2014 QCCQ 14079, 2014 QCCQ 14079

Protection de la jeunesse — 142127 2014 QCCQ 14079 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division No: 610-41-000635-144 DATE: May 12, 2014 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE JOSÉE BÉLANGER J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X , born on […], 2012 SOCIAL WORKER 1 , Youth Protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection exercising her profession at the Centre Jeunesse A, having a place of business at […] in City A, district A (Quebec) […] Applicant A , residing and domiciled at […], City B, district A (Quebec) […] Mother and B , residing and domiciled at […], City B, district A (Quebec) […] Father ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified.

Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 Y.P.A.). [ 1 ] After the filing of a motion asking the Court to declare the security and development of X, born on […], 2012 compromised pursuant to

section 38

c) of the Youth Protection Act . The parties submitted to this Court a draft agreement on measures to put an end to this situation. [ 2 ] The parents are present and represented by their lawyer. The youth is absent but represented by a lawyer. [ 3 ] The consent of the parties is given in free and enlightened manner. This is verified by the Court with the parties. [ 4 ] In the draft agreement filed on D-6 they acknowledge that facts that endanger the security and development of the youth and the draft details those facts.

The draft agreement enumerates all the measures proposed to put an end to the situation in which the security and development of the youth are compromised. [ 5 ] The Court is of the opinion that these measures are likely to put an end to the situation and respect the rights of the youth. For these reasons the Court: [ 6 ] Declares that the security and development of X, born on […], 2012 are compromised pursuant

section 38

c) of the Youth Protection Act ; [ 7 ] Ratifies the draft agreement filed on D-6 and signed by the parties on March 20, 2014; [ 8 ] Orders the implementation of the measures mentioned in that draft agreement; [ 9 ] Entrusts the situation of X to the Director of Youth Protection for the execution of the present judgment. __________________________________ Josée Bélanger, J.C.Q.

Me Julie Lemire, attorney for the Director of Youth Protection Me Sébastien Lebel, attorney for the child Me Daniel Ouellette, attorney for the parents Date of hearing: March 20, 2014