2021 QCCA 1462, 2021 QCCA 1462
Opinion
Huang c. Yan 2021 QCCA 1462 COURT OF APPEAL CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC REGISTRY OF MONTREAL No: 500-09-029276-201 , 500-09-029277-209 ( 500-17-111266-204 , 500-17-111035-203 ) MINUTES OF THE HEARING DATE : September 30, 2021 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MARK SCHRAGER, J.A. CHRISTINE BAUDOUIN, J.A. FRÉDÉRIC BACHAND, J.A. No: 500-09-029276-201 (500-17-111266-204) APPELLANT COUNSEL tzu-yin huang Mtre daniel brook ( Brook Legal ) RESPONDENTS COUNSEL xin hong yan yang zhang 8478791 canada inc.
Mtre rita NATHALIE menneh M tre SAMANTHA D BOUCHARD ( Menneh Légal ) No: 500-09-029277-209 (500-17-111035-203) APPELLANT COUNSEL zhirong li Mtre daniel brook ( Brook Legal ) RESPONDENTS COUNSEL xin hong van yang zhang 8478791 canada inc. Mtre rita NATHALIE menneh M tre SAMANTHA D BOUCHARD ( Menneh Légal )
500-09-029276-201 , 500-09-02977-209 On appeal from a judgment rendered on November 26, 2020 by the Honourable Guylène Beaugé of the Superior Court , District of Montréal . DESCRIPTION: 500-09-029276-201 , 500-09-029277-209 Declinatory exception – Immigration Services Contract – Choice of court clause – Territorial jurisdiction – Jurisdiction of the Quebec courts. Application for authorization to modify appellant’s memorandum by adding documents to
Schedule III (Art. 25, 206 C.C.P. and art. 34, 45, 55 C.P.R. ). Clerk at the hearing : Lesly Ramos Courtroom: Antonio-Lamer HEARING 11:16 Commencement of the hearing. Identification of counsel. 11:17 Concerning the Application for authorization to modify appellant’s memorandum by adding documents to
schedule III: BY THE COURT: Judgment – See page 4. 11:18 Mtre Brook filed a list of exhibits. 11:19 Submissions by Mtre Brook. 11:26 Question by the Court and response by Mtre Brook. 11:34 Submissions by Mtre Menneh. 11:35 Discussion between the Court and Mtre Menneh. 11:49 Mtre Menneh resumes her submissions. 11:53 Questions by the Court and responses by Mtre Menneh. 11:56 Mtre Menneh resumes her submissions. 12:13 Reply by Mtre Brook. 12:15 Discussion between the Court and Mtre Brook. 12:18 Recess of the hearing. 12:34 Resumption of the hearing. BY THE COURT: The case is taken under advisement.
Conclusion of the hearing. Lesly Ramos, Clerk at the hearing JUDGMENT [ 1 ] Given that the Application for authorization to modify appellant’s memorandum by adding documents to
schedule III is not contested; [ 2 ] Given that the documents in question are all proceedings in first instance;
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT: [ 3 ] GRANTS the application according to its conclusions, without legal costs. MARK SCHRAGER, J.A. CHRISTINE BAUDOUIN, J.A. FRÉDÉRIC BACHAND, J.A.
Loading document…