2016 QCCQ 13147, 2016 QCCQ 13147
Opinion
Protection de la jeunesse — 165754 2016 QCCQ 13147 COURT OF QUÉBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division No.: 615-41-002103-157 DATE: September 13, 2016 ______________________________________________________________________ PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X, born on [...], 2002 MRS [SOCIAL WORKER 1], youth protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection of the Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux A, having a place of business at [...] in Town A, District A, [...] Applicant and MRS A, residing and domiciled at [...] in Town A, District A, [...] Mother and MR B, residing and domiciled at [...] in Town B, District A, [...] Father ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT (Section 95 (1, 2 and 3) YPA, RSQ c.
P-34.1 ) ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified.
Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 YPA). [ 1 ] Mrs [Social Worker 1], delegate of the Director of Youth Protection A, asks the Court to review a decision rendered on November 24, 2015 concerning the youth X, born on [...], 2002. [ 2 ] The applicant asks that the adolescent be placed in the foster family of Mrs C and Mr D for a period of 12 months. [ 3 ] At the hearing, the adolescent and his mother are present, assisted by Me Isabelle Charron (adolescent) and Me Claude Cossette (mother). Me Marie-Pier Lortie assists the applicant.
The father is absent. [ 4 ] The parties acknowledge their difficulties and admit that the security and development of the youth are still in danger. [ 5 ] The parties produce a draft agreement according to section 95 (3) of the Youth Protection Act in which they acknowledge all the allegations and agree with the recommendations included in the report in view of a revision made by the social worker.
The reports in English and French in view of a revision are filed. [ 6 ] Considering the evidence, [ 7 ] Considering that the parties agree with the agreement, the Court concluded that the measures agreed upon are in the youth's best interest and respect his rights.
FOR THERE REASONS, THE COURT: [ 8 ] GRANTS the motion; [ 9 ] DECLARES that the security and development of X are still in danger; [ 10 ] RATIFIES the draft agreement signed on September 12, 2016 and ORDERS the parties to respect the measures proposed; [ 11 ] ORDERS the clerk of the Court of Québec, Youth Division, to annex to this judgment a copy of the draft agreement to form an integral part hereof and to annex such copy to any copy of the judgment to be subsequently delivered; [ 12 ] ENTRUST the situation of the youth to the Director of Youth Protection for the implementation of the measures ordered.
__________________________________ DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. Me Marie-Pier Lortie Attorney for the applicant Me Claude Cossette Attorney for the mother Me Isabelle Charron Attorney for the youth Date of hearing: September 12, 2016
Loading document…