CALIFORNIA CODE OF JUDICIAL ETHICS 1

193ed2d7599a3b3c5c8b7c683f332716ed5c9359

California Superior Local Rules

1 CALIFORNIA CODE OF JUDICIAL ETHICS 1 2 Amended by the Supreme Court of California effective July 1, 2020; adopted effective 3 January 15, 1996; previously amended March 4, 1999, December 13, 2000, December 4 30, 2002, June 18, 2003, December 22, 2003, January 1, 2005, June 1, 2005, July 1, 5 2006, January 1, 2007, January 1, 2008, April 29, 2009, January 1, 2013, January 21, 6 2015, August 19, 2015, and December 1, 2016, and October 10, 2018. 7 8 Preface 9 10

Preamble 11 12 Terminology 13 14 Canon 1. A judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary. 15 16 Canon 2. A judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of 17 the judge’s activities. 18 19 Canon 3. A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially, competently, 20 and diligently. 21 22 Canon 4. A judge shall so conduct the judge’s quasi-judicial and extrajudicial activities 23 as to minimize the risk of conflict with judicial obligations. 24 25 Canon 5.

A judge or candidate for judicial office shall not engage in political or 26 campaign activity that is inconsistent with the independence, integrity, or impartiality 27 of the judiciary. 28 29 Canon 6. Compliance with the Code of Judicial Ethics. 30 31

2 PREFACE 1 2 Formal standards of judicial conduct have existed for more than 65 years. The original 3 Canons of Judicial Ethics promulgated by the American Bar Association were modified 4 and adopted in 1949 for application in California by the Conference of California Ju dges 5 (now the California Judges Association). 6 7 In 1969, the American Bar Association determined that then current needs and problems 8 warranted revision of the canons.

In the revision process, a special American Bar 9 Association committee, headed by former California Chief Justice Roger Traynor, sought 10 and considered the views of the bench and bar and other interested persons.

The 11 American Bar Association Code of Judicial Conduct was adopted by the House of 12 Delegates of the American Bar Association August 16, 1972. 13 14 Effective January 5, 1975, the California Judges Association adopted a new California 15 Code of Judicial Conduct adapted from the American Bar Association 1972 Model Code. 16 The California code was recast in gender-neutral form in 1986. 17 18 In 1990, the American Bar Association Model Code was further revised after a lengthy 19 study.

The California Judges Association again reviewed the model code and adopted a 20 revised California Code of Judicial Conduct on October 5, 1992. 21 22 Proposition 190 (amending Cal. Const., art. VI, § 18, subd. (m), operative March 1, 1995) 23 created a new constitutional provision that states, “The Supreme Court shall make rules 24 for the conduct of judges, both on and off the bench, and for judicial candidates in the 25 conduct of their campaigns.

These rules shall be referred to as the Code of Judicial 26 Ethics.” 27 28 The Supreme Court formally adopted the 1992 Code of Judicial Conduct in March 1995, 29 as a transitional measure pending further review. 30 31 The Supreme Court formally adopted the Code of Judicial Ethics effective January 15, 32 1996. 33 34 The Supreme Court has formally adopted amendments to the Code of Judicial Ethics on 35 several occasions. The Advisory Committee Commentary is published by the Supreme 36 Court Advisory Committee on the Code of Judicial Ethics. 37 38

PREAMBLE 1 2 Our legal system is based on the principle that an independent, fair, and competent 3 judiciary will interpret and apply the laws that govern us. The role of the judiciary is 4 central to American concepts of justice and the rule of law. Intrinsic to this code are the 5 precepts that judges, individually and collectively, must respect and honor the judicial 6 office as a public trust and must strive to enhance and maintain confidence in our legal 7 system.

The judge is an arbiter of facts and law for the resolution of disputes and is a 8 highly visible member of government under the rule of law. 9 10 The Code of Judicial Ethics (“code”) establishes standards for ethical conduct of judges 11 on and off the bench and for candidates for judicial office.* The code consists of broad 12 declarations called canons, with subparts, and a terminology section. Following many 13 canons is a commentary

section prepared by the Supreme Court Advisory Committee on 14 the Code of Judicial Ethics. The commentary, by explanation and example, provides 15 guidance as to the purpose and meaning of the canons. The commentary does not 16 constitute additional rules and should not be so construed. All members of the judiciary 17 must comply with the code. Compliance is required to preserve the integrity* of the 18 bench and to ensure the confidence of the public. 19 20 The canons should be read together as a whole, and each provision should be construed in 21 context and consistent with every other provision.

They are to be applied in conformance 22 with constitutional requirements, statutes, other court rules, and decisional law. Nothing 23 in the code shall either impair the essential independence* of judges in making judicial 24 decisions or provide a separate basis for civil liability or criminal prosecution. 25 26 The code governs the conduct of judges and candidates for judicial office* and is binding 27 upon them.

Whether disciplinary action is appropriate, and the degree of discipline to be 28 imposed, requires a reasoned application of the text and consideration of such factors as 29 the seriousness of the transgression, if there is a pattern of improper activity, and the 30 effect of the improper activity on others or on the judicial system. 31 32

4 TERMINOLOGY 1 2 Terms explained below are noted with an asterisk (*) in the canons where they appear. In 3 addition, the canons in which these terms appear are cited after the explanation of each 4 term below. 5 6 “Candidate for judicial office” is a person seeking election to or retention of a judicial 7 office. A person becomes a candidate for judicial office as soon as he or she makes a 8 public announcement of candidacy, declares or files as a candidate with the election 9 authority, or authorizes solicitation or acceptance of contributions or support. See 10

Preamble and Canons 3B(9) (Commentary), 3E(2)(b)(i), 3E(3)(a), 5, 5A, 5A 11 (Commentary), 5B(1), 5B(2), 5B(3), 5B(4), 5B (Commentary), 5B(4) (Commentary), 5C, 12 5D, and 6E. 13 14 “Fiduciary” includes such relationships as executor, administrator, trustee, and guardian. 15 See Canons 3E(5)(d), 4E(1), 4E(2), 4E(3), 4E (Commentary), 6B, and 6F (Commentary). 16 17 “Gender identity” means a person’s internal sense of being male, female, a combination 18 of male and female, or neither male nor female.

See Canons 2C, 2C (Commentary), 19 3B(5), 3B(6), 3C(1), and 3C(3). 20 21 “Gender expression” is the way people communicate or externally express their gender 22 identity to others, through such means as pronouns used, clothing, appearance, and 23 demeanor.

See Canons 2C, 2C (Commentary), 3B(5), 3B(6), 3C(1), and 3C(3). 24 25 “Gift” means anything of value to the extent that consideration of equal or greater value 26 is not received, and includes a rebate or discount in the price of anything of value unless 27 the rebate or discount is made in the regular course of business to members of the public 28 without regard to official status.

See Canons 4D(5), 4D(5) (Commentary), 4D(6), 29 4D(6)(a), 4D(6)(b), 4D(6)(b) (Commentary), 4D(6)(d), 4D(6)(f), 4D(6)(i), 4D(6)(i) 30 (Commentary), 4D(6) and 4D(7) (Commentary), 4H (Commentary), 5A (Commentary), 31 5B(4) (Commentary), 6D(2)(c), and 6D(7). 32 33 “Impartial,” “impartiality,” and “impartially” mean the absence of bias or prejudice in 34 favor of, or against, particular parties or classes of parties, as well as the maintenance of 35 an open mind in considering issues that may come before a judge.

See Canons 1, 1 36 (Commentary), 2A, 2 and 2A (Commentary), 2B (Commentary), 2C (Commentary), 3, 37 3B(9) (Commentary), 3B(10) (Commentary), 3B(12), 3B(12) (Commentary), 3C(1), 38 3C(5), 3E(4)(b), 3E(4)(c), 4A(1), 4A (Commentary), 4C(3)(b) (Commentary), 4C(3)(c) 39 (Commentary), 4D(1) (Commentary), 4D(6)(a) (Commentary), 4D(6)(b) (Commentary), 40 4D(6)(g) (Commentary), 4D(6)(i) (Commentary), 4H (Commentary), 5, 5A, 5A 41 (Commentary), 5B (Commentary), 5B(4) (Commentary), 6D(2)(a), and 6D(3)(a)(vii). 42

5 “Impending proceeding” is a proceeding or matter that is imminent or expected to occur 1 in the near future. The words “proceeding” and “matter” are used interchangeably, and 2 are intended to have the same meaning. See Canons 2 and 2A (Commentary), 3B(7), 3 3B(7)(a), 3B(9), 3B(9) (Commentary), 4H (Commentary), and 6D(6). “Pending 4 proceeding” is defined below. 5 6 “Impropriety” includes conduct that violates the law, court rules, or provisions of this 7 code, as well as conduct that undermines a judge’s independence, integrity, or 8 impartiality.

See Canons 2, 2 and 2A (Commentary), 2B (Commentary), 2C 9 (Commentary), 3B(9) (Commentary), 4D(1)(b) (Commentary), 4D(6)(g) (Commentary), 10 4D(6)(i) (Commentary), 4H, and 5. 11 12 “Independence” means a judge’s freedom from influence or control other than as 13 established by law. See

Preamble, Canons 1, 1 (Commentary), 2C, 4C(2) (Commentary), 14 4D(6)(a) (Commentary), 4D(6)(g) (Commentary), 4D(6)(i) (Commentary), 4H(3) 15 (Commentary), 5, 5A (Commentary), 5B (Commentary), and 6D(1). 16 17 “Integrity” means probity, fairness, honesty, uprightness, and soundness of character. 18 See

Preamble, Canons 1, 1 (Commentary), 2A, 2 and 2A (Commentary), 2B 19 (Commentary), 2C (Commentary), 3B(9) (Commentary), 3C(1), 3C(5), 4D(6)(a) 20 (Commentary), 4D(6)(b) (Commentary), 4D(6)(g) (Commentary), 4D(6)(i) 21 (Commentary), 4H (Commentary), 5, 5A (Commentary), 5B (Commentary), and 6D(1). 22 23 “Knowingly,” “knowledge,” “known,” and “knows” mean actual knowledge of the fact in 24 question. A person’s knowledge may be inferred from circumstances.

See Canons 25 2B(2)(b), 2B(2)(e), 2C (Commentary), 3B(2) (Commentary), 3B(7)(a), 3B(7)(a) 26 (Commentary), 3D(2), 3D(5), 3E(5)(f), 5B(1)(b), 6D(3)(a)(i), 6D(3)(a) (Commentary), 27 6D(4) (Commentary), and 6D(5)(a). 28 29 “Law” means constitutional provisions, statutes, court rules, and decisional law.

See 30 Canons 1 (Commentary), 2A, 2C (Commentary), 3A, 3B(2), 3B(7), 3B(7)(c), 3B(8), 31 3B(8) (Commentary), 3B(12) (Commentary), 3E(1), 4C(3)(c) (Commentary), 4 F, and 32 4H. 33 34 “Law, the legal system, or the administration of justice.” When a judge engages in an 35 activity that relates to the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice, the judge 36 should also consider factors such as whether the activity upholds the integrity, 37 impartiality, and independence of the judiciary (Canons 1 and 2A), whether the activity 38 impairs public confidence in the judiciary (Canon 2), whether the judge is allowing the 39 activity to take precedence over judicial duties (Canon 3A), and whether engaging in the 40 activity would cause the judge to be disqualified (Canon 4A(4)).

See Canons 4B 41 (Commentary), 4C(1), 4C(1) (Commentary), 4C(2), 4C(2) (Commentary), 4C(3)(a), 42

6 4C(3)(b) (Commentary), 4C(3)(d)(ii), 4C(3)(d) (Commentary), 4D(6)(d), 4D(6)(e), 5A 1 (Commentary), 5D, and 5D (Commentary). 2 3 “Member of the judge’s family” means a spouse, registered domestic partner, child, 4 grandchild, parent, grandparent, or other relative or person with whom the judge 5 maintains a close familial relationship.

See Canons 2B(3)(c), 2B (Commentary), 6 4C(3)(d)(i), 4D(1) (Commentary), 4D(2), 4D(5) (Commentary), 4E(1), and 4G 7 (Commentary). 8 9 “Member of the judge’s family residing in the judge’s household” means a spouse or 10 registered domestic partner and those persons who reside in the judge’s household and 11 who are relatives of the judge, including relatives by marriage or persons with whom th e 12 judge maintains a close familial relationship. See Canons 4D(5), 4D(5) (Commentary), 13 4D(6), 4D(6)(b) (Commentary), 4D(6)(

f) and 6D(2)(c). 14 15 “Nonpublic information” means information that, by law, is not available to the public. 16 Nonpublic information may include, but is not limited to, information that is sealed by 17 statute or court order, impounded, or communicated in camera, and information offered 18 in grand jury proceedings, presentencing reports, dependency cases, or psychiatric 19 reports. Nonpublic information also includes information from affidavits, jury results, or 20 court rulings before it becomes public information.

