2011 QCCQ 18943, 2011 QCCQ 18943
Opinion
Protection de la jeunesse — 117735 2011 QCCQ 18943 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division N os : 640-41-001240-099, 640-41-001246-096, 640-41-001247-094 DATE: December 14, 2011 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF : X, born on […], 2003 Y, born on […], 2003 Z, born on […], 2000 MRS [SOCIAL WORKER 1], youth protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection A […]., Quebec, district A Petitioner and MRS A, residing and domiciled in Town A, Quebec, district A Mother and MR B, residing and domiciled in Town A, Quebec, district A Father ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT (Section 95 (par. 1), 76.3 and 76.4 Y.P.A. , chap.
P-34.1 R.S.Q. ) ______________________________________________________________________ [ 1 ] Mrs [Social Worker 1], delegate duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection A, asks the Court to review the decisions rendered by Honourable Judge Louis Grégoire on July 16, 2010 concerning the situation of X (8 years old), Y (8 years old) and Z (11 years old). She asks that the children be placed in a foster family for different duration. [ 2 ] At the hearing in Town B on November 24, 2011, the mother is present, represented by Me Clara Egervari. The father is present and not represented.
Me Jean-Claude Latraverse represents the children and Me Alexandre Cimon the petitioner. [ 3 ] According to Sections 76.3 and 76.4 of the Youth Protection Act , the parties produce a draft agreement, and following the comments of the children's lawyer, the Court concludes that the measures agreed upon are in the children's best interest and in the respect of their rights. [ 4 ] FOR THESE MOTIVES, THE COURT : [ 5 ] GRANTS the petitions; [ 6 ] DECLARES that the security and development of X, Y and Z are still in danger; [ 7 ] ACKNOWLEDGES the agreement filed as exhibit D-3 and annexed to the present judgment; [ 8 ] ORDERS the implementation of the measures applicable agreed upon by the parties and listed in paragraph 3 of the agreement; [ 9 ] ENTRUSTS the children's situation to the Director of Youth Protection for the purpose of executing the measures agreed upon. __________________________________ DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q.
Me Alexandre Cimon, attorney for the petitioner Me Clara Egervari, attorney for the mother Me Jean-Claude Latraverse, attorney for the children Date of hearing: November 24, 2011
Loading document…