2011 QCCQ 16446, 2011 QCCQ 16446

Protection de la jeunesse — 115587 2011 QCCQ 16446 JD 2182 COUR DU QUÉBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC DISTRICT [...] LOCALITY […] « Youth Court » N° : 760-51-000066-110 DATE : September 26, 2011 ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE PRESENCE OF: THE HONOURABLE LINDA DESPOTS ______________________________________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF: X Born: […], 1997 [SOCIAL WORKER 1] , in her capacity of authorized person by the youth protection director of Les Centres jeunesse A; Petitioner -and- A , residing and domiciled at […], City A (Quebec), district A; -and- B , residing and domiciled at […], City A (Quebec), district A; Parents of the youth -and- C , residing and domiciled at […], City B (Quebec), district A; Tutor – Mise en cause -and- LE CURATEUR PUBLIC DU QUÉBEC ; Mis en cause ______________________________________________________________________ JUGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ [ 1 ] The director presents a request to name a tutor for the youth X, born on […], 1997, in [Country A].

The youth was adopted in 2006. Since August 23 rd , 2007, the youth resides outside his family environment and, since November 2007, the youth is in the same foster family. [ 2 ] The youth has all of his needs responded by the foster family and evolves positively. He has made numerous progress such as his language skills have greatly improved, also his reading and writing improved and, last year, he received the «Outstanding

Citizenship Award» due to his efforts within the community. He is no more aggressive towards others. [ 3 ] On a February 1 st , 2010, the youth Chamber division ordered that the child remains of the care of a foster family until his age of majority, that all parental attributes be withdrawn and that contact between the youth and his parents be at his request. [ 4 ] The last contact between the youth and his parents was held on August 8th, 2009. Through the years, the parents failed to develop and maintain a significant bond with there adopted the youth.

They also failed to significantly contribute to the youth's welfare. [ 5 ] The youth developed a significant bond with the foster family he is with since November 2007 and expressed the desire to have them as tutor. [ 6 ] The parents are not with in happy hart with the idea that this family could be the tutor of their son. Although, they want to respect the desire of the child. [ 7 ] The Court is convinced that it is of the interest of the youth to grant the motion and to name Mrs. C as the tutor of the youth. [ 8 ] The Court: [ 9 ] GRANTS the motion; [ 10 ] DEFERES the tutorship of the youth X to Mrs.

C; [ 11 ] ENTRUSTS the youth to her tutor Mrs. C; [ 12 ] THE WHOLE without costs. __________________________________ LINDA DESPOTS, J.C.Q. Youth Court Me Caterine Caron Procureure du directeur Date d’audience : 26 septembre 2011