2022 QCCQ 14336, 2022 QCCQ 14336

Protection de la jeunesse — 229105 2022 QCCQ 14336 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF […] TOWN OF […] Youth Division No: 610-41-000637-140 DATE: March 25, 2022 (written judgment rendered on April 19, 2022) ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE PEGGY WAROLIN J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X , born on […], 2010 [Social Worker 1], in her quality of authorized person by the Director of Youth Protection of the Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux A Applicant and A Mother and B Father ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT (Section 95 of the Youth Protection Act ) ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified.

Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 Y.P.A.). [ 1 ] The Director of Youth Protection (DYP) asks the Court to review and prolong a decision rendered on June 2, 2015, regarding the child X, born on […], 2010. At that date the Court declared the security and development still endangered and entrusted the child to the foster family of Ms. C until her majority. [ 2 ] The DYP submits that the situation does not allow to maintain the child under the care of Ms.

C nor to return the child to her parents and asks that the child be placed with the foster family of D, for a period of 6 months. Position of the Parties [ 3 ] The mother is present, but not represented. She recognizes that the security and development of her child are still endangered and she agrees with the measures. [ 4 ] The father is present, but not represented. He recognizes that the security and development of his child are still endangered and he agrees with the measures. [ 5 ] The child is absent but represented by Me Samuel Richard-Guertin.

She recognizes that her security and development are still endangered and she agrees with the measures. Facts and Analysis [ 6 ] Considering the absence of contestation, the parties file a draft agreement in which they list the facts that justify maintaining the declaration of endangerment. [ 7 ] This draft agreement also contains the measures they agree upon. The parents confirmed that they understood the draft agreement, they agree with and they signed it freely. [ 8 ] This agreement fulfill the best interest of the child.

The Court underlined the great improvements of the parents and encouraged them to continue on this way. FOR THOSE REASONS, THE COURT: [ 9 ] GRANTS the application; [ 10 ] DECLARES that the security and development of the child X, born on […], 2010, are still endangered;

[ 11 ] RATIFIES the draft agreement; [ 12 ] ORDERS the implementation of the measures mentioned in the draft agreement signed by the parties on March 25, 2022; [ 13 ] ORDERS the parties to comply with the measures; [ 14 ] ORDERS the clerk of the Court of Quebec, Youth Division, to attach to this judgment a copy of the draft agreement to form an integrant part hereof, and to attach such copy of the judgment to be subsequently delivered; [ 15 ] ENTRUSTS the situation of the child X , to the Director of Youth Protection for the execution of the present decision. __________________________________ PEGGY WAROLIN , J.C.Q.

Me Marie-Michelle Grenier, attorney for the Director of Youth Protection Me Samuel Richard-Guertin, attorney for the child Date of hearing: March 25, 2022