2011 QCCA 735, 2011 QCCA 735
Opinion
Rothos c. Gassios 2011 QCCA 735 COURT OF APPEAL CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC REGISTRY OF MONTREAL No: 500-09-021358-114 ( 500-17-037153-072 ) MINUTES OF THE HEARING DATE: April 11, 2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE PIERRE J. DALPHOND, J.A. NICOLE DUVAL HESLER, J.A. NICHOLAS KASIRER, J.A. APPELLANT ATTORNEY PANAGIOTIS (Peter) ROTHOS Mtre Gregory Azancot AZANCOT & ASSOCIATES RESPONDENT ATTORNEY FOTINI GASSIOS Mtre Charles Gelber YANOFSKY GELBER MANCUSO IMPLEADED PARTY ATTORNEY EMMANUEL (Manny) KARAPETSAS (Defendant)
Motion to dismiss the appeal from a judgment rendered on December 15, 2010 by the Honourable Justice Suzanne Courteau of the Superior Court, District of Montreal. Clerk: Robert Osadchuck Courtroom: Pierre-Basile-Mignault HEARING 12 h 19 Beginning of the hearing. 12 h 19 The Court is asking counsel for appellant to plead first. 12 h 19 Argumentation by Mtre Azancot. 12 h 38 Recess. 12 h 42 Resumption of the hearing. 12 h 42 Counsel for petitioner does not have to plead. 12 h 42 By the Court: judgment (see next page).
Robert Osadchuck Clerk BY THE COURT JUDGMENT [ 1 ] Appellant's main argument is that the trial judge preferred the testimony of factual witnesses over the testimony of a handwriting expert whose opinion contained several caveats . The first judge clearly enunciated her reasons for doing so and the appeal raises only issues of credibility and fact. The appeal has no reasonable chance of success.
[ 2 ] For these reasons, the Motion to Dismiss Appeal is granted, with costs, and the appeal is dismissed, with costs. PIERRE J. DALPHOND, J.A. NICOLE DUVAL HESLER, J.A. NICHOLAS KASIRER, J.A.
Loading document…