Roberts v Edmonton Northlands, 2017 ABQB 506

Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta Citation: Roberts v Edmonton Northlands, 2017 ABQB 506 Date: 20170816 Docket: 1603 04883 Registry: Edmonton Between: Janet A. Roberts, Lorianne Marie Wooldridge, Teresa Gail Hooper-Troudt, Sonia Jean Phillips, Tammy Lynne Lockwood, Mary Gaye Gray, Denise Dion, Kathryn Ann Millar, Monique Elise M.

Labonte, Sarah Esther Pollard, Donnagail Nally, Karen Gail Carlson, Sherry Elaine Chaba, Margaret Burton, Annette Margaret Martin, Ashley Elizabeth Carlson, Angela Karen Pegg, Judith Marlaine Hryniw, Annie Mary Handfield Plaintiffs - and - Edmonton Northlands and Tim Reid Defendants _______________________________________________________ Reasons for Decision of L.A.

Smart , Master, Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta _______________________________________________________ Introduction [ 1 ] Attached are two indexes, the first being redacted and unredacted versions of Edmonton Northlands documents included in their Affidavit of Records and second, redacted and unredacted versions of documents provided in response to undertakings of Tim Reid. I have reviewed the two respective binders containing these documents and have made a determination as to the appropriateness of the redactions and whether content ought to be produced.

Affidavit of Records [ 2 ] Under Tab7 at page 638 the line items under the heading 3. BUDGET shall be set out in full with the exception that the amounts for each item may remain redacted. [ 3 ] Under tab 14 at page 689 the Bar Graph on the left-hand side of the slide entitled Parking labor analysis shall be disclosed. [ 4 ] Under tab 16 page 726 shall be produced with the exception of the Cost to Implement for the Consulting Support EIA. [ 5 ] Otherwise, I have concluded that the redactions contain nothing relevant and material requiring production in Edmonton Northlands’ Affidavit of Records.

Answers to Undertakings [ 6 ] I have concluded that the redactions are appropriate and their content is of no relevance. Settling Minutes of Order [ 7 ] Counsel do not agree on the terms of the Order granted on other matters at the application. Under the circumstances, I directed counsel for Edmonton Northlands to obtain a transcript of the proceeding and provide a copy to counsel for the Plaintiffs.

If after their review of the transcript, Counsel remain unable to agree then they will provide their positions to me by letter with a copy of the transcript highlighted with the parts that are relevant to the dispute. Costs of obtaining the transcript shall be borne equally between the Plaintiffs and the Defendants, respectively. Dated at the City of Edmonton, Alberta this 16 th day of August, 2017. L.A. Smart M.C.Q.B.A.

Appearances: Glenda L Pidde Hall, Van Campenhout & Pidde for the Plaintiffs David D Risling McLennan Ross LLP for the Defendants The Indexes are omitted from the unofficial electronic version of the judgment. They are included with the official filed version of the judgment.