See Canons 3B(11) and 6D(8)(a). 21 22 “Pending proceeding” is a proceeding or matter that has commenced. A proceeding 23 continues to be pending through any period during which an appeal may be filed and any 24 appellate process until final disposition. The words “proceeding” and “matter” are used 25 interchangeably, and are intended to have the same meaning.

See Canons 2 and 2A 26 (Commentary), 2B(3)(a), 3B(7), 3B(9), 3B(9) (Commentary), 3E(5)(a), 4H 27 (Commentary), and 6D(6). “Impending proceeding” is defined above. 28 29 “Political organization” means a political party, political action committee, or other 30 group, the principal purpose of which is to further the election or appointment of 31 candidates to nonjudicial office. See Canon 5A. 32 33 “Registered domestic partner” means a person who has registered for domestic 34 partnership pursuant to state law or who is recognized as a domestic partner pursuant to 35 Family Code

section 299.2. See Canons 3E(5)(d), 3E(5)(e), 3E(5)(i), 4D(6)(d), 4D(6)(f), 36 4D(6)(j), 4H(2), 5A (Commentary), 6D(3)(a)(v), and 6D(3)(a)(vi). 37 38 “Require.” Any canon prescribing that a judge “require” certain conduct of others means 39 that a judge is to exercise reasonable direction and control over the conduct of those 40 persons subject to the judge's direction and control. See Canons 3B(3), 3B(4), 3B(6), 41 3B(8) (Commentary), 3B(9), 3C(3), 6D(1), 6D(2)(a), and 6D(6). 42 43

7 “Service organization” includes any organization commonly referred to as a “fraternal 1 organization.” See Canons 3E(5)(d), 4C(2) (Commentary), 4C(3)(b), 4C(3)(b) 2 (Commentary), 4C(3)(d) (Commentary), 4D(6)(j), and 6D(2)(b). 3 4 “Subordinate judicial officer.” A subordinate judicial officer is, for the purposes of this 5 code, a person appointed pursuant to

article VI,

section 22 of the California Constitution, 6 including, but not limited to, a commissioner, referee, and hearing officer. See Canons 7 3D(3), 4G (Commentary), and 6A. 8 9 “Temporary Judge” means an active or inactive member of the bar who, pursuant to 10

article VI,

section 21 of the California Constitution, serves or expects to serve as a judge 11 once, sporadically, or regularly on a part-time basis under a separate court appointment 12 for each period of service or for each case heard. See Canons 3E(5)(h), 4C(3)(d)(i), 13 4C(3)(d) (Commentary), 6A, and 6D. 14 15 “Third degree of relationship” includes the following persons: great-grandparent, 16 grandparent, parent, uncle, aunt, brother, sister, child, grandchild, great-grandchild, 17 nephew, and niece. See Canons 3E(5)(e), 3E(5)(i), and 6D(3)(a)(v). 18 19

8 CANON 1 1 2 A JUDGE SHALL UPHOLD THE INTEGRITY* AND 3 INDEPENDENCE* OF THE JUDICIARY 4 5 An independent, impartial,* and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our 6 society. A judge should participate in establishing, maintaining, and enforcing high 7 standards of conduct, and shall personally observe those standards so that the inte grity* 8 and independence* of the judiciary is preserved. The provisions of this code are to be 9 construed and applied to further that objective.

A judicial decision or administrative act 10 later determined to be incorrect legally is not itself a violation of this code. 11 12 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 1 13 Deference to the judgments and rulings of courts depends upon public confidence 14 in the integrity* and independence* of judges. The integrity* and independence* of 15 judges depend in turn upon their acting without fear or favor. Although judges should be 16 independent, they must comply with the law* and the provisions of this code.

Public 17 confidence in the impartiality* of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each 18 judge to this responsibility. Conversely, violations of this code diminish public 19 confidence in the judiciary and thereby do injury to the system of government under law. 20 The basic function of an independent, impartial,* and honorable judiciary is to 21 maintain the utmost integrity* in decisionmaking, and this code should be read and 22 interpreted with that function in mind. 23

9 CANON 2 1 2 A JUDGE SHALL AVOID IMPROPRIETY* AND THE 3 APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY* IN ALL OF THE JUDGE’S 4 ACTIVITIES 5 6 A. Promoting Public Confidence 7 8 A judge shall respect and comply with the law* and shall act at all times in a manner that 9 promotes public confidence in the integrity* and impartiality* of the judiciary.

A judge 10 shall not make statements, whether public or nonpublic, that commit the judge with 11 respect to cases, controversies, or issues that are likely to come before the courts or that 12 are inconsistent with the impartial* performance of the adjudicative duties of judicial 13 office. 14 15 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canons 2 and 2A 16 Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conduct 17 by judges. 18 A judge must avoid all impropriety* and appearance of impropriety.* A judge 19 must expect to be the subject of constant public scrutiny.

A judge must therefore accept 20 restrictions on the judge's conduct that might be viewed as burdensome by other 21 members of the community and should do so freely and willingly. 22 A judge must exercise caution when engaging in any type of electronic 23 communication, including communication by text or email, or when participating in 24 online social networking sites or otherwise posting material on the Internet, given the 25 accessibility, widespread transmission, and permanence of electronic communications 26 and material posted on the Internet.

The same canons that govern a judge’s ability to 27 socialize and communicate in person, on paper, or over the telephone apply to electronic 28 communications, including use of the Internet and social networking sites.

These canons 29 include, but are not limited to, Canons 2B(2) (lending the prestige of judicial office), 30 3B(7) (ex parte communications), 3B(9) (public comment about pending* or impending 31 proceedings*), 3E(2) (disclosure of information relevant to disqualification), and 4A 32 (conducting extrajudicial activities to avoid casting doubt on the judge’s capacity to act 33 impartially,* demeaning the judicial office, or frequent disqualification). 34 The prohibition against behaving with impropriety* or the appearance of 35 impropriety* applies to both the professional and personal conduct of a judge. 36 The test for the appearance of impropriety* is whether a person aware of the facts 37 might reasonably entertain a doubt that the judge would be able to act with integrity,* 38 impartiality,* and competence. 39 As to membership in organizations that practice invidious discrimination, see 40 Commentary under Canon 2C. 41 As to judges making statements that commit the judge with respect to cases, 42 controversies, or issues that are likely to come before the courts, see Canon 3B(9) and its 43

10 commentary concerning comments about a pending proceeding,* Canon 3E(3)(a) 1 concerning the disqualification of a judge who makes statements that commit the judge to 2 a particular result, and Canon 5B(1)(

a) concerning statements made during an election 3 campaign that commit the candidate to a particular result. In addition, Code of Civil 4 Procedure

section 170.2, subdivision (b), provides that, with certain exceptions, a judge 5 is not disqualified on the ground that the judge has, in any capacity, expressed a view on 6 a legal or factual issue presented in the proceeding before the judge. 7 8 B. Use of the Prestige of Judicial Office 9 10

(1) A judge shall not allow family, social, political, or other relationships to influence 11 the judge’s judicial conduct or judgment, nor shall a judge convey or permit others to 12 convey the impression that any individual is in a special position to influence the 13 judge. 14 15

(2) A judge shall not lend the prestige of judicial office or use the judicial title in any 16 manner, including any oral or written communication, to advance the pecuniary or 17 personal interests of the judge or others. This canon does not prohibit the following: 18 19 (

a) A judge may testify as a character witness, provided the judge does so only 20 when subpoenaed. 21 22 (

b) A judge may, without a subpoena, provide the Commission on Judicial 23 Performance with a written communication containing (

i) factual information 24 regarding a matter pending before the commission or (ii) information related to the 25 character of a judge who has a matter pending before the commission, provided 26 that any such factual or character information is based on personal knowledge.* 27 In commission proceedings, a judge shall provide information responsive to a 28 subpoena or when officially requested to do so by the commission. 29 30 (

c) A judge may provide factual information in State Bar disciplinary proceedings 31 and shall provide information responsive to a subpoena or when officially 32 requested to do so by the State Bar. 33 34 (

d) A judge may respond to judicial selection inquiries, provide recommendations 35 (including a general character reference relating to the evaluation of persons being 36 considered for a judgeship), and otherwise participate in the process of judicial 37 selection. 38 39 (

e) A judge may serve as a reference or provide a letter of recommendation only if 40 based on the judge’s personal knowledge* of the individual. These written 41 communications may include the judge’s title and may be written on stationery 42 that uses the judicial title. 43

(3) Except as permitted in subdivision (

c) or otherwise authorized by law* or these 1 canons: 2 3 (

a) A judge shall not advance the pecuniary or personal interests of the judge or 4 others by initiating communications with a sentencing judge or a representative of 5 a probation department about a proceeding pending* before the sentencing judge, 6 but may provide information in response to an official request. “Sentencing 7 judge” includes a judge who makes a disposition pursuant to Welfare and 8 Institutions Code

section 725. 9 10 (

b) A judge, other than the judge who presided over the trial of or sentenced the 11 person seeking parole, pardon, or commutation of sentence, shall not initiate 12 communications with the Board of Parole Hearings regarding parole or the Office 13 of the Governor regarding parole, pardon, or commutation of sentence, but may 14 provide these entities with information for the record in response to an official 15 request. 16 17 (

c) A judge may initiate communications concerning a member of the judge’s 18 family* with a representative of a probation department regarding sentencing, the 19 Board of Parole Hearings regarding parole, or the Office of the Governor 20 regarding parole, pardon, or commutation of sentence, provided the judge is not 21 identified as a judge in the communication. 22 23 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 2B 24 A strong judicial branch, based on the prestige that comes from effective and 25 ethical performance, is essential to a system of government in which the judiciary 26 functions independently of the executive and legislative branches.

A judge should 27 distinguish between proper and improper use of the prestige of office in all of his or her 28 activities. 29 As to those communications that are permitted under this canon, a judge must 30 keep in mind the general obligations to maintain high standards of conduct as set forth in 31 Canon 1, and to avoid any impropriety* or the appearance of impropriety* as set forth in 32 Canon 2.

A judge must also be mindful of Canon 2A, which requires a judge to act at all 33 times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity* and impartiality* of 34 the courts. 35 A judge must avoid lending the prestige of judicial office for the advancement of 36 the private interests of the judge or others.

For example, a judge must not use the 37 judicial position to gain advantage in a civil suit involving a member of the judge’s 38 family,* or use his or her position to gain deferential treatment when stopped by a police 39 officer for a traffic offense. 40 If a judge posts on social networking sites such as Facebook or crowdsourced 41 sites such as Yelp or Trip Advisor, the judge may not lend the prestige of judicial office to 42 advance the pecuniary or personal interests of the judge or others. For example, a judge 43

12 may not comment on, recommend, or criticize businesses, products, or services on such 1 sites if it is reasonably likely that the judge can be identified as a judge. 2 See canon 4C(3)(d)(iv) prohibiting the use of the prestige of judicial office for 3 fundraising or membership solicitation, but allowing a judge to be a speaker, guest of 4 honor, or recipient of an award for public or charitable service, provided the judge does 5 not personally solicit funds and complies with Canons 4A (1), (2), (3), and (4). 6 As to the use of a judge’s title to identify a judge’s role in the presentation and 7 creation of legal education programs and materials, see Commentary to Canon 4B.

In 8 contracts for publication of a judge’s writings, a judge should retain control over the 9 advertising, to the extent feasible, to avoid exploitation of the judge’s office. 10 This canon does not afford a judge a privilege against testifying in response to any 11 official summons. 12 See also Canons 3D(1) and 3D(2) concerning a judge’s obligation to take 13 appropriate corrective action regarding other judges who violate any provision of the 14 Code of Judicial Ethics and attorneys who violate any provision of the Rules of 15 Professional Conduct. 16 Except as set forth in Canon 2B(3)(a), this canon does not preclude consultations 17 among judges.

Additional limitations on such consultations among judges are set forth in 18 Canon 3B(7)(a). 19 20 C.

Membership in Organizations 21 22 A judge shall not hold membership in any organization that practices invidious 23 discrimination on the basis of race, sex, gender, gender identity,* gender expression,* 24 religion, national origin, ethnicity, or sexual orientation. 25 26 This canon does not apply to membership in a religious organization. 27 28 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 2C 29 Membership by a judge in an organization that practices invidious discrimination 30 on the basis of race, sex, gender, religion, national origin, ethnicity, or sexual orientation 31 gives rise to a perception that the judge’s impartiality* is impaired.

