PDF Version

August

8, 2017

HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY PROCEEDINGS

Vol. XLVIII No. 24

Members met in the Assembly Chamber on the afternoon of

August 8, 2017 for the Election of a Speaker.

SERGEANT-AT-ARMS:

All rise.

Madam Clerk, His Honour, the Administrator, has

arrived.

CLERK (Barnes):

Admit His Honour, the Administrator.

SERGEANT-AT-ARMS:

is the wish of His Honour, the Administrator, that all present be seated.

CLERK:

Good afternoon.

Members of the House of Assembly, on July 31, 2017, I

received notice of resignation as Speaker of this Assembly from the Honourable

Tom Osborne, Member for the District of Waterford Valley. In accordance with the

Standing Orders, I advised Members of the House of Assembly of the vacancy in

the Office of the Speaker.

I have a Proclamation from His Honour the Lieutenant

Governor:

TO: The Honourable J. Derek Green

Chief Justice of Newfoundland and Labrador, Court of

Appeal.

GREETING;

A PROCLAMATION

WHEREAS by a letter of resignation addressed to the

Clerk of the House of Assembly, the Honourable Tom Osborne, vacated the position

of Speaker of the House of Assembly on July 31, 2017;

AND

WHEREAS it is expedient to call together the

Forty-Eighth General Assembly on the said day for the Members of the House of

Assembly to proceed to their choice of a Speaker;

NOW THEREFORE I, the Lieutenant Governor of the

Province of Newfoundland and Labrador, do authorize and direct you, the said

Honourable J. Derek Green, to assemble for the dispatch of business on Tuesday,

the 8th day of August, 2017 at 2 o'clock in the afternoon, and that it is my

pleasure that they should choose some person to be their Speaker and to present

such person on that day for my approbation.

His Honour the Administrator.

HIS

HONOUR THE ADMINISTRATOR (Chief Justice J. Derek Green): Members of the House of Assembly, I have it in

command of His Honour the Lieutenant Governor to acquaint you that His Honour,

having been informed of the vacancy in the Office of the Speaker of this

Assembly and it being necessary that a Speaker of this Assembly be chosen, it is

His Honour's will that you, the Members of the House of Assembly, do proceed to

the election of a Speaker and that you present that person here today for my

approval.

SERGEANT-AT-ARMS:

All rise.

(His Honour the Administrator leaves the Chamber.)

CLERK:

Please be seated.

At the close of nominations for the Office of the

Speaker at 4:30 p.m., Monday, August 7, 2017, two candidates put their names

forward. The candidates, in alphabetical order, are Ms. Pam Parsons, Mr. Perry

Trimper.

Members of the House of Assembly, pursuant to the

Lieutenant Governor's direction and the Standing Orders of this Assembly, it is

my duty to call upon you to elect a Member to preside over your deliberations as

Speaker.

Would the Sergeant-at-Arms and the Pages please place

the voting booths and the ballot box in position? Would the Pages please

distribute the list of candidates to all Members' desks and place one in each

voting booth?

Before beginning the election, I will briefly outline

the process to be followed as set out in the Standing Orders of this House. For

each round of balloting, Members are asked to proceed starting from the back or

third row of desks on their respective sides of the House and file past the

Speaker's Chair to the head of the Clerk's Table. At the Table, each Member will

be given a ballot and asked to initial a list to verify that they have received

it.

In the voting booth, please print or write legibly the

surname of the candidate you support on the ballot paper, place it in the ballot

box at the end of the Clerk's Table and return to your place. You can only vote

for one candidate, so please do not list or rank the candidates. Write the

surname of your choice for Speaker on the ballot.

When all Members wishing to vote have done so, the

House will recess while the Clerks withdraw to count the vote. A majority of the

votes cast is required to elect the Speaker. If candidates receive the same

number of votes, there will be another ballot.

Immediately before the start of the second or any

subsequent ballot, a Member who wishes to withdraw will be given an opportunity

to do so. When the count of each ballot is completed, a five-minute bell will

ring to call the Members to the Chamber. In preparation for the vote, the

Sergeant-at-Arms will inspect and lock the ballot box.

The list of candidates is on each Member's desk and in

each of the two voting booths. We will now proceed with the beginning of the

voting procedure. I now ask those Members who wish to cast ballots to proceed

starting from the back row from your respective sides of the House to the

Clerk's Table, then proceed to the voting booth and then deposit your ballot in

the ballot box.

If there are any Members who have not voted and wish to

do so, please vote now.

All Members having voted, the House will recess to the

call of the bells while the Clerks at the Table count the ballots. The bells

will ring for five minutes to recall Members to the Chamber when the results of

the first ballot are ready to be announced.

Thank you very much.

Recess

CLERK:

Accordingly, further to suborder 4(11) of the Standing Orders, I declare Mr.

Perry Trimper, Member for the District of Lake Melville, elected as Speaker for

the remainder of the Forty-Eighth General Assembly.

(Applause.)

(The hon. the Premier and the hon. the Leader of the

Official Opposition lead Mr. Trimper to the Speaker's Chair.)

MR.

SPEAKER (Trimper):

Well, this is quite a view.

I have some remarks. First of all, thank you very much,

colleagues. I'm not sure I saw this coming, but I'm very glad to be here. I

thank you all for your support.

I find myself just marveling somehow: How did I end up

in this spot right now?

I showed up in this great province 1987; 30 years ago.

Two guys named Dave Lemon and Steve Fudge gave me a three-month job opportunity

in Labrador. I always used to tease those guys because they never talked about

an extension; I ended up staying and embracing this province. It's been so good

to me and I couldn't be more honoured and humbled to be here with you now.

I must say a very sincere thank you to every Member of

this House. You've all become colleagues of mine, whether I'm on the government

side, where I've been happy to sit, but also getting to know the Opposition.

