Manitoba Hansard — 19 October 1964 (Sitting 14, 27th Legislature, 4th Session)

27-4-14

Manitoba — Debates (Hansard)

THE LE GISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF MA.''IITOBA 2:30 o'clock, Friday, March 5th, 1965 Opening Prayer by Madam Speaker. MADAM SPEAKER: Presenting Petitions Reading and Receiving Petitions Presenting Reports by Standing and Special Committees. 293 HON. MAITLAND B. STEINKOPF, Q. C. (Provincial Secretary) (River Heights): Madam Speaker, I beg to present the report of the Special Committee on Highway Safety and Highway Traffic Administra tion. MH. CLERK: Your Special Committee .. . MR.

STEINKOPF: MadamSpeaker, due to the length of this report, may I suggest that as it will be printed in the Votes and Proceedings and in Hansard, may we dispense with the reading. MADAM SPEAKER: Agreed? MH. GILDAS MOL GAT (Leader of the Opposition) (Ste. Rose): Madam Speaker, is it the intention to move concurrence or for the Minister to indicate when. MR. STEINKOPF: Madam Speaker, I move, seconded by the Honourable Minister of Muni cipal Affair s, that the report be received, and that we will give notice for concurrence. ried.

MADAM SPEAKER presented the motion and after a voice vote .declared the motion car- REPORT OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON HIGHWAY SAFETY AND HIGHWAY TRAFFIC ADMINISTRATION Your Special Committee of the House, appointed on Thursday, the 9th day of April, 1964, at the Second Session of the 27th Legislature, and reconstituted on Monday, the 17th day of August, 1964, at the Third Session of the 27th Legislature, to examine, investigate, inquire into, . study and report on all matters relating to highway safety and highway traffic administra tion and control, beg to submit their first Report. The Honourable Maitland B.

Steinkopf was elected chairman of the Committee, and the Committee set its quorum at five. Your Committee met on Monday, October 19, 1964; on Thurs day and Friday, November 6th and 7th, 1964; and on Thurs day, January 21, 1965, and on the 22nd day of February, 1965. Public notices appeared in the newspaper with respect to public hearings held on Novem ber 6th and 7th, 1964, for the purpose of inviting and hearing public representations with re spect to matters relating to highway safety and highway traffic administration and control. Presentations were made by the following persons or organizations: Mr. C.

Leatherdale on behalf of the Winnipeg Funeral Directors Association, Mr. G. B. Huehn on behalf of The Automotive Trades Ass ociation (Manitoba) Mr. A. B. Stovel as a private citizen. Mr. Phil'Haffner on behalt of The Winnipeg Safety Council, Mr. R.J. Montgomery, former inspector of the traffic division of the City of Winnipeg, Rev. W. Potoroka on behalf of the Alcohol Education Service (Manitoba), Dr. W. D. Penner, pathologist, Dr. Rankin Hay, Chairman of the Special Committee of the Manitoba Medical Associa tion, Mr. S. Leipsic, an insurance agent, appeared in a personal capacity, Mr. C. N. Kushner, Q.

C., Executive Director, on behalf of the Manitoba Urban Assoc iation, Mr. J. Keefe, representing the Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing of Canada Ltd. , Mr. John Mac Lean, Q. C. , Chairman of the Suspension Appeal Board, Mr. J. Galonsky, on behalf of the Manitoba Farmers Union, Mrs. Bruce Eadie, on behalf of the Dugald Branch of the Manitoba Women's Institute, Mr. R. J. Hansell, representing H. C. Paul Limited, ·Chief R. W. Alcock, Chief of Police of the Town of Tuxedo, as a law enforcement officer, Mr. W. G. Eidt, representing the Central Scientific Company of Canada Limited.

The Committee discussed at length the ten points referred to in the terms of reference of the resolution reconst,ituting the Committee and to which the Committee is to report relating to highway safety and highway traffic. With respect to these points your Committee recommends: . 1. That driver education and training at the high school level is desirable and necessary

294 1iarch 5th, 1965 on a contributory basis. In order to achieve this purpose, courses should be given after regu lar school hours, on Saturdays and during hol idays. In addition to the training course for driv ing and traffic rules , a further course on the effect that alcohol , drugs and special equipment have on safe driving, should be an integral part of the course. 2. That compulsor y mechanical inspection of motor vehicles be established in the first instance in the 1ietr opoli tan Winnipeg area.

To establish the necessary facilities an in itial cap ital grant woul d be required, but adequate fees should be set to ensure that the project would ul timately be sel f-supporting. A fee of $1 . 25 per inspection is suggested; the vehicle to be in spected every six months. 3. That the demerit system wh ile working well shoul d be given more public ity to its meth od of operation and its aims and objectives, thereby increasing its deterrent value as a means of cutting down accidents.

The technical people involved should keep abreast of the lat est de ve lopments in this field and advise of any adminis trative needs. 4. That the matter of reviewing the existing penalties for driving infractions under The Highw ay Traffic Act be held in abeyance pending the revision of the Act. 5. That reflectorized license pla tes be used for motor vehicl es. 6. That 1967 models of cars and trucks, and subsequent mode ls, be equipped with two safety seat belts in the front seats of motor vehicles. 7.

That the use of breathalyzers as a new technique, and equipment rela ted to the appre hensi on and conviction of drivers under the influence of alcohol be given further study. 8. That the establi shment of a Provincial Highway Safety Council could not be entertained unless adequate funds are provided to carry the work of the Council. That the Committee appear as a complete unit at the forthcoming annual meeting of the Canadian Highway Safety Council which will be held in Winnipeg in 1ia y of this year. 9.

That provision be made in The High way Traffic Act for adequate and uniform marking of pedestrian crosswalks in 1ianitoba, and that a campaign to educate both drivers and pedestri ans be intensified by means of the press, radio and televisi on, and the matter of enforcement be given further study at a later date. 10. That the Committee be reconstituted at the forthcoming Session of the Legisla ture to pursue its deli berations, and that study of the revision of The High way Traffic Act be added to the terms of reference of the Committee . MADAM SPEAKER: Notices of Motion Introduction of Bills HON. ROBERT G.

SMELLIE, Q. C. (Minister of Municipal Affairs) (Birtle-Russell) intro duced Bill No. 11,

an Act to amend The Lord's Day (1ianit oba) Act. MR. SMELLIE introduced Bill No. 38,

an Act to amend The 1ietropol itan Winn ipeg Act (1). MR. JAMES COWAN, Q. C. (Winnipeg Centre) introduced Bill No. 59,

an Act to amend

an Act to incorporate The Jewish Foundation of Manitoba. HON. STEWART E. MoLEAN, Q. C. (Attorney-General) (Dauphin): Madam Speaker, I move, seconded by the Minister of Education, that Madam Speaker do now leave the Chair and the House resol ve itself into a Committee to consider the resolution standing on the Order Paper in my name.

MADAM SPEAKER presented the motion and after a voice vote declared the motion car ried and the House resolved itself into a Committee to consider the p,roposed resolution stand ing in the name of the Honourable the Attorney-General , with the Honourable Member for Winni peg Cent re in the Chair. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE MR. McLEAN: Mt'. Chairman, His Honour the Administrator of the Governme nt of the Province of Manitoba having been informed of the subject matter of the proposed resolution recommends it to the House. MR.

CHAI RMAN: The resolution to be considered by the Committee is: Resol ved that it is expedient to bring in a measure to amend The Public Libraries Act by providing, among other matters, that the resident administrator of the Local Government District of Churchill may establ ish a municipal public .li brary within the local gov ernment district, as a result of which further grants may be paid from and out of the Conso lidated Fund for the purposes of the library. MR. MoLEAN: Mr.

Chairm an, mem bers will recall that last year amendments were pre sented and approved to The Public Libraries Act which wou ld allow the establ ishment of muni cipal public libraries in certai? local government districts named in that bill. This, as I •

March 5th, 1965 295 (MR. McLEAN cont'd) ... . indicated in this resolution, wi ll add the Local Governme nt Dis trict of Churchill to the list and it is for that reason that this resolution is presented at this time . MR. MOLGAT: Mr. Chairman, I wonder if the Minister could indic ate the process by wh ich the lo-:!al government district requests this. Does he act here on the basis of petitions? If other local governme nt districts want to do the same thing, will the same privileg e be given to them, and on what basis? , MR. MORRIS A. GRAY (Inkster): Mr.

Chairman, whatever the basis are, I wish to com mend high ly the government of establish ing a library in Churchill. MR. McLEAN: Mr. Chairman, in answering the question of the Honourable the Leader of the Opposition, the procedure is by way of a petition of the resident el ectors. That petition, after certain checking, is approved and it is then submitted to a vote of the resident el ectors and comes into operation if the vote is a favourable one. MR. CHAIRMAN: The Committee rise and report. Call in the Speaker.

Madam Speaker, the Committee of the Whole has adopted a certain resolution and has asked me to report the same. MR. COW AN: Madam Speaker, I move, seconded by the Honourable Member for Pembina, that the report of the committee be received. MADAM SPEAKER presented the motion and after a voice vote decla red the motion carried. IN SESSION MR. Me LEAN introduced Bill No. 57,

an Act to amend The Publi c Libraries Act. MADAM SPEAKER: Before the Orders of the Day, I would like to draw your attention to the gallery where there are some 150 Transcona Col legiate Grade 11 students under the direc tion of their teachers, Mr. Kendrick, Mr. Fiorentino, Mr. Huebert. This school is situated in the constituency of the Honou rable the Leader of the New Democratic PartY. Al so in the Speaker's Galler y, there are some 12 ladies from the Women's Institute of Hadashville. These ladies eome from the constituency of the Honourable the Member for La Verendrye.

On behalf of all mem bers of this House, I welcome you. HON. GURNEY EVANS (Minister of Industry & Commer ce) (Fort Rouge): Madam Speaker, before you proceed with the Orders of the Day, I would like to invite all members of the House to attend the Manitoba Export Corporation's Export Achievement Day at the Royal Al exandra Hotel. Letters will be distributed to the Honourable Members today -- oh, they have been dis tributed, I'm gla d to see that -- so that without then repeating the text of the letter I issue my warmest invitation to join the Corporation on that occasion.

Transportation will be provided to and from the building and we will return here in time for the session. MR. ELMAN GUTTORMSON (Ste. George): Madam Speaker, the invitation that we have just received from the Minister of Industry and Commerce conflicts with arrangements that have been made with the School Trustees to meet at all three caucuses that same day. MR. EVANS: I can only regret that the Achievement Day has been pla nned now for a con siderable period, as my friend can understand, and it will be a great regret to me that he and others will not be able to be there . MR.

GUTTORMS ON: .. ... . to his caucus as we ll. MR. DOUGLAS L. CAMPBELL (Lakeside): Madam Speaker, before the Orders of the Day are proceeded with , I would like to direct a question to the Honourable the Minister of Educa tion. I would like to ask the Honourable the Minister if he would take under advisement and inform the House at his earliest convenience as to whether the Text Book Bureau wi ll place in stock a text known as "Reading with Phonics.

" I ask him this question, Madam Speaker, be cause my information is that this text, which is considered to be very good for use in instruct ing in articulated phonics, is not available through the Text Book Bureau now, and I'm informed that a great many people are anxious to get it. MR. GRAY: Mlllam Chairman, may I direct a question to the First Minister or the Pro vincial Treasurer, whether the government has any definite commitments to the Pan American Games which are being discussed and will be held here in 1967? HON.

DUFF RO B LIN (Premier) (Wolse ley): I thank my honourable friend, Madam Speaker, for having given me notice. The government has informed the City of Winnipeg and the federal administration that it would recommend the support on the part of the province to three quarters of a million dolla rs -- $750 , 000 or matching the municipal contribution, whichever is the great er sum, so that is our commitment at the present time with respect to the Pan American Game s

296 March 5th, 1965 (MR. ROB LIN cont'd) .... and an item is in the estimates to cover this. MR. MOLGAT: Madam Speaker, a subsequent question. If the Metropol itan Government of Greater Winnipeg were to decide to make a grant, would this be considered a matching grant for municipal purposes? MR. ROBLIN : Yes, we will take the gross municipal grant. MR. MOLGAT: Madam Speaker, is the provincial commitment contingent on the federal commitme nt ? MR. ROBLIN: No, it stands on its own feet. MR.

