2015 QCCQ 6338, 2015 QCCQ 6338
Opinion
Adler c. Expedia Canada Corp. 2015 QCCQ 6338 COURT OF QUEBEC «Small Claims Division» CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL «Civil Division» No: 500-32-137226-132 DATE: July 16, 2015 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE DOMINIQUE GIBBENS, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ Barry ADLER Plaintiff v. Expedia Canada Corp.
Defendant ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ [ 1 ] Barry Adler claims $1,873.95 from Expedia Canada Corp., doing business under the name of Expedia.ca (« Expedia »), following the purchase of a Caribbean cruise. He claims that he found the identical cruise at a lower price shortly after purchasing it and that Expedia should have reimbursed the amount claimed pursuant to its Best Price Guarantee. [ 2 ] Expedia filed a contestation to Mr.
Adler’s claim, but failed to appear at the hearing, despite having been duly convened and called. FACTUAL CONTEXT [ 3 ] On December 17, 2012, Mr. Adler purchased a one-week Caribbean cruise for himself, his wife and three children. He made the purchase online and paid $930.99 USD per person ($849 for the fare and $81.99 for taxes and fees), except for the youngest child, whose fare was free. The total purchase price was $3,805,95 USD. [1] [ 4 ] Later in the day on December 17, 2012, Mr.
Adler saw that the price of the cruise on Expedia.ca had dropped to $483 per person, in addition to taxes and fees. [2] On December 18, he made a claim on the Expedia.ca website for partial reimbursement of his cruise based on Expedia’s Best Price Guarantee. [ 5 ] On December 20, 2012, Mr.
Adler was advised by Expedia that his claim was ineligible to the Best Price Guarantee program because cruises are not covered by said guarantee. [3] The same day, he sent Expedia a letter of demand requesting payment by December 30, 2012 of $1,873.95 (representing what he claims to be the difference between the price paid for the cruise and the lower price advertised on Expedia.ca). [4] ANALYSIS [ 6 ] Even in the absence of Expedia at the hearing, the Court must be satisfied that Mr. Adler has met the burden of proving, on a balance of probabilities, the facts upon which his claim is based. [5] [ 7 ] Mr.
Adler has not established that the cruise he purchased was covered by Expedia’s Best Price Guarantee. [ 8 ] Pursuant to the terms of the guarantee as set out on the Expedia.ca website on December 17, 2012, [6] Expedia undertakes, should a purchaser find a cheaper identical trip within 24 hours of booking, to refund the difference in price and give the passenger a travel coupon for $50.00.
The website states, however, that: “ Expedia.ca’s Best Price Guarantee only applies to Hotel, Car Rental, Package and All-Inclusive Vacation products ” (our emphasis). [7] [ 9 ] On plain reading, the guarantee does not apply to cruises. Mr. Adler purchased a cruise and not a hotel, car rental, package or all-inclusive product. As such, his purchase was not covered by Expedia’s Best Price Guarantee. [ 10 ] Under the circumstances, the Court finds it appropriate not to grant costs in favour of Expedia. FOR THE REASONS, THE COURT: DISMISSES the action; WITHOUT costs.
__________________________________ DOMINIQUE GIBBENS, J.C.Q. Date of hearing: March16, 2015
Loading document…