It's been truly rewarding. I actually enjoy every minute in this House. Some

people say it can pull on you, it can wear on you. I have embraced it and I've

learned a lot here.

It's interesting, as I did some history and prepared

for what might happen to me today, I went back to the 14th century, as one needs

to do to understand the role of the Speaker. In those days, the Speaker was very

much a messenger, a messenger between the news and the monarch, and if that news

wasn't so good, it could often mean the end of that Speaker's career, both

figuratively and physically. So hence the reason why you might want to try to

resist, but with the Leader of the Opposition and the Premier, I didn't have

much hope there. I must say, it's fun to see these traditions. I take them very

seriously and I will certainly take this job very seriously.

I'd also like to acknowledge and commend the Member for

Harbour Grace – Port de Grave for putting her name forward for consideration. I

understand her interest and I wish her well in future endeavours and

opportunities to serve the people of this province.

Thank you very much.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

I alluded to, and as I embarked on this political career just a few short years

ago, I stated that my objective was to always do what I could do to make a

difference, to try to pay it back, as it were, a debt of gratitude that I owe

Newfoundland and Labrador. So to find myself in the Speaker's Chair is very much

an esteemed position and I will be dedicated to facilitating productive debate

and governance to address the important matters in Newfoundland and Labrador.

These last 20 months have been a great adventure.

Having had almost a full career in the private sector, it's allowed me to learn

first-hand the commitment required by each Member of the House, to respond to

the needs of their constituents and other responsibilities entrusted to us by

the people of the province.

I would first of all like to thank my wife, Caroline

Hong, who's up in Labrador, I believe, watching via Internet – hopefully it's

still working – for her steady guidance and support. This political pursuit has

been our team effort.

I also need to express appreciation for all the support

from my parents, June and Wendell Trimper, political veterans; they've been at

this for all of their lives. I'm sure they're watching and, yeah, I thank them

very much. Also my wife's parents – and many people from St. John's will know

them – Lan and Yan Quan William Hong of Hong's Takeout fame for their work ethic

and dedication have been a great support to myself as well.

I've also got a great team around me in this political

arena. I've got a constituency assistant, Bonnie Learning, who's off taking a

very much-needed vacation right now and my executive assistant, Ian Murphy,

who's up in the stands. For all those of you who have worked with Ian and with

Bonnie, you know I'm surrounded by very good people who also enjoy problem

solving. Together, our team looks forward to taking on this new role.

Over these last 20 months I've had the honour to serve

as the minister responsible for some eight departments, offices and boards of

government. I do thank the Premier for entrusting me with this opportunity. I

want to express my gratitude for also having worked with so many dedicated and

experienced staff within the civil service. Your job is not easy but you do your

work well. I continue to be impressed by the calibre of your talent.

I also understand, I'm not sure, but I may be the first

Speaker who was also an MHA representing a district in Labrador. I see this as a

very proud achievement and one that I want to share with the district

association for Lake Melville. I will continue to be appreciative of their

support. I want to reassure all constituents and the communities of Sheshatshiu,

North West River, Churchill Falls, Happy Valley-Goose Bay and especially Mud

Lake, which has had such a difficult year, that they will remain a priority for

me.

I also would like to take the minute, if I could while

I'm on this stage, to a special acknowledgement for a constituent who just

bicycled across Canada raising money for the Children's Wish Foundation. He did

this in an amazing a little over 55-56 days. Matthew Pike, you are to be

congratulated for all you've done. I'd like to have a little round of applause

if I could.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

role of Speaker is to preside over the proceedings of the House of Assembly. The

key characteristics are authority and impartiality. The Speaker is to serve all

Members equally, regardless of party affiliation.

Le president de la Chambre d'assemblée a pour rôle

principal de conduire les délibérations. Les principales charactéristiques des

fonctions du président de la Chambre d'assemblée sont l'autorité et

l'impartialité. Le Président doit traiter tous des députés de maniére égale peu

importe le parti auquel ils appartiennent.

As I step into this new role, I would like to invite

all hon. Members to show their appreciation to the former Speaker, the now hon.

Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board and the MHA for Waterford

Valley, for the example he has set and the bar of excellence that I will attempt

to attain.

Thank you very much.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

all those affiliated with the operation of the House of Assembly, may I say that

I look forward to working with you and the important traditions of this office.

As with my predecessor, my door will be open to all over the remainder of this

Forty-Eighth General Assembly.

This is the people's House. I look forward to doing

what I can to support the people of our province. Thank you, tshinashkumitin,

nakummek, merci beaucoup, shokran.

Thank you.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Premier.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

PREMIER BALL:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

You had mentioned that you liked spending your time in

this House of Assembly and I can assure you now you have the opportunity to

spend every single sitting minute in this House of Assembly, so congratulations.

MR.

SPEAKER:

Thank you.

PREMIER BALL:

also want to recognize the Member for Harbour Grace – Port de Grave for allowing

and showing us democracy in action today, and I appreciate you putting your name

forward.

It's my privilege now to move, and this will be

seconded by the Leader of the Official Opposition, that the Member for the

District of Baie Verte – Green Bay be appointed Deputy Speaker for the remainder

of the Forty-Eighth General Assembly.

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

motion is that the Member for Baie Verte – Green Bay be nominated as the Deputy

Speaker.

All those in favour, ‘aye.'

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Aye.

MR.

SPEAKER:

All

those against, ‘nay.'

Motion carried.

The hon. the Premier.

PREMIER BALL:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I move, again seconded by the Leader of the Official

Opposition, that the Member for the District of St. George's – Humber be

appointed Deputy Chair of Committees for the remainder of the Forty-Eighth

General Assembly.

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

motion is that the Member for St. George's – Humber be nominated as the Deputy

Chair of Committees.

All those in favour, ‘aye.'

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Aye.

MR.

