that are
looking to expand and looking for businesses out there. They have some ideas. If
we keep tapping into our resources, tapping into our people, Mr. Speaker, we
will make Exploits District a great place to live and this province a great
place to be.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Member for Mount Pearl - Southlands.
LANE:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Certainly, it's a pleasure to have the opportunity to
speak to the budget this morning. Unfortunately – well, it depends on how you
look at it, I suppose, whose point of view. From my point of view,
unfortunately, 20 minutes is not a lot of time, considering there are so many
things in the budget and so many things we could speak to. I'm sure there will
be lots of opportunities throughout this process. I know there are some money
bills coming as well, so there will be lots of opportunity to speak about
specific aspects of the budget.
This morning I just want to sort of hit the top of the
trees on my view of the budget at first blush. I have reached out to my
constituents seeking feedback. I haven't received a lot of feedback yet, but
it's like anything else, I'm sure we've all been inundated with emails from –
NAPE employees are obviously saying reject the Greene report in totality,
basically, don't lay anybody off and so on. We've all received numerous emails,
I'm assuming, from the NLTA and concerns that teachers have. We've all received
them from the Employers' Council telling us to get on with it and start making
the cuts and adjustments that they feel need to be made to get us on a better
track financially.
Those are opposing views. Obviously, they all have
their own interests and so on. I'm not saying that they don't have the interest
of the province at heart as well, but they all come from their own perspectives
based on – I guess where you sit is kind of where you stand so they say. That's
the expression. We get that. But some of the feedback I've received from – and,
again, not a lot thus far – some constituents of mine is they felt that the
budget has not gone far enough in addressing our fiscal circumstance.
Now, I realize again that depends on the individual and
perhaps it depends on the region of the province that you represent. But looking
at the demographic that I represent, from a general point of view, I think
citizens are very concerned about the year-over-year deficits, the huge
provincial debt and the solvency of the province. I think it's fair to say many
of them I have spoken to don't believe the answer is simply to take the easy way
out, just tax people to death and try to solve our fiscal situation that way.
They believe that we need to look at the expense side–
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh,
oh!
SPEAKER:
Order, please!
The level of talking is a little too loud.
LANE:
of the financials and look at ways that we can be more efficient, more nimble
and save money.
That seems to be the general theme I've received thus
far. I realize not everybody shares that view. No matter what government does,
it doesn't matter; you're going to have people that are going to be for and
against every measure taken in a budget, generally speaking.
Let's face it, in an ideal world people want to see
better services and less taxes. That's not always possible. There's only a
finite amount of money to spend. As much as we'd like to see more money for this
and more money for that, particularly in our districts, the reality of it is
that we have a provincial debt that is crippling us. I'm not sure what the net
debt is now but it's over $15 billion for sure, maybe more than that: $16
million.
COADY:
Seventeen.
LANE:
Seventeen, there you go. Thank you, Finance Minister.
Seventeen billion dollars, with a B, just think about
that, for a population of 500,000 people and, of course, we're going to borrow
probably another billion again this year or more. That's going to bring us up to
$18 billion. That's just with the net debt. That's not with all the other
unfunded liabilities and everything else thrown in there.
It is a huge problem. It's a huge problem. The Auditor
General has pointed it out on numerous occasions. Our lenders have obviously
pointed it out. I think we all know deep inside, whether we want to admit it or
not, that action has to be taken. I think we've known it for a long time but the
will just has not been there. I understand the political pressure, I get it.
I'm sure that there are going to be some tough measures
that are being proposed that I'm going to support, depending on how they're
done, of course, and if they're done right. I'm sure I'm going to take some
backlash for supporting some of these things, but, at some point in time, we
have to realize the situation we're in financially and be willing to say that
some action has to be taken.
There were some positives that I saw in the Budget
Speech, some things that I was kind of happy to see. I was happy to see that
there's going to be a continuation and perhaps an enhancement of the specialty
courts, whether that be family violence intervention court and Drug Treatment
Court and so on. I'm certainly not a lawyer or nothing like that, but I have
sort of read up on, to some degree, the benefit of having these speciality
courts and trying to deal with people's issues as opposed to just strictly
taking punitive measures and incarceration, trying to actually deal with the
root of the problem and so on. Having specialty courts that are going to deal
with some of these social issues and addictions and everything else, I think
that's a positive move and I would certainly support it. I was glad to see that,
actually.
I was also glad to see that there continues to be a
commitment to our oil and gas industry in terms of there is some investment
there. I wish our federal government was as committed to our oil and gas
industry as we are in this House of Assembly. I am really concerned about that,
I really think that there is this sort of ideology in Ottawa that is not on our
side when it comes to our offshore oil and gas, and I think it is hurting us and
it could hurt us even more.
I think we all understand in this House the value of
our oil and gas industry and the tremendous benefits that it has brought to our
province, both from the perspective of royalties, but also employment and the
building of expertise and so on in our province. It has been tremendous for us.
Let's face it, it really has been a godsend for our province.
Unfortunately, we have been experiencing issues which
are – global issues, let's face it, it is not Newfoundland and Labrador issues
per se; these are global issues. I certainly hope we can get things on track,
but I was glad to see signs and signals in the budget that the government is
committed to our oil and gas. As others have said, and I would certainly agree
with the fact, the world is not going to be coming off fossil fuels tomorrow:
that's not reality.
I have had some people reach out to me, I'm sure others
have as well, who've said shut her all down, everything is going green, it is a
dying industry and so on. I understand the world is slowly moving towards a
green economy and many would argue that the faster the better, and I agree in
terms of global warming and so on, that needs to happen, but there is what we
would like to see and then there is the reality. I try as best as I can to deal
with reality, not wishful thinking. I think the reality of it is that it will be
around, oil and gas will be around and petroleum products will be around for
many years to come.
If it is going to be developed and it is going to be
needed throughout the world, somebody has got to benefit from it so why not
Newfoundland and Labrador. Especially given the fact that we have some of the
cleanest oil, so to speak, on the planet, so I understand, from a processing
perspective and so on. It makes sense to me that as we transition, that we
exploit as much of our product as we can to benefit our province so that we can
use those revenues to help get us out of debt and help us transition to the new
green economy.
That just seems to make good sense to me. Again, I'm no
expert in that either but it makes good sense and I was glad to see a commitment
from our government that we're not giving up on our oil and gas industry. I
would be very, very – disappointed would be an understatement if we were.
I was also pleased to see that government has committed
that they're going to be developing, I guess, a new renewed Poverty Reduction
Strategy or plan or whatever you want to call it. That's good news because there
was great progress made by the former administration. I think it was started
under Premier Williams, if I'm not mistaken, the Poverty Reduction Strategy.
They made good progress over the years, but it seems to me that it kind of
stalled. At some point in time, it kind of stalled and we haven't seen that type
of commitment for a few years. We've maintained what we've had but I don't think
we made a lot of strides beyond where we've been, certainly not enough.
I'm glad to see that government is saying they're going
to sort of renew and kick-start that process and, hopefully, in doing so we can
find ways to help lift people out of poverty and make them healthier and
contributors to our province.
The fitness tax credit: Obviously, that's a positive in
terms of trying to move from – in our health care system prevention, I guess. I
guess the only criticism of the fitness tax credit – obviously, a lot of people
in my district think that's a wonderful thing because a lot of those people are
of the income base and so on that they have the money, not all, but I'd say most
people have the money to be able to go to a gym and whatever. They're doing it
now anyway, so if they can get a tax rebate for going to the gym or for having
their kids in sports, well, then, obviously, they're going to say that's a good
thing so I'm not going to be against that.
But I would point out, I think as others have pointed
out in reaction to the budget, I'm not sure that does a lot for low-income
families and people who can't afford to – they can't afford the gym membership
and then wait for a tax credit at the end of the year. They don't have the money
upfront to even afford to go to a gym or some of them can't afford to put their
kids in sports. I know there are programs like Jumpstart and so on, which are
great programs. I know certainly in Mount Pearl all of the sporting groups, they
will never let a child who wants to participate not participate because of
money. Whether Jumpstart is available or not, they always find other ways
internally to make sure every child who wants to play can play. I certainly
commend them for that.
Again, if we want to be committed to this and going
down this road, this is a positive, but we need to find ways to make sure that
people of low income can participate in this as well, and that they have ways
for their children to avail of sports and fitness. By the way, the same thing
goes on the sugar tax issue. That's received somewhat of a mixed review in the
public. Some people are applauding it and other people are saying that you're
attacking the most vulnerable who can't afford healthy food.
Personally, I don't think it's a bad idea in concept,
but I would like to see – and I don't know how we do this by the way, so I'm
just throwing it out there as a thought more than a plan, because I don't have
one, I'll admit that. It would seem to me that if we're going to be collecting
extra money from a sugar tax, somehow that money should be diverted into some
kind of a program to help low-income families to be able to afford milk to
replace pop, healthy foods and healthy drinks. You're not really solving the
problem unless people can afford the healthy stuff. We need to be doing more to
get healthy food for people who can't afford healthy food.
It's fine for all of us here and many people who can go
up to the grocery store. We might complain. I know I go up to the grocery store
lots of times and say: Oh my God, look at the price for a few grapes or
whatever, it's ridiculous, but at the end of the day, I still buy them. I might
complain about it but I still buy them, I can afford to buy them. What about the
people who can't? Somehow, we have to do something for those people.
I was very pleased that government had announced that
they're going to be adding oversight here in this House of Assembly to agencies,
boards and commissions. That was probably my favourite highlight of the budget,
to be honest with you, on a personal level, because it's something that
certainly I've been advocating for in the last number of years and I really
believe it's the right thing to do.