RUSSELL PAU LLEY (Leader of the New Democratic Party) (Hadisson): Madam Speaker, in this connection I wonder if I may be permitted a question. Representations have been made , I understand, to Metro Corporation as to possible participation. I wonder if the Honourable the First Minister or the Attorney-General or the Minister of Municipal Mfairs might inform the House as to the legality of Metropolit an Corporation making a contribution to the Pan Am Games ? MR. ROB LIN: I think, Madam Speaker, we would await the action of the Metropoli tan Corporation before making any comment on that. MR.

PAU LLEY: In other words, I presume then, Madam Speaker, that there may be negotiations and discussions that may or may not be legal, and it's only after these negotiations that the government will rule. , MR. ROBLIN: I think the position is that we'll find out what they are intending to do, then we' ll know what attitude we ought to take toward it. MR. GUTTORMSON: Madam Speaker, I'd like to direct a question to the Attorney-Gene ral. I understand the government recently appointed a Dr. Nona Doupe as a police magistr ate.

Could you tell us where. this appointment has taken place or I mean what part of the province? MR. Me LEAN: What was the name ? MR. GUTTORMSON: Nona Doupe. MR. McLEAN: I am not aware of any such appointment. MR. GUTTORMSO N: ... . of the House, it says to be a police magistrate in and for the Province of Manitoba effective on and after January 29th, 1965 , Dr. Nona Doupe of Winnipeg - (Interjection) -- The Manitoba Gazette . MR. McLEAN: That's one of the folks we appoint at the request of the Department of Hea lth arrayed for the psychiatric services. MR.

GU TTORMSON:Is this the first time that a woman has been appointed a magi strate, a police magistrate ? We've had wome n judges and women J. P's but ... MR. McLEAN: I don't know whethe r it's the first time or not, Madam Speaker. HON. J. B. CARROLL (Minister of Welfare) (The Pas): Madam Speaker, before the Orders of the Day, I'd like to lay on the table of the House the Annual Report for the fiscal year 1963-64 of the Department of Welfare. MR.

EVANS: Madam Speaker, I think it was the other day when my honourable friend from Rhine land asked for copies of the table from which I was quoting concerning export rail rates, comparing those from Montreal and those from Churchill. I'd like to lay these copjes on the table. MR. M:!LEAN: Madam Speaker, before the Orders of the Day, I would like to lay on the table of the House a number of reports. The first is the report of the Comptrol ler- General set ting out the statement of assets and liab ili ties of the Liquor Control Commission for the year ended 31st of March 1964.

The second is a memorandum showing the general administrative and prosecution expenses of the Liquor Control Commission for the Liquor Law Enforcement for the fiscal year ending March 31 , 1964. The third is the. report covering the operation and enforcement of the Liquor laws in Manitoba for the calen dar year ending December 31, 1964.

The next is a "Nil" return under The Contraverted Elec tions Act for the calend ar year 1964 from the Court of Queen's Bench and the Court of Appeal , and I wish to inform the members that no rules were made by the judges under the Act; a "Nil" return under The Trade Practices Enquiry Act for the year ending 31st of December 1964; the Ann .. tal Report of Jails for,the cal endar year ending December 31 , 1964; a report of the proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Conference of Commissioners on Uniformity of Legislation in Canada for the year 1963 -- this particular report, Madam Speaker, should have been tabled la st year except for the {act that it had not been received prior to the time that that sess ion terminated; and the same report, that is. the proce'edings of the 46th meeting of the Conference of Commissioner's on Uniformity of Legis la tion in Canada for the year 19(>4.

I

March 5th, 1965 297 MH, MOLGAT : Madam Speaker, before the Orders of the Day, on Tuesday of this week I asked the Minister of Mines and Natural Resources whethe r he could indicate to me when the Pitblado -Hoskins firm had been retained by the government to act for them in the matter of the Bain esta.te. The Minister repl ied, "I'll take that question as notice". I wonder if he has an answer for me yet. HON. STERLING R. LYON, Q. C. (Minister of Mines and Natural Resources) (Fort Garry): Madam Speaker, I thank the Honourable Member for reminding me. The date, I am informed, was Aug ust 7, 1963.

ORDERS OF THE DAY MADAM SPEAKER: The proposed resolution standing in the name of the Honourabl e the Member for Brokenhead. MR E. R. SCHREYER (Brokenhead): Madam Speaker, I ask for leave to have the matter stand. M.ADAM SPEAKER: The proposed resolution standing in the name of the Honourable the Member for Inkster.

Mlii, GRAY : Madam Speaker, I beg leave to move, seconded by the Honourable Member from Seven Oaks: Resolved that this Legislative Assembly recommends to the Government of Canada that it take steps to introduce amendme nts to the laws governing dissol ution of marriage by divorce, to provide the foll owing as reasons for dissolution of a contract of marriage, any one of which may be applic able:

(1) Adul tery;

(2) Desertion for more than two years;

(3) Per sisten physical or mental cruelty;

(4) Insanity, continuous or recurrent;

(5) Imprisonment for two or more years;

(6) Legal separation for more than two years, MADAM SP EAKER presented the motion. MEt. GRAY: Madam Speaker, the resolution speaks for itself. It was debated in this House for many times, and I felt the justification of this change is so strong that it should be intro duced again . I shall be very brief in my remarks, except reading to you some supports of men in this world who have made a study of it. The library, this library and others, have much ma teri al in support of it which I am not going to read, but I have just taken out some of the most important items .

In 1886, the Parl iament of Canada enacted a Law stating that, and I quote: "To remove all doubts, all la ws of the United Kingdom after July 15, 1870 are to be regarded as being in force in the Northwest Territories unless Parl iament repeal or alter them." These Territories are Later Manitoba -the United Kingdom's divorce la w, with adultery the only admissible cause for divorce, This act has not been revised and it means, Madam Speaker, the people of Manitoba are subject to divorce laws which are 107 years old.

In that 107 years attitudes towards divorce have changed so radically that I can say with out fear of contradiction that all reli gious institutions, with probably the singl e significant ex ception of the Roman Catholic Church and its communicants, wil l accept libera lized divorce la ws . Indeed, even the Roman church is currently reviewing its stand on divorce as we have noticed in the press during the last few years. Does the state have the right to legisla te for morality'?

Does the state have the right to impose the standards of conduct, for example, of every citizen regardless of his or her faith or lack of faith? I believe the answer of these ques tions to be known,and I believe that all the honourable members, upon reflection, will agree with me. To return to the existing situation, what have our rigid divorce la ws accomplished ? Un doubtedly they have prevented a large number of divorces.

They have also, howe ver, done much to increase the cruel practice of desertion, the incidence of couples li ving apart, sep arated without the opportunity to attempt to build a proper home for their children with another mate . They have sustained and extended the practice of common law marri ages, in which chil dren who may be the product of such al li ances have no right to their father's name .

Moreover, it has not been demonstrated that unhappy marriages, which by virtue of the divorce laws have been forced to continue, provide a better home envi ronment for the children than do homes cre ated by remarriage. What sort of companionship and understanding exists in a home where the husband hates the wife; or where the wife is incurably insane, li ving in our mental institutions; or where the man is an habitual criminal of low chara cter. There are shared experiences in such homes to be sure, but few of them can be pleas ant.

Few of them can have a healthy influence on childre n, Our present divorce laws have al so forced many of our citizens into acts of collusi on and

298 Ddarch 5th, 1965 (DdR. GRAY cont'd) .... perjury in order to gain relief from a marriage which has become in tolerable for both parties. No one will ever convince me that a man or a woman bent on mee ting 'his mistress or her lover secretly will leave the doors unlocked so that detectives are able to barge in and take pictures. A divorce law authority, Ddr.

Power, has written -- and I have his book right here - "Undoubtedly there are matrimonial offenses such as actual cruelty and desertion which are often more ser ious insofar as they render life intolerable than an isola ted act of adultery is, and it offends the idea of justice that a young man and woman whose fate is to be married to a partner who has become incurably insane should be unable under the law to obtain release from that tragic reality.

" We will not allow people to obtain release from this sort of tragic reality unless they first prostitute themsel ves, make a vulg ar displa y of themselves in front of paid strangers. The whole process disgusts everyone with a concern for the dignity of man. In allowing divorce on the grounds of adultery , we have made divorce in some circumstances, a regre ttable necessity. Let us now ensure that we establi sh an idealistic set of circumstances in wh ich divorce is pos sible.

I'm definitely certain, on reading most of the material I have in front of me, that people could live happier if they had other opportunities or other reasons to start a new life. MR. T. P. HILLHOUSE, Q. C. (Se lkirk): Ddadam Speaker, in rising to support this reso lution I do so in respect of the principle embodied therein, but unfortunately I cannot support the specific grounds which the Honourable Ddember. for Inkster has. included as grounds for divorce.

I feel therefore that this resolution should be amended, and the amendme nt which I intend to move will be in conformity with the grounds for divorce that prevail in the United King dom. In supporting this resolution, Ddadam, I do so with a full knowledge that it is not going to solve or in any way assist our grave social problem of marriage break-ups. In my opinion, that is about the gravest social problem with which we are confronted today. But I do feel, Madam, that where a marriage has broken up, whe re it is beyond repair, that it is foolish to allow that marriage to persist.

I think that these people who have tried to make a go of mar riage, who have faile d, should be given an opportunity and a chance to start afresh. Divorce, Ddadam, is not what ends a marriage , it is simply the legal recognition that a marriage ha:s failed and humanly speaking is beyond repair. It is true that in Canada today adulter y is the only ground for divorce, but speaking as a lawy er, the adultery alleg ed in a divorce petition, although constituting the legal grounds for granting the divorce, is in my opinion in very few cases the actual cause of the people going to court and seeking a divorce.

In my opinion, that marriage was broken up before these people came into court. It is my opinion, Ddadam, that there are as many causes of marriage failure in this province as there are human frailti es , and I think the time has come for us to recognize these other causes of marriage failure and include them in grounds for divorce. We in Canada today, in spite of the fact that we recognize that marriages are in most in stances broken up before people come to court, we still persist in making a petitioner in a di vorce action to alleg e and prove adultery.

Now to me , I think that's absolute ly absurd, because all we are doing is forcing these people in some instances to commit

an act which is abhorrent to them or in other instances , to set up a set of circumstances from wh ich a court could legally presume that adultery had taken pla ce. I think the day has come whe n we must face up to this problem squarely and we must do some thing to bring it more in line with modern thinking.

I think that we must today, Ddadam, recognize some of the other causes which result in a marriage break-up , and I think too that we should recommend to the Government of Canada that the grounds for divorce in those pro vinces wishing to enact complementary legislation to that enacted by the Dominion of Canada should be brought into line with the grounds for divorce prevailing in the United Kingdom. For those reasons therefore, Madam, I support this resolution in principle, but I feel that it should be amended to bring the grounds for divorce in line with those prevailing in the United Kingdom.

I therefore wish to move , seconded by the Honour able Ddember for St. George , that the resolution be amended by deleting all words and figures after the word "C anada" as it appears in the second line thereof and substituting therefor the following: The dissolution of marriage may be cl aimed by either husband or wife on the grounds that the respondent:

(1) Has since the celebra tion of the ma rriage committed adultery; or

(2) Has deserted the petitioner with out cause for a period of at least three years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition; or

(3) Has since the celeb ration of the marriage treated the petitioner with cruelty; or (4)Is incurabl y of unsound mind and has been continuously under care and treatment for a

March 5th, 1965 299 (MR. HILLHOUSE cont'd) .... period of at least five years immediately preceding the presenta tion of the petition;

(5) That dissol ution of marriage be granted on the petition of a wife on the grounds that her husband has since the celebration thereof been guilty of rape, so:iomy or bestiality; and

(6) That any married person who alleges that reasonable grounds exist for sup posing that the spouse is dead may present a petition to the court to have it presumed that the said spouse is dead and to have the marriage dissolved , for such proceedings the fact that for a period of seven years or upwards the other party to the marriage has been continuously absent from the petitioner and the petitioner has no reason to believe that the other party has been liv ing within that time shall be evidence that he or she is dead until the contrary is proved. MADAM SPEAKER presented the motion. MR. R. 0.

LISSAMAN (Brandon): Madam Speaker, I would like to move , seconded by the Honourable Member for Morris, that the debate be adjourned. MADAM SPEAKER p:cesented the motion and after a voice vote decla red the motion carried. The adjourned debate on the proposed motion of the Honourable the Member for Inkster. The Honourabl e the Member for St. Matthews . MR. W. G. MARTIN (St. Matthews): Madam Speaker, I beg leave to have this matter stand. MADAM SPEAKER: The proposed resolution standing in the name of the Honourable the Leader of the Opposition. MR.

