U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1892

Decisions

• 1892-12-19HART v. BUCKNER et al., 54 F. 925
• 1892-12-19DUFOUR et al. v. LANG, 54 F. 913
• 1892-12-19THE CARL GUSTAF. LOXLEY et al. v. THE CARL GUSTAF et al., 53 F. 846
• 1892-12-12WINEMAN v. GASTRELL, 53 F. 697
• 1892-12-05AIKEN et al. v. SMITH, 54 F. 894
• 1892-11-25STOCKTON et al. v. RUSSELL et al., 54 F. 224
• 1892-11-01WHITNEY v. WILDER et al., 54 F. 554
• 1892-11-01TEXAS & P. RY. CO. v. KUTEMAN, 54 F. 547
• 1892-06-24Florida Land & Imp. Co. v. Merrill et al., 52 F. 77
• 1892-06-23The City of Macon. Bedouin Steam Nav. Co., Limited, v. The City of Macon et al., 51 F. 949
• 1892-06-23The Sarah. The Sarah v. Bellais, 52 F. 233
• 1892-06-23City of New Orleans v. Peake, 52 F. 74
• 1892-06-23Augusta, T. & G. R. Co. et al. v. Kittel, 52 F. 63
• 1892-06-20The Agnes I. Grace. McQuesten et al. v. Propeller Towboat Co. et al., 51 F. 958
• 1892-06-20The Main. Dennett v. The Main, 51 F. 954
• 1892-06-20Florida Southern R. Co. v. Loring, 51 F. 932
• 1892-06-20BLANKS et al. v. KLEIN et al., 53 F. 436
• 1892-06-20City of New Orleans v. Paine, 51 F. 833
• 1892-06-20Aspley v. Murphy et al., 52 F. 570
• 1892-06-20Wold et al. v. Keyser, 52 F. 169
• 1892-06-20Skantze et al. v. Keyser, 52 F. 168
• 1892-06-20Sorensen et al. v. Keyser, 52 F. 163
• 1892-06-20Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Ludlam, 52 F. 94
• 1892-06-13Eason v. East Tennessee, V. & G. Ry. Co., 51 F. 935
• 1892-06-13Bank of Edgefield v. Farmers' Co-operative Manuf'g Co., 52 F. 98
• 1892-06-12Freeman et al. v. Clay et al., 52 F. 1
• 1892-06-06The Ira B. Ellems. Otis Manuf'g Co. v. The Ira B. Ellems, 50 F. 932
• 1892-06-06Atlanta & F. R. Co. et al. v. Western Ry. Co. of Alabama et al., 50 F. 790
• 1892-06-06Coulliette et al. v. Thomason et al., 50 F. 787
• 1892-05-30Asher et al. v. Cabell et al., 50 F. 818
• 1892-05-30Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Nelson, 50 F. 814
• 1892-05-30Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. Robinson, 50 F. 810
• 1892-05-30Grant et al. v. East & West R. Co. et al., 50 F. 795
• 1892-05-30Dudley E. Jones Co. et al. v. Munger Improved Cotton Mach. Manuf'g Co., 50 F. 785
• 1892-05-30Sorensen et al. v. Keyser, 51 F. 30
• 1892-01-01Munos et al. v. Southern Pac. Co., 51 F. 188