2013 QCCQ 7678, 2013 QCCQ 7678

Protection de la jeunesse — 132756 2013 QCCQ 7678 COURT OF QUÉBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division Nos.: 640-41-001082-087 and 640-41-001083-085 DATE: June 20, 2013 ______________________________________________________________________ PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X, born on [...], 2007 Y, born on [...], 2004 [SOCIAL WORKER 1], youth protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection A, Quebec, District A Applicant and A, unknown address in City A, Quebec, District B Mother and B, residing and domiciled in City B, Quebec, District A Father ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT (

section 95 ( par. 1) , Youth Protection Act , R.S.Q. , c. P-34.1) ______________________________________________________________________ [ 1 ] The Court is seized with two petitions in revision of the last Court judgments rendered on May 24, 2011 concerning X and Y. Even if those children are placed until their majority in foster families, the social worker requires that both children be entrusted with an aunt for six months. Y would be entrusted to C and X to D. [ 2 ] At the hearing, Mtre. Daniel Ouellette represents the children and Mtre. Alexandre Cimon the applicant.

The parents are absent, even if served. [ 3 ] The evidence reveals that the children had to be remove from the foster family where they both resided. Y disclosed that they were physically abused by the foster parents. [ 4 ] Since April 2, the children refused to go back in their foster family. They reported those incidents to extended family members last March 28, 2013. Investigation is not completed yet. [ 5 ] Since, the children did not return in the foster family and they lived with relatives. [ 6 ] The parents are not involved in the children's life.

The mother visits them irregularly. [ 7 ] The aunts are now available to assume them. The children want to come back in City C.

Even if they are separated, they agree with the recommendations of the social worker. [ 8 ] Considering the evidence and the children's agreement, [ 9 ] FOR THESE MOTIVES, THE COURT: [ 10 ] GRANTS the petitions; [ 11 ] DECLARES that the security and development of X and Y are still in danger; [ 12 ] ENTRUSTS Y to Mrs C and X to Mrs D for a period of six months, and after, ENTRUSTS them to foster families until their majority; [ 13 ] WITHDRAWS the parental authority and AUTHORIZES the Director of Youth Protection to sign all medical, school and social authorizations required for the children;

[ 14 ] ORDERS the Director of Youth Protection to supervise the visits and communications between the children and their parents; [ 15 ] ORDERS the Director of Youth Protection to provide aid, counselling and assistance to the children and their parents until their majority; [ 16 ] ORDERS any police officer to collaborate in the execution of the judgment; [ 17 ] ENTRUSTS the children's situation to the Director of Youth Protection for the purpose of executing this judgment. __________________________________ DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. Mtre. Alexandre Cimon, attorney for the applicant Mtre. Daniel Ouellette, attorney for the children Date of hearing: May 27, 2013