British Columbia Hansard — Tuesday, September 15, 2009

H0915pm-04

British Columbia — Debates (Hansard)

First Session, 39th Parliament o FFicial rePort o F Debates of the Legis Lative a ssemb Ly (hansarD) the honourable bill bari So FF, SPeaker iSSn 0709-1281 Tuesday, September 15, 2009 Afternoon Sitting Volume 2, Number 4

Pro Vince o F britiS h colu Mbia (entered c onfederation July 20, 1871) lieutenant -Go Vernor h is h onour the h onourable Steven l. Point, obc First Session, 39th Parliament SPeaker o F the leGiS latiVe a SSeMbl Y h onourable bill barisoff eXecutiVe council Premier and President of the executive c ouncil ......................................................................................................h on.

Gordon c ampbell Minister of State for intergovernmental r elations ....................................................................................................h on. n aomi Y amamoto Deputy Premier and Minister of Finance .......................................................................................................................... h on. c olin h ansen Minister of State for the o lympics and a ctn ow b.c. ....................................................................................................... h on.

Mary Mcn eil Minister of a boriginal r elations and r econciliation .....................................................................................................h on. George a bbott Minister of a dvanced e ducation and l abour Market Development ............................................................................ h on. Moira Stilwell Minister of a griculture and l ands ...................................................................................................................................h on.

Steve Thomson a ttorney General ...................................................................................................................................................... h on. Michael de Jong, Qc Minister of c hildren and Family Development and Minister r esponsible for c hild c are ............................................h on.

Mary Polak Minister of citizens' Services and Minister r esponsible for Multiculturalism and the Public a ffairs bureau ...........h on. ben Stewart Minister of c ommunity and r ural Development ................................................................................................................h on. bill bennett Minister of e ducation and Minister r esponsible for early l earning and l iteracy ......................................h on.

Margaret MacDiarmid Minister of energy, Mines and Petroleum r esources .....................................................................................................h on. blair l ekstrom Minister of State for Mining ................................................................................................................................................h on. r andy h awes Minister of environment .......................................................................................................................................................h on. barry Penner Minister of State for c limate a ction ...........................................................................................................................................h on.

John Y ap Minister of Forests and r ange and Minister r esponsible for the integrated l and Management bureau ........................... h on.

Pat bell Minister of h ealth Services ...................................................................................................................................................h on. k evin Falcon Minister of h ealthy l iving and Sport ...................................................................................................................................... h on. ida c hong Minister of h ousing and Social Development .................................................................................................................h on. r ich c oleman Minister of l abour ................................................................................................................................................................ h on.

Murray c oell Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General .....................................................................................................................h on. k ash h eed Minister of Small business, t echnology and e conomic Development ................................................................................ h on. iain black Minister of t ourism, c ulture and the a rts ...................................................................................................................... h on. k evin k rueger Minister of t ransportation and infrastructure ...................................................................................................................h on.

Shirley bond leGiS latiVe a SSeMbl Y l eader of the official o pposition ...................................................................................................................................................c arole James Deputy Speaker .................................................................................................................................................................................... l inda r eid a ssistant Deputy Speaker .............................................................................................................................................................c laire t revena Deputy c hair, c ommittee of the Whole .......................................................................................................................................... h arry bloy c lerk of the l egislative a ssembly...................................................................................................................e.

George MacMinn, obc, Q c c lerk a ssistant ..................................................................................................................................................................................r obert Vaive c lerk a ssistant and l aw c lerk................................................................................................................................................. ian D. izard, Qc c lerk a ssistant and c lerk of c ommittees ................................................................................................................................. craig h.

James c lerk a ssistant and c ommittee c lerk .................................................................................................................................... k ate r yan-l loyd Sergeant-at-a rms .................................................................................................................................................................................

Gary l enz Director, h ansard Services ............................................................................................................................................................Jo-a nne k ern a cting l egislative l ibrarian .......................................................................................................................................................... Peter Gourlay l egislative c omptroller ....................................................................................................................................................................... Dan a rbic

alP habetical liS t o F MeMberS a bbott, h on. George (l) ........................................................................ Shuswap a ustin, r obin (nDP) ................................................................................ Skeena bains, h arry (nDP) ....................................................................Surrey-n ewton barisoff, h on. bill (l) ............................................................................Penticton barnett, Donna (l) ................................................................ c ariboo-c hilcotin bell, h on.

Pat (l) ..................................................... Prince George–Mackenzie bennett, h on. bill (l) ...................................................................k ootenay e ast black, Dawn (nDP) ................................................................n ew Westminster black, h on. iain (l) ..................................................... Port Moody–c oquitlam bloy, h arry (l) ......................................................................burnaby-l ougheed bond, h on.

Shirley (l) ...........................................Prince George–Valemount brar, Jagrup (nDP) ................................................................ Surrey-Fleetwood c adieux, Stephanie (l) ...........................................................Surrey-Panorama c ampbell, h on. Gordon (l) .........................................Vancouver–Point Grey c antelon, r on (l) ..............................................................

Parksville-Qualicum c hong, h on. ida (l) ..................................................... o ak bay–Gordon h ead c houhan, r aj (nDP) ........................................................... burnaby-e dmonds c oell, h on. Murray (l) ....................................Saanich n orth and the islands c oleman, h on. r ich (l) ...........................................

Fort l angley–a ldergrove c onroy, katrine (nDP) .............................................................. k ootenay West c oons, Gary (nDP) .........................................................................n orth c oast c orrigan, k athy (nDP) ..................................................... burnaby–Deer l ake Dalton, Marc (l) .............................................................. Maple r idge–Mission de Jong, h on.

Michael, Qc (l) .............................................. a bbotsford West Dix, a drian (nDP) ............................................................Vancouver-kingsway Donaldson, Doug (nDP) ......................................................................... Stikine e lmore, Mable (nDP) ................................................... Vancouver-kensington Falcon, h on. k evin (l) ..........................................................Surrey-c loverdale Farnworth, Mike (nDP) ............................................................

Port c oquitlam Fleming, r ob (nDP) .......................................................... Victoria–Swan l ake Foster, eric (l) .......................................................................Vernon-Monashee Fraser, Scott (nDP) ............................................................a lberni–Pacific r im Gentner, Guy (nDP) .........................................................................Delta n orth h ammell, Sue (nDP) .................................................... Surrey–Green t imbers h ansen, h on. c olin (l) ..................................................

Vancouver-Quilchena h awes, h on. r andy (l) ..................................................... a bbotsford-Mission h ayer, Dave S. (l) .................................................................... Surrey-t ynehead h eed, h on. k ash (l) ...................................................... Vancouver-Fraserview h erbert, Spencer (nDP) ..................................................Vancouver–West end h ogg, Gordon (l) ............................................................... Surrey–White r ock h organ, John (nDP) .......................................................................

Juan de Fuca h orne, Douglas (l) ..............................................c oquitlam–b urke Mountain h oward, r ob (l) .....................................................................r ichmond c entre h untington, Vicki (ind.) ..................................................................Delta South James, c arole (nDP) .........................................................Victoria–b eacon h ill k aragianis, Maurine (nDP) ........................................e squimalt–r oyal r oads k rog, l eonard (nDP) ........................................................................... n anaimo k rueger, h on. k evin (l) ..................................... k amloops–South Thompson kwan, Jenny Wai ching (nDP) ...........................

Vancouver–Mount Pleasant l ake, t erry (l) .....................................................k amloops–n orth Thompson l ali, h arry (nDP) ..........................................................................Fraser-n icola l ee, r ichard t . (l) .......................................................................burnaby n orth l ekstrom, h on. blair (l) .......................................................

Peace r iver South l es, John (l) .........................................................................................c hilliwack l etnick, n orm (l) ........................................................k elowna–l ake c ountry MacDiarmid, h on. Margaret (l) ..................................... Vancouver-Fairview Macdonald, n orm (nDP) ....................................c olumbia r iver–r evelstoke Mcintyre, Joan (l) ..................................................West Vancouver–Sea to Sky Mcn eil, h on.

Mary (l) .................................................Vancouver–False creek Mcr ae, Don (l) ............................................................................. c omox Valley Mungall, Michelle (nDP) ..........................................................n elson-creston Penner, hon. barry (l) ............................................................c hilliwack-h ope Pimm, Pat (l) ..........................................................................Peace r iver n orth Polak, h on.

Mary (l) ...............................................................................l angley Popham, l ana (nDP) ...................................................................Saanich South r alston, bruce (nDP) ................................................................

Surrey-Whalley r eid, l inda (l) .............................................................................r ichmond e ast r outley, bill (nDP) .................................................................. c owichan Valley r outley, Doug (nDP) ............................................n anaimo–n orth c owichan r ustad, John (l) ........................................................................... n echako l akes Sather, Michael (nDP) ......................................... Maple r idge–Pitt Meadows Simons, n icholas (nDP) ...................................

Powell r iver–Sunshine c oast Simpson, bob (nDP) ...................................................................c ariboo n orth Simpson, Shane (nDP) .....................................................Vancouver-hastings Slater, John (l) ..............................................................boundary-Similkameen Stewart, h on. ben (l) ........................................................... Westside-kelowna Stilwell, h on. Moira (l) ...................................................... Vancouver-l angara Sultan, r alph (l) .....................................................

West Vancouver–capilano Thomson, hon. Steve (l) ........................................................k elowna-Mission Thorne, Diane (nDP) .................................................c oquitlam-Maillardville Thornthwaite, Jane (l) .......................................... n orth Vancouver–Seymour t revena, c laire (nDP) .................................................................... n orth island van Dongen, John (l) .............................................................a bbotsford South Y amamoto, hon. n aomi (l) ................................. n orth Vancouver–l onsdale Y ap, hon.

John (l) .............................................................r ichmond-Steveston liS t o F MeMberS bY riD in G a bbotsford-Mission .............................................................h on. r andy h awes a bbotsford South .....................................................................John van Dongen a bbotsford West ...................................................... h on. Michael de Jong, Qc a lberni–Pacific r im ..........................................................................

Scott Fraser boundary-Similkameen .....................................................................John Slater burnaby–Deer l ake ................................................................... k athy c orrigan burnaby-e dmonds ......................................................................... r aj c houhan burnaby-l ougheed ............................................................................ h arry bloy burnaby n orth .............................................................................. r ichard t . l ee c ariboo-c hilcotin ........................................................................Donna barnett c ariboo n orth ................................................................................ bob Simpson c hilliwack ...............................................................................................

John l es c hilliwack-h ope ...................................................................h on. barry Penner c olumbia r iver–r evelstoke .................................................. n orm Macdonald c omox Valley.................................................................................... Don Mcr ae c oquitlam–b urke Mountain .....................................................Douglas h orne c oquitlam-Maillardville...............................................................