GUTTORMS ON: Madam Speaker, may I have the leave of the House to have this mat ter stand plea se. MADAM SPEAKER: The adjourned debate on the proposed motion of the Honourable the Member for St. George. The Honourable the Member for Dufferin. MR. WILLIAM H. HAMILTON (Dufferin): Madam Speaker, I beg the indulgence of the House to have this matter stand. MADA.'VI SPEAKER: The proposed resolution of the Honourable the Member for Ethelbert. MR. GUTTORMS ON: Madam Speaker, I be li eve you were going to give a ruling on that. MADAM SPEAKER: Yes.

I have considered the proposed resolution of the Honourable the Member for Ethelbert and if he wishes to proceed, he may do so. MR. GUTTOR MSON: May I have leave to have this matter stand please . MADAM SPEAKER: The proposed resolu tion standing in the name of the Honourable the Member for Emerson. MR. GUTTOR MSON: May I have this matter stand please. MADAM SPEAKER: The proposed resolution standing in the name of the Honourable the Member for Selkirk. MR. HILLHOUSE: Madam Speaker, I beg the indulgence of the House and ask that this matter be allowed to stand.

MADAM SPEAKER: The proposed resolution standing in the name of the Honourable the Leader of the New Democratic Party. I have had this resolution under consideration and you will recall that I have given my ruling with respect to this proposed resolution on March 2nd. At that time the Honourable the Leader of the New Democratic Party requested me to consider the terms "consumer credit" and "consumer affairs" as used in the proposed resolution and in the Throne Speech. After due consideration, I must inform the honourable member that my rul ing stands. MH.

PAU LLEY: Madam Speaker, it is with deep regret that I must appea l your rul ing. MADAM SPEAKER: Call in the mem bers. The question before the House is: Shall the ruli ng of the Chair be sustained? A standing vote was taken, the result being as fol lows: YEAS: Messrs. Alexande r, Baizley, Beard, Bi lton, Bjornson, Carroll, Cowan , Evans, Groves, Hamilt on, Harrison, Hutton, Jeannotte, Johnson, Klym, Lissaman, Lyon, JI,'IcDonald, McGregor, McKellar, McLean, Martin, Mills, Moeller, Roblin, Seaborn, Shewman, Sme llie, Stanes , steinkopf, Strickland, Weir, Witney and Mrs. Morrison.

NAYS: Barkman, Cam pbell, Cherniack, Desjardins, Froese, Guttormson, Harris , Hill house, Johnston, Molgat, Patrick, Paulley, Peters , Schreyer, Shoemaker, Tanchak, Viel faure and Wright. MR. CL ERK: Yeas, 34; Nays, 18. MADAM SPEAKER: I declare the motion carried. The protJosed resolution standing in the name of the Honourable the Leader of the New Democratic Party. MR. PAU LLEY: Madam Speaker, I ask permission of the House to withdraw this resolution.

300 March 5th, 1965 MR. MOLGAT: Madam Speaker, I don't rise to disagree but just to make a point because of the precedents that we sometimes establish here. It is my understanding that until a resolu tion has actually been moved by a member that he does not really need the permission of the House to do so, and I only rise so that in the future this rule be cl earl y understood. Bea uchesne certainly, I think, supports that point of view, that until the motion is actually moved by the member it' is not before the House and therefore there is no need for the permission of the House to withdraw it.

It is simpl y a question of he standing in his seat and saying he does not propose to proceed with it. MADAM SPEAKER: The adjourned debate on the proposed motion of the Honourable the Member for Lakeside. The Honourable the Leader of the New Democratic Party. MR. PAU LLEY: Madam Speaker, apparently we do have a resolution that we can debate - or I can debate this afternoon, and my remarks will not be overl y long in connection with this matter.

May I say at the outset that I am prepared to accept the contention of the former leader of the Liberal Party, the Member for Lakeside, that he did. not direct this resolut ion at myself particula r'ly, althoug h I must say on the other hand, judging by the even ts in the House this year at the special session and the last two or three sessions of this House, I could well imagine the desire of the Liberal Party to curtail the efforts of what some people call the effective opposition to the Conservatives here in this House. -- (Interjection)-- The Honourable Member for Lakesid e says,"Never", and I could suggest that such is the case, that when mem bers of my group rise to speak in critici,sm to the government we attempt to offer to them con structive criticisms based on policy.

I respectfully suggest, Madam Speaker, that more and more people are indicating to me as Leader of this group that such is the case, and I am per sonally proud to receive such comments. Howeve r, Madam Speaker, again I say that I accept what the Honourable Member for Lakeside has said in his remarks the other day insofar as this particula r resolution is con cerned. Also, Madam Speaker, because it is so obvious, I can not help but accept his conten tion, as listed in the resolution there has been establi shed by the record that wh at he says in the

preamble is correct, and I find mysel f in a position, that while I will differ in substance, I can not differ with him in the facts as he has presented them to this House.

But, Madam Speaker, I want to say to this Assembly that I too was a member of the Com mi ttee on Rules, Orders and Regulations of the Proceedings of this House that dealt with this matter among others, and in the course of the remarks the other day the Honourable Member for Lakeside acknowledged that I raised the question during the del iberations of that committee which, as he said, had my way prevailed the committee report would have contained a recom mendation similar to wh at is printed in the rule book as of today. Now, Madam Speaker, I don't know what happened.

My honourable friend in his remarks the other day said that my representations were to of no avail and the committee did not agree to my contention that the political scene in Manitoba, indeed in Canada, had developed away from the two party system in government and that recognition must be given to the third, and in some cases the fourth party or fifth as well.

But I recall , Madam Speaker, at the hearings of that co=ittee -- or deli berations should I say of that co=ittee, that after at least one of the sittings wh en I was so disgus ted, as I am so often disgusted at wh at happens in this Assem bl y and its committees because I didn •t think that right was prevailing, that I threatened to leave, and as a matter of fact did rise from my chair to le ave the co=ittee, whereupon I W:;tS cajoled or asked, wh ichever the case may be, to resume my seat with the committee which I did.

I think one of the changes that has been adopted as the result of my endeavours on that committee was the fact that we now have a time limit of 65 hours, prior to the exhaustion of which we cl ose at el even o'clock in the evening. And this was done, many may remem ber, only after a lot of bargaining on the co=ittee itsel f .

But I think it is m ost vital to consider this point in this Assem!Jly now, Madam Speaker: is the recognition of my efforts and those of the present Member for Parliament for Winnipeg North, David Orli kow, to have due recognition given to the New Democratic Party, or as we were in 1960, the CCF Party, to give due recognition to them in the Legis lative Assembly of Manitoba which had been the case since the Honourable Member for Lakeside pointed out back in the forties.

While I accept, as I say, the point raised by my friend the Member for Lakeside today, and while I read the copy of the report that was concurred in in 1960, I think that he, like I and others who were on that co=ittee, should have raised this point when the present book of Rule s, Orders and Proceedings of this Legisla ture were laid before us. I'm not attell1pting to raise this point to establi sh that the Honourabl e Mel!l ber for Lakeside is wrong, but merely to point out, I

March 5th, 1965 301 (MR. PAU LLEY cont'd) ..... Madam Speaker, that for at lea st four years, and possibly six sessions of this House, the present rule as contained within the Rule Book has guided this House. And it has establ ished, as the Honourable Member for Brokenhead interjects and says, a pre cedent. But I must confess however, that notwithstanding whether a precedent has been estab lished, Madam Speaker, it is still a written rule of this House and we must also consider the report that was brought forward from the committee in 1960 .

Another point raised by my honourable friend in his address the other day, with wh ich I concur most heartil y, Madam Speaker, is that he -- and I agree with this most sincerel y- la ys no bla me on any of the staff of this House, or indeed -- and I'm happy at the mell owness of my honourable friend in this instance after hearing him in other regards -- he does not even la y any blame whatsoever on the governmen t. So I guess the member for Lakeside and myself in this particula r instance are at one and the same because we do not la y any bl ame, Madam Speaker, on the staff of the House or on the government .

If indeed I suggest to my honourable friend from Lakeside, and he may agree with me on this, that if any blame is forthcoming as to why it is 1965 that we're dealing with this, it la ys equal ly with the Member for Lakeside and possibly with myself as well.

But,· Madam Spe aker, I think that we here have an opportunity of dealing with this situation in a different manner as that suggested by my honourable friend the Member for Lakeside, for if we we re to adopt the resolution as proposed by my honourable friend we would turn the cl ock backwards to what the rule was as contained in the little red book, which was adopted back in 195 1 if memory serves me correctly. I suggest, Madam Speaker, that we should not turn the clock back in regards to, what my honourable friend says, the li berties and protection of oppo sition groups in this House and else whe re.

And I suggest on another ang le , or another aspect of representation and rights of the oppo sition, that we of the New Democratic Party here in the Province of Manitoba and its leader, and when I speak of le ader, Madam Speaker, let me assure this House I'm not talking of Russ Paulle y, but we are being placed at the present time at a distinct disadvantage to our influence on the voter and electorate of the Province of Manitoba, in that we are not being granted any contribution from public funds to more fully serve our destiny in this province, that al l of the advantages are being awa rded to the Official Oppositk!l, the Liberal Party of Manitoba.

And wh ile I would agree, Madam Speaker, with this contention if you were only looking on the two party system in this province and Canada, that this mig ht be well and it's o. k. But, Madam Sp•3aker, we 've got in this year of 19 65 , I suggest , to look at this in a different light.

However, Madam Speaker, I only interject this to show that in our opinion, and I'm sure in the opinion of many, that we •re at a disadvantage as the third group in this House over the members of the Liberal Party, and this same disadvantage prevailed, Madam Speaker, at the time that there was only a difference of one mem ber between the New Democratic Party group and that of the official Liberal and of course I refer back prior to the el ection in 1962. I al so draw to the attention of the House that in other jurisdictions across Can ada, indeed, .

Madam Speaker, in the House of Commons at Ottawa, due recognition is given by way of assis tance to the leaders of the New Democratic Party and the two Social Credit groups as well . While I appreciate the fact that a resolution was proposed last year on this particula r subject and debated, I raise it merely to illustra te that there. are sufficient restrictions on the third party or fourth party here in the Province of Manitoba at the present time without continuing the restrictions that formerl y prevailed .

So, Madam Speaker, whe n I say to my honourable friend the member for Lakeside I appreciate and I accept the points that he raised insofar as the documents are concerned, but I . . . . him in one part of his address when he says that "he is not trying to curtail the opportunity of his friend" -- as he said it and I believe he was sincere in this -- "the Leader of the New Democratic Party," or again quoting my honourable friend, "or even the Leader of the Social Cr edit Party. " As a matter of fact, he was quite fla ttering in his remarks, I think Hansard will reveal that he said "he even enjoys listening to us.

" And I concur -- (Interjection) -- Yes it is, Madam Speaker, and I appreciate this from my honourable friend because we cross so often - (Interjection ) -- That's right and I appreciate the fact that the Honourable the Member for Lakeside is a mixed-up individual, but I forgive him for this, Madam Speaker, for if I was in his his position I think I'd be mixed up as we ll. But apart from that --but apart from: that, Madam Speaker, this was his contention and I agree with hirri; We 're agreed then on the evidence that he produced.

We're agreed that neither the officials of this House or the government interfered at all. We don't really know w hat

302 March 5th, 1965 (MR. PAU LLEY cont'd) .. . happened. We don't know why the rule is as it is at the present time only I woul d suggest that maybe I was more influential than the mem ber for Lakeside gives me credit for in the committee and that this was the impression that came out of it. But notwith standing that, Madam Speaker, we still have the record before us.

So in that there is no disagreement except, Madam Speaker, I think that there is a dis agreement as to what we should do now, and because of this difference, Madam Speaker, I want to offer to this House a different approach to the problem, if indeed it is a problem, that this House is confronted with.

Therefore, Madam Speaker, I would like to move, seconded by the Honourable Member for Inkster, that the motion be amended by deleting all the words in the last four lines thereof and adding the fol lowing: wh ereas enquiries failed to reveal how the dif ference in language and principle as be tween the report concurred in on March 26th, 1960 and the present Rule Book came about; and wh ereas this House is confident that such differences in language and principle are not the result of any intent by those responsible for producing our Rule Book so as to influence procedure in this House; and

whereas Rule 33 as at present printed in our Rule Book refle cts accepted precedents of recognition of a lea der of a recognized party; and whe reas Rule 29 of our present printed Rule Book recognizes this fact; therefore be it re solved that this House accept Rule 33 that now appears in the Rules, Orders and Forms of Pro ceeding of the Legislative Assemb ly of Manitoba. MR.

