Rainville v. Pontin, 2013 ABQB 569

Court of Queen ’ s Bench of Alberta Citation: Rainville v. Pontin, 2013 ABQB 569 Date: 20131001 Docket: 0803 14738 Registry: Edmonton Between: Robert Rainville and Laura Rainville Plaintiffs - and - Thomas Pontin and Johanna Pontin Defendants And Between: Thomas Pontin, Johanna Pontin, Timothy Pontin and Jackie Pontin Plaintiffs by Counterclaim - and - Robert Rainville, Laura Rainville, James Henning and Margaret Henning Defendants by Counterclaim _ ________________________________________ ______________ Supplemental Memorandum of Decision of the Honourable Mr. Justice R.P.

Marceau _________________________________________ ______________ [ 1 ] This is a supplemental Memorandum of Decision to Rainville v. Pontin, 2013 ABQB 256 , filed on April 29, 2013 in this action, after receipt of further input from counsel. [ 2 ] Objection No. 10: Counsel for the Rainvilles and Hennings state there was an attempt to obtain information required to

prepare an offer. While the offer itself may be without prejudice and privileged, I do not see how obtaining information to make a without prejudice offer is covered by privilege. The document will be produced. [ 3 ] Objection No. 11: Just because a matter in dispute has been settled, does not mean the whole matter involving the white house is irrelevant to the ongoing litigation. The questions in issue will be answered. Heard on the 13 th day of March, 2013. Dated at the City of Edmonton, Alberta this 30 th day of September, 2013. R.P. Marceau J.C.Q.B.A. Appearances: William B.

Hogle, Q.C. for the Plaintiffs/Defendants by Counterclaim John C. Bilsland, Weir Bowen LLP for the Defendants/Plaintiffs by Counterclaim