The code prohibits 32 such membership by judges to preserve the fairness, impartiality,* independence,* and 33 honor of the judiciary, to treat all parties equally under the law,* and to avoid 34 impropriety* and the appearance of impropriety.* 35 Previously, Canon 2C contained exceptions to this prohibition for membership in 36 religious organizations, membership in an official military organization of the United 37 States and, so long as membership did not violate Canon 4A, membership in a nonprofit 38 youth organization.

The exceptions for membership in an official military organization 39 of the United States and nonprofit youth organizations have been eliminated as 40 exceptions to the canon. The exception for membership in religious organizations has 41 been preserved. 42

13 Canon 2C refers to the current practices of the organization. Whether an 1 organization practices invidious discrimination is often a complex question to which 2 judges should be sensitive.

The answer cannot be determined from a mere examination 3 of an organization’s current membership rolls, but rather depends on how the 4 organization selects members and other relevant factors, such as whether the 5 organization is dedicated to the preservation of religious, ethnic, or cultural values of 6 legitimate common interest to its members, or whether it is in fact and effect an intimate, 7 purely private organization whose membership limitations could not be constitutionally 8 prohibited.

Absent such factors, an organization is generally said to discriminate 9 invidiously if it arbitrarily excludes from membership on the basis of race, religion, sex, 10 gender, gender identity,* gender expression,* national origin, ethnicity, or sexual 11 orientation persons who would otherwise be admitted to membership. 12 Although Canon 2C relates only to membership in organizations that invidiously 13 discriminate on the basis of race, sex, gender, gender identity,* gender expression,* 14 religion, national origin, ethnicity, or sexual orientation, a judge’s membership in an 15 organization that engages in any discriminatory membership practices prohibited by 16 law* also violates Canon 2 and Canon 2A and gives the appearance of impropriety.* In 17 addition, it would be a violation of Canon 2 and Canon 2A for a judge to arrange a 18 meeting at a club that the judge knows* practices such invidious discrimination or for the 19 judge to use such a club regularly.

Moreover, public manifestation by a judge of the 20 judge’s knowing* approval of invidious discrimination on any basis gives the appearance 21 of impropriety* under Canon 2 and diminishes public confidence in the integrity* and 22 impartiality* of the judiciary in violation of Canon 2A. 23 24

14 CANON 3 1 2 A JUDGE SHALL PERFORM THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL OFFICE 3 IMPARTIALLY,* COMPETENTLY, AND DILIGENTLY 4 5 A. Judicial Duties in General 6 7 All of the judicial duties prescribed by law* shall take precedence over all other activities 8 of every judge. In the performance of these duties, the following standards apply. 9 10 B. Adjudicative Responsibilities 11 12

(1) A judge shall hear and decide all matters assigned to the judge except those in 13 which he or she is disqualified. 14 15 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 3B(1) 16 Canon 3B(1) is based upon the affirmative obligation contained in Code of Civil 17 Procedure

section 170. 18 19

(2) A judge shall be faithful to the law* regardless of partisan interests, public clamor, 20 or fear of criticism, and shall maintain professional competence in the law.* 21 22 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 3B(2) 23 Competence in the performance of judicial duties requires the legal knowledge,* 24 skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary to perform a judge’s 25 responsibilities of judicial office. Canon 1 provides that an incorrect legal ruling is not 26 itself a violation of this code. 27 28

(3) A judge shall require* order and decorum in proceedings before the judge. 29 30

(4) A judge shall be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, 31 lawyers, and others with whom the judge deals in an official capacity, and shall 32 require* similar conduct of lawyers and of all staff and court personnel under the 33 judge’s direction and control. 34 35

(5) A judge shall perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice. A judge shall not, 36 in the performance of judicial duties, engage in speech, gestures, or other conduct that 37 would reasonably be perceived as (

a) bias, prejudice, or harassment, including but not 38 limited to bias, prejudice, or harassment based upon race, sex, gender, gender 39 identity,* gender expression,* religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, 40 sexual orientation, marital status, socioeconomic status, or political affiliation, or (b) 41 sexual harassment. 42

(6) A judge shall require* lawyers in proceedings before the judge to refrain from (a) 1 manifesting, by words or conduct, bias, prejudice, or harassment based upon race, sex, 2 gender, gender identity,* gender expression,* religion, national origin, ethnicity, 3 disability, age, sexual orientation, marital status, socioeconomic status, or political 4 affiliation, or (

b) sexual harassment against parties, witnesses, counsel, or others. 5 This canon does not preclude legitimate advocacy when race, sex, gender, gender 6 identity,* gender expression,* religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, 7 sexual orientation, marital status, socioeconomic status, political affiliation, or other 8 similar factors are issues in the proceeding. 9 10

(7) A judge shall accord to every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding, or 11 that person’s lawyer, the full right to be heard according to law.* Unless otherwise 12 authorized by law,* a judge shall not independently investigate facts in a proceeding 13 and shall consider only the evidence presented or facts that may be properly judicially 14 noticed. This prohibition extends to information available in all media, including 15 electronic.

A judge shall not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications, 16 that is, any communications to or from the judge outside the presence of the parties 17 concerning a pending* or impending* proceeding, and shall make reasonable efforts 18 to avoid such communications, except as follows: 19 20 (

a) Except as stated below, a judge may consult with other judges. A judge 21 presiding over a case shall not engage in discussions about that case with a judge 22 who has previously been disqualified from hearing that case; likewise, a judge 23 who knows* he or she is or would be disqualified from hearing a case shall not 24 discuss that matter with the judge assigned to the case.

A judge also shall not 25 engage in discussions with a judge who may participate in appellate review of the 26 matter, nor shall a judge who may participate in appellate review of a m atter 27 engage in discussions with the judge presiding over the case. 28 29 A judge may consult with court personnel or others authorized by law,* as long as 30 the communication relates to that person’s duty to aid the judge in carrying out the 31 judge’s adjudicative responsibilities. 32 33 In any discussion with judges or court personnel, a judge shall make reasonable 34 efforts to avoid receiving factual information that is not part of the record or an 35 evaluation of that factual information.

In such consultations, the judge shall not 36 abrogate the responsibility personally to decide the matter. 37 38 For purposes of Canon 3B(7)(a), “court personnel” includes bailiffs, court 39 reporters, court externs, research attorneys, courtroom clerks, and other employees 40 of the court, but does not include the lawyers in a proceeding before a judge, 41 persons who are appointed by the court to serve in some capacity in a proceeding, 42

16 or employees of other governmental entities, such as lawyers, social workers, or 1 representatives of the probation department. 2 3 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 3B(7)(a) 4 Regarding communications between a judge presiding over a matter and a judge 5 of a court with appellate jurisdiction over that matter, see Government Code

section 6 68070.5. 7 Though a judge may have ex parte discussions with appropriate court personnel, a 8 judge may do so only on matters that are within the proper performance of that person’s 9 duties. For example, a bailiff may inform the judge of a threat to the judge or to the 10 safety and security of the courtroom, but may not tell the judge ex parte that a defendant 11 was overheard making an incriminating statement during a court recess.

A clerk may 12 point out to the judge a technical defect in a proposed sentence, but may not suggest to 13 the judge that a defendant deserves a certain sentence. 14 A sentencing judge may not consult ex parte with a representative of the probation 15 department about a matter pending before the sentencing judge. 16 This canon prohibits a judge who is presiding over a case from discussing that 17 case with another judge who has already been disqualified from hearing that case. A 18 judge also must be careful not to talk to a judge whom the judge knows* would be 19 disqualified from hearing the matter. 20 21 (

b) A judge may initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications, where 22 circumstances require, for scheduling, administrative purposes, or emergencies 23 that do not deal with substantive matters provided: 24 25 (

i) the judge reasonably believes that no party will gain a procedural or tactical 26 advantage as a result of the ex parte communication, and 27 28 (ii) the judge makes provision promptly to notify all other parties of the 29 substance of the ex parte communication and allows an opportunity to respond. 30 31 (

c) A judge may initiate, permit, or consider any ex parte communication when 32 expressly authorized by law* to do so or when authorized to do so by stipulation 33 of the parties. 34 35 (

d) If a judge receives an unauthorized ex parte communication, the judge shall 36 make provision promptly to notify the parties of the substance of the 37 communication and provide the parties with an opportunity to respond. 38 39 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 3B(7) 40 An exception allowing a judge, under certain circumstances, to obtain the advice 41 of a disinterested expert on the law* has been eliminated from Canon 3B(7) because 42 consulting with legal experts outside the presence of the parties is inconsistent w ith the 43

17 core tenets of the adversarial system. Therefore, a judge shall not consult with legal 1 experts outside the presence of the parties. Evidence Code

section 730 provides for the 2 appointment of an expert if a judge determines that expert testimony is necessary. A 3 court may also invite the filing of amicus curiae briefs. 4 An exception allowing a judge to confer with the parties separately in an effort to 5 settle the matter before the judge has been moved from this canon to Canon 3B(12). 6 This canon does not prohibit court personnel from communicating scheduling 7 information or carrying out similar administrative functions. 8 A judge is statutorily authorized to investigate and consult witnesses informally in 9 small claims cases. Code of Civil Procedure

section 116.520, subdivision (c). 10 11

(8) A judge shall dispose of all judicial matters fairly, promptly, and efficiently. A 12 judge shall manage the courtroom in a manner that provides all litigants the 13 opportunity to have their matters fairly adjudicated in accordance with the law.* 14 15 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 3B(8) 16 The obligation of a judge to dispose of matters promptly and efficiently must not 17 take precedence over the judge’s obligation to dispose of the matters fairly and with 18 patience.

For example, when a litigant is self-represented, a judge has the discretion to 19 take reasonable steps, appropriate under the circumstances and consistent with the law* 20 and the canons, to enable the litigant to be heard.

A judge should monitor and supervise 21 cases so as to reduce or eliminate dilatory practices, avoidable delays, and unnecessary 22 costs. 23 Prompt disposition of the court’s business requires a judge to devote adequate 24 time to judicial duties, to be punctual in attending court and expeditious in determining 25 matters under submission, and to require* that court officials, litigants, and their lawyers 26 cooperate with the judge to those ends. 27 28

(9) A judge shall not make any public comment about a pending* or impending* 29 proceeding in any court, and shall not make any nonpublic comment that might 30 substantially interfere with a fair trial or hearing. The judge shall require* similar 31 abstention on the part of staff and court personnel subject to the judge’s direction and 32 control. This canon does not prohibit judges from making statements in the course of 33 their official duties or from explaining the procedures of the court, and does not apply 34 to proceedings in which the judge is a litigant in a personal capacity.

In connection 35 with a judicial election or recall campaign, this canon does not prohibit any judge 36 from making a public comment about a pending* proceeding, provided (

a) the 37 comment would not reasonably be expected to affect the outcome or impair the 38 fairness of the proceeding, and (

b) the comment is about the procedural, factual, or 39 legal basis of a decision about which a judge has been criticized during the election or 40 recall campaign. Other than cases in which the judge has personally participated, this 41 canon does not prohibit judges from discussing, in legal education programs and 42 materials, cases and issues pending in appellate courts. This educational exemption 43

18 does not apply to cases over which the judge has presided or to comments or 1 discussions that might interfere with a fair hearing of the case. 2 3 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 3B(9) 4 The requirement that judges abstain from public comment regarding a pending* 5 or impending* proceeding continues during any appellate process and until final 6 disposition. A judge shall make reasonable efforts to ascertain whether a case is 7 pending* or impending* before commenting on it.

This canon does not prohibit a judge 8 from commenting on proceedings in which the judge is a litigant in a personal capacity, 9 but in cases such as a writ of mandamus where the judge is a litigant in an official 10 capacity, the judge must not comment publicly. 11 “Making statements in the course of their official duties” and “explaining the 12 procedures of the court” include providing an official transcript or partial official 13 transcript of a court proceeding open to the public and explaining the rules of court and 14 procedures related to a decision rendered by a judge. 15 The provision allowing a judge to make a public comment about a pending* 16 decision that is the subject of criticism during an election campaign applies to all judicial 17 elections, including recall elections.

Depending on the circumstances, the judge should 18 consider whether it may be preferable for a third party, rather than the judge, to respond 19 or issue statements in connection with allegations concerning the decision. For purposes 20 of this provision, a recall campaign begins when a judge is served with a notice of 21 intention to circulate a recall petition (see Elec. Code, § 11006), and a judicial election 22 campaign begins when a judge or candidate for judicial office* files a declaration of 23 intention of candidacy for judicial office (see Elec.

Code, § 8023). 24 Although this canon does not prohibit a judge from commenting on cases that are 25 not pending* or impending* in any court, a judge must be cognizant of the general 26 prohibition in Canon 2 against conduct involving impropriety* or the appearance of 27 impropriety.* A judge should also be aware of the mandate in Canon 2A that a judge 28 must act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity* and 29 impartiality* of the judiciary.

