R. v. Lint, 2011 NBCA 3
Opinion
COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW BRUNSWICK 83-10-CA HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN APPELLANT SA MAJESTÉ LA REINE APPELANTE - and - - et - TANYA MARIE LINT RESPONDENT TANYA MARIE LINT INTIMÉE R. v. Lint, 2011 NBCA 3 R. c.
Lint, 2011 NBCA 3 CORAM: The Honourable Justice Robertson The Honourable Justice Bell The Honourable Justice Quigg CORAM : L’honorable juge Robertson L’honorable juge Bell L’honorable juge Quigg Appeal from a decision of the Court of Queen's Bench: May 19, 2010 Appel d’une décision de la Cour du Banc de la Reine : Le 19 mai 2010 History of Case: Historique de la cause : Decision under appeal: Unreported Décision frappée d’appel : Inédite Preliminary or incidental proceedings: N/A Procédures préliminaires ou accessoires : S.O.
Appeal heard : January 11, 2011 Appel entendu : Le 11 janvier 2011 Judgment rendered: January 11, 2011 Jugement rendu : Le 11 janvier 2011
Counsel at hearing: For the appellant: Lindsay J. Schriver For the respondent: Sylvain Pelletier Avocats à l’audience : Pour l’appelante : Lindsay J. Schriver Pour l’intimée : Sylvain Pelletier THE COURT The application for leave to appeal sentence is dismissed. LA COUR La demande d’autorisation d’interjeter appel est rejetée. The following is the judgment delivered by THE COURT (Orally) [ 1 ] The Crown appeals on the basis that the sentence imposed by the trial judge is the product of either an error of law, an error in principle or is clearly unreasonable.
Having regard to the facts of this case, which do not correspond with the facts in cases relied upon by the Crown ( R. v. Steeves , 2005 NBCA 85 , 288 N.B.R. (2d) 1 and R. v. Chaulk , 2005 NBCA 86 , 287 N.B.R. (2d) 375), the comprehensive reasons for judgment and the pertinent jurisprudence of this Court, the application for leave to appeal sentence is dismissed. _____________________________ J.T. ROBERTSON, J.A. _____________________________ B. RICHARD BELL, J.A. _____________________________ KATHLEEN A. QUIGG, J.A.
Loading document…