Diane Thorne c owichan Valley ................................................................................ bill r outley Delta n orth ......................................................................................Guy Gentner Delta South ...............................................................................Vicki h untington e squimalt–r oyal r oads .....................................................Maurine k aragianis Fort l angley–a ldergrove ...................................................h on. r ich c oleman Fraser-n icola........................................................................................ h arry l ali Juan de Fuca .....................................................................................John h organ k amloops–n orth Thompson .............................................................t erry l ake k amloops–South Thompson ............................................ h on. k evin k rueger k elowna–l ake c ountry ...............................................................n orm l etnick k elowna-Mission .............................................................. h on.

Steve Thomson k ootenay e ast .......................................................................... h on. bill bennett k ootenay West ............................................................................ k atrine c onroy l angley.......................................................................................h on. Mary Polak Maple r idge–Mission .....................................................................

Marc Dalton Maple r idge–Pitt Meadows ........................................................Michael Sather n anaimo ......................................................................................... l eonard k rog n anaimo–n orth c owichan ......................................................... Doug r outley n echako l akes ..................................................................................

John r ustad n elson-creston ........................................................................Michelle Mungall n ew Westminster ..............................................................................Dawn black n orth c oast....................................................................................... Gary c oons n orth island .................................................................................. c laire t revena n orth Vancouver–l onsdale ........................................h on. n aomi Y amamoto n orth Vancouver–Seymour .................................................

Jane Thornthwaite o ak bay–Gordon h ead ............................................................ h on. ida c hong Parksville-Qualicum ..................................................................... r on c antelon Peace r iver n orth ................................................................................

Pat Pimm Peace r iver South ...............................................................h on. blair l ekstrom Penticton................................................................................... h on. bill barisoff Port c oquitlam ..........................................................................Mike Farnworth Port Moody–c oquitlam .............................................................h on. iain black Powell r iver–Sunshine c oast ................................................. n icholas Simons Prince George–Mackenzie .............................................................h on.

Pat bell Prince George–Valemount ...................................................h on. Shirley bond r ichmond c entre ............................................................................ r ob h oward r ichmond e ast ................................................................................... l inda r eid r ichmond-Steveston .................................................................... h on. John Y ap Saanich n orth and the islands ........................................... h on.

Murray c oell Saanich South ................................................................................ l ana Popham Shuswap ...............................................................................h on. George a bbott Skeena .............................................................................................. r obin a ustin Stikine .......................................................................................

Doug Donaldson Surrey-c loverdale .................................................................h on. k evin Falcon Surrey-Fleetwood ...............................................................................Jagrup brar Surrey–Green t imbers ..................................................................Sue h ammell Surrey-n ewton ................................................................................. h arry b ains Surrey-Panorama ..................................................................Stephanie c adieux Surrey-t ynehead ...........................................................................

Dave S. h ayer Surrey-Whalley.............................................................................. bruce r alston Surrey–White r ock ....................................................................... Gordon h ogg Vancouver-Fairview ............................................. h on. Margaret MacDiarmid Vancouver–False creek ........................................................ h on.

Mary Mcn eil Vancouver-Fraserview ..............................................................h on. k ash h eed Vancouver-hastings ....................................................................Shane Simpson Vancouver-kensington .................................................................Mable e lmore Vancouver-kingsway..........................................................................a drian Dix Vancouver-l angara ............................................................. h on. Moira Stilwell Vancouver–Mount Pleasant .........................................

Jenny Wai ching kwan Vancouver–Point Grey .................................................h on.

Gordon c ampbell Vancouver-Quilchena ..........................................................h on. c olin h ansen Vancouver–West end ................................................................Spencer h erbert Vernon-Monashee ...............................................................................eric Foster Victoria–b eacon h ill .......................................................................c arole James Victoria–Swan l ake.........................................................................r ob Fleming West Vancouver–capilano ............................................................. r alph Sultan West Vancouver–Sea to Sky ........................................................

Joan Mcintyre Westside-kelowna ...................................................................h on. ben Stewart Party Standings: l iberal 49; n ew Democratic 35; independent 1

CONTENTS t uesday, September 15, 2009 a fternoon Sitting Page Routine Business t ributes ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 389 t errace and h ockeyville event h on.

G. c ampbell introductions by Members ....................................................................................................................................................... 389 t ributes ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 390 r oger St. John h on. b.

Penner introductions by Members ....................................................................................................................................................... 390 Statements (Standing order 25b) ........................................................................................................................................... 390 Joy l angan c. James international Day of Democracy r . l ee Surrey c hristmas bureau S. h ammell c hildhood cancer l. r eid r idge Meadows youth diversion program M.

Sather Fleetwood c ommunity a ssociation D. h ayer oral Questions ........................................................................................................................................................................... 392 Funding for athletes and school sports c. Jame s h on. i. c hong k. c orrigan M. Farnworth Funding for public health programs J. brar h on. i. c hong h. l ali a. Di x S. Simpson J. kwan n.

Macdonal d t abling Documents ................................................................................................................................................................... 397 Prebudget consultation paper Guarantees and indemnities authorized and issued, fiscal year ended March 31, 2009

Orders of the Day budget Debate (continued) ....................................................................................................................................................... 397 h. b ains h on. M. Stilwell r . Fleming h on. b. l ekstrom D. Thorne h on. i. c hong G. c oons h on. M. Polak r . a ustin

389 tueSD a Y , SePteMber 15, 2009 The h ouse met at 1:33 p.m. [Mr. Speaker in the chair.] Routine Business Tributes terrace anD hocke YVille e Vent Hon. G. Campbell: h on. Speaker, before i introduce two guests, i would just like to report to the h ouse on the exceptional day that i had yesterday in t errace where they were inaugurated as c anada's 2009 h ockeyville. i don't see if the member is here, but i can tell you it was amazing to see the spirit of the community. it truly is a com- munity of winners.

This is a result of a huge volunteer effort. a ll british c olumbia was made proud, and i think one of the great things was that V ancouver started the season with a 2-1 win over the islanders. So it was a very good day, and congratulations to t errace. i think the h ouse should send them all congratulations for the great job that they did. Introductions by Members Hon. G.

Campbell: i also rise to introduce Stuart Mcl aughlin, the president of Grouse Mountain and Whistler Water, and Steve Paccagnan, the president of k icking h orse Mountain r esort in Golden — two great resorts in our province that the world is going to know as they arrive to view 2010. They're going to see some of our great resort activities that we have in this prov - ince, and these two people are true leaders in the resort industry in british c olumbia. i hope the l egislature will make them welcome. [1335] L.

Popham: it is my pleasure to introduce two very special friends of mine in the h ouse today. i have visit - ing h eather Gropp — she was my campaign manager — and k im Matten, who was my voter outreach specialist. i want to thank them so much, and i'd like you all to make them feel welcome. i couldn't have done it without you. Hon. M. de Jong: Visiting us today from the state of n ew Mexico are the c lerk of the h ouse of r epresentatives, Mr.

Stephen a rias, and his wife, Victoria. it's their first visit to Victoria, their first opportunity to watch this question period and this h ouse in action. i know they will do so with interest and take whatever les- sons we are able to offer back home to n ew Mexico with them. i hope the whole h ouse will please make Stephen and Victoria welcome. J.

Brar: i am pleased to introduce and welcome four special guests, and they are t ejbir Singh k ang, one of the leading developers and a respected community member in Victoria; k irpal Singh Mangat, visiting from c handigarh — he's a retired senior executive engineer with the government of Punjab; his wife, Mrs. Surinder k aur Mangat; and his son h ardip Singh Mangat, a young businessman from Victoria. i would like to ask the h ouse to please make them feel welcome. H. Bloy: it's my pleasure today to introduce repre - sentatives of the best university in c anada — Simon Fraser u niversity.

With us in the h ouse today, we have Dr. Michael Stevenson, president; Pat h ibbitts, vice- president of finance; the executive director of the Surrey campus, Joanne c urry; and an old friend of ours, Wilf h urd, government relations officer. Would the h ouse please make them welcome. M. Sather: it gives me great pleasure to welcome the former member for c ariboo South, now c ariboo- c hilcotin, c harlie Wyse, here on the floor with us. i know that c harlie will carry on with his irrepressible nature in whatever endeavour he chooses. Will the h ouse please welcome him.

J. van Dongen: We have a large number of executives from the c anadian Society of a ssociation e xecutives visiting us today, led by Jack Davidson, the chairman. i want to express, on behalf of all members of the h ouse, our appreciation for the wonderful barbecue luncheon that they served in the rose garden at the empress. t oday is a ssociation Day in british c olumbia, so it's particularly fitting that they're here to join us, and i ask all of the h ouse to please make them very welcome. N.

Macdonald: i just want to join in welcoming Steve Paccagnan to the h ouse. k icking h orse Mountain r esort — one of the biggest employers in Golden and one of the premiere mountain resorts in british c olumbia and in c anada. Just want to make him welcome. Hon. I. Black: it's a pleasure to ask the h ouse to make welcome an old friend of this h ouse, the former member for c oquitlam-Maillardville, the mayor of c oquitlam and — more importantly — the man whose wife teaches my children. r ichard Stewart is in the h ouse, and i'd ask the h ouse to make an old friend feel most welcome. Hon. K.

Krueger: i'd like the h ouse to welcome a con- stituent of mine, brenda Dley. brenda is an avid and skilled quilter, a former school teacher in k amloops who taught at both David Thompson and Stuart Wood e lementary schools. brenda is the mother of one of our caucus's won- derful young staff members — that's Stacie Dley — and is married to Dev Dley, former Whl commissioner and,

british c olumbia Debates390 t uesday, September 15, 2009 before that, a famous plaintiff counsel in k amloops and now a Supreme c ourt judge. Would the h ouse please make my constituent brenda Dley very welcome. Tributes ro Ger St . John Hon. B. Penner: it is with very deep regret that i advise members of the l egislature of the untimely and sudden passing this morning of retired c ol. r oger St.

John. r oger served our country very well in a distin - guished and dignified way, representing the c anadian a rmed Forces overseas, participating in various peace - keeping missions on behalf of our country and in 1994 came to become the base commander of cFb c hilliwack and served until its closure in 1997. [1340] r oger remained actively involved in our community in chilliwack, active in community service, including being a past president of the r otary c lub of c hilliwack. h e cared passionately about his community but even more so for his family, particularly his daughters Michelle and Danielle and, most importantly, his wife, Joy.

Mr. Speaker, i ask that you pass on our regrets to his family at your convenience. Introductions by Members Hon. P . Bell: it's a real pleasure for me today to intro- duce a number of guests, some constituents of mine from the riding of Prince George–Mackenzie. Joining us in the gallery are brian and Denise Magrath. They're joined by their kids a lexis and c hristopher. n ow, i will say that brian is particularly known for his ability to drive golf balls an extremely long way, and they invariably land in the fairway. it's just that sometimes it's his fairway, and sometimes it's another one.