SPEAKER:

Against?

Motion carried.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

SERGEANT-AT-ARMS:

Mr.

Speaker, His Honour, the Administrator, has arrived.

MR.

SPEAKER:

Admit His Honour, the Administrator.

SERGEANT-AT-ARMS:

is the wish of His Honour, the Administrator, that all present be seated.

PREMIER BALL:

May

it please Your Honour, the House of Assembly, agreeable to Your Honour's

command, have proceeded for the choice of Speaker and have elected Mr. Perry

Trimper, the Member for the District of Lake Melville, to that office and by

their direction I present him for the approbation for Your Honour.

HIS

HONOUR THE ADMINISTRATOR (Chief Justice J. Derek Green):

behalf of Her Majesty, I assure you of my sense of your efficiency and I do most

fully approve and confirm you as Speaker.

MR.

SPEAKER:

Thank you.

Your Honour, having approved the choice of this House

in constituting me as their Speaker, it now becomes my duty in the name of the

representatives of Her Majesty's loyal subjects to ask that I, as Speaker, may

have full access to Your Honour's presence at all reasonable times.

HIS

HONOUR THE ADMINISTRATOR:

Mr. Speaker, I am commanded by His Honour, the

Lieutenant Governor, that your words and actions will constantly receive from

him the most favorable construction.

SERGEANT-AT-ARMS:

All

rise.

MR.

SPEAKER:

Please be seated.

MR.

HUTCHINGS:

Point of order.

MR.

SPEAKER:

point of order has been called.

MR.

HUTCHINGS:

Mr.

Speaker, under Standing Order 1: “

(1) The proceedings in the House of Assembly

and in all committees of the House shall be conducted in accordance with the

following Standing Orders and with the sessional and other orders of the House.

“

(2) In all cases not provided for in these Standing

Orders or by sessional or other orders of the House, the Speaker shall be guided

by the following in the order in which they are stated: (

a) the usages, customs

and precedents of this House; (

b) the Standing Orders and sessional orders and

forms and usages, customs and precedents of the House of Commons of Canada and

those of any province or territory in Canada; and (

c) in all cases not provided

for above, the usages, customs and precedents of the House of Commons at

Westminster in the United Kingdom.”

We all remember the precedent a few weeks ago when, in

the House by unanimous consent by all Members, the normal business day was

interrupted from the normal flow of proceedings defined by the Order Paper as we

celebrated the Grey Cup brought to the floor of the House for photos and to

allow a Minister of the Crown to speak and a tribute to the Canadian Football

League.

We granted leave for that, just as we are seeking leave

to revert to the published Order Paper today for Question Period. We also know

what the House of Commons Compendium of

Procedure states: “The House devises its own rules, develops its own

practices, and is master of its own proceedings.”

It further states: “At times, the House may choose to

depart from the rules it has made for itself by obtaining the consent of all

Members present in the Chamber. Such a suspension of the rules or usual

practices is done by what is termed ‘unanimous consent.' When unanimous consent

is sought, the Chair takes care to determine that no voice is raised in

opposition; if there is one single dissenting voice, there can be no unanimity.

Whenever the House proceeds by unanimous consent, the fact is noted in the

official record.”

Mr. Speaker, we're here in the House today at the

recall for the election of a new Speaker. Members from across the province in 40

Districts had to return to the people's House. Certainly, there is expense

related to that.

There are many issues in the province that I'm sure the

government wants to speak to. We'd certainly, as an Opposition, like to speak to

them and ask questions on issues that are arising. Therefore, I'm asking for

unanimous consent of this House to proceed to the Order Paper and proceed to

Question Period for today so the people's House can truly reflect the issues

that are outstanding today that the public would like to hear about.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Government House Leader.

MR.

A. PARSONS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I can speak on behalf of this side of the House and

say: Bring on Question Period.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

Before we proceed, I'd like to ask and seek consent from the Third Party and

from the Independent Member. Do I have consent?

MS.

MICHAEL:

Yes.

MR.

LANE:

Absolutely.

MR.

SPEAKER:

Okay, with that, ladies and gentlemen, Oral Questions.

Oral Questions

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MR.

P. DAVIS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I assure you we're well prepared for Question Period

today and hoped that the government would take that position.

Mr. Speaker, since the resignation of a senior Liberal

Cabinet minister, I ask the Premier: Has he instructed the new Finance Minister

to take a different approach to managing the provincial finances?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Premier.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

PREMIER BALL:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Today we're setting all kinds of historic records in

this House of Assembly. By the sounds of things, we have our first Speaker from

a district in Labrador.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

PREMIER BALL:

Today, we stand here and answer questions for the first time when the Members

opposite have refused to do this in this specific example that we're talking

about today, forever.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

PREMIER BALL:

Mr.

Speaker, collective bargaining within our province – we've already said that we

will enter into meaningful, productive collective bargaining sessions with our

organized members and public service. That work continues right now. We will see

the work continue and the lead person on that will be the Minister of Finance

and Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MR.

P. DAVIS:

Mr.

Speaker, we're always quite happy to ask questions and we're doing so today. I

remind the Premier that it was on May 2, 2016 that the Premier stood on his feet

in this House and said that using McInnes Cooper, bringing their advice to the

table, is important for all Newfoundlanders and Labradorians.

I ask the government today: Who made the decision to

sever ties with McInnes Cooper?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

OSBORNE:

thank the Member for his question. I made the decision, but before I even had an

opportunity to voice that decision, McInnes Cooper had themselves withdrawn

services.

This is a new day; we're starting with a fresh slate, a

clean slate. I intend to deal and to negotiate with our public sector unions in

good faith and I welcome the meetings that are coming this week and next.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MR.

P. DAVIS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Well, it cost taxpayers more than $250,000 for the

services from McInnes Cooper which the new Finance Minister has stated now is

unnecessary.

