2020 QCCA 1154, 2020 QCCA 1154
Opinion
Hrabovskyy c. University of Montreal 2020 QCCA 1154 COURT OF APPEAL CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC REGISTRY OF MONTREAL No: 500-09-029025-202 ( 500-17-106731-196 ) MINUTES OF HEARING DATE: September 14, 2020 THE HONOURABLE MARTIN VAUCLAIR, J.A. APPELLANT Volodymyr Hrabovskyy Unrepresented By videoconference RESPONDENTS COUNSEL University of Montreal france houle alexandre chabot steve mcinnes guy breton vincent beauséjour louise hélène richard frédérik asselin francis gingras joanie martineau jérome del castillo Mtre Martin Côté ( Robinson Sheppard Shapiro ) By videoconference DESCRIPTION: Motion for directives (Art. 369 C.p.c. ) . Clerk at the hearing : Mélanie Camiré Courtroom: RC-18
HEARING 9:30 Commencement of the hearing. Identification of counsel. Preliminary remarks on the necessity for a motion for leave to appeal. Comments by the Judge inviting Mr Hrabovsky to seek counsel. Submissions by Mr Hrabovsky on the necessity for a motion for leave to appeal. 9:31 Submissions by Mtre Côté. 9:32 Reply by Mr. Hrabovsky. 9:33 Comments by the Judge. 9:35 BY THE JUDGE: Judgment – see page 3. 9:37 Conclusion of the hearing. Mélanie Camiré, Clerk at the hearing JUDGMENT [ 1 ] The proposed appeal requires an application for leave pursuant to
article 30 C.C.P. Thus, in my opinion, no appeal has yet been perfected. Further, an application pursuant to
article 369 C.C.P. must be presented to the chief justice. [ 2 ] THEREFORE, the motion for directives IS DISMISSED , with legal costs in favour of the respondents . MARTIN VAUCLAIR, J.A.
Loading document…