2012 QCCQ 16621, 2012 QCCQ 16621
Opinion
Protection de la jeunesse — 125639 2012 QCCQ 16621 QUEBEC COURT CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] « Youth Division » N° : 145-41-000345-105 DATE : September 6, 2012 ______________________________________________________________________ THE HOROURABLE HERMINA POPESCU J.C.Q.
PRESIDING ______________________________________________________________________ DIRECTOR OF YOUTH PROTECTION Petitioner and X (born on [...], 1995) Child et A Mother B Father ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ [ 1 ] New facts arisen since this Court's order rendered on February 15, 2012 justify the revision of this order. [ 2 ] The child was returned to her mother on March 30, 2012. Even if she was doing well for the first couple of months, her old habits came back soon afterwards.
She started lying, did not respect her curfew and even wouldn't come home. Starting May 28, 2012, she was returned to a rehabilitation center. Following an improvement in her behaviour (she was capable of controlling her anger and followed through with the recommendations), she was finally returned to her mother on July 5, 2012. [ 3 ] The child did not go home all week of July 9, 2012 and did not contact at all her mother.
She was with a 37 years old man, known to police authorities for sexual assault on a child and also as a drug dealer and user. [ 4 ] Even if the child understands the rules and expectations of her returning home, she does not respect her mother's authority (leaving home without telling where she is going, staying out late and even sometimes does not come home for days). [ 5 ] Her mother is overwhelmed and can not cope anymore with the child's behaviour. [ 6 ] The child is now 17 years old and lacking many of the social and personal skills required.
She has many unresolved emotional issues and does not understand that this influences her behaviour and puts her at risk. She needs a stable and secure environment that unfortunately only the rehabilitation center and a foster family can offer.
THEREFORE THE COURT : [ 7 ] DECLARES that the security and development the development of X are still considered to be in danger; [ 8 ] ORDERS that the child be entrusted to a rehabilitation center designated by the Director of Youth Protection until October 15, 2012 and after that she should be entrusted to a foster family designated by the Director of Youth Protection, until [...], 2013 (age of majority) ; [ 9 ] RECOMMENDS that the child seeks help for her addiction from Addictions Services; [ 10 ] RECOMMENDS that the child benefits from psychological services and follow-up for as long as deemed necessary; [ 11 ] ORDERS that the child and her parents receive family services through an External Educator; [ 12 ] ORDERS that the child and her parents actively participate in the application of the measures suggested by the director of Youth Protection;
[ 13 ] ORDERS that a person working for an establishment provide aid, counsel and assistance to the child an her parents until [...], 2013 ; [ 14 ] ENTRUSTS the situation of the child to the Director of Youth Protection of the Centre Jeunesse A for the carrying out of the present measures. _______________________ Hermina Popescu J.C.Q. Me Louyse-Andrée Lemieux PARADIS, SMITH & LEMIEUX Attorney for the Petitioner Me Andrée Rioux Attorney for the child Date of hearing : September 6, 2012 Filed on : September 17, 2012
Loading document…