2023 QCCQ 9038, 2023 QCCQ 9038
Opinion
Protection de la jeunesse — 235823 2023 QCCQ 9038 COURT OF QUÉBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division No: 145-51-000067-237 DATE: November 13, 2023 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE JANICK POIRIER, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ THE DIRECTOR OF YOUTH PROTECTION Applicant -and- X born on [...], 2010 Child -and- A B Parents -and- C Proposed Tutor -and- LE CURATEUR PUBLIC DU QUÉBEC Implicated party ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ON AN APPLICATION TO APPOINT A TUTOR (Section 70.1 Youth Protection Act) ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified.
Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 9.2, 9.3 and 135 Y.P.A.). [ 1 ] The director of youth protection (DYP) asks the Court to appoint a tutor to the child, namely one of her foster parents, Mr C. [ 2 ] The mother does not attend the hearing therefore the Court is not aware of her position. The father agrees with the application, and so does the child. [ 3 ] The DYP has been involved in the child’s life for many years, because of the parents’ personal issues.
In 2014, the child is entrusted to her current foster family. [ 4 ] On October 3, 2017, the Court orders that the child remain entrusted to the foster family of Mr Clement and his spouse until she reaches her age of majority. [ 5 ] The parents are not involved in the child’s life. [ 6 ] Mr C and his spouse take good care of the child. The latter has developed a close bond with them. [ 7 ] Mr C understands what tutorship means and he is willing to take upon that responsibility.
He can manage contact with the parents if need be. [ 8 ] Entrusted to her tutor, the child will not be in need of protection anymore. [ 9 ] The evidence convinces the Court that the application is well founded. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT: [ 10 ] GRANTS the application; [ 11 ] APPOINTS Mr C as a tutor for the child X; [ 12 ] ENTRUSTS the child to her tutor; [ 13 ] ORDERS that the parties concerned by this judgment comply with it;
[ 14 ] THE WHOLE without costs. __________________________________ JANICK POIRIER, J.C.Q. Me Mylène Pelletier-Rivet for the applicant Me Jules Grenier for the child Ms A Mother (absent) Mr B Father Mr C Proposed tutor Le Curateur public du Québec Implicated party (absent) Date of hearing: November 9, 2023
Loading document…