2011 QCCQ 17430, 2011 QCCQ 17430
Opinion
Protection de la jeunesse — 116717 2011 QCCQ 17430 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division No: 640-41-001261-103 DATE: October 14, 2011 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE JEAN-PIERRE GERVAIS, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ [INTERVENANTE 1], Youth Protection Worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection A C.Y.P.C., working in city A APPLICANT and X, born on […], 1994 TEENAGER and A MOTHER ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ [ 1 ] The applicant in this case is asking to review the decision rendered by Right Honourable Louis Grégoire, J.C.Q. on July 15, 2010, ordering, among other things, the placement of the teenager in a reception centre for a period not exceeding fourteen months. [ 2 ] At the hearing, both mother and teenager are present and represented by counsel. [ 3 ] After taking position on the allegations of the motion, both also express their agreement to the measure sought by the applicant, which is to continue the placement in a reception centre for another six months. [ 4 ] From the evidence heard and the admissions made, we note that the young girl is presently facing some drug problems and having suicidal ideas.
These consequences are most likely related to deeply upsetting past events. [ 5 ] As a matter of fact, one of the individuals responsible for these events is the current partner of the teenager’s mother and he is still in the immediate vicinity of the youth.
This contributes to the teenager’s situation to be still endangered. [ 6 ] Consequently, the Court considers that the measure proposed by the Director of Youth Protection, to which the parties agree, is appropriate in the circumstances. [ 7 ] FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT: [ 8 ] GRANTS the motion; [ 9 ] DECLARES that the security and development of the teenager continue to be endangered; [ 10 ] ORDERS that X be entrusted to a reception centre for a period ending March 16, 2012, with possible reintegration with the mother if the situation allows it; [ 11 ] ALLOWS X to integrate a treatment centre during her placement, if she expresses the wish to do so; [ 12 ] ORDERS that the youth receive all the medical attention she requires including psychological follow-up; [ 13 ] PROHIBITS contacts between X and Y; [ 14 ] ORDERS all conclusions rendered in the past to remain in force, if not obsoletes;
[ 15 ] ORDERS the police to collaborate in the execution of this order; [ 16 ] ENTRUSTS the teenager’s situation to the Director of Youth Protection for the purpose of executing the court order. __________________________________ JEAN-PIERRE GERVAIS, J.C.Q. Me Robert-André Adam Cain Lamarre Casgrain Wells Lawyers for the applicant Me Sarah Plamondon Lawyer for the teenager Me Angèle Tommasel Lawyer for the mother Date of hearing: September 13, 2011
Loading document…