As I've said in this House of Assembly in other Budget
Speeches and other times, here we are counting pencils in the minister's office
and then just approving one line on the budget that transfers millions or
billions of dollars to a particular entity. I think with the Minister of Health,
as an example, it is $3 billion – one line, a $3-billion grant to the health
care authorities. We're not even talking about $3 billion but we're asking the
minister how much he spent on photocopying in his office, which is kind of
ridiculous when you think about it. I definitely applaud that move. I'm glad you
did it. I'm glad you listened.
The electric vehicle grant, I think that's a good idea.
The feds are doing it and other provinces are supplementing the federal grant
with a provincial grant. I'm not sure if our grant is as high as some of the
other provinces, but it's a start. It helps move us down that road of a green
economy. I thought that was a positive, as well as having the infrastructure in
place across the province for you to be able to charge your vehicles. I think
these are moves in the right direction. Also, the grant to convert oil to
electric heat – that was another one.
We've maintained, of course, the $25-a-day child care.
The $25-a-day child care – and I know the feds are saying they want to get it
down to $10 and a lot of people will applaud that. There's no doubt that child
care is a barrier to getting people in the workforce. No doubt about it. I think
these things will pay for itself over time, I really do.
On the $25-a-day child care – and I don't know if other
Members have gotten calls from daycare operators or whatever in their district,
child care operators, but one of the issues that I'm hearing is that there are a
number of child care operators that are not offering $25-a-day child care;
they're not doing it. They can't do it because they were charging $45 a day.
That was their business model that they were utilizing.
The government is saying we want to reduce to $25 a
day, but we're only going to give you a subsidy of, I think it is, $13. If you
do the math, if they charge $25 and the government gives them $13 – $25 and $13
is $38, not $45. They have to take a $7 cut in their revenue per child, a $7 cut
in order to offer this program.
Many of them are saying I can't afford it. Maybe if
you're a large operator and you're doing it on volume you can suck it up somehow
and make it happen, but a lot of the operators can't. They've had to say: No,
b'y, I'm sorry. There are a lot of people that are not getting the advantage of
the $25-a-day child care because their child care operator is saying: I'm sorry;
I'm not enrolling in this. I can't. If you want to try to find somewhere at $25
a day, be my guest. Of course, they can't, because there's nowhere else to go
because they're full. So people are still having to pay the $45. That is a
problem that needs to be addressed.
As I said, Mr. Speaker, when I started, all I've done
is I've sort of ticked off a few positives. I haven't even started on any of the
cuts or proposed cuts and I'm out of time already. I'm glad I'm going to have
lots of opportunities to get on that track as we move forward.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Member for Labrador West.
BROWN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Once again, it's a privilege to speak in this House on
behalf of the wonderful people of Labrador West. Maybe I'll take a page from the
book of my colleague there – from his response to the budget – from Stephenville
- Port au Port; I'll name all the communities in my district: Labrador City,
Wabush. There we go.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
BROWN:
know. I only have two communities, but I have more iron mines than I do have
communities, so that's a bonus there. There are four operating iron mines in my
district alone, maybe soon to be five, maybe soon to be six.
We are blessed that we have such abundant resources. I
think one geologist told me: Don't worry about buying anything or building a
home or a cabin in Lab West; you'll be good for 200 years. I'm glad to hear that
there's at least 200 years of iron in the ground around my community alone.
That brings with it a lot of opportunity. If we look at
the budget lines and stuff like that, it referenced iron ore a lot in the
budget, which I'm really pleased to hear. In it, it referenced man-years or
people-years of work, and it's in the thousands. So thousands of person-years of
work, that's a good shining light. It's a strong, steady industry that's been
around forever and a day. The first prospectors to go into the area were in the
1900s, so we always knew it was there. We always knew we had this asset in the
ground. The question always was how do we get it out in an economical way?
Thanks to the post-war boom of World War II, they found
a way to get it out. Building the railway alone was considered the greatest
railway-engineering project in the modern world, just to build a railway into
Labrador to get up onto the height of land. Ingenuity – if it's there, it's
there, and if they want it they'll come and get it. We have an abundant
resource, we have a great opportunity there and let's continue to grow that
opportunity in a reasonable manner.
We're now entering the world of the green, low-carbon
economy and even the mining companies are looking at themselves internally and
saying: How do we continue to do business and how do we do it in a green,
economical way?
Here's the great thing that I've noticed after speaking
to some people in industry, is that it's actually creating more jobs in the
mining industry by switching to low-carbon initiatives and stuff like that.
They're actually creating more jobs within their own organizations, which has
been a fascinating thing in a sense that the investment into green mining that
we all know no matter what we build or what we need, we're always going to need
iron; we're always going to need nickel, copper and the list goes on.
But how do we get it out of the ground and do it in a
way that we're not hurting the environment beyond what we've already hurt it?
This is where we need to take a strong initiative and investment to look at the
technology, the research and development.
I know last evening we were here for Estimates with the
Minister of Industry, Energy and Technology and we had a great conversation
about all of those kind of things with the staff of the department. We have to
work towards this, we have to invest in research and development, and we have to
get Memorial University on board to do that in their facility because there are
opportunities there. We have to get to them before somebody else gets to them,
because if we lose our foothold in that market, if we lose our foothold in the
change into the green economy, then we're behind the eight ball and then it's
just no good.
We have to take our time – well, not even actually take
our time, we don't have time. We need to take an initiative into investing in
these opportunities while we have the chance, while we're ahead of the game. We
have some of the biggest players in the mining industry in our province already
that are looking at these things.
I know in Labrador West, one of the mines there is
looking at the idea that: I'm burning too much bunker C, I need to stop burning
bunker C, because if I keep burning bunker C I can't trade with the European
Union because they're putting in such strict rules about even what goods they
import. They already have it on gold and silver and all of that stuff in the EU
that if these minerals are coming from an area that's not environmentally
friendly, trade friendly, treat their employees well, they won't import it into
the European Union.
Now, this is coming down onto base metals like iron,
copper, nickel and all this stuff. They're saying that they don't want to lose
their foothold in the European market, so, obviously, they have to take a shift.
These new regulations, these things are putting pressure on these companies to
actually change, and some of them are taking the initiative to do it just before
the rules come into place.
We have mining opportunities there that are saying, do
you know what? I have to stop burning bunker C. I have to convert from using
that. Well lucky for us in this province, we have hydroelectricity, which the
European Union sees as an opportunity, they say it's okay if you're using
hydroelectricity, you tick the box for environmental in the sense that you're
not burning fossil fuels and you're not releasing carbon.
Now, they're looking at technology of how can they
convert certain mechanics of their operation into green technology. This is
where we have the opportunity to invest in the mining industry and changing the
mining industry in a way that we can be the leader in the world for green
mining.
I know if you look at the term green mining, well,
you're still digging a hole in the ground, you're still doing that, but you at
least have to start with your carbon emissions and then work back on other
opportunities you can to make sure that we leave as little destruction and
little footprint in the environment we have, especially in Labrador. Labrador
has always been deemed the last natural frontier in this country. It's the last
place that you can go and still see things as they were thousands of years ago.
This is another thing, too, we have these
opportunities, we have these active operations, do it with the least amount of
impact to the environment, but, at the same time, do it in a way that when we
clean up the site and everything like that it's like it was never ever there.
That's where we have to take these things. We also look
at orphaned mines and orphaned sites and other industrial sites throughout our
province, too. We have to take the opportunity to clean it up, put it back to
the way it was so that we can also remember that, yeah, we did that, but, at the
same time, we put it back when we were done because we don't want to leave it
for another generation. I'm sure the generation behind us is already a little
pissed off with us as it is, what we've leaving them with.
We have to keep that in mind that we have a
responsibility to the environment, we have a responsibility to the economy and
we have a responsibility to the people of this province. We have to weigh those
three things very heavily on the sense that what we do over here will have an
effect with the other two and vice versa.
I always have the interesting thing that in my
community we have a cyclical market that is the iron ore market. Today is a
great day, ore is trading at – I think this morning it was 190-something tons on
the 62 per cent market, which you add premiums in, that's over
$200-and-something dollars a ton for ore that comes out of Labrador because it's
a better quality ore.
That's great, that's record highs, but, at the same
time, it creates problems; low-income people in my district usually get bumped
out of housing, contract companies and stuff coming in to do work for the mine
bumps things around. We always have people who don't work in the mining
industry, who work in the service industry, who don't make quite enough to pay
for the $2,000 to $3,000 a month apartment. We always say it's great, the mine
is doing great, but the balance is thrown off.
We always have to take that into consideration, what
you do over here is going to affect over here. So we always have to take the
effect that homelessness and stuff in my district is a little different than it
would be here, probably in the metro area. It does get to 40 below in Lab West
and it does have its challenges. Then once the mining market goes the other way
around, you'll see that homelessness and stuff kind of disappears for a little
while because those people who are charging $2,000 or $3,000 a month for an
apartment needs to get people back in their building so they drop it down to a
reasonable rate, the people move back into these apartments again and then the
cycle starts all over again.
When we do get these markets and we look at development
and all these things and all the opportunities that we do create, we also have
to put in safety nets or measures in place that keep protecting the people on
the other end of the spectrum. We need to make sure that when we're doing great,
that the negatives that come with doing great don't outweigh or affect the
people that are on the other side. We have to find that perfect – well, not
perfect balance, but we need to find a balance that everyone in our society is
protected from certain elements of other things.
We look at the housing, we look at that, we make extra
sure we have enough housing in place for when it happens, but we also have to
look at the ideas that when we are in a downturn, it is a great opportunity for
maintenance review and look at what you have to make sure that it's ready just
in case it happens again.
I always find it interesting in my district, we have a
very large population – we are one of the largest regions, communities that
don't have an emergency shelter – no barrier shelter. We don't need it all the
time but in times like this is when we need it. We find ourselves sometimes, a
single individual venturing up to Lab West to, hopefully, find that job and hit
it big, but sometimes they fall on hard times or there are other issues in the
way and they find themselves homeless, no job, trapped in a community that is
not familiar to them. It happens pretty frequently. Or they haven't hit it big
with that job yet and they get kicked out of an apartment and end up having to
leave the job because they don't have a place or don't have a vehicle.