Would the h ouse please make the Magrath family very welcome. Statements (Standing Order 25B) Jo Y lan Gan C. James: t oday, on international Day of Democracy, i rise to recognize a woman who took

part in democracy in every way possible. l ast week i attended her memor- ial service with hundreds of people who packed a hall in burnaby to salute Joy l angan, who lost her battle with breast cancer on July 30. Speaker after speaker shared powerful stories of a woman that so many described as a living legend. a s a politician, an influential activist, a union leader and a powerful mentor, Joy was an agent of positive change in many different ways.

Whether it was her relentless work supporting people who needed to be heard, her ability to inspire and mobilize or her sheer conviction on the issues, Joy never settled for average. n ow, those people who knew Joy know that her physical stature was an endearing contrast to the giant she was as an activist and a leader, but those who knew Joy knew that she never let her size get in the way of a good fight. one of my favourite stories of Joy was from a communications, energy and Paperworkers strike in 1999. in an effort to block the truck from leaving a picketed plant, the 4-foot- 10-inch Joy decided famously to lay underneath its wheels, only to be promptly arrested, thrown in the back of a paddy wagon and, with great joy to Joy, driven away.

That's the kind of flair that Joy had. Those are the kinds of stories that make her unforgettable. Whether it was her work as a Member of Parliament or numer - ous achievements on behalf of the labour movement, Joy committed herself to the causes of justice and fairness. o ur province is a better place because of Joy l angan. h er passion to build a stronger, more inclusive society, her struggles and successes have built an enduring legacy. i'd ask the h ouse to please join me in remembering Joy l angan as we celebrate a life well lived. international Da Y o F DeM ocracY R.

Lee: t oday is the u nited n ations international Day of Democracy. it's a time to reflect on how fortunate we are to live in a country with a long and strong commit - ment to participatory democracy and human rights. it's also a time for us to remember the many millions of people in other countries whose governments do not respect the fundamental rights and freedoms we hold so dear.

Specifically for us as parliamentarians, it's a time to remember the hundreds of democratic leaders in these countries who still suffer arbitrary arrest, lack of due process, detention, torture and even murder. a ll of these threats have been noted by the inter-Parliamentary u nion of the human rights committee. The u nited n ations does a lot of great work to support democracies abroad.

The u nited n ations development program alone provides about $1.4 billion each year to support democratic processes. i am proud to say that many british c olumbians are involved in these efforts to help other countries reach the level of freedom and democracy which we already enjoy here. Their commitments to the promotion of democracy deserve our highest praise and remind us that we must never take democracy for granted.

That is why i am pleased that e lections b.c. is reaching out to students across b.c., inviting them to create Y out ube videos about democracy and to encourage youth participation. i am also pleased that the province has proclaimed September 15 as Democracy Day in british c olumbia. [1345]

british c olumbia Debatest uesday, September 15, 2009 391 Surre Y chri St Ma S bureau S. Hammell: Mr. Speaker, i'd like to remind you and the members of the h ouse that there are only 100 sleeps until c hristmas. n ow, while a lot of people are not thinking about c hristmas in September, off in a corner are a group of Santa's elves working around the clock preparing toys and figuring out this year's naughty and nice list. in Surrey there are over 80 volunteers gearing up for the holidays at the Surrey c hristmas bureau.

For the past 39 years the c hristmas bureau has helped families cele - brate the holidays by providing low-income and special needs families with food certificates and toy hampers. l ast year over 1,600 families and 4,500 children were able to celebrate the spirit of c hristmas thanks to the Surrey c hristmas bureau. k onch bakshi, executive director of the Surrey c hristmas bureau, told me a touching story about a mom who battled cancer over the c hristmas holidays and was in and out of hospital undergoing chemother - apy treatments.

She had no energy, and she couldn't afford to give her children the c hristmas they deserved. There was no tree, no presents and no c hristmas dinner, but days before c hristmas day there was a knock on her door. it was a volunteer from the c hristmas bureau who had a c hristmas hamper for her and her family. From the tears and hugs, you knew the joy and spirit of c hristmas had just been delivered. a s our economic instability lingers, more families will then be turning to the c hristmas bureau for help. This holiday season the Surrey c hristmas bureau is already hoping for a miracle.

They are reaching out to the com - munity to find donated warehouse space in Surrey between 8,000 and 10,000 square feet. The c hristmas bureau needs a home to make c hristmas wishes come true. They deliver more food and gifts, and they deliver the feeling of c hristmas. chilD hoo D cancer L. Reid: imagine the horror of hearing for the first time that your child has cancer. in fact, that is the diagnosis shared with approximately 150 british c olumbia families each year, and each year 20 to 30 children will die. September is pediatric cancer awareness month.

This effort to raise awareness of childhood cancers and to fund research and treatment is a cause that is very important to me. Perhaps the cure for cancer does lie with a child.

Dominic and Gloria c uccione lost their beautiful and talented son Michael. h e fought h odgkin's lymphoma twice and beat it each time before ultimately passing away at the age of 16 due to respiratory complications. k athie and t ore h atlen also experienced the debilitat- ing loss of their first-born child, a sweet little girl named h annah Dale. h annah was diagnosed at the age of four with a terminal brain tumour and passed away at the age of five. t o watch a child struggle with cancer is heartbreaking. t o see a child die from cancer stays with you forever. i am passionate about pediatric cancer awareness month.

Michael and h annah both left us far too soon, but their memories are kept alive by their families, who are dedi - cated to raising funds for a cure. Please look to the Michael c uccione Foundation at childhoodcancerresearch.org and to hannahsheroes. com. The c uccione and h atlen families are today fund - ing cancer research at b.c. c hildren's h ospital. a s Michael c uccione often said: "one person can only do so much, but together we can make a difference." riDGe MeaD o WS Youth DiVer Sion Pro Gra M M.

Sather: The r idge Meadows youth diversion pro- gram assists offenders between the ages of 12 and 17 to take responsibility for their actions, encouraging them to change course and begin leading successful lives. This program has been around for nearly 15 years and is one of the original programs of its kind in british c olumbia, providing a resource and foundation for simi- lar initiatives across the province. t o date it has received over 1,700 referrals from the rcMP and crown counsel.

With a response time of less than 72 hours upon receipt of referral, offending youth are guided through the stages of realization, responsibility and account - ability.

Very quickly youth are taught the impact of their actions on their victims, the community, their family and themselves. t imely intervention between the young offender's action and understanding the consequences of that action has been very useful in reducing recidivism. [1350] a community accountability panel comprised of rotat- ing volunteers meets with the young offender to provide extrajudicial guidance, directing them to drug and alcohol detoxification and counselling, employment opportunities, family counselling, education and housing. in addition, volunteer mentorship, family group conferencing, a per- sonal achievement program and the real program have all led to the ridge Meadows youth diversion program's high success rate.

The program enjoys wide support in Maple r idge and Pitt Meadows. The services provided by r idge Meadows youth diversion empower youth by addressing the under- lying circumstances leading to the offending behaviour. in these days of increasing gang violence in our province, we are fortunate to have programs like the r idge Meadows youth diversion program to help youth find their way out of the revolving door of crime. This valuable program is in desperate need of funding and will close its doors in o ctober unless government assistance is forthcoming.

british c olumbia Debates392 t uesday, September 15, 2009 Fleet Woo D co MMunit Y aSSoci ation D. Hayer: l ike my friend across the way, i also attended the 11th annual Fleetwood Festival on Saturday, just as i have attended every year since i was first elected in 2001.

This wonderful celebration of family and community was put on by the Fleetwood c ommunity a ssociation and attracted thousands of residents from throughout the area. u ntil boundaries were realigned for the May 12 election, all the Fleetwood area was part of my Surrey- t ynehead riding. n ortheast Fleetwood is still part of my riding. i have assured everyone in Fleetwood that should they need any assistance or have concerns, they are still more than welcome to come to me for any help. i also want to commend the Fleetwood c ommunity a ssociation led by the president, r ick h art; the vice- president, Joanne a nderson; treasurer Joanne Perrier; secretary Joy h art; director c arol a dams, and Deb h ughes who, along with dozens of volunteers and city staff, do outstanding work in the community fair to help people of all ages and all ethnic backgrounds. but the Fleetwood community does a lot more than just organize an annual festival. u nder the guidance of Mildred Davies, interim chair of the Fleetwood-Surrey planning committee, and assisted by secretary Gay c alestagne, treasurer bonnie Wright and many other volunteers, they also work on many other events, includ- ing the Surrey seniors dinner every three months for the Fleetwood seniors.

This is organized by the Fleetwood seniors planning committee, and they host a dinner every year. These wonderful social gatherings bring together seniors from Fleetwood, Guildford, Port k ells, Fraser h eights, t ynehead, c loverdale, newton and Whalley. i ask all the members in the h ouse to join me in congratulating members, executive and directors of the Fleetwood c ommunity a ssociation, the Fleetwood seniors planning committee and all the volunteers and sponsors for this year's festival, as well as for all the com- munity work they do throughout the year.

Oral Questions FunD in G For athleteS anD School SPort S C. James: This past February Vanoc held the 2010 o lympic countdown party. t wo days before the party Vanoc asked the government to pay for the event. Just a week later the government sent written confirmation that it was providing half a million dollars to V anoc for the party. n ow here we are six months later. The government has turned around and announced cuts to schools, to sports and to kids' programs. My question is to the Minister of h ealthy l iving and Sport.

Why was the l iberal government so quick to find the funds for the Vanoc party, and yet it can't find the money for kids' sports? Hon. I. Chong: it's pretty obvious that the l eader of the o pposition is still opposed to the o lympics to this very day. Sport is important to this government.

We are living in very challenging economic times. o ur government has made decisions, difficult decisions, and we know that those are also difficult for a number of sports organizations. it would be nice to do more, but in spite of these dif - ficult times, we are still spending $38 million to support sports throughout the province. So $38 million to support sports organizations. That means there will still be sports. There'll be games. There'll be tournaments. There'll be championships.

These will be delivered throughout the province, and our young athletes will have an opportun- ity to compete to do their very personal best. [1355] Mr. Speaker: The l eader of the o pposition has a supplemental. C. James: in these difficult economic times, the l iberal government found $500,000 — half a million dollars — to subsidize an o lympic party instead of providing funding for kids' sports. That's the choice that this government made. That's the choice that this government made. The people of british c olumbia want a legacy for chil- dren from the o lympics.

They expect that the resources will be there to support children who see themselves as future athletes in the o lympics. They want a legacy of success for our young athletes and our children, and this government is doing just the opposite. So again to the minister: how can she justify paying for an o lympic party when b.c. kids are losing oppor - tunities for success? Hon. I. Chong: i cannot believe that still to this very day, the opposition leader is opposing the o lympics — this very day. if it was up to the n DP , it wouldn't even be happening.

