Conservatorship Of The Person Estate Of

Cal. Form GC-335

California Superior Local Rules

CONFIDENTIAL Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California GC-335 [Rev.

January 1, 2025] CONFIDENTIAL CAPACITY ASSESSMENT AND DECLARATION—PROBATE CONSERVATORSHIP Probate Code, §§ 811–813, 1880–1891, 2356.5, 2357 GC-335 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY STATE BAR NUMBER: NAME: FIRM NAME: STREET ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: FAX NO.: EMAIL ADDRESS: ATTORNEY FOR (name): SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF BRANCH NAME: CITY AND ZIP CODE: STREET ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: CONSERVATORSHIP OF THE PERSON ESTATE OF (name): CONSERVATEE PROPOSED CONSERVATEE CONFIDENTIAL CAPACITY ASSESSMENT AND DECLARATION—PROBATE CONSERVATORSHIP FOR COURT USE ONLY FILE IN CONFIDENTIAL FOLDER CASE NUMBER: HEARING DATE: TIME: DEPT. or ROOM: This form is intended to record the results of a capacity assessment of the person named in item 2, to describe the assessing clinician's conclusions about the person's mental functioning and capacity, and to submit the results and conclusions under oath to the court.

The petitioner completes items 1 and 2 to give instructions to the clinician. The clinician completes the remainder of the form. PETITIONER'S INSTRUCTIONS TO CLINICIAN 1. Assessments requested. In addition to completing Parts I and II (pages 2–4), please complete the following items in

Part III (pages 5–6) to assess the person's ability to perform the action or capacity to make the decision indicated (check all that apply): a. Item 20: Give or withhold informed consent to medical treatment specified in the petition. (Prob. Code, §§ 811, 813, 2357.) b. Item 21: Give or withhold informed consent to medical treatment generally. (Id., §§ 811, 1880–1891, 2355.) c. Item 22: Give or withhold informed consent to placement in a secured-perimeter (locked) residential care facility for the elderly. (Id., §§ 811, 2356.5.) d.

Item 23: Give or withhold informed consent to administration of medication appropriate for care and treatment of major neurocognitive disorders (e.g., dementia). (Id., §§ 811, 813, 2356.5.) Note to petitioner: Provide a copy of the petition to the clinician who will be assessing the person named in item 2 for the clinician's reference. Do not attach Confidential Supplemental Information (form GC-312). Person to be assessed2. a. Name: b. Address: Telephone number: Email address: c. Date of birth: d. Highest level of education completed (grade or degree): e.

Marital or partnership status: single married/partnered dissolved widowed f. Preferred language: speaks reads writes TO THE CLINICIAN: Provide your contact and license information below. 3. a. Name: b. Office address: Telephone number: Email address: 4. a. I am a California-licensed physician. License no: I am a California-licensed psychologist practicing within the scope of my license. I have at least two years' experience diagnosing major neurocognitive disorders (including dementia). b. License no: c. I have been practicing as a licensed physician or psychologist for years. Page 1 of 6

CONFIDENTIAL GC-335 [Rev. January 1, 2025] CONFIDENTIAL CAPACITY ASSESSMENT AND DECLARATION—PROBATE CONSERVATORSHIP GC-335 CONSERVATORSHIP OF THE PERSON ESTATE OF (name): CONSERVATEE PROPOSED CONSERVATEE CASE NUMBER: Information about the assessment 5. a. The person named in item 2 is is not a patient under my continuing care and treatment. b. I have known this person for (specify length of time in months or years): 6. a. Date of the examination on which this assessment is based or, if based on multiple examinations, the date I most recently examined the person: b. Time spent in most recent examination: 7.

My responses to the questions and prompts on this form are based on (check all that apply): a. My examination of this person for the purpose of assessing the person's abilities and capacities. b. Multiple examinations of this person for purposes of general health care and medical treatment. c. Administration of standardized examinations or tools that measure the person's mental functioning. All tests administered and dates of administration are listed below in Attachment 7c. d. My review of the person's medical records. e. Discussions with other practitioners responsible for providing health care to the person.

These discussions are described below in Attachment 7e. f. Discussions with team members or other professionals who participated in the person's assessment. These discussions are described below in Attachment 7f. g. Discussions with the person's family or friends; names and relationships are given below in Attachment 7g. h. Other sources of information, which are described below in Attachment 7h.