We get these situations that we are not prepared for.
We don't have the mechanisms in place to deal with these situations like other
communities in this province that do have it. We find ourselves in these
situations that we need that little investment, we need that safety net built in
place to protect these individuals.
There are situations – sometimes it's not even a fault
of their own; it's a fault of the situation of how the markets and that work in
Labrador West. Some people are just not prepared for that. Everyone always jokes
and calls us sometimes little Fort McMurray, because we have similar social
situations that they have, but on a really scaled-down version.
We have the opportunities and stuff there. Like I said,
another big one that comes up when we're in a good high market is addictions and
mental health issues. I always tell people big money comes with big problems. In
some cases it's addictions. We've always struggled in Labrador West with
addictions.
One shocking revelation came to me one day that some of
the people in the community were finding needles and stuff around the community.
I was informed that, yeah, injected narcotics have made its way to Labrador
West. That's a scary, scary thought to think that we're going down that road. We
need to make sure that we have the net for proper drug and alcohol addiction
treatment in our region.
Gambling addiction is another huge issue that we battle
with. Like I said, big money becomes big problems. It's not unheard of,
unfortunately, to hear stories of complete paycheques put in one of those
machines. We're blessed with one thing, but it comes with its own challenges, it
comes with its own demons, per se.
It's very hard to think that we're doing so well, but
at the same time, there's a group of people that's not doing so well. We need to
make sure that we have as much social safety nets in place that we can to make
sure to minimize the impact of these things. Then, when the market does – and it
will – come down, we go into another thing where a lot more people will be
negatively impacted and we'll stretch the services and stuff very thin.
I'll take a moment, too, to talk about the seniors in
my district. We've never been a community known to have a large seniors
population, but now we do. Like I said previously to that, we're a newly aging
town. We've only been there since 1959, but now we're going on third- and
fourth-generation Labrador West residents. The second and third generations are
sticking around to watch their grandkids grow up in the community that they
helped build, but the thing is the services and the care for these seniors is
just not there. A lot of them are stuck in very large houses with large
maintenance bills. Trying to downsize into something reasonable is not there.
Some people, they're widows with a bit of advanced care. There's no seniors'
home or anything that could take care of them, there's only Level 4 long-term
care.
I take the example of my Aunt Blanche. She's 94 years
old. She's currently the oldest living resident in Labrador West; first to get
her vaccine in Lab West, too. She only just recently had to go into long-term
care. She spent many years alone in a large house that was very hard for her to
maintain, until she got to the point where she had to go into Level 4 at the
long-term care facility because she had a loss of mobility. She came to the
community when she was young and she was one of the many people who helped build
it to what we have today. She stuck around because she wanted to watch all her
grandchildren, and nieces and nephews and everything, grow up in the community
that she helped build.
We have many residents with similar stories. They don't
want to leave because they helped build it. Why would they want to go somewhere
else? They want to see the fruits of their labour and watch their grandkids and
great-grandkids grow up in the community that they helped build. We're really
struggling with that. We really have a need to look after our seniors, but it's
just not there. An investment in seniors is a good investment, because they
helped build this whole province to the beautiful province we have. We need to
make sure that we look after them and put them in a place that they are
comfortable and treated with respect and dignity.
Right now, my residents, unfortunately, don't have that
opportunity to stick around. They're being told they have to go to communities
that they don't even know. They may have passed through on the TCH, but they've
never been there; they don't know anybody there and now they're asked to live
there. It is pretty heartbreaking to have to tell residents that if they want
that kind of care, they have to leave Labrador West. Like I said, we are the
most western point in this province. We are the most far-flung and now you're
telling people to leave to go 2,000 kilometres away just to have the care they
need. It's pretty hard to tell them that. We have the opportunities and we
should put the investment into looking after these people who helped build our
community.
Another great opportunity in Labrador now is tourism. I
spent a bit of time on the Gateway Labrador board. We talked about tourism and
how we can turn Labrador West into a little bit of a tourism hub. It's not our
main industry. A lot of the oxygen in the room gets sucked up by the mining
industries, but there's a great opportunity there. A lot of people want to come
and see. They want to see a haul truck or a giant mining shovel. Actually, in
this province the rarity of seeing a train does draw people to Labrador West. So
we do have some of that opportunity, but we also have natural beauty, which is
another thing.
When I was with Gateway Labrador, we talked about all
the different aspects of how to bring tourism and stuff like that. One season,
we decided to do a survey on what kind of people were actually coming to
Labrador West. We had a volunteer survey and the first category was Québécois.
One of the larger groups that did come through was people from Quebec. The
second was German or German speakers, so people from Germany, Austria and
Switzerland. They were our second-largest group of tourists to pass through
Labrador West.
It was pretty interesting to see this German group come
through. They were coming through as adventure tourists. Most of them had
specially designed retired military vehicles, modified to take them on these
very long journeys. Some of them were coming right on up from South America,
right on through and that, but they heard about Labrador, they heard about its
thing.
A lot of them were disappointed to find the road was
paved. They were always told about this great big, long gravel highway. I told
them we're grateful that it's paved, but to them, they wanted the adventure of a
gravel road, but so be it. They were always told about Labrador. I'm guessing
some of them must have been reading The
Lure Of The Labrador Wild or heard
about Leo Hubbard or the great adventurers that passed through Labrador. That's
what they wanted; they wanted that adventure of travelling into this great,
unknown territory.
It was very interesting to see that we have this market
for tourism over in Europe like we do, but it was all word of mouth. They were
all finding out about this through these stories and these things: this was just
word of mouth and it was a significant group of them. So capturing the idea of
Labrador's raw beauty as a tourism thing is possible. We should take some strong
investment into just enticing people to take in Labrador as it is and as it
currently stands as this last bastion of natural beauty and opportunity for
people in this province. It is great to see that we have that and we need to
capitalize it, not create tourism, but just use what we already have to our
advantage.
Another thing I do want to say is – and my colleague
from Mount Pearl - Southlands touched on it too – is the thing about sports and
encouraging healthy activity. I always say it starts at school. Healthy eating
habits and physical activity starts in school, because that's where people pick
up on their habits and people pick up on the different things that they do in
their adult life. Investment in school sports and the ability to have –
post-COVID – school sports and stuff, to compete with each other and to create
that camaraderie is really important.
The hardest thing for Labrador residents is to leave
Labrador to compete on the Island for sports and in the arts. There used to be
programs at one time that did help with this. I really think we need to go back
and look at that again, to give the opportunity for school sport and for school
art, to be able to travel to the Island portion of the province and compete or
show off their works as one province. Right now, the majority of it is
Labradorians are trapped in Labrador and people on the Island are trapped on the
Island.
We should have the ability to enable school sport and
art communities to travel interprovincially and meet each other and compete or
perform, because I think that comradery was a very key thing in this province,
and the idea of team sport and stuff like that, or even individual sport, but
competing –
SPEAKER (Warr):
Order, please!
I remind the hon. Member that his speaking time is
expired.
BROWN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Member for Grand Falls-Windsor - Buchans.
TIBBS:
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
I'll concur with my colleague from Labrador West, it is
an absolutely beautiful area. I worked as a paramedic there at the Captain
William Jackman Memorial Hospital and it was fantastic. People that are great,
and there are lots there, so.
First of all, I want to thank the people of Grand
Falls-Windsor - Buchans for re-electing me again. In 2019, they saw an
oil-covered driller from out west that came home and wanted to do the best for
his province, and they gave me that opportunity. I wanted to work hard and make
them proud and give me the second opportunity; that's what they did. I thank
them for that.
I also want to recognize everybody else here that were
successful. I want to acknowledge everybody's families – wives, husbands and
children. It's not easy to go through an election and it's much harder on them,
I find sometimes, than ourselves. So kudos to all them as well.
Why are we elected? I'm elected for Grand Falls-Windsor
- Buchans because we can't fit 18,000 people in this House of Assembly from that
area. I am here to speak for them, and that's exactly what I intend to do. When
I speak for them, I do the best I can for their interests. That's what we're all
here for. The government listens, we bring their voices forward, their concerns,
their issues, and we expect action or we expect at least an acknowledgement.
I know some time ago I presented a petition here in the
House of Assembly about bullying in schools. That can touch on mental health, it
can touch on education and whatnot. I also know that ministers are busy. This is
not to call anybody out or embarrass anybody. But when I presented that petition
a lot of parents, a lot of students, a lot of people put a lot of work into that
for me to present into this House of Assembly, to get a reaction, to get some
sort of answer. Again, it's not to embarrass anybody or call anybody out, but I
was hoping to get an answer or at least a response, at the time, from the
minister.
Now, I know the minister's very, very busy. I know he
works very, very hard. I know he's put pretty much a lifetime into our province.
I can't thank him enough for that. But it's very disappointing when we bring the
voices forward, the people we represent, to the ministers, to the government,
and we don't get a response. If there's a phone call made, there's no phone call
back. That's very deliberate sometimes to ourselves. We don't like it, our
constituents don't like it. It's not the way it should be.
I'll just remind everybody in this House of Assembly,
the ministers included, you're the minister for your department for the people
of Newfoundland and Labrador and I just want to get that straight. I might be
sitting as a minister one day and I hope somebody reminds me of that as well
because sometimes it may be needed to remind somebody of that. I appreciate the
work you do, but remember what your role is. It's a separate role from your
constituency, in my opinion. I just wanted to get that straight.
You know I don't care if you're a doctor, a lawyer, an
oil rig worker, teacher or hockey player from Bell Island, it doesn't mater,
check the ego at the door. When you come in here everybody is the same;
everybody should remain the same. Everybody should have the same goals in mind.
I'm learning as I go here, it's been two years, I
learned a lot in the past two years and I have so much more to learn, I look
forward to it. That's that, I look forward to working with the government as we
move forward for the best interests of the people from Grand Falls-Windsor -
Buchans, and all throughout the province.