In addition, when commenting on a case pursuant to this 30 canon, a judge must maintain the high standards of conduct, as set forth in Canon 1. 31 Although a judge is permitted to make nonpublic comments about pending* or 32 impending* cases that will not substantially interfere with a fair trial or hearing, the 33 judge should be cautious when making any such comments. There is always a risk that a 34 comment can be misheard, misinterpreted, or repeated.

A judge making such a comment 35 must be mindful of the judge’s obligation under Canon 2A to act at all times in a manner 36 that promotes public confidence in the integrity* and impartiality* of the judiciary. 37 When a judge makes a nonpublic comment about a case pending* before that judge, the 38 judge must keep an open mind and not form an opinion prematurely or create the 39 appearance of having formed an opinion prematurely. 40 41

(10) A judge shall not commend or criticize jurors for their verdict other than in a 1 court order or opinion in a proceeding, but may express appreciation to jurors for their 2 service to the judicial system and the community. 3 4 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 3B(10) 5 Commending or criticizing jurors for their verdict may imply a judicial 6 expectation in future cases and may impair a juror’s ability to be fair and impartial* in a 7 subsequent case. 8 9

(11) A judge shall not disclose or use, for any purpose unrelated to judicial duties, 10 nonpublic information* acquired in a judicial capacity. 11 12

(12) A judge may participate in settlement conferences or in other efforts to resolve 13 matters in dispute, including matters pending before the judge. A judge may, with the 14 express consent of the parties or their lawyers, confer separately with the parties 15 and/or their lawyers during such resolution efforts.

At all times during such 16 resolution efforts, a judge shall remain impartial* and shall not engage in cond uct that 17 may reasonably be perceived as coercive. 18 19 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 3B(12) 20 While the judge plays an important role in overseeing efforts to resolve disputes, 21 including conducting settlement discussions, a judge should be careful that efforts to 22 resolve disputes do not undermine any party’s right to be heard according to law.* 23 The judge should keep in mind the effect that the judge’s participation in dispute 24 resolution efforts may have on the judge’s impartiality* or the appearance of 25 impartiality* if the case remains with the judge for trial after resolution efforts are 26 unsuccessful.

Accordingly, a judge may wish to consider whether: (1) the parties or their 27 counsel have requested or objected to the participation by the trial judge in such 28 discussions; (2) the parties and their counsel are relatively sophisticated in legal matt ers 29 or the particular legal issues involved in the case; (3) a party is unrepresented; (4) the 30 case will be tried by the judge or a jury; (5) the parties will participate with their counsel 31 in settlement discussions and, if so, the effect of personal contact between the judge and 32 parties; and (6) it is appropriate during the settlement conference for the judge to express 33 an opinion on the merits or worth of the case or express an opinion on the legal issues 34 that the judge may later have to rule upon. 35 If a judge assigned to preside over a trial believes participation in resolution 36 efforts could influence the judge’s decisionmaking during trial, the judge may decline to 37 engage in such efforts. 38 Where dispute resolution efforts of any type are unsuccessful, the judge should 39 consider whether, due to events that occurred during the resolution efforts, the judge may 40 be disqualified under the law* from presiding over the trial.

See, e.g., Code of Civil 41 Procedure

section 170.1, subdivision (a)(6)(A). 42 43

20 C. Administrative Responsibilities 1 2

(1) A judge shall diligently discharge the judge’s administrative responsibilities 3 impartially,* on the basis of merit, without bias or prejudice, free of conflict of 4 interest, and in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity* of the 5 judiciary. A judge shall not, in the performance of administrative duties, engage in 6 speech, gestures, or other conduct that would reasonably be perceived as (

a) bias, 7 prejudice, or harassment, including but not limited to bias, prejudice, or harassment 8 based upon race, sex, gender, gender identity,* gender expression,* religion, national 9 origin, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, marital status, socioeconomic 10 status, or political affiliation, or (

b) sexual harassment. 11 12 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 3C(1) 13 In considering what constitutes a conflict of interest under this canon, a judge 14 should be informed by Code of Civil Procedure

section 170.1, subdivision (a)(6). 15 16

(2) A judge shall maintain professional competence in judicial administration, and 17 shall cooperate with other judges and court officials in the administration of court 18 business. 19 20

(3) A judge shall require* staff and court personnel under the judge’s direction and 21 control to observe appropriate standards of conduct and to refrain from (a) 22 manifesting bias, prejudice, or harassment based upon race, sex, gender, gender 23 identity,* gender expression,* religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, 24 sexual orientation, marital status, socioeconomic status, or political affiliation , or (b) 25 sexual harassment in the performance of their official duties. 26 27

(4) A judge with supervisory authority for the judicial performance of other judges 28 shall take reasonable measures to ensure the prompt disposition of matters before 29 them and the proper performance of their other judicial responsibilities. 30 31

(5) A judge shall not make unnecessary court appointments. A judge shall exercise 32 the power of appointment impartially,* on the basis of merit, without bias or 33 prejudice, free of conflict of interest, and in a manner that promotes public confidence 34 in the integrity* of the judiciary. A judge shall avoid nepotism and favoritism.

A 35 judge shall not approve compensation of appointees above the reasonable value of 36 services rendered. 37 38 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 3C(5) 39 Appointees of a judge include assigned counsel and officials such as referees, 40 commissioners, special masters, receivers, and guardians. Consent by the parties to an 41 appointment or an award of compensation does not relieve the judge of the obligation 42 prescribed by Canon 3C(5). 43

21 D. Disciplinary Responsibilities 1 2

(1) Whenever a judge has reliable information that another judge has violated any 3 provision of the Code of Judicial Ethics, that judge shall take appropriate corrective 4 action, which may include reporting the violation to the appropriate authority. (See 5 Commentary to Canon 3D(2).) 6 7

(2) Whenever a judge has personal knowledge,* or concludes in a judicial decision, 8 that a lawyer has committed misconduct or has violated any provision of the Rules of 9 Professional Conduct, the judge shall take appropriate corrective action, which may 10 include reporting the violation to the appropriate authority. 11 12 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canons 3D(1) and 3D(2) 13 Appropriate corrective action could include direct communication with the judge 14 or lawyer who has committed the violation, writing about the misconduct in a judicial 15 decision, or other direct action, such as a confidential referral to a judicial or lawyer 16 assistance program, or a report of the violation to the presiding judge, appropriate 17 authority, or other agency or body.

Judges should note that in addition to the action 18 required by Canon 3D(2), California law imposes additional mandatory reporting 19 requirements to the State Bar on judges regarding lawyer misconduct. See Business and 20 Professions Code sections 6086.7 and 6086.8, subdivision (a), and California Rules of 21 Court, rules 10.609 and 10.1017. 22 “Appropriate authority” means the authority with responsibility for initiation of 23 the disciplinary process with respect to a violation to be reported. 24 25

(3) A judge shall promptly report in writing to the Commission on Judicial 26 Performance when he or she is charged in court by misdemeanor citation, 27 prosecutorial complaint, information, or indictment with any crime in the United 28 States as specified below.

Crimes that must be reported are: (1) all crimes, other than 29 those that would be considered misdemeanors not involving moral turpitude or 30 infractions under California law; and (2) all misdemeanors involving violence 31 (including assaults), the use or possession of controlled substances, the misuse of 32 prescriptions, or the personal use or furnishing of alcohol.

A judge also shall 33 promptly report in writing upon conviction of such crimes. 34 35 If the judge is a retired judge serving in the Temporary Assigned Judges Program, he 36 or she shall promptly report such information in writing to the Chief Justice rather 37 than to the Commission on Judicial Performance. If the judge is a subordinate 38 judicial officer,* he or she shall promptly report such information in writing to both 39 the presiding judge of the court in which the subordinate judicial officer* sits and the 40 Commission on Judicial Performance. 41 42

(4) A judge shall cooperate with judicial and lawyer disciplinary agencies. 43

22 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canons 3D(3) and 3D(4) 1 See Government Code

section 68725, which requires judges to cooperate with and 2 give reasonable assistance and information to the Commission on Judicial Performance, 3 and rule 104 of the Rules of the Commission on Judicial Performance, which requ ires a 4 respondent judge to cooperate with the commission in all proceedings in accordance with 5

section 68725. 6 7

(5) A judge shall not retaliate, directly or indirectly, against a person known* or 8 suspected to have assisted or cooperated with an investigation of a judge or a lawyer. 9 10 E. Disqualification and Disclosure 11 12

(1) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in any proceeding in which 13 disqualification is required by law.* 14 15 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 3E(1) 16 The term “proceeding” as used in this canon encompasses prefiling judicial 17 determinations. Thus, if a judge has a disqualifying interest in a matter, the judge is 18 disqualified from taking any action in the matter, even if it predates the actual filing of a 19 case, such as making a probable cause determination, signing a search or arrest 20 warrant, setting bail, or ordering an own recognizance release.

Interpreting 21 “proceeding” to include prefiling judicial determinations effectuates the intent of the 22 canon because it assures the parties and the public of the integrity* and fairness of the 23 judicial process. 24 25

(2) In all trial court proceedings, a judge shall disclose on the record as follows: 26 27 (

a) Information relevant to disqualification 28 29 A judge shall disclose information that is reasonably relevant to the question of 30 disqualification under Code of Civil Procedure

section 170.1, even if the judge 31 believes there is no actual basis for disqualification. 32 33 (

b) Campaign contributions in trial court elections 34 35 (

i) Information required to be disclosed 36 37 In any matter before a judge who is or was a candidate for judicial office* in a 38 trial court election, the judge shall disclose any contribution or loan of $100 or 39 more from a party, individual lawyer, or law office or firm in that matter as 40 required by this canon, even if the amount of the contribution or loan would 41 not require disqualification. Such disclosure shall consist of the name of the 42

23 contributor or lender, the amount of each contribution or loan, the cumulative 1 amount of the contributor’s contributions or lender’s loans, and the date of 2 each contribution or loan. The judge shall make reasonable efforts to obtain 3 current information regarding contributions or loans received by his or her 4 campaign and shall disclose the required information on the record. 5 6 (ii) Manner of disclosure 7 8 The judge shall ensure that the required information is conveyed on the record 9 to the parties and lawyers appearing in the matter before the judge.

The judge 10 has discretion to select the manner of disclosure, but the manner used shall 11 avoid the appearance that the judge is soliciting campaign contributions. 12 13 (iii) Timing of disclosure 14 15 Disclosure shall be made at the earliest reasonable opportunity after receiving 16 each contribution or loan.

The duty commences no later than one week after 17 receipt of the first contribution or loan, and continues for a period of two years 18 after the candidate takes the oath of office, or two years from the date of the 19 contribution or loan, whichever event is later. 20 21 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 3E(2)(b) 22 Code of Civil Procedure

section 170.1, subdivision (a)(9)(

C) requires a judge to 23 “disclose any contribution from a party or lawyer in a matter that is before the court that 24 is required to be reported under subdivision (

f) of

Section 84211 of the Government 25 Code, even if the amount would not require disqualification under this paragraph.” This 26 statute further provides that the “manner of disclosure shall be the same as that provided 27 in Canon 3E of the Code of Judicial Ethics.” Canon 3E(2)(

b) sets forth the information 28 the judge must disclose, the manner for making such disclosure, and the timing thereof. 29 “Contribution” includes monetary and in-kind contributions. See Cal. Code 30 Regs., tit. 2, § 18215, subd. (b)(3). See generally Government Code

section 84211, 31 subdivision (f). 32 Disclosure of campaign contributions is intended to provide parties and lawyers 33 appearing before a judge during and after a judicial campaign with easy access to 34 information about campaign contributions that may not require disqualification but could 35 be relevant to the question of disqualification of the judge. The judge is responsible for 36 ensuring that the disclosure is conveyed to the parties and lawyers appearing in the 37 matter. The canon provides that the judge has discretion to select the manner of making 38 the disclosure.

The appropriate manner of disclosure will depend on whether all of the 39 parties and lawyers are present in court, whether it is more efficient or practicable given 40 the court’s calendar to make a written disclosure, and other relevant circumstances that 41 may affect the ability of the parties and lawyers to access the required information. The 42

24 following alternatives for disclosure are non-exclusive. If all parties are present in court, 1 the judge may conclude that the most effective and efficient manner of providing 2 disclosure is to state orally the required information on the record in open court.

In the 3 alternative, again if all parties are present in court, a judge may determine that it is more 4 appropriate to state orally on the record in open court that parties and lawyers may 5 obtain the required information at an easily accessible location in the courthouse, and 6 provide an opportunity for the parties and lawyers to review the available information. 7 Another alternative, particularly if all or some parties are not present in court, is that the 8 judge may disclose the campaign contribution in a written minute order or in the official 9 court minutes and notify the parties and the lawyers of the written disclosure.

