2016 QCCA 927, 2016 QCCA 927
Opinion
Droit de la famille — 161288 2016 QCCA 927 COURT OF APPEAL CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC REGISTRY OF MONTREAL No: 500-09-026026-161 (760-12-024340-154) MINUTES OF THE HEARING DATE: May 30, 2016 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE nicole duval hesler , C.J.Q. mark schrager , J.A. robert m. mainville , J.A. APPLICANT L. M. Mr. CALE WRIGHT (Stagiaire en droit pour Me Farzad Bigdeli) RESPONDENT COUNSEL K. K. Mtre ELISABETH MAILLET (Toulouse Groulx Avocats) DESCRIPTION : Application for leave to appeal from a judgment rendered on March 24, 2016 by the Honourable Justice Karen Kear-Jodoin of the Superior Court, District of Beauharnois (Article 31 C.C.P .) Clerk: Robert Osadchuck Courtroom: Pierre-Basile-Mignault
HEARING 12:15 Commencement of the hearing. Identification of counsel. 12:15 Submissions by Mr. Wright Amendment by Mr. Wright to correct the date of the judgment of first instance on his motion for leave to appeal: March 24, 2016 instead of March 17, 2016. The motion for leave to appeal is under
article 31 C.C.P . and not
article 363 C.C.P. 12 :40 Recess. 12 :45 Resumption of the hearing. 12 :45 Submissions by Mr. Wright. 12 :47 Submissions by Mtre Maillet. 12 :48 By the Court: judgment – see page 3. 12:49 Conclusion of the hearing. Robert Osadchuck Clerk BY THE COURT JUDGMENT [ 1 ] The judgment which the Petitioner seeks to appeal is clearly a management decision. The standard in appeal is whether such a decision is unreasonable, which is clearly not the case. [ 2 ] The motion is therefore dismissed, without costs in view of the nature of the file. NICOLE DUVAL HESLER, C.J.Q. MARK SCHRAGER, J.A. ROBERT M. MAINVILLE, J.A.
Loading document…