We wouldn't even have the o lympics if it was up to the nDP , because they have voted against every…. interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. c ontinue, Minister. Hon. I. Chong: e very opportunity that they have had to support the o lympics, they have not. it's shown time and time again. l et me talk about the legacy that the opposition is talking about. The legacy also includes sports infra - structure — $600 million in sports infrastructure. These

british c olumbia Debatest uesday, September 15, 2009 393 are where our young athletes are able to train, to develop, to go on to other levels of competition — whether they be other provincial competitions, other national or cer - tainly international. i wonder if the leader has been to the r ichmond oval lately and seen the kind of training that is going on there. Mr. Speaker: The l eader of the o pposition has a fur- ther supplemental. interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. The l eader of the o pposition has a further supple - mental. C.

James: i'd suggest the minister spend a little bit of time at a school basketball game or a soccer game or a l ittle l eague game in the summer to see where the money that this government is cutting goes, to provide support for those children. The choice this government made is very clear. This minister and the rest of this government feel that it's right to spend $500,000 on a private party, to subsid - ize the Vanoc party, rather than spending money sup - porting children and sports.

These are cuts that strike at the heart of what the o lympics is about. a gain, to the minister. h alf a million dollars on an o lympic party to showcase the Premier. o ver a million dollars for three ministers' offices and $130,000 in cuts for programs for kids. i'd like to ask this minister: how many ministers is it going to take before this govern - ment gets its priorities right? Hon. I. Chong: in case the opposition leader wasn't aware, in the last fiscal the 2010 countdown actually ran a surplus that was available to them.

Well, the additional dollars allow them to continue to invest in our youth, continue to invest in sports. but again, i have to say…. interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. c ontinue, Minister. Hon. I. Chong: i have met with the b.c. School Sports association representatives, and our ministry has offered to work with them to find savings, because we are all in difficult, challenging financial times. but i want to be clear. The opposition is suggesting that sports in schools are at an end, and that is not the case. That is absolutely false.

Sports will continue in our schools, because we have a sports sector that works with our youth in our schools to allow them to compete and do the very west they can. [1400] K. Corrigan: Well, the Minister of h ealthy l iving and Sport asked if we'd been out to the r ichmond oval lately, and i know that none of us were invited to the party at the r ichmond oval on that day, and nobody that we know was there. interjections. Mr. Speaker: Member. Member, just take your seat. interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. Members. c ontinue, Member. K. Corrigan: Mr.

Speaker, $500,000 spent to shine the o lympic spotlight on the Premier and his friends while b.c.'s kids get hit with more cuts and fewer ser- vices — that's this government's priorities, and that's this government's record. a gain to the minister: how can she explain cutting $130,000 of funding for young athletes while spend - ing half a million dollars on an invitation-only party to showcase the Premier? Hon. I. Chong: i'd like to ask that member how she can explain to her constituents why she continues to oppose the o lympics. The o lympics… interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. Members. c ontinue, Minister.

Hon. I. Chong: …are providing jobs right now. The o lympics are providing jobs when we need them. if the members opposite were to consider what that can do to build the spirit and pride in our communities, what the o lympics are doing today and will do in the future when we have three billion pairs of eyes looking at our won - derful province, where we see investments in infrastruc- ture that has been built for our young athletes where they are now training because they want to be able to deliver a gold medal at a first c anada o lympics in their own host province…. Mr. Speaker: Member has a supplemental. K.

Corrigan: Well, i certainly don't oppose amateur sport or sport at all. one of the most proud moments of my life was when i represented the province of british c olumbia at the c anada Winter Games in 1972, and i was very proud to have won a bronze medal. This government's actions say it all. They cut the very programs our kids need to succeed in sports and to live

british c olumbia Debates394 t uesday, September 15, 2009 a healthy lifestyle. but they have no issues with forcing taxpayers to subsidize a private o lympic party. a gain to the minister: will she admit it was wrong to waste taxpayer dollars on the Premier's o lympic party, and will the minister commit today to reinstate that much-needed funding? Hon. I. Chong: i want to be perfectly clear. Sports, games, championships, tournaments — they're all con - tinuing in british c olumbia schools this year. They have not been eliminated. For the nDP to suggest that they have been eliminated is just irresponsible. M.

Farnworth: V anoc needs $500,000 — one minister, one cheque, done right away. b.c . school sports need ministers to speak up for kids' sports across this province, and we have three ministers, and they failed to speak up for school sports across this province. but, you know, all it would take is one Premier — that Premier — to stand up and admit that his ministers failed, that his government has been inept on this issue, and to restore that funding. [1405] So will the Premier have the courage to stand up and restore the funding to b.c. school sports across the province today? Hon. I.

Chong: a s i've said, $38 million is being invested for sports this year, and you know, a part of that also includes hundreds of thousands of dollars that we have provided to k idSport, a program that helps with registration fees for low-income families. FunD in G For Public health Pro GraMS J. Brar: This minister has also cut 42 percent of fund- ing to the population and public health branch of the Ministry of h ealthy l iving and Sport. This branch over- sees programs key to protecting the public of british c olumbia from illness and keeping the people out of hospitals.

My question is very simple. h ow can the minister jus- tify to the people of british c olumbia these massive 42 percent funding cuts to protecting public health? Hon. I. Chong: Public safety and public health are a high priority for this government, which is one of the reasons why we have protected those critical services for public health and population health. a s this chamber should know, when we tabled our budget in February of this year, all ministries were to look for savings in areas of administration, of office and business and of travel. That's what we've done. Mr. Speaker: Member has a supplemental. J.

Brar: Mr. Speaker, 42 percent cuts to this very import- ant ministry is a high priority for this minister. That's shame to the minister for standing up in this h ouse and saying that. in recent weeks we have seen this government not being upfront about funding cuts with agencies that are delivering key programs to the people of british columbia. This was fully on display yesterday. t oday again, the minis- ter is not giving us the straight answers. My question is very simple again.

Will the minister finally disclose the list of specific programs and commun- ity agencies that will receive less or no funding to deliver programs that keep the people of british c olumbia healthy and protect them from being sick? Hon. I. Chong: Well, in case the member has missed it, this province has been noted for its leadership in healthy living and healthy lifestyles. We have the healthi- est population. i'm proud to say that we have the health- iest population. british c olumbians are the healthiest in all of c anada. interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. H.

Lali: The only thing that this government has shown leadership in is making massive cuts to services all across british c olumbia. Susan r oline, who is the mayor of Merritt, has been voicing her concerns that the l iberal government's cuts may actually put drinking water at risk, particularly in small and rural communities like Merritt. Will the minister please come clean and tell this h ouse how the l iberal government's reckless cutbacks will impact public health? Hon. I.

Chong: i'm surprised that that member would spread irresponsible information such as that when this province has very strong drinking water regulations and protections. it was our government…. i recall, as a previous minister, that we provided an $80 million pro - gram, a community water improvement program that provided for safer drinking water protection. [1410] Those were additional dollars, where this government funded those projects to the tune of two-thirds of those projects. a nd you know what the nDP did? They voted against it. interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. The member has a supplemental. H.

Lali: i cannot believe that the minister would stand up in this h ouse and disparage the reputation of one of the finest mayors in the province of british c olumbia.

british c olumbia Debatest uesday, September 15, 2009 395 interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. H. Lali: Mayors across british c olumbia and regional district reps and the people of british c olumbia cannot afford to learn about this l iberal government's reckless cutbacks that compromise the health and the safety of the people. They want answers — not ambiguity, not denials, not stonewalling. a gain, my question is to the Minister of h ealthy l iving and Sport. Will the minister table in this h ouse which programs that protect the public's health and safety are being cut back by this l iberal government?

Will the minister stand up and do that today and make the com- mitment to table those cuts that she's going to make in terms of the safety of the people of british c olumbia? Hon. I.

Chong: c ertainly, the safety of the popula - tion of british c olumbia is important, which is one of the reasons why we have programs to protect drinking water, which is why we have programs that have helped communities throughout the province to upgrade their systems, to improve their systems. i recall having gone to a community where they had been on a boil-water advisory for 20 years. it was our govern- ment, our program that provided them with a new system that would allow them to take off boil-water advisories. A.

Dix: The Minister of h ealthy l iving said that the government put its thinking cap on after February and that they were looking for cuts. They were looking for cuts, and what'd they do? They doubled the size of the minister's office. They got two ministers and twice as much money, half a million dollars more. They increased — get this — executive and support services by 5 percent, and they cut programs to protect the population and public health by 42.9 percent. it's a simple question for the minister. Y ou know, it's the most basic question you can ask. What does the 42.9 percent count for?

What did they cut in her budget? Hon. I. Chong: a s i've indicated, the savings that we have found throughout our ministries, throughout govern- ment have been in the area of discretionary spending, have been in public service travel, have been in business and office expenses. W e have made those decisions because we are in difficult and challenging financial times. We want to protect our core services — our health care services, our education budget, our vital social ser - vices. We're doing that. The nDP would not. Mr. Speaker: The member has a supplemental. A.

Dix: in this h ouse yesterday the minister tried to pass off a 30 percent cut in programming as good news for amateur sport in british c olumbia. That's what she tried to do. So can she explain — it's a simple ques - tion, because she might have been informed about what the budget was on budget day, at least — what the 42.9 percent cut in that critical part of her ministry amounts to?

She knows, i guess, because the other minister is sit - ting beside her, that they doubled the number of dollars for ministers, that they doubled the number of dollars for staff in their offices, that they increased executive and administration by 5 percent. c an she just tell us…? it's a simple question, the most simple a minister can get. She's cutting spending on the protection of public health by 42 percent. What is she doing? Hon. I. Chong: Well, i've advised that member that what we've done is found administrative savings throughout our ministry, throughout our government.

So my question to that member…. [1415] interjections. Mr. Speaker: Minister, just take your seat. Members. c ontinue, Minister. Hon. I. Chong: Faced with these challenging eco - nomic times, we have ensured our protection of health care and education and vital social services. We've found savings in administration. My question to the member opposite is this. They were going to ask for another $1.2 billion of cuts. Where were they going to make those cuts? S.

Simpson: if the Premier wanted to save on some unnecessary expenditures, maybe he could start with the money that he's wasting on this minister's office and the minister of state. Mr. Speaker, a 42.9 percent cut. Simple question. n ame the expenditures that you saved this money on. What did the minister cut? Hon. I. Chong: i've stated for the members opposite a number of times that what this ministry and what the entire government have done is found savings administra- tively — business and office expenses, contract services… interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. c ontinue, Minister. Hon. I.