See 10 California Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions, CJEO Formal 11 Opinion No. 2013-002, pp. 7-8. If a party appearing in a matter before the judge is 12 represented by a lawyer, it is sufficient to make the disclosure to the lawyer. 13 In addition to the disclosure obligations set forth in Canon 3E(2)(b), a judge must, 14 pursuant to Canon 3E(2)(a), disclose on the record any other information that may be 15 relevant to the question of disqualification.

As examples, such an obligation may arise as 16 a result of contributions or loans of which the judge is aware made by a party, lawyer, or 17 law office or firm appearing before the judge to a third party in support of the judge or in 18 opposition to the judge’s opponent; a party, lawyer, or law office or firm’s relationship to 19 the judge or role in the campaign; or the aggregate contributions or loans from lawyers 20 in one law office or firm. 21 Canon 3E(2)(

b) does not eliminate the obligation of the judge to recuse himself or 22 herself where the nature of the contribution or loan, the extent of the contributor’s or 23 lender’s involvement in the judicial campaign, the relationship of the contributor or 24 lender, or other circumstance requires recusal under Code of Civil Procedure

section 25 170.1, and particularly

section 170.1, subdivision (a)(6)(A). 26 27

(3) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in accordance with the following: 28 29 (

a) Statements that commit the judge to a particular result 30 31 A judge is disqualified if the judge, while a judge or candidate for judicial office,* 32 made a statement, other than in a court proceeding, judicial decision, or opinion, 33 that a person aware of the facts might reasonably believe commits the judge to 34 reach a particular result or rule in a particular way in a proceeding. 35 36 (

b) Bond ownership 37 38 Ownership of a corporate bond issued by a party to a proceeding and having a fair 39 market value exceeding $1,500 is disqualifying. Ownership of a government bond 40 issued by a party to a proceeding is disqualifying only if the outcome of the 41 proceeding could substantially affect the value of the judge’s bond. Ownership in 42

25 a mutual or common investment fund that holds bonds is not a disqualifying 1 financial interest. 2 3 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 3E(3)(b) 4 The distinction between corporate and government bonds is consistent with the 5 Political Reform Act (see Gov. Code, § 82034), which requires disclosure of corporate 6 bonds, but not government bonds. Canon 3E(3) is intended to assist judges in complying 7 with Code of Civil Procedure

section 170.1, subdivision (a)(3) and Canon 3E(5)(d). 8 9

(4) An appellate justice shall disqualify himself or herself in any proceeding if for any 10 reason: 11 12 (

a) the justice believes his or her recusal would further the interests of justice; or 13 14 (

b) the justice substantially doubts his or her capacity to be impartial;* or 15 16 (

c) the circumstances are such that a reasonable person aware of the facts would 17 doubt the justice’s ability to be impartial.* 18 19

(5) Disqualification of an appellate justice is also required in the following instances: 20 21 (

a) The appellate justice has served as a lawyer in the pending* proceeding, or has 22 served as a lawyer in any other proceeding involving any of the same parties if 23 that other proceeding related to the same contested issues of fact and law as the 24 present proceeding, or has given advice to any party in the present proceeding 25 upon any issue involved in the proceeding. 26 27 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 3E(5)(a) 28 Canon 3E(5)(

a) is consistent with Code of Civil Procedure

section 170.1, 29 subdivision (a)(2), which addresses disqualification of trial court judges based on prior 30 representation of a party in the proceeding. 31 32 (

b) Within the last two years, (

i) a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director or 33 trustee thereof, either was a client of the justice when the justice was engaged in 34 the private practice of law or was a client of a lawyer with whom the justice was 35 associated in the private practice of law; or (ii) a lawyer in the proceeding was 36 associated with the justice in the private practice of law. 37 38 (

c) The appellate justice represented a public officer or entity and personally 39 advised or in any way represented that officer or entity concerning the factual or 40 legal issues in the present proceeding in which the public officer or entity now 41 appears. 42 43

26 (

d) The appellate justice, his or her spouse or registered domestic partner,* or a 1 minor child residing in the household, has a financial interest or is either a 2 fiduciary* who has a financial interest in the proceeding, or is a director, advisor, 3 or other active participant in the affairs of a party.

A financial interest is defined 4 as ownership of more than a 1 percent legal or equitable interest in a party, or a 5 legal or equitable interest in a party of a fair market value exceeding $1,500. 6 Ownership in a mutual or common investment fund that holds securities does not 7 itself constitute a financial interest; holding office in an educational, religious, 8 charitable, service,* or civic organization does not confer a financial interest in the 9 organization’s securities; and a proprietary interest of a policyholder in a mutual 10 insurance company or mutual savings association or similar interest is not a 11 financial interest unless the outcome of the proceeding could substantially affect 12 the value of the interest.

A justice shall make reasonable efforts to keep informed 13 about his or her personal and fiduciary* interests and those of his or her spouse or 14 registered domestic partner* and of minor children living in the household. 15 16 (e)(

i) The justice or his or her spouse or registered domestic partner,* or a person 17 within the third degree of relationship* to either of them, or the spouse or 18 registered domestic partner* thereof, is a party or an officer, director, or trustee 19 of a party to the proceeding, or 20 21 (ii) a lawyer or spouse or registered domestic partner* of a lawyer in the 22 proceeding is the spouse, registered domestic partner,* former spouse, former 23 registered domestic partner,* child, sibling, or parent of the justice or of the 24 justice’s spouse or registered domestic partner,* or such a person is associated 25 in the private practice of law with a lawyer in the proceeding. 26 27 (

f) The justice 28 29 (

i) served as the judge before whom the proceeding was tried or heard in 30 the lower court, 31 32 (ii) has personal knowledge* of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the 33 proceeding, or 34 35 (iii) has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or a party’s lawyer. 36 37 (

g) A temporary or permanent physical impairment renders the justice unable 38 properly to perceive the evidence or conduct the proceedings. 39 40 (

h) The justice has a current arrangement concerning prospective employment or 41 other compensated service as a dispute resolution neutral or is participating in, or, 42 within the last two years has participated in, discussions regarding prospective 43

27 employment or service as a dispute resolution neutral, or has been engaged in such 1 employment or service, and any of the following applies: 2 3 (

i) The arrangement is, or the prior employment or discussion was, with a 4 party to the proceeding; 5 6 (ii) The matter before the justice includes issues relating to the enforcement of 7 either an agreement to submit a dispute to an alternative dispute resolution 8 process or an award or other final decision by a dispute resolution neutral; 9 10 (iii) The justice directs the parties to participate in an alternative dispute 11 resolution process in which the dispute resolution neutral will be an individual 12 or entity with whom the justice has the arrangement, has previously been 13 employed or served, or is discussing or has discussed the employment or 14 service; or 15 16 (iv) The justice will select a dispute resolution neutral or entity to conduct an 17 alternative dispute resolution process in the matter before the justice, and 18 among those available for selection is an individual or entity with whom the 19 justice has the arrangement, with whom the justice has previously been 20 employed or served, or with whom the justice is discussing or has discussed 21 the employment or service. 22 23 For purposes of Canon 3E(5)(h), “participating in discussions” or “has participated 24 in discussions” means that the justice (

i) solicited or otherwise indicated an 25 interest in accepting or negotiating possible employment or service as an 26 alternative dispute resolution neutral, or (ii) responded to an unsolicited statement 27 regarding, or an offer of, such employment or service by expressing an interest in 28 that employment or service, making any inquiry regarding the employment or 29 service, or encouraging the person making the statement or offer to provide 30 additional information about that possible employment or service.

If a justice’s 31 response to an unsolicited statement regarding a question about, or offer of, 32 prospective employment or other compensated service as a dispute resolution 33 neutral is limited to responding negatively, declining the offer, or declining to 34 discuss such employment or service, that response does not constitute participating 35 in discussions. 36 37 For purposes of Canon 3E(5)(h), “party” includes the parent, subsidiary, or other 38 legal affiliate of any entity that is a party and is involved in the transaction, 39 contract, or facts that gave rise to the issues subject to the proceeding. 40 41 For purposes of Canon 3E(5)(h), “dispute resolution neutral” means an arbitrator, 42 a mediator, a temporary judge* appointed under

article VI,

section 21 of the 43

28 California Constitution, a referee appointed under Code of Civil Procedure

section 1 638 or 639, a special master, a neutral evaluator, a settlement officer, or a 2 settlement facilitator. 3 4 (

i) The justice’s spouse or registered domestic partner* or a person within the third 5 degree of relationship* to the justice or his or her spouse or registered domestic 6 partner,* or the person’s spouse or registered domestic partner,* was a witness in 7 the proceeding. 8 9 (

j) The justice has received a campaign contribution of $5,000 or more from a 10 party or lawyer in a matter that is before the court, and either of the following 11 applies: 12 13 (

i) The contribution was received in support of the justice’s last election, if the 14 last election was within the last six years; or 15 16 (ii) The contribution was received in anticipation of an upcoming election. 17 18 Notwithstanding Canon 3E(5)(j), a justice shall disqualify himself or herself based on 19 a contribution of a lesser amount if required by Canon 3E(4). 20 21 The disqualification required under Canon 3E(5)(

j) may be waived if all parties that 22 did not make the contribution agree to waive the disqualification. 23 24 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 3E 25 Canon 3E(1) sets forth the general duty to disqualify applicable to a judge of any 26 court.

Sources for determining when recusal or disqualification is appropriate may 27 include the applicable provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, other provisions of the 28 Code of Judicial Ethics, the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, the American Bar 29 Association’s Model Code of Judicial Conduct, and related case law. 30 The decision whether to disclose information under Canon 3E(2) is a decision 31 based on the facts of the case before the judge. A judge is required to disclose only 32 information that is related to the grounds for disqualification set forth in Code of Civil 33 Procedure

section 170.1. 34 Canon 3E(4) sets forth the general standards for recusal of an appellate justice. 35 The term “appellate justice” includes justices of both the Courts of Appeal and the 36 Supreme Court. Generally, the provisions concerning disqualification of an appellate 37 justice are intended to assist justices in determining whether recusal is appropriate and 38 to inform the public why recusal may occur. 39 The rule of necessity may override the rule of disqualification.

For example, a 40 judge might be required to participate in judicial review of a judicial salary statute, or 41 might be the only judge available in a matter requiring judicial action, such as a hearing 42 on probable cause or a temporary restraining order. In the latter case, the judge must 43

29 promptly disclose on the record the basis for possible disqualification and use reasonable 1 efforts to transfer the matter to another judge as soon as practicable. 2 In some instances, membership in certain organizations may have the potential to 3 give an appearance of partiality, although membership in the organization generally may 4 not be barred by Canon 2C, Canon 4, or any other specific canon. A judge holding 5 membership in an organization should disqualify himself or herself whenever doing so 6 would be appropriate in accordance with Canon 3E(1), 3E(4), or 3E(5) or statutory 7 requirements.

In addition, in some circumstances, the parties or their lawyers may 8 consider a judge’s membership in an organization relevant to the question of 9 disqualification, even if the judge believes there is no actual basis for disqualification. In 10 accordance with this canon, a judge should disclose to the parties his or her membership 11 in an organization, in any proceeding in which that information is reasonably relevant to 12 the question of disqualification under Code of Civil Procedure

section 170.1, even if the 13 judge concludes there is no actual basis for disqualification. 14 15

(6) It shall not be grounds for disqualification that the justice: 16 17 (

a) Is or is not a member of a racial, ethnic, religious, sexual, or similar group and 18 the proceeding involves the rights of such a group; 19 20 (

b) Has in any capacity expressed a view on a legal or factual issue presented in 21 the proceeding, except as provided in Canon 3E(5)(a), (b), or (c); 22 23 (

c) Has as a lawyer or public official participated in the drafting of laws * or in the 24 effort to pass or defeat laws,* the meaning, effect, or application of which is in 25 issue in the proceeding unless the judge believes that his or her prior involvement 26 was so well known* as to raise a reasonable doubt in the public mind as to his or 27 her capacity to be impartial.* 28 29 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 3E(6) 30 Canon 3E(6) is substantively the same as Code of Civil Procedure

section 170.2, 31 which pertains to trial court judges. 32 33

30 CANON 4 1 2 A JUDGE SHALL SO CONDUCT THE JUDGE’S QUASI-JUDICIAL AND 3 EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITIES AS TO MINIMIZE THE RISK OF 4 CONFLICT WITH JUDICIAL OBLIGATIONS 5 6 A.

