2014 QCCQ 14230, 2014 QCCQ 14230

Protection de la jeunesse — 142325 2014 QCCQ 14230 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division No: 640-41-001571-139 DATE: May 27, 2014 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE JEAN-PIERRE GERVAIS, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ [SOCIAL WORKER 1], youth protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection of the district A, C.Y.P.C., working in city A APPLICANT and X, residing and domiciled in city A, Québec, district B CHILD and A, residing and domiciled in city A, Québec, district B MOTHER and B, residing and domiciled in city A, Québec, district B FATHER ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified.

Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 Y.P.A.). [ 1 ] The applicant is addressing the Court, asking for the review of a decision rendered on November 11, 2013 by the Honourable Juanita Westmoreland-Traoré, J.C.Q, maintaining the status of endangerment for X, born […], 2012. [ 2 ] It appears that the situation has now changed in such a way that it is no longer necessary to apply measures of protection. [ 3 ] It is to be noted that the grandparents adopted by way of traditional adoption the concerned child, whom is now 1½ year old.

The fact that these people are currently struggling with some difficulties has justified, until recently, the involvement of the Youth Protection in this family. [ 4 ] Meanwhile, the biological mother of the child, who is also the grandparent's daughter, is now capable of taking care of her own child and providing for X’s needs. [ 5 ] The Director of Youth Protection, in agreement with the above-mentioned fact, believes that the security and development of the child are no longer in danger.

Therefore, the Court and Youth Protection's services are rendered unnecessary. [ 6 ] The proof being satisfactory, it is advisable to put an end to this intervention. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT: [ 7 ] GRANTS the motion; [ 8 ] REVISES the decision rendered on November 22, 2013; [ 9 ] DECLARES that the security and development of X, born on […], 2012, are no longer in danger. __________________________________ Jean-Pierre Gervais, J.C.Q. M e Camille Provencher Attorney for the applicant

M e Cassandra Neptune Attorney for the child M e Angèle Tommasel Attorney for the parents Date of hearing: April 23 rd , 2014