2014 QCCQ 15195, 2014 QCCQ 15195

Protection de la jeunesse — 142984 2014 QCCQ 15195 COURT OF QUÉBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division No.: 640-41-001664-132 DATE: July 17, 2014 ______________________________________________________________________ PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X, born on […], 2013 MRS SOCIAL WORKER 1, youth protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection A, A town, Quebec, District A Applicant and MRS A, unknown address Mother and MR B, residing and domiciled in A town, Quebec, District A Father ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT (section 95 YPA, CQLR c.

P-34.1 ) ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified. Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 YPA). [ 1 ] The Director of Youth Protection of the Cree Board of Health and Social Services A asks the Court to review the last judgment rendered on December 20, 2013 by the Honourable Lucille Chabot, J.C.Q., concerning the situation of Y, 8 months old.

The applicant, Mrs SOCIAL WORKER 1, asks for the prolongation of the baby's placement in a foster family for another period of six months. [ 2 ] At the hearing, the father is present, assisted by Me Myriam Gaudreault. Me Clara Egervari acts for the child and Me Suzanne Arpin for the applicant. The mother is absent and the parties agree to proceed without her.

She is not involved in the baby's life. [ 3 ] The father admits all the allegations and agrees with the measures. [ 4 ] Y lives in the foster family of Mr C and Mrs D since the last judgment and he is well taken care of. [ 5 ] In February 2014, the mother indicated that she was thinking of putting Y for adoption. Since, she did not collaborate and has not contacted the Director of Youth Protection. The only and last visit of the mother with the baby was on February 18. The social worker is unable to reach her since. [ 6 ] The father is involved in Y's life and has a good relationship with the foster parents.

He signed general adoption consent on March 31, 2014. He also admitted in April that the he has been using drugs. [ 7 ] The father acknowledges that it is in the best interest of the child to remain in the foster family and that a life project be prepared.

CONSEQUENTLY, THE COURT: [ 8 ] GRANTS the petition; [ 9 ] DECLARES that the security and development of Y are still in danger; [ 10 ] ORDERS the placement of Y in the foster family of Mr C and Mrs D for another period of six months; [ 11 ] ORDERS the Director of Youth Protection to supervise the visit rights and access of the parents with the child; [ 12 ] ORDERS the Director of Youth Protection to provide aid, counselling and assistance to the child and his parents for a period of six months;

[ 13 ] ORDERS any police officer to collaborate in the execution of the Court orders; [ 14 ] ENTRUSTS the child's situation to the Director of Youth Protection for the purpose of executing this judgment. __________________________________ DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. Me Suzanne Arpin Attorney for the applicant Me Myriam Gaudreault Attorney for the father Me Clara Egervari Attorney for the child Date of hearing: May 28, 2014