REPORT OF ASSESSMENT If a question or prompt does not apply to an ability or capacity checked in item 1 or your assessment does not address a question or prompt, please check the appropriate box in that item or, if there is no box, leave the item blank. Secure or destroy your copy of the petition. Do not send it to the court.

PART I. GENERAL PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH This part describes the general state of the physical and mental health of the person named in item 2. Information focused on the effect of the person's health on their mental function is given in items 16–18. 8. Physical health Overall physical health is:a. Excellent Good Fair Poor I don't know b. Overall physical health is likely to: Improve Remain stable Deteriorate I don't know The person should be reevaluated in weeks. c. Chronic conditions that require ongoing care and treatment are listed below in Attachment 8c. 9. Mental health a.

Overall mental health is: Excellent Good Fair Poor I don't know b. Overall mental health is likely to: Improve Remain stable Deteriorate I don't know The person should be reevaluated in weeks. c. All known diagnosed mental health disorders (current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) are listed below in Attachment 9c. Page 2 of 6

CONFIDENTIAL GC-335 [Rev. January 1, 2025] CONFIDENTIAL CAPACITY ASSESSMENT AND DECLARATION—PROBATE CONSERVATORSHIP GC-335 CONSERVATORSHIP OF THE PERSON ESTATE OF (name): CONSERVATEE PROPOSED CONSERVATEE CASE NUMBER:

PART II. MENTAL FUNCTIONING This part documents the existence and extent of any deficits found by my assessment of the mental functioning of the person described in item 2. Deficits are indicated in items 10–14 as follows: a = no deficit; b = mild deficit; c = moderate deficit; d = major deficit or no function; e = not applicable or not assessed 10. Alertness and attention (ability to recognize and react to a stimulus) a. Level of arousal or consciousness (deficit may be shown by lethargy, lack of response without constant stimulation, or stupor) a b c d e b. Orientation to:

(1) Time (When? Year, month, day, hour) a b c d e

(2) Place (Where? State, city, address) a b c d e

(3) Person (Who? Name, relationship) a b c d e Situation (What? How? Why?)(4) a b c d e c. Ability to attend to and concentrate on tasks (ability to attend to a stimulus; concentrate on a stimulus over brief time periods) a b c d e Notes: 11. Information processing a. Memory

(1) Immediate recall a b c d e

(2) Short-term memory and learning (the ability to encode, store, and retrieve information) a b c d e

(3) Long-term memory (ability to remember information from the past) a b c d e b. Understanding (the ability to receive and accurately process information given in written, spoken, visual, or other media) a b c d e c. Communication (the ability to express oneself and indicate preferences in speech, writing, signs, pictures, etc.) a b c d e d. Visual-spatial reasoning (recognition of familiar objects; spatial perception, problem solving, and design) a b c d e e. Quantitative reasoning (the ability to understand basic quantities and make simple calculations) a b c d e f.

Verbal reasoning (the ability to compare options, to reason using abstract concepts, and to reason logically about outcomes) a b c d e g. Executive functioning (the ability to plan, organize, and carry out actions (assuming physical ability) in one's own rational self-interest) a b c d e Notes: 12. Thought processes a. Organization of thinking (deficit may be demonstrated by severely disorganized, nonsensical, or incoherent thinking) a b c d e b. Correspondence of thoughts to reality (deficit may be demonstrated by hallucinations or delusions) a b c d e c.

Control of thoughts (deficit may be demonstrated by uncontrollable, repetitive, or intrusive thoughts) a b c d e Notes: Page 3 of 6

CONFIDENTIAL GC-335 [Rev. January 1, 2025] CONFIDENTIAL CAPACITY ASSESSMENT AND DECLARATION—PROBATE CONSERVATORSHIP GC-335 CONSERVATORSHIP OF THE PERSON ESTATE OF (name): CONSERVATEE PROPOSED CONSERVATEE CASE NUMBER: a = no deficit; b = mild deficit; c = moderate deficit; d = major deficit or no function; e = not applicable or not assessed 13.