I ask the new Minister of Finance: Was it a mistake to

hire McInnes Cooper in the first place? What value did they bring now that

you've severed ties with them?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

MR.

OSBORNE:

I'm

looking forward to meeting with McInnes Cooper to see what they can provide to

me in terms of the work they've done. I'm not prepared to say that it was a

mistake. Anything that can lead to productive discussions with the unions is

valuable.

The unions had voiced concern about the use of McInnes

Cooper. I heard those concerns. McInnes Cooper had withdrawn their service, but

any advice that McInnes Cooper can provide to me or any advice that the Member

opposite – you're welcome to my office any time at all, my door is open. If you

can provide advice to me on how to move forward and have productive meetings

with the unions, I welcome that as well.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MR.

P. DAVIS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I'll ask the minister to explain exactly what benefit

taxpayers, Newfoundlanders and Labradorians, gained from spending $250,000 on

McInnes Cooper. What was gained by that?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

MR.

OSBORNE:

just said that I've yet to meet with McInnes Cooper. I will be meeting with

McInnes Cooper and they, I'm sure, will brief me on the work they've done. I'm

sure there's probably a day or maybe two days of meetings with McInnes Cooper to

get brought up to speed with what they've put forward. I look forward to that

meeting.

Until that meeting I can't comment on what McInnes

Cooper has provided. But without a question, without a doubt, I believe it was

with good intent that McInnes Cooper was hired to try and move along these

meetings.

I'm very happy with the support we have within the

Treasury Board and the resources within government and that's how we're going to

proceed.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MR.

P. DAVIS:

Well I'm glad to hear that, Mr. Speaker, because previously it was said by the

government opposite that they never had what was needed within the public

service to carry out negotiations. So I'm glad to see that change in view.

Mr. Speaker, the Premier has been in the chair for

almost two years. He oversees all the operations of government.

I respect the fact that the minister is new so I'll ask

the Premier: What benefit do Newfoundlanders and Labradorians get from McInnes

Cooper?

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Premier.

PREMIER BALL:

Mr.

Speaker, it never fails to amaze me how the Leader of the Opposition just

deliberately stays away from facts, deliberately misleading the people in our

province. It's been said many, many times.

When the negotiations started, Mr. Speaker, and the

decision was made to bring in the strategic advice from McInnes Cooper, at that

time there was a limited number of people. The resources the previous

administration had in place far outnumbered the resources that were available to

start this round of collective bargaining.

The collective bargaining now has progressed along.

Now, the minister responsible for Finance and Treasury Board is leading this and

he will lead this with the team of people that he wants to put around him. I ask

the Leader of the Opposition to stick to the facts. Stop misleading the people

of this province.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MR.

P. DAVIS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The Premier is amazed over there; he says he's amazed.

He should have a look around the province because the people of Newfoundland and

Labrador are amazed with the lack of leadership in him and his government, Mr.

Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

P. DAVIS:

Mr.

Speaker, oil prices are down below forecast and the exchange rate isn't helping.

The jobless rate is rising; the Bank of Canada rate hike won't likely do

anything to benefit Newfoundlanders and Labradorians.

Can the new Finance Minister give an updated projection

of the deficit for the current fiscal year and what, if anything, he's planning

to do to make the adjustments?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Premier.

PREMIER BALL:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Once again, the Leader of the Opposition is

deliberately excluding some of the big issues that are facing this province. Why

is it that the Leader of the Opposition just leaves out the impact of Muskrat

Falls on this province? He deliberately left it out, deliberately refused to

tell the people of this province what the impact was, hid information from the

people of this province in 2015. They needed to know.

Why did he hide the financial situation of this

province, Mr. Speaker? The Leader of the Opposition deliberately, once again,

misleading the people of the province, hiding information that he had.

Mr. Speaker, this administration has done a very good

job in putting the financial foundation in place in this province. So if he

wants to talk about leadership, why doesn't he let the people of this province

know right now: Is he running his leadership campaign where he is now? If he is,

he should resign where he is and let (inaudible).

MR.

SPEAKER:

Order, please!

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

P. DAVIS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

It's nice to know that the Premier is very interested

in what's happening with the leadership of our party, and many people are

throughout the province. I'm glad he's interested to know that, Mr. Speaker.

I'd like to point out very simply, here we are in

Question Period, they stand here and they beat their chest, oh, bring on the

questions. But they won't bring on the answers, Mr. Speaker, and we just saw it.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

P. DAVIS:

just saw it again, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, the Premier wants to talk about Muskrat

Falls. I'll be glad to talk about Muskrat Falls.

I ask the Premier: Now that the former Nalcor chair is

no longer in his Cabinet, will the Premier now to commit to undertaking a

forensic audit immediately on Muskrat Falls?

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Premier.

PREMIER BALL:

Thank you again, Mr. Speaker.

Once again, the Leader of the Opposition deliberately

doesn't want to talk about the increase in electricity rates that will be

impacted by the Muskrat Falls Project, Mr. Speaker. Now he's questioning about

the forensic audit or an inquiry into Muskrat Falls.

Well, two things I want to mention, Mr. Speaker. We've

been on record – we have been on record saying we're going to do this. This

needs to be done. That commitment has been clear.

What is not clear is why did the Leader of the

Opposition, when this project was being sanctioned, not do his own audit and not

let the people of this province have their say into this project and the impact

that it would have on the future of Newfoundland and Labrador? He deliberately

left people out in 2012 as part of the previous administration, Mr. Speaker.

Right now, all of this is gamesmanship looking for political opportunism.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MR.

P. DAVIS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Once again, the Premier rises to his feet and refuses

to answer the question that was asked.

Mr. Speaker, it's not the first time the Premier has

refused to provide information, especially about Muskrat Falls. As a matter of

fact, for months and months and months they withheld oversight reports and still

to this day refuse to release them. They also are refusing to call a forensic

audit.

