Cartwright Act: violations.
AB 325
California Bills
20250AB__032590CHP INTRODUCED 2025-01-27 AMENDED_ASSEMBLY 2025-03-10 AMENDED_ASSEMBLY 2025-04-09 AMENDED_ASSEMBLY 2025-04-24 AMENDED_ASSEMBLY 2025-05-29 AMENDED_SENATE 2025-06-19 AMENDED_SENATE 2025-08-29 AMENDED_SENATE 2025-09-05 PASSED_ASSEMBLY 2025-09-12 PASSED_SENATE 2025-09-11 ENROLLED 2025-09-16 CHAPTERED 2025-10-06 APPROVED 2025-10-06 FILED 2025-10-06 2025 AB CHP CHP 0 Introduced by Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry (Coauthor: Assembly Member Ward) LEAD_AUTHOR ASSEMBLY Aguiar-Curry COAUTHOR ASSEMBLY Ward
An act to add Sections and 16756.1 to the Business and Professions Code, relating to business regulations. business regulations Cartwright Act: violations. Existing law establishes the Attorney General as the head of the Department of Justice, with charge of all legal matters in which the state is interested, except as specified. Existing law imposes various requirements on the Attorney General related to consumer protection, including, among others, the supervision of charitable trusts and the enforcement of antitrust laws.
Existing law, commonly known as the Cartwright Act, identifies certain acts that are unlawful restraints of trade and unlawful trusts and prescribes provisions for its enforcement. Existing law requires a complaint or cross-complaint to contain, among other things, a statement of facts constituting the cause of action, in ordinary and concise language.
This bill would instead provide that in a complaint for any violation of the Cartwright Act, it is sufficient to contain factual allegations demonstrating that the existence of a contract, combination in the form of a trust, or conspiracy to restrain trade or commerce is plausible. The bill would provide that a complaint for any violation of the Cartwright Act is not required to allege facts tending to exclude the possibility of independent action.
This bill would also make it unlawful for a person to use or distribute a common pricing algorithm as part of a contract, combination in the form of a trust, or conspiracy to restrain trade or commerce. The bill would make it unlawful for a person to use or distribute a common pricing algorithm if the person coerces another person to set or adopt a recommended price or commercial term recommended by the common pricing algorithm for the same or similar products or services in the jurisdiction of the state.
Because the bill would expand the scope of activities prohibited by the Cartwright Act, the violation of which is punishable as a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. MAJORITY NO YES YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section is added to the Business and Professions Code , to read: 16729. (
a) It shall be unlawful for a person to use or distribute a common pricing algorithm as part of a contract, combination in the form of a trust, or conspiracy to restrain trade or commerce in violation of this chapter. (
b) It shall be unlawful for a person to use or distribute a common pricing algorithm if the person coerces another person to set or adopt a recommended price or commercial term recommended by the common pricing algorithm for the same or similar products or services in the jurisdiction of this state. (
c) Nothing in this
section shall impair or limit the applicability of antitrust laws. (
d) For purposes of this section, the following
definitions apply: (1) “Antitrust laws” means the provisions of this part. (2) “Commercial term” includes, without limitation, any of the following: (
A) Level of service. (
B) Availability. (
C) Output, including quantities of products produced or distributed or the amount or level of service provided. (3) “Common pricing algorithm” means any methodology, including a computer, software, or other technology, used by two or more persons, that uses competitor data to recommend, align, stabilize, set, or otherwise influence a price or commercial term. (4) “Distribute,” “distribution,” and “distributing” include selling, licensing, providing access to, or otherwise making available by any means, including through a subscription or the sale of a service. (5) “Person” has the same meaning as defined in
Section and does not include the end consumer of a product or service. (6) “Price” means the amount of money or other thing of value, whether tangible or not, expected, required, or given in payment for any product or service, including compensation paid to an employee or independent contractor for services provided.
SEC.
Section 16756.1 is added to the Business and Professions Code , to read: 16756.1. Notwithstanding any other law, in a complaint for any violation of this chapter, it is sufficient to contain factual allegations demonstrating that the existence of a contract, combination in the form of a trust, or conspiracy to restrain trade or commerce is plausible, and the complaint shall not be required to allege facts tending to exclude the possibility of independent action.
SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
Section of
Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of