2023 QCCA 1566, 2023 QCCA 1566
Opinion
Malobabic c. Barreau du Québec 2023 QCCA 1566 COURT OF APPEAL CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC REGISTRY OF MONTREAL No.: 500-09-030369-235 , 500-09-030370-233 ( 500-17-059790-108 , 500-17-050673-097 ) MINUTES OF THE HEARING DATE: November 13, 2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MARTIN VAUCLAIR, J.C.A. PATRICK HEALY, J.C.A. MICHEL BEAUPRÉ, J.C.A.
No.: 500-09-030369-235 APPELLANT Brana Malobabic Unrepresented By videoconference RESPONDENTS COUNSEL Barreau du québec Mtre Jany Tessier ( Bélanger Longtin ) fonds d'assurance-responsabilité professionnelle du barreau du Québec Mtre Claudia Tremblay ( Cain Lamarre ) heenan blackie stephan H. trihey Mtre Émile Janda ( Gilbert Simard Tremblay ) stephen g. schenke douglas C. mitchell Mtre François Marchand ( De Grandpré Chait ) IMPLEADED PARTY
monroi inc. Unrepresented Absent No.: 500-09-030370-233 APPELLANT Brana Malobabic Mtre Unrepresented By videoconference RESPONDENT COUNSEL Daniel F. O'Connor Mtre Luc Séguin ( Timmons Séguin Trembla ) IMPLEADED PARTIES monroi inc. 4278020 canada inc. Unrepresented Absent s 500-09-030369-235 On appeal from a judgment rendered on December 20, 2022, by the Honourable Paul Mayer of the Superior Court , District of Montreal . 500-09-030370-233 On appeal from a judgment rendered on December 20, 2022, by the Honourable Paul Mayer of the Superior Court , District of Montreal .
DESCRIPTION: 500-09-030369-235 Application to Dimiss an Appeal from the respondent Fonds d'Assurance-Responsabilité du Barreau du Québec (article 365 C.C.P .). Amended application to Dismiss an Appeal from respondents Heenan Blackie and Stephan H. Trihey (article 365 C.C.P .). Application to Dismiss an Appeal from respondents Stepĥen G. Schenke and Douglas C. Mitchell (article 365 C.C.P .). Application to Dismiss an Appeal from respondent Barreau du Québec (article 365 C.C.P .). 500-09-030370-233 Application to Dimiss an Appeal (article 365 C.C.P .).
Clerk at the hearing : René Gutknecht Courtroom: Pierre-Basile-Mignault HEARING 12:03 Commencement of the hearing. Identification of the parties and their counsel. 12:05 Discussion between the Court and the counsel. 12:07 Submissions by Mtre Marchand. 12:12 Submissions by Mtre Séguin. 12:13 Submissions by Mrs. Malobabic. 12:34 Recess of the hearing. 12:42 Resumption of the hearing. BY THE COURT: Judgment – see page 5. 12:44 Conclusion of the hearing.
René Gutknecht, Clerk at the hearing JUDGMENT [ 1 ] On December 20 th , 2022, the Superior Court, Civil Division, district of Montreal, (the honorable Paul Mayer), granted respondents motion « afin de faire constater le désistement de la demanderesse et subsidiairement en rejet de sa demande en justic e ». [ 2 ] The appellant filed notices of appeal against that judgment. [ 3 ] In turn, respondents, by their respective motions, ask the Court to dismiss the appeals.
They mainly submit that these latter have no reasonable chance of success. [ 4 ] Considering the stringent standard of review the appellant would face on the merits and the grounds of appeal contained in her notices of appeal, the Court concludes unanimously that they have no reasonable chance to success.
[ 5 ] Thus, it is not necessary to analyze the other reasons alleged by respondents in support of their motions. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT: [ 6 ] GRANTS respondents’ motions to dismiss the appeals, with judicial costs; [ 7 ] DISMISSES the appeals with judicial costs. MARTIN VAUCLAIR, J.C.A. PATRICK HEALY, J.C.A. MICHEL BEAUPRÉ, J.C.A.
Loading document…