Newfoundland and Labrador Hansard — Members' Statements; Statements by Ministers — 18 June 2020 (49th General Assembly, 1st Session, Vol. XLIX No. 42)
2020-06-18
Newfoundland and Labrador — Debates (Hansard)
PDF Version
June 18, 2020
HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY PROCEEDINGS
Vol. XLIX No. 42
The
House met at 1:30 p.m.
MR. SPEAKER (Reid):
Order, please!
Admit
strangers.
Statements by
Members
MR. SPEAKER:
Today we will hear Members'
statements from the hon. Members for the Districts of Harbour Main, Windsor
Lake, St. John's Centre, Topsail - Paradise, Placentia West - Bellevue, and it's
my understanding that the Member for Burin - Grand Bank is seeking leave to
present a Member's statement as well.
The hon.
the Member for Harbour Main.
MS. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
It is
with great pleasure that I share with all hon. Members how a church group in the
District of Harbour Main transformed the lonely times of the pandemic into
something quite extraordinary for seniors.
The
elderly, in particular, have been deeply impacted by COVID-19 and have felt the
psychological toll of the quarantine and isolation. St. Peter's Anglican Church
in Upper Gullies immediately recognized this vulnerability and were determined
to find ways to get the seniors in their congregation connected despite social
distancing measures.
They
recognized the importance of educating their elderly on technology, so with the
guidance of a 17-year-old tech wizard, designed and created a program to help
and assist seniors on how to use all the modern-day applications. The church
group was delighted when they received a grant from Advanced Education, Skills
and Labour in support of this initiative.
It is
heartwarming to hear some of the finer moments of the pandemic when an
82-year-old lady, like a pro, turns on her iPad at her kitchen table every
Sunday morning and tunes in on Facebook Live to attend the local church service.
I ask
all Members of this House to join me in paying tribute to St. Peter's Anglican
Church in Upper Gullies for their innovation and the loving concern they have
shown for their elders.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for St.
John's Centre.
MR. J. DINN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr.
Speaker, Mother Teresa said: Not all of us can do great things, but we can do
small things with great love. Sometimes, something as simple as picking up a
piece of trash can be a tremendous act of respect for the environment and love
for the world we all share.
For over
25 years, Walter Harding, his wife, Kimberly, and a dedicated core of volunteers
have waged a quiet war against litter in St. John's. Members of this
enthusiastic team are: Jill Bruce, Shirley Parsons, Anna Penney, Donna Imhoff,
Ernie Walsh and Rod Pomeroy.
Walter
has been organizing neighbourhood cleanups – often at his own expense –
throughout the metro region. So far this year, Walter and his team have
collected 300 of their annual 1,000-bag goal. In pre-COVID times, Walter
normally organized 20 to 40 volunteers for weekend cleanups throughout the
spring. For now, it's just him and his wife. A pointless exercise? After all,
it's not their litter. But to Walter and his team it's their world and their
problem to solve. It's a labour of love.
I ask
hon. Members of this House to join me in recognizing the great work of Walter
Harding and his team. I challenge us to go one step further: commit to picking
up one piece of trash a day. Let's all be a little more like Walter.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Topsail - Paradise.
MR. P. DINN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
From May
2 to 9, Louise and Bernie Mercer of the beautiful District of Topsail - Paradise
held a food drive to honour their late children's birthday. Alex and Riley
Mercer both shared the same birthdate. Though years apart, both were lost to a
rare form of brain cancer: Alex, when she was in elementary school and Riley as
a teenager. Both parents wanted to do something special for their birthdays and
also wanted it to be a community event. Thus, seven years ago SOAR was born –
the Spirit of Alex and Riley.
The food
drive, headquartered every year at the Salvation Army Church in Long Pond, has
been embraced by residents as a way to honour the Mercer family's courage and
grace, and give back to the community by supporting the efforts of the food
bank. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Mercers held a virtual birthday where
they accepted monetary donations, raising $27,905 that went directly to the
CBS/Paradise Community Food Bank. The Mercers said that as long as there is a
need in the community, they will continue this as a way of thanking the
community and as a way for those who helped them in their time of need.
Mr.
Speaker, I would like to thank the Mercers for what they do for their community
and to say what a wonderful and beautiful tribute to Alex and Riley.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Windsor Lake.
MR. CROSBIE:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I pay
tribute to the MacMorran Community Centre who stayed operational during this
difficult time and continued to operate its food bank to provide the essentials
for those in their community.
coordination with local restaurants, they ensured hot meals were provided
throughout the neighbourhood on a weekly basis. Staff connected with those in
need on an ongoing basis to ensure their food and supplies were met during the
pandemic. Staff put together comfort and activity kits for seniors and school
children, which were delivered on an ongoing basis. Finally, staff worked with
the schools to ensure that educational work was distributed to the children in
the community.
The
MacMorran Community Centre stands out not only as a beacon of hope and
compassion, but is a prime example of the tireless work of the dedicated staff
and volunteers in my district and in our province to the most vulnerable in our
society.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Placentia West - Bellevue.
MR. DWYER:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Today, I
speak of a remarkable young man from my District of Placentia West - Bellevue:
Blake Colbran, a youth who beautifully represents the Town of Marystown. Blake
has strived through more personal hardship then should be allocated to any
person, and has done so with a soaring attitude.
Blake
has most recently received the Horatio Alger Scholarship. This scholarship is
awarded to full-time students in their final year of high school with financial
challenges and who have demonstrated integrity and perseverance in overcoming
adversity, a commitment to pursue a post-secondary education, a desire to
contribute to society and a good academic record. Blake has most deservingly
received $5,000 to assist with his academic studies.
Mr.
Speaker, this is not all that Blake has received. Blake is also the recipient of
the Joyce Family Foundation bursary, a bursary which is endowed upon students
enrolled in full-time studies of a recognized college or university in Canada,
which are based on financial need and to increase the participation of
disadvantaged or at-risk youth who face obstacles and barriers to a
post-secondary education. Blake has received a $20,000 bursary to assist in his
studies.
I would
like this hon. house to show their appreciation and give praise to such an
outstanding accomplishment of Mr. Blake Colbran. He is a man that definitely has
a bright future ahead of him.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for Burin
- Grand Bank with leave.
MS. HALEY:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
It is
with a heavy heart I speak today of a devastating loss, not only to the Town of
St. Lawrence but the province as a whole.
On May
25, the fishing vessel the Sarah Anne ,
with crew members Eddie Joe, Scott and Jody Norman and Isaac Kettle, left port
for the fishing grounds. Tragically, it would be their last trip and four of St.
Lawrence's fine citizens taken by the sea.
While
the bodies of Eddie Joe, Scott and Jody were soon recovered, and despite long
days of searching and heartache, it wasn't until June 6 that Isaac's body was
recovered and brought back home. We are so thankful to those who searched and
offered closure.
Mr.
Speaker, another
chapter written in St. Lawrence's long history of tragedy as
generations of native sons and daughters have taken to the sea or gone
underground to earn a living, too often with tragic results.
St.
Lawrence is grieving, and the grieving of one is the grieving of all. As is
their custom, the good people of St. Lawrence have come together to comfort and
support the families.
I ask
all hon. Members to keep the Norman and Kettle families in their thoughts and
prayers, and pray also for those who “go to the sea in ships, that do business
in great waters.”
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
Statements by Ministers.
Statements by
Ministers
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Service NL.
MR. OSBORNE:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Saturday, June 20, officially marks the first day of summer. Throughout the
season, thousands of motorists will travel over our provincial roadways to enjoy
all that our province has to offer.
As the
province continues to learn and live with COVID-19 and as residents travel and
vacation at home this summer, I strongly encourage all motorists to keep the
following simple rules top of mind so we can avoid senseless tragedies on our
highways.
Don't
drink and drive. Don't use your cellphone while driving and don't text and
drive. Adhere to posted speed limits, slow down in construction zones and make
sure you reduce your speed when roads are wet or during foggy conditions. Wear
your seat belt. Stay alert and do not drive fatigued or distracted. It almost
seems too silly to mention, Mr. Speaker, but I think it's important to remind
people.
Mr.
Speaker, this is also an important time to remind all Newfoundlanders and
Labradorians that it is illegal to operate any type of motorized vehicle if your
ability to drive is impaired by alcohol or drugs.
Last
year, motor vehicle collisions claimed approximately 2,000 lives in Canada,
between five and six people a day. In addition, almost 10,000 more were
seriously injured. Most of these collisions were preventable.
Public
safety is a top priority for government and we will continue to make
improvements in the Highway Traffic Act
to help make our roads and highways safer.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Ferryland.
MR. O'DRISCOLL:
I thank the minister for an
advance copy of his statement.
Mr.
Speaker, to hear that 2,000 people lost their lives and 10,000 others were
injured in collisions in our country last year is distressing. To know that most
of these collisions were preventable makes it more sad and senseless.
It is
often said that road safety is a shared responsibility. Mr. Speaker, as people
start getting back on the roads in our province, we must be mindful of our safe
driving practices, of others using the roadways and, of course, weather and road
conditions.
Mr.
Speaker, safety should be everyone's priority. I encourage all those using our
roads – motorists, construction crews, cyclists, runners and pedestrians – to
stay safe.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Labrador West.
MR. BROWN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and I
thank the minister for an advance copy of his statement.
I join
with the minister in recommending and reminding people to stay safe on the
provincial highways this summer. I would also advise people to make sure they
stay aware of our road conditions, watch out for moose and other wildlife on the
highways and avoid, if possible, driving at night.
In the
summer of the COVID pandemic, government is advising people to take a
staycation. An excellent idea, but when rediscovering our beautiful province,
stay safe and keep your eyes on the road.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
Further statements by
ministers?
The hon.
the Minister of Tourism, Culture, Industry and Innovation.
MR. DAVIS:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I rise
in this hon. House to encourage all residents to vacation in our beautiful
province this summer as we continue to learn to live with COVID-19.
restrictions have eased, the call to action is simple, to get out and explore
the place we love and call home.
In the
very near future, we will be launching our new marketing campaign, one that is
about our unparalleled pride of this place. Our heart swells when we talk about
home, which is more than just a house and family – it's a place, it's a state of
mind. And for us, it's the entire province.
discover more about the unique story of our home, I urge travellers to consider
experiencing our many hiking and walking trails, parks and museums. Discover one
of our 11 provincial historic sites opening in July, or learn more about those
local registered attractions and experiences at one of our six Visitor
Information Centres opening this month.
Mr.
Speaker, by vacationing in our province, we are supporting hard hit, registered
tourism businesses such as attractions, craft shops, restaurants and licensed
accommodators. These businesses and their employees are our friends, our
neighbours and our families. They connect us to this place, our roots and to our
culture. And this summer they need our help. To learn more about these
businesses that are registered and licensed in our province, please visit:
newfoundlandlabrador.com.
encourage everyone to start making their vacation at home plans, because like so
many in this province, there's no place I would rather be than here in
Newfoundland and Labrador.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for Terra
Nova.
MR. PARROTT:
Mr. Speaker, I'd like to
thank the minister for an advance copy of his statement.
Mr.
Speaker, this summer I will be vacationing in our province, and I look forward
to exploring many coves and communities to which I've never visited before.