I ask the Premier: The reason and refusal to release

the Oversight Committee reports, is it the same reason you're refusing to do the

audit right now?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Premier.

PREMIER BALL:

Here we go again, Mr. Speaker, misleading the people of the province, the Leader

of the Opposition deliberately misleading the people of the province. I answered

his question, Mr. Speaker, but I will answer it again, just in case.

The forensic audit or an inquiry that's required to get

to the bottom of the decision that they made and the decision that they refused

to talk about, a decision that's having a profound impact on rates in this

province, a decision that's having a profound impact on the financial situation

of this province, a forensic audit or maybe an advanced inquiry, something to

get to the bottom so the people in this province will have the answers that they

deserve, the answers to the questions that they kept from the people of our

province for nearly the whole time that this project was sanctioned in 2012 and

beyond, we will get those questions answered.

So the answer to the forensic audit is, yes – or the

inquiry – it will be done.

MR.

SPEAKER:

Order!

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

Order!

The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MR.

P. DAVIS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I'm not sure what that was. He's working hard not to

answer questions today, I can assure you. Mr. Speaker, I'm going to try the

Minister of Natural Resources.

I'm going to ask the Minister of Natural Resources:

When did she learn of and receive a copy of 2013 SNC-Lavalin report for which

they falsely claim was given to the former administration.

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Natural Resources.

MS.

COADY:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker, for the most important question.

I'm going to say this: Mr. Speaker, if they did not

receive a copy of the SNC-Lavalin report dated 2013 – which would have given

them the information to shut down that project – that is neglect.

They should have asked for it. They should have asked

for information about the risks. They should have been on top of the risk

analysis. They should have been looking for the concerns that were being raised

by the project deliver. Obviously, they didn't do it.

I can tell you, Mr. Speaker, that I did receive a copy

of the report the same day the people of this province received a copy of the

report.

Thank you.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MR.

P. DAVIS:

Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

The minister just confirmed when she received the

report and she just confirmed that the Premier's personally appointed CEO of

Nalcor withheld that very report for a full year from his own minister and from

the Premier himself.

I ask the Premier: Does that not cause you concern? Now

that your minister just confirmed that your CEO withheld it from you and your

minister for a full year, does that cause you concern, Premier?

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Natural Resources.

MS.

COADY:

Oh,

Mr. Speaker, what should cause this Legislature and this province grievous

concern is the fact that the Member opposite did not know that report was done

under his watch, did not know the contents of the risks involved. He could have

shut down the project. What did he do? Nothing.

The people of this province now have a project that is

very, very expensive, too costly for them to be able to even look at the rates

that are going to be in the province for electricity. This government is having

to rate manage, Mr. Speaker. It is because the former administration didn't know

the risk, didn't do their homework.

Mr. Speaker, we'll be happy to do an inquiry to find

out exactly what were they doing, because it wasn't managing the project

properly.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MR.

P. DAVIS:

So,

Mr. Speaker, the question here was very, very simple. The minister stands on her

feet here and likes to criticize others and throw blame across the way and so

on. I wouldn't expect anything different –

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Oh,

oh!

MR.

SPEAKER:

While I may be new to this Chair, I do understand the rules around heckling. I

would ask that Members only speak when they're recognized by the Speaker.

Thank you very much.

MR.

P. DAVIS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, what the minister opposite has stood here

and said in her rant this afternoon is that for a full year their own CEO took

it from her and prevented her from seeing it, never shared it with her, never

provided this, what she says very strongly here, very important information.

So I'll again ask the Premier: Does this not cause you

concern that this very important information was hidden from your government for

a full year?

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Natural Resources.

MS.

COADY:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

What the Premier said moments ago is absolutely true.

The Member opposite is trying to obfuscate or confuse the people of this

province.

I'm going to say it again, Mr. Speaker, the former

administration, the former CEO of Nalcor would have received that report, would

have had the report in 2013. It was done by SNC-Lavalin who was managing the

project at the time. We understand from SNC-Lavalin it was presented to the CEO

of Nalcor. All I can say is what they have told us.

I can say this, there have been multiple reports done

subsequent to the development of Muskrat Falls. There's been a lot of work done.

The CEO that currently is in place is doing an admirable job, Mr. Speaker.

MR.

SPEAKER:

Order!

MS.

COADY:

are moving towards completion in the best way possible.

MR.

SPEAKER:

Order, please!

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

Member for Ferryland.

MR.

HUTCHINGS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, in 2015 a generic royalty regime was

announced. The current administration has talked about it for some time in

regard to bringing that to. It's certainly needed in the industry. Confidence in

the industry wants the royalty regime.

I ask the minister: You indicated in the House some

time ago it was going to be March 30, 2017, there's still no generic royalty

regime. Where is it and when do we expect to get it?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Natural Resources.

MS.

COADY:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker, for the sensible question.

It is important to the people of this province to

understand where we are with the generic oil royalty regime. It is something

that we have been working on. There was a lot of work done by the former

administration; we've been working on the foundations and basics in which they

had done. A lot of work has gone into developing the regulations around that. We

expect those regulations by the fall. We are working with industry.

As the Member opposite knows, we have started an oil

and gas council – we're taking there. They're doing an awful lot of work and

looking at strategic planning as to how we develop and grow the oil and gas

industry, how do we ensure we're competitive in this increasingly global and

difficult oil and gas environment.

This has been a great year, Mr. Speaker, for new

exploration and new developments in the offshore oil and gas industry.

MR.

SPEAKER:

Order, please!

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

Member for Ferryland.

MR.

HUTCHINGS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, I'll ask the minister: On our producing

platforms right now, or basins, are you considering any changes to the current

royalty regimes that are in place now for those in production?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Natural Resources.

MS.

COADY:

Thank you again for another sensible question, Mr. Speaker.