Chong: …in discretionary spending and cer - tainly in public servant travel. We've made sure that the dollars needed to protect our health care budget, our

british c olumbia Debates396 t uesday, September 15, 2009 education budget, our vital social services are protected, and they are. in fact, they're getting increases. Mr. Speaker: The member has a supplemental. S. Simpson: We're talking about $20 million in cuts. is the minister trying to tell us that there's $20 million of administration and fat in her ministry that she cut, or is the minister finally going to tell us what that $20 million cut entailed? What was cut? What were the real programs and real services that this minister cut? Hon. I.

Chong: For that member to suggest that direct services, vital services to protect health and the public safety of the population of british c olumbia…. it's irresponsible. We have ensured the protection of our health care services, our education budget, our vital social services — savings that we have made in this ministry and across government. We have been very clear about that. We've been saying that administrative savings have been found. Discretionary spending has also had to make reductions as well as business and office expenses.

We will continue to have fiscal prudence going forward so that we can come out of this recession stronger — stronger than before. J. Kwan: a 42 percent cut in the minister's office. That amounts to $20 million. if she's saying that it's just administrative and that it doesn't impact health care, then let the public be the judge. t ell british c olumbians what exactly was cut in her ministry that amounts to $20 million — line by line, account by account. Hon. I. Chong: a s i've indicated, in our ministry we have looked for savings.

Those savings have been in administration. i know the members don't want to hear that. They've also been in our discretionary spending. interjections. Mr. Speaker: t ake your seat. Members. c ontinue, Minister. Hon. I. Chong: They've also been in our discretion - ary spending. We've also decreased public servant travel. We've also decreased office and business expenditures as well as contract services, which allows us to maintain the vital services that protect public safety. Mr. Speaker: The member has a supplemental. [1420] J.

Kwan: it's incredible — $20 million in discretion - ary funding. is that what she's trying to tell british c olumbians, or is it the case that she actually doesn't know? Will she come clean and tell british c olumbians exactly where the cuts are coming from line by line, account by account, today? Hon. I. Chong: a gain, i wonder what the nDP were planning to cut when they announced $1.2 billion in further reductions that they have indicated. Where are they suggesting that those cuts be made?

We have committed to ensuring that our vital health services are protected. in case they've missed it, a further $80 million has been put aside, as well, to deal with a major issue that could be occurring this fall — the h1n1. N. Macdonald: The minister is talking about a 42.9 percent cut to a line item, and this is what the line item is for: health promotion, health protection, disease pre - vention, health assessment, disease surveillance. These are not insignificant.

The minister is standing up and telling us that 42.9 percent of her budget went towards discretionary and administrative payments. it is unbelievable. The minis - ter needs to stand up and tell us where those cuts are made. or does she not know? Hon. I. Chong: o ur ministry works with the prov - incial health officer and other health professionals who ensure that the population and public health is protected, ensuring that the programs and services delivered through this ministry provide for those very important outcomes of healthier lifestyles. For the members opposite to suggest… interjections. Mr.

Speaker: Members. Hon. I. Chong: … that the population and public health is at risk is absolutely irresponsible. Mr. Speaker: The member has a supplemental. N. Macdonald: We have a minister here who has had almost half of her budget cut, and she can either not answer the question, or she doesn't care. it is a simple question to stand up and name one of the cuts, even one of the cuts that this minister has made. What are they? it's 42.9 percent of the budget. it's gone. t ell the people of british c olumbia what you cut. Hon. I.

Chong: This ministry provides an important program dealing with immunization for young children. interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. c ontinue, Minister.

british c olumbia Debatest uesday, September 15, 2009 397 Hon. I. Chong: We work with non-profit organiza - tions to deliver healthier outcomes. We have reduced our childhood obesity rates. We are reducing tobacco use in this province. Population and public health is very important to this ministry, and we will continue to work with those partners to deliver the best, healthiest out - comes in all of c anada. [end of question period.] Tabling Documents Hon. C. Hansen: i rise to table two documents… interjections. Mr. Speaker: Members. c ontinue, Minister. Hon. C.

Hansen: …in accordance with legislation i have responsibility for. one, pursuant to the budget t ransparency and a ccountability a ct, is the prebudget consultation paper. The other, in accordance with the Financial a dministration a ct,

section 72(8), is the consoli- dated revenue fund guarantees and indemnities author- ized and issued for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009. [1425] Hon. B. Lekstrom: i seek leave to make an introduc - tion. Mr. Speaker: Proceed. Introductions by Members Hon. B. Lekstrom: Joining us today in the gallery are two gentlemen from the c anadian r enewable Fuels a ssociation. i would like the h ouse to help me welcome Gordon Quaiattini, who is the president, as well as Doug h ooper, who is the new chairman. Orders of the Day Hon. M. de Jong: i call continued debate on the budget. Mr.

Speaker: Members, we want to get on with the budget debate. Member for Surrey-newton has the floor. Budget Debate (continued) H. Bains: it's my honour to continue with my response to the budget. a s i was saying before the break, the people of this province have given up on this government because they believe they've been betrayed by this government. They feel that they were given wrong information, false information, before the election, and after the election they found out the truth.

They believe that this govern - ment actually kept that truth from them. [l. r eid in the chair.] Madam Speaker, i and all of you probably have heard from this government, and we've seen them all around…. What we have heard over and over again is that our economy is in the tank. We know its effects. The factories are closing. Sawmills are closing. There are job losses. People are losing their pensions. School budgets are cut. h ealth care budgets are cut. a ll of that was promised by this government — that they will not cut those services before the election. We all know that is all for real.

People are losing their jobs. There are foreclosures. People are having a tough time making payments, a tough time making their rent payments. but there's one other issue that is probably more important than that, which we are all facing right now. The integrity of this government is in the tank also. When that happens, it has a long-lasting effect on our democ - racy and democratic values that we care about. People start to lose trust in elected officials. That's exactly what this government is doing for the last eight years. They have lost the trust of people of the province.

People have felt that they have been lied to too many times in the last eight years. Madam Speaker, you know that in 2001 — and this is what people are telling us when we're walking the street, when we are meeting them in meeting halls — the Premier made a promise that he would not rip up the collective agreement of the hospital employee workers. but that was before the election.

What happened after the election was quite the oppos- ite. one of the first things this government did was rip up that collective agreement, throwing thousands of those hard-working people who provided very import - ant services in our hospitals and health care services on the street. [1430] Many of them happened to be women, immigrant families. They were thrown out on the streets so that this Premier and this government can bring in their multi - national friends to take benefits and profits out of our health care.

They gave them contracts to run those services at the expense of those working people, who were actually at the lower end of the wage scale. h ow do you justify that? Someone on that side has to have some heart. o bviously, they didn't. n o one stood up from that side — that this is the wrong thing to do. no one. interjection.

british c olumbia Debates398 t uesday, September 15, 2009 H. Bains: e xcept one. i must correct myself. a nd i do applaud that minister. h e happened to be minister today. Good job. one person had the heart to stand up to this government and this Premier — that that was the wrong thing to do. That's what the priorities of this government are all about. Do anything to help their multinational friends and multi-millionaires, at the expense of the working people. That's what took place during the heu .

They knew that they were breaking the law, or they ought to have known that they were breaking the law. it — the union, heu — took this government to the Supreme c ourt of c anada, and the Supreme c ourt of c anada had to come in and tell this government that they broke the law of this province. This is how bad this government has been. They don't care if they have to break their own laws, as long as their friends are happy. Then they told this province that they will not sell b.c. r ail. People still remember that. What happened after the election? That's exactly what they did.

They sold b.c. r ail, but then they tried to tell people…. They didn't even have the guts to stand up and say that they were breaking their promise. They had to tell them that no, it's not a sale. it's 999 years of lease. n o spine. Y ou have no spine whatsoever to stand up. Deputy Speaker: Member, i would caution you to use language that is parliamentary. H. Bains: Thank you very much. i will. Madam Speaker, they didn't stop there. n ow we fast- forward to this election.

This government, this Premier, this minister promised to the people of this province — knowing full well that the economy is eroding fast — that the maximum budget deficit would be $495 million. They were told that those numbers are not realistic. When the opposition brought that issue up, the min - ister stood up, and the other minister stood up right behind him. The Premier stood up — that the nDP is fearmongering.

The renowned economist h elmut Pastrick came out and said that those numbers are not real numbers, and he predicted that the real number would be close to more than $1.5 billion to $2 billion. e veryone knew that the budget deficit would be much, much higher — four, five or six times higher than what this government was leading people to believe — except this government and this minister. r ight till the time of the election, the Premier continued to say $495 million maximum.

Soon after the election, they started to turn around and said: "Y es, it is going to be higher than $495 million." [1435] The budget that we saw presented before us? a $2.8 billion deficit — over five times the numbers they were giving us before the election. The numbers that the opposition and all the economists were telling the gov - ernment are more realistic…. h ad they not brought in the hS t money from the federal government, the budget deficit would have been close to $3.5 billion or $3.6 billion. That's the history of this government i see these members on the other side applaud this Premier.

My question to them is…. Y es, people should be applauding their leaders. They should be applauding their colleagues. but should they be applauding the leader whose popularity right now is less than his shoe size because the people think he didn't tell the truth before the election? They are applauding that leader? What does that say about all of these folks sitting on the other side? This time not even one minister, one backbencher stood up and challenged the Premier: "We should come clean with the electorate. We should tell the truth to the electorate. We need to come clean.

We need to come up with the real numbers. We need to follow what the economists and everyone else are saying to us." i think the foundation of democracy, as we all know, is being upfront, transparent with your electorate. That's what the foundations of democracy were built on, but not for this government. When you do that, you are eroding what they have done in the last eight years. Y ou are actually on the way to erode democratic values that we care for, that people fought for and gave their lives for. Y es, on one hand, we have an economic situation.

The economy is in the tank. but when the government's integrity is in the tank, i think that leaves a long-last - ing effect on our coming generations. When they stop trusting their elected officials, they stop believing in democracy. Madam Speaker, they need to look in the mirror, each one of them, and think of what they are doing.

What kind of legacy are we leaving for our children and their children when we are talking about improving our democratic values, when we're talking about making changes and making society better through democratic means? it's being eroded by the actions of one person and the rest of them following that one person that hap- pens to be the Premier. Y ou're all guilty by simply not standing up, by simply not standing up and saying…. Deputy Speaker: Member. H. Bains: Through the c hair, Madam Speaker. Deputy Speaker: i would ask you to withdraw. H.

Bains: i withdraw, Madam Speaker. i'm sure, on their side of the h ouse, their offices must have received the e-mails, telephone calls, letters and phone calls about the direction this government is going.

british c olumbia Debatest uesday, September 15, 2009 399 on hS t , people don't like the tax itself, but they're more angry about how it was brought in. They were promised that they had no plans to bring in hS t .