I'm
happy to hear that the department will be launching a new staycation marking
plan; however, I suggest to the minister that this campaign should have been
launched weeks ago. As people plan their vacations in advance, I worry that this
announcement may be a little too late for the industry.
Mr.
Speaker, our tourism industry is in trouble because of this public health
pandemic. The industry's activities for the season have been severely and
negatively impacted and it is unknown how the tourism market will respond next
year. For these reasons, I believe the Premier needs to make an announcement
regarding the Atlantic tourism bubble sooner rather than later.
If our
province is to be a part of it, our tourism operators need to market their
establishments in other Atlantic provinces now to prompt people to come visit us
this summer and to bring revenue into our province.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Labrador West.
MR. BROWN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I, too,
thank the minister for an advance copy of his statement.
marketing plan will be a great boost for many businesses that rely on tourism.
Hopefully, the plan will encourage more people from the Island to travel to
Labrador.
All
Labradorians have been to Newfoundland, but most Newfoundland residents have
never been to Labrador. This is a good time to come see the historic communities
and breathtaking scenery of the Big Land.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
Further statements by
ministers?
The hon.
the Minister of Transportation and Works.
MR. CROCKER:
Mr. Speaker, it gives me pleasure today to inform this hon. House of recent
actions taken by the department to make highways safer for children, parents and
teachers walking on provincial roads in school zones.
Earlier
this week, digital speed signs that display the speed of motorists travelling
over the speed limit and warns them to slow down began being installed in school
zones on provincial roads. As of today, 10 signs have been installed and by the
end of August we anticipate that 165 signs will be installed in 81 schools
zones. Mr. Speaker, in addition to showing speed and issuing a warning, the
digital signs also display a second flashing message to motorists travelling in
excess of 10 kilometers above the speed limit.
These
signs are similar to those you may have seen in school zones on municipal roads.
We have also been using them on some highways in our province and we know they
are quite effective in promoting highway safety and reminding motorists to slow
down.
Mr.
Speaker, we want to thank the Department of Education and Early Childhood
Development and the province's school districts for their work on this
initiative. This initiative will now lead to a safer environment for everyone
walking in school zones. However, we will also take this opportunity to remind
motorists that it is important to drive responsibly and cautiously, and
encourage all motorists to pay attention to all signs and slow down on all of
our highways.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Conception Bay South.
MR. PETTEN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I thank
the minister for an advance copy of his statement. Mr. Speaker, I have said many
times before, we welcome and support all initiatives that increase road safety
for all individuals using our roadways. Children and others walking to and from
school can be some of the most vulnerable.
Digital
display speed signs can be very useful tools, and we are certainly glad to see
the government finally taking advantage of this technology in installing these
signs in the school zones throughout our province. Mr. Speaker, while we are
pleased to see these measures to help ensure the safety of our children, we
would also encourage government to look at some other initiatives, such as the
1.6 busing policy and speed limit reduction signs in all school zones across the
province.
I would
like to make this point on our last day before the summer. I've lobbied for this
for several years and the minister can attest to it. I believe we should have
reduced speed limits on all provincial roads that run in school zones. We don't.
It's not a policy and I call on government to change that.
Thank
you very much.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Labrador West.
MR. BROWN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and I
thank the minister for an advance copy of the statement.
welcome the installation of more digital signs in school zones. It's a great
first step forward.
When
schools are located on our highways every effort should be made to ensure that
our students are safe going and coming from schools, whether they are walking on
the shoulder or trying to cross the highway. I advise all motorists to heed
these signs to ensure they slow down in school zones. Safety of our children is
the highest priority and initiatives like this increase safety, so let's do more
like this.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
Further statements by
ministers?
Oral
Questions.
Oral Questions
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Leader of the
Official Opposition.
MR. CROSBIE:
Mr. Speaker, in a statement
yesterday, Dominion Bond Rating said that in the absence of a fiscal and
economic update and uncertainty about federal support, a negative trend on
long-term bond ratings is warranted.
Has this
helped the government to beat a retreat on the increase in judges' pay?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Justice and Public Safety.
MR. A. PARSONS:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
As the
Member should know, that would have absolutely nothing to do with the resolution
that has been tabled and reported to this House. What has been done here is not
only constitutionally required, it's statutorily required, so that's what we've
done here. As the Member should know, that would have no consideration in the
decisions that have been made, especially by the tribunal, which again had this
evidence some time ago.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Leader of the
Official Opposition.
MR. CROSBIE:
Mr. Speaker, thank you.
emergency physician told me the department doesn't know what happened to all the
heart attacks over the last three months.
Does the
Minister of Health have an estimate of excess heart- and stroke-related deaths
during the lockdown?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Health and Community Services.
MR. HAGGIE:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker, a very important question around care not related to COVID-19.
I'm
pleased to be able to report to the House that over the period up to the middle
of May through COVID there were no deaths on the cardiac wait-list at all, Mr.
Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Leader of the
Official Opposition.
MR. CROSBIE:
I thank the minister for that
partial glimpse into the question because it refers to the wait-list.
I was in
the Health Sciences as a designated visitor last weekend and a surgeon told me a
patient died that morning before they could complete the COVID protocol and give
crash therapy. The surgeon also thought there's no evidence of virus in the
province and the continued lockdown contributed to the death.
What
does the minister have to say to the family of a deceased person such as this?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Health and Community Services.
MR. HAGGIE:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker.
The
issue of managing acute health care during a pandemic like this has challenged
us in ways that we have not been used to. Quite frankly, the protocols that are
in place are based on public health and infection and prevention control advice.
As the situation has improved across the province in terms of prevalence of the
disease, those changes, those restrictions, those requirements for PPE and
changes in the way business is done are slowly being relaxed. As of next week,
we will be back to pretty well routine activities in the health care system, the
only caveat being to preserve some beds in case of a surge.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Conception Bay South.
MR. PETTEN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Trades
NL have said that a staggering 90 per cent of their 18,000 members are without
work, while outside workers continue to work on the Core Science building at
MUN, Corner Brook hospital and long-term care facilities in Central
Newfoundland.
Why is
the government continuing to sit on their hands while much-needed jobs are going
to outside workers?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Transportation and Works.
MR. CROCKER:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker, and I thank the hon. Member for the question.
We're
not sitting on our hands. We have done more, I would say, in actually monitoring
work job sites in this province over the last number of years than any other
jurisdictions or any other government in the past, Mr. Speaker.
Currently, there are 95 per cent of the employees on these projects in this
province from the province. There are 371 people right now working on TW
projects in this province; 353 of them are actually from the province. I've
talked to Mr. King at Trades NL as recently as yesterday. We're seeing some new
language since COVID coming in from other jurisdictions when it comes
trade-related issues around workers and we're exploring that information along
with Trades NL and Mr. King. We look forward to continuing that conversation,
Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Conception Bay South.
MR. PETTEN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
That's
not new news. We spoke about this in the House last month. Your actions need to
match your words, Mr. Speaker, and in this case his inaction is deafening.
The
minister continues to make excuses for government's inactions in the past.
Will the
minister stand with our caucus and Trades NL and commit here and now to a local
hiring policy on all future government infrastructure projects?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Transportation and Works.
MR. CROCKER:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker, and again I thank the hon. Member for the question.
You can
see the actions that this government has taken. Just recently my colleague the
Minister of Service NL brought in the procurement regulations with a 10 per cent
buffer for Newfoundland and Labrador companies, Mr. Speaker. The reality is here
– and I've had this conversation with my colleague the Minister of Service NL
and others – if we're going to be giving buffers or additional room for
companies in this province, we expect them to be hiring Newfoundland and
Labrador workers, 100 per cent. That is something we're looking at. We're
reviewing legislation right now.
Mr.
Speaker, when you think about mobility in a workforce, as Newfoundlanders and
Labradorians we've benefited, I guess, for generation after generation of
mobility. We don't want to be putting up walls that eliminate mobility, but I
can tell you one thing, as we see challenges around mobility in other provinces,
we will certainly follow suit with as strong or stronger rules.
Thank
you very much, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for Grand
Falls-Windsor - Buchans.
MR. TIBBS:
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
Mr.
Speaker, let's bring this back to the ground roots. This government prides
itself on having 95 per cent of their work done locally. The 5 per cent work
done by outside workers in Grand Falls-Windsor long-term health care centre are
plumbers and sheet-metal workers.
I ask
the minister: Do we not have enough out-of-work plumbers and sheet-metal workers
in this province, and what is your message to them?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Transportation and Works.
MR. CROCKER:
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
Any time
we see these numbers we actually go back to the companies and inquire why we see
that. There is a variety of reasons. We don't appreciate or we don't want people
coming in from other provinces. Again, Mr. Speaker, I think the Member behind me
would actually be somebody who, from what I know, has been a worker that's
benefited from worker mobility within our country. It's something we've long had
in this country. It runs with our trade agreements in this country and lots of
times there are provinces out there, and jurisdictions, that want to talk about
increasing worker mobility.
We want
to be able to have a mobile workforce, but we will take the actions necessary to
make sure that Newfoundlander and Labradorians are the ones – of all the
policies I've reviewed in this country, Mr. Speaker, I have not seen one yet
that would get us close to a 95 per cent Newfoundland and Labrador component in
the work sites.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Topsail - Paradise.
MR. P. DINN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
continue to hear from constituents who are substitute teachers who feel
forgotten by this government. Since Snowmageddon and COVID-19 many have not
worked since Christmas and many are now looking outside the province for
employment opportunities.
The
minister has spoken to school starting in the fall with split classes and
staggered learning.
I ask
the responsible minister: Does he see us as having enough staff to do so?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Education and Early Childhood Development.
MR. WARR:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I'd
certainly like to address the Member's concerns with regard to substitute
teachers. As I've said in this House several times, it's not lost on me the
importance of substitute teachers. They play a huge
part in the educational
system here in Newfoundland and Labrador.
Just
this morning I had the opportunity, again, to address the issue with my MP, in
my particular part of the district, Mr. Speaker, the issue of substitute
teachers which I review with him each and every week.
Mr.
Speaker, this is not only a Newfoundland and Labrador issue, this is an issue
right across the country and I will continue to do what I can, Mr. Speaker, to
make sure that the word is out on substitute teachers. We'll continue to work
with our federal partners on developing a program to help them.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Ferryland.
MR. O'DRISCOLL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I'm
getting many calls from harvesters in my district who are still without any
details on critical programs announced by the federal government to provide
assistance. There's been no response from the federal MPs.
Minister, will you intervene to get these answers, these critical details, so
the harvesters can access these programs?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Fisheries and Land Resources.
MR. BYRNE:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker.
This is
a really important question and it's one of the reasons why I continue to meet
with the federal minister on a weekly basis to discuss not only the issues of
harvesters but plant workers and plant owners. There have been a number of
federal programs that have been initiated, which will be of great assistance to
our industry and to the national industry, but what I am most focused on is
making sure that our provincial harvesters, plant workers and plant owners have
access to these programs.
I was
one of the first to highlight the fact that in the federal government's program
for harvesters, plant workers were totally exempt. There was no direction or no
strategy in place for plant workers. I'm assured that when it comes to plant
workers, there will be a program, but, Mr. Speaker, I'm keeping the federal
government's feet to the fire on this. We need a program for our industry, it is
too important for each and every one of us.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Harbour Main.
