Case
Lite
by Caseway
United States
Home
Browse
Advanced
Search
Home
/
United States
/
U.S. Federal
/
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
/
1914
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1914
96 decisions ·
Back to court
Decisions
1914-12-17
CLARK-HERRIN-CAMPBELL CO. v. H. B. CLAFLIN CO. et al., 218 F. 429
1914-12-17
ORLEANS-KENNER ELECTRIC RY. CO. v. DUNBAR, 218 F. 344
1914-12-16
BELL et al. v. ARLEDGE et al. In re LONG LEAF LUMBER CO., 219 F. 675
1914-12-15
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO. v. ALDRIDGE, 219 F. 836
1914-12-09
TEXAS & P. RY. CO. v. BIGGER et al., 218 F. 990
1914-12-09
DIETER-WENZEL CONST. CO. v. EPPLER, 218 F. 987
1914-12-09
BOMBARGER v. UNITED STATES, 219 F. 841
1914-12-09
PEOPLE'S LIGHT CO. v. RATHBUN-JONES ENGINEERING CO., 218 F. 167
1914-12-08
ILLINOIS CENT. R. CO. v. BEHRENS, 217 F. 967
1914-12-04
MEDLIN MILLING CO. v. J. ROSENBAUM GRAIN CO., 218 F. 989
1914-12-04
MEDLIN MILLING CO. v. HALL-BAKER GRAIN CO., 218 F. 989
1914-12-04
UNITED STATES, for Use of T. H. KESSLER & CO., v. TITLE GUARANTY & SURETY CO., 218 F. 67
1914-12-03
TOMLINSON et al. v. BOURN, 218 F. 991
1914-12-03
ROBERTSON et al. v. AYLOR, 218 F. 989
1914-12-02
NATIONAL SURETY CO. v. CHRISTOPHER & SIMPSON ARCHITECTURAL IRON & FOUNDRY CO., Inc., et al., 218 F. 989
1914-12-01
HUTTIG SASH & DOOR CO. v. STITT. In re TEXAS PLANING MILL & MFG. CO., 218 F. 1
1914-11-30
UNITED STATES ex rel. and to Use of TEXAS PORTLAND CEMENT CO. et al. v. McCORD et al., 218 F. 991
1914-11-30
ROLLER v. BURKETT et al., 218 F. 990
1914-11-30
GROOM v. BARRETT, 218 F. 988
1914-11-30
FIRST NAT. BANK OF WATSEKA, ILL., v. BARKLEY et al., 218 F. 988
1914-11-30
FRANKLIN v. MONNING DRY GOODS CO., 217 F. 929
1914-11-30
MARNET OIL & GAS CO. v. STALEY et al., 218 F. 45
1914-11-30
COOPER GROCERY CO. v. PARK, 218 F. 42
1914-11-09
PULLMAN CO. v. JORDAN, 218 F. 573
1914-11-03
DREYER v. PERKINS. In re PERKINS LUMBER CO., 217 F. 889
1914-11-03
GEORGIA S. & F. RY. CO. et al. v. EINSTEIN et al., 218 F. 55
1914-10-31
UNITED STATES v. BRANNAN, 217 F. 849
1914-10-30
BOWRON v. SIBERT, 218 F. 987
1914-10-30
GEORGIA & F. RY. CO. v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS et al., 217 F. 755
1914-10-29
UNITED STATES ex rel. STATE OF LOUISIANA v. BOARMAN, Judge, 217 F. 757
1914-10-29
WATTS v. UNITED STATES, 216 F. 991
1914-10-29
PADROSA v. SERRA OLIVEIRA & CO., 216 F. 991
1914-10-28
RAWLINS et al. v. HALL-EPPS CLOTHING CO. et al., 217 F. 884
1914-10-28
YARYAN NAVAL STORES CO. v. B. BORCHARDT CO. et al., 217 F. 758
1914-10-27
HUFF et al. v. BIDWELL et al.; MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF CITY OF MACON et al. v. HUFF et al., 218 F. 6
1914-10-17
LUXURY FRUIT CO. et al. v. HARRIS, 217 F. 740
1914-10-05
SOUTHERN PINE LUMBER CO. v. CONSOLIDATED LOUISIANA LUMBER CO., 217 F. 719
1914-10-05
MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO. OF NEW YORK v. POWELL, 217 F. 565
1914-10-05
FARMERS' OIL & GUANO CO. v. DUCKWORTH CO., 217 F. 362
1914-10-05
JAMES v. CLEMENTS et al., 217 F. 51
1914-10-05
PITTS BANKING CO. v. CLAYTON. In re CHANDLER, 217 F. 38
1914-05-11
SOUTH et al. v. NICROSI et al., 213 F. 1022
1914-04-28
ALEXANDER ECCLES & CO. v. LOUISVILLE & N. R. CO., 213 F. 1020
1914-04-18
METROPOLITAN BANK et al. v. SINNOTT, 213 F. 1021
1914-04-18
MARTIN v. CHAMBERS, 214 F. 769
1914-04-18
CITY OF BIRMINGHAM et al. v. BIRMINGHAM WATERWORKS CO., 213 F. 450
1914-04-16
VAN NESS v. LAYNE et al., 213 F. 804
1914-04-15
UNITED STATES v. DOULLUT, 213 F. 729
1914-04-15
ROBERTS v. KENDRICK, 211 F. 1024
1914-04-14
SLOAN et al. v. HERNDON et al., 213 F. 779
Page 1 of 2
Next