2020 QCCQ 15087, 2020 QCCQ 15087
Opinion
Protection de la jeunesse — 2010096 2020 QCCQ 15087 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division No: 610-41-000676-155 DATE: December 15, 2020 (written judgment rendered on January 19, 2021) ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE PEGGY WAROLIN J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X , born on [...], 2006 [SOCIAL WORKER 1], in her quality of authorized person by the Director of Youth Protection of the Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux A, having a place of business at [...] Applicant and A, residing and domiciled at [...] Mother and B , residing and domiciled at [...] Father ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT (Section 95 of the Youth Protection Act ) ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified.
Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 Y.P.A.). [ 1 ] The Director of Youth Protection (DYP) asks the Court to review and extend a decision rendered on April 22, 2020, regarding the adolescent X, born on [...], 2006. At that date the Court declared the security and development still endangered and entrusted the adolescent to a foster family for a period of eight months. [ 2 ] The DYP submits that the adolescent is entrusted to her father. Position of the Parties [ 3 ] Despite being dully served, the mother is absent and not represented.
She participated to the revision meeting by phone and confirmed to agree with the recommendations. She also sends an e-mail confirming her consent. She is presently in [Province A] participating to a therapy for her addiction issues and due to Public Health restrictions, she is not able to attend the hearing. [ 4 ] The father is present, but not represented. He recognizes that the security and development of his child are still endangered and he agrees with the measures. [ 5 ] The youth is present and represented by Me Dionne-Marcotte.
She recognizes that her security and development are still endangered and she agrees with the measures. [ 6 ] The DYP files the draft agreement signed by the parties. After verifying that the consent was given freely, the Court declares to agree with the measures and accepts to ratify it.
FOR THOSE REASONS, THE COURT: [ 7 ] GRANTS the application; [ 8 ] DECLARES that the security and development of the adolescent X, born on [...], 2006, are still endangered; [ 9 ] RATIFIES the draft agreement; [ 10 ] ORDERS the implementation of the measures mentioned in the draft agreement signed by the parties on December 15, 2020; [ 11 ] ORDERS the parties to comply with the measures; [ 12 ] ORDERS the clerk of the Court of Quebec, Youth Division, to attach to this judgment a copy of the draft agreement to form an integrant part hereof, and to attach such copy of the judgment to be subsequently delivered;
[ 13 ] ENTRUSTS the situation of the youth X , to the Director of Youth Protection for the execution of this order. __________________________________ PEGGY WAROLIN , J.C.Q. Me Flore Tardif, attorney for the Director of Youth Protection Me Catherine Dionne-Marcotte, attorney for the youth Date of hearing: December 15, 2020 [NDLE : Cette entente n'est pas disponible]
Loading document…