The next thing I want to do, Mr. Speaker, is
acknowledge something very important throughout the world and especially here in
Newfoundland and Labrador and that's Pride Month. We just entered Pride Month
here on June 1. I want to recognize all those men and women, children, boys and
girls who find the courage to just be themselves. It's very difficult sometimes,
especially in this day and age. I want to recognize everybody who does that.
I'll give you a case in point and how hard it can be
sometimes. In 2014, I picked up my youngest son Declan, he was about nine years
old at the time, I picked him up from sliding, and we were driving home. He
looked at me and he said: Dad, I think I want to paint my room – true story. I
said: That's great son. What colour would you like to paint it? He said: Purple.
I said: Absolutely. Let's get on it when we get home and get some purple paint
and paint your room. With that he sort of looked down and he looked up at me
again and he said: Well, Dad, you probably don't want a son with a purple room,
do you? It absolutely broke my heart. We sort of knew back then which direction
he was headed.
Fast forward to the summer of 2020, this past summer
and when he came out to myself and his mom. That kid is my hero because he was
always himself. He grew up – and I tell you what, he had some tough days growing
up, like so many other people here in Newfoundland and Labrador. That kid
remained himself and stayed true to himself, when so many people are fake in
this world. Boy, he was my hero growing up. I love him to death.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
TIBBS:
There are so many like him and what they suffer through their whole lives, not
just until they get to adulthood but their whole lives, what they suffer
through, holding in what they would think to be an embarrassment or what they
would be outcast for. Boys and girls, it's a different age and time, and thank
God it is.
For any young men and women throughout my district,
Grand Falls-Windsor - Buchans, there's a very modest bungalow at the corner of
Knight Street and Newhook Street. If you ever need to get away or if you ever
need to seek a place of acceptance, understanding or safety, you go to that
house. I guarantee you, I'll be there waiting for you and we'll take care of it
from there. I promise you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
TIBBS:
I'll just spend another moment on this and then we will get into some more
details.
I would be remiss if I didn't recognize our men and
women throughout the military who gave these people the right to be who they
are, past and present. Thank you so very much to all soldiers past, all the
soldiers present for working so hard, fighting, giving up your lives so my son
can be the man that he is today.
Many districts throughout Newfoundland and Labrador
face different challenges, but many districts also face the same challenges: the
pandemic. I'm not talking about COVID-19 pandemic; I'm talking about the mental
health pandemic that we face every single day. Some people face it more than
others.
The societal pressures that are put on parents today
are absolutely overwhelming. It's absolutely crazy to think about it. Most of us
in here are parents, and there are so many parents out there, but the pressures
that are on parents today can break a man or a women, absolutely.
I look back 40 years ago or 20 years ago, 30 years ago,
when I growing up, for instance, when I was 12 or 13, a $2 plastic hockey blade
at the bottom of the stick, b'y, that's all I needed at the end of the day. Now,
a parent is pressured to buy a $1,600 iPhone for their kid, because they need
it. To face those pressure and challenges, oh boy, it's tough sometimes. It's
tough on everybody, I can guarantee you. It doesn't matter which part of society
you're in; it's a very, very tough thing to deal with.
The price of goods, services, food – my colleague from
Mount Pearl - Southlands alluded to it earlier – they're not in line with the
money we're making now. Not us, but people in general out in the province. It's
a struggle for a lot of people. If you want to see something absolutely
heartbreaking, when you go to Dominion and Sobeys – I'm a bit weird, yes; I am.
I'll go to Sobeys and Dominion intentionally. I'll spend hours there. I will.
Just talking to people, of course, and observing people. There's nothing more
heartbreaking than watching a senior citizen pick up something, put it in their
cart, think about it, look at it and put it back on the shelf; a senior, a
person on low income.
When you're standing in an aisle and you're trying to
decide whether you can buy something or not – food, not just buy something or
not, but buy food – that's absolutely heartbreaking when we've hit that point.
There are so many contributing factors that go into it. The people of this
province and the people of the country – and, again, I'm not putting blame on
anybody, because this has been going on for eons, way before anybody that is sat
in this House of Assembly.
The people of this province right now are surviving;
many are not living. That's not the way we should be living. It's just a
survival game right now and it's very, very sad to watch. It is so sad to watch.
Forty years ago, many families lived comfortably with one person, whether it be
a mom or a dad working, and then the other person staying home. It created that
family dynamic which seems to be missing the past few years. I think that's
something we have to get back to because it's much different today than it was
back then. I would love to see it now again.
In this year's budget, I'm very happy to see the $2,000
family Physical Activity Tax Credit. It's going to get people moving, hopefully.
It's going to get those kids out. I think it benefits about 3,500 families. It's
fantastic to see. It's something we need because, again, it's heartbreaking to
see a child who cannot participate with his or her friends because of a money
situation. It's heartbreaking and you know what? These are the things that I
talk about. I'll never be the smartest person in the room, and I can live with
that, but my heart absolutely breaks sometimes, and that's exactly why I'm here.
I've lived some of it, so these are the things I enjoy talking about.
It's what we see on the faces each and every day.
Again, this is going to sound a little bit different, but you drive through the
city, stop at a traffic light and just look at the car next to you. Just look at
the worry and anxiety on people's faces as they try to think about how they're
going to get through the next day. It's hard to think about. It's hard to do.
We're with the people of the province and we have to work better here together
to make sure that they're taken care of as well.
The sugar tax: I'd like to touch on that for a second.
It may sound great on the surface, but I'm just wondering how this would make a
difference for healthy, affordable food when it comes to the people that we're
trying to put it in effect for. Right now, I don't know if it gives them more
price on something that's terrible, instead of bringing down the price of
something that can be very good for you.
The tobacco and alcohol tax is another thing. You know
what? It's not that I disagree with it, it sounds great in theory, but we have
to keep in mind, too, the implications. There are families out there, and men
and women, who are going to have these substances no matter what. If they have
to take from another portion of their family's income, that's exactly what
they're going to do. We need to keep these families in mind as well. It sounds
great on the surface, but if it's going to start taking away from a kid's hockey
registration or whatnot, that's something we should consider moving forward when
it comes to these taxes, and have certain things in place to help these people
out as well.
The tax increase to people making over $135,000: people
need to pay their fair share of taxes, absolutely. In doing so, I just want to
recognize those hard-working men and women throughout Newfoundland and Labrador
who work hard every single day and pay their taxes. I want to thank them.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
TIBBS:
Absolutely, it's great. I take my fair share, absolutely. The rotational workers
that put it on the line every single day. Whether they're in Uganda, whether
they're in Scotland, whether they're in Alberta or anywhere else, these people
go away and every tax dollar pretty much comes home right here. It's fantastic.
I did it for 17 years as well. I didn't mind doing it. I was happy to bring all
that money back to my province.
These people, rotational workers, we need to make sure
that we keep them as happy and engaged as we possibly can. They just had a very
rough year, as everybody has, but I know rotational workers who, cumulative,
haven't seen their families in three months over the past year. They sacrificed,
they did what they had to do, but I want to recognize those rotational workers
and let you know that our hearts are with you as well.
My portfolio is Immigration, skills, labour and
population growth, some very important line items when it comes to moving
forward in this province. Immigration: I want to thank anybody who comes from a
different country to come to our beautiful province to work, work hard and
contribute and to see the benefits of living here. It's absolutely fantastic.
We have some great people out my way. Some very close
friends of mine, Rahul and Jibin – these gentlemen come over and, boy, they work
very, very hard. They hunt and they fish. They love it here. It's exactly what
we want because we have to stop this revolving door of bringing in the
immigration and sending them out the other way. We need to try to keep them
right here, in my opinion the most beautiful province in all of Canada.
Skills and labour: We have a huge skill set right here
in Newfoundland and Labrador and we need to make sure that we let everybody know
that. The men and women of Newfoundland and Labrador – when I worked out West,
there were two requirements when I applied for just about any job. The first
requirement was, of course, where are you from? Newfoundland and Labrador?
Great, you just ticked off one box because we know how hard working you're going
to be. The second requirement was do you have a family? Absolutely, because they
knew that you would have to stick around and work for a paycheque. I just want
to recognize the skilled labour unions, the skilled labour people we have in
Newfoundland and Labrador and thank you for everything you put in.
The community benefits agreement: We've been talking
about it and kicking it around since I've been here since 2019, and I'm sure
well before me throughout different administrations. I keep hearing that, yes,
it's something we're working on, something we're working on. Are we working on
it? Let's see the progression on this. Let's see the progression to the point
where we can start putting Newfoundlanders and Labradorians first, the people
that actually work here.
I am still dumbfounded by the people putting up drywall
in the Corner Brook hospital brought in from out of province. It's still mind
boggling to me. I don't read it in a report, I talk to the people over there,
that work there and they're telling me the exact same thing. I'm just wondering
how we got there. I know it's not an overnight fix, but it's something – I keep
hearing: We're working on it; we're working on it, working on it. Where is the
progression? Please show me the progression so I can at least add something and
we can start putting Newfoundlanders and Labradorians first.
Population growth, two questions: How do we keep people
in this province? I constantly hear young people nowadays, I can't wait to get
out of this hole – can't wait, can't wait, can't wait. We need to keep these
people here. If we don't keep our young people here, the province is done. It
truly is. The second, of course: how to get new people to come to our province.
How do we attract them? How do we let them know that Newfoundland and Labrador
is well open for business and this is the place where you want to be?
Those are some questions I put forward when it comes to
population growth, because that is the sustainability of our province moving
forward. There are a lot of contributing factors around it, but for the most
part, population growth, more revenue, if we can get some good people here
working, back to work, I think that we're going to be just fine.
Putting people first and employment in Newfoundland and
Labrador, how do we do that? Well, put people first. Crown Lands: there are so
many issues with the department of Crown Lands it's not even funny. I would
venture to say that 30 per cent of the people that call my office have an issue
with Crown Lands.