The restaurant industry asked that very, very specific ques - tion during the election: "o ther provinces are bringing in hS t . is your government considering bringing in hS t?" This government, through the Premier's office, advised them they had no plan of bringing in hS t . but after the election we were told that this was the single best thing that they could do to boost the economy. if this was such a great idea to boost the economy, then why didn't they stand up before the election and lay it out for the public to question them and ask questions about how it is going to affect them, who's going to pay and how much? a nd why didn't they tell the truth?

Why didn't they tell the truth? [1440] The restaurant industry. r ight now the president of that association feels that he has been betrayed, that the industry has been betrayed by this government. Madam Speaker, no wonder my constituents, and i'm sure your constituents — 85 percent of the people — do not believe the story that is being told by this government. They do not believe that this government didn't know that the budget would be $495 million maximum deficit. They do not believe that they had no plan to bring in the hS t .

They believe that they won this election through falsehood, and they feel misled and betrayed. That's not a very good example that we are setting for coming generations. n o wonder such a low turnout in the last election. We're not helping. We're not helping by not being upfront with the electorate. We're not helping them to come and vote and participate in a democratic system by not being honest with them or open with them about what we intend to do as a government. Many of them are labelling the last eight years as a decade of deception, and rightfully so.

Decade of decep- tion — that's not something that i take joy in saying, but that's what it is out there. e veryone you talk to — 85 percent of the people — feels that those eight years have been nothing but deception. So what do we do? i guess there are folks out there…. The grass-roots support is building. There are rallies being held in all communities in this province trying to bring it to this government's attention that what they're doing is wrong. i think if the hS t …. They're asking this question. i'm sure each one of you has heard this, on both sides of the h ouse.

The people are asking this question. if the hS t is such a great idea, why don't you put it for a referendum? l et people decide. c onvince them that this is the greatest idea that you've ever come across. l et people decide. but you know what? n o one on that side has the cour- age to take that task and ask that question, because they know the answer. They know that the public is very, very angry with them. They know the answer they're going to get is a resounding no to this hS t . Then they brought in a number of different people here, and they paraded them through this hall.

Who stood behind this Premier and said how wonderful this hS t is for them? Well, one of those groups was the ceo s of the forest industry. l et me talk about that group, because i have background in the forest industry, and i remember the promises that they made in order to get changes made to the Forest a ct by this government.

They asked this government in 2003 to deregulate the forest industry, to give them everything that they needed so that they had a free hand to do whatever they wanted to do with the logs that belonged to you, me and the public out there — whether they would process them, sell them or not harvest them at all. They needed that kind of free hand.

They wanted to have that social contract that existed in that industry since the 1950s, where the public logs were given to this industry, and they would then in return process those logs through their own mills in those communities to create jobs for those commun - ities in this province. it was a win-win situation. but that industry didn't want anything to do with it. They got everything from this government, but the promise they made in return was that they would invest about a bil - lion dollars in the industry to create more jobs. [1445] n ot a single job was created.

They got everything, but not a single job was created. instead, they went across the line and started spending money over there. n ow they're shipping raw logs across the line at the expense of our communities and our forestry workers. The same industry now is saying: "We're so happy that we're going to benefit to the tune of $140 million through this deal." So their credibility with the public and the forest industry workers and their communities is zero — just like this government. Madam Speaker, i have received many e-mails in my constituency about this hS t , and i'll read you one.

This one is from John cohen. This person is saying that bestowing the hS t now is tantamount to giving a man dying of thirst sour wine. That's what John cohen is saying. h ere's another one — a nnie h ewitt. "What else is he lying to us about? We need to unite and fight this tax. r allies, demonstrations, letters…." Deputy Speaker: Member. Member, language must be parliamentary. i ask you to withdraw. H. Bains: i withdraw, Madam Speaker. This is the e-mail that i'm reading verbatim that i received. i withdraw. Y ou get the flavour.

These are the kinds of e-mails we're getting in our offices, and i'm sure they're getting them there as well.

british c olumbia Debates400 t uesday, September 15, 2009 Hon. M.

Stilwell: it's a pleasure to stand this after - noon and speak in support of the September 2009 budget update. a s every british c olumbian knows, our province is not immune from the economic challenges facing every part of the world. a s a small, open economy that depends on international trade for much of its rev - enue, jobs and prosperity, our province continues to face the day-to-day impacts of reduced commodity prices, ever-increasing competition abroad and soft markets on virtually every front. h owever, as i said when i had the opportunity to rise to speak to the throne speech, i did not get elected so i could come to Victoria to be afraid of the future. a ll around us we are seeing and hearing of more posi- tive changes in the world's economy.

While these posi - tive changes do not signal a wholesale change in our economic fortunes, together they look and feel like the start of an economic turnaround, and while better days are still some way off, they will come. by some early measures, they are already on their way. n evertheless, the past year has left much of our provincial economy reeling, and the economic down - turn has seen a responding decline in revenues to the government. t aken together, all of these issues point to the need for strong fiscal management now more than ever.

Y ou see, it's critical with so much change still upon us that we find the right balance between our strong belief in balanced budgets and the short-term need for prov - incial deficits that will allow us to meet our core com - mitments to health care, education and social services for those most in need. The key is finding a balance, and i believe my colleague the hon. Minister of Finance has found just such a balance in his budget update.

The key is to know how much is enough before it becomes too much. h ow much debt can british c olumbians afford? a nd how do we ensure that we don't go past that fundamental tipping point and put the future generations into jeopardy with more debt than can be reasonably managed? e qually important, as government, we need to follow the example being shown today and every day by british c olumbia's families. We must do what every family is doing today. We have to separate the absolute necessities from those things that are important but not critical.

We need to separate the things that are necessary for today from things we can do without until this important eco- nomic corner is turned. i believe the Minister of Finance has done just that by taking a measured and responsible approach to where we are going to spend our scarce resources and where we need to hold, reduce or elimin - ate spending.

The fact is, the easiest thing in the world for a polit - ician to do is spend money, particularly other people's money and, more importantly perhaps, money we don't have. it's also easy as politicians to fall prey to the special interests with sharp elbows who want to get at the pre - cious taxpayer dollars as they push others aside and who have no real regard for cost and what that does to future debt and deficits. [1450] Madam Speaker, we cannot let that happen, particu - larly these days when getting ten cents out of a nickel should be the order of the day for all of us on both sides of the h ouse. a fter all, we all know there is one taxpayer, and we spend money on their behalf — their money. it's imperative that we are doing it with a real understand - ing of how hard families work to make that money in the first place.

The budget update is a sound, realistic and forward- thinking response to our current economic conditions. it limits spending. it limits deficits. it keeps more money in people's pockets. it continues to commit us as a prov- ince to three fundamental outcomes: maintaining vital services during tough times, stimulating the economy, saving and creating jobs and encouraging investment by making our province even more competitive. This new budget increases funding for health services by 18 percent over three years. That means that by 2012, b.c.'s health budget will be some $15.7 billion.

That's more than $4 million a day, or nearly $170,000 per hour. This increase in health funding is, in itself, the kind of proof positive that our government has its fiscal prior - ities in the right place. in addition, the budget update provides $420 mil - lion to meet the needs of greater demand for income assistance due to the recession. it's another example of making sure government is there for british c olumbians when its help is needed by the most vulnerable in our province.

While getting through those tough times is our pri - mary focus, we have not lost sight of the future. a fter all, part of government's work is to work with british c olumbians to map out the kind of province we want to be in the years ahead. That's why our commitment to delivering full-day kindergarten starting in September 2010 is important. We all know that giving a child an early start on a good education can make a world of dif- ference, not just to the child but to the communities that will ultimately benefit from their talents and expertise in the years to come.

That commitment to the future is also a big part of my own ministry. This year the Ministry of a dvanced e ducation and l abour Market Development is receiv - ing record levels of funding against the background of a tough economy. We are committed to helping british c olumbians get the skills and education they want and need to participate fully in the economy. by 2012, b.c.'s annual commitment to post-secondary education will exceed $4.7 billion. in addition, the new budget update includes increased training tax credits for businesses that take on apprentices. in fact, today

british c olumbia Debatest uesday, September 15, 2009 401 employers can claim up to $4,000 annually — double the previous amount for eligible apprentices. a t this important time, when government infrastruc - ture projects can go a long way to stimulating the econ - omy, british c olumbia is in partnership, working with other levels of government right across the province.

Since February of this year 480 projects worth $3.4 bil - lion have been announced, and the projects announced to date are creating more than 21,000 direct jobs over three years. a t the same time we know it's essential for british c olumbia to remain competitive in a shrinking and more competitive world. We're working to build the most competitive business tax system in c anada, because we know that businesses that are competitive can create more jobs.

That's why over the past eight years this gov- ernment has reduced taxes more than 120 times — tax reductions that benefit people and businesses alike right across british c olumbia. For instance, in 2008 our small business tax rate was reduced by 44 percent, and our government intends to take small business corporate income tax to zero by 2012.

We've been reducing general corporate income tax rates, as well, with an eye to making sure that b.c. business and b.c. workers are competitive at home and abroad and that we can continue to grow jobs in this province. on the personal income tax front, the personal income tax credit will increase in 2010 from $9,373 to $11,000. t oday anyone earning up to $118,000 in b.c. pays the lowest provincial personal income tax in the country. e qually important, since 2001 personal tax rates have been reduced by 37 percent for most british c olumbians, and 325,000 people with lower incomes no longer pay any b.c. income tax. i started my comments by stressing the importance of finding a balance — a balance between core services and those things we'd like to have but cannot afford until better economic times; a balance between making immediate decisions for today and the importance of keeping the future at the front of our mind; and bal - ancing the long-term importance of balanced budgets with the need, when times are tight, to accept limited deficits that can see us through tough but temporary times. [1455] a s we all know, deficits are easy to get into but tough to get out of. in 2001 this government needed nerves of steel to make the tough but necessary decisions to put us on the road to economic prosperity. it wasn't easy, but it was done, and it worked. n ow we want to make sure we have the self-discipline as a province not to trap ourselves into living off our credit cards or lines of credit, as it were.

Spending tomorrow's money today is easy.

Paying it back is the hard part. h owever, the Minister of Finance has put a strong and balanced plan in place. h e recognizes the need for temporary deficits but not the kind of ongoing structural deficits that will mire taxpayers into greater and greater debt, with no sign of relief. l ike most british c olumbians, i appreciate having governments that spend within our means, and like most british c olumbians, i know that the necessity of temporary deficits, as much as we may dislike it, is a reality, a necessity. but it doesn't and shouldn't become a way of life or a way of running government. i'm grateful that the Minister of Finance has brought forward a responsible approach to these tough times. i commend his commitment to the most important pri - orities of british c olumbians, and i applaud his respect for taxpayers and what we can afford as individuals, businesses and families.

The turnaround seems to have begun. n evertheless, there's plenty of work still to do. This budget recog - nizes this fact. This budget has its feet planted firmly on the ground but has a keen eye on the future. This is a commonsense budget, and as a taxpayer and as a mother and as an Mla, i'm looking forward to supporting it. R.