CAMPB ELL: Madam Speaker, it is not my intention to speak on this matter, I'm just rising to raise a point of order, and I would ask you at your convenience if you would consid er whether this amendment, as far as its main principle is concerned -- I recognize there is a considerable difference in verbiage -- but as far as its main principle is concerned, is any thing other than a direct negative to the ... . MR. PAU LLEY: On a point of order, Madam Speaker, I must say that I gave this matter consideration at home.

It is not the direct negative I would suggest that you consider, but that it is an alternative proposal dealing with the same matter wh ich, in my opinion on perusing Bea uchesne and other authorities, is quite in order. However, if Madam Speaker would like to take the point into consideration raised by the Honourable Member for Lakeside I think this would be proper. MR. CAMPBELL: Madam Speaker, on the point of order, I realized that likely my honour able friend had taken this matter into consideration I wasn 't asking his apionion, I was asking yours. MR.

PAU LLEY: All that I stood up for was in order to put my honourable friend straight once again, Madam Speaker. MADAM SPEAKER: I have not had time to study the resolution so I will take it under consideration. The proposed resolution standing in the name of the Honourable the Member for Portage la Prairie . MR. GORDON E. JOHNSTON (Portage la Prairie): Madam Speaker, since the Minister of Health has indicated some action is being taken in this regard, I am willing to withdraw my resolution at this time. MADAM SPEAKER: The proposed resolut ion standing in the name of the Honourable the Member for Logan. MR.

LEMUEL HARRIS (Logan): Madam Speaker, I beg to move, seconded by the Honour able Member for St. John, the fol lowing resolution:

Whereas automation has and will affect the employment opportunities of every Manitoban, now and in the future; and whe reas the prob lem is beyond the ability of any one group of society to sol ve; therefore

be it resolved that the Provincial Government give consideration to the advisability of establishing a committee com prising representatives of government, manag eme nt, labour and agricult ure to consider the effects of automation and recommend such measures whi ch will enhanc.e the moral, economic and sociological well- being of Manitoba in re lation to the effects of automation. MADAM SPEAKER presented the motion. MR. HARRIS: Madam Speaker, in speaking to this resolution, I will first quote from this book I have here, "Automation- Implica tions for the Future".

"T he capabil ities of this society and the need for ever-i ncreasing productivity engende r forces wh ich seem to undermine the foundations of the system. These explosive forces find their most telli ng manifestations in auto mation. Automation threatens to render possible the reversing of rela tionship between free time and working time on wh ich the establi shed civiliza tion rest�. The possibility of working time becoming marginal and free time becoming full time, the result would be a radical transvaluation of values .. " I

March 5th, 1965 303 (MR. HARRIS cont'd) .. .. Madam Speaker, the average worker in Canada and the USA is worried that through auto mation he will lose his job and that soon a machine will be doing his work or that his pla nt will be cl osed and replaced with a modern pla nt where machines do all or most of the work. The statistics on automation prove that his fears are justified. In Canada, between 1949 and 1959, motor vehicle production went up by 50 percent, but employment went up by only 11 percent. Household appliances production rose by 54 percent, and employment ro.3e by only 19 percent.

El ectrical apparatus and supplies , production went up by 82 percent and employment rose by only 42 percent. In all manufacturing industries be tween 1957 and 1962, production rose by 44 percent, wh ile the volume o-I employment actually dropped. It is estimated that 800, 000 jobs have vanished in Canada in the last 15 years - more than 50,000 jobs per year. The Computing and Data Processing Society of Canada, in its first complete census said there were 538 computer installa tions in Canada at the end of March 1964.

The society said 393 of the computers had been installed since January 1, 1962, replacing out-of-date computers. According; to the Federal Department of Labour, Canada had only 89 computers in January 1960, and 303 in January 1962. The Federal Department of Health in Ottawa processes three milli on Family Al lowance cheques a month in 286 man hours , where formerly it too:-: 15,000 man hours. A staff of two cl ersk is now used, instead of 120.

To provide some indication of the effect that automation will have on graduation from our high school system, we can be guided by some of the research by Lord Halesbury of Great Britain. He says that one computer equals 100 cler ks working for one year, and every $5,000 of equipment repla ces one clerk. Our chil dren are thus being deprived of jobs before they even have a chance to enter the labour force. The United States census used 50 statisticians in 1960, compared with 4, 1GO in 1950. In the field of communication, terrific strides are being taken to repl ace humans by ma chines.

The American Telep hone and Tele graph Com pany estimates that revenue from long distance calls placed by machines will be larger in 1970 than telep hone calls placed by humans . In our own province of Manitoba, after the installation of DDD, the number of long distance calls increased by 75 percent in the first few days of the new system. The Radio Corporation of America has a computer under design to take voice translation, and type it with such accuracy that it will jeopardize the jobs of one mill ion and a half secretaries.

When the Maple Leaf Milling Pla nt in Port Arthur burned down, a new ultra modern pla nt was built. Our Packinghouse Workers Union had 240 members there. before the fire. Now 72 people produce more flour than before. New automatic equipment invented in France is reported to be able to bone a whole carcass of beef in the incredibly short time of six minutes . And so it goes, with countle ss examples. The foregoing are examples of the technological changes that we can expect in the near future in our production and service industries in Canada.

This is the situation that our chil dren will have to face whe n they leave school, wh atever type of education they have had. This phase of the industrial revolution may force us to change our whole ideas of training, of educa tion and of life itself, insofar as work is concerned. It is almos t certain that we will have more time to spend on leisure, in fact, it may be that those people in our society of the past who formed the great mass of the working population, and this means most of us, may become the leisure cl ass.

One short-term answer to the problems of automation as it concerns the working force lies in coll ective bargaining in such things as shorter hours, longer vacations, an earlier re tiring age .on an adequate pension and the right to transfer when a pla nt is cl osed down. This will help soften the blow and at the same time protect the members of unions , but it will be of little comfort to the non-union workers and to the young people trying without success to get their first job.

Last year there were 200,000 new entrants in Canada into the lab our force, with 50,000 less jobs available , as was previously mentioned, and we can expect more and more job seekers each year for the next few years as the young adults of the post-war baby boom flood the labour market, with less and less jobs available. The long term answer to automation is politcal control . The advances of science belong to everyone. We should not be afraid of automation, because properly controlled it can be a blessing that could usher in a golden age such as has never before been seen by man or equalled in history.

Think of it, man freed from the burden of exchanging labour for subsistence and

304 March 5th, 1965 (MR. HARRIS cont'd) .. .. able to put all his mental, spiritual and physical capacities into re shaping a new civili zation where fear and want are unknown. Now that is the thing, Madam Speaker, we all think of it as a utopia, but it seemed to me today we talk of pensions , we talk of this and we talk of that, but are we going to be forced by this thing that is coming up on us. It reminds me of the flood of the Red River that was years ago here. The thing crept on you regard less.

There was no river or anything beside you, but this thing crept right into your home, filled your basement up and you could do nothing at all about it. So this is a thing that I would say we should go now and do something about it. Because if we don't do this then we are lost . What we should be concerned about is our government and what it is doing about automa tion. Governments must start pla nning now for the needs of the people, not for motives of profit.

We must realize also that automation will affect every member of oU:r society, not only the bl ue collar and the wh ite col lar worker will be affected by it, but also the professional people such as engineers, law yers, accountants, and the mana gerial staff, who se careers. are alre ady being threatened by the all -powerful machine that can calcula te and suppl y information at an incredible speed with amazing accuracy. As the number of automatic "Brains" increase, so will the number of human brains required decrease, regar dless of their excel lence or abilit y.

Automation has alrea dy nulli fied the beneficial effect of good working contracts and agree men ts. Although these contracts may give protection and a certain amount of security to work ers at the present time, by the time their sons and daughters are ready to take their place in the worlq of work the jobs held by their parents will have vanished. The right of unions to strike is also being vio lated by the installa tion of bigger and better machines to replace workers involved in legitimate strikes.

An example of this is the printers' strike in Toronto, where the striking workers have been out for several months and have been replaced by machines operated by women whose rate of pay has not been made public. Therefore, the worker has less redress for justified grievances on the one hand, and diminish ing opportunities for employment on the other. Al though we have not yet felt the full impact of automation, it is becoming increasingly obvious that the problem of unemployment is the major factor in this technological revolution that has yet to run its course.

What will happen to our people when it is no longer feasible to train them for jobs that no longer exist, or to retrain them on job skills that will be obsolete by the time their retraining is finished? Who will feed, clot he, and house them or us, because we will all be involved in this tremendous social upheaval. Who will buy the products of an automated society when that society can no longer exchange labour for goods and services? Who will govern and police this huge aimless society that has nothing to do, nowhe re to go and noth ing to hope for?

If we are to avoid these evils inherent in an economy automated for profit alone, we must forsake the profit motive and start planning now. Since we are all directl y involved in this el ectronic revolution called automation, repres entatives from every sphere of society will be needed to work out a formula that wi ll provide a pla ce, a program, and a part for everyone. This is a challenge we must all meet and overcome so that automation can be the salvation and not the ruination of our society. I thank you. MADAM SPEAKER: Are you ready for the question ? MR.

KEITH ALEXANDER (Robl in): Madam Speaker, I move , seconded by the Honourable Member from Rupertsla nd, that the debate be adjourned. MADAM SPEAKER presented the motion and after a voice vote decla red the motion car- ried. The proposed resolution standing in the name of the Honourable the Member for Churchill. MR. GORDON W. BEARD (Churchill): May I ask the indulgence of the House to let this stand. MADAM SPEAKER: Second reading of Bill No. 45. The Honourable the Member for St. James. MR. D. M. STANES (St. James) presented Bill No. 45,

an Act to amend

an Act to incorporate the Convalescent Hospital of Winnipeg, for second reading. · MADAM SPEAKER presented the motion. MR. :STANES: Madam SpeaKer, in short, this is changing the name from Convalescent Hospital to Convalescent Home . However, I think i woutd be remiss if I didn't give a brief ex planation t<,� the history, which is very interesting, of this very fine establ ishment run by a board of .laqies who give very generou sl y.o f their time and their efforts . I

March 5th, 1965 . 305 (MR. ST ANES cont'

d) The hospital idea has been known officiall y for a number of years was an outcome of the first wom en's organiz ation in Winnipeg which was formed in 1883. It started off as a hospital aid society and was the first. To give just a thumbnail sketch, Madam Speaker, of the work of the ladies over the years, it developed into a home wh ich they built on McDermot Avenue. At a later date in 1913 they built their present home. During the course of the history of this organization they have done many things , includ ing treating alcoholi cs, and hence the name hospital.

The situation at present is that this old house that they are using, because ot its age has very high maintenance costs, is no longer suitable; it's a fire hazard and so on; and they are in the process of rebuilding. In making their financial arrangeme nts with the CMHC it was discovered that they are known officially as a hospital , although in practical terms over many years they have been known as a Home, there fore it became necessary to have this amendment. MR.

NE LSON SHOEMAKER (G ladston e): Madam Speaker, I suppose that if the institution receives the usual grants that it will not be changed in this respect by the changing of the name, all will remain as is in this regard. MR. STANES: Madam Speaker, that is correct. It is only a change in name, an official change. In fact it has been known as a home for many years. MADAM SPEAKER put the question and after a voice vote declar ed. the motion carried. MADAM SPEAKER: The second reading of Bill No. 46. The Honourable the Member for Winnipeg Centre . MR. COWAN presented Bill No. 46,

an Act to incorporate Manitoba Museum of Man and Nature, for second reading. MADAM SPEAKER presented the motion. MR. COW AN: Madam Speaker, this is

an Act to incorporate what was formerly known and what is now known as the Manitoba Museum Association. The Manitoba Museum Associa tion is a non-incorporated organization which has been in charge of the Manitoba Museum in its very inadequate facilities in the Civic Auditorium. The association now hopes to expand its work and have a new building in the new Mani.tooa Arts Centre , and the public-spi rited men and women that be long to the organization desire to be incorporated so that they may better carry on their work in the future.