In Newfoundland and Labrador, some people would say we
are at a disadvantage because of our spread-out population of 525,000 people.
It's a unique opportunity for us to have land, for us to have a cottage. So how
is it that it takes two to three years to get a piece of Crown land? That's
still beyond me. I still have never had an answer for it.
I've heard people say, oh, no, it only takes 60 or 90
days. I challenge anybody in this province who has gotten a piece of Crown land
in 60 or 90 days, let me know, please, because I haven't had one person in my
district who got it in 60 or 90 days. They're waiting years, so that's something
that I think that we should get a handle on as well.
The outfitters here in the province, they just had a
hard year. I want to acknowledge the outfitters. I just had an outfitter in my
district show me the receipt he had for two guys that wanted to come from Texas.
They had to pay for their own flights, five days, for two caribou and two moose
coming up this fall. Hopefully they get to see it. Thirty-six thousand dollars
for the two of them. That's amazing revenue to bring into the province.
Hopefully, the outfitters get to do their thing coming up now in the fall, open
up, and we have a great fall hunt with those guys as well, and girls.
People with disabilities; seniors, once again; the most
vulnerable, for the most part: This is why we pay our taxes; we try to keep them
in mind. It's incumbent, I feel as though, on all Newfoundlanders and
Labradorians, too. Let's not just shut ourselves in and say: Do you know what?
It's not my problem. It's all of ours issue. You know the ones that are the most
vulnerable in your communities.
I'm not just talking to the MHAs; I'm talking to
everybody in Newfoundland and Labrador. If you know somebody who might
appreciate a bowl of soup or a phone call or something like that, reach out to
them. It's incumbent on all of us. That's what Newfoundlanders and Labradorians
have been known for: to take care of each other. I know we can do that, because
we've done it in the past and we can do it again.
Data centres: In Grand Falls-Windsor in 2016, we had a
proposal for data centres to come. It would have brought hundreds of millions of
dollars over years to the province. At the time, for one reason or another, it
wasn't done. Dame Moya Greene mentioned it when we had a conversation, that this
would be a great place for data centres. I think it's something that we have to
address moving forward. I think it's something that can be brought here. When
you talk about technology and the future of this province, something like data
centres can definitely benefit us here in Newfoundland and Labrador.
Great things are going up in the Grand Falls-Windsor -
Buchans District. Marathon Gold and the mining, I can't thank those people
enough for coming up. They have been giving so much to the communities already.
It's fantastic to see. Of course, the employment is what we're going to have. I
thank the government for taking the right steps and getting Marathon Gold up
there and keeping them engaged. They're very happy, from what I'm hearing, so
I'm very happy as well.
In closing, Mr. Speaker, I just want to thank everybody
for doing their part and stepping up. I want to encourage the people across
Canada, across Newfoundland and Labrador. We just went through over a year of
hell. Seventy-five per cent of the population is about to get vaccinated almost.
This place is about to open wide up. Have the best summer of our lives. Travel
around this province; see what it's all about. See the people. Have a great
summer.
In closing, to all of us inside the House of Assembly,
I encourage all of you, please, remain humble in your jobs.
Thank you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Member for Humber - Bay of Islands.
JOYCE:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I'm going to have just a few words on the budget and
the issues today.
First of all, I always, forefront, like to thank the
people of Humber - Bay of Islands for their support once again. It's pretty
difficult running against two parties, but I always said that when you stay in
touch with the people who elected you, they will reward you. I do have and I did
have a great working relationship with all the town councils and all the working
groups and the firefighters, all the seniors' groups. I just want to recognize
them and thank them for their support.
As I said before, back to 1999 when I first got
elected, I'll make two commitments to the district: I'll be available and
dependable. Those are the only two commitments I ever made in the almost 30
years in politics. I just want to recognize the campaign team, Donny Johnson and
the campaign team for getting me elected, again. Sometimes it's a tough chore to
get me elected, but it worked out. Thanks Donny and all the crew that helped
out.
First of all, I say to the Minister of Finance, you've
got a tough job. There is absolutely no doubt about it, you have a tough job.
You'll be criticized, you'll be ridiculed and you'll have people coming at you
from all fronts. I've been there back with Hubert Kitchen, and it's just the
nature of the job. I say to all the people of the province, all the interested
groups, all the unions, let's do it in a way that is constructive for
Newfoundland and Labrador.
I remember when Clyde Wells made a statement and people
criticized him. He said: If I put horns on my head and I put a devil's hat on,
is it going to change the issue? The answer is no. So what we should do is go
after the issue. This is an issue, collectively, for the Province of
Newfoundland and Labrador. This is no individual issue here in this province, in
this House of Assembly. It's an issue for the Province of Newfoundland and
Labrador.
We're going to have disagreements, definitely. We're
definitely going to have different points of view, that's just the nature. We're
going to have interest groups coming at the government, we're going to have
unions – which they should. That's their role. That's their role, to put their
thoughts forward for their membership.
I remember – I said it before, and I'll keep repeating
it every opportunity I get – in 1992 when there was a major fiscal crisis and
everybody was concerned that the Liberal government was in power that if you
went off and made the necessary decisions you had to make, that you had an
election coming up, and I remember I said to Clyde Wells, and I said it in this
House many times, going to Gillams when I brought it up to him again, some of
the peoples' concerns. He said: I'd rather lose the election with honesty than
win with dishonesty. When he ran in 1993, he received more seats than he did in
1989, even after the situation that he had to face and that he did face.
Honesty, with it all, is a very big part of it.
I'll just go through some of the issues that I know out
on the West Coast and bring them forth and how to deal with it. One of the
biggest issues – and it's a tough issue; it's a federal-provincial-municipal
issue – is housing. It's a tough issue. Social housing, it is definitely a tough
issue. This just can't come on the minister's back or in his department, this is
collectively with the federal government. As much as we put into social housing,
as much as we put into repairs, there's still a great need for it in the
Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
If there's one thing that would help the people of
Newfoundland and Labrador, who sometimes are struggling or sometimes just can't
meet the demand that they need for their families, is housing. I don't have the
solution. I know there's money put forth on a regular basis, but if we can solve
the housing issue, if we can help more people to get into housing that they can
afford, that they can say this is ours, they have some form and some type of
stability in their lives, it will make this province much better.
I don't have the answers. I don't think government has
the answers. This is an approach with the federal government, a long-term
approach with the federal-provincial-municipal governments and social groups in
the areas. That's the number one issue that would change a lot of lives for
families and kids in this Province of Newfoundland and Labrador is housing.
You hear it up in Lab West, it's the same condition.
This is not a knock because I've been in government, out of government and this
is continuous, but that's the biggest issue that I hear is that we can help
people in Newfoundland and Labrador if we ever get a strategy where we can get
social housing where people have stability; stability in their lives so that
they know here's what I have to pay for rent, here's what I can do and the kids
have this sense of belonging and the kids have a sense that they're stable. It
will make some difference. How we do it, I think that is something we all have
to put our minds to and work it out.
Of course, then there's COVID; we've been lucky in
COVID. I'm sad that we had a few deaths through COVID, but a lot of front-line
workers all throughout the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador – what COVID
made you aware of more so than before are mental health issues. Again, I know a
couple of budgets the province worked on that. We need a mental health strategy.
There are always underlying – often mental health issues. This is not just
mental health because someone has an issue today; this is a long-term strategy
because mental health issues are long term. Once the issue is (inaudible) and
they're struggling and you get help, you can't just say, okay, you're good now,
just cut it off.
If one thing that COVID has shown in the Province of
Newfoundland and Labrador is that our mental health strategy has to be updated
and helped. We probably need a lot more social workers; we need mental help
crisis teams. Housing and the mental health issues during COVID have been two of
the major issues that you hear of people.
You always hear people want to come back to the
province and you deal with the COVID through the Department of Health and
Community Services. But when you hear the people on the end of the line or when
you're chatting to them and they're going through a rough time with the COVID,
of course, we all know, away from their families, then you can't do the things
you can do and, financially, it kicks in. It is a tough time for a lot of
people.
I just want to bring that up to the government. Again,
this is no easy solution – absolutely no easy solution whatsoever. This is no
criticism of our mental health workers, no criticism of the Department of Health
and Community Services as we speak; it is just something that has reared its
ugly head much, much more than it ever has before. You hear it, you see it, you
speak to people and you try to deal with it.
I noticed on many occasions that we're talking about
the economy and oil and gas. You hear some people on one spectrum say let's get
rid of oil and gas, but I always ask the question when they say let's just get
rid of it, drop it right away – the question is: How are you going to pay for
the services that you want? It's a big issue.
There is another thing when you're talking to the
youth. The youth are moving to a green economy. Us old fogeys like it or not,
they're moving to a green economy. What we have to do is put initiatives in
place; put some good strategies in place because the younger generation coming
up today, I can assure you, will find a way to turn our province into a green
economy. They will. It may take 10, 15 years but they will.
I heard the Member for Grand Falls-Windsor - Buchans
talk about keeping our youth. One way we can keep our youth is to put in place
some kind of strategy for more initiatives for the green economy. They will
develop it. I can assure you, they will. If you want to find some way to keep
the youth home, that is the way to do it, to set up an initiative that they can
roll up their sleeves and show us – listen, this is a new world here now. We
will show you how it's done.
I have confidence in the youth. I know a lot of the
youth that want to stay in Newfoundland and Labrador will do whatever they can
to stay in Newfoundland and Labrador. As a government and others, I would say we
need just to put it in place for the youth to expand and to grow themselves, and
Newfoundland and Labrador will be a much better place – and off the fossil
fuels, but it can't be done overnight.
Mr. Speaker, I'm going to go through a few things in
the budget here. I'll just pick up a few highlights of the budget. Of course, we
know we're facing tough times. If there's any advice that I can give the
minister, if you want to take it, it's be honest with – and I know you will –
people up front. Tell them, here's the situation.