I will say this; I was a bit surprised yesterday when I

read in the media that the Member opposite was commenting that we were having

some secretive meetings. That is not the case, Mr. Speaker, absolutely not the

case. We're hopeful that Suncor will continue to develop the Terra Nova well,

continue to move forward, but they have existing royalty regulations, they have

stability and they will continue to have so.

There are no discussions going on with any of the

operators, Mr. Speaker, to change their royalty regimes as they currently exist.

Thank you.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

Member for Ferryland.

MR.

HUTCHINGS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, Suncor senior officials, executives from

the Eastern Seaboard, have indicated that they have been in touch with

government officials. They have registered as lobbyists here in the province to

advocate for changes to royalty regimes. That is clearly indicated in the

lobbyist form that they completed, which is online.

So I ask the minister: The executives are saying they

had discussions with government; you're saying they're not. Did they have

discussions with Nalcor or who are they talking to? Because the executives are

saying they are talking to government on these royalty regimes; you say they're

not. Who is correct?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Natural Resources.

MS.

COADY:

Well, he could actually call Suncor and find that out himself, Mr. Speaker. But

I will say that Suncor – I can't comment on the registry that he's referring to.

There is a lobbyist registry. There are a lot of discussions going on about

generic oil royalty, about oil and gas council. There are a lot of things going

on.

I can't say to the specific meeting to which he is

referring, but I can say I spoke with Suncor again yesterday just to confirm

with them that they have not brought forward anything that I was not aware of,

and they again said no, there are no discussions going on with regard to royalty

or benefits with this government.

Mr. Speaker, I will say this: When they announced

Statoil, Statoil wasn't aware that there were discussions going on or

finalization of their imports either.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

Member for Ferryland.

MR.

HUTCHINGS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, almost two years and no response to

questions regarding the federal government mandated carbon tax in terms of our

oil and gas industry. When the Husky Project was announced, you said that it

wasn't included in that actual project in terms of who was going to pay for the

carbon tax.

Can you tell us today – Newfoundlanders and

Labradorians – who is going to pay for that carbon tax, Minister?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Natural Resources.

MS.

COADY:

Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

Carbon tax is quite a discussion that is happening in

our country. We all are concerned, as we should be, about global warming and

climate change, Mr. Speaker. The Province of Newfoundland and Labrador, under

the great direction of the Minister Responsible for Climate Change, is moving

toward a made-in-Newfoundland solution. I know the Premier has had multiple

discussions at the First Ministers' table concerning this.

The oil and gas industry is aware that there will be

some form of carbon tax and they are preparing for that, Mr. Speaker. As we are

moving forward in the development of a carbon tax for this province, we'll be

keeping the competitiveness and the requirements of ensuring a pristine

environment are balanced.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

Member for Ferryland.

MR.

HUTCHINGS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The announcement of the Hebron Project, the preliminary

agreement that was done prior to the current administration included two gates

in regard to the construction dock in Argentia. Most involved said that was an

over $100 million investment, would certainly support long-term investment and

work and maintenance for that facility.

They also mentioned a $60 million innovation fund,

which in fact is a loan, because the partners are able to get that back through

capital cost once the revenue flows.

So I ask the minister: Why did she give up those two

key components that were already negotiated against for the people of

Newfoundland and Labrador? Why did you let those go?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Natural Resources.

MS.

COADY:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I believe – just to correct the hon. Member – it is the

West White Rose Project he is referring to, not the Hebron Project.

I will say that the benefits and royalties around the

West White Rose Project were in place by the former administration, Mr. Speaker.

The gates to which he is referring were not required by this project. They were

driving up costs; they were not required. We had multiple discussions, of

course, with the Argentia Management Authority and the port of Argentia to

ensure that we are doing everything to entice and grow the oil and gas business

in that region.

I can tell you the people of Argentia and Placentia

and, indeed, the entire province are very pleased with the increased amount of

employment that will be had with the West White Rose. And, of course, now the

people of the province know we have $60 million that we will be able to reinvest

to continue to grow the industry.

MR.

SPEAKER:

Order please!

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

Member for Conception Bay South.

MR.

PETTEN:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, it's been a banner year for tourism, yet

vehicles are in a gridlock, bumper to bumper, waiting sometimes for hours just

to drive from point A to point B. In the past two years, the Liberals have been

promising that their early tendering would eliminate this.

I ask the minister: How many projects have been

announced this year, but are not yet started?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Transportation and Works.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

CROCKER:

Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

It is indeed an honour to stand here as the minister

responsible for Transportation and Works. Mr. Speaker, we have a $77 million

roads budget this year and there are many projects in the province that are

happening. As the Member opposite would be well aware, contractors bid on many

different projects and they start at different times. But I can assure you our

early tendering process has certainly worked, Mr. Speaker.

As the hon. Member would also know, he was there with a

government that brought out projects in September, October and November. That's

not the way we are doing it. We went into a second round of contract

announcements and tender calls this week and we'll continue to make sure the

project get underway in our province.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

Member for Conception Bay South.

MR.

PETTEN:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The Liberals promised a new approach to roadwork,

including a pilot project for nighttime paving. The paving season is quickly

coming to an end. When is the nighttime paving supposed to start?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Transportation and Works.

MR.

CROCKER:

Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

In the briefings that I've had in the short six days

I've been minister, that's one of the projects that's very important for us to

see get off the ground. It's a project that this government took on. They were

in power for 12 years and they only talked about nighttime paving. This

government is going to deliver. They did not deliver in 12 years, Mr. Speaker.

We will deliver. We will continue to deliver on road projects in this province.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

Member for St. John's East – Quidi Vidi.

MS.

MICHAEL:

Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

Newfoundland and Labrador has one of the lowest minimum

wages in Canada. Government has said it might index the minimum wage, but that

won't help these workers if the minimum wage is too low to start with.

