2015 QCCQ 9434, 2015 QCCQ 9434

Protection de la jeunesse — 151170 2015 QCCQ 9434 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF […] TOWN OF […] Youth Division No: 565-41-000025-128 565-41-000026-126 565-41-000027-124 565-41-000028-122 565-41-000029-120 DATE: January 20 th , 2015 ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE PRESENCE OF: THE HONOURABLE MICHEL SÉGUIN, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ In the case of : X Born on […], 2009 Y Born on […], 1998 Z Born on […], 2002 A Born on […], 2004 B Born on […], 2012 ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ [ 1 ] The Court is seized of a petition under

section 95 of the Youth Protection Act to review in part and extend the decision rendered on the 20 th of March 2013 by the undersigned judge. [ 2 ] At the beginning of the hearing, the attorney for the Director of the Youth Protection stated that this petition is based on the following motives: - The parents are still having problems with there addictions, violence and parenting skills; - The parents haven’t obtain professional services for their problems; - It is in the best interest of the children to pursue his placement in order to actualise a life project; [ 3 ] The report of Ms. [Social Worker 1] of the D.Y.P and its appendix were filed under D-1 and D-2 with the consents of the attorneys and she testified on recent developments in the situation. [ 4 ] Madame [Social Worker 1] informed the Court that the parents are now more collaborating particularly when they are visiting the children and this in the best interest of the said children.

She also added the D.Y.P. will promote the relation of the children with their culture. [ 5 ] It is important that the parents take rapidly the necessary steps to solve their problems of alcohol addictions, violence and lacks of parental skills as it appears in the documents produced if they want a reunion of the family before it’s to late and to do so they will have to engage in services and collaborate with all the professionals involved. [ 6 ] Given the evidence and the consents of all the parties with the social practitioner’s recommendations ;

[ 7 ] THEREFORE THE COURT : [ 8 ] GRANTS the petition; [ 9 ] DECLARES that the security and the development of the children are still compromise; [ 10 ] REVISES AND EXTENDS the decision rendered on the 20 th of March 2013 by the undersigned Judge; [ 11 ] ORDERS that the child Y be entrusted to Mrs C until he reaches 18 years of age; [ 12 ] ORDERS that the children Z, A, B and X be entrusted to foster care for a period of one year and during this time a permanent life plan will be put in place; [ 13 ] ORDERS that the visits between the parents and the children be done under supervision and according to the modalities established by [Center A].

In case of a disagreement between the parties on the modalities, the Court will have to be seized of the situation; [ 14 ] RECOMMENDS that the parents obtain professional services for addiction, violence and parenting skills; [ 15 ] ORDERS an interdiction of contacts between the parents and the foster families unless authorized by the [Center A]; [ 16 ] ORDERS that a person authorised by the Director of Youth Protection provides aid, counsel and assistance to the children and the family for the duration of the present order; [ 17 ] ENTRUSTS the situation of the children to the Director of Youth Protection who shall then see that the measures are carried out. __________________________________ MICHEL SÉGUIN, J.C.Q.

M e Danielle Pharand Attorney of the D.Y.P. M e Chloé Vendette Attorney of the children M e André Chagnon Attorney of the mother M e Stéphanie Lelièvre Attorney of the father Date of hearing : January 20 th 2015 /hb