MS. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Mr. Speaker, last
fall the Minister of AESL was found guilty of gross mismanagement with
taxpayers' dollars, yet he was allowed to remain in Cabinet. On the other hand,
the Minister of Service NL's position in Cabinet was vacated, based on an
allegation.
I ask
the Premier: Why the double standard?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Premier.
PREMIER BALL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
double standard, the report was issued to the House of Assembly to be dealt
with, in the first instance that the Member speaks about, and that issue was
dealt with in the House of Assembly through the normal processes, and the
apology and the recommendations of what led to the address to this House. That
was all carried out by the minister that she speaks about. I'm surprised that
she would bring that up since she was part of those discussions.
The
second instance that we talk about, it was a much different situation, Mr.
Speaker. As you know, I'm not going to get into the details of this. It's all on
public record.
Right
now, once the issue and the investigation has been dealt with and the decision,
Mr. Speaker, will be made by me. I made it quite clear if this investigation
that we're talking about clears the individual then she would go back into
Cabinet.
It's
unfortunate that needs to be raised (inaudible).
MR. SPEAKER:
The time is expired for an
answer.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Harbour Main.
MS. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Yes, Mr. Speaker,
we're very well aware of the report, but I don't think the Premier understood
the question.
The
evidence was unequivocal of an ethical misconduct by one minister, yet he was
kept in Cabinet. The Premier had a choice, but he readily accepted the
resignation of a female Cabinet minister who had an accusation – no finding of
guilt against her.
Again, I
ask the question: Why the double standard?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Premier.
PREMIER BALL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Once
again I think in all actual fact what we're seeing here – and the Member is
quite clear, given her background and knowledge of what would happen in these
investigations. I'm not here to get into the details of this. I'm sure this is
probably something that the Member opposite would like to see happen, but that
would be breaking a number of privacy rules and a number of questions around
transparency.
I can't
imagine that someone who sits on the other side of the House in Opposition
today, especially a woman, would want me to actually be publicly disclosing
what's happening.
As I
said quite clearly, there is no double standard here. In one case, the report
was given to this House, it was given to this House to be dealt with. It was
dealt with.
Secondly, on the other investigation, once that's dealt with, as Premier of this
province, I will make that decision and I will make it then quite clear.
I've
already said if the investigation is cleared, the Member would be back in
Cabinet.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Harbour Main.
MS. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Mr. Speaker, as
critic for the Status of Women I have rights to ask these important questions.
There is a real perception of gender bias in this government, and the Premier
needs to address those concerns by the public.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Premier.
PREMIER BALL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Well, I
would be very clear in my position as Premier, since I'm the only Premier in
this country, the only jurisdiction in this country that has set aside a
department clearly and exclusively dedicated to issues around the status of
women.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
PREMIER BALL:
So if there is a bias that
the Member opposite is referring to, it's bias to make sure that we get more
women in leadership roles. I would say, Mr. Speaker, we need more of that and I
would expect all Members of the House to actually support this initiative. In a
year or so, whenever that is, we're going to see more people step up for
leadership. I hope there's a lot more women in the next Assembly in this House
of Assembly.
There
will be one seat that will be vacant in my own district that I hope some woman
steps up to run for.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Harbour Main.
MS. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Again, Mr.
Speaker, as critic for the Status of Women, I asked the question why there are
not more women running for politics and for public office.
I wonder
if that will increase when we have the Premier not answering the direct
questions about perceived bias in the government with respect to gender.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Premier.
PREMIER BALL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Well,
the questions early on with this ongoing question and answer period was directed
to me, so it's only fair that when the questions are directed to me, that I
would answer them. I think the Member clearly understands that because it was
her words.
For me
right now, Mr. Speaker, I'll do whatever I can, while my time in politics, and
even after in an elected role, to promote more women in leadership. I would ask
you, just go look at my own business experience and you will find out that the
majority of the people that were working in any of the businesses that I've
operated in the past or any of the organizations that I work with, far outweighs
the number of women in leadership roles.
I would
suggest to the Member opposite to go look at the key leaders that we have in
government right now and you will see we have put an emphasis on making sure
that we have more women in leadership roles in this province, Mr. Speaker.
Our
records speak for themselves. I would suggest, look around your own caucus and
you can ask yourself the very same question.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Stephenville - Port au Port.
MR. WAKEHAM:
Mr. Speaker, earlier in his
answer to one of my colleagues, the Minister of Health alluded to the potential
for the health care system to get back to normal with the new Alert Level, but
this time of year is normally a time of year when regional health authorities
actually close beds to allow for staff to take much-needed vacations.
I ask
the minister: Are the regional health authorities planning on bed closures this
summer, and will the dedicated health care workers get their vacation they so
desperately need?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Health and Community Services.
MR. HAGGIE:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker.
I would
use this opportunity just to, once again, thank the health care workers of this
province for what they have done above and beyond over the last little while.
The
Member with his background raises a very important point. We have a balance here
between the needs of a backlog and wait-lists and the usual expectation of
family vacation time as schools finish and we enter the summer. That has been a
topic of discussion with the regional health authorities and will continue to be
so. It will be informed, I think, by my discussions next week with the Medical
Association and the CEOs.
Somewhere in the middle is a balance to make sure that we have healthy,
well-rested staff and yet deal with the issues the people of this province face
with health care.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Stephenville - Port au Port.
MR. WAKEHAM:
Yes, Mr. Speaker, we have been told here that the actual return to normality for
people on those wait-lists that have been cancelled could take up to 18 months.
I ask
the minister: Is that true, that it could be up to 18 months before we actually
take care of the backlog? If so, what will you do to speed that up?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Health and Community Services.
MR. HAGGIE:
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
I have
not been given a figure by the regional health authorities. We, indeed, are
still in discussions as the bulk of the wait-lists material is actually held in
certain areas in private physicians' offices. The next key, sort of education
piece from my point of view, would be to get hold of that through the NLMA in my
meeting next week. Thereafter, we would be in a better position to assess the
magnitude of the backlog.
At the
moment, we cannot put a time frame on when it's going to be cleared up, and 18
months is a figure that seems to have just appeared out of the ether. I haven't
heard that.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Torngat Mountains.
MS. EVANS:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
district and all of Labrador has suffered the effects of systemic racism;
systemic harming all aspects of quality of life including our health care. COVID
has exposed the impacts of this systemic racism, denying access to essential
services. Our people often have to wait years to see the right specialist and
then receive the proper treatment. Now, they are waiting with no word when their
surgeries will be rescheduled; life-saving surgeries in a lot of the times.
I'm
asking: Mr. Minister, do you support this lack of communication?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Health and Community Services.
MR. HAGGIE:
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
We have,
over my mandate, made really concerted efforts, which I think quite frankly have
been appreciated by the Indigenous groups with whom I've met, to incorporate
traditional knowledge, traditional healing into, particularly, our mental health
and addictions work. I think that's an example of how we can and should do
business going forward.
Urgent
cases have been dealt with as they arose. Elective cases are going to be
contacted as part of Level 2, which I have now been told will be next week.
If the
Member has any specific challenges with one of her constituents, I'd be only too
happy to look into it for her, but this should start to ease up over the next
little while, Mr. Speaker, with Level 2.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for Terra
Nova.
MR. PARROTT:
Mr. Speaker, I've been bombarded by calls from seniors in my district and
families who can't get home support assessments for personal care homes or home
support.
I ask
the minister: What is the plan to speed up this backlog?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Health and Community Services.
MR. HAGGIE:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker.
With the
move to Level 3, the backlog is being addressed. Urgent placements continued
throughout the pandemic and were not interrupted. And as Level 2 comes, these
assessments will become more and more frequent. A lot of the preliminary work
can actually now, because of some changes, take place virtually or by phone if
we can organize that, bearing in mind the challenges of the individuals
concerned.
This is
work that will come with the transition from Level 3 to Level 2 and is
anticipated to start fully next week, Mr. Speaker.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Bonavista.
MR. PARDY:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
On May
7, I communicated to Health and Community Services about a constituent who was
diagnosed with breast cancer a year ago. She had surgery and her one-year post
mammogram was scheduled for April past but was postponed due to COVID. In
addition, a consult with a specialist regarding nodules found on her thyroid was
also postponed.
Can the
minister provide more exact information as to when these backlog assessments
will be addressed?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Health and Community Services.
MR. HAGGIE:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker.
Obviously, I can only speak in generalities with that level of detail. Urgent
mammograms, for example, continued throughout COVID. This would have been an
issue of communication between the primary care provider and the radiologist.
Again,
consults continue to be received. These were looked at by the specialist and
prioritized. If they were urgent they could go ahead. If not, they were
deferred, and the deferred ones were being checked, I am told, on a regular
basis to make sure that anything of priority did not slip; as what may not have
been urgent in May, would become urgent in June.
Those
kind of situations, I am informed, were being examined regularly, Mr. Speaker.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Placentia West - Bellevue.
MR. DWYER:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Minister, I know of a middle-aged, single dad that has been waiting for the
removal of a lump since February. There are concerns that the lump could be
cancerous.
What
assurances can you give that person and his young family as to when he can
expect this surgery in a timely manner?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Health and Community Services.
MR. HAGGIE:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker.
These
are concerns of a general kind that have been brought to the department.
Essentially, this is a matter for discussion between the primary care provider,
the patient and the specialist. If this was deemed urgent, it would go ahead; if
it is deemed of a more routine nature, these will start in Level 3 and increase
in volume in Level 2.
If there
are any concerns about a particular individual, this should be conveyed to the
primary care provider and thence to the specialist and it will be dealt with on
the basis of clinical need, not administrative expediency.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for Mount
Pearl North.
MR. LESTER:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Minister, prior to COVID, we had a health care system in crisis; now it's in
tatters. Many residents in my district have contacted me to raise concerns about
wait times for needed prescriptions for rheumatoid arthritis, blood tests and
many other progressive medical concerns. These are health requirements that
cannot be delayed.
What
confidence can you give the residents that these time-sensitive services will be
fast tracked?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Health and Community Services.
MR. HAGGIE:
The Member opposite raises
two really important issues and I'm going to deal with the first.
I reject
utterly the concept that the health care system is in tatters. That is an insult
– it really is – to the people who have worked long and hard to keep this system
amongst the best in Canada. Look around you and see what's happened out there.
We have had the lowest hospitalization rates for COVID, we have had the lowest
ICU rates for COVID and we have had the lowest death rates for COVID of a lot of
jurisdictions, and it is not in tatters.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Leader of the
Third Party.
MS. COFFIN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
For the
benefit of ministers today, all our questions can be answered with a simple –
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
The hon.
the Leader of the Third Party.
MS. COFFIN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
For the
benefit of ministers today, all our questions can be answered with a simple yes
or no.
I ask
the Minister of Labour: Will he work with the Federation of Labour to make the
changes to labour standards and workers' compensation legislation stipulated by
the federal government as a condition of their budgetary contribution to our
province?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Advanced Education, Skills and Labour.
MR. MITCHELMORE:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and I
thank the Member opposite for the question.
