U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 1895

Decisions

• 1895-11-08BRAUN v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF BENTON COUNTY, 70 F. 369
• 1895-11-07WINDETT v. UNION MUT. LIFE INS. CO. et al., 73 F. 1023
• 1895-11-06HARMAN v. HARMAN (two cases), 70 F. 894
• 1895-10-24PEOPLE'S PURE ICE CO. et al. v. TRUMBULL et al.; TRUMBULL et al. v. FULLER et al., 70 F. 166
• 1895-10-16ODD FELLOWS FRATERNAL ACCIDENT ASS'N OF AMERICA v. EARL, 70 F. 16
• 1895-10-12BIGELOW v. NICKERSON, 70 F. 113
• 1895-10-07GOODWIN et al. v. FOX et al., 73 F. 1021
• 1895-10-07RICKORDS et al. v. CITY OF HAMMOND, 69 F. 1023
• 1895-10-07THE NEBRASKA. Appeal of MILWAUKEE DRY DOCK CO., 69 F. 1009
• 1895-10-07UNITED STATES ex rel. DEIMEL v. ARNOLD, United States Marshal; DEIMEL et al. v. STROHEIM et al., 69 F. 987
• 1895-10-07PHIPPS et al. v. HARDING, 70 F. 468
• 1895-10-07MERRILL et al. v. CHICAGO, ST. P., M. & O. R. CO., 70 F. 464
• 1895-10-07COQUARD v. INDIAN GRAVE DRAINAGE DIST. et al., 69 F. 867
• 1895-10-07BURKE et al. v. ANDERSON, 69 F. 814
• 1895-10-07SIMONDS MANUF'G CO. et al. v. E. C. ATKINS & CO., 70 F. 128
• 1895-10-07THOMSON-HOUSTON ELECTRIC CO. v. WESTERN ELECTRIC CO. et al., 70 F. 69
• 1895-07-10METCALF v. CITY OF WATERTOWN, 68 F. 859
• 1895-07-10RUSSELL v. KERN, 69 F. 94
• 1895-07-09NORTHERN PAC. R. CO. et al. v. MUSSER SAUNTRY LAND, LOGGING & MANUF'G CO. et al., 68 F. 993
• 1895-07-09AMERICAN COTTON OIL CO. v. KIRK et al., 68 F. 791
• 1895-07-09WATSON v. UNITED STATES SUGAR REFINERY et al., 68 F. 769
• 1895-07-09HALSEY et al. v. CHENEY, 68 F. 763
• 1895-05-26TOWN OF EAGLE v. HORNICK, 69 F. 1023
• 1895-05-21CLARK v. FIVE HUNDRED AND FIVE THOUSAND FEET OF LUMBER et al., 70 F. 1020
• 1895-05-11WELLS GLASS CO. et al. v. HENDERSON, 67 F. 930
• 1895-05-11PITTSBURGH, C., C. & ST. L. RY. CO. v. RUSS, 67 F. 662
• 1895-05-08ATCHISON, T. & S. F. R. CO. v. MULLIGAN, 67 F. 569
• 1895-04-08TERRE HAUTE & I. R. CO. v. MANSBERGER, 67 F. 67
• 1895-03-22DE LA VERGNE BOTTLE & SEAL CO. v. VALENTINE BLATZ BREWING CO. et al., 66 F. 765
• 1895-03-20CHICAGO DOLLAR DIRECTORY CO. et al. v. CHICAGO DIRECTORY CO., 66 F. 977
• 1895-03-20COLMAN v. UNITED STATES, 66 F. 695
• 1895-03-20MERRIMAN et al. v. CHICAGO & E. I. R. CO. et al., 66 F. 663
• 1895-03-20DISTILLING & CATTLE FEEDING CO. v. GOTTSCHALK CO., 66 F. 609
• 1895-02-23JOHNSON v. OLSEN, 69 F. 1022
• 1895-02-23RHODES v. UNITED STATES NAT. BANK, 66 F. 512
• 1895-02-23CHICAGO, M. & ST. P. R. CO. v. WALLACE, 66 F. 506
• 1895-02-23McLEOD et al. v. CITY OF NEW ALBANY, 66 F. 378
• 1895-02-23CAVERLY v. DEERE et al., 66 F. 305
• 1895-01-26FARMERS' LOAN & TRUST CO. v. GRAPE CREEK COAL CO. et al., 65 F. 717
• 1895-01-26LAUGHLIN v. CALUMET & CHICAGO CANAL & DOCK CO. et al., 65 F. 441
• 1895-01-18DAVIS & RANKIN BLDG. & MANUF'G CO. v. DRIVER, 69 F. 1022
• 1895-01-18CABOT v. McMASTER, 65 F. 533
• 1895-01-18GEORGE ERTEL CO. v. STAHL, 65 F. 519
• 1895-01-18GEORGE ERTEL CO. v. STAHL, 65 F. 517
• 1895-01-18CHICAGO DOLLAR DIRECTORY CO. et al. v. CHICAGO DIRECTORY CO., 65 F. 463
• 1895-01-14THE NEBRASKA. In re PRINGLE, 75 F. 598
• 1895-01-14PITTSBURGH, C. & ST. L. R. CO. et al. v. KEOKUK & H. BRIDGE CO., 68 F. 19
• 1895-01-14TERRE HAUTE & I. R. CO. v. MANSBERGER, 65 F. 196
• 1895-01-11ELGIN WIND POWER & PUMP CO. v. NICHOLS et al., 65 F. 215
• 1895-01-11UNITED STATES v. MORTON, Clerk of Court, 65 F. 204