2016 QCCQ 10529, 2016 QCCQ 10529

Protection de la jeunesse — 164346 2016 QCCQ 10529 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division No: 610-41-000559-120 610-41-000560-128 DATE: July 4, 2016 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE JOSÉE BÉLANGER J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X , born on [...], 2009 Y , born on [...], 2011 [SOCIAL WORKER 1] , duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection working at Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux A, having a place of business at [...] in Town A, district A (Quebec) [...] Applicant and A , residing and domiciled at [...] in Town B, district A (Quebec) [...] Mother and B , residing and domiciled at [...] in Town C, district A (Quebec) [...] Father ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified.

Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 Y.P.A.). [ 1 ] The applicant asks the Court to review and extend a decision rendered by this Court on February 16, 2016, concerning each child. The parents are present and represented. As for the children they are absent but represented. The parties do not challenge the motion. [ 2 ] The parties acknowledge the facts that still endanger the security or development of both children and submit to the Court a draft agreement for each of them that details those facts.

They propose as well some measures in order to put an end to that situation that compromises their children’s situation. [ 3 ] The consent of the parties was given in a free and enlightened manner and the Court verified with them the validity of their consent. [ 4 ] The Court is of the opinion that these measures are likely to put an end to the situation that still compromises the children’s situation.

For these reasons the Court: [ 5 ] maintains that the security or development of X, born on [...], 2009 and Y, born on [...], 2011, are still compromised according to the Youth Protection Act; [ 6 ] Ratifies the measures enumerated in the draft agreements filed on D-8 for each child; [ 7 ] Orders the implementation of the said measures; [ 8 ] Entrusts the situation of X and Y to the Director of Youth Protection for the execution of this judgment. __________________________________ Josée Bélanger, J.C.Q.

Me Julie Lemire, attorney for the petitioner Me Peggy Warolin, attorney for the child Me Sébastien Lebel, attorney for the mother Me Daniel Ouellette, attorney for the father Date of hearing: June 8, 2016