2019 QCCA 1929, 2019 QCCA 1929
Opinion
Héon c. R. 2019 QCCA 1929 COURT OF APPEAL CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC REGISTRY OF MONTREAL No : 500-10-007187-196 ( 500-01-158388-170 ) MINUTES OF HEARING THE PUBLICATION BAN IS STILL IN FORCE ON ANY INFORMATION THAT COULD IDENTIFY THE VICTIMS (s. 486.4 Cr.C .) DATE: November 13, 2019 THE HONOURABLE STEPHEN W. HAMILTON, J.A.
APPLICANT COUNSEL Brandon Héon Mtre MATTHEW SHADLEY ( Shadley Bien-Aimé, s.e.nc. ) for M tre Jordan Trevick RESPONDENT COUNSEL HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Mtre LAURENT-ALEXANDRE DUCLOS- BÉLANGER for m tre Bruno Ménard ( Directeur des poursuites criminelles et pénales ) On appeal from a judgment rendered on September 13th 2019 by the Honourable Mélanie Hébert of the Court of Québec , District of Montréal . DESCRIPTION: Motion for leave to appeal from conviction on grounds that involve questions of fact ( S. 675
(1) a) ii) C.cr . and S.21 et seq. R.C.a.Q.m.c. ) Clerk at the hearing : Elisabeth Lepage Courtroom: RC-18 HEARING 9:41 Commencement of the hearing. Identification of counsel. Mtre Duclos-Bélanger consent to the motion
BY THE JUDGE: Judgment – see page 3. 9:42 Conclusion of the hearing. Elisabeth Lepage, Clerk at the hearing JUDGMENT THE PUBLICATION BAN IS STILL IN FORCE ON ANY INFORMATION THAT COULD IDENTIFY THE VICTIMS (s. 486.4 Cr.C .) [ 1 ] The applicant seeks leave to appeal the convictions entered against him on September 13, 2019 on grounds that involve two questions which he describes as mixed law and fact.
The motion is brought pursuant to paragraph 675(1) a)(ii) of the Criminal Code . [ 2 ] The applicant has previously filed a notice of appeal, dated October 15, 2019, raising the same two questions. [ 3 ] The Respondent agrees that the motion for leave to appeal should be deferred to the Court. THEREFORE, THE UNDERSIGNED: [ 4 ] DEFERS the motion for leave to appeal to the Court. STEPHEN W. HAMILTON, J.A.
Loading document…