Extrajudicial Activities in General 7 8 A judge shall conduct all of the judge’s extrajudicial activities so that they do not 9 10 (1) cast reasonable doubt on the judge’s capacity to act impartially,* 11 12 (2) demean the judicial office, 13 14 (3) interfere with the proper performance of judicial duties, or 15 16 (4) lead to frequent disqualification of the judge. 17 18 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4A 19 Complete separation of a judge from extrajudicial activities is neither possible nor 20 wise; a judge should not become isolated from the community in which he or she lives. 21 Expressions of bias or prejudice by a judge, even outside the judge’s judicial activities, 22 may cast reasonable doubt on the judge’s capacity to act impartially* as a judge. 23 Expressions that may do so include inappropriate use of humor or the use of demeaning 24 remarks.

See Canon 2C and accompanying Commentary. 25 Because a judge’s judicial duties take precedence over all other activities (see 26 Canon 3A), a judge must avoid extrajudicial activities that might reasonably result in the 27 judge being disqualified. 28 29 B.

Quasi-Judicial and Avocational Activities 30 31 A judge may speak, write, lecture, teach, and participate in activities concerning legal and 32 nonlegal subject matters, subject to the requirements of this code. 33 34 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4B 35 As a judicial officer and person specially learned in the law,* a judge is in a 36 unique position to contribute to the improvement of the law, the legal system, and the 37 administration of justice,* including revision of substantive and procedural law* and 38 improvement of criminal and juvenile justice.

To the extent that time permits, a judge 39 may do so, either independently or through a bar or judicial association or other group 40 dedicated to the improvement of the law.* It may be necessary to promote legal 41 education programs and materials by identifying authors and speakers by judicial title. 42

31 This is permissible, provided such use of the judicial title does not contravene Canons 2A 1 and 2B. 2 Judges are not precluded by their office from engaging in other social, community, 3 and intellectual endeavors so long as they do not interfere with the obligations under 4 Canons 2C and 4A. 5 6 C. Governmental, Civic, or Charitable Activities 7 8

(1) A judge shall not appear at a public hearing or officially consult with an execut ive 9 or legislative body or public official except on matters concerning the law, the legal 10 system, or the administration of justice,* or in matters involving the judge’s private 11 economic or personal interests. 12 13 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4C(1) 14 When deciding whether to appear at a public hearing or to consult with an 15 executive or legislative body or public official on matters concerning the law, the legal 16 system, or the administration of justice,* a judge should consider if that conduct would 17 violate any other provisions of this code.

For a list of factors to consider, see the 18 explanation of “law, the legal system, or the administration of justice” in the 19 Terminology section. See also Canon 2B regarding the obligation to avoid improper 20 influence. 21 22

(2) A judge shall not accept appointment to a governmental committee or commission 23 or other governmental position that is concerned with issues of fact or policy on 24 matters other than the improvement of the law, the legal system, or the administration 25 of justice.* A judge may, however, serve in the military reserve or represent a 26 national, state, or local government on ceremonial occasions or in connection with 27 historical, educational, or cultural activities. 28 29 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4C(2) 30 Canon 4C(2) prohibits a judge from accepting any governmental position except 31 one relating to the law, legal system, or administration of justice* as authorized by 32 Canon 4C(3).

The appropriateness of accepting extrajudicial assignments must be 33 assessed in light of the demands on judicial resources and the need to protect the courts 34 from involvement in extrajudicial matters that may prove to be controversial. Judges 35 shall not accept governmental appointments that are likely to interfere with the 36 effectiveness and independence* of the judiciary, or that constitute a public office within 37 the meaning of

article VI,

section 17 of the California Constitution. 38 Canon 4C(2) does not govern a judge’s service in a nongovernmental position. 39 See Canon 4C(3) permitting service by a judge with organizations devoted to the 40 improvement of the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice* and with 41 educational, religious, charitable, service,* or civic organizations not conducted for 42 profit. For example, service on the board of a public educational institution, other than a 43

32 law school, would be prohibited under Canon 4C(2), but service on the board of a public 1 law school or any private educational institution would generally be permitted under 2 Canon 4C(3). 3 4

(3) Subject to the following limitations and the other requirements of this code, 5 6 (

a) a judge may serve as an officer, director, trustee, or nonlegal advisor of an 7 organization or governmental agency devoted to the improvement of the law, the 8 legal system, or the administration of justice* provided that such position does not 9 constitute a public office within the meaning of

article VI,

section 17 of the 10 California Constitution; 11 12 (

b) a judge may serve as an officer, director, trustee, or nonlegal advisor of an 13 educational, religious, charitable, service,* or civic organization not conducted for 14 profit; 15 16 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4C(3) 17 Canon 4C(3) does not apply to a judge’s service in a governmental position 18 unconnected with the improvement of the law, the legal system, or the administration of 19 justice.* See Canon 4C(2). 20 Canon 4C(3) uses the phrase, “Subject to the following limitations and the other 21 requirements of this code.” As an example of the meaning of the phrase, a judge 22 permitted by Canon 4C(3) to serve on the board of a service organization* may be 23 prohibited from such service by Canon 2C or 4A if the institution practices invidious 24 discrimination or if service on the board otherwise casts reasonable doubt on the judge's 25 capacity to act impartially* as a judge. 26 Service by a judge on behalf of a civic or charitable organization may be governed 27 by other provisions of Canon 4 in addition to Canon 4C.

For example, a judge is 28 prohibited by Canon 4G from serving as a legal advisor to a civic or charitable 29 organization. 30 Service on the board of a homeowners association or a neighborhood protective 31 group is proper if it is related to the protection of the judge’s own economic interests. 32 See Canons 4D(2) and 4D(4). See Canon 2B regarding the obligation to avoid improper 33 use of the prestige of a judge’s office. 34 35 (

c) a judge shall not serve as an officer, director, trustee, or nonlegal advisor if it is 36 likely that the organization 37 38 (

i) will be engaged in judicial proceedings that would ordinarily come before 39 the judge, or 40 41

33 (ii) will be engaged frequently in adversary proceedings in the court of which 1 the judge is a member or in any court subject to the appellate jurisdiction of 2 the court of which the judge is a member. 3 4 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4C(3)(c) 5 The changing nature of some organizations and of their relationship to the law* 6 makes it necessary for the judge regularly to reexamine the activities of each 7 organization with which the judge is affiliated to determine if it is proper for the judge to 8 continue the affiliation.

Some organizations regularly engage in litigation to achieve 9 their goals or fulfill their purposes. Judges should avoid a leadership role in such 10 organizations as it could compromise the appearance of impartiality.* 11 12 (

d) a judge as an officer, director, trustee, nonlegal advisor, or as a member or 13 otherwise 14 15 (

i) may assist such an organization in planning fundraising and may 16 participate in the management and investment of the organization's funds. 17 However, a judge shall not personally participate in the solicitation of funds or 18 other fundraising activities, except that a judge may privately solicit funds for 19 such an organization from members of the judge’s family* or from other 20 judges (excluding court commissioners, referees, court-appointed arbitrators, 21 hearing officers, temporary judges,* and retired judges who serve in the 22 Temporary Assigned Judges Program, practice law, or provide alternative 23 dispute resolution services); 24 25 (ii) may make recommendations to public and private fund-granting 26 organizations on projects and programs concerning the law, the legal system, 27 or the administration of justice;* 28 29 (iii) shall not personally participate in membership solicitation if the 30 solicitation might reasonably be perceived as coercive or if the membership 31 solicitation is essentially a fundraising mechanism, except as permitted in 32 Canon 4C(3)(d)(i); 33 34 (iv) shall not permit the use of the prestige of his or her judicial office for 35 fundraising or membership solicitation but may be a speaker, guest of honor, 36 or recipient of an award for public or charitable service provided the judge 37 does not personally solicit funds and complies with Canons 4A(1), (2), (3), 38 and (4). 39 40 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4C(3)(d) 41 A judge may solicit membership or endorse or encourage membership efforts for 42 an organization devoted to the improvement of the law, the legal system, or the 43

34 administration of justice,* or a nonprofit educational, religious, charitable, service,* or 1 civic organization as long as the solicitation cannot reasonably be perceived as coercive 2 and is not essentially a fundraising mechanism. Solicitation of funds or memberships for 3 an organization similarly involves the danger that the person solicited will feel obligated 4 to respond favorably if the solicitor is in a position of influence or control.

A judge must 5 not engage in direct, individual solicitation of funds or memberships in person, in 6 writing, or by telephone except in the following cases: (1) a judge may solicit other 7 judges (excluding court commissioners, referees, retired judges, court-appointed 8 arbitrators, hearing officers, and temporary judges*) for funds or memberships; (2) a 9 judge may solicit other persons for membership in the organizations described above if 10 neither those persons nor persons with whom they are affiliated are likely ever to appear 11 before the court on which the judge serves; and (3) a judge who is an officer of such an 12 organization may send a general membership solicitation mailing over the judge’s 13 signature. 14 When deciding whether to make recommendations to public and private fund- 15 granting organizations on projects and programs concerning the law, the legal system, or 16 the administration of justice,* a judge should consider whether that conduct would 17 violate any other provision of this code.

For a list of factors to consider, see the 18 explanation of “law, the legal system, or the administration of justice” in the 19 Terminology section. 20 Use of an organization’s letterhead for fundraising or membership solicitation 21 does not violate Canon 4C(3)(d), provided the letterhead lists only the judge’s name and 22 office or other position in the organization, and designates the judge’s judicial title only 23 if other persons whose names appear on the letterhead have comparable designations.

In 24 addition, a judge must also make reasonable efforts to ensure that the judge’s staff, court 25 officials, and others subject to the judge’s direction and control do not solicit funds on 26 the judge’s behalf for any purpose, charitable or otherwise. 27 28 (

e) A judge may encourage lawyers to provide pro bono publico legal services. 29 30 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4C(3)(e) 31 In addition to appointing lawyers to serve as counsel for indigent parties in 32 individual cases, a judge may promote broader access to justice by encouraging lawyers 33 to participate in pro bono publico legal services, as long as the judge does not employ 34 coercion or abuse the prestige of judicial office. 35 36 D. Financial Activities 37 38

(1) A judge shall not engage in financial and business dealings that 39 40 (

a) may reasonably be perceived to exploit the judge’s judicial position, or 41 42

35 (

b) involve the judge in frequent transactions or continuing business relationships 1 with lawyers or other persons likely to appear before the court on which the judge 2 serves. 3 4 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4D(1) 5 The Time for Compliance provision of this code (Canon 6F) postpones the time for 6 compliance with certain provisions of this canon in some cases.

A judge must avoid 7 financial and business dealings that involve the judge in frequent transactions or 8 continuing business relationships with persons likely to appear either before the judge 9 personally or before other judges on the judge’s court. A judge shall discourage 10 members of the judge’s family* from engaging in dealings that would reasonably appear 11 to exploit the judge’s judicial position or that would involve family members in frequent 12 transactions or continuing business relationships with persons likely to appear before the 13 judge.

This rule is necessary to avoid creating an appearance of exploitation of office or 14 favoritism and to minimize the potential for disqualification. 15 Participation by a judge in financial and business dealings is subject to the 16 general prohibitions in Canon 4A against activities that tend to reflect adversely on 17 impartiality,* demean the judicial office, or interfere with the proper performance of 18 judicial duties.

Such participation is also subject to the general prohibition in Canon 2 19 against activities involving impropriety* or the appearance of impropriety* and the 20 prohibition in Canon 2B against the misuse of the prestige of judicial office. 21 In addition, a judge must maintain high standards of conduct in all of the judge’s 22 activities, as set forth in Canon 1. 23 24

(2) A judge may, subject to the requirements of this code, hold and manage 25 investments of the judge and members of the judge’s family,* including real estate, 26 and engage in other remunerative activities. A judge shall not participate in, nor 27 permit the judge’s name to be used in connection with, any business venture or 28 commercial advertising that indicates the judge’s title or affiliation with the judiciary 29 or otherwise lend the power or prestige of his or her office to promote a business or 30 any commercial venture. 31 32

(3) A judge shall not serve as an officer, director, manager, or employee of a business 33 affected with a public interest, including, without limitation, a financial institution, 34 insurance company, or public utility. 35 36 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4D(3) 37 Although participation by a judge in business activities might otherwise be 38 permitted by Canon 4D, a judge may be prohibited from participation by other provisions 39 of this code when, for example, the business entity frequently appears before the judge’s 40 court or the participation requires significant time away from judicial duties.