MADAM SPEAKER put the question and after a voice vote declared the motion carried. MADAM SPEAKER: The second reading of Bill No. 9. The Honourable the Member for St. James. MR. STANES presented Bill No. 9,

an Act to authorize the City of St. James to issue Ce rtain Debenture s, for second reading. MADAM SP EAKER presented the motion. MR. STANES: Madam Speak<:Jr, mem bers will recall that some of the original arrange ments between the City of St. James and Grace Hospital was that there will be a grant of the sizable sum of $980 , 000 to be given to the Salvation Army for that hospital . After that decision was made and the necessary by-laws passed by council it was put to the people, the ratepayers, who pa.ssed and sanctioned the actions of the council. Because the money was not required and has not been required until fairly recentl y, the provision of The Municipal Act,

Section 530 (b), wh ich states that the debentures must be issued within two years was overlooked. This was brought to the City of St. James attention by the Minister of Municipal Affairs and this act purel y complies with this overs ight wh ich I think in this case was excusable. lVIADA...'Vl SPEAKER put the question and after a voice vote decl ared the motion carried. MADA.. lVI SPEAKER: The second reading of Bill No. 10. The Honourable Member for Ethelbert. MR. MO LGAT in the absence of the Honourable Member for Ethelbert, presented Bill No. 10,

an Act to authorize the Rural Municipality of Mossey River and the Vil lage of Winnipeg osis to make grants to the Sisters of the Order of St. Benedict, for second reading. MADAM SPEAKER presented the motion. MR. MOLGAT: Madam Speaker, I suspected that someone would be asking for this. On behalf of my deskmate and also my neigh bouring constituency, the situation here is that the hospital in Winnipe gosis is a very old hospital.

It was established in the very earl y days of the community and served the community extremely we ll and also served a very wide area, because to the north and to the -- both north, nor theast and northwe st there are no other faciliti.es nearby and there are substantial popula tion figures in there , and settl ements like

306 March 5th, 1965 (MR. MOLGAT cont'd) ..... . Camperville and Duck Bay, as well as the other direction in the constituency of the Honourable Member for Rupertsland and the waterhead area. This is the normal lo·:)ation for these people to go to because this is really their only outlet. The hospital is now old and out-dated and it is impossible to put into it any modern facili ties to accommodate the equipment necessary or the patients, so the intention is to build a new hospital.

The bill will simply permit the two municipalities concerned to put in a mill rate in addition to what they are al lowed now, that is in. excess of the one mill allowed by The Municipal Act. This will permit them to make a larger levy. It is not intended that the municipalities will assist in the operating of the hospital . This will be done by the Order who will control and own the hospital . This is merely a capital grant. So the two mllnicipalities request this so that the construction can proceed. They have no further liabi lity there. Their only engagement is in the provision of capital for the buil ding.

MADAM SPEAKER put the question and after a voice vote declared the motion carried. MR. McLEAN: Madam Speaker, I move, seconded by the Honourable Minister of Health, that this House doth concur in the final report of the Standing Committee of the House on Pri vileges and El ections appointed to study and review the provisions of The Electi on Act with a view to making such recommendations respecting amendments thereto or improvements in the law rela ting to el ections of mem bers of the House, received by the Legis la tive Assembly of Manitoba on Tuesday, the 23rd day of February, 1965.

MADAM SPEAKER presented the motion. MR. McLEAN: Madam Speaker, members will find the full report set out in No. 2 of the Votes and Proceedings of this Legis lature that was printed for Tuesday, the 23rd of February, 1965, beginning at page 2 and continuing through to page 7. I think, Madam Speaker, that the only thing that I should say is that the committee was establ ished as the result of a resol ution of the House a year ago; that the meetings of the committee were held between sessions as indicated in the report itself; and that a thorough consideration and review of the present Elec tions Act was made

section by section; and the report contains a number of the detailed recom mendations of the committee as set out in the report. It was a careful review, I think I may say, and I am certain that many useful improvements are available wh ich of course can become effective at such time as they may be brought before this Legisla ture in the form of a Bill to :unend our present Electi ons Act.

Perhaps Madam Speaker, I might direct the membe rs attention particularly to item 33 as it appears on page 5 of the Votes and Proceedings which relates to the voting hours and to say that in this matter there was a difference of opinion in the committee a.1d I have been advised, and I think perhaps I should advise the House that some members of the committee, as it were, in whatever manner they may wish to do so, have indicated that they wish to reserve their position or their opinions with respect to this matter.

I simply direct the membe rs' at tention to the fact that there was a difference of opinion in the committee; the recommendation was the majority opinion of the committee at its meeting and there may be those who were members of the committee who would wish so at some proper occasion perhaps express some different opinion from that wh ich appears in the report itself. MR. MOLGAT: Madam Speaker, I beg' to move, seconded by the Member for Lakeside, that the debate be adjourned. MADAM SPEAKER presented the motion and after a voice vote declared the motion car- ried. I I • I

March 5th, 1965 307 MR. ROBLIN: Madam Speaker, before we move into Supply I might enquire if the Honourable Leader of the Opposition would like to proceed with ways and means because if so I would be glad to move ...... . MR. MOLGAT: · Well it wasn't my intention to proceed today. I assumed that we would follow the practice that you set last year . MR . ROBLIN: Yes, well the practice was last year that on every day I asked him if he was ready to proceed and finally one day he found he was . Is there any particular day you'd like to stipulate now? MR.

MOLGAT: Well I• m not quite sure'"at the moment,. but I• ll be prepared to give noti ce, MR. ROBLIN: Well in that case, Madam Speaker, I move, seconded by the Honourable Minister of Industry and Commerce, that Madam Speaker do now leave the Chair and the House resolve itself into a Committee to consider of the Supply to be granted to Her Majesty. MADAM SPEAKER presented the motion. MR. LAURE NT DESJARDINS (St. Boniface): Madam Speaker, before you call the vote I think that a few things should be straightened out here in this House. I think that it would be advisable to do so at this time.

So Jiar during the session we have made different statements ; we have made certain pro tests ; we •ve also made certain accusations, We have accused three Ministers of waste and mismanagement in the purchase of certain land. We •ve accused the Premier of making er roneous amd misleading statements on TV, on the radio and then repeated it in this House. We also say that the government is placing cruel taxes on the people of Manitoba. We have accus ed certain members of trying to influence you, Madam Speaker.

We •ve also stated that the Department of Labour did not properly safeguard the people of Dominion City, We also say that the wording of the Speech from the Throne made it very difficult to bring in certain things that are very vital, very important to the people of Manitoba. We also. say that they've -- ac cused them of reducing the speech debate by one day with their phony definition of the word "resume.

" We also say, Madam Speaker, that this government has been dictatorial and ar rogant, Now, because we made these accusations, because we made these statements, we in turn have been accused of certain thin gs . We are scaring civil servan ts, We are showing disrespec:t for the person of Madam Speaker. We have been accused of trying to cause panic here in Manitoba.

We•re told that we accuse by innuendoes, rumour mongering; of McCarthy ism ; of being barren of ideas; of not having any constructive criticism ; of refusing to talk about policies and discuss the record of the Roblin government during the by-election in River Heights; and finally of being members, or at least behaving like members of the Mafia. Well, Madam Speaker, today I say that this arrogant and dictatorial government is run ning scared. Mr. Roblin has pushed the panic button.

Oh, a few short years ago they laughed at this tig:ht-fisted government, former government I should say, They were pretty arrogant in their y'elling, "Why didn •t you do it then? 11 They were having a lot of fun. Madam Speaker, now this government cannot stand criticism, It is running scared and it's cowering in the corner. These would be men of action are now crying like a btinch of babies, We have not accused by innu endoes, Madam Speaker, we have come with a direct accusation. We have accused three Ministers of the Crown we have named these people.

We have accused them of mismanaging the affairs of Manitoba and wasting. the money of Manitobans. This was a direct accusation -- in fact, we've asked for the resignation of these three Ministers. Now besides crying like ba bies, what have they done? One of these Ministers didn 't even stand up -- oh excuse me, he tried to stand up; the Premier wouldn't let him . Then another one, the second one did not defend himself but he cried; he cried until he got real mad and then he cried some more. The third one, he's the dangerous one, because he•s a terrific speaker, He spoke for an hour and a half and he said nothing.

He brought in all sorts of irrelevant facts . He talked about the value of the property -- this wash •t being denied -- the value of the goose preserve. He was trying to make a point always talking about the goose preserve and this the government of priorities . I think that this is the number one on their hit parade, the goose preserve. And then he gave a description of the property and so on. This was very interesting but it had nothing to do with our accusation at all. And then he did what he had done before. I think it was -- I think he hid then behind Mr.

Archie Dewar at one time; now he hid behind the civil servants irt this department. Finally his long-awaited defence. There was the bombshell . We. had been told that he would be just about ready to resign himself after hearing this .

30 8 March 5th, 1965 (MR . DESJARDINS cont'd. ) Well, the defence was based on three points. The gove rnm ent had taken in the Federal Government and this was a big thing; it was a joke because it was a Liberal gov ernm ent. That me ant that it was all right to play with the money of the people of Manitoba, spend their money, mi smanage , but if you can get somebody else as a partner, mo re power to you. I im agine that this is what he me ant.

Then apparently the directors of the company were three people active in the Liberal party -- I understand that they are law yers and I don't know if they're the real partners, but this was another terrific thing. He had somebody else with him . This was a defence. This proved that there was no waste at all because the directors were three people active in the Liberal party. And finally, he falsely cla imed, and this was proven later, that the governm ent had no right of appeal. I Then the Prem ier, watching the clock, rose at just the opportune mom ent.

He was really going to sink this party, Well, he said that he had very little to say about defending him self, and he said very litt le. This is what he said according to the paper, the Free Press -- I'm not quoting Hansard: "Mr. Roblin said he was satisfied that the Bain property had been procured by the governm ent for a reasonable price. If the so-called goose preserve was to be sold to- I mo rrow the governm ent would make a considerable profit. " What does that me an? What does that prove? We don 't deny that at all .

It doesn't matter how mu ch it can be sold for now, the people of Manitoba are still $110, 000 short. Then this minister, the First Minister started knocking the pension plan, and he was looking at us and this was our fault. I'm not responsible . for the pension plan. I don 't know that much about it yet. Now he knocked it and knocked it but he hedged -- he was going to vote for it. He thought it was more cruel than the tax on fuel but he was going to vote for it.

Then he gave. us a big long speech, which was all ........ the speech that he should have given in front of the premier of jifferent provinces and the people representing the Federal Governm ent. This was his defence. Madam Speaker, I'd like to point out that when we have accusations against civil servants, we do this directly. We •ve accused -- I think that we, I should1nt say necessarily accusation ;we me ntion here that we thought that the sentence im posed by a ma gistrate on a lawyer that had been found guilty was not adequate. We did this; thel'e was no bones about it.

I, myself, was not satisfied with the work of the chairman of the Manitoba Hospital Comm ission -- I said so. Oh, then I was chastised by the then Minister of Health. I did not have the right to tax some body, to compla in of these people . I didn't have the right -- I say the then Minister of Health. I was told that this was cowardly, that the ministers of the Crown had the responsibility, they accepted this responsibility, and they accepted all the bla me. Well, my friend the Minister of Mines and Natural Resources doesn •t believe in this any mo re.

Now, Madam Speaker, we have been accused of showing disrespect for Madam Speaker. We know that we mu st accept your decision, Madam Speaker. Mind you, it is difficult enough at tim es to do so, especially when it seem s that we are 99 percent of the time wrong over the years, of the time that I've been here. It is very difficult for a hum an being to feel that he is wrong so often and that somebody is right so often, but neverthe less, we accept your ruling. But it is difficult enough, and if these people have as much faith and confidence in· yourself, Madam Speaker, we ask why don 't they leave you alo ne ?

Why don 't they let you make your decision·s by yourself? We al so think that you are quite capable of doing this yourself. A few days ago when I spoke, Madam Speaker, you asked me an explana tion. You asked me if I was directing any of these rem arks to you and I said no. After some discussion I asked if I could proceed and you recognized me. The Minister of Mines and Natural Resources stood up and he insisted that he knew what I me ant, and he insisted that I was wrong, that I was accusing you. And with your kind permission, Madam Speaker, I would like to read, if I may, the first para graph of that spee eh.

