2015 QCCA 1894, 2015 QCCA 1894

Provost c. Canada (Ministère de la Justice) 2015 QCCA 1894 COUR D'APPEL CANADA PROVINCE DE QUÉBEC GREFFE DE MONTRÉAL No: 500-10-005578-149 (500-36-007048-146) PROCÈS-VERBAL D'AUDIENCE DATE : Le 9 novembre 2015 L’HONORABLE YVES-MARIE MORISSETTE, J.C.A. REQUÉRANT AVOCAT MARCEL RENÉ PROVOST Me Jack Hendler (Jack Y. Hendler) INTIMÉ AVOCATE MINISTÈRE DE LA JUSTICE CANADA Me Claudine Dib (Ministère de la Justice Canada) DESCRIPTION : Requête de l’intimé en modification de conditions de mise en liberté provisoire (Article 20 de la

Loi sur l’extradition )

REQUÉRANTE AVOCATE MINISTÈRE DE LA JUSTICE CANADA Me Claudine Dib (Ministère de la Justice Canada) INTIMÉ AVOCAT MARCEL RENÉ PROVOST Me Jack Hendler (Jack Y. Hendler) DESCRIPTION : Requête pour modification de conditions de mise en liberté de la requérante (Article 20 de la

Loi sur l’extradition ) Greffier d'audience : Shirley Thomas SALLE : RC-18 AUDITION 9 h 35 Ouverture de la séance et identification des procureurs. Échanges de part et d’autre entre le Juge et Me Dib. 9 h 36 Me Hendler présente une requête pour des conditions de mise en liberté à la Cour. 9 h 37 Me Dib conteste la requête présentée par Me Hendler. 9 h 38 Argumentation de Me Dib. 9 h 40 Échanges de part et d’autre entre le Juge et Me Hendler. 9 h 41 Par le Juge : Jugement – Voir page 4. 9 h 41 Fin de l’audience. SHIRLEY THOMAS Greffière d'audience

PAR LE JUGE JUGEMENT [ 1 ] Je suis saisi de deux requêtes pour modifier des conditions de remise en liberté, l’une du ministère de la Justice et l’autre d’un requérant qui conteste une ordonnance d’extradition. [ 2 ] Pour des raisons d’ordre technique admises de part et d’autre (une erreur s’est glissée dans une ordonnance de remise en liberté prononcée le 12 août dernier) et pour des raisons de commodité qui ne sont pas contestée entre les parties, il y a lieu d’apporter quelques modifications à l’ordonnance en question. [ 3 ] POUR CES MOTIFS : [ 4 ] J’ACCUEILLE les deux requêtes; [ 5 ] JE MODIFIE les termes de l’ordonnance de remise en liberté du requérant Marcel René Provost afin qu’elle énonce ce qui suit : 5.1.

Maintain the deposit of $2 000 already made at the Office of the Superior Court by Denise Marchand , a third party; 5.2. Maintain the undertaking already made by Denise Marchand, a third party, in the amount of $5 000 without deposit, in the form of a GIC that becomes due on August 22, 2015 and in the amount of $3 000 without deposit, in the form of a GIC that comes due on July 23, 2017; 5.3. Keep the peace, be of good conduct and be present in Court whenever required; 5.4. Reside at: […], Montréal; 5.5.

Not change his residential address without having obtained the prior authorization of the Court of Appeal or one of its judges; 5.6. Abstain from leaving the Province of Quebec without having obtained the prior authorization of the Court of Appeal or one of its judges; 5.7. Refrain from taking his two passports from the Office of Superior Court and abstain from applying for a new one; 5.8. Not be found in the presence of anyone under the age of 18 years except in the company of at least one adult; 5.9. Be in his residence between 12:00 a .m. and 5 :00 a.m., except for medical emergency or work purposes; 5.10.

Answer any tele phone call made to his residence between 12 :00 a .m. and 5 :00 a.m.; 5.11. Not communicate or attempt to communicate with the victim; 5.12. Report in person, to the RCMP station located at 4225, Dorchester Blvd, Westmount, every Wednesday between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. and sign the register, beginning on August 19, 2015; 5.13.

Abstain from possessing or carrying for any reason whatsoever offensive or restricted weapons, or an imitation thereof, including revolvers, starting guns, pellet guns, firearms, crossbows, prohibited weapons, restricted use weapons, prohibited devices, ammunition or explosive substances, knives (except in a restaurant and for a legitimate purpose); 5.14. Surrender to the Rivière des Prairies Detention Center no later than 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the delivery of the judgment on his motion for leave to appeal in the Supreme Court of Canada.

The petitioner acknowledges having been informed that his failure to do so may result in the petition being dismissed without a hearing. YVES-MARIE MORISSETTE , J.C.A.