We work
very closely with the Federation of Labour. I actually have a meeting with the
president again tomorrow as part of a routine discussion that we have on
important matters of labour here in this province. The federal government has
identified paid sick leave as something that they would like to pursue and
that's of provincial jurisdiction.
We will
continue to have dialogue with the stakeholders on this particular matter and
look forward to all of the dialogue. Whenever we talk about labour matters, it's
very important that we always balance the employee and employer relationship.
Thank
you for the question today.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Labrador West.
MR. BROWN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I ask
the Minister of Labour: Will he protect our workers from multinational
companies' union-busting tactics to bring forward anti-replacement worker
legislation?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Advanced Education, Skills and Labour.
MR. MITCHELMORE:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I thank
the Member opposite for the question when it comes to labour legislation that we
would have here in this particular province.
understand that as responsible for the Labour Relations Agency, whenever there
are matters and whenever there are disputes when it comes to labour, we would be
able to provide support when it comes to mediation and conciliation services
here in this province. And we continue to offer those services to the people
today as they would need it.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for St.
John's Centre.
MR. J. DINN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr.
Speaker, substitute teachers are a vital part of our education system. They are
also a vulnerable group of professionals who depend on schools being open to
earn a living. The suspension of in-class instruction has placed them at
financial risk and may cause some of them to consider leaving the profession.
I ask
the Minister of Education and Early Childhood Development: Will he put in
supports to keep substitute teachers in the profession so that our education
system will continue to function efficiently?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Education and Early Childhood Development.
MR. WARR:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and I
thank the hon. Member for his questions and his concerns with substitute
teachers.
As I've
previously said, Mr. Speaker, that is not lost me. It's not lost on the
education system here within Newfoundland and Labrador. It's not lost on the
district as well. And certainly, as I said earlier, we've had discussions with
our federal colleagues. I've had additional discussions with members of CMEC.
This is not only a provincial issue, this is a national issue, and it's one that
I hope we can get cleared up really soon.
Mr.
Speaker, it's our intention to have students back with full class instruction in
September and substitute teachers will be a big part of that going forward.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for St.
John's Centre.
MR. J. DINN:
Mr. Speaker, the Inuit
Bachelor of Education is an exemplar of a true partnership between the
Nunatsiavut Government and the MUN Faculty of Education.
I ask
the Minister of Advanced Education, Skills and Labour: Will his department
encourage the development of programs similar to the IBED program for other
Indigenous groups to promote reconciliation and empowerment?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Premier.
PREMIER BALL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I think
it's appropriate – this will probably be my last answer as Premier of the
province – to speak to the importance of Indigenous education, Mr. Speaker, in
all aspects in our education process, either the K-12 system, where the
Premier's Task Force on
Improving Educational Outcomes and then the action plan subsequent to that
made it a priority to make sure that in our K-to-12 system that we would include
Indigenous education, also as multiculturalism – so a big focus on that within
the department.
Also in
post-secondary, Mr. Speaker, I know in the past days speaking with the previous
president as well as speaking with the incoming president, the importance in
post-secondary education, making sure that we include Indigenous issues.
It's
critical to reconciliation. It's an action that I can tell you as this Premier
and incoming premiers and this government will take very seriously and make sure
and commit that it will be included in all aspects of our education.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Leader of the
Third Party.
MS. COFFIN:
These are yes or no. I have
three; let's see how quickly we can go.
Mr.
Speaker, form is as important as function, so I ask the Ministers of
Transportation and Works and Tourism, Culture, Industry and Innovation will they
work with our many talented local artists on the design of public buildings,
spaces and infrastructure.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Premier.
PREMIER BALL:
Thank you – this might be my last one.
As part
of making sure that we include parts of our history and our culture, I think we
have a responsibility to make sure that we include that in all aspects of
buildings that we will actually construct in Newfoundland and Labrador. You
would actually see that if you go into the new long-term care centre in Corner
Brook, it speaks to this very issue.
Mr.
Speaker, this is a government that makes sure that we include all the things
that are important in our past and present into new building designs.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The time for Question Period
has expired.
Presenting Reports by Standing and Select Committees.
Tabling
of Documents.
Notices
of Motion.
Answers
to Questions for which Notice has been Given.
Petitions.
Petitions
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Opposition House
Leader.
MR. BRAZIL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The
reason for this petition and the background of the petition is as follows: On
July 19, 2018, Eastern Health announced that the services offered at the
Portugal Cove-St. Philip's Community Health Clinic would be relocated to Major's
Path Clinic, with the transition expected to be completed September 30, 2018.
The
Portugal Cove Community Health Clinic has provided public health services for
decades and is the only clinic in Portugal Cove-St. Philip's, a town of nearly
10,000 residents.
The
clinic provides direct health care programs and services to the town on a daily
basis and addresses the vital and growing needs for community health services,
particularly for the increasing youth and aged population of Portugal Cove-St.
Philip's.
Therefore we petition the hon. House of Assembly as follows: We, the
undersigned, call upon the House of Assembly to urge the Government of
Newfoundland and Labrador to take immediate action to ensure that the services
currently offered at Portugal Cove-St. Philip's and that those services that
were to be put to Major's Path would stay in Portugal Cove-St. Philip's.
Mr.
Speaker, we lobbied consistently – and this petition has over 3,000 names to it
– to have the services not depleted within the community because of the need for
the population and because our understanding from Eastern Health and all the
regional health authorities would be about providing services in the
communities. It would be a better return on the investment. It would be better
to get a gauge on the needs of the community.
Mr.
Speaker, after lobbying and protesting – and I met personally with the CEO and
the chair of the regional health board – we did get an understanding that there
would be a scaled-back clinic, and I mean an extremely scaled-back clinic, that
would be temporary until we got to a point where we could then bring back the
other services with some enhanced services. We went to the regional health
authorities' AGM and had the CEO on record, in an interview with NTV,
acknowledged that Portugal Cove-St. Philip's would be one of the integral parts
of how they expand community health services.
Mr.
Speaker, 18 months later we were hoodwinked. It's not very often that you will
find the Member for Conception Bay East - Bell Island or, I would say, the mayor
of Portugal Cove-St. Philip's get hoodwinked. But we have come to an agreement;
both of us got hoodwinked and so did the residents of Portugal Cove-St.
Philip's, because not only do we not even have the small, one-room clinic that
did very minor interventions, because of the nature of that – the health
professionals would have to leave Major's Path, come down. It was more of a
holdover closet, as we called it.
The fact
of the matter is, during the COVID even those services are now not being
offered. We are now lobbying. We're adamant and we were very open to having
dialogue. There's a committee set up where Eastern Health comes down, but while
I compliment the health professionals, the individuals who are facilitating this
process, we know it's a stall tactic. We have no idea why this process was taken
away.
We were
first told it was a savings of $100,000. When I sought it with some financial
people and we did the cost analysis, we realized it's going to cost $10,000 more
because we were led to believe that they owned the building that they were in.
Since then we found out they lease.
They
could've leased a building in Portugal Cove-St. Philip's, where they were, much
less than what the original cost was. The cost of a health professional's
transportation to and from Major's Path to Portugal Cove-St. Philip's adds up.
Not counting the 40 minutes that's lost in that transportation time. It's
costly.
So, Mr.
Speaker, this is not acceptable. We're asking that somebody step in, either
through the Minister of Health, to Eastern Health to say you have a better way
to offer health services in Portugal Cove-St. Philip's and you can still save
the taxpayers' money.
We will
bring this adamantly to the House of Assembly until we get restitution of those
programs.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Humber - Bay of Islands.
MR. JOYCE:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I'm
going to present a petition on behalf of the residents of Route 450 in Humber -
Bay of Islands. I was a bit late in getting the petition in. I want to thank the
Clerk for allowing me to present the petition a bit later.
Mr.
Speaker, as people know, we had the major flood back in 2018, January 2018, and
there was a lot of work that needed to be done. There was one bridge that was
done. There is a second one, Cammies Brook Bridge, now being completed.
Mr.
Speaker, I just want to recognize the Minister of Transportation and Works who,
yesterday, as I asked a question, received notification from the federal
government that the rural and northern fund has been approved and there will be
major improvements to Route 450. There'll be work around Mount Moriah, 1.2 km;
Halfway Point, 1.1; John's Beach and Bennett's Cove, 2.9; Frenchman's Cove,
there's 0.2; Blow Me Down Brook; Copper Mine Brook; and Route 450 from O'Connell
Drive to Allen's Road and in Lewin Parkway.
I know
it's been a struggle for myself and the minister working with the federal
government. I have to recognize that the minister sometimes got frustrated with
me, but he kept at it and there will be major improvements in the Route 450
since the flood. There is major work that needs to be done, but this work will
take care of the major safety concerns in the district. I know the minister is
looking at if there is any way something for Lark Harbour – no guarantees, but
looking at what the cost comes in as.
I just
have to recognize that, and to the residents, I know you're a bit frustrated
with some of the work, but it takes time when you're doing your bridges and
there's extensive work done on the bridges.
Mr.
Speaker, I just have to recognize the Member for Conception Bay East - Bell
Island who did the major bridge around Cook's Brook about three years ago. That
was a major improvement for the area for safety concerns also. I just have to
recognize that.
I'll
just say to the minister: thanks for working with me. I know sometimes I
frustrated you. Sometimes I'm noted to keep on an issue until I get good
answers, but the roads in the Humber - Bay of Islands this summer will be much
safer. I just have to recognize the minister for the work that he did on it.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Transportation and Works with a reply to that petition.
MR. CROCKER:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker.
I thank
the hon. Member for the petition. That's a good petition.
Mr.
Speaker, I just want to take a few moments, just because of my ability to
respond here actually, to send a thank you to the Department of Transportation
and Works. Our engineering staff in the challenges – and all of our staff in the
challenges – that we've seen in the past few months have done an outstanding
job, from our security guards to our people working around the building, people
working on our ferries and in our depots. I'm going to miss somebody in the
department because there are 1,800 different people.
employees really stepped up during COVID and stayed on the job when a lot of
people weren't able to come to work. I want to thank them for the work that
they've done.
We have
a tremendous Roads Plan this year for the circumstances that we find ourselves
under. We have work on Route 60, work on Route 10, 450, 430, 75, 210, 220 and
90. Mr. Speaker, for the type of year we're going through – and our road
building industry for the work that they're out starting to do.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Conception Bay South.
MR. PETTEN:
Three times is the charm.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr.
Speaker, these are the reasons for the petition:
WHEREAS
the individual residents and municipal leaders, including the Joint Council of
Conception Bay North, have spoken to deplorable road conditions in the District
of Harbour Main; and
WHEREAS
the district is made up of smaller communities like the towns of Holyrood, Upper
Gullies, Seal Cove, Cupids, Colliers, South River, North River, Roaches Line and
Makinsons who have roads in desperate need of repair or paving; and
WHEREAS
these roads see a high volume of traffic flow almost every day and drivers can
expect potholes, severe rutting, limited shoulders and many washed-out areas
along the way;
THEREFORE we petition the hon. House of Assembly to take immediate steps to
repair and repave these important roadways and ensure the safety of the driving
public who use them on a regular basis.