I quote, Page 13 8: 11 Madam Speaker, with your kind permission, I'll forget about the empty and me aningless words that man y me mbers start this debate on the Throne Speech. 11 This is clear so far. "Mind you, I do agree with my colleague from LaVerendrye that you are a very charming lady, and I respect the high office of your position, but I don 't think that you would believe me if I wished you to have a long term in this office. What I actually wish is I hope that for once maybe I'll be able to stand up here and not be called our of order.

I don 't believe, Madam Speaker, that" -- I was interrupted -- 1 11 don 1t like to start with those empty words , as I said. I don't believe that one should smile before trying to knock somebody else's block off, not mo re than I like to be patted on the back before somebody thrusts a knife between my shoulder blades. Now I do believe in this direct approach. 1 1 And then quite properly you

March 5th, 1965 309 (MR. DESJARDINS cont• d. ) ..•. wanted me to clarify this -- we didn't have the text in front of us -- and I did, and I believe to your satisfaction, because then I said, "Can I go on, Madam Spe aker? 11 11MADAM SPEAKER: The Honourable Member from St. Boniface. " But the Minister of Mines and Natural Resources knew better than anyone else. Now, Madam Speaker, earlier in the day, the First Minister had done the same thing. I want to see what is this respect.

I was trying to move a motion that we adjourn the House to discuss a matter of vital importance, that is, the statements by the First Minister we felt were not quite correct, Madam Speaker, after some dogmatic speaker. "In my opinion, '' and I1m quoting page 107, March 1, 1965 Hansard: "MADAM SPEAKER: In my opinion I believe that there is ample opportunity for discuss ion of the matter in the ordinary course of events .' ' "MR. DESJARDINS: Madam Speaker, may I ask on what occasion? " Is that any dis respect!' "MR.

ROBLIN : Madam Speaker is not obliged to answer these questions ." I guess he has to tell you what you 're not obliged to do and what you're obliged to do. Now, the First Minister, on the televis ion and then again on radio and in this House, made an erroneous and misleading statement. He definitely did, and we certainly think that he has some explanation to do -- and I1m not going to quote all the Hansard that I did before. If anybody's interested they can find it or I can let them know exactly what it was.

But the fact is that during the special ses sion, the special sessi on that we had in 1961 , the First Minister again brought a bill. He wanted to bring something that was unpopul ar. He wanted us to ratify an agreement that he had made with the great man in Ottawa at the time, the man with the vis ion, the greatest friend of the people of western Canada. That wasn •t popu lar. He wanted to raise tax. That wasn't popular. So he attached this •..••.. other rider -- this one per cent was to reduce the hospital premiums.

Well, he was asked many times -- and I'll show him on Hansard if he wants -- if this was earmarked for reduction of hospital premiums, and he answered definitely that it was. It was mentioned in the Throne Speech of that ses sion. Now, in front of an audience -- oh, he played around with the words. He tried to be correct. It is true that he had refused to put this in writing in the bill. We had known what was coming.

We knew about him, a little more about him, and I think that we didn't trust him too well on this bill, and we tried to bring in an amendment asking, well, if this is what you want to do, put it in writing, and he refused. You can see that we were right in moving this amendment. Well then he said that since 1958 the premium has been the same -- hospital premium has been the same -- "And do you know why?

There' s a reason for this, 11 he says, "and the reason is that you are getting a grant from the Government of Manitoba. 11 And he said in the House here, answering one of these questions -- I think it was my leader -- that as far as he was concerned that was never earmarked for premium reduction. But in the 1962 election, when he was on televis ion again -- he has a lot of those appearances on television -- what did he say to the people of Manitoba, lumping this big bill again, trying to mislead the people again. What did he say? 11Who voted against the reduction of premiums to the hospital? Messrs.

Moigat, Campbell and Desjardins. 11 If this isn 't a falsehood, I don't know what a falsehood is ; and if this is not misrepres entation, I don •t know what it is to misrepresent. Now yesterday, my colleague from Emerson brought in a point that was very sincere. It was an important point. He didn't try to panic the people of Manitoba, the people of Dominion City. Panic was already in. The people were coming to see him ; they were phoning him ; and he explained this . The Minister of Labour was very mad, very insulted that he should try to work for the people of his constituency. This was awful.

The same people that told us that every single member here -- we were all ombudsmen. They told us that a few years ago. Now he was insulted. Nothing was directed at him personally. It is possible it was being brought to his attention that his department wasn't doing proper work. A group of people from Dominion City were here on Wednesday. They went to see, not the Minister -- nobody was blaming the Minister -- they went to see the Department. ME:. ROBLIN: ..•.•. • rise on a point of order. This particular grievance was discussed last night.

It is not in order to raise the same grievance again on a subseq uent occasion. Our friend is out of order in raising that particular grievance now. MH. DES JARDINS: Am I out of .order, Madam Spe aker? On a point of order -- am I out of order in stating that we have been accused, he accused us of rumour mongering, this Minister yesterday. And I just want to say this, if I may, that a group came .,--this was not . mentioned yesterday -- they came to see the Minister; they weren't satisfied with the -- not

310 March 5th, 1965 (MR. DE SJARDINS cont'd) ....... the Minister, the department -- not satisfied with the depart- ment. They went to their own Member, and then when they found out that these people were going to the Member, then somebody was sent, and I' m told this was not discussed yesterday, that an inspector from the government, the government sent -- the Department of Labour sent an inspector yesterday. I don't think this is out of order at all. This rumour mongering, this is what you were accusing us.

They say that rumour mongering is when we tell them that this is misma nagement -- I think we can prove that -- waste, irresponsibility, false and mis leading statements . Is that rumour mongering, Madam Speaker? I think we can prove and we 've proved every one of these charges. Now, the Member for St. Vital also said that we were afraid; that we do not want to bring in any constructive criticism and that we did not want to debate the plans of the govern ment for the Roblin administration.

And, Madam Speaker, I would like to read at this time a letter dated September 21, 1964 from the Liberal candidate in the by-election of River Heights addressed to the Conservative candidate at the time: "Dear Mr. Steinkopf" -- and I will table all these for your information, but I would like to read it -- "Dear Mr. Steinkopf: It has come to my attention that you are waiting for a formal notice of my offer to debate with you the issues now before the electors of River Heights. Please accept my letter as such notice.

I hereby challenge you to appear with me on television or at a public meeting in order to debate the record of the government for which you are a Cabinet Minister. I have been advised that Channel 7 is prepared to provide us with one half-hour of time for this purpose. The rules for debate could, I am sure, be arranged in a manner suitable for both of us. I wish to make it clear all over that in fairness to the people of River Heights, I believe that the scope of the debate should include the record of your government over the last two years.

The record in cludes the methods of land acquisition followed by the government and includes as well the new tax legislation recently imposed, and the many other matters of vital, imm ediate concern to all citizens of Manitoba. Nonetheless, if you will not meet me on this basis, I am prepared to limit our debate to the matters connected with the Arts Centre land purchase. I trust that you will find my offer acceptable, and that you will contact me imm ediately in order that necessa ry arrangements can be made. Signed, Scott Wright. " Now the answer dated September 23, 1964. 11Dear Mr.

Wright: I have given consider ation to your proposal contained in your letter of September 21st that we should meet in public debate . As long ago as last sp ring, the leaders of your Party were offered full access to all the facts with respect to the cultural centre transaction, both by the government and the private citizens concerned. These offers they did not accept. Instead,' they preferred to make the matter the political issue that it is now and the reason for this by-election. Bona fides of those offers were established in the recent sess ion of the Legislature.

In view of this attitude of the Liberal Party, with the basic issues involved, I believe my responsibility is to present my case directly to the electors of River Heights. I find that the electors appreciate the information that I am able to give in my personal canvass of the constituency and at the various gatherings within the constituency. My camp aign committee have decided that the public interest will be best served by continuing our present camp aign of carrying the issue directly to the people . 11 I will also table this letter. Now, Mr. Wright, he also had a chance to go on television.

He had five minutes on the night of September 25, 1964. And this is what he had to say, 11I have tried to fight the election in River Heights on the total record of the Roblin government. I have sought to debate all the issues publicly. I believe that any election is a time when the action and records of the government must be placed before the people and they must be freely and openly discussed. I feel that the Roblin government has failed in this responsibility in this by-election. At the out set of the camp aign I challenged my opponent to a public debate on all the issues.

He would not debate the government record. I agreed to debate on his terms, namely, the Arts Centre question. Even this offer was refused. To say the least, my opponent's pos ition astonished me. In the first place, for an ex- Cabinet Minister in Mr . Roblin •s government to refuse to debate or defend that government's record when the record is under attack in an election cam paign, is surely a high level admissio n that what we Liberals say about the records is absolutely right. But worse, I find it impossi ble to understand how Mr.

Steinkopf can refuse to debate the Arts Centre land purchase question when he himself claims that this issue is the main contributing. factor in his resignation from the government and Legislature. The Liberals in the Legislature felt that this matter would be better considered and examined by a judicial enquiry, and I agree. Had this course been followed, all the facts and the questions involved •

March 5th, 1965 311 (MR. DESJARDINS cont1d) ....... "could have been fairly and impartially considered, In my opinion, an election campaign is not the proper forum in which to resolve a controve·rsy of this nature, but having chosen the arena, my opponent and the government should have met this question head on. Why they are now unwilling to do so and why my opponent is unwilling to defend the Roblin record, these are questions I cannot answer; but if Mr.

Steinkopf backs away from the whole Roblin record, I do not want the people of River Heights to feel that I am backing away from any issue in this campaign, "Now what about the Arts Centre question? To date no satisfactory explanation has been given to justify a profit of $137, 000 on the sale of the Arts Centre land to the government. I cannot agree with Mr. Roblin when he says that the land purchase method used by the govern ment has saved the people of Manitoba money.

This profit has been paid by the taxpayers of the province, and it is especia lly aggravating when considered in the light of the whole new series of taxes now being imposed by Mr. Roblin. Secondly, Mr. Steinkopf had, and still has, personal land interests in the area adjacent to the land recommended for the Arts Centre. In my opinion, on the face of it this represents a conflict of interest.

How can it be otherwise when a person charged with responsibility for pinpointing the exact location of the Arts Centre and then recommending the amount to be paid, which of course reflects on land values in the surrounding district, hims elf has land interest in the adjacent area? I think it is important to make it clear that because I say a conflict of interest exists I am not thereby attacking the integrity of anyone, I sincerely desire that this be understood, The point that I make is that in the operation of government our representative must bend over backwards to avoid a conflict of interest.

Good government must not only be done, it must appear to be done. At the time all this took place my opponent was not an elected member of the government but Duff Roblin was ; and more, he was the Leader of the government, arid Mr. Roblin has acknowledged that he was aware of Mr. Steinkopfls land interest in the area when he retained him. I say it was unwise, it was inexcusable for Mr. Roblin to retain Mr. Steinkopf in these circumstances, and it is upon Mr. Roblin and his government that I direct iny criticism .

It would have been simple and sensible to follow the usual practice of obtain ing the land required by expropriation, Values would have then been frozen and there would be no opportunity for the kind of controversy we are engaged in now. Why the government does not follow this long-established method is difficult to understand, What I have said this evening is some evidence of disorganization of Mr. Roblin •s present administration. 11There is much more, but I must now conclude my remarks. I have entered this by election to give you the opportunity to protest the way the government is behaving.

I ask you to vote for me on September 30th, " I would also like to table this . Now I will not read -- this is another speech -- I will not read all this ; I thi:rik that we get the general idea; but in this one the Liberal candidate is placing again some of his ideas, some of his plans, Then it was said that there was only one folder that was tabled by the Member from St. Vital.

Well there's another one that I'll table also -- says, 11Why,by voting Liberal,you can protest: against the government for imposing new taxes that are deceptive and fully prepared; against the government for its cynical attempt to bribe you with a tax rebate paid out of your own pocket; against the government for its arrogance, steam roller tactics, and pushing through ill-conceived and hastily drawn legislation at an unnecessary special session of the Legislature; against the government which, rather than reply to questions from the Opposition, choked d<abate and prorogued the House ; against the government for the unusual and improper procedures used in the acquisition of land for the Arts Centre; against the government which refused a judicial enquiry and seeks to delude the electorate into believing that this by-election can resolve the issue ; against the government which refused to stand on its own record, " And he has some pos itive points, too, 11A provincial Auditor-General to provide an independent audit of provincial government expenditures, A Glassco-type enquiry into the organization and efficiency of provincial government departments, A provincial ombudsman to protect the citizen against arbitrary government decisions.

