2016 QCCQ 9906, 2016 QCCQ 9906

Protection de la jeunesse — 164233 2016 QCCQ 9906 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division No: 640-41-001532-123 DATE: July 4 th , 2016 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF : X , born on […], 2001 [SOCIAL WORKER 1], youth protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of youth protection of the A C.Y.P.C., working in City A, District A Applicant and A, presently detained at the Detention Center in Amos, District of Abitibi Mother ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT (

section 95 of the Youth Protection Act , R.S.Q. c. P-34.1) ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified. Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 Y.P.A.).

JL2340 [ 1 ] Mrs [Social Worker 1], delegate duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection of A C.Y.P.C. asks the Court to review the judgment rendered on May 20 th , 2015, by Judge Jean Gravel, J.C.Q., concerning the situation of X, 14 years old. [ 2 ] The last order provided that the child be entrusted to a Reception Center until June 25 th , 2015, followed by a placement in a foster family until May 30 th , 2016.

Now the applicant asks for the prolongation of the placement in the foster family of his maternal grandmother, until his majority. [ 3 ] At the hearing, the child is represented by Me Nicolas Welt, the mother, absent, by Me Angela Tommasel and Me Donald Bourget assists the applicant. [ 4 ] The mother’s lawyer made some admissions and agrees with the measures.

The child also admits the allegations, exception done of paragraph 4.5 and agrees with the measures. [ 5 ] The applicant, Mrs [Social Worker 1], testifies that the grandmother agrees to provide a secure and stable environment to her grandson until he turns 18 years old. Her revision report is filed. [ 6 ] The child behaves very well in the foster family and he is happy to evolve closed the family members.

His behaviour was exemplary until his mother’s sentence last March 2016, when she received a sentence of four years of imprisonment. [ 7 ] Following that event, the child refused to return at school and since he misbehaves. Services of an educator are urgently needed as well as a pediatric psychiatrist follow up. [ 8 ] The child needs the stability and security provided by the foster parents and also needs guidance from an educator to ensure his regular school attendance. CONSEQUENTLY, THE COURT: [ 9 ] GRANTS the petition;

[ 10 ] DECLARES that the security and development of X, born on […], 2001, are still endangered; [ 11 ] ORDERS his placement in a foster family until his majority; [ 12 ] RECOMMANDS his placement in his grandmother foster family of Mrs B; [ 13 ] ORDERS the Director of Youth Protection to provide aid, counsel and assistance to the child and his mother for the duration of the judgment; [ 14 ] ORDERS the Director of Youth Protection to supervise the contact between the child and his mother; [ 15 ] RECOMMANDS that the child beneficiates of the services of an educator for one year; [ 16 ] RECOMMANDS that the child receive and accept all the medical and professional follow ups that his situation requires; [ 17 ] ENTRUSTS the situation of the youth to the Director of Youth Protection of the A C.Y.P.C. for the purpose of executing the measures ordered by the Court. __________________________________ Denyse Leduc, J.C.Q.

Me Nicolas Welt For the children Me Donald Bourget For the applicant Me Angela Tommasel For the mother Date of hearing: May 25, 2016