I ask the Premier: Will he commit to bringing our

minimum wage to a non-poverty level before indexing?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Advanced Education, Skills and Labour.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

HAWKINS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

It's certainly a pleasure for me to stand today in this

new capacity and I thank the Premier for giving me this opportunity. The minimum

wage has been something that the previous minister looked at last year. We are,

in fact, making increases. There is another increase that is happening in

October of 2017. I think part of the discussion that we looked at, going

forward, is the idea of indexing.

Mr. Speaker, I have not yet had an opportunity to

really get into that file and to have any further discussions on that, but

certainly looking forward to it. I think it's important for us to all realize

that there is an engagement that has to take place. It's not just the employees.

There are employers out there. There are small business people that are out

there. So I think there is a whole discussion that we need to have on that. We

will continue to do that to make the right decision for the people in this

province.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

Member for St. John's East – Quidi Vidi.

MS.

MICHAEL:

Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

I ask the minister then: Will his government commit to

raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour, as other jurisdictions are doing, so

these workers won't be condemned to earn poverty wages forever?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Advanced Education, Skills and Labour.

MR.

HAWKINS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I think I was fairly clear in saying that, as we move

forward, there is an increase in the minimum wage coming in October of 2017.

Prior to the discussions that were made in looking at

whether we are going to be indexing that particular rate or whether we are

looking at a new rate, that's a discussion that we need to have. As I stated

earlier, it's a discussion that we need to have with consultation, not only with

employers, but also we look at small business people because there is an impact

on everybody when it comes to looking at these costs. Somewhere along the line

we have to have that discussion and we will certainly look at that, and when the

time comes for that decision, the House will certainly be aware of that.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

Member for St. John's Centre.

MS.

ROGERS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The specialized services of the family and child office

of the Legal Aid Commission in St. John's provided a multi-team approach,

especially to families dealing with the complex issues of child protection. The

closure of this office cuts the much needed services to some of the most

vulnerable families in our provinces and consequently cuts the services to some

of the most vulnerable children.

The closure of this office is similar to the closure of

the Family Violence Intervention Court. It is penny wise and pound foolish,

costing the system more money and more court time in the long run.

I ask the Minister of Justice: Will he commit the funds

necessary to re-establish the family and child office of Legal Aid in St.

John's?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Justice and Public Safety.

MR.

A. PARSONS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I'm happy to stand here and speak to legal aid, and as

the Member would know, these are decisions that are made by Legal Aid; they're

certainly not made by me as a minister. That being said, I did meet with the

board and executive of Legal Aid to discuss this and other matters this morning.

The issue simply is that we've seen an uptake in demand

as it relates to Legal Aid when it comes to criminal files, when it comes to

family files, and they had to make very difficult decisions. The fact is we have

stretched resources across the way, so that's something I've talked to them

about.

One of the issues that we see is a significant increase

when it comes to choice of counsel, so private lawyers getting legal aid money.

When you see a budget there that basically is almost doubled or tripled, that's

something that we're going to work on here. When we see private members getting

this increase, we need to figure this way out.

Thank you.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

Member for St. John's Centre.

MS.

ROGERS:

Mr.

Speaker, this is the result of budgetary decisions by this government.

Mr. Speaker, community agencies working with the family

and child office of the Legal Aid office know how valuable this office is and

state that fewer children end up in care because of the collaborative work they

do with the office and with the families and with the courts.

So I ask the minister: Will he meet with these groups

to hear their concerns about the closure of the family and child office?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Justice and Public Safety.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

A. PARSONS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The first thing I say is that the Member is wrong in

that this was a budgetary decision of this government. That's clearly not

accurate whatsoever. This was a decision that was made by Legal Aid.

The second part of my answer would be that I've already

heard from a number of these groups and I've spoken to them and I will continue

to do so. Legal aid is a necessary part of our system, one that I'm very

familiar with and know the great work that these lawyers do.

But the fact is we have financial pressures which come

from an increasing number of matters that are going through Legal Aid and the

significant amount we pay private lawyers, some of whom we see in the news every

day. When that budget doubles and triples what we're spending there, we have a

serious issue that leads to declines in other parts of the system.

Thank you.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

Member for St. John's Centre for a quick question. No

preamble, please.

MR.

ROGERS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I ask the Minister of Justice: Will he provide the

necessary resources to Legal Aid to cover the extra costs due to the high number

of murder cases so other specialized services of Legal Aid will not be cut?

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

hon. the Minister of Justice and Public Safety.

MR.

A. PARSONS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I'm always happy – again, I met with Legal Aid today to

discuss this matter, but it's not as simple as what the Member is suggesting, to

just take extra money and throw out there.

The fact is that we have resources that we have to live

within. I know Members on the other side that voted themselves a raise this

year; certainly, that wasn't an issue when we talk about Legal Aid and the money

that they need.

Thank you.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

time for Oral Questions is over.

Presenting Reports by Standing and Select Committees.

Tabling of Documents.

Notices of Motion.

Answers to Questions for which Notice has been Given.

Petitions.

Petitions

MR.

SPEAKER:

The

Member for Bell Island.

MR.

BRAZIL:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

It's the beautiful District of Conception Bay East –

Bell Island.

MR.

SPEAKER:

Conception Bay East – Bell Island. I apologize.

MR.

BRAZIL:

Bell Island is a very important part of it with our new ferry, the

Legionnaire , now in place and the dock

built and completed. My hon. Member for – I'd like to mention that. It's

wonderful – wonderful.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

BRAZIL:

Just have to allow the minister now to allow us to park on it. That's why we

built it.