I can assure the minister – and I know my colleague,
the Member for Mount Pearl - Southlands, said it – I have no problem supporting
government in any good initiative for the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
I have no problem, if there's a good initiative or if there's something that we
have to do as the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador, standing up and
supporting it shoulder to shoulder with the government, if it's going to be
beneficial to Newfoundland and Labrador.
I know myself and my colleague from Mount Pearl -
Southlands discussed this. We're not here in this House to always criticize the
government; we're here to help the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador and
help our districts. We had many discussions on this. This is not us and them;
this is all of us together. I know I'm speaking on behalf of my colleague from
Mount Pearl - Southlands, that we will support the government in any good
initiative. Any tough decision that you have to make, if it's in the best
interests of Newfoundland and Labrador, you won't just hear me or my colleague
stand up and criticize because we might get a few brownie points. It won't
happen. It just won't happen. I want to put that out there.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
JOYCE:
Mr.
Speaker, I just want to talk about a few things. I just made a few notes on the
Budget Speech that the minister made. You look at the Newfoundland and Labrador
Centre for Health Information: that's going to be brought into the core of
government. I remember going back a nice while; we had them in the Public
Accounts. There were pay increases going down at that centre.
We asked who gave you permission. The chair, who sat
right here – they were sitting right here, right in front of me. They sat here
and they said, how did you get that? Oh, we spoke to the minister, with a wink
and nod, and said go ahead. We said, well, did you get anything in writing? No.
The pay increase was so huge that it even stuck out for the Auditor General.
Just to be able to do it on their own because they're not under government and
they're off on their own.
We were astonished. We said who gave you permission? It
says in the guidelines that you have to get approval from the minister. I'm not
going to get into who the minister was or anything like that, it's just why some
of this makes good sense. The chair, who sat here, said, yeah, I spoke to him
and he winked at me and said okay. That was it. If you ever look at the pay –
I'm sure the Minister of Finance looked at the pay scales down there. It's
unbelievable. They can do it without any questions asked, just walk in.
Bringing that into core of government and putting them
under the same scale as government will save a lot of money. I know it will be
much more beneficial to the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
HON. MEMBER:
Already being done.
JOYCE:
What?
HON. MEMBER:
Already being done.
JOYCE:
Already being done? Perfect. That's great news I'll say to the minister.
The other thing is the 911. I had that all arranged
before and we backed off on it. I won't get into the reasons why. I don't have
the figures here now, but I would be willing to bet they have a surplus in their
account, a large surplus. I'm willing to bet right here right now, they have a
large surplus.
When 911 was set up in Corner Brook – and I'm not
knocking Corner Brook. Does anybody in this House – and I asked the minister of
Finance and I asked the minister of Transportation at the time, how did the City
of Corner Brook get being paid by 911 without ever going to tender?
Do you know how that happened? These are the kinds of
things that cost the taxpayers money because they upped their phone bills. Do
you know how that happened? A wink and nod between the minister of Finance at
the time and the mayor of the City of Corner Brook. Let's put it in the City of
Corner Brook, never even went to tender. They're paying the City of Corner Brook
annual rent for 911 in Corner Brook. Plus the City of Corner Brook is getting an
administration fee from 911 and the taxpayers don't even know they're getting
it, so bringing that under core government.
I remember visiting an ambulance service out in
Clarenville. I remember looking at their system they got for ambulance and for
calls. It's well advanced more than 911 – well advanced. You have callers, you
have professional people on the line – 911 callers are great, too, they're
great, but they can track the call, they have a system of what questions to ask.
Yet, for some reason, everybody was protecting their own little territory at the
time; that 911 couldn't come into core government.
I applaud that move and when it's done look at the best
services that you can apply for 911. I advise whatever department in Municipal
Affairs that comes under to look at the best way to supply those services. That
alone will help a lot in the areas around their concerns with 911.
I applaud the workers. I know a lot of them in the
Corner Brook area, but the way it was set up and even right now, still paying
the rental fee to the City of Corner Brook without any tender, whatsoever, and
paying an administration fee to the City of Corner Brook, and the taxpayers of
the province are paying for this all over this province; their cellphone is
paying for that right now as we speak. That's good moves.
I also noticed in the thing: “A House of Assembly
committee will be created to review financial statements, budgets, and the
annual reports of Crown corporations and organizations.” That is a great
strategy; a great move. The only thing I'll ask government on that is to give it
some teeth. Just don't have them come in and say: Okay, here it is. Make people
answerable to the decisions that they make when the funds are given out.
It's a great strategy. I'm sure once we sit down, a lot
of the issues, a lot of concerns that we do have will be taken care of, a lot of
questions you will have. But there may be some questions there that will be
questionable and some things that you may be able to offer suggestions. We all
know, once we know there's oversight then people are more thoughtful and more
apt to make sure that they got everything done in a proper manner.
That is a great idea, and a great suggestion is that
give it some teeth to whoever is on the Committee. I know the Member for Mount
Pearl - Southlands has been pushing this. I've been hearing this in my ears for
a long while, about him pushing to have this oversight Committee. I'm glad that
the government listened to it and will respond, but give it teeth so that you
can hold people accountable and make suggestions for improvements.
Another good positive thing – and I'm not going to get
into the financial part – is bringing the school boards under the Department of
Education. We hear it here – and I have been trying this for years and even when
you're in government people always got their – but with government we can do
this now. I'll tell you what it is: when people who have coached sports like I
have and been around and I hear it with the youth, do you know one thing we
don't do in rural Newfoundland and Labrador? We always talk about health for the
kids, but we don't open the schools past 3:30 or 4 o'clock.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
JOYCE:
rural Newfoundland and Labrador, if you want healthy kids, what do you do? You
give them access to facilities. Do you know right now we can't get the schools
open past 3:30? They go home. Ball hockey, basketball, volleyball, gymnastics,
anybody who wants to go in, it can't be done. I will say to the minister, if you
want the youth to be healthy, get the schools open in the nighttime, in the
afternoons so that the kids can be healthy and be athletic.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh,
oh!
SPEAKER:
Order, please!
I recognize the hon. the Member for Torngat Mountains.
EVANS:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I think people kind of cringe when I get ready to speak
because it is all doom and gloom, but my district has so many gaps in services
and infrastructure that if I want to speak on the reality of the conditions in
my district, it has got to be doom and gloom.
I want to say a couple things, sitting in Opposition a
big part of your role is to critique the government and to hold the government
accountable. A lot of times when you have a district like mine that has been
neglected and has so many gaps in services and doesn't have adequate
infrastructure, a lot of times it becomes negative.
During the election, the ongoing never-ending election
from – I don't know if I can say it – hell.
HON. MEMBER:
Pretty close.
EVANS:
Pretty close, yeah.
It was a good bonding time for me and my mother because
we were bubbling together. My mother is older and it was a good experience. We
talked about the Minister of Health because we were dealing a lot with Level 5,
we were at Alert Level 5; we were locked down. I already said this to the
Minister of Health because I took the time to talk to him. She said: You know
the Minister of Health, he's a good doctor. He's a good man.
People see me out there in the media, and people see me
questioning in the House, and part of my role is to be critical because in my
district there are huge gaps in health services, which the minister has
acknowledged. I just wanted to tell people that when you criticize people,
that's one thing, but when you critique a government on their delivery of
services that everybody needs, it's a different thing.
My mother's comments about the Minister of Health, when
he was a doctor, was he was a really good doctor. He had a wonderful bedside
manner. He was very caring and compassionate. I think she said, again, he was a
very good doctor. I just wanted to acknowledge that.
When we look at the team that we have looking after us
during COVID, we had a really great doctor, as our Minister of Health, and we
had Dr. Fitzgerald.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
EVANS:
want to acknowledge that. It's not always about criticism and it's certainly not
personal criticism, attack on people. This is something we need to be aware of,
especially at budget time. I just wanted to make that point that we do
appreciate you, Minister of Health – I can't say his name. The people of
Labrador really appreciated you as a doctor.
Moving on now, also I just wanted to talk a little bit
about the search and rescue inquiry that's ongoing. The reason why I wanted to
say that is I think it's important to explain to people.
Back in 2012 when Burton was missing and the community
of Makkovik and the neighbouring communities rallied around and went and helped
and searched; people came down from different communities, going around on
Ski-Doo, in the back of komatik boxes looking for this 14-year-old boy. We never
successfully found him and it was heartbreaking.
People were upset and people were angry and people
protested including myself, all my siblings and everybody. It was so dramatic.
Now, we look, nine years later, and the inquiry is going on; you can hardly get
anyone to comment on it. But I want to explain to the people that it's not
because we lost interest. It's not because we don't care. It's not that we're
not upset. It's important to make that distinction.
Actually, I thought about it last night and I wrote it
down so I could go back to sleep. I said that time moves the pain and
overwhelming loss that we suffer to a place that's not quite – and I couldn't
put a word on it. But time moves that pain to a place where it's not as
crushing. Nine years: to describe how we feel now with time, that pain and loss
of what happened to that young boy that was family and community to us, it
created like a veil, a transparent veil that you could look through. It covers
you but it's always there. You never forget it, that loss that's there.
That pain has changed now to that veil and it's not a
crushing feeling, it's not a knife that stabs you anymore. A lot of people who
go through extreme grief and loss know what I'm talking about. So when the
people in Makkovik and the people on the North Coast are not screaming out on
Facebook, not going to the media talking about the long delay of this inquiry,
it's not because we don't care about what happened to Burton Winters. It's not
because we don't feel the loss. It's not because we're not angry that it took
three days for aerial search and rescue to come and find him within a half an
hour of entering the airspace of where he was. It's important for people to
realize that, but also it's important for people, especially people in
government and people who make decisions on when an inquiry actually happens –
it's important to realize that you're impacting people's faith in the system. I
have to tell you, we don't have much faith in systems. We don't have much trust.