Setting up fair, rational and con sistent land acquisition procedures. 11 Maybe I should do like the First Minister and repeat this one so it can sink in. ••Increase representation in the Legislature for the City of Winnipeg. An effective program of curriculum revision for our schools. Establishment of a commi ssi on for long range planning to meet the needs of higher education. Extension of day light·saving time to conform to other areas . 11 Now would you -- there's 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 different things . l think that this would indicate that m ay be we weren •t afraid to discuss positive things

312 March 5th, 1965 (MR.

DESJARDINS cont'd) ....... and to discuss the Roblin government record, Now we are told that we are barren of ideas ; we have no constructive criticism, Well, I only have 40 minutes; I can't read them all, I can't give them all to you, but I'd like to give you a few -- the se different motions that we brought in: Study the poss ibility to appoint agency J to handle all property purchased by governm ent; Glas sc o-type commissi on to repo rt on all 1 phases of governm ent efficiency; Department of Health to change the assi stance age of victims of the polio epidemic who accep ted home attendance care in lieu of rem aining in hospital ; construction of two additional traffic lanes from Winnipeg west to the junction of No. 1 and No. 4 highways on the way to Portage ; equalize Hydro Electric rates thr oughout Manitoba; establishment of seco nd sugar beet factory in Manitoba; principle of public aid to private schools -- this was not brought in; conduct a study on the corrosive effect of salts ; investi- gate the practice of unfair labour practice by the Department of Labour -- that is, the investigation should be done by the Departm ent of Labour; institute a program for sale of long term leas ing of Crown land ; more extensive use of TV in education ; teaching of French in Grade 1; highway safety program s included in sch ools on voluntary basis ; uniform time; establishmen t of the Department of Youth and Recreation; adequat� preca ution be taken to pre- serve original soil fertility-- that •s when there was some work done by Utilities ; study practice and program of teaching reading in elem entary grades ; more protection to public on obscene literature ; more adequate grants for construction of school rooms; comm ittee to con- sider Election Act ; too many boards and commissio ns ; perm anent Speaker; non-par tisan approach in selection of Speaker; no tax on land transfer ; no tax on heat -- we •II talk about thi s at a later time; give chance of public to voice an opinion and to discuss these taxes; this was brought in -- the government -- last year, Madam Speaker, we tried to adjourn the House I think it was to discuss th is.

We met until ll: 00 o' clock at night and then we were told at that time, 11: 00, 11: 30, that th ere would be a meeting at 9: 00 o' clock. Nobody had a chance to know, but the First Minister sa id, "I want everybody to know. " He sa id that later on in th is, .....• because somebody got wise to this and there is some people with a little bit of pull -- oh, this was fine. No, he wanted everybody to have a chance to study thi s, but the poor ordinary fellow that has to pay his tax, what can he do?

Bang, the door's closed, Then all of a sudden a bunch of res olutions died on the Order Paper and we can't bring them in I because of the wording of the Throne Speech and we are not bringing anything in, Well there is some mo re, I' m not goingto -- the re' s a lot more.

Things that are diffi cult, well no they don 1t come in, I think I remember here som ething tha t certainly wasn 1t going to help me , not politically anyway, when I said that I thought that the title of doctor should come from the University and not from this Legislature, but I don't know what they're going to do with the, I think it's the Hall Report that recomm ends exactly the same thing, Now the Provincial Secretary accused us of McC arthyi sm . I think that he has a lot of nerve, Does he think that the rest of his colleagues are all lily white ? Does he think that him self is all lily white ?

He told me-- (Interjection)-- well all right, let him listen then, He told me himself that when I was being investigated that it was stupid, my investigation, He was going to do som ething about it, I haven •t heard. I always thought that he was a friend but he seemed to want to carry this business since his re-elec tion outside the House, I tried to recognize him, to talk to him on one occasion, three occasions the same night ; he wasn't very co-ope rative but that 's his business. Maybe he thought tha t I was practicing McC arthyi sm at the time.

Now there is som ething that I wasn't going to do but I am going to do it now after being told of McC arthyis m. I was investigated not too long ago, I say I wasn't going to do it because I felt that the Attorney-General was very courteous. Mind you, he had a little game to play and this was fine, but he was courteous and he was very correct, as far as I am concerned, and I wasn't too satisfied in bringing som ething -- embarrass ing anybody; but when we are being charge d with McC arthyi sm I think it's time that I sa y som ething about that .

Early during the River Heights by-election, around the beginning of September, rumours were started that I was being investigated, After receiving a number of calls from reporters and telecasters and after being told by them that the Premier had stated that I was being investigated, I wrote an open letter to Mr.

Roblin dated October 23, 1964, protesting his lack of courtesy in not informing me of this and asking for explanations , He replied that the matter was in the hands of the Attorney-General who would soon contact me, As I say, my pattle is not with the Attorney-General on this at all, He pho ned me a few days later and asked me to meet him in liis office, which I did, At this me eting were also present Mr. Gerald S. Rutherford, Q, C. ,

March 5th, 1965 313 (MR. DESJARDINS cont•d) ....... a member of the Attorney-General's Department, and the Minister of Municipal Affairs. Mind you, I didn't !mow that they were going to be there but they were there. The Attorney-General admitted quite candidly that this investigation came about because an over-zealous supporter of the Conservative Party, which I suspected was a member of the Conservative caucus ...•... MR. McLEAN: Madam Speaker, on a point of order, I made no such statement to the Honourable Member. MR. DE SJARDINS: On a point of order, he admitted that to me personally in his office .

He said that it was caused by an over-zealous supporter of theirs that came to the government with the public accounts book and saw my name, and this is the fact. MR. McLEA N: Madam Speaker, I am not just too sure whether I should ask the member to retract the statement. I say that I did not make that statement to the Honourable Member. I informed him on the occasion in question that the matter had been drawn to my attention. MR . DESJARDINS: By an over-zealous supporter of the Conservative Party, and I don •t care if he is too sure -- it doesn •t matter a thing to me. This I heard.

And I am entitled to as mueh faith in my words as the Honourable Minister his. MR. McLEAN: Miuiam Speaker, may I just say the statement by the Honourable Member is not correct. MR. DESJARDINS: The statement is correct, and this statement was repeated to different people immediately after this . Now, these people had seen the name Desj ardins Funeral Chapel in the public accounts and thought that he might have something on me and approached the Attorney-General with his findings.

The Attorney-General told me that there seemed to be a conflict of interest because the Desj ardins Funeral Chapel had received pay ments from the government for the burial of indigents . I explained that a company, Chapels Lim ited, had bought all ass ets and name of Desj ardins Funeral Chapel in 1954, and that actually the name Desja rdins Funeral Chapel did not mean too much as all the banking, etc. was done under the name Chapels Limited. MADAM SPE AKER: Order, plea se. I would like to remind the Honourable Member that he has three minutes left. MR. DE SJARDINS: Thanks very much.

He then informed me that the declaration made by myself indicating that I was the sole owner and proprietor of the firm Desja rdins Funeral Chapel had not been cancelled and that Chapels Limited had failed to fill a declaration indica ting that they were carrying on business under the name of Desj ardins Funeral Chapel. I told them that if this was the case that that could be an oversight on the part of our solicitor who had been instructed to prepare all necessa ry pap ers.

Nevertheless, I felt that if there was blame, the blame was Chapels Limited under the Companies Act, it had nothing to do with me personally or with The Legislative Ass embly Act. He informed me that I might be wrong and that the government was ready to introduce a bill to validate my election to allow me to keep my seat in this House. You can understand, Madam Speaker, that this surprised me and shocked me. I, as well as my colleagues in the Liberal Party, had refused to vote on such a bill in the case of the Honourable Member from River Heights, and I was asked to support a bill in my own case.

I told the Attorney-General that if I felt that this was not the proper pro cedure in the Steinkopf case, it wasn't proper procedure in my case. I was then informed the Att<rney-General might have no alternative but to withhold my indemnity. I answered that this was up to him and that I did not consider myself guilty of any wrong. I then contacted my solicitor who took over the matter. Sometime in November he wrote a letter to the Attorney-General explaining his views and offered to co-operate.

In fact he included a photostatic copy of the agreement of December 31st, 1954, where Chapels Limited acquired from me the business, goodwill and exclusive rights to use the name Desj ardins Funeral Chapel . The next time I heard from the Attorney-General was on Thursday, the 11th of February, a few days before the opening of this ses sion, when he phoned me and asked me to call at his office on that day or at the latest on the following day. I phoned him back to advise him that I w wld call on him on Friday accompa nied by my solicitor.

At this meeting he handed :tne a signed letter informing me that after consideration of the facts, the office of the Attorney-General had decided to close their file on this case. I think that it would be un fair -·· I think that in all fairness I must -- I never brought this investigation. This is for something that the comp a.Ily is doing at a cost. I think it is only fair for my family, for myself and for the members of my' Party to bring this in. I think that the government was very remiss in taking all this time' tci investigate me. If I had worried, if my family had worried, it would

314 March 5th, 1965 (MR. DESJARDINS cont1d) ....... have been very difficult, but let me reassure them, I didn't worry a darn bit, my conscience was clear and I didn •t lose any sleep, And finally, we•re accused of being members of the Mafia. Well I' ve got good news for the members of the government.

They can stop shaking, Most of the boys met -- Sneaky Gramps I think was there, Punky and the Chief, all of us I think, all of the members of the Mafia, and we all agreed that although it was quite a temptation, we won't do away with any of the members of the government and although it might help a bit to have narcotics at times to deaden the blow of having to listen to them and to see them cry, we won •t start trafficking in narcotics right now. So I hope that the Cosa Nostra of the Liberal Party will not be investi gated, MADAM SPEAKER put the question and after a voice vote declared the motion carried.

MADAM SPEAKER: Would the Honourable Member from Winnipeg Centre please take the Chair. COMMITTEE OF SUPPLY MR. CHAIRMAN: Res olution, .. ,,,. MR . ROBLIN: Mr. Chairman, when we rose last night, I undertook to find out for the Member from Lakeside some facts about Hansard which I have before me, and I' ll read them so they'll appear on the record and he can be informed.

Free copies of Hansard distributed as follows : Premier 's office, five; Executive Council, six; MLA1s of the House, 70; Press Gallery, 10; Party Room s, five; Members of Parliament, Ottawa, 14; Ministers and department heads, 39; Federal Government departments, five; newspapers and radio stations , 75 ; city press and dignitaries, 31; total free copies, 260; paid copies -c ountry, 83; city, 103; total paid copies, 186, MR. MOLGAT: The Member for Lakeside, who asked about this , is out getting his copy of estim ates and will be in shortly. I'm sure he 1ll be interested in the figures.

I wonder if the Minister could explain to us -- there' s a very slight increase in supp lies, expenses, renewals and operation of recording equipm ent. Does it indicate any new equipment, or is it simp ly an increase in the costs of the normal operating? MR. ROBLIN: There's a couple of new dual recorders being obtained and a new trans criber that makes up the extra cost. MR. MOLGAT: I' d just like to say before we leave the item of Hansard, how much I think the staff should be congratulated for the work that they do.

I recall when the system was first instituted there were at times some delays in the obtaining of the Hansard copies but I find that in the past two ses sions we have the Hansards on our desk the day following the debate here in the House and I think this is a rather remarkable operation, I think the total cost of the Hansard is in line, particularly when you consider the speed and accuracy of the service. I realize that it isn't like the Ottawa system where there is some editing, There is no editing here.

It may lead to difficulties at times because I don't think that all the members read what has been said the day before to see if there are any errors but I can say that there are very few errors and I think that in this regard I would extend the complim ents to Mr. Sly who looks after the recording and the staff who do the transcribing and the typing of this . The service is very well handled and I think is performing a us eful function for the House. MR . CAMPBELL: I want to thank whatever Minister is responsible for providing the figures, I take it that these figures say 11free11 to the Premier. MR.

ROBLIN: I' ll give my honourable friend the totals if he likes, he was out of the House at the time, Total free copies, 260 ; total paid copies, 186, MR . CAMPBELL: We 1re now down below 200, I think that's a drop since last year, I don't suppose my honourable friend has the figure handy of last year, but the subscription list is on the decrease. I don't wonder very greatly when I think about it. MR. SHOEMAKER: Mr. Chairman, we're on 2, are we, other asse mbly expenditures now? Resolution 1.

I don't suppose that there is a member in this House but that has had to pay some additional income tax for last year by reason of the fact that the $600. 00 living allowance has been found to be taxable, Now, Mr.