This
petition is not directly regarding my district itself, but it is part of CBS
included in these roads I listed. Most of my residents drive these roads. I
drive these roads. The Member for Harbour Main drives these roads. People from
CBS contact me about these roads. The Minister of Transportation drives these
roads. The Member for Harbour Grace - Port de Grave drives these roads. We all
drive these roads, Mr. Speaker.
Part of
the reason – and it kind of spurred me to want to present this petition – the
Member for Harbour Main sat in her place the other day and read a petition
similar to this. The minister took it upon himself to stay back on and never
answered it. They're people in your district, your colleague from Harbour Grace
- Port de Grave's District, Harbour Main District, CBS District. Give an answer.
People deserve an answer. It's not about politics all the time, Minister. Do
what's right.
People
drive these roads. I drive these roads. You can laugh but you drive these roads
and a lot of people in your own district drive these roads. We know you're after
spending about $30 million in your own district in the last few years. Maybe you
should start spreading a bit of it around to your neighbouring communities.
The CBC
took it upon themselves to spend a couple of days down there taping the paved
roads. We all know the truth. There are more roads there we haven't got to. This
year, I believe, it's $12 million on this one. Only for COVID it would probably
would have been higher.
So get
up and answer the lady's question. Tell the people of her district, and yours
and mine, why these roads are the way they are. I drove those roads myself,
Minister. I couldn't drink a coffee. I was in the backseat of a car, I almost
needed a helmet on to go up the road; it's that bad. I trust you, it's that bad.
Get up
and answer the people. Tell the people the state of the road. Give an answer to
the people, b'y. Stand up and do what you're supposed to do.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Transportation and Works.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. CROCKER:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker, and I appreciate the Member's banter.
He's
quick to move on now, Mr. Speaker, because he has seen the efforts and he has
seen the way the five-year Roads Plan works. I just have to refer to Foxtrap
Access Road. Foxtrap Access Road was a road that was listed for completion, I
think in an out year from the Roads Plan, and we were able to elevate that road.
Mr.
Speaker, I do have to do one thing before I stop. I want to take an opportunity
right here. He referenced Holyrood. I want to thank Mayor Goobie and the senior
staff in the Town of Holyrood for the amazing job that they did and how they
worked with us during the excavation work on the highway, Mr. Speaker. Again,
I'm just going to take this opportunity to thank Mayor Goobie and the senior
staff in Holyrood.
I say to
all Members in this House – and I've spoken to Members on all sides of the House
– so far this year we have had a successful year in our tendering in this
province, Mr. Speaker. That will enable us –
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. CROCKER:
Mr. Speaker, I'm trying to
get my words out. I know my time is running out, but I can't hear myself.
We have
had a successful year in –
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MR. CROCKER:
We've had a successful year
to date, Mr. Speaker, in tendering in this province, as we've done in the past.
If there are ways to move projects forward, we will certainly be doing that as
the construction season moves forward.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Torngat Mountains.
MS. EVANS:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I think
the biggest joke is I'd like to have roads to complain about potholes. I'd like
to be able to drive in a car from the North Coast to Goose Bay and complain
about spilling my coffee because I'm sitting in the back seat of a car actually
driving on a highway. That would be great and I would really appreciate it.
petition actually is for – because we have no roads and we don't have a reliable
ferry service, Mr. Speaker, I'm presenting this petition: We, the undersigned,
are concerned citizens of Newfoundland and Labrador who urge our leaders to
return affordable air travel to the region of Northern Labrador through
subsidization of the cost of airfare between Happy Valley-Goose Bay and the
Northern Labrador communities of Rigolet, Makkovik, Postville, Hopedale,
Natuashish and Nain.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
I'd like
to hear the petition the Member is presenting.
MS. EVANS:
Our Northern Labrador communities are totally isolated, with no road access to
complain about and marine transportation is limited only to the summer months.
With the provincial government's cancellation of the Lewisporte freight ferry to
our communities, families are now struggling with increasing basic costs,
including food security.
Our only
means of transportation is marine or air. Our marine transportation service is a
once-a-week ferry running July to October. Our air transportation service is
provided by a single monopoly airline, Air Borealis. The cost of air travel for
residents living in Northern Labrador is grossly disproportionate to their
available income, thereby restricting travel and increasing cost of living and
contributing to isolation.
Therefore, we petition the hon. House of Assembly as follows: We, the
undersigned, call upon the House of Assembly to urge the Government of
Newfoundland and Labrador to provide an air transportation subsidy to reduce the
cost of airfare between Happy Valley-Goose Bay and the Northern Labrador
communities.
Now,
it's hard to come here and actually ask for a subsidy because I'm starting to
understand how government works; it's difficult. This petition was actually
signed last year; I just didn't get a chance to present this particular one.
That was while people still had hope.
We've
heard in this House me stand and talk about the failure of the ferry service.
Every time I do, when I talk about the ferry service I talk about how important
it is, Mr. Speaker, to the people. A lot of people in this House were shocked
when I said for one person to fly from our most northern community to Happy
Valley-Goose Bay, return, is a thousand dollars. So imagine trying to take your
family on vacation if you have three or four kids. You can't.
I was
talking to my sister the other night who is actually a teacher. She said: Lela,
there are people in communities that have not been able to travel. I phoned and
I was talking to a mother a couple of weeks ago. She said we can't afford to
travel and her and her husband work.
This
petition is about an airline subsidy but it's also about showing the failure of
essential service to six Indigenous communities, failure of service.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Transportation and Works, with a response.
MR. CROCKER:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker, and I thank the hon. Member for the petition.
Mr.
Speaker, I understand exactly what the hon. Member is talking about because she
and I had a lengthy discussion a couple, or three weeks back, about even the
allocation right now as we go through COVID. The Member arranged a meeting with
myself and one of our officials with the AngajukKâks to talk about how people –
I guess, lower income people or even middle-income people – are disadvantaged
now even more so this year than they would have been last year, because at this
point in time we've had to place passenger restrictions on the ferries.
Unfortunately, at this point we've had to allocate, I guess, passage to two
communities. We're going to work with that as we come through the different
stages of our alert levels and hopefully be able to increase that, while
ensuring the security of those communities. I've heard loud and clear from the
NG, as well at the AngajukKâks and the Member, the concerns around being remote
communities and something like COVID.
Mr.
Speaker, we will certainly look at ways to alleviate the travel strains on the
North Coast this coming season.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Harbour Main.
MS. CONWAY OTTENHEIMER:
Thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
Mr.
Speaker, the background to this petition is many residents of the District of
Harbour Main, especially those of Seal Cove, have spoken to the state of
disrepair to the channel, or the gut, as it's locally known.
Conception Bay South itself consists of coastal communities and it's a popular
destination for boaters from all over the province. The Seal Cove Channel has
been an access point for recreational and commercial fishers and boaters since
the area was first settled. The iron retaining wall that protects the trestle is
now failing and it's causing the natural rock and debris to enter the channel
making it very unsafe for boaters.
petition the hon. House of Assembly to urge the Government of Newfoundland and
Labrador to immediately take the necessary steps to repair and restore the train
trestle in the Seal Cove Channel, to ensure boater safety and the safety of the
general public who use this channel for their recreational pleasure.
Mr.
Speaker, just by way of background, this is amazing future development potential
in this area. I've been there. It's absolutely beautiful but it's undeveloped.
Not only is it undeveloped, more importantly, it's left to deteriorate. The pond
itself offers a beautiful sheltered waterfront with easy access to Conception
Bay, the bay itself. It is a popular destination for boaters from all over the
area, including Mount Pearl and St. John's.
As well,
another benefit is that each year during the food fishery, Seal Cove Pond is the
access point to Conception Bay for many boaters. It's a huge economic driver for
businesses during the summer months and there's a lot of spinoff for local
businesses with respect to fuel purposes.
Mr.
Speaker, sadly, there's a risk of losing Seal Cove Pond as an access point for
Conception Bay. The channel itself is in serious disrepair. Over the past
several years – at least for five years – numerous discussions, correspondence
and lobbying has taken place on behalf of residents and neighbouring communities
regarding the condition of the trestle over Seal Cove Pond, and now it's an
issue of safety throughout the channel underneath.
Many
residents of my District of Harbour Main, especially those of Seal Cove, have
raised these concerns, their disappointments. They've raised their frustrations
regarding these problems that have occurred in the channel and they continue to
be ignored. Mr. Speaker, we're asking and imploring the government to look at
this.
The
Minister of Tourism mentioned the importance of staying in Newfoundland and
enjoying our province. We have a gem here in our midst, a treasure in our midst.
It would be a big disappointment to the many boaters not only in the area, but
Mount Pearl and St. John's, who go there. However, the retaining wall which was
there to protect the train trestle is now falling and we have to have some
action, remedial action.
Mr.
Speaker, I ask the government to take an interest, not only for the people, but
there is a vested interest in acting to preserve this important area in the
Conception Bay South area.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Tourism, Culture, Industry and Innovation with a response.
MR. DAVIS:
Mr. Speaker, I thank the hon.
Member for the petition.
couldn't agree more that the gem we have that's our trail networks within our
province – the one in particular that she's talking about is, I think, 900 km
running right across the Island – it's very impressive in and of itself. The one
issue that we struggle with, with that trail system, like any investment, is the
amount of money to put into it to try to maintain it.
We do
some preventative maintenance on that. We're working on some of the washouts
that have happened over the last little bit, but one of the opportunities that
is challenging is the budget that would be required to maintain a 900-kilometre
trail system. I get exactly what the hon. Member is saying. I support the idea
of that and I'll be looking, as a department, to try to do anything we can to
expand our trail networks and work with areas to try to support that
appropriation of money.
One good
thing about the trail networks that we do have, there have been a lot of
advancements in those. I remember in my previous position with Advanced
Education, Skills and Labour, there was a lot of JCP money that went to the
trail development in our province. I do hear what the hon. Member is saying and
I do appreciate the concern she brought forward.
Thank
you.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for St.
John's Centre.
MR. J. DINN:
My legs are getting tired,
Mr. Speaker. I think I've improved my quad strength for sure, but anyway.
AN HON. MEMBER:
That's all that hair.
MR. J. DINN:
Another hair joke.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
I have a
petition here for updating the anti-racist education in Newfoundland and
Labrador's secondary schools. The reasons for this petition: racism, recognizing
that racism is a systemic issue that remains incredibly prevalent in North
America, Canada and here in Newfoundland, as we can see by the global protests
and here in our province.
The only
way to effectively dismantle these systems is by tackling them from within our
own institutions, and this includes our education system. The Newfoundland and
Labrador high school curriculum, as it currently stands, has inadequate
anti-racist education. Books and stories about BIPOC – or black, Indigenous,
people of colour – should come from BIPOC authors rather than through a white
lens.
Therefore, we, the undersigned, call upon the House of Assembly to urge the
and French-language arts books list to include more BIPOC – or black,
Indigenous, people of colour – authors and specific resources regarding
anti-racism; update the social studies curriculum to include more anti-racist
resources as well as more comprehensive histories of BIPOC communities;
recognize and teach the significance of Black History Month every February; and
consult with local BIPOC leaders within the community when implementing these
changes to ensure that updated curriculum properly represents these communities,
and properly compensate these leaders for their time and efforts.