We really don't.
It's important for people to realize that because
sometimes in politics it's a strategy to draw things out. We'll wait them out.
Eventually they'll forget about it and they'll move on, they'll turn to
something else. The media does. We know that. The media loses interest in a day.
That strategy really betrays people's trust. It does. It's important for people
to acknowledge that and talk about it.
Also, just looking at the memory of Burton Winters – 14
years old. When you read about it, they say that he perished because his
snowmobile broke down. His snowmobile didn't break down. Basically, he drove
until he got into the rough ice; I think he ran out of gas. Then he walked for
19 kilometres. If he could have found refuge, he would have actually saved
himself.
It was a long delay. We have to realize that the
inquiry is not about being negative or criticizing; this inquiry is supposed to
be about finding answers to make sure that our children don't suffer the way
Burton Winters did and our families don't go through that loss. So that,
eventually, the pain is more like a veil than a sharp knife stabbing you. Even
though you feel anger, you don't actually come out and talk about it.
I saw it in the eyes of people this winter. As an MHA,
I didn't know if they want me to talk about it. Also, when the inquiry was
coming up, I wasn't sure if they wanted to put forward all those concerns,
complaints, issues and questions. It was just kind of like we just have to let
it be just so that pain doesn't come back. We just have to try and hope that
they do a good job of this inquiry because, if not, it's going to happen again.
Anyway, moving on to our budget – 29 pages. Everyone's
complaint is it's light on the details. I think it's nine sentences for
Labrador, right at the end of the book. It's almost like they forgot: Oh my
goodness, we forgot about Labrador, we have to stick something in there. I'm
being facetious, but anyway.
I'm pleased that there's mention in the budget about
the Nain airstrip. I'm hoping it's a mistake where it says the prefeasibility
study, because we've been waiting now years for the feasibility study. I could
be critical and I could say I'm still disappointed with the provincial
government's failure to step up to cost share. That really created this long
delay.
I went to Nain with the MP for Labrador. The federal
government was willing to step up and cost share. In her words, in front of the
Executive Council, she said that up to 70 to 80 per cent of the cost of the
feasibility study – because they were so concerned of the ongoing delays. Now we
have the $3 million, the cost share, but still we have to go through the
feasibility study. Then, they're going to start construction if the money is
there.
A lot of people in the province don't understand why I
keep talking about the Nain airstrip. The Nain airstrip doesn't have night
lights.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh,
oh!
SPEAKER:
Order, please!
EVANS:
During non-daylight hours, they can't medevac. You can call search and rescue,
as the former minister of Transportation said, but we all know that often, when
you call, they're not available. Even if they're available, it takes time to
mobilize. A medical evacuation is a medical emergency. It's disappointing that
it took so long and it is still going to take a few years, so people's lives
will still be in jeopardy.
There is also harm that doesn't result in death due to
delays. If anyone doesn't believe me, they should listen to a young guy from
Nain who was struck by a snowmobile in the head. In actual fact, he was being
interviewed one day, when we were talking about the Nain airstrip, and he talked
about what the doctor said to him about his condition being legally blind. Some
of it is actually the impacts to his brain and how things could have been
different if he could have been medevaced out sooner.
In addition to that, we have conditions that if you
don't get timely emergency care, it can impact your organs. Organ damage –
irreversible organ damage. It's so important that we have that ability to
medevac. If we had the road, the Trans-Labrador Highway connection, we could use
ground transportation. It would be so important.
That moves me to the next item in the budget that I
want to talk about: the prefeasibility study for the road to the North Coast. I
have seven minutes left; I'm just going to read it so it's in
Hansard . Page 29: “Construction of the
Trans-Labrador Highway is nearing completion. Paving of the highway continues
with a $22.1 million investment this year and we anticipate this vital road
network will be completed over the next two constructions seasons.”
My entire District of Torngat Mountains, the North
Coast, five Inuit communities, one Innu community, either it's going to be
divine intervention where we're going to have a paved highway within the next
short period, or we're not a part of Labrador, because that's the way I
interpret the language. In actual fact, if we're not a part of Labrador, we're
certainly not a part of this Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
With a road – a road brings so much. A road will bring
so much to my district. It would actually help with housing insecurity. A
building lot right now, the cost of putting in a building lot, not the land, the
cost of putting in a building lot costs $250,000, another $200,000 to $250,000
on top of that, so the cost of a house right now on the North Coast is probably
going to be $400,000 to $500,000; a half a million dollars for a small, modest
house.
Who can afford that? Also the fact that we don't have
road access and we don't have the freight boat from the Island, our building
materials and all of our costs have gone up. Even with repairs, now a lot of
people can't even afford repairs to their house. It's difficult. It's very
difficult for people.
I'm really glad that we have the announcement of the
$200,000 in last year's budget. I was disappointed that there was no real work
done on it, but, hopefully, this year, we'll get to actually do the
pre-feasibility work.
Anyway, I'm trying to be positive. I should talk about
the resilience of our people since Confederation, since Joey and the government
brought us into Confederation. It's hard to do that when I look at the gaps, the
gaps in services and infrastructure development. This didn't happen overnight;
this happened over a long period of time, where we didn't get equal access to
services and to infrastructure. Money has to be shared and has to be divvied
out. I think that actually a lot of it never came to the North Coast but went to
other regions, and over time the gaps got bigger and bigger. You just have to
come to my district and see it.
Now, cellphone service is a luxury. We don't have
cellphone service in Nain. There's a short radius where they put in a short
satellite box on the tower and they do have some cellphone service, but the rest
of the North Coast don't have that. It would be nice. On the North Coast, we
don't have real high-speed Internet. Also, in some areas the infrastructure is
so old that even when the technician comes in, he can't repair it. We get 0.2 to
1.9 megabits per second.
I was in Rigolet trying to be on Zoom, 10 minutes for
it to load and then it worked, but when I tried to do something after hours, I
couldn't get it to load. I wondered then, well, what's happening with our
post-secondary students who are doing courses online? What's happening during a
lockdown when we're trying to have our kids in school? Are they really asleep
and just pretending to watch the tablet that does not actually have anything on
it?
It's also hard to be uplifting and feeling all good,
warm and cozy when the lack of highway access and the removal of the freight
boat have driven the prices of food up. I showed the picture around of the four
pork chops for $28 in the winter. Another one just came up, three freezer-burned
chicken breasts for $44. Now, these are actual pictures. They're a little bit
extreme, but the cost – I can tell you how much coffee costs in Nain because one
of my main staples is coffee.
The issue is 215 little bodies were found buried at a
residential school, and it's a reminder to us that there was real harm done at
residential schools. Not everybody was able to overcome that, and a lot of
people had problems and they didn't do well in life and their children didn't do
well in life. Now, we sit back and we blame them; we blame them for being
alcoholics, we blame them for domestic violence, we blame them for abuse and we
blame them for the inability to parent. It's sad. Even people who were able to
be good parents and able to actually overcome a lot of the hardships, they're
not all there. They're not all whole.
When you look at those 215 little graves – well, it was
actually a mass grave – one thing I want to point out is that with residential
schools, children came home, but they weren't whole. They never really came
home. When you go to boarding school at the age of five –
SPEAKER (Bennett):
Order, please!
Your time has expired.
EVANS:
Yes, thank you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Government House Leader.
CROCKER:
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
I move, seconded by the Minister of Immigration,
Population Growth and Skills, that we now adjourn debate.
SPEAKER:
accordance with paragraph 9(1)(
b) of the
Standing Orders , the House do stand recessed until 2 p.m. this afternoon.
Recess
The House resumed at 2 p.m.
SPEAKER (Bennett):
Admit strangers.
Order, please!
Statements by Members
SPEAKER:
Today we will hear statements from the hon. Members for the Districts of Harbour
Main, St. John's Centre, Topsail - Paradise, Placentia West - Bellevue and
Torngat Mountains.
The hon. the Member for Harbour Main.
CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
On Sunday May 2, I had the honour of attending a food
drive at the Star of the Sea in Holyrood. The food drive was in support of an
initiative called the Little Free Pantries. These are little roadside cupboards,
little mini food banks, if you will, which have been springing up all over the
Avalon Peninsula with the goal of helping people who may be struggling with food
insecurities. They operate on a take-what-you-need, leave-what-you-can,
no-questions-asked basis. The District of Harbour Main has many pantries
throughout the district in communities like Upper Gullies, Seal Cove, Holyrood,
Avondale and Colliers, just to name a few.
Ms. Charlotte Wade, one of the volunteers who has led
this initiative in Holyrood, has worked in the food industry her entire life.
She recognized that people were in need, some were struggling to make ends meet
and many unable to put food on their table.
I ask all hon. Members to please join me in recognizing
the founders of this worthwhile initiative, people like Charlotte Wade of
Holyrood. This initiative is growing rapidly throughout the province and I am
proud to say has a strong presence in many of the communities that I am pleased
to represent.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Member for St. John's Centre.
DINN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, Buckmaster's Circle Community Centre is
more than a not-for-profit; it is the heart of the community and has been
serving residents in the Buckmaster's Circle area since 1993, creating a sense
of belonging and connectedness based on support and respect.
Three dedicated, full-time staff provide social,
educational, recreational, health and employment programs and services to
everyone within the community. Partnerships are essential in meeting the
centre's broad mandate. With Eastern Health's support, the centre maintains an
on-site clinic staffed by a Public Health nurse and part-time nurse
practitioner. Newfoundland and Labrador Housing provides a family support social
worker, one of two positions shared between five St. John's community centres.
COVID-19 required the centre to be creative and change
program and service delivery. During the pandemic's peak, staff provided
outreach services to families and seniors living alone, made check-in phone
calls, provided breakfast bags to school-age children, delivered food hampers to
single-parent families, supported families with technology for school, ensured
residents filed their income tax returns and much more.
