2016 QCCQ 10527, 2016 QCCQ 10527

Protection de la jeunesse — 164344 2016 QCCQ 10527 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division No: 610-41-000403-097 DATE: July 4, 2016 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE JOSÉE BÉLANGER J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X , born on [...], 2002 [Social Worker 1] , duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection working at Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux A, having a place of business at [...] in Town A, district A (Quebec) [...] Applicant and A , residing and domiciled at [...] in Town B, district B (Quebec) [...] Mother ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified.

Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 Y.P.A.). [ 1 ] After the filing of a petition asking the Court to review and extend a decision rendered by this Court on July 9, 2015, the parties submit to the Court a draft agreement on measures to put an end to the situation that compromises the youth’s development. [ 2 ] The youth is present and represented. The mother is present but is not represented.

She does not wish to be represented even if the Court has explained to her, her rights in this regard. [ 3 ] The parties acknowledge the facts that still endanger the security or development of the youth. The draft agreement details those facts.

The measures proposed to the Court in order to put an end to that situation are enumerated as well in the draft agreement filed on D-11. [ 4 ] The consent of the parties was given in a free and enlightened manner and the Court verified with them the validity of their consent. [ 5 ] The Court is of the opinion that these measures are likely to put an end to the situation that still compromises the youth’s situation.

For these reasons the Court: [ 6 ] maintains that the security or development of X, born on [...], 2002, is still compromised according to the Youth Protection Act ; [ 7 ] Ratifies the measures enumerated in the draft agreement filed on D-11; [ 8 ] Orders the implementation of the said measures; [ 9 ] Entrusts the situation of X to the Director of Youth Protection for the execution of this judgment. __________________________________ Josée Bélanger, J.C.Q. Me Julie Lemire, attorney for the Director of Youth Protection

Me Peggy Warolin, attorney for the youth Date of hearing: June 8, 2016