Mr. Speaker, to the hon. House of Assembly of the

Province of Newfoundland and Labrador in Parliament assembled, the petition of

the undersigned residents humbly sheweth:

WHEREAS the education of children is one of the most

important and vital investments that can be made in the success of children; and

WHEREAS the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador

should be choosing educational options that will provide all students in our

province with a higher standard of education and enhance the learning experience

for our youth; and

WHEREAS the government decision to make cuts to

teachers in our education system will negatively impact the students;

WHEREUPON the undersigned, your petitioners, humbly

pray and call upon the House of Assembly to urge government to reverse these

decisions effective immediately.

Mr. Speaker, we had an opportunity in the last sitting

of the House to debate and discuss the cuts to our education system. Since then,

we've had a very intensive and a very thorough report by the task force that

outlined 82 recommendations that reflect people's view on how we improve our

educational outcomes here and how we support the education system, Mr. Speaker.

A lot of them point to things that have been cut over

the last two budgets and particularly, two budgets ago. What's being outlined

there is a reflection of people's view on knowing. If you're going to invest in

people, you have to invest in their education system.

You have to start with our young people; you have to

prepare them to be our productive citizens. You have to use the education system

to prevent other issues that may occur as they go through their lifelong

learning, particularly around mental health, physical education, financial

stability and learning, also about all the other challenges that come as part of

our education system, particularly about inclusive education.

I know we had a comprehensive inclusive education

design that ended with its implementation process the last number of months ago,

and it was determined that it wasn't as effective as we would have hoped it

would have been, and that all the stakeholders have now weighed in and said, you

know what, we need to find a better approach. The task force has outlined the

number of approaches they think would be the best way to do it.

What needs to be done now, there has to be some

prioritizing of how it's going to be done. There has to be some acknowledgement

that there has to be resources invested. There has to be an acknowledgement that

you have to look at the present resources you have within the education system

and find the best way that you can resource those, but also use them in other

areas where the priority lists need to be addressed. You also have to develop

partnerships with the private sector, the not-for-profit sector, agencies that

have expertise in those areas, and particularly the communities, on how we

better prepare our students for better outcomes.

All the information that was given, hundreds of people

presented from all different backgrounds and all different concerns within the

education system, but particularly the educators themselves, those who, day in

and day out, have assessed the challenges, what's needed, how we can better

change the process, how we can better address some of the issues. We've been

fortunate over the last decade or so that we've invested in the structural part

of it. Our school systems, from a physical point of view, are in good shape.

There's still work to be done, but they're in physically decent shape. Maybe we

need to look at our physical monies and move that into our human resource money

and our program money. They're decisions that need to be made.

As you can see by the petitioners here, Mr. Speaker,

they've outlined exactly their concerns. This now falls well in play with the

task force recommendations. The minister had pointed out at one point that the

sky is not falling; this is not an immediate thing that needs attention. Yes, it

is. This is another indication that this has to be done; it has to be addressed

immediately.

I understand you can't do all 82 recommendations

immediately but you have to prioritize. What are the immediate things that we

can do right now that will have a major impact? Or what are the things that are

the critical part of the needs in our school system to ensure our students have

better outcomes and have a better choice for their educational needs and at the

end of the day become more productive citizens and meet their full potential.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

Further petitions?

Guidance, please.

I recognize the Member for St. John's Centre.

MS.

ROGERS:

Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

To the hon. House of Assembly of the Province of

Newfoundland and Labrador in Parliament assembled, the petition of the

undersigned residents humbly sheweth:

WHEREAS government has removed the provincial

point-of-sale tax rebate on books, which will raise the tax on books from 5 per

cent to 15 per cent; and

WHEREAS an increase in the tax on books will reduce

book sales to the detriment of local bookstores, publishers and authors, and the

amount collected by government must be weighed against the loss in economic

activity caused by higher book prices; and

WHEREAS Newfoundland and Labrador has one of the lowest

literacy rates in Canada and the other provinces do not tax books because they

recognize the need to encourage reading and literacy; and

WHEREAS this province has many nationally and

internationally known storytellers, but we will be the only people in Canada who

will have to pay our provincial government a tax to read the books of our own

writers;

WHEREUPON the undersigned, your petitioners, humbly

pray and call upon the House of Assembly to urge government not to impose a

provincial sales tax on books.

And as in duty bound, your petitioners will ever pray.

Mr. Speaker, our students will be returning to school

in a month and they will be faced – particularly our students who will be

returning to MUN – with extra fees, extra costs. For some, a significant amount

of money per semester as well as the extra fees, the extra taxes on books. For

some, it will be in the hundreds of dollars, just the extra taxes alone.

Government will say about even MUN: Well, we didn't do

that, MUN is doing that. In fact, Mr. Speaker, what is happening is that

government has done that. By the last two budgets they are forcing the hands the

same way the Minister of Justice is saying: Well, I didn't make those decisions,

Legal Aid made those decisions. But their hand is forced because of the overall

budgeting afforded to some of these agencies and services to our people.

We know there is a rise in court procedures because of

the poverty and the economic stress that people are feeling. So when you look at

what's happening with our students at MUN, it isn't MUN's fault. I believe that

what's happened is that our students and MUN have been burned. They have been

burned by the last budget and that's what they're experiencing, Mr. Speaker.

Government can't sit there and wash their hands of

this. Government has a direct responsibility. They have been burned, no less

than having been burned by the economic policies of this government.

MR.

SPEAKER:

Order, please!

MS.

ROGERS:

Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Hear, hear!

MR.

SPEAKER:

recognize the Government House Leader.

MR.

A. PARSONS:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I would move at this time, after such an exciting day,

that the House do now adjourn, seconded by the Premier.

MR.

SPEAKER:

has been moved that the House do now adjourn.

All in favour?

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Aye.

MR.

SPEAKER:

Against?

SOME HON. MEMBERS:

Nay.

MR.

SPEAKER:

carried.

This House stands adjourned to the Call of the Chair.

On motion, the House adjourned to the Call of the

Chair.