Ability to modulate mood and affect (deficit may be demonstrated by pervasive and persistent or recurrent mood or affect inappropriate in kind or degree to the circumstances) a b c d e Notes: Ability to accept and cooperate with appropriate care or assistance (deficit may be demonstrated by inability to acknowledge illness or disorder, acting without regard for consequences, or inability or refusal to accept appropriate care) 14. a b c d e Notes: 15.

Variation (some or all of the deficits noted above vary in frequency, severity, or duration): Yes No I don't know Variation of deficits is described below in Attachment 15. Possible Temporary or Reversible Causes of Mental Function Deficits 16. Medications a. Is the person currently taking any medication—prescription or nonprescription—that may impair the person's mental functioning? Yes No I don't know Not applicable If yes, each of those medications, with dosage and treatment indications, is listed below in Attachment 16a. Name Dosage/Schedule Indications b.

An explanation of the nature and severity of the impairment that each listed medication can cause is given below in Attachment 16b No medications listed. 17. Reversible causes Have temporary or reversible causes of mental impairment been considered, assessed, diagnosed, or treated? All causes considered are discussed Yes No I don't know below in Attachment 17. 18.

Physical or emotional factors Are there physical or emotional factors (e.g., hearing, vision, or speech impairment; bereavement; or others) present that could diminish the person's capabilities and that could improve with time, treatment, or assistive devices? Yes No I don't know Applicable physical or emotional factors are described below in Attachment 18. Effect on Ability to Perform Everyday Activities 19.

In my professional opinion, the mental function deficits, if any, identified in items 10–14 will will not significantly impair the person's ability to perform some or all activities of daily living (e.g., eating, cooking, toileting, bathing, dressing) or instrumental activities of daily living (e.g., shopping, scheduling appointments, paying bills, using a credit card or checks, taking medication). More details about specific activities and reasons for my opinion are given (check all that apply): below in Attachment 19 in the attached Everyday Activities Attachment (form GC-335A).

I do not have enough information to form an opinion on this issue. Page 4 of 6

CONFIDENTIAL GC-335 [Rev. January 1, 2025] CONFIDENTIAL CAPACITY ASSESSMENT AND DECLARATION—PROBATE CONSERVATORSHIP GC-335 CONSERVATORSHIP OF THE PERSON ESTATE OF (name): CONSERVATEE PROPOSED CONSERVATEE CASE NUMBER:

PART III. CAPACITY TO GIVE OR WITHHOLD INFORMED CONSENT This part documents my professional conclusions about each issue checked in item 1. The conclusions are based on my assessment of the level of the person's mental functions described in

Part II. 20. Capacity to give or withhold informed consent to medical treatment specified in the petition (Probate Code, § 2357.) The following medical treatment has been recommended for the person (describe): Based on my assessment of the person's applicable mental functions and abilities, it is my professional opinion that: a. The person has the capacity to give or withhold informed consent to the recommended medical treatment because the person can do all of the following: (1) respond knowingly and intelligently to questions about the treatment; (2) participate in the treatment decision by means of a rational thought process; and (3) understand (

A) the nature and seriousness of the diagnosed disorder, (

B) the nature of the recommended treatment, (

C) the probable degree and duration of and benefits and risks of the recommended treatment, (

D) the consequences of lack of treatment, and (

E) the nature, risks, and benefits of any reasonable alternatives to the recommended treatment. b. The person lacks the capacity to give or withhold informed consent to the recommended medical treatment because the person cannot do at least one of the following: (1) respond knowingly and intelligently to questions about the treatment, (2) participate in the treatment decision by means of a rational thought process, or (3) understand at least one of the following: (

A) the nature and seriousness of the diagnosed disorder, (

B) the nature of the recommended treatment, (

C) the probable degree and duration of and benefits and risks of the recommended treatment, (

D) the consequences of lack of treatment, or (

E) the nature, risks, and benefits of any reasonable alternatives to the recommended treatment. These conclusions are further explained below in Attachment 20b. c. I do not have enough information to form an opinion on this issue. 21. Capacity to give or withhold informed consent to medical treatment generally (Probate Code, §§ 811, 1881.) Based on my assessment of the person's applicable mental functions and abilities, it is my professional opinion that: a.