Fleming: Thank you, Madam Speaker, for the opportunity to respond to the budget 2009 from the government this afternoon. before i begin, though, i want to thank a few people in my constituency and my community, especially the ones that work on behalf of me every day, while i'm here in particular. i think first, though, i would like to thank the electors from my constituency of Victoria–Swan l ake.

They've placed their confidence and trust in me to represent them here during the lifetime of this parliament, and i'm very pleased to be working on their behalf. i think that all of us on both sides of the h ouse were disappointed with the low voter turnout in the provin - cial election on May 12. i hope that all members in this h ouse did take some valuable experiences away from the campaign as well as a commitment for all of us to try and change that number.

That is a trend we most def - initely as legislators want to reverse in the interests of democracy. e ven though the turnout was much lower than any of us would hope for, i have to say that the conversa - tions i had as a candidate knocking on people's doors, working in the community, attending events….

The ideas i came away with in that campaign to bring to this place to improve public services, to make health care work better, to fight for communities and keep jobs and create jobs and embrace the new economy, all of those kinds of things…. i was amazingly impressed at the depth and the scope of ideas that my constituents conveyed to me. i think that all of us as legislators should look at this opportunity in this parliament to try and strengthen this institution and allow as much opportunity as pos - sible for good ideas to come from wherever they may

british c olumbia Debates402 t uesday, September 15, 2009 come — from whatever part of the province, from what - ever political perspective or ideology — to make gov - ernment work better. i should first and foremost thank my senior con - stituency assistant, Marni offman, who hopefully isn't watching this speech today but serving my constituents — as i'm sure she is, because the phone never stops ring- ing in that place. She has worked hard for many years on my behalf.

She continues to do so. i have an incredible amount of debt to repay her for all of the help she has provided me as an Mla, and she keeps doing her job. i also must thank a lice r oss, who is my part-time constituency assistant. She does an incredible amount of work, and effective work, for people who come into my constituency office, who inquire on a daily basis.

She has worked for me for a number of years too. [1500] i hope both of them will keep working for me. i don't think the job will get any easier, but i need them to be able to do it, as all of us value our constituency assistants as really the heart of the community office and one of the primary functions that make government accessible to our citizens. So thank you to both of them. in the l egislature here i want to thank brian k owalski, who is my legislative assistant, and i want to thank t racey Janes, who is my research assistant.

There are 85 legislators in this place, who represent very distinct parts of a regionally diverse province. but one of the things we have in common, no matter where we're from, is that communities work and succeed basic- ally on the same basis. a s Mla s try and help their constituents to get help, to get the assistance they need to solve problems of things that get in their way — some challenges they have in life — i think Mla s gain a unique understanding and appreciation for community associations, for civic lead- ers in our community, for volunteers of all kinds who are providing services and filling needs for kids and parents, for families, for the elderly in our community, for our poorest citizens, for our most vulnerable.

Those organ - izations, those leaders, those people who volunteer their time ensure that our citizens get the help they need. o ur communities are served by dedicated people in the arts, the cultural sector, multicultural societies, sports teams, local conservation and environmental organizations and a host of other activities that together make our province a unique place, make our constituen- cies and communities distinct and a desirable place to live within.

That is why — i will return to this point later — one of my strongest objections to this budget is that it forgets these ingredients that make up successful communities. it pulls funding, without warning, of even the smallest gaming grants or contracted services to the very organ - izations that make up civil society in british c olumbia. Those kinds of shortsighted cuts are going to have long- term, real and devastating repercussions. Quite a change from the February budget, i might add. These organizations had no idea.

Some of them had written three-year agreements with this government to continue providing services to british c olumbia, to con- tinue filling needs within our society, and this budget pulls that away. People are struggling to make ends meet. We know that. We hear from those people in our communities every day. They need a government that's here for them. They need a government that is helping young people as well as displaced workers get the retraining opportun - ities that they need.

They need a government that values and places emphasis on having successful kids from the very earliest age by investing in things like quality child care services and nutrition programs. My constituents, no different from any other mem - bers in this place, want public safety. They want a jus - tice system that's effective. They don't want cuts to our court system, crown prosecutors and policing services in our communities. They don't believe, even in these extraordinary economic times, that there is any justifi - cation for doing that, especially when the government promised the exact opposite.

People in british c olumbia want a government that's on their side to fight for and create jobs.

Y ou know, when i hear of workers facing plant closures, pooling their savings together, taking risks to help their communities survive, to keep food on the table for their families, i would expect the government to be a player at that table, to be a very interested and engaged party. a ll too often, in every corner of this province, workers facing that situation and companies facing those situations are let down. [1505] i think it's fair to say that a number of people in lead - ing industries in british c olumbia are pretty shocked in the hundred days since the election has passed. t alk to tourism leaders in this day and age.

They will tell you that they cannot understand, for the life of them, why this government would take an independent crown organization, an international award-winning market - ing service provided by that crown organization — suc - cessful, thriving tourism industry even in these difficult times — and the tens of thousands of small businesses and the hundreds of thousands of jobs that depend on the success of that marketing and tourism coordinated effort, and blow it up so the minister can put himself in as the new ceo and sweep away the experienced people, get rid of the board of directors of t ourism b.c. n obody knows the real answer as to why that was done, but there is definitely a consensus out there that that was one of the dumbest things this government could have done in the high season of the summer.

People don't understand why the government chose a recession, in which some of the defining features are

british c olumbia Debatest uesday, September 15, 2009 403 sagging consumer confidence and low sales activity across a variety of purchasing points in the economy, as the time to implement and dramatically increase sales taxes.

There is definitely going to be an effect on con - sumption, and this is not the time to gamble with that. l et's look at one sector where there has been a tre - mendous falling off of economic activity, and that would be the residential construction sector. a t this point this year, compared to this exact month last fiscal year, new units of housing starts in my community alone in the metro Victoria area are down by 75 percent. That's an incredible statistic.

What it means is that thousands of people who were employed last year — skilled people, apprentices, contractors — who had work, who had money circulating in the economy have downed tools. They're on unemployment insurance. That's why b.c. has the highest growth rate of new ei applicants month over month for the last six months. That's not a statistic to be proud of, and it's one that — incredibly — this government, in the middle of an elec - tion, ordered b.c. Statistics not to release. t alk about political interference. imagine that.

That was glossed over in the sleepy days of summer, but what we now know is that welfare caseload statistics showed an incredible increase, in percentage terms, of families who now were on social assistance, which are routinely released by b.c. Statistics. This is not a political agency. This is an information outlet. The long reach of the partisan political wing of government suppressed the release of that informa - tion because it was inconvenient to the Premier's mes - sage that everything was fine, that the deficit was $495 million maximum and all the other stuff that came up during the election.

That happened. People in british c olumbia are angry that the govern- ment has shown them no respect and gave them no indi- cation during the election and for many months after that they were about to trigger a fundamental shift — a regres- sive shift in the way taxes are collected, from whom they are collected and what services they will pay for in british c olumbia. nobody was given the courtesy of that.

That is a major policy issue that very definitely deserves full and considered debate. a nd you know what? it deserves the full airing in an election campaign, because if you can't convince british c olumbians that this is "the single best thing we can do for our economy," which the Premier has said repeatedly, then you don't have a mandate to bring it in. h e decided not to get a mandate for that policy change. h e didn't talk about it, not once during the election, but now it strains all credibility for him to suggest that none of this was underway, that this hadn't been under active consideration. o ne of his own former caucus members has admitted as much — that they were talking about the hS t in l iberal caucus meetings before the election.

We've heard from senior executive members of this government, including the Premier himself, that no, that wasn't the case. "We arrived at this sometime in late June." That's the hallmark of this budget.

The hS t betrayal is the hallmark of this budget. if there is anything for the ages in this budget, that's what it will be remembered for, and that's about it — probably with a significant foot - note, because it will cost families every month. [1510] They will be reminded of this — that it also was a budget that put in place an escalating, cumulative increase of 18 percent to the MSP premiums they pay every month.

That's money out of families — in the numbers that the Finance Ministry wouldn't share but which have been analyzed independently — that dwarves the paltry tax cuts through lifting the income exemption for the first $11,000 of earnings. c ompletely outweighs it. This is a tax increase budget that this government is hiding. The appalling thing, too, is that british c olumbians have learned since the election….

This is something the government never campaigned on, and i would respect them if they had campaigned on it. if they had gone out to the voters and said, "Y ou know, after the election, for those of you on wait-lists for hips or knees or other surgical procedures, you can expect to wait 30 percent longer because we're going to cut budgets that fund those kinds of surgeries," i would respect them having said that and having a debate on whether it was neces - sary or not. but they didn't. Quite the contrary. They made assur- ances over and over again.

The Premier and his former h ealth Minister said that health care funding would be protected, that health authorities were being funded adequately, that plans and wait-lists for those kinds of diagnostic and elective surgeries would not increase.

That commitment was made, and barely 90 days after the election that commitment was broken by this budget that we're being asked to consider. n ow, this is a unique budget in many other ways. i don't want to shortchange it. it's not often that you get two budgets within the same fiscal year, one in February and one in September. it's not often that the second budget has a deficit figure six times larger than the ori - ginal figure tabled in this very place.

The budget that wasn't debated, remember, in February — tabled but never debated. n ow we're debating the real one, and it's a sixfold increase on the original deficit projections. These are discrepancies from the b.c. l iberals like night and day, like before the election and after the election. Perhaps there's a third category there because, as we've learned from the Finance Minister and the Premier, there was also a secret shroud called during the election. both of them, after denying it, have now admitted that they were fully briefed and made aware by senior deputy

british c olumbia Debates404 t uesday, September 15, 2009 ministers of this government — both to the Premier's office and the Finance Minister's office — during the election. Their story changed, and that's another ele - ment of this budget that british c olumbians have a real hard problem with.

We'll remember that the way this government depicted the economy and revenue projections before the election was quite different than how it's being portrayed now in September of 2009. r emember back in February, even as all the signs in the world economy were obvious to everybody, even as l ehman bros. became a household word in our vocabularies…. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The u .S. financial sector melting down. e very con- tinent being affected by dramatically revised downward growth projections. e ven with all of that background, we had this Premier, this Finance Minister, this government saying: "b .c. is immune to the global recession. We're immune, and that's why instead of an a lberta-sized deficit of $5 billion, b.c.'s will be only $495 million maximum, or it might be lower." Don't forget that the Premier did give himself some wiggle room to be lower during the election.

That was the mantra before and during the cam - paign. a nytime our economy showed signs to the con - trary, anytime the news media showed families out of work and people suffering, anytime the forest industry reported statistics like — gee, i don't know — 25,000 fewer families getting a paycheque from the forest sector in one single year just before this budget was tabled in February — the fictitious budget…. e very time that was said, the government ignored these precipitous warning signs. e very time we had a new statistic out about b.c.'s trade deficit, which is now $40 billion per annum, they ignored it. [1515] The reality was that all during the lead-up time to the February budget, b.c. led c anada in a number of statis- tics. one of them was the worst loss rate of full-time jobs in the economy over the previous 12 months.