Chairman, I should correct myself, because it would only be those members who are forced to live away from home that would be affected, that would in fact receive the $600, 00 and that probably only would affect 50 per cent of the members, But, I find that in 1964 that the federal income tax authorities went back to the time that this was first im plemented, some four or five years ago and collected the back taxes on the $600, 00, If we received it for four years, we paid income tax on $2, 400 last year , At -

March 5th, 1965 315 (MR. SHOEMAKER cont'd) ....••. least I did. I hope that I•m not the only one here that got stuck-- (Interjection)--I didn•t get away with it. I was one that didn't get away with it, Mr. Chairman. It cost me about $800 . 00 extra. Now the point is this, apparently that under federal legislation one-third of the member's indemnity is not taxable, or it's recognized that it is not taxable . But by receiving this $60 0. 00 additional money, then it is over and above our indemnity and it immediately becomes taxable.

Now my auditors took this up with the federal authorities here and spent some time with them and apparently they argued there was nothing that could be done because this was the way the Act was established many years ago for all of the provinces, that one-third of your indemnity is not taxable . This is over and above that, so it's taxable. Now, Mr. Chairman, the whole purpose of this $600. 00 is to pay the members that are obligated to live away from home for their out-of-pocket expenses.

That's the purpose of it and surely it never was the intention of the First Minister or the front benches opposite, that this should be taxable . And I wonder if there is some way of revising the wording so that if in effect we receive the forty-eight plus six that a third of that would be considered not taxable. Perhaps there's just a technical point here that can be ironed out. I don't object to paying income tax. I've always maintained that if you receive it you should be more or less happy to pay it.

But in this case the $600. 00 was intended to pay us for our out-of-pocket expenses and I hope that something might be done in this regard. MR. ROBLIN: I regret to tell my honourable friend I don't think anything can be done. This is a regulation of the federal administration over which we have no control. The only solution, of course, would be to increase the indemnity so that the indemnity would be increased and therefore the expense allowance would be compensated for in that way and I don •t believe we propose to do that at the mo ment, MR. SHOEMAKER: Mr .

Chairman, I can understand that that could hardly be done because the $600. 00 as you know, Mr. Chairman, is only payable to those members that are supposed to have an additional expense, and they certainly do have an additional expense by virtue of the fact that they're living away from home, so if you increase the indemnity of all members well then, of course, it wouldn •t take care of those members that are obligated to stay away from home. MR. CH AIRMAN: (

a) passed, (

b) passed, (

c) passed, (

d) passed, (

e) passed, Resolution No. 1 passed. Resolution No. 2, 3(

a) passed ......• MR . CAMPBELL: Mr. Chairman, I understand that the First Minister has promised us that the -- he •s not only promised us but we have received the Civil Service Report on Salaries and we 've received the numbers of employees, but there is one other thing that has been fur nished each year. I still hold to the view that it should show in the estimates themselves but inasmuch as it doesn •t then it's been the custom recently to furnish a salary

schedule for senior employees, and by senior employees I mean deputy ministers and I am not sure whether branch heads were included, and I think that has not been done yet. Can we expect that soon, and in the meantime I would like to have the salary of the Comptroller-General. MR . ROBLIN: ..• •.•. that information, Mr. Chairman, the salary of the Comptroller General is $15, 500 and I'll get the tabulation for my honourable friend. MR. CAMPBEL L: It is shown here as fifteen, five.

I presume that must be the top for that position now, the top of his range because he has been there for some time and I think that the item of the salary increase vote at the back mentions that the total annual salary increments are included in these estimates so that any place that the annual increments have accrued they will show in these. MR. ROBLIN: That is correct. MR. CHAIRMAN : 3(

a) passed, (

b) passed, Resolution No. 2 passed. Resolution 3, 4, passed. MR. CAMPBELL: Mr. Chairman, when we are on the Premier's salary, if the Premier would prefer I could defer this question until Treasury is reached. I don •t suppose it matters when it's taken up, I wanted to raise a question with regard to one of the tables in the -- following the budget speech. I refer to the table and I have the copy that was made available yesterday. I think it is the second last page that carries the table on it, actually the second last table.

We have a table there of the Manitoba's Agricultural Production and it is mentioned that these data have been revised to accord with new reporting sequenc es. And then we have the note that the difference between aggregate production and net production is an allowance made for seed and

316 March 5th, 1965 (MR, CAMPBELL cont•d) ....... feed grain used on the farm, and then we have the further note that the 1964 figures are estimates . Now all of those are clear to me but what is not clear to me, Mr. Chairman, is that if you look at the difference between the aggregate production and the net production, which is that same figure with an allowance made for seed and feed grain used on the farm , you find a great variation between the years. If my computations, subtrac tions are correct it varies all the way from $103 million per year to $38 million a year.

Now I know that there can be changes in acreage, and I know that there can be changes in price and I realize that there would likely be some variations but I wouldn •t think that either one of those would account for anything like that variation, so I was wondering what is the explanation for the very wide variation between the years.

I do not guarantee my arithmetic but as I have worked them out quickly it looks to me as they go all the way from $103 million one year down to 38 in another, of 41 in one case, 56, 55, 57 , but then we go also to 91, 99 and 90, How would there be so much variation in that feed and seed item ? MR. ROBLIN : Mr. Chairman, I will ask my colleague the Minister of Agriculture who supplies this information to be prep ared to answer it when his estimates are reached. MR. CAMPBELL: ....... if the Minister would have it now ? MR . ROBLIN: We should wait until his estimates are here. MR.

CAMPBEL L: Oh but it's my honourable friend the First Minister that supplied the document, not my honourable friend the Minister of Agriculture. MR. ROBLIN: I can •t answer it right now, I' m afraid. MR . CAMPBELL: Pardon? MR . ROBLIN: I can' t answer the question at the moment. MR. CAMPBELL: But maybe the Minister can. HON. GE ORGE HUTTON (Minister of Agriculture) (Rockwood-Iberville): ....... guess here put I would think that there's inventory, changes in inventory that are reflected here. MR. CAMPBEL L: Oh, would my honourable friend check and if it is then that should be indicated, shouldn •t it?

MR, CHAIRMAN: Res olution No. 3, passed. Res olution No. 4, 1(

a) passed, (

b) passed, 2 passed. MR. MOLGAT: Mr. Chairman, we •re working here on the basis of what? The reso- lution number on the right or the appropriation number on the left. MR. CHAIRMAN : Res olution No. 4, then we went 1(

a) and (b), passed. MR. MOLGAT: All right, so. Next is ...... . MR . CHAIRMAN: We are now on 4. Grants and Miscellaneous. Then Res olution No. 4. MR. MOLGAT: I just wondered if- - there is no item on Federal-Provincial Conference. There seems to be many more Federal-Provincial conferences on all sorts of subject rather than the major one which we normally consider as being the fiscal one. Are these now covered by departments and what about the conferences for example such as, I think, the Ministers of Finance and their deputies which the First Minister referred to the other day, how are they covered and where?

MR . ROBLIN: It has been decided that it is rather pointless to show this item here as a separate item. That is best .included -- items to covers these expenditures are included in the various departments under the supplies and other expense items. MR. CHAIRMAN: Res olution No, 4 passed. MR. MOLGAT: From now on all conferences th en will -- for example, in this case would come under Item B. MR. ROBLIN: Yes. MR. MOLGAT: Expenditures last year for the conference that was held with the Ministers of Finance would be under B. MR. ROBLIN: Yes. MR. MOLGAT: Fine. MR . CHAIRMAN: Res olution No. 4 passed.

Res olution No .. ... . MR. ROBLIN: No, ... Mr . Chairman. Under 4, Mr. Chairman, I would like to give some information here becaus e there's an increase from the. previous period and I think the various institutions concerned would like to know what proposals are being made respecting grants and l give this list to the committee. I will give the last year •s grant and the present year•s grant so they may compare them. as follows . I' ll give the name of the institution, what they got last year and what is proposed for this year. Manitoba Drama.

League, $1, 000 and $1 ,.000; Manitoba Theatre Centre, $14, 000 to $25, 000 ; The Circle Moliere, $500. 00 to $1, ·ooo; I • I

March 5th, .1965 31 7 (MR. ROBLIN cont•d)' ...•...

Manitoba Museum Association, $12 , 000 to $1 2, 000; Historic Sites Advis ory Board, $1, 000, $1 , 000 ; Winnipeg Art Gallery Association, $17 , 000 to $20, 000; Men's Musical Club of Winnipeg, $2, 000 to $2, 000; Winnipeg Symphony Orchestra Limited, $25, 000 to $25, 000; Royal Winnipeg Ballet of Canada, $17, 000 to $25, 000; Brandon Arts Councill, $3, 000 to $4, 000; Frontier College, $50 0. 00, $500. 00; Winnipeg Summer Theatre Ass ociation, $4, 000 to $5, 000 ; Manitoba Arts Council, nothing last year, $7, 500 proposed; .Manitoba and Northwestern Ontario Music and Speech Festival, nothing last year, proposed $2, 50 0. 00.

Then moving on to other types of grants -- I' ll only record a change where a change is necessary or stated. Manitoba League for the Blind, $100. 00; Last Post Fund, $250. 00; Boy Scouts Ass ociation, $2, 500 ; Girl Guide Association, $2, 000; Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, fr'om $2, 500 to $3, 000; Area Association for the Commonwealth Parliamentary people, $600 . 00; The Canadian Highway Safety Council, $1 , 20 0; Royal Canadian Humane Association, $1 00 . 00 ; Canadian Olympic Association, $3, 000. And that 's the grant

schedule for this coming year. MR. SCHREYER: Mr. Chairman, I' d like to ask the Premier if the decision as to how much is to be granted to the various organizations is based on judgment or whether there is some kind of formula that rela tes to either the number of activities or the number of players engaged or some such basis; MR.

RO BLIN: We consult with the people concerned and use a considerable degree of discr etion but this year for the first time we received a proposed distribution from the Manitoba Arts Council and while we did not agree with everything they recommended, that is the basis on which these grants are allotted and, generally speaking, I think we•re pretty close to what they suggested. MR. SCHREYER: Mr . Chairman, I wonder if I could have the indulgence to hark back to an item whi,ch seems to have passed and has t.o do with the Dominion-Provincial conferences.

The Premier tells us that the costs for these conferences are shown in the various depart ments as they are needed but there is, I take it, such a thing as a Dominion-Provincial con ference of premiers , and in ter-pro vincial premiers conference. Now I take it that if any where that would show up in this particular -- in the Executive Council, and I' m wondering is any expense incurred by the Province of Manitoba for this specific kind of conference and if so where does it show up? MR. RO BLIN: It shows up as I stated under the Item - Supplies, Expenses, simply as travelling expenses . MR. SHOEMAKER: Mr.

Chairman, the First Minister indicated that he would only mention those items where there was a change from last year but I' m wondering, the grant - I suppose that the grant for the Agriculture Museum at Austin still remains the same--( Inter jection)--,It isn •t Ullder this Item. MR. MOLGAT: Mr. Chairman, what relationship is there bet ween the grants that are made here and those made by Canada Council?

In the decis ion to make these grants, does the government take into account the decisions of Canada Council and the grants that they have made :md is there consultation between our own Arts Council here and the Canada Council ? JIJ.IR. ROBLIN : I can •t speak for the Arts Council; we take into consideration what the Canada .Council does because we receive the proposed budgets of the various groups and we are able to see what the relationship is there . There is no rule of thumb, however, that connects the two syst ems of grants.

We•ve been guided this year, as I say, by the recommen dations of the Manitoba Arts Council to a very considerable extent. All the bodies concerned are repres ented on that Council and this represents, as far as I' m aware, the consensus of their opinions. MR. SAUL CHERNIACK, Q . C. (St. John's): Mr. Chairman, the item for Manitoba Arts Council of $7, 500, could the Honourable Minister give us some idea as to the program u:ildertaken for this coming year and whether their budget includes income from other source s, and if so, the nature of the source ·and approximately the budget total ? MR.

ROBLIN: I can just give a very sketchy reply here for the reason that this sum·i s put in for notional. purpos es ; This is the one body

Document details

Collection	Manitoba — Debates (Hansard)
Citation	27-4-14
Type	hansard
Volume / chapter	27th 4th hansardpdf 14.pdf
Language	en
Format	pdf
Source	PROVINCIAL
Identifier	70d54430ad78dbea3c1dd4a2a36b1b7350ffde70

Source file is stored in the law ingest library (pdf).