I ask Members to join me in recognizing the small but
mighty staff at Buckmaster's Community Centre and their commitment to the people
they serve.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Member for Topsail - Paradise.
DINN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Ryder Rowsell, a Grade 6 student at Paradise
Elementary, has been growing his hair out since Grade 2. After years of growing
his hair, Ryder has decided it's time for a cut and see his hair turned into a
wig. Not only is he cutting his hair, but he is raising money for Young Adult
Cancer Canada.
Ryder, along with his mother, have been working on a
project and created a GoFundMe page, Ryder's Epic Haircut For Kids With Cancer,
with an ultimate goal of raising about $5,000 by June 23. Ryder says: when
school is out June 24, I'm going to come to school that day with a new backpack,
a new haircut and everyone is going to look at me and wonder, who is that?
Young Adult Cancer Canada, founded in 2000, serves
young adults affected by cancer. Over 8,000 young adults are diagnosed with
cancer in Canada each year and its programs help young adults who have been
recently diagnosed and are currently receiving treatment or have survived
cancer.
Mr. Speaker, I congratulate Ryder on his tremendous
effort to bring awareness and support to Young Adult Cancer Canada.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Member for Placentia West - Bellevue.
DWYER:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I sit in this hon. Chamber today to show my
appreciation for a project that was completed by the Grade 5 to 7 students at
Swift Current Academy in our beautiful District of Placentia West - Bellevue.
I had the privilege of being included in a virtual
presentation of their deep-learning project. The students' concern was the
speeding that takes place on Seaview Drive through their community. This is the
main road that runs through their community, which is a part of Route 210, but
is indeed the main road in this picturesque Town of Swift Current.
The Grade 5 to 7 students created surveys for the
residents to complete, tracked the number of speeding cars at various times of
the day, organized an awareness walk in their community and also made posters
with the slogan: Slow down. This is a community, not a racetrack.”
I am incredibly proud of these students for stepping
up, recognizing an issue within their community and coming together to create
change and become part of the solution. You're all true community leaders.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Member for Torngat Mountains.
EVANS:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Today, I'd like to pay tribute to Travis Winters in
Makkovik, Nunatsiavut, for his quick action and bravery that saved his uncle,
Harold Winters. Travis and Amos Fox were out in a boat near Lance Ground when
their speedboat broke down. Travis's Uncle Harold was nearby and was able to tow
them back to Makkovik. They remained in their boat during the tow.
Close to home, the strain of towing the boat caused the
risers to break away, releasing the tow line. The rope snapped across Harold's
body, knocking him into the frigid water. This created a very dangerous
situation. The unmanned boat, with motor still running, circling Harold in the
water.
Harold was at risk of being hit. Icy waters also
exacerbated a medical condition, impacting Harold's ability to stay afloat,
while putting him at risk of drowning. Travis's large boat made it impossible to
be able to row over and rescue Harold in time to prevent him from being struck,
or worse, slipping below the surface.
As the unmanned boat made its third pass, it was close
enough, so Travis took a great risk and jumped into the boat, resulting in minor
injury to himself and thereby being able to save his Uncle Harold.
Please join me in applauding Travis Winters for his
bravery and courage.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
SPEAKER:
Statements by Ministers.
Statements by Ministers
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Minister of Municipal and Provincial Affairs.
HOWELL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, September 28 is municipal election day in
Newfoundland and Labrador. This is an excellent opportunity for residents to get
involved in their communities.
Prior to entering provincial politics, I had the honour
to serve as the mayor of St. Anthony, and before that, as a councillor for
several years. It was a rewarding experience. It was incredibly busy at times
and certainly not without its challenges, but it did provide me the insight into
the importance of local government.
The Department of Municipal and Provincial Affairs has
been preparing for the election through providing support to municipalities and
guidance on the election process and legislative requirements. A circular has
been sent to towns with information on municipal mail-in balloting and the
department is providing elections training.
Several municipalities are considering and making plans
for a mail-in option, in light of the ongoing COVID pandemic. While the vaccine
roll out is going very well across the province and we reached an incredible
milestone with the 300,000 first doses –
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
HOWELL:
we do recognize that mail-in ballots is another option to make voting as
accessible as possible to all residents.
Municipalities Newfoundland and Labrador, or MNL, as we
say, is also an excellent resource for communities and is encouraging
participation through the Make Your Mark campaign. We are pleased to provide
$20,000 to MNL to support this work.
Mr. Speaker, I want to thank all those currently
serving on councils and acknowledge the recent appointments of Amy Coady-Davis
as president and Trina Appleby as vice-president of the board of MNL. I wish
them both well in their new roles.
I ask all hon. Members to join me in encouraging all
citizens from all backgrounds to consider putting their names forward for
election in the fall.
Thank you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Member for Cape St. Francis.
WALL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and I thank the hon. minister for an advance copy of her
statement.
Mr. Speaker, all of us on this side of the House join
the minister in encouraging everyone to run in the upcoming municipal elections
on September 28.
As a former mayor, myself, of the beautiful Town of
Pouch Cove, I have seen the benefits of municipal representation first-hand.
There is perhaps no greater service than to have your boots on the ground and
represent your friends and neighbours at the community level. Many of my
colleagues on both sides of this hon. House have gotten their start, so to
speak, around the council chamber.
I do hope that the department will endeavour to
encourage more women and gender-diverse candidates to step forward and offer
themselves for this upcoming election. Historically, very few women and
gender-diverse candidates have been elected at all levels of government. I look
forward to seeing the minister roll out her plan to address this issue in the
coming weeks.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Member for St. John's Centre.
DINN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and I, too, thank the minister for an advance copy of
her statement.
I want to give my best to all of the candidates across
the province and the election officials, and thank you for participating in
upholding our democracy.
It's wonderful to see that the municipalities are
accounting for the realities of COVID and are putting a plan in place. It will
serve them well to have their mail-in ballot plans in place and ironed out
before the election. I hope Members of the government are also learning to care
about voter rights in the province during this interaction.
Thank you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
SPEAKER:
Further statements by ministers?
The hon. the Minister Responsible for Women and Gender
Equality.
PARSONS:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Today, I am pleased to recognize the recent
groundbreaking appointments at Municipalities Newfoundland and Labrador. For the
first time in the organization's 70-year history, the top two volunteer roles
are held by women.
President Amy Coady-Davis, who is a Councillor with the
Town of Grand Falls-Windsor and Vice-President Trina Appleby, who is Deputy
Mayor of Torbay, will help guide Municipalities Newfoundland and Labrador as
they work to represent the interests of the province's municipal councils. In
1951, there were approximately 50 incorporated municipalities in Newfoundland
and Labrador. Today, there are 276.
Mr. Speaker, the Office of Women and Gender Equality
recently collaborated with Equal Voice to present a campaign college, which was
designed to help women and gender-diverse folks learn more about running for
elected office. I was very impressed by the number of participants who expressed
an interest in being involved in municipal politics.
I am hopeful that women and gender-diverse individuals
look to the appointments of Ms. Coady-Davis and Ms. Appleby, as well as the
leadership of my colleagues the Minister of Municipal and Provincial Affairs,
the Member for Mount Pearl North, as well as the Member for Cartwright - L'Anse
au Clair as positive signs. As we strive for more diversity amongst our elected
officials, we encourage folks with a range of backgrounds and experiences to
seek elected office, including in the municipal elections this September, and
provide residents of our province with the representation they so rightfully
deserve.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Member for Harbour Main.
CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I thank the minister for an advance copy of her
statement. On behalf of the Official Opposition, I would like to recognize Ms.
Coady-Davis and Ms. Appleby on their appointments as the leadership of
Municipalities Newfoundland and Labrador. I would also like to recognize the
work of Equal Voice as an advocacy and action group who work tirelessly to
support, educate and champion women and gender-diverse individuals as candidate
in our electoral systems.
As the September municipal elections approach, I add my
voice to those who wish to see more gender diversity in municipal leadership
across the province. I want all those who's considering candidacy to know that
my phone and email are always open to them. I'm happy to support them and truly
encourage them to do so.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
SPEAKER:
The
hon. the Member for St. John's Centre.
DINN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I, too, thank the minister for an advance of her
statement. I would also think to extend our sincere congratulations to Ms.
Coady-Davis and Ms. Appleby on their groundbreaking appointments to
Municipalities NL.
Our caucus knows the importance of having a strong
contingent of women leaders at the table. When our boardrooms, town halls and
Assemblies are truly representative of communities they serve, their decisions
are all the wiser for it. That's why we are disappointed to see that in this
year's Estimates: “… grants to equality-seeking organizations, including Women's
Centres, Regional Coordinating Committees Against Violence and Indigenous
organizations …” took a cut of $405,000.
Once again, this government does a fine job of hitting
all the right talking points but little in concrete action.
Thank you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
SPEAKER:
Further statements by ministers?
The hon. the Minister of Transportation and
Infrastructure.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh,
oh!
SPEAKER:
Order, please!
LOVELESS:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, I am very proud – along with my colleague,
the Minister of Fisheries, Forestry and Agriculture – to speak in this hon.
House today to recognize seven employees in the Department of Transportation and
Infrastructure who provided safety and assistance to our neighbours in Ontario.
Officials in our department work with our colleagues in
the Department of FFA to provide forest fire services throughout our province.
However, when there were multiple forest fires burning
in northwestern Ontario last month, seven crew members and two CL-415 water
bombers travelled to the Mainland to join firefighters in that province.
For five days, captains Scott Blue and Ian White, first
officers Sandra Curlew and Paul Carter and aircraft maintenance engineers Neil
Murphy, Robert Hebbard and Jared Walsh left their friends and family behind to
help protect lives and homes in Ontario.
As a member of the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire
Centre's Mutual Aid Resource Sharing agreement, Newfoundland and Labrador
provides additional firefighting assistance to other parts of the country when
needed. It's reassurin