Mr.
Speaker, when I was a teacher and I taught at junior high, up on the Southern
Shore when I had to be a master of everything – well, no, attempt to be a master
of everything – I had the opportunity to teach in a lot of courses across the
curriculum. That included bringing people in; believe or not, survivors of
Auschwitz and survivors of apartheid in South Africa at the time.
We had a
number of speakers who would come in, and I had an opportunity to teach this
across the curriculum not only within –
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
I ask
Members to keep the noise level down; I'm having trouble hearing the speaker.
The hon.
the Member for St. John's Centre.
MR. J. DINN:
Thank you.
Not only
on and so forth. It was a great opportunity to bring these social justice issues
to the forefront.
However,
there was very little in the way of curriculum that would deal with people of
Protestant background, but we know we've become more diverse, Mr. Speaker, as
the years go on, so we need to reflect that. For that reason, we encourage the
minister to improve and to have a more diverse curriculum to reflect that.
Thank
you.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Education and Early Childhood Development with a response.
MR. WARR:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The hon.
Member for St. John's Centre brings up a very important issue and those
discussions are occurring. Currently, race and racism are common themes in both
the language arts and social studies curriculum. The issue of present-day racism
is not explicitly taught as part of the curriculum; however, discussions
encouraging critical thinking about world events, such as the Black Lives Matter
movement, are often part of the class work.
Such
discussions are encouraged and opportunities and input on how to strengthen the
curriculum or to do things better are always welcomed. We also welcome and
encourage the celebration of Black History Month in schools. Mr. Speaker,
through the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development and Advanced
Education, Skills and Labour, we are taking several steps to improve
multicultural education within Newfoundland and Labrador.
I'll
also end on the fact that issues related to racism is the focus and attention of
our Safe and Caring Schools initiatives.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Labrador West.
MR. BROWN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I'd like
to present this petition on behalf of the residents of Labrador West.
Since 2010, the province has seen significant work stoppages, including a
16-month strike at Vale in Voisey's Bay in 2010 to 2011 and a two-year lockout
at D-J Composites in 2016 to 2018. These work stoppages involve multinational
corporations that have practices that have altered the balancing of collective
bargaining.
The
industrial inquiry into the Voisey's Bay strike recommended changes to the
Labour Relations Act to include the imposition of binding arbitration as an
effective means to achieve a fair collective agreements when all else fails. The
only way to uphold the workers' right to a strike is to ensure companies are not
permitted to replace their workers during a labour dispute.
Therefore, we, the undersigned, call upon the House of Assembly to urge the
Government of Newfoundland and Labrador to bring forward amendments to the
Labour Relations Act to impose binding
arbitration – when only one of the two parties make application – in cases where
strikes or lockouts are prolonged, where collective bargaining has failed or
it's in the best interest; and bring forward amendments to the
Labour Relations Act to ban
replacement workers.
Mr.
Speaker, I have this petition here. I presented a similar one earlier the year.
The residents of Labrador West, during their striking things, had found that
there were some issues with workers brought in during the strike. It seems to
bring an unfair balance to the collective bargaining issues. This, on top of
what happened at D-J Composites and then what happened again at Vale at Voisey's
Bay, creates an environment where collective bargaining is just muddled. It
becomes so unachievable. We need the mechanisms in place to make sure that both
sides are operating fairly.
understand that there's mediation and things like that, but sometimes the
companies, especially these larger multinational corporations who don't see the
lens of the province and the value of the workers of this province fairly – so
this is why we need to continue to have these kinds of discussions to make sure
we do bring up this kind of legislation and change the
Labour Relations Act so that it's fair and balanced for everybody
involved. Fairness and balance is good for the province, it's good for the
workplace so we don't have people who are out on the picket line or locked out
from a strike for months and months, and in some cases years on end, because
talks and the bargaining has completely collapsed and failed.
I ask
the minister to take this into serious consideration. This is something that has
been recommended time and time again. We've even had an inquiry into it and
these recommendations and things have been brought up again. I really ask the
minister to take this into serious consideration and address the needs and the
desire for these individuals who have been victims of the collapse in fair
collective bargaining.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Member for Grand Falls-Windsor - Buchans.
MR. TIBBS:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker.
Mr.
Speaker, the Buchans Highway is in desperate need of repairs in several areas.
The 10-kilometre stretch before Millertown has been decimated from heavy logging
trucks and years of negligence.
Just
before the Buchans highway, Mr. Speaker –
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
I'd like
to hear the Member's petition.
The hon.
the Member for Grand Falls-Windsor - Buchans.
MR. TIBBS:
This beautiful stretch of
highway, the Buchans highway, Mr. Speaker, a lot of money went into it but it
will soon be destroyed due to washouts which are now at the highway's edge. This
presents a possibility of destruction to millions of dollars of roadwork to a
lack of maintenance. More importantly, the safety concern is unforgiving, as
we've seen fatalities on this highway before.
Therefore, we petition the hon. House of Assembly as follows: We, the
undersigned, call upon the House of Assembly to urge the Government of
Newfoundland and Labrador to ensure maintenance is given to the washouts on the
Buchans Highway permanently or regularly so they are not faced with spending
millions to fix a new highway again, as well preventing any accidents in the
future.
Mr.
Speaker, when you drive up the Buchans Highway now there's about 25 pylons where
washouts are. It is an absolutely beautiful piece of highway, no complaints
whatsoever with that piece of highway. But as we go into the future, I know that
the purse strings are going to get tightened here because of COVID-19 and where
the province sits, financially. So I want to make sure that the good work that
we have done so far remains intact.
Like I
say, the highway is absolutely pristine right now, but these washouts are
literally about to go underneath this Buchans Highway, Mr. Speaker, and millions
upon millions of dollars that went into this are going to have to go back into
it again one day. I just want to get a handle on it now before it gets out of
hand or before somebody gets hurt.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Transportation and Works with a response.
MR. CROCKER:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and I
thank the hon. Member for the petition.
As he
was reading I did make some jot notes and I'll send them to the Operations
Division.
I am
going to take a moment just to thank the Operations Division, because, Mr.
Speaker, COVID has really hampered our abilities in maintenance this year. We're
getting back in stride now. Our workers are adjusting. There are many challenges
we're facing, but I can assure the hon. Member, I'll make sure that the
Operations Division gets that.
Actually, I thank the hon. Member, because one of the challenges we saw some
years back, our depots were reduced to – cut in half, actually, from winter to
summer maintenance. One of the challenges we've seen ever since those drastic
cuts were made back 2004-2005, we really struggle when it comes to summer
maintenance, Mr. Speaker. We've been
looking at ways to adjust that, and we're certainly continue to do so.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Topsail - Paradise.
MR. P. DINN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I have
to say, this reminds me of growing up around the kitchen table and there's only
one piece of pie left – trying to get a petition in today. And as you realize,
the Member for St. John's Centre got ahead of me again, right.
WHEREAS
affordable, reliable and safe child care is a necessary component of a
functioning society, especially one that expects to reduce poverty, create
employment, decrease outmigration, increase in-migration, increase population
and the workforce, which are essential to a growing economy;
THEREFORE, we petition the House of Assembly as follows: We, the undersigned,
call upon the House of Assembly to urge the Government of Newfoundland and
Labrador to develop a child care strategy that will provide affordable,
accessible and quality child care for Newfoundland and Labrador parents of
different economic and social backgrounds.
Mr.
Speaker, I think it's no news to anyone, but we are in a critical stage here –
our province, with the economy and that – but we also need to build our
population. One of the key areas to build that is with our most valuable
resource. We pump money into our mining, into our oil and gas, into our
forestry, into our fishery. These are all extremely important, but our child
care, our children, they are our most valuable resource. If we're going to
attract people back to the province, if we're going to keep people in the
province, if we're going to have more people working, if we are going to
increase our population, we have to have affordable child care.
cannot ignore investment or further investment into child care. We found this
out. Many studies, many surveys we have done, people want to come back, first,
where they have meaningful employment and, secondly, where they can raise a
family. We need to build our population.
Our
natural population growth is outpaced by our mortality rate about 12 years ago.
Our fertility rate we really have to work on. Individuals out there, young
parents, young families – much like the substitute teachers I spoke about
earlier – they need to have resources here that are affordable and allows them
to have children, or have additional children and have them stay here in the
province.
I do
implore the government to seriously look into this. I know there have been steps
taken; I know we are trying to do what we can there, but building our base
population, creating a province for young families to stay, live, work and play
is crucial.
Thank
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Education and Early Childhood Development with a response.
MR. WARR:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and I
thank the hon. Member for Topsail - Paradise for his petition.
understand the importance of the sector, of supporting young families and we've
child care services in the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
The last
report on child care fees from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
stated that child care fees, Mr. Speaker, in St. John's have plummeted 24 per
cent since 2017. This is the largest decrease for preschool-age fees of any city
in the country in the category.
Through
the Operating Grant Program, we are increasing the number of affordable child
care spaces and we have been investing $17 million, annually, Mr. Speaker, in
the Childcare Services Subsidy Program to ensure families with low-to-middle
incomes will have access to crucial supports for reducing child care costs.
I will
add to that, Mr. Speaker, that we've also put in $14.7 million in the Essential
Worker Child Care Program during COVID-19. I think this government has shown the
young families in Newfoundland and Labrador that we understand the importance of
child care and we are prepared to put the investment there.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for Mount
Pearl - Southlands.
MR. LANE:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Sticking
to the theme. There are many families in Newfoundland and Labrador struggling
with issues associated to child care as available child care facilities are
unable to meet the demand due to impacts of COVID-19s social distancing
requirements.
This has
caused problems for child care operators who are unable to take in enough
children to make their business viable, problems for families who require spaces
and can't obtain them and also problems for families being asked to pay for
spaces they can't use as a means of keeping child care facilities open and
ensuring their spaces are held for these families when they become available.
Therefore, we petition the House of Assembly as follows: To urge the Government
of Newfoundland and Labrador to work with daycare operators in our province to
seek solutions to this massive problem, including giving consideration to the
continuation of daycare subsidy program utilizing a sliding scale as they have
recently announced in the Province of Nova Scotia.
Mr.
Speaker, again, I'll give full credit in terms of there was a great response by
our government as it relates to COVID-19 in terms of continuing with the child
care subsidies and the grants and so on to the child care facilities, so that
they could basically ensure the viability of their businesses once the Alert
Levels change and they got back.
As has
been indicated here by the petition though, we are still running into some
problems, because what has happened, of course, is that due to the COVID
restrictions, I know we're moving up an Alert Level and I'm hoping that that's
going to take care of a lot of this, but with the current restrictions on social
distancing and so on, you have a facility that maybe it had 60 kids, now they
can only have 30 kids or 40 kids.
I know
the minister talked about 70 per cent capacity, but the child care operators
tell me that the reality is they are not able to accommodate 70 per cent of the
children; by the time you look at the space they actually have in their
facilities and then the other resources, the staff and everything else. The
reality of it is they are probably at about 40 – or at least they were – at
about 40 to 50 per cent capacity.
That
becomes a challenge when you do the math, because 50 per cent of revenue does
not equal anything necessarily to your bottom line because depending on what
margins you're at, of course, you may need to have 70 or 80 per cent capacity
just to break even. You don't actually start making a profit until you reach a
certain point, so that's a challenge.