Similarly, 41 a judge must avoid participating in any business activity if the judge’s participation 42 would involve misuse of the prestige of judicial office. See Canon 2B. 43

(4) A judge shall manage personal investments and financial activities so as to 1 minimize the necessity for disqualification. As soon as reasonably possible, a judge 2 shall divest himself or herself of investments and other financial interests that would 3 require frequent disqualification. 4 5

(5) Under no circumstance shall a judge accept a gift,* bequest, or favor if the donor 6 is a party whose interests have come or are reasonably likely to come before the 7 judge. A judge shall discourage members of the judge’s family residing in the judge's 8 household* from accepting similar benefits from parties who have come or are 9 reasonably likely to come before the judge. 10 11 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4D(5) 12 In addition to the prohibitions set forth in Canon 4D(5) regarding gifts,* other 13 laws* may be applicable to judges, including, for example, Code of Civil Procedure 14

section 170.9 and the Political Reform Act of 1974 (Gov. Code, § 81000 et seq.). 15 Canon 4D(5) does not apply to contributions to a judge’s campaign for judicial 16 office, a matter governed by Canon 5, although such contributions may give rise to an 17 obligation by the judge to disqualify or disclose. See Canon 3E(2)(

b) and accompanying 18 Commentary and Code of Civil Procedure

section 170.1, subdivision (a)(9). 19 Because a gift,* bequest, or favor to a member of the judge’s family residing in the 20 judge’s household* might be viewed as intended to influence the judge, a judge must 21 inform those family members of the relevant ethical constraints upon the judge in this 22 regard and urge them to take these constraints into account when making decisions about 23 accepting such gifts,* bequests, or favors.

A judge cannot, however, reasonably be 24 expected to know or control all of the financial or business activities of all family 25 members residing in the judge's household.* 26 The application of Canon 4D(5) requires recognition that a judge cannot 27 reasonably be expected to anticipate all persons or interests that may come before the 28 court. 29 30

(6) A judge shall not accept and shall discourage members of the judge’s family 31 residing in the judge’s household* from accepting a gift,* bequest, favor, or loan from 32 anyone except as hereinafter set forth. Gifts* that are permitted by Canons 4D(6)(a) 33 through (

i) may only be accepted if the gift,* bequest, favor, or loan would neither 34 influence nor reasonably be perceived as intended to influence the judge in the 35 performance of judicial duties: 36 37 (

a) a gift,* bequest, favor, or loan from a person whose preexisting relationship 38 with the judge would prevent the judge under Canon 3E from hearing a case 39 involving that person; 40 41 42 43

37 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4D(6)(a) 1 Upon appointment or election as a judge or within a reasonable period of time 2 thereafter, a judge may attend an event honoring the judge’s appointment or election as a 3 judge provided that (1) the judge would otherwise be disqualified from hearing any 4 matter involving the person or entity holding or funding the event, and (2) a reasonable 5 person would not conclude that attendance at the event undermines the judge’s 6 integrity,* impartiality,* or independence.* 7 8 (

b) a gift* for a special occasion from a relative or friend, if the gift* is fairly 9 commensurate with the occasion and the relationship; 10 11 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4D(6)(b) 12 A gift* to a judge, or to a member of the judge’s family residing in the judge’s 13 household,* that is excessive in value raises questions about the judge’s impartiality* 14 and the integrity* of the judicial office and might require disqualification of the judge 15 where disqualification would not otherwise be required. See, however, Canon 4D(6)(a). 16 17 (

c) commercial or financial opportunities and benefits, including special pricing 18 and discounts, and loans from lending institutions in their regular course of 19 business, if the same opportunities and benefits or loans are made available on the 20 same terms to similarly situated persons who are not judges; 21 22 (

d) any gift* incidental to a public testimonial, or educational or resource materials 23 supplied by publishers on a complimentary basis for official use, or a discounted 24 or complimentary membership in a bar-related association, or an invitation to the 25 judge and the judge’s spouse or registered domestic partner* or guest to attend a 26 bar-related function or an activity devoted to the improvement of the law, the legal 27 system, or the administration of justice;* 28 29 (

e) advances or reimbursement for the reasonable cost of travel, transportation, 30 lodging, and subsistence that is directly related to participation in any judicial, 31 educational, civic, or governmental program or bar-related function or activity 32 devoted to the improvement of the law, the legal system, or the administration of 33 justice;* 34 35 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4D(6)(e) 36 Acceptance of an invitation to a law-related function is governed by Canon 37 4D(6)(d); acceptance of an invitation paid for by an individual lawyer or group of 38 lawyers is governed by Canon 4D(6)(g). See also Canon 4H(2) and accompanying 39 Commentary. 40 41 (

f) a gift,* award, or benefit incident to the business, profession, or other separate 42 activity of a spouse or registered domestic partner* or other member of the judge’s 43

38 family residing in the judge’s household,* including gifts,* awards, and benefits 1 for the use of both the spouse or registered domestic partner* or other family 2 member and the judge; 3 4 (

g) ordinary social hospitality; 5 6 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4D(6)(g) 7 Although Canon 4D(6)(

g) does not preclude ordinary social hospitality, a judge 8 should carefully weigh acceptance of such hospitality to avoid any appearance of 9 impropriety* or bias or any appearance that the judge is misusing the prestige of judicial 10 office. See Canons 2 and 2B. A judge should also consider whether acceptance would 11 affect the integrity,* impartiality,* or independence* of the judiciary. See Canon 2A. 12 13 (

h) an invitation to the judge and the judge’s spouse, registered domestic partner,* 14 or guest to attend an event sponsored by an educational, religious, charitable, 15 service,* or civic organization with which the judge is associated or involved, if 16 the same invitation is offered to persons who are not judges and who are similarly 17 engaged with the organization. 18 19 (

i) a nominal gift,* provided the gift* is not from a lawyer, law firm, or other 20 person likely to appear before the court on which the judge serves, unless one or 21 more of the exceptions in this canon applies. 22 23 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4D(6)(i) 24 For example, nominal gifts* include snacks or a token memento from jurors, 25 keychains or pens provided by vendors at legal conferences, or handicrafts or art 26 projects from students. 27 A judge should carefully weigh acceptance of any nominal gift to avoid any 28 appearance of impropriety* or bias or any appearance that the judge is misusing the 29 prestige of judicial office.

See Canons 2 and 2B. A judge should also consider whether 30 acceptance would affect the integrity,* impartiality,* or independence* of the judiciary. 31 See Canon 2A. 32 33

(7) A judge may accept the following, provided that doing so would neither influence 34 nor reasonably be perceived as intended to influence the judge in the performance of 35 judicial duties: 36 37 (

a) a scholarship or fellowship awarded on the same terms and based on the same 38 criteria applied to other applicants; 39 40 (

b) rewards and prizes given to competitors or participants in random drawings, 41 contests, or other events that are open to persons who are not judges. 42 43

39 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canons 4D(6) and 4D(7) 1 The references to such scholarships, fellowships, rewards, and prizes were moved 2 from Canon 4D(6) to Canon 4D(7) because they are not considered to be gifts* under 3 this code, and a judge may accept them. 4 5 E. Fiduciary* Activities 6 7

(1) A judge shall not serve as executor, administrator, or other personal 8 representative, trustee, guardian, attorney in fact, or other fiduciary,* except for the 9 estate, trust, or person of a member of the judge’s family,* and then only if such 10 service will not interfere with the proper performance of judicial duties. A judge may, 11 however, act as a health care representative pursuant to an advance health care 12 directive for a person whose preexisting relationship with the judge would prevent the 13 judge from hearing a case involving that person under Canon 3E(1). 14 15

(2) A judge shall not serve as a fiduciary* if it is likely that the judge as a fiduciary* 16 will be engaged in proceedings that would ordinarily come before the judge, or if the 17 estate, trust, or minor or conservatee will be engaged in contested proceedings in the 18 court on which the judge serves or one under its appellate jurisdiction. 19 20

(3) The same restrictions on financial activities that apply to a judge personally also 21 apply to the judge while acting in a fiduciary* capacity. 22 23 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4E 24 The Time for Compliance provision of this code (Canon 6F) postpones the time for 25 compliance with certain provisions of this canon in some cases. 26 The restrictions imposed by this canon may conflict with the judge’s obligation as 27 a fiduciary.* For example, a judge shall resign as trustee if detriment to the trust would 28 result from divestiture of trust holdings the retention of which would place the judge in 29 violation of Canon 4D(4). 30 31 F.

Service as Arbitrator or Mediator 32 33 A judge shall not act as an arbitrator or mediator or otherwise perform judicial functions 34 in a private capacity unless expressly authorized by law.* 35 36 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4F 37 Canon 4F does not prohibit a judge from participating in arbitration, mediation, 38 or settlement conferences performed as part of his or her judicial duties. 39 40 G. Practice of Law 41 42 A judge shall not practice law. 43

40 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4G 1 This prohibition refers to the practice of law in a representative capacity and not 2 in a pro se capacity. A judge may act for himself or herself in all legal matters, including 3 matters involving litigation and matters involving appearances before or other deal ings 4 with legislative and other governmental bodies.

However, in so doing, a judge must not 5 abuse the prestige of office to advance the interests of the judge or member of the judge’s 6 family.* See Canon 2B. 7 This prohibition applies to subordinate judicial officers,* magistrates, special 8 masters, and judges of the State Bar Court. 9 10 H.

Compensation, Reimbursement, and Honoraria 11 12 A judge may receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses as provided by law* 13 for the extrajudicial activities permitted by this code, if the source of such payments does 14 not give the appearance of influencing the judge’s performance of judicial duties or 15 otherwise give the appearance of impropriety.* 16 17

(1) Compensation shall not exceed a reasonable amount nor shall it exceed what a 18 person who is not a judge would receive for the same activity. 19 20

(2) Expense reimbursement shall be limited to the actual cost of travel, food, lodging, 21 and other costs reasonably incurred by the judge and, where appropriate to the 22 occasion, by the judge’s spouse, registered domestic partner,* or guest. Any payment 23 in excess of such an amount is compensation. 24 25

(3) No judge shall accept any honorarium. “Honorarium” means any payment made 26 in consideration for a speech given, an

article published, or attendance at any public 27 or private conference, convention, meeting, social event, meal, or like gathering. 28 “Honorarium” does not include earned income for personal services that are 29 customarily provided in connection with the practice of a bona fide business, trade, or 30 profession, such as teaching or writing for a publisher, and does not include fees or 31 other things of value received pursuant to Penal Code

section 94.5 for performance of 32 a marriage.

For purposes of this canon, “teaching” includes presentations to impart 33 educational information to lawyers in events qualifying for credit under Minimum 34 Continuing Legal Education, to students in bona fide educational institutions, and to 35 associations or groups of judges. 36 37 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 4H 38 Judges should not accept compensation or reimbursement of expenses if 39 acceptance would appear to a reasonable person to undermine the judge’s integrity,* 40 impartiality,* or independence.* 41 A judge must assure himself or herself that acceptance of reimbursement or fee 42 waivers would not appear to a reasonable person to undermine the judge’s 43

41 independence,* integrity,* or impartiality.* The factors a judge should consider when 1 deciding whether to accept reimbursement or a fee waiver for attendance at a particular 2 activity include whether: 3 4 (

a) the sponsor is an accredited educational institution or bar association rather 5 than a trade association or a for-profit entity; 6 7 (

b) the funding comes largely from numerous contributors rather than from a 8 single entity, and whether the funding is earmarked for programs with specific 9 content; 10 11 (

c) the content is related or unrelated to the subject matter of a pending* or 12 impending* proceeding before the judge, or to matters that are likely to come 13 before the judge; 14 15 (

d) the activity is primarily educational rather than recreational, and whether the 16 costs of the event are reasonable and comparable to those associated with similar 17 events sponsored by the judiciary, bar associations, or similar groups; 18 19 (

e) information concerning the activity and its funding sources is available upon 20 inquiry; 21 22 (

f) the sponsor or source of funding is generally associated with particular parties 23 or interests currently appearing or likely to appear in the judge’s court, thus 24 possibly requiring disqualification of the judge; 25 26 (

g) differing viewpoints are presented; 27 28 (

h) a broad range of judicial and nonjudicial participants are invited; or 29 30 (

i) the program is designed specifically for judges. 31 32 Judges should be aware of the statutory limitations on accepting gifts.* 33

42 CANON 5 1 2 A JUDGE OR CANDIDATE FOR JUDICIAL OFFICE* SHALL NOT ENGAGE 3 IN POLITICAL OR CAMPAIGN ACTIVITY THAT IS INCONSISTENT WITH 4 THE INDEPENDENCE,* INTEGRITY,* OR IMPARTIALITY* OF THE 5 JUDICIARY 6 7 Judges and candidates for judicial office* are entitled to entertain their personal views on 8 political questions.