The person has the capacity to give or withhold informed consent to medical treatment because the person can do all of the following: (1) respond knowingly and intelligently to questions about at least some forms of medical treatment; (2) participate in at least some treatment decisions by means of a rational thought process; and (3) understand (

A) the nature and seriousness of some diagnosed disorders, (

B) the nature of some recommended treatments, (

C) the probable degree and duration of and benefits and risks of at least some forms of treatment, (

D) the consequences of lack of at least some forms of treatment, and (

E) the nature, risks, and benefits of any reasonable alternatives to at least some forms of treatment. b. The person lacks the capacity to give or withhold informed consent to any form of medical treatment because either (1) the person is unable to respond knowingly and intelligently to questions about their medical treatment or (2) the person is unable to participate in treatment decisions by means of a rational thought process, which means the person cannot understand at least one of the following: (

A) the nature and seriousness of any illness, disorder, or defect that they have or may develop; (

B) the nature of any medical treatment that is or may be recommended by their health-care providers; (

C) the probable degree and duration of any benefits and risks of any medical intervention that is or may be recommended by the person's health-care providers and the consequences of lack of treatment; or (

D) the nature, risks, and benefits of any reasonable alternatives. The person's lack of capacity to give or withhold informed consent is linked to one or more mental function deficits described in

Part II. These conclusions are further explained below in Attachment 21b. c. I do not have enough information to form an opinion on this issue. Page 5 of 6

CONFIDENTIAL GC-335 [Rev. January 1, 2025] CONFIDENTIAL CAPACITY ASSESSMENT AND DECLARATION—PROBATE CONSERVATORSHIP Page 6 of 6 GC-335 CONSERVATORSHIP OF THE PERSON ESTATE OF (name): CONSERVATEE PROPOSED CONSERVATEE CASE NUMBER: 22. Capacity to give or withhold informed consent to placement in a secured-perimeter residential facility for persons with major neurocognitive disorders (Probate Code, § 2356.5.) a. The person has a major neurocognitive disorder (such as dementia) as defined in the current edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. See

Part I of this form for more information. b. The person needs or would benefit from placement in a restricted and secure environment for the reasons (for example, wandering, violence, or rejecting care) explained below in Attachment 22b. c. Based on my assessment of the person's relevant mental functions and abilities, it is my professional opinion that:

(1) The person has the capacity to give or withhold informed consent to this placement.

(2) The person lacks the capacity to give or withhold informed consent to this placement. The mental function deficit or deficits described in

Part II significantly impair the (proposed) conservatee's ability to understand and appreciate the consequences of giving consent to placement in a restricted, secured-perimeter residential facility. These conclusions are further explained below in Attachment 22c. d. The proposed placement in a locked or secured-perimeter facility is is not the least restrictive environment appropriate to the person's needs. e. I do not have enough information to form an opinion on this issue. 23.

Capacity to give or withhold informed consent to administration of medication for treatment of major neurocognitive disorders (Probate Code, § 2356.5.) a. The person has a major neurocognitive disorder (such as dementia) as defined in the current edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. See

Part I of this form for more information. b. The person needs or would benefit from appropriate medications for the care and treatment of major neurocognitive disorders (including dementia). Any medications and the need or potential benefit of each are described below in Attachment 23b. c. Based on my assessment of the person's relevant mental functions and abilities, it is my professional opinion that:

(1) The person has the capacity to give or withhold informed consent to the administration of medications appropriate for the care and treatment of major neurocognitive disorders (including dementia).

(2) The person lacks the capacity to give or withhold informed consent to the administration of medications appropriate to the care and treatment of major neurocognitive disorders (including dementia). The mental function deficit or deficits described in

Part III significantly impair the (proposed) conservatee's ability to understand and appreciate the consequences of giving consent to the administration of medications for the care and treatment of major neurocognitive disorders (including dementia). These conclusions are further explained below in Attachment 23c. d. I do not have enough information to form an opinion on this issue. 24.

Other information regarding my assessment of the person's mental functions, any deficits in those functions, and any resulting significant impairments to the person's ability to understand and appreciate the consequences of acts or decisions is given in Attachment 24. 25. Number of pages attached: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

Document details

Collection	California Superior Local Rules
Citation	Cal. Form GC-335
Type	court_rule
Language	en
Format	pdf
Source	CA_LOCAL
Identifier	0f9ed971008cb84e6348207f535aa4bde3b214ae

Source file is stored in the law ingest library (pdf).