What's
happening, of course, is in order to make a lot of these businesses viable now
they're going to parents and saying: in order to stay viable, we need you to pay
for spaces that you're not even getting, just so that we can hold your space.
This is creating problems.
In the
Province of Nova Scotia, they're using a sliding scale whereby if they're only
at 50 per cent capacity, then the government is continuing with the subsidy for
the other 50 per cent. Once they get to 80 per cent capacity, the government
gives them 20 per cent. So it's like a sliding scale until they get back up to
full capacity. That's what was announced in Nova Scotia and that's what's being
suggested could be done here.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Education and Early Childhood Development for a response.
MR. WARR:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I thank
the Member for Mount Pearl - Southlands for his petition. I also thank him
because I think he's a Member, probably, in this Legislature that I heard from
the most during COVID. He's taken every opportunity to pass along all the
concerns of his constituents, in both daycare issues and certainly with the
substitute teachers. I've certainly appreciated how well he's treated his
constituents.
With
regard to daycare, again, we understand the concerns. It is anticipated that as
of Monday we will go to Alert Level 2 and that means that our regulated child
care centres will be back to 100 per cent capacity.
Again,
Mr. Speaker, we provided $14.7 million in compensation to regulated child care
services to pay for all spaces during COVID. Approximately, 280 of the 300
centres availed of that particular grant, Mr. Speaker.
I see my
time is up.
Thank
you.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for
Ferryland.
MR. O'DRISCOLL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The
Public Utilities Board has approved a licence for an ambulance owner to operate
in the area from Bay Bulls to Bauline. This area is one of the fastest growing
areas of the province. There have been many concerns from residents,
municipalities, councils and emergency responders regarding response times.
Therefore, we petition the hon. House of Assembly as follows: We, the
undersigned, call upon the House of Assembly to urge the Government of
Newfoundland and Labrador to support the position to this service provider and
ensure the residents of Bays Bulls to Bauline meet national standards for
response times.
Regarding this petition, the area is very fast –
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
I'm
having trouble hearing the Member. I'd like to just hear from the Member who has
been recognized.
The hon.
the Member for Ferryland.
MR. O'DRISCOLL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The area
is a fast growing area; one of the fastest in the province. When you're dealing
with ambulances, obviously, the closest one to St. John's would be in Cape
Broyle. So the residents from Bay Bulls to Bauline are at a disadvantage for
sure when it comes to that. They have a half hour to 40 minute response time.
If you
live in Bauline, Burnt Cove, St. Michael's area you have a 45 minute response
time from St. John's, if there's one available. If not, it would be 25 to 30
minutes from Cape Broyle to get down, if there's an ambulance available up
there. It's a growing concern in our area.
We have
our great volunteer fire departments from Witless Bay and the Ferryland area as
well that respond to take care of this until an ambulance arrives, but we would
certainly love to have this looked at in our area.
Thank
you very much.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Opposition House
Leader.
MR. BRAZIL:
Mr. Speaker, I stand on a
point of order.
Normally, point of orders are confrontational or looking for clarification but I
stand on this one, on behalf of our caucus here, to thank the Government House
Leader for the privilege of allowing people – because we've had a shortened
session, to no fault of anybody in this House of Assembly – to express the
concerns and echo the recommendations of the people in their district through
the petition process.
I ask
and thank the Government House Leader for her indulgence here and her allowing
us to do that, and, Mr. Speaker, yourself for allowing us to take us through
this process, particularly where it's our last day to serve the people during
this sitting.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Government House
Leader, speaking to this point of order or –?
MS. COADY:
No, Orders of the Day.
MR. SPEAKER:
Okay.
While
there's no point of order, I appreciate the Member's comments, given the spirit.
Orders of the Day
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Government House
Leader.
MS. COADY:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Now,
I'll thank the Member opposite, all Members of this House, for their
co-operation over this very challenging time that we've come through. It has
been a privilege and an honour to work with everyone in this House to do the
business of the people. I thank you for that co-operation.
I will
call from the Order Paper, Order 5, second reading of Bill 39.
MR. SPEAKER:
I think the Member for Lake
Melville has some time left on the clock.
The hon.
the Member for Lake Melville.
MR. TRIMPER:
Thank you very much, Mr.
Speaker.
I'm just
having a little glance at the clock to see how much time I might have. Whether
there's time for a story. Maybe I'll start with –
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
(Inaudible.)
MR. TRIMPER:
I could tell a lot of stories there.
Thank
you very much, Mr. Speaker.
It is a
pleasure to return to this very important bill. I wanted to start with something
– this is very much an environmental issue and it's one that touches our
economy, it touches the agricultural sector, it touches every bit of food that
we eat on our plate.
I want
to start by way of an example as to the nuances of the environment. I was just
looking at a very interesting photo that was sent to me for some inspiration of
two bumblebees asleep in a flower. If you didn't stop and pause and have a look
at that you would miss it. And so much that goes on in the environment is like
that.
I was
reflecting back, and just a little story before I get into the seriousness of
what we're talking about. In the mid-80s, I worked for the Canadian Wildlife
Service. At the time, the big issue of the day was acid rain. Prime Minister
Mulrooney, President Reagan at the time, signed an international agreement and,
lo and behold, through international co-operation we made huge progress on that.
At the
time, I was looking at the effects of acidification on lakes on loons. On common
loons and how they breed. Because the problem was is that as the pH dropped in
these lakes, there was no longer any fish being produced. And the loons, the
adults, would fly off to another lake to feed, but they would never bring the
fish back to the nest and the youngsters were in the nest dying. It was amazing.
It just was so obvious, the solution was so apparent; yet, we lost many, many
lakes with loons. We've recovered.
The
point that I wanted to talk about is – and this applies to so much of this
province – when we go out into the environment we really need to think about
what we're doing. I recall one day, I was on a place called Red Rock Lake, and
we were approaching a loon's nest and it had been raining. As I came up on the
loon's nest, there are two guys in a canoe, in a boat, and they had been fishing
for several hours. There were two adult loons all around their boat displaying
diving, calling.
The two
guys, we came up on them and they said, wow, what a show these adult loons have
been putting on for us. I said, how long have you been there? He said, oh, about
three hours. It was pouring rain. Well, guess what? Those two adults were the
parents of the eggs in the nest. The rain's falling down on them. They were so
agitated and upset, they were trying to do what they can to drive away this
intrusion. Those fishermen didn't realize it, but they killed those eggs just by
sitting in a canoe and casually taking pictures of these adult loons. That is so
much of the nuance of the harm that we cause in this environment. I just leave
that thought.
What I
want to carry on with is about this varroa mite. It, again, is incredibly small
and if you didn't look you wouldn't know. For those who don't raise bees, the
good Minister of Health and Community Services was just telling me that in
Manchester when we was a young lad – not all that long ago, I'm sure – he was
raising bees. If you spend the time to work around agriculture or raising
beehives and so on, you will truly appreciate just how important bees are for
our society.
What I
wanted to go to is related, of course, to COVID-19. The bill is all about seeing
what we can do to take advantage of an amazing situation we have. Right now we
are essentially virus-free and we are also essentially varroa destructor – this
amazing mite that destroys bees – free as well. This is both an opportunity, an
advantage and a challenge. As I said the other day, 30 per cent of the foods
that we eat are all pollinated by bees, so it's really important that we
appreciate the role these small insects are doing so that we can have a
sustainable food supply.
If you
have worked around bees, you'll know that what farmers do is they can actually
take bees in the hives, go to a field, set up for a few days; when the crop is
there, and the blossoms are out and the opportunity for pollination is so
important, they actually rent the bees out. Over a course of a few days, the
farmer can have results in the yield of the crop – very dramatic over what they
would have had just by other situations, allowing wind or perhaps other insects.
It's incredibly lucrative for the farmer and for those who are holding these
beehives to get involved in this.
As I was
doing a little bit of research, it's interesting that across Canada, each spring
as we go to prepare for the agriculture sector and bring in these beehives, we
actually have a serious problem in the country right now. Because of COVID-19
and the shutdown of international flights, farmers are not able to get in the
replenishment queens and other members of the colonies to stock up their hives.
I just
checked some numbers, and Ontario alone needs 3,500 shipments of bees that
they're waiting on right now. Across the country it's probably close to 100,000
beehives. I would anticipate that unless we can get this resolved very quickly,
we are going to see a much lower production of food across the country and
that's going to affect so many other aspects of –
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
I'm
having trouble hearing the Member make his comments on this bill and I'd ask
Members to lower the level of noise so we can all hear the Member for Lake
Melville.
The hon.
the Member for Lake Melville.
MR. TRIMPER:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
With
this pressure to import, there is also great pressure in our own province to
import because those that are working with bees, they need to bring in bees, but
the key thing here is that we need to make sure those bees are pest-free.
There
are four problems affecting bees around the world, particularly in Canada:
pesticides. There are a whole group of pesticides which are wiping out bees.
They affect their behaviours and lead to increased mortality.
Habitat
loss: Maintenance of wild habitats is extremely important. Climate change: I
spoke a week or so ago about getting to net zero and the importance of what we
anticipate, whether it be Nain at 7.6 degrees or St. John's at 3.4 degrees
Celsius increase in temperature, you can imagine what that's going to do to the
reliability.
I look
to my colleague across the way, the good farmer from Mount Pearl North, who
correctly stated that it's the unpredictability of the climate situation,
getting weather that you don't anticipate. You can imagine what a warm spell
would do in the wintertime to bees that are trying to ride out some cold
temperatures and then they're suddenly stimulated to become active, only to see
there are still a couple months of winter left. You can imagine what that does
to them.
Finally,
the key reason why we're here, there is a serious mite, called varroa destructor
is its Latin name, the varroa mite. It is challenging bee production and food
production around the world. The amazing thing is that Newfoundland and
Labrador, as the good minister said the other day, we are pest-free of this
mite. This is a tremendous advantage and it's one that we need to take advantage
of. We need to maintain that status.
As the
minister said the other day – and I wanted to use sort of an analogy when we
talk about – one of the questions today in Question Period was whether or not we
are, as a jurisdiction, as a subnational government, ready to partner up maybe
with other Atlantic provinces and would we consider doing this.
I would
like to say that if you're thinking about a dance card, we're a pretty
attractive partner right now. We've essentially eliminated this virus. We've
done very well. The residents of this province, the health care system, we've
all collectively contributed to be a very attractive dance partner.
I can
think of some states that we may not be so much interested in partnering up
with, but from our perspective people are wanting to see us. Similarly, when you
have bees that are pest-free, we also have a very exciting dance card and we can
be very circumspect about who we are providing them to.
There
was a very interesting
article this morning – the Member for Topsail - Paradise,
I wonder if he noticed this because the gentleman's name is Paul Dinn. He was
speaking about this issue and this bill and he was concerned that he felt that
we shouldn't be importing bees at all. I saw that the minister was referenced in
his comments in responding because he said, while that's certainly a lofty,
aspirational goal to get to a point where we don't need to import bees, we
currently do.