They are not required to surrender their rights or opinions as citizens. 9 They shall, however, not engage in political activity that may create the appea rance of 10 political bias or impropriety.* Judicial independence,* impartiality,* and integrity* shall 11 dictate the conduct of judges and candidates for judicial office.* 12 13 Judges and candidates for judicial office* shall comply with all applicable election, 14 election campaign, and election campaign fundraising laws* and regulations. 15 16 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 5 17 The term “political activity” should not be construed so narrowly as to prevent 18 private comment. 19 20 A.

Political Organizations* 21 22 Judges and candidates for judicial office* shall not 23 24 (1) act as leaders or hold any office in a political organization;* 25 26 (2) make speeches for a political organization* or candidate for nonjudicial office, or 27 publicly endorse or publicly oppose a candidate for nonjudicial office; or 28 29 (3) personally solicit funds for a political organization* or nonjudicial candidate; or 30 make contributions to a political party or political organization* or to a nonjudicial 31 candidate in excess of $500 in any calendar year per political party or political 32 organization* or candidate, or in excess of an aggregate of $1,000 in any calendar 33 year for all political parties or political organizations* or nonjudicial candidates. 34 35 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 5A 36 This provision does not prohibit a judge or a candidate for judicial office* from 37 signing a petition to qualify a measure for the ballot, provided the judge does not use his 38 or her official title. 39 Although attendance at political gatherings is not prohibited, any such attendance 40 should be restricted so that it would not constitute an express public endorsement of a 41 nonjudicial candidate or a measure not affecting the law, the legal system, or the 42 administration of justice* otherwise prohibited by this canon. 43

43 Subject to the monetary limitation herein to political contributions, a judge or a 1 candidate for judicial office* may purchase tickets for political dinners or other similar 2 dinner functions. Any admission price to such a political dinner or function in excess of 3 the actual cost of the meal will be considered a political contribution.

The prohibition in 4 Canon 5A(3) does not preclude judges from contributing to a campaign fund for 5 distribution among judges who are candidates for reelection or retention, nor does it 6 apply to contributions to any judge or candidate for judicial office.* 7 Under this canon, a judge may publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for judicial 8 office.* Such positions are permitted because judicial officers have a special obligation 9 to uphold the integrity,* impartiality,* and independence* of the judiciary and are in a 10 unique position to know the qualifications necessary to serve as a competent judicial 11 officer. 12 Although family members of the judge or candidate for judicial office* are not 13 subject to the provisions of this code, a judge or candidate for judicial office* shall not 14 avoid compliance with this code by making contributions through a spouse or registered 15 domestic partner* or other family member. 16 17 B.

Conduct During Judicial Campaigns and Appointment Process 18 19

(1) A candidate for judicial office* or an applicant seeking appointment to judicial 20 office shall not: 21 22 (

a) make statements to the electorate or the appointing authority that commit the 23 candidate or the applicant with respect to cases, controversies, or issues that are 24 likely to come before the courts, or 25 26 (

b) knowingly,* or with reckless disregard for the truth, make false or misleading 27 statements about the identity, qualifications, present position, or any other fact 28 concerning himself or herself or his or her opponent or other applicants. 29 30

(2) A candidate for judicial office* shall review and approve the content of all 31 campaign statements and materials produced by the candidate or his or her campaign 32 committee before its dissemination. A candidate shall take appropriate corrective 33 action if the candidate learns of any misrepresentations made in his or her campaign 34 statements or materials. A candidate shall take reasonable measures to prevent any 35 misrepresentations being made in his or her support by third parties.

A candidate 36 shall take reasonable measures to ensure that appropriate corrective action is taken if 37 the candidate learns of any misrepresentations being made in his or her support by 38 third parties. 39 40

(3) Every candidate for judicial office* shall complete a judicial campaign ethics 41 course approved by the Supreme Court no earlier than one year before or no later than 42 60 days after the filing of a declaration of intention by the candidate, the formation of 43

44 a campaign committee, or the receipt of any campaign contribution, whichever is 1 earliest.

If a judge appears on the ballot as a result of a petition indicating that a 2 write-in campaign will be conducted for the office, the judge shall complete the 3 course no later than 60 days after receiving notice of the filing of the petition, the 4 formation of a campaign committee, or the receipt of any campaign contribution, 5 whichever is earliest. 6 7 Unless a judge forms a campaign committee or solicits or receives campaign 8 contributions, this requirement does not apply to judges who are unopposed for 9 election and will not appear on the ballot. 10 11 Unless an appellate justice forms a campaign committee or solicits or receives 12 campaign contributions, this requirement does not apply to appellate justices. 13 14 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 5B 15 The purpose of Canon 5B is to preserve the integrity* of the appointive and 16 elective process for judicial office and to ensure that the public has accurate information 17 about candidates for judicial office.* Compliance with these provisions will enhance the 18 integrity,* impartiality,* and independence* of the judiciary and better inform the public 19 about qualifications of candidates for judicial office.* 20 This code does not contain the “announce clause” that was the subject of the 21 United States Supreme Court’s decision in Republican Party of Minnesota v.

White 22 (2002) 536 U.S. 765. That opinion did not address the “commit clause,” which is 23 contained in Canon 5B(1)(a). The phrase “appear to commit” has been deleted because, 24 although candidates for judicial office* cannot promise to take a particular position on 25 cases, controversies, or issues prior to taking the bench and presiding over individual 26 cases, the phrase may have been overinclusive. 27 Canon 5B(1)(

b) prohibits knowingly making false or misleading statements during 28 an election campaign because doing so would violate Canons 1 and 2A, and may violate 29 other canons. 30 The time limit for completing a judicial campaign ethics course in Canon 5B(3) is 31 triggered by the earliest of one of the following: the filing of a declaration of intention, 32 the formation of a campaign committee, or the receipt of any campaign contribution.

If a 33 judge’s name appears on the ballot as a result of a petition indicating that a write-in 34 campaign will be conducted, the time limit for completing the course is triggered by the 35 earliest of one of the following: the notice of the filing of the petition, the formation of a 36 campaign committee, or the receipt of any campaign contribution. A financial 37 contribution by a candidate for judicial office* to his or her own campaign constitutes 38 receipt of a campaign contribution. 39 40

(4) In judicial elections, judges may solicit campaign contributions or endorsements for 41 their own campaigns or for other judges and attorneys who are candidates for judicial 42 office.* Judges are permitted to solicit such contributions and endorsements from 43

45 anyone, including attorneys and other judges, except that a judge shall not solicit 1 campaign contributions or endorsements from California state court commissioners, 2 referees, court-appointed arbitrators, hearing officers, and retired judges serving in the 3 Temporary Assigned Judges Program, or from California state court personnel. In 4 soliciting campaign contributions or endorsements, a judge shall not use the prestige of 5 judicial office in a manner that would reasonably be perceived as coercive. See Canons 6 1, 2, 2A, and 2B. 7 8 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 5B(4) 9 Regarding campaign contributions for a judge’s own campaign, see Canon 10 3E(2)(

b) and accompanying Commentary addressing disclosure of campaign 11 contributions. See also Code of Civil Procedure

section 170.1, subdivision (a)(9), which 12 provides that a judge is disqualified if the judge has received a campaign contribution 13 exceeding $1,500 from a party or an attorney in the proceeding. Although it is improper 14 for a judge to receive a gift* from an attorney subject to exceptions noted in Canon 15 4D(6), a judge’s campaign may receive attorney contributions. See also Government 16 Code

section 8314, which prohibits any elected state or local officer from using public 17 resources, including buildings, telephones, and state-compensated time, for a campaign 18 activity. Under

section 8314, subdivision (b)(2), “campaign activity” does not include 19 “the incidental and minimal use of public resources, such as equipment or office space, 20 for campaign purposes, including the referral of unsolicited political mail, telephone 21 calls, and visitors to private political entities.” 22 Even though it is permissible for a judge to solicit endorsements and campaign 23 funds for attorneys who are candidates for judicial office,* the judge must be cautious. 24 Such solicitation may raise issues of disqualification and disclosure under Code of Civil 25 Procedure

section 170.1, subdivision (a), and Canon 3E. Even if the judge is not 26 disqualified, disclosure may be required under Canon 3E(2)(a). For example, a judge 27 who has solicited campaign funds or endorsements for a candidate who is an attorney 28 must consider disclosing that solicitation in all cases in which the attorney candidate 29 appears before the judge.

The judge should also consider Canon 4A(1) and Canon 30 4A(4), which require a judge to conduct extrajudicial activities so they do not cast 31 reasonable doubt on the judge’s capacity to act impartially* or lead to frequent 32 disqualification. 33 “Judicial elections” includes recall elections. 34 35 C. Speaking at Political Gatherings 36 37 Candidates for judicial office* may speak to political gatherings only on their own behalf 38 or on behalf of another candidate for judicial office.* 39 40 41 42 43

46 D. Measures to Improve the Law 1 2 A judge or candidate for judicial office* may engage in activity in relation to measures 3 concerning improvement of the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice,* 4 only if the conduct is consistent with this code. 5 6 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 5D 7 When deciding whether to engage in activity relating to measures concerning the 8 law, the legal system, or the administration of justice,* such as commenting publicly on 9 ballot measures, a judge must consider whether the conduct would violate any other 10 provisions of this code.

See the explanation of “law, the legal system, or the 11 administration of justice” in the Terminology section. 12

47 CANON 6 1 2 COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE OF JUDICIAL ETHICS 3 4 A. Judges 5 6 Anyone who is an officer of the state judicial system and who performs judicial functions 7 including, but not limited to, a subordinate judicial officer,* a magistrate, a court - 8 appointed arbitrator, a judge of the State Bar Court, a temporary judge,* or a special 9 master, is a judge within the meaning of this code.

All judges shall comply with this 10 code except as provided below. 11 12 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 6A 13 For the purposes of this canon, if a retired judge is serving in the Temporary 14 Assigned Judges Program, the judge is considered to “perform judicial functions.” 15 Because retired judges who are privately retained may perform judicial functions, their 16 conduct while performing those functions should be guided by this code. 17 18 B.

Retired Judge Serving in the Temporary Assigned Judges Program 19 20 A retired judge who has filed an application to serve on assignment, meets the eligibility 21 requirements set by the Chief Justice for service, and has received an acknowledgment of 22 participation in the Temporary Assigned Judges Program shall comply with all provisions 23 of this code, except for the following: 24 25 4C(2)—Appointment to governmental positions 26 27 4E—Fiduciary* activities 28 29 C.

Retired Judge as Arbitrator or Mediator 30 31 A retired judge serving in the Temporary Assigned Judges Program is not required to 32 comply with Canon 4F of this code relating to serving as an arbitrator or mediator, or 33 performing judicial functions in a private capacity, except as otherwise provided in the 34 Standards and Guidelines for Judicial Assignments promulgated by the Chief Justice. 35 36 ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY: Canon 6C 37

Article VI,

section 6 of the California Constitution provides that a “retired judge 38 who consents may be assigned to any court” by the Chief Justice. Retired judges who 39 are serving in the Temporary Assigned Judges Program pursuant to the above provision 40 are bound by Canon 6B, including the requirement of Canon 4G barring the practice o f 41 law. Other provisions of California law,* and standards and guidelines for eligibility 42

48 and service set by the Chief Justice, further define the limitations on who may serve on 1 assignment. 2 3 D. Temporary Judge,* Referee, or Court-Appointed Arbitrator 1 4 5 A temporary judge,* a person serving as a referee pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 6

section 638 or 639, or a court-appointed arbitrator shall comply only with the following 7 code provisions: 8 9

(1) A temporary judge,* a referee, or a court-appointed arbitrator shall comply with 10 Canons 1 [integrity* and independence* of the judiciary], 2A [promoting public 11 confidence], 3B(3) [order and decorum], 3B(4) [patient, dignified, and courteous 12 treatment], 3B(6) [require* lawyers to refrain from manifestations of any form of bias 13 or prejudice], 3D(1) [action regarding misconduct by another judge], and 3D(2) 14 [action regarding misconduct by a lawyer], when the temporary judge,* referee, or 15 court-appointed arbitrator is actually presiding in a proceeding or communicating with 16 the parties, counsel, or staff or court personnel while serving in the capacity of a 17 temporary judge,* referee, or court-appointed arbitrator in the case. 18 19

(2) A temporary judge,* referee, or court-appointed arbitrator shall, from the time of 20 notice and acceptance of appointment until termination of the appointment: 21 22 (

a) Comply with Canons 2B(1) [not allow family or other relationships to 23 influence judicial conduct], 3B(1) [hear and

Document details

Collection	California Superior Local Rules
Citation	193ed2d7599a3b3c5c8b7c683f332716ed5c9359
Type	court_rule
Language	en
Format	pdf
Source	CA_LOCAL
Identifier	193ed2d7599a3b3c5c8b7c683f332716ed5c9359

Source file is stored in the law ingest library (pdf).