The other statistic that the government ignored completely in any discussion or briefing around the budget was that at that time, b.c. was the second-worst-performing economy in the country. What did they say today, when they conveniently pushed all of this aside just a few short months ago? Well, as the throne speech says, to quote it…. This is government speaking, of course. "We were brutally deceived by the economy. This inanimate object deceived us." That's what has caused all this, according to the government.

We've gone from February — when b.c. was the exception and was going to weather the global reces - sion that was touching everybody else in the world — to being brutally deceived, to suddenly being in the midst of the worst recession in three decades. t urns out we aren't recession-proof, now the Premier concedes. Well, it wasn't the economy that brutally deceived us. it was the governing party that brutally deceived us in the election campaign, even as their ministers and Premier were being advised during the campaign that revenues were sliding off the map. That's where the brutal decep - tion lies.

Y ou know, i like some of the new l iberal talking points that are coming out. There are a couple of them. The first one i want to speak to is that the opposition now is somehow complicit in government budget deception because, after all, we based our costed election platform using the same numbers produced and verified by the Ministry of Finance. We used those numbers to show and illustrate our dif- ferent spending priorities and different commitments to british c olumbians.

So wow, i guess we should plead guilty. i guess we are as gullible as the rest of the british c olumbia voters out there for believing numbers that were actually published by this government. Plead guilty to that. We're all guilty of assuming that the Finance Minister actually meant it, that his word meant some - thing when he said that the deficit would be $495 mil - lion — that he was serious. That's an incredible talking point. it was a fundamen- tal tenet of the story that has been knitted together by this government to explain this betrayal.

The other one that i really like was helpfully coughed up by the member from Parksville when he sug - gested that government couldn't have deceived british c olumbians on the hS t . h e said this: "We couldn't have been planning the hS t all along because it's been com - municated so badly by us." That's what he said. That was his explanation for why the government would flip-flop on the hS t , make guar- antees to the restaurant and hospitality industry in sur - veys and election commitments during the campaign. They suggested that that industry and others could take to the bank why they would flip-flop on that.

The member from Parksville is basically saying: "We weren't dishonest. We've just been incredibly incompetent on the hS t ." That's the substance of his comment.

When the Premier made the admission a couple of weeks ago that dropped a lot of jaws around b.c…. h e admitted for the first time that during the election, he was briefed, that he was aware that hundreds of millions of dollars of revenue had disappeared. but i think the questions are important to keep asking — of when the Premier and the Finance Minister pre - cisely knew what information about the true state of british c olumbia's finances, when the conversations with o ttawa around moving towards the harmonized sales tax were precisely entered into by this government. [1520] Y ou know, it really doesn't matter for the government. british c olumbians — 75 percent of them or more — don't believe the story that's been concocted. but it's

british c olumbia Debatest uesday, September 15, 2009 405 important. a ll of us should feel that it is important for government to come clean on this point and others if the institution that we represent is going to have integrity. i said at the beginning of my remarks that we're all concerned about declining voter turnout. Well, if you want to drive voter turnout down, keep acting like this. This is why people are cynical about politics. They are cynical about politics when governments treat them this way — with disrespect and contempt — and act as if they're stupid and they can't figure it out.

Well, they have figured it out now. They formed a very solid opinion of the Premier and this government and their conduct, and they're mad. l et's go back to some of the warning signs the Finance Minister had available to him well before the election. r emember that h elmut Pastrick, b.c . credit union's chief economist for the c entral credit u nion and one of the forecasters in the economic Forecast c ouncil, began to warn this minister that he was hopelessly wrong on the deficit. a t that time he said: "Y ou're at least off by a mag- nitude of threefold." it's since been verified as sixfold.

The Finance Minister ignored him — actually attacked him in the media, attacked him professionally. but we ask questions in this place. Mr. Pastrick was asking decent questions as well — and others. We asked questions in this place on February 17. We asked the minister how his budget could be based on assumptions around per - sonal income tax revenues going up when at the same time we had just lost 68,000 full-time positions in british c olumbia, when our workforce had suffered that kind of drop in the employment numbers. Who was going to pay those enhanced income tax revenues?

The minister didn't answer. i also asked the minister if he had a second budget, if he had a September budget, a September surprise. h e mocked the suggestion at the time, but we asked: "Do you have a second plan here, given the revenue vulner - ability, to come back post-election to this h ouse and introduce a budget that will worsen the quality of health care, that will pull money away from education, that will make cuts to things like student loan budgets?" i heard the Minister of a dvanced e ducation not mention that once in her remarks most recently.

"a re you going to come back to this h ouse…?" i don't even think we could imagine this point, but now that we're in it….

"a re you going to come back with a budget that pulls out hundreds of millions of dollars of gaming grants from every conceivable charitable and non- profit organization that is the social fabric of this prov - ince, and the services they provide? a re you going to do that?" That's basically what we asked the minister way back in February. if he was wrong and if the economists who were saying his revenue projections were built on sand, what was he going to do? a nd they mocked the sugges - tion. They mocked it. but what are we doing here this very afternoon?

We're debating the budget that we knew was going to come. We're living through the September surprise that this government has pulled on b.c. taxpayers and b.c. cit - izens. There's going to be an incredible price for that — a political price for the government certainly, but a social and human price in all of our communities. We asked the minister, because there were a number of suggestions that revenues were falling away in british c olumbia the very moment and prior to the tabling of that budget in February, if he would seek an update on the status of those revenues following our questions.

We now know that he got several updates during the writ period and during the election campaign and that that admission actually came after he told this h ouse the first week we were back that he had no communi - cations whatsoever with Finance officials. indeed, he actually said that it would be inappropriate for him to do that.

Then the very next week he said: "o h, wait a minute. i did have those conversations on at least sev - eral occasions." This is how the story keeps changing, and this is why british c olumbians keep digging for the truth on this. but he knew his February numbers were built on sand, and he had 90 days to hold it together, to get through the election, to keep the budget fiction together. n ow the minister says, or said — the story has changed — that he wasn't aware of all the sorts of things that undermined his budget today. but the warning signs were there on the revenue. i've mentioned one example. on all counts that were raised in this h ouse in February, they've since been proven true. [1525] on February 18 the opposition asked the minis - ter why he expected sales tax revenues to go up in his budget at the very same time that sales figures and retail confidence were tanking. interjection.

R. Fleming: Well, i think i answered that to the hon. member. h e said: "Why did we use those numbers?" interjections. R. Fleming: r ight, right. it's our fault for believing government numbers that are printed on…. Y ou know what? t o follow their logic, anything printed by Queen's Printer should not be believed. That's what they're saying. That's incredible. Wow.

Madam Speaker, we asked why sales tax revenues were scheduled to increase in that February budget when retail confidence was tanking. on February 24 we informed the minister — he should have been informed already — that there had been an increase of 50,000

british c olumbia Debates406 t uesday, September 15, 2009 unemployment claims. That was a 33 percent rise on the year prior. on this basis, his revenue forecasts were unsupportable on the income tax side. n ow we hear that the e conomic Forecast c ouncil, which met in January — they took the midpoint at that time — was not convened in March. it's interesting that they weren't, because they most certainly would have recommended — as h elmut Pastrick did publicly — an adjustment to that deficit figure.

They would have rec - ommended that right on the eve of the election. but they were not allowed to convene a meeting. The Forecast c ouncil wasn't allowed to meet and revise its estimates. it's amazing. n ow, let's not forget…. Deputy Speaker: Thank you, Member. R. Fleming: Sorry. t ime flies when you're having fun and being heckled by the governing side. but i do thank you for the time this afternoon, Madam Speaker, to take my place in this debate. Hon. B.

Lekstrom: it is truly a privilege to stand in this h ouse to give my response to the budget that was pre - sented before the members in this legislative assembly. i too, like the members before me, would like to start off with recognizing and thanking a number of people. i want to start by thanking the people of Peace r iver South, who put their trust in me to serve them as their member of this l egislative a ssembly, and for that, i am grateful and humbled. i want to thank my campaign team, who worked tire - lessly, as they do for each and every one of us during campaigns.

They give of their time, they give up their family time, and they put in a great deal of effort to work and believe in what we as Mla s have to offer. i want to say a special thank-you to my campaign team and a special thank-you to my friend and campaign manager, Mr. Paul Gevatkoff, who has done tremendous work for me over the years. i want to thank a gentleman in my constituency office back in Dawson c reek, Mr. Jim n oble. i've had the honour of working with Jim for, gosh, the better part of 15 years, since i began working with the city of Dawson creek as an elected official.

Jim served there in the capacity of clerk and then later as the chief administrative officer. in 2001, when i was elected after he had retired from the city, he came and joined me there. i want to say a heartfelt thank- you to him for the work that he does on my behalf. a special thank-you to my family — to my wife, Vicki, and our daughters l indsey and t aiya. [c. t revena in the chair.] For the 15 years since i've been involved in political life from the municipal level and then on to the provincial level, they have been my largest supporters and without hesitation have supported me in my endeavours. i can tell you that it is not without sacrifice on every person's

part in a family. i know i can speak for all of us in this h ouse that there are days when we're sitting here that you're mis - sing a family member's birthday or an anniversary or a special occasion, and there's that wrenching feeling in your stomach. but i can tell you that what makes it better is that you know they want you here doing the work that you were asked to do.

So for that, i give my heartfelt thanks to my family. i want to speak about the budget that's before us today, which we are debating in this l egislature, and really reflect on some numbers as i go through this. [1530] i want to talk about the overall budget seen in February, which produced a $39.3 billion budget on expenditures that we were going to spend to deliver the services that british c olumbians want and enjoy.

Since that time we've seen significant change, but the budget that we are debating today, the September update and the new budget, is not $39.3 billion in expenses but rather $40.133 billion — an increase in expenditures.

What we're debating here, i think it's fair to say — i don't want to put words in the mouth of the opposition; i've been told i shouldn't do that — is not a cut in the budget. r eally, an allocation of that funding would be a better way to put it. in comparison i can look back from '01-02. i grabbed my budget books. i keep my documents; i catch heck for that once in a while. in 2003-2004 our budget in british c olumbia was $27.8 billion. t oday, in 2009-10, we're debating a budget that is over $40 billion. That

Document details

Collection	British Columbia — Debates (Hansard)
Citation	H0915pm-04
Type	hansard
Volume / chapter	H0915pm 04
Language	en
Format	pdf
Source	PROVINCIAL
Identifier	d9c4d92e02df23459f6bd6d6e439e4346ae78498

Source file is stored in the law ingest library (pdf).