I would
hope that with the injection of the resources, the appointment of an apiarist
and other initiatives that are going on in the department, through the
legislation that will pass, we can really give a boost to an amazingly
attractive dance partner, amazingly attractive bee industry that we have here.
The
Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry, they recently produced a
report in 2015 outlining a whole host of challenges and suggested resolution
that governments, organizations and even individuals can all do to help address
the decline of bees and effects on food production in the country.
I would
refer you to it; I'm not going to go through it in detail but as I reach out to
my colleagues in this House of Assembly and across the province, those who are
watching and listening, there are some individual things that we can all do.
Certainly, you can avoid foods that are grown using these harmful group of
pesticides; they are called neonicotinoids. This particular group of pesticides
are causing this problem and if you look on the label, you can often find out
what source of pest control was used to grow these crops. Organic-free
vegetables and anything you'd buy of an organic-free nature would not have that
problem.
You can
go out in your backyard and plant a garden. You can let a
section of your
property go wild. These are all the kinds of things that you can do to encourage
bee habitat. As I said a week ago, in the PMR, you can also reduce your carbon
footprint and slow down the effects of climate change.
course, the final thing and to address the varroa mite, the key thing is to
support Bill 39. It does several things; there are amendments under the act. As
I said, we can get a provincial apiarist appointed and, of course, we can get
the regulations in place that will both protect and help grow this very
important industry and provide this opportunity for Newfoundland and Labrador.
With
that, I will conclude my remarks. I thank you for the opportunity to again
appear today and I'll turn it over to further speakers and the minister to wrap
it up.
Thank
you very much.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for St.
John's Centre.
MR. J. DINN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I'll
start with a little poetry:
“I will
arise and go now, and go to Innisfree,
And a
small cabin build there, of clay and wattles made;
Nine
bean-rows will I have there, a hive for the honey-bee,
And live
alone in the bee-loud glade.”
That's
from William Butler Yeats.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. J. DINN:
No doubt about it, bees are a
source, if nothing else, of quietude and relaxation. Or from Sue Monk Kidd's
The Secret Life of Bees , “Most people
don't have any idea about all the complicated life going on inside a hive. Bees
have a secret life we don't know anything about.”
I guess
that's the key point here. We're only starting to realize just how integral bees
are to our very existence on this planet. They're not just a subject of poetry,
but they are necessary for our survival. If anything, we've seen in the past
number of years are plagues, I guess, that seem to be affecting wildlife – bats
with white-nose syndrome, bees with the varroa mite. Some might say it's part of
climate change; others might say it's part of the changes that we've brought
about on the environment ourselves. But there's no doubt it, if we're going to
in any way attain food security, it's important then to protect honeybees. This
is what this act is about, or this amendment.
This
amendment basically adds the definition of a honeybee. It requires an employee
of the department to be designated as the provincial apiarist – definitely to
have that person designated would indicate how important bees are to our food
production – require that an applicant for a licence must provide information
outlined in the regulations and give authority to the provincial apiarist to
conduct duties outlined in the act, such as inspections and enforce
registration.
Our
caucus will be supporting this bill. We understand the Beekeeping Association of
Newfoundland and Labrador has been consulted throughout the process, Mr.
Speaker, and they are satisfied and supportive of the amendments enabling this
bill.
We know,
of course, that there are many other insects within Newfoundland, such as the
bumblebee, that offer pollination to our plants, not only to wild plants but
also to our agricultural industry and farmers as well. We know that honeybees
themselves are domesticated insects and are regulated under the Animal Health
Act. They're different species from wild bumblebees. We have one honeybee
species in Newfoundland called Apis mellifera. This legislation is implementing
protection for this species, as bumblebees are already protected.
Interestingly enough, the genetic composition of our honeybees in Newfoundland
and Labrador is largely the creation of Wally Skinner, Andrea Skinner and Paige
Marchant with the Newfoundland Bee Company, who have been supplying nucleus
colonies and queens to beekeepers from the Island for many years. So in many
ways we've got a made in Newfoundland solution here.
The key
thing, and it's been brought up by previous speakers, is the pest-free status of
our honeybees. The common pest found on these bees has been found elsewhere in
the world the varroa mite.
Given
that we are one of the places in the world without this pest, it's extremely
important that we implement this policy to protect the honeybees in
Newfoundland. We know the demand for honeybees in Newfoundland is very high,
which risks illegal importation.
We have
more people in our province wanting honeybees than we can successfully supply.
We understand that honeybees cannot be imported into Newfoundland and Labrador
without a permit from a varroa-free origin such as the Isle of Man and Western
Australia. However, I too read the same
article and listened on CBC with Paul
Dinn and listened to it yesterday. Now, that is a different branch of the Dinn
family. No connection to us, but I figure anytime a Dinn speaks he or she is
worth listening to – just saying.
So he
made note – and here's an interesting – when we look at a precautionary
principle. He's saying mandatory registration, Mr. Speaker, doesn't go far
enough. That really we need to ban importation, and that maybe there is a – I
understand at this time maybe the capacity to do so is limited, but maybe we can
start to look at again if we have a honeybee that the genetic composition is
largely the creation of local – is a local home-grown solution, then maybe we
need to find a local home-grown solution to encouraging the growth of the bee
industry here. Something similar to the vegetable transplant or the starts
program, so that we create it here. If there's any way of guaranteeing, as Mr.
Dinn noted, it's about keeping other bees from outside the province outside.
He did
note in his interview with Mr. Blades yesterday on The Go that the main reason probably for bringing bees in, some
people are looking at it seeing dollar signs and they're wishing to import large
colonies so they can rent them out, lease them out to farmers for pollination
purposes. Now, if that's the case, that's a different thing than we need to
build up our population. In other words, we have to look at the reasons why
there is this pressure to do so.
I think
also, I'll speak here in term of – we know we've supported other industries,
salmon aquaculture and so on and so forth, and we know the consequences
sometimes of bringing species in from outside the province can have a
detrimental effect on species that are currently here.
We also
know, you can look at the importation of many non-native species. Well, the
moose is one, but I'm thinking on the West Coast now you do have snakes, a
colony of garter snakes. Newfoundland was snake-free. We do have deer mice. So
we do have other diseases that go along with it.
It's an
interesting thing, Mr. Speaker, we can't get off this Island portion without
having to go through the washing station in Port aux Basques because we don't
want to transport, I think it's the potato blight outside, but it seems that
there's nothing really stopping people from bringing stuff in, whether that's
the purple loosestrife, you name it. So here we are, the bees are indeed sort of
a non-native population, but we've managed to create something that's special
here, that's disease-free. I think, if nothing else, it's important to protect
it.
The
other thing I didn't realize is that St. John's is probably one of the most
bee-friendly cities in the country. What we're looking at here – I don't know if
any of you – we take a number of actions to protect our bees such as leaving
dandelions on the lawn. We know also that bees are dying in larger than average
numbers in North America, Europe and parts of Asia and Africa. We know in the US
there's been a honeybee decline from about 6 million hives in 1947 to only 2.4
million hives in 2008. That's a 60 per cent reduction.
Last
year, the US honeybees had the worst winter die-off in more than a decade,
losing about 40 per cent of the population. So, if anything, I think – not that
I want to see Newfoundland become the sole-source supplier of the world, but I
think it's incumbent on us, not only to protect our own supply of bee
population, maybe increase our own agricultural production, but also protect a
species that is valuable, not only for itself, but to our very existence and the
existence of many other creatures on this planet.
I refer
to my Member's statement this morning about doing those small things sometimes
to protect, to show that connection, our love, for the world and the environment
around us.
So with
this, we will support this bill, but we do believe, Mr. Speaker, that we do need
to go further. I think we do need to very clearly look at supporting our own
beekeepers here and making sure that they have everything that they need to
increase their bee population.
I'll end
with, of course, the words – you can't end anything, if we're going to talk
poetry, without some words from Shakespeare himself: “… for so work the
honeybees, / Creatures that by a rule in nature teach / The act of order to a
peopled kingdom.” That's from Henry V .
If anything they can teach us, it's how important an interconnected environment
and how important a role each organism plays in the survival of this planet and,
indeed, ourselves.
Thank
you, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
If the hon. the Minister of
Fisheries and Land Resources speaks now, he will close the debate.
The hon.
the Minister of Fisheries and Land Resources.
MR. BYRNE:
Thank you very, very much,
Mr. Speaker.
I want
to say my thanks and appreciation to the speakers that did rise and give their
points of view on this particular legislation. I'm delighted that it is
proceeding without amendment and with the unanimous support, or appears to be
the unanimous support, of the House. This is reassuring. It shows that the
government is on a good path, good track, and we are listening to farmers.
Mr.
Speaker, eloquent Members have started their words, their discourse, the debate
with eloquent recitations. I depend on ABBA for all of my quotations, and all I
can think, Mr. Speaker, how appropriate it would be to say: “Honey honey, how
you thrill me, a-ha, honey honey / Honey honey, nearly kill me ….”
MR. SPEAKER:
I would caution the Member
that the health order we're under prevents us from singing, so I'd ask that he
cut the song short for that and other reasons, maybe.
MR. BYRNE:
Mr. Speaker, it would even
more memorable if I tried to sing. If I'd tried to sing ABBA, you would never,
ever forget that.
With
that said, Mr. Speaker, I want to say a true and genuine – in the spirit of
levity and as we gracefully leave this place, I want to say thank you, not only
to the speakers to this particular debate, but all the speakers during our
somewhat shortened, somewhat predicated session here in the House. It's been
very productive, and to end off on an excellent opportunity to provide further
protection to honeybees in this province is going to be, I think, one of the
crowning jewels of this particular session.
Mr.
Speaker, the hon. Member for St. John's Centre eloquently spoke of the
contributions of the Skinner family, which would be very, very true and
appropriate to elevate, but there were a number of West Coast innovators and
pioneers as apiarists. They include John Gullage and Stu Weldon both of whom
were pioneers of this particular field.
While it
was mentioned that a genic stock had been achieved from within the work of the
Skinners, we would never, ever diminish the work of Wally and his family, in
this regard. The truth is that they imported most of their colonies, their nucs
from Nova Scotia and Ontario. In fact, the honeybee is not native to
Newfoundland and Labrador, it is an imported species and, arguably, would be an
invasive species, but I think it would be a friendly invasion if that were to be
the case.
It was
John Gullage and Stu Weldon and the Skinner family, which really provided the
lift to the industry. I cannot forsake or leave out, Gerard Smith, a true, true
gentleman and a pioneer in this regard who, I think, is the father and
grandfather or modern-day apiculture in this province.
Mr.
Speaker, it goes without saying that, indeed, the honeybee is an introduced
species. It's been introduced for many, many years, many decades, but the
genetic stock is not peculiar to Newfoundland and Labrador nor has it been
refined. It's essential, though, that we protect that which we have been able to
benefit from, whether it be through (inaudible) or good, good husbandry, we are
finding ourselves today in a disease-free status.
It is
not certified as such, and that's something the Government of Newfoundland and
Labrador with the Newfoundland and Labrador Beekeeping Association, is currently
working on. There is only one of three places in this planet which are
disease-free: Australia and in particular South West Australia, the Isle of Man
and the Island of Newfoundland and Mainland Labrador.
This is
an important point because, not only does it give our current